Search

Introduction The CALGB 30610/RTOG 0538 randomized trial was designed to test whether high-dose thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) would improve survival compared with 45 Gy twice-daily (BID) TRT in limited stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC). Two piloted experimental TRT regimens were of interest to study, 70 Gy daily (QD) and 61.2 Gy concomitant boost (CB). Driven by concerns about adequate patient accrual, a study design was employed that eliminated one experimental TRT arm based on early interim toxicity and tolerability, with the study then continuing as a traditional 2-arm phase III study. Methods Patients with LSCLC were assigned to receive four cycles of cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy with one of 3 TRT regimens starting with either the first or second cycle of chemotherapy. The interim endpoint was the cumulative highest toxicity calculated from a scoring system based on treatment-related grade 3 and higher toxicity and the ability to complete therapy in the experimental arms. Results The final interim analysis was performed after 70 patients accrued to each experimental cohort, and a difference in treatment related toxicity scoring was not found (p = 0.739). Severe esophageal toxicity was comparable in both cohorts. Pulmonary toxicity was low overall, though 4 patients (5.7 %) on the 61.2 Gy arm developed grade 4 dyspnea, which was not observed in the 70 Gy arm. A protocol mandated decision was made to discontinue the 61.2 Gy arm following review of toxicity with the Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Conclusion A randomized trial design using a planned early interim toxicity analysis to discriminate between experimental treatment arms is feasible in a phase III setting. Refinement of the design could increase the likelihood of detecting clinically meaningful differences in toxicity in future studies.

Introduction Several programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays have been developed independently within clinical programs for therapeutic anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (anti–PD-1) or PD-L1 antibodies, necessitating assessment of assay comparability. We characterized the Dako PD-L1 IHC 73-10 assay used in clinical trials of avelumab (anti–PD-L1) or bintrafusp alfa (M7824; bifunctional immunotherapy) and compared it with the Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay, an approved companion diagnostic for pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded NSCLC tumor samples from a commercial source and from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor phase 1 trial of avelumab (NCT01772004) were stained using the 73-10 and 22C3 IHC assays with a standard protocol. Results Both assays displayed expected PD-L1 staining patterns. In 148 commercial NSCLC samples, the 73-10 assay stained greater than or equal to 1%, greater than or equal to 50%, and greater than or equal to 80% of tumor cells as PD-L1+ in 64.2%, 36.5%, and 23.6% of the samples, respectively, whereas the 22C3 assay stained 20.3% of the samples as greater than or equal to 50% PD-L1+. In 83 NSCLC clinical trial samples, the 73-10 assay stained 79.5% and 31.3% of the samples as greater than or equal to 1% and greater than or equal to 80% PD-L1+, respectively, whereas the 22C3 assay stained 59.0% and 21.7% as greater than or equal to 1% and greater than or equal to 50% PD-L1+, respectively. Efficacy of avelumab was similar in the subgroups classified with the 73-10 and 22C3 assays using greater than or equal to 80% and greater than or equal to 50% PD-L1+ cutoffs, with objective response rates of 26.9% and 33.3%, respectively. Conclusions The 73-10 assay demonstrated high sensitivity for PD-L1 staining, and staining was comparable between the greater than or equal to 80% cutoff of the 73-10 assay and greater than or equal to 50% cutoff of the 22C3 assay.

To report functional outcomes for patients with human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer treated on a phase 2 protocol of risk- and induction chemotherapy response-adapted dose and volume de-escalated radiation therapy (RT)/chemoradiation (CRT).Patients were stratified as low risk (LR) or high risk (HR) according to T/N-stage and smoking history. Induction chemotherapy was followed by radiographic response assessment. LR patients with ≥50% response received 50 Gy RT (RT50), whereas LR patients with 30% to 50% response or HR patients with ≥50% response received 45 Gy CRT (CRT45). All other patients received 75 Gy CRT (CRT75) with RT limited to the first echelon of uninvolved nodes. Pre- and post-RT/CRT modified barium swallow studies were performed. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement, body mass index (BMI), and narcotic use were recorded. Statistical comparisons used linear or logistic regression, the Mann-Whitney U test, the χTwenty-eight LR and 34 HR patients were enrolled; 49 completed RT50/CRT45 and 11 completed CRT75. PEG-tube dependency at the end of RT/CRT and 3 months post-RT/CRT significantly differed according to risk and treatment groups (all P.05). Treatment intensity was independently associated with 3-month PEG status while adjusting for risk group (P = .002). The CRT75 group had a median -8.42% change from baseline BMI at 1 year post-RT/CRT versus -2.54% for the RT50/CRT45 group (P = .01). At the end of RT/CRT, CRT75 patients were less likely to tolerate a normal diet, more likely to have swallowing performance status scale scores ≥4, more likely to have Rosenbek's penetration-aspiration scores ≥7, more likely to have developed trismus, and more likely to require narcotics2 months (all P.05).Induction chemotherapy followed by risk- and response-adapted dose and volume de-escalated RT/CRT is associated with clinically meaningful functional outcomes including (1) improved swallowing function, (2) higher BMI, and (3) shorter narcotic use for patients receiving de-escalation.

Background MET signaling is a well described mechanism of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy, and MET overexpression is common in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). In the current trial, the authors compared the oral MET inhibitor tivantinib (ARQ197) in combination with cetuximab (the TC arm) versus a control arm that received cetuximab monotherapy (C) in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. Methods In total, 78 evaluable patients with cetuximab-naive, platinum-refractory HNSCC were enrolled, including 40 on the TC arm and 38 on the C arm (stratified by human papillomavirus [HPV] status). Patients received oral tivantinib 360 mg twice daily and intravenous cetuximab 500 mg/m2 once every 2 weeks. The primary outcome was the response rate (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1), and secondary outcomes included progression-free and overall survival. After patients progressed on the C arm, tivantinib monotherapy was optional. Results The response rate was 7.5% in the TC arm (N = 3; 1 complete response) and 7.9% in the C arm (N = 3; not significantly different [NS]). The median progression-free survival in both arms was 4 months (NS), and the median overall survival was 8 months (NS). Both treatments were well tolerated, with a trend toward increased hematologic toxicities in the TC arm (12.5% had grade 3 leukopenia). The response rate in 31 HPV-positive/p16-positive patients was 0% in both arms, whereas the response rate in HPV-negative patients was 12.7% (12.5% in the TC arm and 13% in the C arm). Fifteen patients received tivantinib monotherapy, and no responses were observed. Conclusions Combined tivantinib plus cetuximab does not significantly improve the response rate or survival compared with cetuximab alone but does increase toxicity in an unselected HNSCC population. Cetuximab responses appear to be limited to patients who have HPV-negative HNSCC. MET-aberration-focused trials for HNSCC and the use of higher potency, selective MET inhibitors remain of interest.

PURPOSE Squamous non–small-cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) is genetically complex with evidence of DNA damage. This phase III study investigated the efficacy and safety of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor veliparib in combination with conventional chemotherapy for advanced sqNSCLC ( NCT02106546 ). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients age ≥ 18 years with untreated, advanced sqNSCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 to carboplatin and paclitaxel with veliparib 120 mg twice daily (twice a day) or placebo twice a day for up to six cycles. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) in the veliparib arm versus the control arm in current smokers, based on phase II findings. Archival tumor samples were provided for biomarker analysis using a 52-gene expression histology classifier (LP52). RESULTS Overall, 970 patients were randomly assigned to carboplatin and paclitaxel plus either veliparib (n = 486) or placebo (n = 484); 57% were current smokers. There was no significant OS benefit with veliparib in current smokers, with median OS 11.9 versus 11.1 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.905; 95% CI, 0.744 to 1.101; P = .266). In the overall population, OS favored veliparib; median OS was 12.2 versus 11.2 months (HR, 0.853; 95% CI, 0.747 to 0.974), with no difference in progression-free survival (median 5.6 months per arm). In patients with biomarker-evaluable tumor samples (n = 360), OS favored veliparib in the LP52-positive population (median 14.0 v 9.6 months; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.89), but favored placebo in the LP52-negative population (median 11.0 v 14.4 months; HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.86). No new safety signals were observed in the experimental arm. CONCLUSION In current smokers with advanced sqNSCLC, there was no therapeutic benefit of adding veliparib to first-line chemotherapy. The LP52 signature may identify a subgroup of patients likely to derive benefit from veliparib with chemotherapy.

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) improves outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) though most patients progress. There are limited data regarding molecular predictors of progression. In particular, there is controversy regarding the role of CDKN2A loss-of-function (LOF) in ICB resistance. We analyzed 139 consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent NGS prior to ICB initiation to explore the association of CDKN2A LOF with clinical outcomes. 73% were PD-L1 positive (≥ 1%). 48% exhibited high TMB (≥ 10 mutations/megabase). CDKN2A LOF was present in 26% of patients and was associated with inferior PFS (multivariate hazard ratio [MVA-HR] 1.66, 95% CI 1.02–2.63, p = 0.041) and OS (MVA-HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.21–3.49, p = 0.0087) when compared to wild-type (WT) patients. These findings held in patients with high TMB (median OS, LOF vs. WT 10.5 vs. 22.3 months; p = 0.069) and PD-L1 ≥ 50% (median OS, LOF vs. WT 11.1 vs. 24.2 months; p = 0.020), as well as in an independent dataset. CDKN2A LOF vs. WT tumors were twice as likely to experience disease progression following ICB (46% vs. 21%; p = 0.021). CDKN2A LOF negatively impacts clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC treated with ICB, even in high PD-L1 and high TMB tumors. This novel finding should be prospectively validated and presents a potential therapeutic target.

Previous studies have evaluated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligometastatic patients with NSCLC, including multimodality treatment with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 monotherapy. Questions remain regarding the timing of SBRT and immunotherapy, safety with dual checkpoint blockade, and the utility in widely metastatic patients. This randomized phase 1 trial combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with sequential or concurrent multisite SBRT in patients with stage IV NSCLC to evaluate safety and obtain preliminary activity data.Treatment-naive patients with metastatic NSCLC were randomized to concurrent (SBRT with immunotherapy) or sequential (SBRT followed by immunotherapy) treatment. A maximum of four treatment fields received SBRT. Nivolumab and ipilimumab were continued until clinical progression, development of toxicity, or after 2 years. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as greater than or equal to grade 3 toxicity to the relevant organ system attributed to SBRT and immunotherapy occuring within 3 months.A total of 37 patients were assessable. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred in the concurrent cohort (n = 18). The sequential cohort required a dose reduction in the central lung group owing to two grade 4 pneumonitis events (2 of 19). Overall best response was as follows: 5.4% (2 of 37) complete response, 40.5% (15 of 37) partial response, 16.2% (6 of 37) stable disease, and 37.8% (14 of 37) progressive disease. Median progression-free survival was 5.8 months (95% confidence interval: 3.6-11.4 mo), with median follow-up of 17.0 months. Median overall survival was not reached.Concurrent nivolumab, ipilimumab, and SBRT were not more toxic than sequential therapy, and multisite SBRT was well tolerated in widely metastatic patients. Multimodality therapy resulted in durable metastasis control and encouraging early overall survival.

Background This study assessed the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the PI3K inhibitor buparlisib given concurrently with cetuximab in recurrent and metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods Twelve patients with R/M HNSCC were enrolled. Patients were given oral buparlisib starting day 7 and daily thereafter. The dose of buparlisib was escalated in a 3 + 3 design followed by a dose expansion cohort of 6 patients. The MTD of buparlisib per protocol was 100 mg daily with cetuximab given intravenously every 14 days starting day 0. Results Ten patients had ≥2 previous treatment regimens (11 with prior cetuximab). There were no dose limiting toxicities observed during dose escalation. One patient achieved a partial response and 4 achieved stable disease. Conclusion Based on this pilot study, buparlisib at 100 mg daily plus cetuximab proved to be well-tolerated. Patients previously treated with cetuximab monotherapy showed benefit from this combination.

Purpose: Cetuximab, which modulates immune responses, may affect the efficacy of subsequent immunotherapy. Here, we assessed outcomes with nivolumab, by prior cetuximab exposure, in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who had experienced progression within 6 months of platinum-containing chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: In the randomized, open-label, phase III CheckMate 141 trial, patients were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or investigator's choice (IC) of single-agent chemotherapy, with stratification by prior cetuximab exposure. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); additional endpoints were progression-free survival, objective response rate, and safety. Results: In patients with prior cetuximab exposure, the median OS was 7.1 months with nivolumab versus 5.1 months with IC (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.62–1.15); OS benefit with nivolumab was maintained across most demographic subgroups. In patients without prior cetuximab exposure, the median OS was 8.2 months with nivolumab versus 4.9 months with IC (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35–0.77); OS benefit with nivolumab was maintained across patient baseline subgroups including tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ( Conclusions: Nivolumab appeared to improve efficacy versus IC regardless of prior cetuximab use, supporting its use in patients with R/M SCCHN with or without prior cetuximab exposure. The reduction in risk of death with nivolumab compared with IC was greater in patients without prior cetuximab exposure versus with prior cetuximab exposure.

BACKGROUND Platinum and etoposide with thoracic radiation followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation constitute the standard treatment for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Many patients with LS-SCLC are elderly with comorbidities. METHODS Individual patient data were collected from 11 phase 2 or 3 trials for LS-SCLC conducted by the National Clinical Trials Network and activated from 1990 to 2010. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), the rate of severe adverse events, and off-treatment reasons. The outcomes were compared for patients 70 years old or older (elderly patients) and patients younger than 70 years (younger patients). RESULTS Individual patient data from 1049 younger patients (81%) and 254 elderly patients (19%) were analyzed. In the multivariate model, elderly patients, in comparison with younger patients, had worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.63; median OS for elderly patients, 17.8 months; OS for younger patients, 23.5 months) and worse PFS (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.39; median PFS for elderly patients, 10.6 months; median PFS for younger patients, 12.3 months). Elderly patients, in comparison with younger patients, experienced more grade 5 adverse events (8% vs 3%; P < .01) and more grade 3 or higher dyspnea (11% vs 7%; P = .03) but less grade 3 or higher esophagitis/dysphagia (14% vs 19%; P = .04) and less grade 3 or higher vomiting (11% vs 17%; P = .01). Elderly patients completed treatment less often, discontinued treatment because of adverse events and patient refusal more frequently, and died during treatment more frequently. CONCLUSIONS Elderly patients with LS-SCLC have worse PFS and OS and more difficulty in tolerating therapy. Future trials should incorporate assessments of elderly patients, novel monitoring of adverse events, and more tolerable radiation and systemic therapies.

Purpose: CD137 agonism and CSF1R blockade augment stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and anti-programmed death-1 in preclinical models. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of SBRT with nivolumab+urelumab (CD137 agonist) or nivolumab+cabiralizumab (CSF1R inhibitor). Patients and Methods: This phase I clinical trial enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors that had progressed on standard therapies. SBRT was delivered to 1–4 metastases with nivolumab+urelumab or nivolumab+cabiralizumab given concurrently and following SBRT. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was the primary endpoint with anatomic location-specific SBRT doses deemed safe if ≤33% DLT frequency was observed. Secondary endpoints included RECISTv1.1 response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and molecular correlative studies. Results: Sixty patients were enrolled, and median follow-up for living patients is 13.8 months. Of these, 23 (38%) received SBRT+nivolumab+urelumab and 37 (62%) received SBRT+nivolumab+cabiralizumab. Seven patients (12%) experienced a DLT (n = 3 grade 3, n = 4 grade 4) in the following anatomic cohorts: abdominal/pelvic (3/17, 18%), liver (1/13, 8%), central lung (2/14, 14%), and peripheral lung (1/12, 8%). Of 41 patients radiographically evaluable for best overall response including 55 radiated and 23 unirradiated RECIST target lesions, 2 had complete responses (5%), 7 had partial responses (17%), 12 had stable disease (29%), and 20 had progression (49%). Median estimated PFS and OS are 3.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.9–4.8] and 17.0 months (95% CI, 6.8–undetermined), respectively. No patients with elevated pre-SBRT serum IL8 experienced a response. Conclusions: SBRT to ≤4 sites with nivolumab+urelumab or nivolumab+cabiralizumab for treating advanced solid tumors is feasible with acceptable toxicity and modest antitumor activity. See related commentary by Rodriguez-Ruiz et al., p. 5443

PURPOSE Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In two phase III trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057), nivolumab showed an improvement in overall survival (OS) and favorable safety versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated, advanced squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC, respectively. We report 5-year pooled efficacy and safety from these trials. METHODS Patients (N = 854; CheckMate 017/057 pooled) with advanced NSCLC, ECOG PS ≤ 1, and progression during or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point for both trials was OS; secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Exploratory landmark analyses were investigated. RESULTS After the minimum follow-up of 64.2 and 64.5 months for CheckMate 017 and 057, respectively, 50 nivolumab-treated patients and nine docetaxel-treated patients were alive. Five-year pooled OS rates were 13.4% versus 2.6%, respectively; 5-year PFS rates were 8.0% versus 0%, respectively. Nivolumab-treated patients without disease progression at 2 and 3 years had an 82.0% and 93.0% chance of survival, respectively, and a 59.6% and 78.3% chance of remaining progression-free at 5 years, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 8 of 31 (25.8%) nivolumab-treated patients between 3–5 years of follow-up, seven of whom experienced new events; one (3.2%) TRAE was grade 3, and there were no grade 4 TRAEs. CONCLUSION At 5 years, nivolumab continued to demonstrate a survival benefit versus docetaxel, exhibiting a five-fold increase in OS rate, with no new safety signals. These data represent the first report of 5-year outcomes from randomized phase III trials of a programmed death-1 inhibitor in previously treated, advanced NSCLC.

Purpose: Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is an anti–c-Met–directed antibody–drug conjugate. Here, we present safety and efficacy data from a phase I/Ib study of Teliso-V monotherapy evaluated in once every 2 weeks/once every 3 weeks schedules in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: During dose escalation, patients received Teliso-V monotherapy intravenously once every 3 weeks (0.15–3.3 mg/kg) or once every 2 weeks (1.6–2.2 mg/kg). The dose-expansion phase enrolled patients with NSCLC and c-Met H-score ≥150 (c-Met+) or MET amplification/exon 14 skipping mutations. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy were assessed. Herein, the analysis of patients receiving ≥1.6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks or ≥2.4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks Teliso-V is reported. Results: Fifty-two patients with NSCLC were enrolled and received ≥1.6 mg/kg Teliso-V once every 2 weeks (n = 28) or ≥2.4 mg/kg Teliso-V once every 3 weeks (n = 24). The most common adverse events were fatigue (54%), peripheral neuropathy (42%), and nausea (38%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed for Teliso-V once every 2 weeks and once every 3 weeks up to 2.2 and 2.7 mg/kg, respectively. The recommended phase II dose was established at 1.9 mg/kg once every 2 weeks and 2.7 mg/kg once every 3 weeks on the basis of overall safety and pharmacokinetics. Forty of 52 patients were c-Met+ (33 nonsquamous, 6 squamous, 1 mixed histology) and were included in the efficacy-evaluable population. Of those, 9 (23%) had objective responses with median duration of response of 8.7 months; median progression-free survival was 5.2 months. Conclusions: Teliso-V monotherapy was tolerated and showed antitumor activity in c-Met+ NSCLC. On the basis of overall safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy outcomes, 1.9 mg/kg Teliso-V once every 2 weeks and 2.7 mg/kg once every 3 weeks schedules were selected for further clinical development.

Tumor-induced CD45(−)Ter119(+)CD71(+) erythroid progenitor cells (EPCs), termed “Ter-cells,” promote tumor progression by secreting artemin, a neurotrophic peptide that activates REarranged during Transfection (RET) signaling. We demonstrate that both local tumor ionizing radiation (IR) and anti-Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) treatment decreased tumor-induced Ter-cell abundance in mouse spleen and artemin secretion outside the irradiation field in an interferon- (IFN) and CD8(+) T cell-dependent manner. Recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) promoted resistance to radiotherapy or anti-PD-L1 therapies by restoring Ter-cell numbers and serum artemin concentration. Blockade of artemin or potential artemin signaling partners, or depletion of Ter-cells augmented the anti-tumor effects of both IR and anti-PD-L1 therapies in mice. Analysis of samples from patients who received radio-immunotherapy demonstrated that IR-mediated reduction of Ter-cells, artemin, and GFRα3, an artemin signaling partner, were each associated with tumor regression. Patients with melanoma who received immunotherapy exhibited favorable outcomes associated with decreased expression of GFRα3. These findings demonstrate an out-of-field, or “abscopal,” effect mediated by adaptive immunity, which is induced during local tumor irradiation. This effect, in turn, governs the therapeutic effects of radiation and immunotherapy. Therefore, our results identify multiple targets to potentially improve outcomes following radiotherapy and immunotherapy.

Objectives Veliparib is a potent poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) 1 and 2 inhibitor that impedes repair of DNA damage induced by cytotoxic and radiation therapies. This phase 1 study evaluated veliparib in combination with chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and methods Patients received veliparib orally twice daily (BID) in escalating doses (60–240 mg, Day –3 to 1 day after last dose of radiation) combined with weekly carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 2 mg/mL/min), paclitaxel (45 mg/m2), and daily radiation therapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions), followed by two cycles of veliparib (120–240 mg BID, Days –2 through 5 of each 21-day cycle), carboplatin (AUC 6 mg/mL/min, Day 1 of each cycle), and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2, Day 1 of each cycle) consolidation. Endpoints included veliparib maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy. Results Forty-eight patients were enrolled. The MTD/RP2D of veliparib was 240 mg BID with chemoradiotherapy followed by 120 mg BID with consolidation. The most common any-grade adverse events (AEs) in this cohort for the whole treatment period were nausea (83%), esophagitis (75%), neutropenia (75%), and thrombocytopenia (75%). Dose-proportional pharmacokinetics of veliparib were observed. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 19.6 months (95% CI: 9.7–32.6). Median overall survival was estimated to be 32.6 months (95% CI: 15.0–not reached). In patients treated with the RP2D, mPFS was 19.6 months (95% CI: 3.0–not reached). Conclusions When combined with standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in patients with stage III NSCLC, veliparib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and antitumor activity with an mPFS of 19.6 months.

ObjectivesWe report the results of this phase I study to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of veliparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel induction chemotherapy (IC) for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).Materials and methodsIn a 3+3 cohort design, patients with stage IVA-B human papillomavirus-negative HNSCC received 2 cycles of carboplatin (AUC 6, day 1), paclitaxel (100mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15) and veliparib (days 1-7) every 21days followed by standard curative-intent chemoradiotherapy. Primary endpoint: MTD and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) as determined by the first IC cycle.ResultsTwenty patients enrolled. Two withdrew before treatment; 18 patients were analyzed. Median age was 63years. Primary disease sites included hypopharynx (n=5), larynx (n=5), oral cavity (n=4), oropharynx (n=3), and nasal cavity (n=1). Through all of IC, the most common grade 3+adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (33%), thrombocytopenia (33%), anemia (11%), and white blood cell decrease (11%). One patient experienced a hematologic DLT at 350mg BID. The RP2D for veliparib combined with carboplatin/paclitaxel is 350mg BID. With 40.9month median follow-up across dose levels for all patients, the 24-month overall and progression free survival was 77.8% (95% CI 60.8-99.6%) and 66.7% (95% CI 48.1-92.4%), respectively. Medians have not been reached.ConclusionAddition of veliparib to carboplatin and paclitaxel IC was well tolerated in patients with advanced HNSCC. Hematologic toxicities were the most common AEs.

Contains fulltext : 235407.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) BACKGROUND: Randomised, controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown the survival benefit of concomitant chemoradiotherapy or hyperfractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. However, the relative efficacy of these treatments is unknown. We aimed to determine whether one treatment was superior to the other. METHODS: We did a frequentist network meta-analysis based on individual patient data of meta-analyses evaluating the role of chemotherapy (Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer [MACH-NC]) and of altered fractionation radiotherapy (Meta-Analysis of Radiotherapy in Carcinomas of Head and Neck [MARCH]). Randomised, controlled trials that enrolled patients with non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer between Jan 1, 1980, and Dec 31, 2016, were included. We used a two-step random-effects approach, and the log-rank test, stratified by trial to compare treatments, with locoregional therapy as the reference. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. The global Cochran Q statistic was used to assess homogeneity and consistency and P score to rank treatments (higher scores indicate more effective therapies). FINDINGS: 115 randomised, controlled trials, which enrolled patients between Jan 1, 1980, and April 30, 2012, yielded 154 comparisons (28 978 patients with 19 253 deaths and 20 579 progression events). Treatments were grouped into 16 modalities, for which 35 types of direct comparisons were available. Median follow-up based on all trials was 6·6 years (IQR 5·0-9·4). Hyperfractionated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (HFCRT) was ranked as the best treatment for overall survival (P score 97%; hazard ratio 0·63 [95% CI 0·51-0·77] compared with locoregional therapy). The hazard ratio of HFCRT compared with locoregional therapy with concomitant chemoradiotherapy with platinum-based chemotherapy (CLRT(P)) was 0·82 (95% CI 0·66-1·01) for overall survival. The superiority of HFCRT was robust to sensitivity analyses. Three other modalities of treatment had a better P score, but not a significantly better HR, for overall survival than CLRT(P) (P score 78%): induction chemotherapy with taxane, cisplatin, and fluorouracil followed by locoregional therapy (IC(TaxPF)-LRT; 89%), accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (82%), and IC(TaxPF) followed by CLRT (80%). INTERPRETATION: The results of this network meta-analysis suggest that further intensifying chemoradiotherapy, using HFCRT or IC(TaxPF)-CLRT, could improve outcomes over chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. FUNDINGS: French Institut National du Cancer, French Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, and Fondation ARC.

Background Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) is an inhibitory Notch ligand that is highly expressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and minimally expressed in normal tissues.1 AMG 757, a half-life extended BiTE® immune therapy, binds to DLL3 on tumor cells and CD3 on T cells, resulting in T cell-dependent killing of tumor cells. We report initial safety and efficacy from the ongoing phase 1 study of AMG 757 in patients with SCLC. Methods AMG 757 was administered intravenously every two weeks (with/without step dose) at doses of 0.003–3.0 mg. Eligible patients had SCLC that progressed or recurred following ≥1 platinum-based regimen. Antitumor activity was assessed using modified RECIST 1.1. The study was approved by the Ethics Board at participating institutions. Results As of 1 June 2020, safety and efficacy data are available for 31 patients enrolled at the first seven dose levels (DL) with median age, 63 (44–74) years; ECOG PS: 0–1, n=30 (96.8%); median prior lines, 2.0 (1–6); and previous PD-1/PD-L1 treatment: n=12 (38.7%). Median treatment duration was 6.1 (0.1–59.4) weeks. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported for 30 (96.8%) patients. AMG 757-related AEs occurred in 25 (80.6%) patients, including 5 (16.1%) that were grade ≥3 and one (3.2%) grade 5 (pneumonitis in DL5 [0.3 mg]). Three AEs (dyspnea, pneumonitis, fatigue) led to treatment discontinuation. The most common AE was cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which was reported in 11 (35.5%) patients. CRS AEs were grade 1–2, consisted mainly of fever with/without hypotension, and occurred mostly within 24 hours of the first or second dose of AMG 757. CRS events were reversible, did not lead to treatment interruption or discontinuation, and were managed with supportive care, corticosteroids, and/or anti-IL 6 therapy. The MTD for AMG 757 has not yet been reached. AMG 757 exhibited dose proportional increase in exposures. Response to AMG 757 is shown (figure 1). Confirmed partial response was reported in 5 (16.1%) patients (1/12 [8.3%] in DL5, 1/8 [12.5%] in DL6, 3/7 [42.9%] in DL7), and stable disease in 8 (25.8%) of all treated patients. Most responses occurred after 8 weeks on treatment. All responders remain on treatment with duration of response ranging from 2.0+ to 7.4 months+. Conclusions AMG 757 administered at a dose of up to 3 mg every two weeks has an acceptable safety profile and shows anti-tumor activity in patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC. Further dose escalation is ongoing. Trial Registration NCT03319940 Ethics Approval The study was approved by the Ethics Board at participating institutions. Consent N/A Reference Leonetti A, Facchinetti F, Minari R, Cortellini A, Rolfo CD, Giovannetti E, Tiseo M. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2019;42:261–273.

Background and Aim Retrospective analysis of the utility of adjuvant radiation (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) and identify prognostic features for patients with high‐risk head and neck salivary gland cancers. Methods From 1/1997 to 12/2017, 108 patients underwent surgery, and RT (n = 50) or CRT (n = 58) for positive lymph node(s), extracapsular extension, perineural invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, positive/close margin, and/or grade 3 disease. Outcomes were estimated with the Kaplan‐Meier method. Significant predictors identified through regression analyses were incorporated into multivariable regression (MVA). Toxicities were compared using chi‐square. Results The median follow‐up was 52 months (range: 3‐226). The number of risk factors (RFs) between RT and CRT groups were: 0 to 1 (44% vs 7%), 2 to 3 (48% vs 41%), or 4 to 6 (8% vs 52%), respectively (P

Treatment of locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma involves a multidisciplinary approach that combines surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy. These curative strategies are associated with significant acute and long-term toxicities. With the emergence of human papillomavirus (HPV) as an etiologic factor associated primarily with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, higher cure rates juxtaposed with substantial treatment-related morbidity and mortality has led to interest in de-escalated therapeutic strategies, with the goal of optimizing oncologic outcomes while reducing treatment-related toxicity. Currently explored strategies include replacing, reducing, or omitting cytotoxic chemotherapy; reducing dose or volume of radiotherapy; and incorporation of less-invasive surgical approaches. Potential biomarkers to select patients for treatment de-escalation include clinical risk stratification, adjuvant de-escalation based on pathologic features, response to induction therapy, and molecular markers. The optimal patient selection and de-escalation strategy is critically important in the evolving treatment of locoregional head and neck cancer. Recently, two large phase III trials, RTOG 1016 and De-ESCALaTE, failed to de-escalate treatment in HPV-associated head and neck cancer by demonstrating inferior outcomes by replacing cisplatin with cetuximab in combination with radiation. This serves as a cautionary tale in the future design of de-escalation trials in this patient population, which will need to leverage toxicity and efficacy endpoints. Our review summarizes completed and ongoing de-escalation trials in head and neck cancer, with particular emphasis on biomarkers for patient selection and clinical trial design. Implications for Practice The toxicity associated with standard multimodality treatment for head and neck cancer underscores the need to seek less-intensive therapies with a reduced long-term symptom burden through de-escalated treatment paradigms that minimize toxicity while maintaining oncologic control in appropriately selected patients. Controversy regarding the optimal de-escalation strategy and criteria for patient selection for de-escalated therapy has led to multiple parallel strategies undergoing clinical investigation. Well-designed trials that optimize multimodal strategies are needed. Given the absence of positive randomized trials testing de-escalated therapy to date, practicing oncologists should exercise caution and administer established standard-of-care therapy outside the context of a clinical trial.

Summary Background The Lung Cancer Master Protocol (Lung-MAP; S1400) is a completed biomarker-driven master protocol designed to address an unmet need for better therapies for squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung-MAP (S1400) was created to establish an infrastructure for biomarker screening and rapid regulatory intent evaluation of targeted therapies and was the first biomarker-driven master protocol initiated with the US National Cancer Institute (NCI). Methods Lung-MAP (S1400) was done within the National Clinical Trials Network of the NCI using a public–private partnership. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had stage IV or recurrent squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, had previously been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2. The study included a screening component using the FoundationOne assay (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA) for next-generation sequencing, and a clinical trial component with biomarker-driven substudies and non-match substudies for patients who were ineligible for biomarker-driven substudies. Patients were pre-screened and received their substudy assignment upon progression, or they were screened at progression and received their substudy assignment upon completion of testing. Patients could enrol onto additional substudies after progression on a substudy. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02154490 , and all research related to Lung-MAP (S1400) is completed. Findings Between June 16, 2014, and Jan 28, 2019, 1864 patients enrolled and 1841 (98·9%) submitted tissue. 1674 (90·9%) of 1841 patients had biomarker results, and 1404 (83·9%) of 1674 patients received a substudy assignment. Of the assigned patients, 655 (46·7%) registered to a substudy. The biomarker-driven substudies evaluated taselisib (targeting PIK3CA alterations), palbociclib (cell cycle gene alterations), AZD4547 (FGFR alteration), rilotumumab plus erlotinib (MET), talazoparib (homologous recombination repair deficiency), and telisotuzumab vedotin (MET). The non-match substudies evaluated durvalumab, and nivolumab plus ipilimumab for anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1-naive disease, and durvalumab plus tremelimumab for anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 relapsed disease. Combining data from the substudies, ten (7·0%) of 143 patients responded to targeted therapy, 53 (16·8%) of 315 patients responded to anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy for immunotherapy-naive disease, and three (5·4%) of 56 responded to docetaxel in the second line of therapy. Median overall survival was 5·9 months (95% CI 4·8–7·8) for the targeted therapy groups, 7·7 months (6·7–9·2) for the docetaxel groups, and 10·8 months (9·4–12·3) for the anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1-containing groups. Median progression-free survival was 2·5 months (95% CI 1·7–2·8) for the targeted therapy groups, 2·7 months (1·9–2·9) for the docetaxel groups, and 3·0 months (2·7–3·9) for the anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1-containing groups. Interpretation Lung-MAP (S1400) met its goal to quickly address biomarker-driven therapy questions in squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. In early 2019, a new screening protocol was implemented expanding to all histological types of non-small-cell lung cancer and to add focus on immunotherapy combinations for anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 therapy-relapsed disease. With these changes, Lung-MAP continues to meet its goal to focus on unmet needs in the treatment of advanced lung cancers. Funding US National Institutes of Health, and AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, and Pfizer through the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health.

Background Patients with cetuximab-resistant, recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have poor outcomes. This study hypothesized that dual blockade of mammalian target of rapamycin and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) would overcome cetuximab resistance on the basis of the role of phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling in preclinical models of EGFR resistance. Methods In this multicenter, randomized clinical study, patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC with documented progression on cetuximab (in any line in the recurrent/metastatic setting) received 25 mg of temsirolimus weekly plus cetuximab at 400/250 mg/m2 weekly (TC) or single-agent temsirolimus (T). The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) in the TC arm versus the T arm. Response rates, overall survival, and toxicity were secondary outcomes. Results Eighty patients were randomized to therapy with TC or T alone. There was no difference for the primary outcome of median PFS (TC arm, 3.5 months; T arm, 3.5 months). The response rate was 12.5% in the TC arm (5 responses, including 1 complete response [2.5%]) and 2.5% in the T arm (1 partial response; P = .10). Responses were clinically meaningful in the TC arm (range, 3.6-9.1 months) but not in the T-alone arm (1.9 months). Fatigue, electrolyte abnormalities, and leukopenia were the most common grade 3 or higher adverse events and occurred in less than 20% of patients in both arms. Conclusions The study did not meet its primary endpoint of improvement in PFS. However, TC induced responses in cetuximab-refractory patients with good tolerability. The post hoc observation of activity in patients with acquired resistance (after prior benefit from cetuximab monotherapy) may warrant further investigation.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) frequently affects elderly patients. Given the frailty and comorbid conditions of this population as well as the potential toxicities associated with treatment, there is a risk of undertreatment in older patients. However, there is growing evidence that benefit with standard treatment is similar in the elderly and in younger patients. Few prospective trials specifically target the elderly, which forces clinicians to rely on subgroup analyses and retrospective data. Therefore, adequate pretreatment assessments are vital to anticipate factors that may contribute to morbidity during therapy. In addition, supportive care during treatment is essential. For patients of all ages who present with early or localized disease, curative treatment should be offered whenever possible. With more precise surgical and radiologic techniques, the ability to provide curative treatment while minimizing long-term toxicity has greatly improved. Not only our techniques but also our understanding of the disease have improved. Human papillomavirus (HPV)–related HNSCC has changed the treatment paradigm of advanced-stage disease because of the inherently better prognosis compared with tobacco- and alcohol-related HNSCC. How this will affect early-stage disease remains to be seen, but de-escalated therapy may prove a suitable strategy in eligible elderly patients. With improved therapies and understanding of the disease, additional prospective trials must be carried out in the elderly population.

Objective: To analyze patient-reported swallowing difficulties, healthcare resource utilization and associated costs during the PROCLAIM study. Methods: Patients with stage III non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer received pemetrexed-cisplatin (PemCis) combined with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy followed by consolidation pemetrexed, or concurrent chemoradiotherapy with etoposide-cisplatin (EtoCis) followed by standard consolidation chemotherapy. Patient - reported swallowing function was measured using diaries. Resource utilization (hospitalizations, transfusions, concomitant medications) was compared between treatment arms using Fisher’s exact test and independent t-test. Medical resource use costs were analyzed using nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: Patient-reported difficulty in swallowing function (diary score ≥4) was 33.8% in the PemCis arm and 29% in the EtoCis arm. Overall resource use, including hospitalizations, was similar between treatment arms; however, fewer patients in the PemCis arm received transfusions and selected concomitant medications. Concurrent phase analyses were consistent with the overall study. A significantly lower percentage of patients (31.1% vs. 40.8%) were hospitalized in the PemCis arm. Total costs were significantly higher in the PemCis arm. Other medical costs (excluding study treatment costs) during the concurrent phase were lower for patients in the PemCis arm, due to significantly lower hospitalization costs and lower use of concomitant medications. Subgroup analysis yielded similar results. Conclusions: Patient-reported difficulty in swallowing post-baseline and resource utilization were consistent with previously reported safety outcomes. In the overall study, higher total costs for PemCis were driven by study drug cost. When adjusting for treatment duration, other monthly medical costs were favorable to PemCis. Patients on pemetrexed remained longer on therapy, suggesting better tolerability. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00686959.

Nivolumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) vs investigator's choice (IC) of chemotherapy at the primary analysis of randomized, open-label, phase 3 CheckMate 141 in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Here, we report that OS benefit with nivolumab was maintained at a minimum follow-up of 11.4 months. Further, OS benefit with nivolumab vs IC was also noted among patients who received first-line treatment for R/M SCCHN after progressing on platinum therapy for locally advanced disease in the adjuvant or primary (i.e., with radiation) setting.

Objectives Definitive chemoradiation (CRT) for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OC-SCC) is often criticized for poor efficacy or toxicity. We describe a favorable 20-year experience of primary CRT for locally-advanced OC-SCC. Materials and Methods Patients with locally-advanced, stage III/IV OC-SCC receiving primary concomitant CRT on protocols from 1994 to 2014 were analyzed. Chemotherapy included fluorouracil and hydroxyurea with other third agents. Radiotherapy (RT) was delivered once or twice daily to a maximum dose of 70–75 Gy. Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) was exclusively used after 2004. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LRC), and distant control (DC) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared across treatment decades using the log-rank test. Rates of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) requiring surgery were compared across treatment decades using the Chi-square test. Results 140 patients with locally-advanced OC-SCC were treated with definitive CRT. Of these, 75.7% had T3/T4 disease, 68.6% had ≥N2 nodal disease, and 91.4% had stage IV disease. Most common primary sites were oral tongue (47.9%) and floor of mouth (24.3%). Median follow-up was 5.7 years. Five-year OS, PFS, LRC, and DC were 63.2%, 58.7%, 78.6%, and 87.2%, respectively. Rates of ORN and long-term feeding tube dependence were 20.7% and 10.0%, respectively. Differences in LRC (P = 0.90), DC (P = 0.24), PFS (P = 0.38), OS (P = 0.10), or ORN (P = 0.38) were not significant across treatment decades. Conclusion Definitive CRT is a viable and feasible strategy for organ preservation for patients with locally-advanced OC-SCC.

PurposeTo investigate the safety of accelerated hypofractionated radiation therapy (AHRT) with concurrent chemotherapy (CT) for inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methodsThe primary objectives were to define the maximally tolerable course of accelerated radiation therapy and to describe toxicities of therapy. Total radiation therapy remained at 60Gy. The number of once-daily fractions in each successive cohort was reduced as follows: cohort 1, 60Gy in 27 fractions; cohort 2, 60Gy in 24 fractions; cohort 3, 60Gy in 22 fractions; and cohort 4, 60Gy in 20 fractions. Concurrent treatment consisted of weekly carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 2 and paclitaxel 45mg/m2. Consolidation treatment consisted of carboplatin AUC 6 and paclitaxel 200mg/m2 every weeks×2 cycles. Maximum tolerated dose: Of 6 patients/cohort, ≤2 patients experienced grade ≥3 toxicity, and ≤1 patient experienced grade ≥4 toxicity.Results22 patients were accrued; of those, 21 patients were evaluable between July 2012 and May 2014. Grade 5 toxicity occurred in 3 patients: 1 patient in cohort 2 (hemoptysis), 2 patients in cohort 3 (hemoptysis, pneumonitis). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined by cohort 2 (60Gy in 2.5Gy/fraction). Time to grade 5 toxicity was 9months, 6months, and 9months after the start of treatment. The median follow-up time was 23.0months (range, 7.6-30.6months) in living patients, the median overall survival was 19.3months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.3-34.0months), and the median progression-free survival was 12.2months (95% CI 6.1-22.5months).ConclusionsOnly modest hypofractionation was achievable as a result of long-term toxicities. Nevertheless, the MTD of 60Gy given at 2.5Gy/fraction allows completion of RT in 20% fewer treatments than conventional therapy. Further investigation of AHRT may help to better define the therapeutic index.

Lung cancer is a devastating disease with overall bleak prognosis. Current methods to diagnose lung cancer are rather invasive and are inadequate to detect the disease at an early stage when treatment is likely to be most effective. In this study, a shotgun sequencing approach was used to study the microRNA (miRNA) cargo of serum-derived exosomes of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (n=9) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n=11) patients, and healthy controls (n=10). The study has identified 17 miRNA species that are differentially expressed in cancer patients and control subjects. Furthermore, within the patient groups, a set of miRNAs were differentially expressed in exosomal samples obtained before and after chemotherapy treatment. This manuscript demonstrates the potential of exosomal miRNAs for developing noninvasive tests for disease differentiation and treatment monitoring in lung cancer patients.

Background Long-term data with immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited. Two phase III trials demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) and a favorable safety profile with the anti-programmed death-1 antibody nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced squamous (CheckMate 017) and nonsquamous (CheckMate 057) NSCLC. We report results from ≥3 years’ follow-up, including subgroup analyses of patients with liver metastases, who historically have poorer prognosis among patients with NSCLC. Patients and methods Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) until progression or discontinuation. The primary end point of each study was OS. Patients with baseline liver metastases were pooled across studies by treatment for subgroup analyses. Results After 40.3 months’ minimum follow-up in CheckMate 017 and 057, nivolumab continued to show an OS benefit versus docetaxel: estimated 3-year OS rates were 17% [95% confidence interval (CI), 14% to 21%] versus 8% (95% CI, 6% to 11%) in the pooled population with squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC. Nivolumab was generally well tolerated, with no new safety concerns identified. Of 854 randomized patients across both studies, 193 had baseline liver metastases. Nivolumab resulted in improved OS compared with docetaxel in patients with liver metastases (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50–0.91), consistent with findings from the overall pooled study population (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61–0.81). Rates of treatment-related hepatic adverse events (primarily grade 1–2 liver enzyme elevations) were slightly higher in nivolumab-treated patients with liver metastases (10%) than in the overall pooled population (6%). Conclusions After 3 years’ minimum follow-up, nivolumab continued to demonstrate an OS benefit versus docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC. Similarly, nivolumab demonstrated an OS benefit versus docetaxel in patients with liver metastases, and remained well tolerated. Clinical trial registration CheckMate 017: NCT01642004; CheckMate 057: NCT01673867.

Background Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations are associated with multiple cancers. Current EGFR-directed therapies have led to increased efficacy but are associated with specific side effects. The antibody-drug conjugate depatuxizumab mafodotin (depatux-m) targets EGFR with a monoclonal antibody linked to a cytotoxin, and is highly tumor-specific. Methods This phase 1/2 study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of depatux-m in patients who had advanced solid tumors with known wild-type EGFR overexpression, amplification, or mutated EGFR variant III. A 3 + 3 dose escalation was used, and 2 dosing schedules were evaluated. Depatux-m also was manufactured under an alternate process to reduce the drug load and improve the safety profile, and it was tested at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). In another cohort, prolonged infusion time of depatux-m was evaluated; and a cohort with confirmed EGFR amplification also was evaluated at the MTD. Results Fifty-six patients were treated. The MTD and the recommended phase 2 dose for depatux-m was 3.0 mg/kg. Common adverse events (AEs) were blurred vision (48%) and fatigue (41%). A majority of patients (66%) experienced 1 or more ocular AEs. Grade 3 or 4 AEs were observed in 43% of patients. One patient with EGFR-amplified, triple-negative breast cancer had a partial response. Stable disease was observed in 23% of patients. Pharmacokinetics revealed that depatux-m exposures were approximately dose-proportional. Conclusions Depatux-m resulted in infrequent nonocular AEs but increased ocular AEs. Patient follow-up confirmed that ocular AEs were reversible. Lowering the drug-antibody ratio did not decrease the number of ocular AEs. A partial response in 1 patient with EGFR-amplified disease provides the opportunity to study depatux-m in diseases with a high incidence of EGFR amplification. Cancer 2018;124:2174-83. © 2018 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Background Favorable prognosis for Human papillomavirus-associated (HPV+) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) led to investigation of response-adaptive de-escalation, yet long-term outcomes are unknown. We present expanded experience and follow-up of risk/response adaptive treatment de-intensification in HPV+ OPC. Methods A phase 2 trial (OPTIMA) and subsequent cohort of sequential off-protocol patients treated from September 2014 to November 2018 at the University of Chicago were reviewed. Eligible patients had T3-T4 or N2-3 (AJCC 7th edition) HPV+ OPC. Patients were stratified by risk: High-risk (HR) (T4, ≥N2c, or >10PYH), all others low-risk (LR). Induction chemotherapy (IC) included 3 cycles of carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel (OPTIMA) or paclitaxel (off-protocol). LR with ≥50% response received low-dose radiotherapy (RT) alone to 50 Gy (RT50). LR with 30–50% response and HR with ≥50% response received intermediate-dose chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to 45 Gy (CRT45). All others received full-dose CRT to 75 Gy (CRT75). Results 91 patients consented and 90 patients were treated, of which 31% had >10PYH, 34% had T3/4 disease, and 94% had N2b/N2c/N3 disease. 49% were LR and 51% were HR. Overall response rate to induction was 88%. De-escalated treatment was administered to 83%. Median follow-up was 4.2 years. Five-year OS, PFS, LRC, and DC were 90% (95% CI 81,95), 90% (95% CI 80,95), 96% (95% CI 90,99), and 96% (88,99) respectively. G-tube placement rates in RT50, CRT45, and CRT75 were 3%, 33%, and 80% respectively (p Conclusion Risk/response adaptive de-escalated treatment for an inclusive cohort of HPV+ OPC demonstrates excellent survival with reduced toxicity with long-term follow-up.

Purpose/Objective(s) Combination SBRT and immune checkpoint inhibition is safe and efficacious for metastatic NSCLC. It is unknown whether the site of metastatic disease at diagnosis or SBRT response can be used as predictors of PFS or OS. We report follow-up from a prospective phase I clinical trial examining predictors of OS and PFS based on initial metastatic tumor disease location, as well as SBRT response. Materials/Methods Thirty-seven patients with treatment-naive metastatic NSCLC were reviewed. Patients received SBRT to doses of 30-50 Gy in 3-5 fractions to 1-6 metastases, as well as concurrent (immunotherapy with SBRT) or sequential (immunotherapy after completion of SBRT) nivolumab/ipilimumab on a phase I clinical trial at a single institution. All metastatic lesions were evaluated and the sites of initial disease, including liver, bone, or thoracic only metastases, were evaluated to determine if those sites influenced OS or PFS. Treated metastases control (TMC) was defined as lack of progression for irradiated metastases. Landmark analysis was used to assess correlation of TMC and OS. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze OS and PFS. Results Thirty-seven patients with 120 evaluable metastases were enrolled with a median follow-up of 17.0 months. Patients who had liver metastases at baseline (n = 8) were found to have a worse PFS (log-rank P = 0.048), but no difference in OS (log-rank P = 0.243) when compared to patients who did not have liver metastases at baseline (n = 29). There was a trend toward significance for better PFS in patients who had thoracic only metastases at baseline (n = 6) compared to patients that had extra-thoracic metastases (n = 31) at baseline (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon P = 0.061); however, there was no difference in OS. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS or OS for patients with bone metastases (n = 9) at baseline compared to patients who did not have bone metastases at baseline (n = 28). One- and two-year TMC were 93.8% and 91.7%, respectively. TMC corresponded to better OS (log-rank P = 0.040). Conclusion Liver metastases present at diagnosis in metastatic NSCLC correlate with worse PFS. Treated metastases control rates also correlate with OS. These metrics may help predict outcomes and inform whether additional aggressive therapy is required for patients with metastatic NSCLC.

Purpose/Objective(s) We report mature outcomes of LSCLC patients randomized to the 61.2 Gy CB TRT arm of CALGB 30610/RTOG 0538. The study initially included 2 experimental arms, 61.2 Gy CB TRT over 5 weeks and 70 Gy daily (QD) over 7 weeks, both with higher predicted biologic efficacy than standard 45 Gy twice-daily (BID)TRT. The CB arm was discontinued after planned early interim analysis comparing toxicity in the experimental arms, but the study provides the largest prospective dataset assessing 61.2 Gy CB TRT in LSCLC Materials/Methods Eligible patients had LSCLC with regional lymph node involvement, excluding contralateral hilar and supraclavicular nodes, and ECOG PS 0-2. TRT began with either the first or 2nd (of 4 total) cycle of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and prophylactic cranial radiotherapy was recommended in cases of complete (or near complete) response. In the initial phase of the trial, patients were randomized with a 1:1:1 allocation to 45 Gy BID, 70 Gy QD and 61.2 Gy CB TRT. A decision to drop an experimental arm was mandated after toxicity data was available for approximately 70 patients in each cohort. Although toxicity was similar in both experimental arms, a decision was made to discontinue the 61.2 Gy cohort after discussion with the DSMB. Results From March 2008 until March 2013 (when the cohort was discontinued), 93 patients were assigned to receive 61.2 Gy CB TRT. The median age was 62 years (range 41 to 77), the majority of patients were Caucasian (86%), male (51%), ECOG PS 0-1 (95%). Most patients started TRT with the first chemotherapy cycle (65%) and had 3D planning (63%). After median follow up of 7 years for surviving patients, median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival were 32.3 months (95% CI: 21.1-44.8) and 15.6 months (95% CI: 10.0-27.5), respectively. Two-year OS was 57% (95% CI: 0.47-0.68), with 28% OS (95% CI: 0.2-0.4) at 5 years. Rates of grade 3 and 4 hematologic adverse events (AEs) were 20.5% and 59.1%, with 40.9% and 25% Grade 3 and 4 non-hematologic AEs. Grade 3+ dysphagia and dyspnea were 16% and 7%, respectively. There were 4 Grade 5 AEs, including one patient with febrile neutropenia. Conclusion Outcomes are similar to the contemporaneous CONVERT trial, and compare favorably to the prior phase II trial examining 61.2 Gy CB TRT (RTOG 0239) in LSCLC, despite the allowance of early stage (N0) disease in those studies. The improvement in OS compared with RTOG 0239 is likely attributed to improved staging and advances in radiotherapy planning and delivery, though additional factors may have contributed. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; U10CA180868 (NRG), U10CA180888 (SWOG); https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Clinicaltrials.gov Id: NCT00632853

Introduction The sequence of chemotherapy and pembrolizumab may affect antitumor immune response and efficacy of immunotherapy. Methods This multicenter, randomized, phase 2 trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of two sequences of chemotherapy and pembrolizumab in patients with stage 4 NSCLC. Both arms were considered investigational, and the study used a “pick a winner” design. The primary end point was objective response rate by independent radiologic review after eight cycles (24 wk). Patients were randomized 1:1 to arm A (chemotherapy for four cycles followed by pembrolizumab for four cycles) or arm B (pembrolizumab for four cycles followed by chemotherapy for four cycles). Patients in both arms without disease progression after the initial eight cycles continued pembrolizumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a maximum of 2 years. Results From March 2016 to July 2018, a total of 90 eligible patients were randomized (43 patients to arm A and 47 patients to arm B). The objective response rate at 24 weeks in arms A and B was 39.5 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 24.9%–54.1 %) and 40.4 % (95 % CI: 26.4%–54.5 %), respectively (p = 0.93). The progression-free survival in arms A and B was as follows: hazard ratio of B versus A equals to 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.68–1.66, p value equals to 0.84, and median progression-free survival of 5.8 months and 4 months, respectively. The overall survival was as follows: hazard ratio of B versus A equals to 1.04, 95 % CI: 0.63–1.74, p value equals to 0.85, and median overall survival of 15.5 months and 14 months, respectively. Conclusions Additional evaluation of either sequence in a phase 3 trial is not warranted.

Importance Unreported clinical trial results represent a violation of human rights. Oncology trials account for nearly 30% of interventional biopharmaceutical clinical studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and are the most numerous among all disciplines. Objective To analyze the reporting of results among all interventional oncology trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from 2007 through 2017. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study analyzed all clinical studies registered between June 1, 2007, and May 8, 2017, on ClinicalTrials.gov, the largest public clinical trial registry in the world. Trials with a recruitment status of completed or terminated and a primary completion date of on or before September 30, 2017, were selected. Data were analyzed between February 20, 2021, and February 26, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was the percentage of trials that reported results either on ClinicalTrials.gov or in journal publications within 24 months of the primary completion date. Journal publication was ascertained by searching ClinicalTrials.gov for a link to the publication, PubMed using national clinical trial number, and Embase using national clinical trial number and filters. Results Of the 12 240 clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 7425 trials (60.7%; 95% CI, 60.0%-61.5%) reported results, with a 34.0% (95% CI, 30.3%-37.7%) increase in 24-month reporting rate from 2007 to 2017. Multivariable analyses confirmed that more recent trials (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 per year increase; 95% CI, 1.10-1.13) and trials with larger sample sizes (51-100 patients: adjusted HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.09-1.24]; >100 patients: adjusted HR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.33-1.54]) were more likely to report results. Terminated trials were less likely to report results compared with completed trials (adjusted HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93). Compared with trials funded by industry, those funded by the National Institutes of Health were more likely to report results (adjusted HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.29-1.49), whereas those funded by other academic or nonprofit organizations were less likely to report results (adjusted HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.62-0.70). Among all 7425 trials, the results of 2807 trials (37.8%; 95% CI, 36.7%-38.9%) were posted only on ClinicalTrials.gov. These trials tended to be terminated early and to have small sample sizes (≤50 patients) compared with trials that published results in journals. Conclusions and Relevance This study found a gradual improvement in results reporting among oncology trials over a 10-year period. Trial registries could serve as a results reporting platform for unpublished trials and as a data source of trial outcomes for future studies.

8505 Background: Although level 1 evidence is lacking, the majority of patients (pts) with LSCLC are treated with a high dose QD TRT regimen in clinical practice. CALGB 30610/RTOG 0538 was designed to determine if administering high dose TRT would improve overall survival (OS), compared with standard 45 Gy BID TRT, in LSCLC pts treated with chemoradiotherapy. Methods: Eligible pts had LSCLC, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2 and regional lymph node involvement excluding contralateral hilar or supraclavicular nodes. This phase 3 trial was conducted in 2 stages. In the first stage, pts were randomized 1:1:1 to 45 Gy BID over 3 weeks, 70 Gy QD over 7 weeks, or 61.2 Gy concomitant boost (CB) over 5 weeks. For the second stage, the study planned discontinuation of one high dose arm based on interim toxicity analysis with patients then randomized 1:1 in the two remaining arms. TRT was given starting with either the 1st or 2nd (of 4 total) chemotherapy cycles. The primary endpoint was OS measured from date of randomization. Results: The trial opened 03/15/2008 and closed 12/01/2019 upon completing accrual, with the CB arm discontinued 3/11/2013 after interim analysis. This analysis includes 638 pts randomized to 45 Gy BID TRT (n = 313) or 70 Gy QD TRT (n = 325). Median age was 63 years (range 37-81), the majority of pts were Caucasian (86%), female (52%), and with ECOG PS 0-1 (95%). After median follow-up of 2.84 years (IQR:1.35 -5.61) for surviving pts, QD compared to BID did not result in a significant difference in OS (HR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.76-1.2, p = 0.9). Median, 2- and 4-year OS for QD were 30.5 months (95% CI: 24.4-39.6), 56% (95% CI: 0.51-0.62), and 39% (95% CI: 0.33-0.45), and for BID 28.7 months (95% CI: 26.2-35.5), 59% (95% CI: 0.53-0.65), and 35% (95% CI: 0.29-0.42). QD also did not result in a significant difference in PFS (HR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.78-1.18, p = 0.94). Most grade 3+ hematologic and non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) were similar between cohorts. Rates of grade 3+ febrile neutropenia, dyspnea, esophageal pain and dysphagia for QD were 12.6%,7%, 11.6% and 11.3%, and for BID 13.6%, 4%, 11.2 % and 9.5%. Grade 5 AEs were reported in 3.7% and 1.7% of the QD and BID cohorts, respectively. Results will be updated at presentation. Conclusions: High dose QD TRT to 70 Gy did not significantly improve OS compared with standard 45 Gy BID TRT. Nevertheless, favorable outcomes on the QD arm provide the most robust evidence available supporting high dose once-daily TRT as an acceptable option in LSCLC. Outcomes from this study, the largest conducted in LSCLC to date, will help guide TRT decisions for this patient population. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; Clinical trial information: NCT00632853.

8513 Background: A minority of the approximately 40,000 US patients diagnosed annually with stage III NSCLC can be cured by concurrent CRT. Standard adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improve outcome for those patients who complete CRT with good performance status (PS) and without disease progression, but most patients diagnosed with unresectable stage III NSCLC will not meet the criteria for adjuvant ICI. AFT-16 investigated safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant atezolizumab as a strategy that may allow more patients to benefit from ICI. Methods: Eligible patients received 4 cycles (cy) of atezolizumab 1200 mg IV q 21 days followed by CRT with 60 Gy + weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP), CP consolidation and adjuvant atezolizumab to complete 1 year of therapy (17 cy). The primary endpoint of disease control rate at 12 weeks (wks) has been reported. Secondary endpoints reported here include overall response rate, safety, and progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS) measured from the start of induction therapy. Correlative science data and quality of life endpoints will be reported elsewhere. Results: 64 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, PS 0-1 and no active autoimmune disease or significant organ dysfunction were enrolled at 13 Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology sites from 11/2017 to 7/2019. 62 patients who received at least one dose of atezolizumab are included in this analysis. Median age was 63.9 years (range 38.1-86.5). Patients were 51.6% female, 77.4% white, 88.7% current & former smokers and 56.5% PS 0. All patients are off study treatment. Mean cycles of treatment received was 9 (1-17). 46 patients were alive at median follow up 24.1 mo (range 3 – 34.1 mo). PFS at 12 and 18 mo from start of induction atezolizumab was 66% (95%CI 55-79) and 57% (95%CI 45-71) respectively. Median PFS was 23.7 mo (95%CI 13.2-NE). OS at 18 mo was 84% (95%CI 75-94). Median OS is not yet estimable. Atezolizumab was well tolerated. One grade (gr) 4 Guillain-Barre syndrome and 1 each gr 3 pneumonia, pneumonitis and colitis were attributable to neoadjuvant atezolizumab. The remaining 9 severe adverse events were unrelated to ICI. Conclusions: Atezolizumab prior to and following CRT for stage III unresectable NSCLC was well tolerated with encouraging PFS and OS without unexpected safety signals. Analysis of correlative endpoints and quality of life are ongoing. Further study of induction atezolizumab is warranted in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Support: https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org ; Clinical trial information: NCT03102242.

6011 Background: Despite the success of anti-PD-1 in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, incorporation in the curative setting with induction therapy has yet to be investigated. Favorable prognosis of human papillomavirus associated (HPV+) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) has led to interest in treatment de-escalation. OPTIMA 2 evaluated nivolumab (nivo) with nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by risk/response adaptive de-intensified treatment for locoregionally advanced HPV+ OPC. We report the primary analysis and outcomes. Methods: OPTIMA 2 enrolled locoregionally advanced HPV+ OPC. Nivo, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin were administered for 3 cycles. High-risk (HR) included any of the following: T4, N2c-N3 (AJCC 7th edition), > 20 pack year smoking history, non-HPV16 subtype; All others were low-risk (LR). Arm A included LR with ≥50% post-induction shrinkage by RECIST received single-modality de-escalation with low-dose radiation (RT) alone (50 Gy) or transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Arm B included HR with ≥50% shrinkage or LR with

6048 Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a primary factor driving the increasing incidence of OPSCC. As patients with HPV+ OPSCC show significantly improved treatment response and prognosis, there is an urgent need to de-escalate treatment of HPV+ OPSCC that optimizes oncologic control while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. Cell-free HPV DNA (cfHPV-DNA) from plasma specimens represents a promising noninvasive surrogate of disease burden in these patients. To enable cfHPV-DNA analysis as a strategy to monitor response to therapy and guide treatment de-escalation, we developed a highly sensitive assay for HPV16/18 detection and quantification in plasma, based on the SafeSEQ next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. Methods: Longitudinal plasma samples were collected from patients with locoregional HPV+ OPSCC treated on our institutional de-escalation protocol of induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by risk/response stratified de-escalated locoregional therapy, OPTIMA 2 (NCT03107182). Neck CT or MRI was obtained for all patients at baseline and following induction chemoimmunotherapy; radiographic response to induction therapy was assessed per RECIST 1.1 criteria. cfHPV-DNA was quantified in plasma samples collected at baseline and at the end of induction therapy. Changes in cfHPV-DNA levels were correlated with radiographic response. Results: The SafeSEQ HPV assay demonstrates high analytical sensitivity, with ability to detect a single copy of HPV DNA. Replicate testing of contrived samples containing HPV 16/18 DNA at defined levels revealed robust quantitative detection across a dynamic range over 5 orders of magnitude. The assay showed a low level of background signal ( < 0.04 copies per sample) across 20 healthy donor samples, indicating high specificity. In plasma samples collected at baseline from patients enrolled in OPTIMA 2, cfHPV-DNA was detected at levels ranging from 1 to > 30,000 copies/ml. A high correlation was observed between dynamic changes in patients’ cfHPV-DNA levels and radiographic responses following induction therapy. Furthermore, in samples collected longitudinally during induction therapy, changes in cfHPV-DNA levels accurately tracked radiographic responses to therapy. Conclusions: We have developed a highly sensitive and specific cfHPV-DNA detection assay based on SafeSEQ NGS technology and have successfully applied it to monitor therapeutic response in HPV+ OPSCC patients. The assay exhibits robust quantitative detection of HPV across a broad range of levels, even when only a few copies are present, enabling high-resolution molecular monitoring. Prospective studies are underway to further evaluate the kinetics of cfHPV-DNA as a predictor of response to therapy in order to more precisely guide the management of patients with HPV+ OPSCC.

6027 Background: In this study we develop post-treatment imaging surveillance schedules for locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) specific to the unique recurrence patterns of tumor stage and HPV status, using mathematical models. Current post-treatment imaging surveillance recommendations for OPC are not evidence based. The exception is the use of a positron emission tomography (PET) scan at 3 months post-treatment, after which practice across institutions diverge. An optimized and personalized surveillance schedule for OPC patients can minimize costs and diagnostic delays. Methods: A Markov multi-state model defining local and distant recurrences was trained using 2159 patients from the National Cancer Database. Patients from 2010-2015 treated at an academic or major cancer center with curative radiotherapy were included. Tumors must have been stage III to IVB (AJCC 7th edition) with known p16/HPV status. Model performance was then successfully externally validated using the 2016 International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S) study. Optimized radiographic surveillance schedules were created using this model, assuming a PET at month 3 and including 0 to 6 additional computed tomography (CT) scans of the neck and chest. Optimization was done for minimization of latency, defined as time between disease recurrence and radiographic discovery. Results: Model-selected schedules varied significantly from commonly utilized-surveillance schedules (such as imaging every 3 months within the first year from treatment) and showed lower mean diagnostic latency for every stage and HPV status (shown in Table). In the lowest risk cohort (Stage III HPV+), the optimized schedule had a sensitivity of 65% and latency of 3.1 months. In the highest risk group (Stage IVB HPV-), the optimized schedule had a sensitivity of 76% and latency of 1.9 months. Conclusions: Mathematical model optimization for HPV status and stage is feasible and produces non-intuitive results. These results could be used to inform surveillance if payors reimburse for fewer total scans. Across all cohorts, each added CT scan increases surveillance sensitivity and decreases latency. Incorporation of physical exam and direct visualization results into the model are still needed. Future steps include cost effectiveness research and prospective clinical trials.[Table: see text]

8503 Background: CheckMate 816 (NCT02998528) is a randomized phase 3 study of neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo vs chemo in resectable NSCLC. The study met its first primary endpoint, demonstrating significantly improved pathological complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo. Here we report key surgical outcomes from the study. Methods: Adults with stage IB (≥ 4 cm)–IIIA (per AJCC 7th ed) resectable NSCLC, ECOG PS ≤ 1, and no known EGFR/ ALK alterations were randomized to NIVO 360 mg + platinum-doublet chemo Q3W or chemo Q3W for 3 cycles (n = 179 each). Definitive surgery was to be performed within 6 weeks of treatment. Primary endpoints are pCR (defined as 0% viable tumor cells in lung and lymph nodes) and event-free survival; both are evaluated by blinded independent review. Feasibility of surgery and surgery-related adverse events (AEs) are exploratory endpoints. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between arms; 64% of patients (pts) were stage IIIA. Definitive surgery rates were 83% with NIVO + chemo (n = 149) vs 75% with chemo (n = 135). Reasons for cancelled surgery were disease progression (12 and 17 pts, respectively), AEs (2 pts/arm), or other scenarios (14 and 19 pts, respectively; including pt refusal, unresectability, poor lung function). Minimally invasive surgery rates were 30% and 22%, and conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery rates were 11% and 16% for NIVO + chemo and chemo, respectively. Lobectomy was performed in 77% vs 61% of pts, and pneumonectomy in 17% and 25% for NIVO + chemo vs chemo, respectively. AEs were responsible for delays of surgery in 6 pts in the NIVO + chemo arm and 9 pts in the chemo arm. An R0 resection was achieved in 83% vs 78% of pts and median residual viable tumor (RVT) cells in the primary tumor bed were 10% vs 74% for NIVO + chemo vs chemo. There was no increase in median (Q1, Q3) duration of surgery and length of hospitalization between NIVO + chemo vs chemo (184 [130, 252] vs 217 [150, 283] min; and 10.0 [7, 14] vs 10.0 [7, 14] days, respectively). Any-grade and grade 3–4 surgery-related AEs were reported in 41% vs 47% and 11% vs 15% of the NIVO + chemo vs chemo arms, respectively. Grade 5 surgery-related AEs were reported in 2 vs 0 pts in the NIVO + chemo vs chemo arms; 0 vs 3 pts died due to treatment-related AEs, respectively. Conclusions: In CheckMate 816, neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo did not impede the feasibility and timing of surgery, nor the extent or completeness of resection vs chemo alone; treatment was tolerable and did not increase surgical complications. NIVO + chemo led to increased depth of pathological response. The surgical outcome data from CheckMate 816 along with significant improvement in pCR support NIVO + chemo as a potential neoadjuvant option for patients with stage IB to IIIA resectable NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT02998528.