1. Which assessments are used to analyze neuromuscular control by electromyography after an anterior cruciate ligament injury to determine readiness to return to sports? A systematic review
- Author
-
Dirk Vissers, Heiner Baur, Isabel Baert, Irene Koenig, and Angela Blasimann
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Sports medicine ,Anterior cruciate ligament ,medicine.medical_treatment ,MEDLINE ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Anterior cruciate ligament injuries ,Electromyography ,Cochrane Library ,RTS ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,Neuromuscular control ,EMG ,Medicine ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Knee ,Patient outcome assessment ,Rehabilitation ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Research ,Return to sports ,ACL ,Confounding ,medicine.disease ,musculoskeletal system ,ACL injury ,Checklist ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Systematic review ,Human medicine ,business ,RC1200-1245 - Abstract
Background Adequate neuromuscular control of the knee could be one element to prevent secondary injuries after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. To assess neuromuscular control in terms of time, amplitude and activity, electromyography (EMG) is used. However, it is unclear which assessments using EMG could be used for a safe return to sports (RTS). Therefore, we aimed to summarize EMG-related assessments for neuromuscular control of the knee in adult patients after an ACL injury to decide upon readiness for RTS. Methods This systematic review followed guidelines of Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane recommendations. MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), SPORTDiscus and the Web of Science were searched from inception to March 2019 and updated in November 2020. Studies identifying electromyographic assessments for neuromuscular control during dynamic tasks in adult, physically active patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury were eligible and qualitatively synthesized. Two independent reviewers used a modified Downs and Black checklist to assess risk of bias of included studies. Results From initially 1388 hits, 38 mainly cross-sectional, case-controlled studies were included for qualitative analysis. Most studies provided EMG outcomes of thigh muscles during jumping, running or squatting. Outcomes measures described neuromuscular control of the knee in domains of time, amplitude or activity. Risk of bias was medium to high due to an unclear description of participants and prior interventions, confounding factors and incompletely reported results. Conclusions Despite a wide range of EMG outcome measures for neuromuscular control, none was used to decide upon return to sports in these patients. Additional studies are needed to define readiness towards RTS by assessing neuromuscular control in adult ACL patients with EMG. Further research should aim at finding reliable and valid, EMG-related variables to be used as diagnostic tool for neuromuscular control. Moreover, future studies should aim at more homogenous groups including adequately matched healthy subjects, evaluate gender separately and use sport-specific tasks. Registration The protocol for this systematic review was indexed beforehand in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) and registered as CRD42019122188.
- Published
- 2021