Search

BackgroundTo determine the safety and efficacy of the anti-colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (anti-CSF1R) monoclonal antibody AMG 820 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with select solid tumors.Patients and methodsPatients had advanced, refractory mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with low (ResultsOverall, 116 patients received ≥1 dose of AMG 820 plus pembrolizumab (18 at 1400 mg AMG 820; 98 at 1100 mg AMG 820). Most patients (64%) were male; the median age was 64 (range 30–86) years. Seven patients had DLTs (1 at 1400 mg AMG 820; 6 at 1100 mg AMG 820). Almost all patients (99.1%) had AEs, 87.9% with grade ≥3 AEs. The most common AEs were increased aspartate aminotransferase (59.5%), fatigue (48.3%), periorbital/face edema (48.3%), and rash/maculopapular rash (37.1%). The best response was immune-related partial response in 3 patients (3%; duration of response 9.2, 10.0, 12.5 months) and immune-related stable disease in 39 patients (34%). None of the completed phase II cohorts met the predefined threshold for efficacy. Post-treatment there was accumulation of serum colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) and interleukin-34, reduction in CSF1-dependent CD16-expressing monocytes, and increased PD-L1 expression and CD4 and CD8 cell numbers in tumor biopsies.ConclusionsThe recommended combination dose of 1100 mg AMG 820 plus 200 mg pembrolizumab had an acceptable safety profile. Although pharmacodynamic effects were observed, antitumor activity was insufficient for further evaluation of this combination in selected patient populations.Trial registration numberNCT02713529

BACKGROUND Blinatumomab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody construct that enables CD3-positive T cells to recognize and eliminate CD19-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) blasts, was approved for use in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor ALL on the basis of single-group trials that showed efficacy and manageable toxic effects. METHODS In this multi-institutional phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with heavily pre-treated B-cell precursor ALL, in a 2: 1 ratio, to receive either blinatumomab or standardof- care chemotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS Of the 405 patients who were randomly assigned to receive blinatumomab (271 patients) or chemotherapy (134 patients), 376 patients received at least one dose. Overall survival was significantly longer in the blinatumomab group than in the chemotherapy group. The median overall survival was 7.7 months in the blinatumomab group and 4.0 months in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for death with blinatumomab vs. chemotherapy, 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 0.93; P = 0.01). Remission rates within 12 weeks after treatment initiation were significantly higher in the blinatumomab group than in the chemotherapy group, both with respect to complete remission with full hematologic recovery (34% vs. 16%, P

Recent advances in antibody technology to harness T cells for cancer immunotherapy, particularly in the difficult-to-treat setting of relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r ALL), have led to innovative methods for directing cytotoxic T cells to specific surface antigens on cancer cells. One approach involves administration of soluble bispecific (or dual-affinity) antibody-based constructs that temporarily bridge T cells and cancer cells. Another approach infuses ex vivo-engineered T cells that express a surface plasma membrane-inserted antibody construct called a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR). Both bispecific antibodies and CARs circumvent natural target cell recognition by creating a physical connection between cytotoxic T cells and target cancer cells to activate a cytolysis signaling pathway; this connection allows essentially all cytotoxic T cells in a patient to be engaged because typical tumor cell resistance mechanisms (such as T-cell receptor specificity, antigen processing and presentation, and major histocompatibility complex context) are bypassed. Both the bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody construct blinatumomab and CD19-CARs are immunotherapies that have yielded encouraging remission rates in CD19-positive r/r ALL, suggesting that they might serve as definitive treatments or bridging therapies to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. With the introduction of these immunotherapies, new challenges arise related to unique toxicities and distinctive pathways of resistance. An increasing body of knowledge is being accumulated on how to predict, prevent, and manage such toxicities, which will help to better stratify patient risk and tailor treatments to minimize severe adverse events. A deeper understanding of the precise mechanisms of action and immune resistance, interaction with other novel agents in potential combinations, and optimization in the manufacturing process will help to advance immunotherapy outcomes in the r/r ALL setting.

Minimal residual disease (MRD), where leukemic cell levels are lower than the morphologic detection threshold, is the most important prognostic factor for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) relapse during first-line chemotherapy treatment and is standard of care in treatment monitoring and decision making. Limited data are available on the prognostic value of MRD response after relapse. We evaluated the relationship between MRD response and outcomes in blinatumomab-treated adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor ALL. Of 90 patients with complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), 64 (71.1%) achieved a complete MRD response (no detectable individual rearrangements of immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor genes by polymerase chain reaction [PCR] at a minimum sensitivity level of 10(−4)). Eleven patients had MRD

Summary Background Adults with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia have an unfavourable prognosis. Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager antibody construct targeting CD19, an antigen consistently expressed on B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukaemia cells. We aimed to confirm the activity and safety profile of blinatumomab for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Methods In a multicentre, single-arm, open-label phase 2 study, we enrolled adult patients with Philadelphia-chromosome-negative, primary refractory or relapsed (first relapse within 12 months of first remission, relapse within 12 months after allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation [HSCT], or no response to or relapse after first salvage therapy or beyond) leukaemia. Patients received blinatumomab (9 μg/day for the first 7 days and 28 μg/day thereafter) by continuous intravenous infusion over 4 weeks every 6 weeks (up to five cycles), per protocol. The primary endpoint was complete remission (CR) or CR with partial haematological recovery of peripheral blood counts (CRh) within the first two cycles. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01466179. Findings Between Jan 13, 2012, and Oct 10, 2013, 189 patients were enrolled and treated with blinatumomab. After two cycles, 81 (43%, 95% CI 36–50) patients had achieved a CR or CRh: 63 (33%) patients had a CR and 18 (10%) patients had a CRh. 32 (40%) of patients who achieved CR/CRh underwent subsequent allogeneic HSCT. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were febrile neutropenia (48 patients, 25%), neutropenia (30 patients, 16%), and anaemia (27 patients, 14%). Three (2%) patients had grade 3 cytokine release syndrome. Neurologic events of worst grade 3 or 4 occurred in 20 (11%) and four (2%) patients, respectively. Three deaths (due to sepsis, Escherichia coli sepsis, and Candida infection) were thought to be treatment-related by the investigators. Interpretation Single-agent blinatumomab showed antileukaemia activity in adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia characterised by negative prognostic factors. Further assessment of blinatumomab treatment earlier in the course of the disease and in combination with other treatment approaches is warranted. Funding Amgen.

Approximately 30-50% of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in hematologic complete remission following multiagent therapy exhibit minimal residual disease (MRD) by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction or flow cytometry. MRD is the strongest predictor of relapse in ALL. In this open-label, single-arm study, adults with B-cell precursor ALL in hematologic complete remission with MRD (≥10-3) received blinatumomab 15 µg/m2/day by continuous intravenous infusion for up to four cycles. Patients could undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation any time after cycle 1. The primary endpoint was complete MRD response status after one cycle of blinatumomab. One hundred sixteen patients received blinatumomab. Eighty-eight of 113 evaluable patients (78%) achieved a complete MRD response. In the subgroup of 110 patients with Philadelphia-chromosome negative ALL in hematologic remission, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of relapse-free survival (RFS) at 18 months was 53%. Median overall survival was 36.5 months. In a landmark analysis, complete MRD responders had longer relapse-free survival (23.6 vs 5.7 months; P=0.002) and overall survival (OS) (38.9 vs 12.5 months; P=0.002) compared with MRD nonresponders. Adverse events were consistent with previous studies of blinatumomab. Twelve (10%) patients and three (3%) patients had grade 3 or 4 neurologic events, respectively. Four (3%) patients had cytokine release syndrome (two grade 1 and two grade 3), all during cycle 1. Following treatment with blinatumomab in a population of patients with MRD-positive B-cell precursor ALL, the majority achieved a complete MRD response, which was associated with significantly longer RFS and OS compared with MRD nonresponders. The study is registered to https://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01207388.

Purpose: Binding of colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) ligand to the CSF1 receptor (CSF1R) regulates survival of tumor-associated macrophages, which generally promote an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. AMG 820 is an investigational, fully human CSF1R antibody that inhibits binding of the ligands CSF1 and IL34 and subsequent ligand-mediated receptor activation. This first-in-human phase I study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of AMG 820. Experimental Design: Adult patients with relapsed or refractory advanced solid tumors received intravenous AMG 820 0.5 mg/kg once weekly or 1.5 to 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression, adverse event (AE), or consent withdrawal. Results: Twenty-five patients received ≥1 dose of AMG 820. AMG 820 was tolerated up to 20 mg/kg; the MTD was not reached. One dose-limiting toxicity was observed (20 mg/kg; nonreversible grade 3 deafness). Most patients (76%) had treatment-related AEs; the most common were periorbital edema (44%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST; 28%), fatigue (24%), nausea (16%), increased blood alkaline phosphatase (12%), and blurred vision (12%). No patients had serious or fatal treatment-related AEs; 28% had grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs. Grade 3 AST elevations resolved when treatment was withheld. AMG 820 showed linear pharmacokinetics, with minimal accumulation ( Conclusions: AMG 820 was tolerated with manageable toxicities up to 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Pharmacodynamic response was demonstrated, and limited antitumor activity was observed. Clin Cancer Res; 23(19); 5703–10. ©2017 AACR.

Multi-agent chemotherapy is the standard treatment for most B cell malignancies. Since chemotherapy can be associated with significant toxicity and since relapses resistant to chemotherapy often develop, new therapies are needed. Blinatumomab (AMG 103 or MT103) is a late-stage candidate in clinical development, which belongs to a novel class of antibody constructs termed bi-specific T cell engager antibodies. This antibody construct has dual specificity for CD19 and CD3 and can re-direct polyclonal cytotoxic T lymphocytes toward the tumor. This review focuses on the pre-clinical and clinical development of blinatumomab as a powerful new tool in the treatment of B cell malignancies.

For decades, chemotherapy has been the backbone for the treatment of patients with B cell malignancies. Depending on the individual disease, monoclonal antibodies, irradiation and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are added. However, the current standard of care--particularly for patients with relapsed disease--is often not sufficient to achieve durable remissions. A highly promising new drug candidate in late-stage clinical development for treatment of B cell malignancies is blinatumomab (MT103 or AMG 103). This bispecific antibody construct has dual specificity for CD19 and CD3 and belongs to the class of bispecific T cell engager (BiTE®) antibodies, which can potentially engage all cytotoxic T cells of a patient for redirected lysis of tumor cells. Here, we review how blinatumomab has so far been pre-clinically and clinically developed for the treatment of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Purpose Blinatumomab is a CD19/CD3 BiTE (bispecific T-cell engager) antibody construct for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome–negative acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia. We evaluated blinatumomab in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Patients and Methods This 3 + 3 design, phase I dose-escalation study determined adverse events and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of continuous intravenous infusion blinatumomab in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL. Blinatumomab was administered over 4 or 8 weeks at seven different dose levels (0.5 to 90 μg/m2/day). End points were incidence of adverse events, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and overall response rate. Results Between 2004 and 2011, 76 heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory NHL, who included 14 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, were enrolled; 42 received treatment in the formal dose-escalation phase. Neurologic events were dose limiting, and 60 μg/m2/day was established as the MTD. Thirty-four additional patients were recruited to evaluate antilymphoma activity and strategies for mitigating neurologic events at a prespecified MTD. Stepwise dosing (5 to 60 μg/m2/day) plus pentosan polysulfate SP54 (n = 3) resulted in no treatment discontinuations; single-step (n = 5) and double-step (n = 24) dosing entailed two and seven treatment discontinuations due to neurologic events, respectively. Grade 3 neurologic events occurred in 22% of patients (no grade 4/5). Among patients treated at 60 μg/m2/day (target dose; n = 35), the overall response rate was 69% across NHL subtypes and 55% for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 11); median response duration was 404 days (95% CI, 207 to 1,129 days). Conclusion In this phase I study of relapsed/refractory NHL, continuous infusion with CD19-targeted immunotherapy blinatumomab at various doses and schedules was feasible, with an MTD of 60 μg/m2/day. Single-agent blinatumomab showed antilymphoma activity.

T cell–engaging CD19/CD3-bispecific BiTE Ab blinatumomab has shown an 80% complete molecular response rate and prolonged leukemia-free survival in patients with minimal residual B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (MRD+ B-ALL). Here, we report that lymphocytes in all patients of a phase 2 study responded to continuous infusion of blinatumomab in a strikingly similar fashion. After start of infusion, B-cell counts dropped to < 1 B cell/μL within an average of 2 days and remained essentially undetectable for the entire treatment period. By contrast, T-cell counts in all patients declined to a nadir within < 1 day and recovered to baseline within a few days. T cells then expanded and on average more than doubled over baseline within 2-3 weeks under continued infusion of blinatumomab. A significant percentage of reappearing CD8+ and CD4+ T cells newly expressed activation marker CD69. Shortly after start of infusion, a transient release of cytokines dominated by IL-10, IL-6, and IFN-γ was observed, which no longer occurred on start of a second treatment cycle. The response of lymphocytes in leukemic patients to continuous infusion of blinatumomab helps to better understand the mode of action of this and other globally T cell–engaging Abs. The trial is registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00560794.

Regulatory (FOXP3+) T cells (Tregs) comprise a subpopulation of CD4+ T cells that suppress autoreactive immune cells, thereby protecting organs and tissues from autoimmunity. Tregs have also been detected in human malignancies and their depletion or inactivation substantially improves cellular antitumor immunity in preclinical studies. Novel therapeutic strategies for cervical cancer and precancerous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) focus on immune-modulatory and cancer vaccination approaches. In this context, the frequency of Tregs in cervical cancer and precancerous CIN could influence therapeutic strategies. We determined the frequency of infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as well as FOXP3+ Tregs in high-grade CIN lesions (CIN III) and cervical carcinoma compared to colon carcinoma, skin melanoma, and bronchial carcinoma. We show that human papilloma virus-derived lesions have a significantly higher number of infiltrating lymphocytes and FOXP3+ Tregs compared to three other common tumor entities. In addition we explored the therapeutic effect of agonistic anti-glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor family-related protein antibodies that, by single systemic application, inactivate Tregs and induce strong intratumoral invasion of CD8+ T cells and complete tumor eradication in 70% of treated animals. The large number of Tregs in human papilloma virus-derived lesions suggests a pivotal role of Tregs for counteracting the host immune response. We therefore regard CIN and cervical cancer as prime targets for new immune-based non-invasive therapies.

Hematologic malignancies are predominantly treated with chemotherapy or a combination of chemotherapy with monoclonal antibodies. Current treatment regimens often are not satisfactory due to severe side effects and a substantial proportion of relapsed patients. This has prompted the development of better tolerated and more efficacious immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of lymphoma and leukemia. With blinatumomab (MT103) a first antibody, which can potentially engage all cytotoxic T cells of a patient for tumor cell lysis, is now available for clinical evaluation. Blinatumomab is a single-chain bispecific antibody construct with specificity for CD19 and CD3 belonging to the class of bispecific T cell engager. Here, we review the current progress in development of blinatumomab for treatment of patients with CD19-expressing hematological malignancies.

Most cancer vaccination trials have been performed in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2 positive populations. Some studies have used HLA-A2 negative patients as control group. However, HLA-type and HLA-expression can interact with tumor biology and possibly affect prognosis. HLA-A2 negative patients might constitute an inadequate control group.Patients with colorectal cancer were serologically analyzed for HLA-A2 expression. Patients were evaluated for tumor stage, grading, tumor location. Overall survival (OAS) of HLA-A2 positive and HLA-A2 negative patients was compared.One hundred forty-four patients were evaluable (50% HLA-A2+). Median age was 62 years. UICC stage III or IV: 45.8%. Gender, location, and UICC stage were equally distributed between HLA-A2 subgroups. HLA-A2 positive patients more frequently had grade 3 histology (27.8% vs 13.9%) and chemotherapy (62.9% vs 45.6%). At a median follow-up of 75.8 months, median OAS for the entire study population was 123.3 months, 5-year OAS was 77.5%. No statistically significant difference in OAS was observed between HLA-A2 positive and negative patients (116.5 vs 157 months, 5-year-OAS 74.1+/-11.6% vs 81+/-11.6%, p=0.46). Expectedly, patients with UICC stage I and II disease lived significantly longer than patients with stage III and IV (5-year OAS 94.3% vs 53.4%; p0.001). A significantly superior OAS was also found for women, independent of stage or HLA status.HLA-A2 positive patients exhibit poorer tumor differentiation. This might account for a non-significant difference in OAS. The use of HLA-A2 negative patients as control cohort in CRC vaccinations would rather underestimate potential treatment-related survival effects. Therefore, we suggest they constitute a valid auxiliary control group.

Immunological treatment of cancer has made some very promising advances during the last years. Anti-cancer vaccination using peptides or peptide-pulsed dendritic cells and adoptive transfer of in vitro generated, epitope-specific T cells depend on a well-fitting interaction of HLA molecule and epitope. Accurate HLA-typing is a key factor for successful anti-cancer vaccination. No comprehensive data and no suggestion exist on the HLA-typing in this setting. We performed a systematic review of PubMed analyzing HLA-typing data in cancer vaccination trials over the last 4 years (2004-2007). Then, using the SYFPEITHI database, we calculated the peptide binding prediction of the eight most often used HLA-A*0201 binding epitopes. Finally, high-resolution typing [by sequence-specific primers (SSP)] data of a HLA-A*02 or HLA-A*24 positive population in Berlin, Germany, were analyzed. Forty-five cancer vaccination trials with 764 patients were included. Eighteen studies were performed in the USA, 13 in Europe, 12 in Asia (mainly Japan), and two in Australia. Most common diseases targeted were melanoma, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, renal cell cancer, and breast cancer. The trials tested protocols using peptide plus adjuvants without DC or protocols using peptide-pulsed DC. In 38 trials (84%) HLA-A2 positive patients were vaccinated, in 11 studies (24%) HLA-A24 positive patients were vaccinated. Nineteen studies with 291 patients (38%) presented the HLA type as four-digit code (high-resolution), 26 studies with 473 patients (62%) presented the HLA-type in a low-resolution code. The method of HLA determination was given in six out of 45 trials (13%). Using the SYFPEITHI database we calculated the peptide binding prediction of the eight most often used HLA-A*0201 binding tumor antigen-derived epitopes for binding to HLA-A*0203. While the epitopes had a binding score of 17-28 for HLA-A*0201, the score for binding to HLA-A*0203 was zero in seven out of eight tested peptides. Only for one peptide the score was eight. Finally, we analyzed high-resolution data of HLA-A*02 and HLA-A*24 positive patients in Berlin, Germany. We found the HLA-A*0201 allele and HLA-A*2402 allele in 95%, respectively. HLA-A*0201 and HLA-A*2402 are most commonly used for peptide based vaccine in cancer. Data on HLA-typing given in the included cancer vaccine manuscripts are fractional. Only 13% report the method of HLA typing and most HLA types are given as low-resolution code. Looking at the binding of specific peptides to both the alleles, it is important to perform high-resolution typing. Further suggestions for immunogenetic laboratories and clinical tumor immunologists regarding HLA-typing for cancer vaccine trials and adoptive T cell transfer approaches are discussed.

Few patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) achieve prolonged disease-free survival. Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engaging antibody construct, transiently links CD3-positive T cells to CD19-positive B cells. This phase 2 study evaluated stepwise (9-28-112 μg/d with weekly dose increases; n = 23) or flat (112 μg/d; n = 2) dosing of blinatumomab by continuous infusion, with dexamethasone prophylaxis, in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. Patients received a median of 3 prior lines of therapy. Median time since last regimen was 1.5 months. Seventeen patients ended treatment in cycle 1 (induction), 7 in cycle 2 (consolidation), and 1 in retreatment. Among 21 evaluable patients, the overall response rate after 1 blinatumomab cycle was 43%, including complete responses (CRs) in 19%. Three patients had late CR in follow-up without other treatment. The most common adverse events with stepwise dosing were tremor (48%), pyrexia (44%), fatigue (26%), and edema (26%). Grade 3 neurologic events with stepwise dosing were encephalopathy and aphasia (each 9%) and tremor, speech disorder, dizziness, somnolence, and disorientation (each 4%). Of 5 (22%) patients who discontinued stepwise dosing because of adverse events, 4 (17%) had neurologic events. Most neurologic events resolved. The flat-dose cohort was stopped because of grade 3 neurologic events in both patients. Blinatumomab monotherapy appears effective in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, a heavily pretreated patient population with a high unmet medical need. Further studies need to define the optimal approach to achieve the target dose without early dropout. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01741792.

Introduction. MRD in ALL is defined as detection of leukemic cells in bone marrow by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or flow cytometry with hematologic complete remission (CR). Pts with persistent/recurrent MRD after first-line induction therapy have a higher risk of relapse than those with complete MRD response (no detectable MRD with minimum sensitivity 0.01%). Interventions, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), are used to improve the outcome of these pts. Blinatumomab, a bispecific T cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct, redirects CD3+ T cells to CD19+ target cells, resulting in serial lysis of CD19+ B cells. In a multicenter, international phase 2 study in MRD+ ALL (Goekbuget N et al. Blood 2014;124:379), blinatumomab resulted in complete MRD response in cycle 1 in 78% of pts including multiple subgroups such as pts in second-line treatment, those with high MRD burden, and older pts. No subgroups with higher MRD complete response rates were identified. This analysis evaluated long-term outcomes, including overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and duration of remission (DOR). Methods. Adults (≥18 years) with B-cell precursor ALL with hematologic CR ( Results. 116 pts enrolled and received blinatumomab. Median age was 45 years (range 18-76); 15 (13%) pts were age ≥65 years. 90 (78%) pts received HSCT after blinatumomab. 62 (53%) pts were still being followed. 35 pts relapsed and 26 pts died in CR (23 of them after subsequent HSCT). Median OS, with median follow-up of 29.5 mo, was 36.5 mo (95% CI, 19.1 mo to not reached [n.r.]): 40.4 vs 12.0 (P =.001) in pts with (n=88) or without (n=24) MRD complete response in cycle 1. 110 pts were evaluable (CR at study entry, Ph-) for RFS and DOR. Median RFS was 18.9 mo (95% CI, 12.3 to 35.2 mo): 24.6 vs 11.0 (P =0.005) in pts treated in first (n=75) vs later (n=35) remission; and 35.2 vs 7.1 (P =0.002) in pts alive and relapse-free after 45 days with (n=85) or without (n=15) MRD complete response in cycle 1 (Figure). Median DOR was n.r. (95% CI, 24.6 mo to n.r.): n.r. vs 15.0 mo (P =0.002) in pts treated in first vs later remission; and n.r. vs 15.0 mo (P =0.015) in pts with DOR ≥ 45 days with (n=85) or without (n=13) MRD complete response in cycle 1. In time-dependent Cox model analyses, HSCT vs no HSCT were not different for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% CI, 0.68 to 2.82; P =0.368) or RFS (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.69; P =0.730); DOR (treating death as a competing risk) was longer for HSCT vs no HSCT (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.77; P =0.008). All pts experienced at least one AE. The most clinically relevant were neurologic events, including tremor (30%), aphasia (13%) dizziness (8%), ataxia and paraesthesia (6% each), and encephalopathy (5%). Rates decreased over time (cycles 1, 2, 3, and 4) for any neurologic event (47%, 24%, 15%, and 15%) and any grade ≥3 neurologic event (10%, 4%, 0%, and 0%). 12 (10%) pts interrupted treatment due to grade ≥3 neurologic events: 5 resumed without another interruption and 2 resumed then stopped treatment for another neurologic event. Investigators reported 4 deaths as fatal AEs during follow-up (brain injury, disease progression, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and multiorgan failure); all 4 pts received HSCT after blinatumomab. Conclusion. In this long-term follow-up analysis of the first large prospective trial with an experimental compound in MRD+ ALL, MRD complete response induced by single-agent blinatumomab treatment was associated with longer OS, RFS, and DOR compared with not achieving an MRD complete response after blinatumomab treatment. This strengthens the current strategy of MRD-based treatment in ALL before occurrence of clinical relapse. Disclosures Gökbuget: Sanofi: Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Erytech: Consultancy; Eusapharma/Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Medac: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Equity Ownership; SigmaTau: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Blinatumomab (BLINCYTO®) is approved for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-negative relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). It has not been approved for use in patients in hematologic remission, but with presence of minimal residual disease (MRD), from ALL.. Dombret:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Bonifacio:Amgen: Consultancy; Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis Farma: Research Funding. Reichle:University Hospital Regensburg: Employment. Graux:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Faul:Amgen: Honoraria. Topp:Astra: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support; Jazz: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support. Brüggemann:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Horst:Pfizer: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingleheim: Research Funding. Stieglmaier:Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment; Amgen Inc: Equity Ownership. Wessels:Amgen: Employment. Haddad:Amgen Ltd.: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Zugmaier:Amgen Res. Munich: Employment. Nagorsen:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: Inventor on blinatumomab-related patent. Bargou:University of Wuerzburg, Germany: Employment; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; GEMoaB GmbH: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: Patent for blinatumomab.

Colorectal cancer is a common malignant disease, which, despite some progress, still requires improved therapeutic options. Several clinical studies have used active specific immunotherapy (i.e., vaccination) in colorectal cancer. However, the literature still lacks a comprehensive meta-analysis of this approach in advanced colorectal cancer. We did a systematic review with a meta-analysis of clinical studies to evaluate the objective clinical and immunologic response to active specific immunotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. We conducted a search of Medline and the Web of Science, manually reviewed the literature, and consulted with experts. Criteria for including studies were colorectal cancer patients, active specific immunotherapy to induce a response directed against cancer or cancer antigens, an evaluable tumor burden (i.e., advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer), and precise classification of the patient, disease, and response. Response rates were assessed according to WHO criteria. Primary end points were the objective clinical response rate and the rate of immunologic responses. The secondary end point was the distribution of immune and clinical responses in relation to the route of vaccination and the type of vaccine. Thirty-two phase I/II studies reporting on 527 patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer met all inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed an overall response rate (complete response + partial response) of 0.9% for advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer patients who underwent active specific immunization with a broad variety of substances (e.g., autologous tumor cells, peptide vaccine, dendritic cells, idiotypic antibody, and virus-based vaccine). Humoral immune responses were reported in 59%, and cellular ones were reported in 44% of the cases. Mixed or minor responses and disease stabilization are described in 1.9% and 8.3% of colorectal cancer patients, respectively. Pooled results of clinical trials reveal a very weak clinical response rate of

Persistence or recurrence of minimal residual disease (MRD) after chemotherapy results in clinical relapse in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In a phase 2 trial of B-lineage ALL patients with persistent or relapsed MRD, a T cell–engaging bispecific Ab construct induced an 80% MRD response rate. In the present study, we show that after a median follow-up of 33 months, the hematologic relapse-free survival of the entire evaluable study cohort of 20 patients was 61% (Kaplan-Meier estimate). The hema-tologic relapse-free survival rate of a subgroup of 9 patients who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after blinatumomab treatment was 65% (Kaplan-Meier estimate). Of the subgroup of 6 Philadelphia chromosome–negative MRD responders with no further therapy after blinatumomab, 4 are in ongoing hematologic and molecular remission. We conclude that blinatumomab can induce long-lasting complete remission in B-lineage ALL patients with persistent or recurrent MRD. The original study and this follow-up study are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00198991 and NCT00198978, respectively.

The recent progress in tumor immunology is a striking example of the successful application of modern biotechnology to understand the complex phenomenon of immune-mediated cancer rejection. Tumor antigens were identified and successfully utilized in active immunization trials to induce tumor antigen-specific T cells. This achievement has left, however, clinicians and researchers perplexed by the paradoxical observation that immunization-induced T cells can recognize tumor cells in standard assays but cannot induce tumor regression. A closer look at T cell physiology and tumor biology suggests that this observation is not so surprising. Here, we argue that successful immunization is one of several steps required for tumor clearance while more needs to be understood about how T cells localize and are effective within a tumor microenvironment impervious to the execution of their effector function.

There is increasing evidence that tumors elicit specific T-cell responses in a substantial proportion of patients. Recently, we have shown that in patients with colorectal cancer specific T cells against the tumor-associated antigens (TAA) Ep-CAM, her-2/neu or CEA can be detected in peripheral blood using IFNγ-ELISPOT assay. In our study, we have analyzed T-cell responses against HLA-A*0201-restricted epitopes of these TAA in peripheral blood of patients with breast cancer and colorectal cancer. Surprisingly, a complete absence of ex vivo T-cell responses against these TAA was found in 20 patients with breast cancer. In contrast, specific T cells were detectable in 12 of 49 patients with colorectal cancer against at least 1 of these TAA, confirming our previous results. T-cell responses against influenza-derived peptides were similar in both malignancies. The results of our study indicate a difference either of tumor immunogenicity or of the migratory pattern of tumor-specific T cells between breast cancer and colorectal cancer patients. The findings reported here have implications for the development of antigen-specific T-cell therapies. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Current treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients often results in life-threatening immunosuppression. Furthermore, CLL is still an incurable disease due to the persistence of residual leukemic cells. These patients may therefore benefit from immunotherapy approaches aimed at immunoreconstitution and/or the elimination of residual disease following chemotherapy. For these purposes, we designed a simple GMP-compliant protocol for ex vivo expansion of normal T cells from CLL patients’ peripheral blood for adoptive therapy, using bispecific Ab blinatumomab (CD3 × CD19), acting both as T cell stimulator and CLL depletion agent, and human rIL-2. Starting from only 10 ml CLL peripheral blood, a mean 515 × 106 CD3+ T cells were expanded in 3 wk. The resulting blinatumomab-expanded T cells (BET) were polyclonal CD4+ and CD8+ and mostly effector and central memory cells. The Th1 subset was slightly prevalent over Th2, whereas Th17 and T regulatory cells were

Background: Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) may contribute to tumor growth and invasion and promote an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, making them an attractive target for cancer immunotherapy. TAMs can be activated by the binding of colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) to its receptor CSF-1R (c-fms). AMG 820 is an investigational, fully human antagonistic antibody to CSF-1R that inhibits ligand-induced receptor activation. In this open-label, sequential dose-escalation study, we evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and efficacy of AMG 820. Methods: Key eligibility criteria: age ? 18 years, advanced solid tumors relapsed or refractory to standard treatment, measurable disease per RECIST 1.1, ECOG performance status ? 2, and no primary central nervous system tumors/metastases. AMG 820 was administered by IV infusion once weekly at a starting dose of 0.5 mg/kg (cohort 1). Dosing frequency was later amended to once every 2 weeks (Q2W) with planned escalation to 1.5, 3, 6, 10, 20, and 30 mg/kg (cohorts 2–7), following a 3 + 3 design until a maximum tolerated dose (MTD, highest dose at which < 33% of pts/cohort had a dose-limiting toxicity [DLT]) or highest dose was reached. Results: A total of 25 pts received ? 1 dose of AMG 820: 3 pts at 0.5, 1.5, and 6 mg/kg; 4 pts at 3 and 10 mg/kg; 8 pts at 20 mg/kg. Median (range) age: 63 (48–80) years. Women: 56%. ECOG 0/1/2: 20%/76%/4%. MTD was not reached. One DLT was observed (20 mg/kg): nonreversible grade 3 hearing impairment in a female pt with anal cancer with confounding factors (prior treatment [tx] with cisplatin). Most pts (76%) had tx-related adverse events (TRAEs). Most common TRAEs (in > 10% of pts overall) were periorbital edema (11, 44%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (7, 28%), fatigue (6, 24%), nausea (4, 16%), increased blood alkaline phosphatase (3, 12%), and blurred vision (3, 12%). Grade ? 3 TRAEs were observed in 28% of pts. There were no serious or fatal TRAEs. After the first dose of AMG 820 at 20 mg/kg, mean estimates of Cmax and AUClast (AUC from time 0 to time of last sample) were 619 μg/mL and 89,200 μg•hr/mL, respectively. Both AMG 820 AUClast and Cmax increased linearly with dose, with minimal accumulation (< 2-fold) after repeated dosing. AMG 820 dosing was associated with significantly reduced skin macrophage levels compared to predose levels. At all dose levels tested, AMG 820 resulted in increases in serum CSF-1 concentrations, which were maximal at doses greater than 6 mg/kg. Of the 21 pts evaluable by central read, 8 (38%) pts had a best overall response of stable disease, including 1 pt with a 20% reduction in tumor burden (0.5 mg/kg, non-small cell lung cancer). Of the 25 pts evaluable by local read, 1 (4%) pt had a partial response with a 40% reduction in tumor burden (10 mg/kg, paraganglioma with liver metastasis), and 6 (24%) pts had stable disease. Conclusions: AMG 820 was tolerated with manageable toxicities up to 20 mg/kg Q2W and showed linear PK, with PD response in CSF-1 serum levels and tx-related changes in skin macrophages. These results and an increasing understanding of the role of TAMs in tumor immunosuppression provide the rationale for combining AMG 820 with other immunotherapies. Citation Format: Kyriakos Papadopoulos, Larry Gluck, Lainie P. Martin, Anthony J. Olszanski, Gateree Ngarmchamnanrith, Erik Rasmussen, Benny Amore, Dirk Nagorsen, John S. Hill, Joe Stephenson. First-in-human study of AMG 820, a monoclonal anti-CSF-1R (c-fms) antibody, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr CT137.

T-cell-based cancer immunotherapies are at the forefront of a new era in cancer treatment. Engaging T cells through BiTE® (bispecific T-cell engager) antibody constructs is one of the most advanced immunotherapeutic approaches. BiTE® antibody constructs have a unique design and mechanism of action. They are constructed by genetically linking the minimal binding domains of monoclonal antibodies for a tumor-associated surface antigen and for the T-cell receptor-associated molecule CD3 onto a single polypeptide chain. Concurrent engagement of the target cell antigen and CD3 leads to activation of polyclonal cytotoxic T-cells, resulting in target cell lysis. The first BiTE®, blinatumomab, targeting CD19 and CD3, is being investigated in a broad range of B-cell malignancies and has recently received an accelerated approval by the US FDA for Philadelphia chromosome-negative relapsed/refractory B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia under the trade name BLINCYTO®. In addition, several BiTE® antibody constructs targeting other tumor antigens have entered the clinical stage of development. Most recent updates about the BiTE® platform will be presented. Citation Format: Dirk Nagorsen. Engaging T cells against cancer: BLINCYTO® and beyond – the BiTE® platform. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR Inaugural International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; September 16-19, 2015; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2016;4(1 Suppl):Abstract nr IA14.

Background: T-cell activity is regulated by immune checkpoints to maintain the sensitive balance of co-stimulatory and inhibitory immune signals. Therapeutic blockade of checkpoint molecules on tumor or T cells such as CTLA-4 or PD-L1 has shown clinical success in several tumor types including Hodgkin´s disease. Furthermore, Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE antibody construct) directing cytotoxic T cells to CD19 positive leukemic cells has been approved for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The CD33 specific BiTE antibody construct AMG 330 has been developed for the therapy of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and will be evaluated in phase I studies shortly. In our current study, we investigated the therapeutic utility of blockade of the novel checkpoint proteins PVR (poliovirus receptor) and PVRL2 (poliovirus receptor-related 2) alone and in combination with AMG 330 in AML. Methods and results: Samples from 140 treatment naive patients with newly diagnosed AML (AMLSG 07-04, NCT00151242) were analyzed by RT-qPCR for expression of the immune checkpoint molecules PVR, PVRL2 and Galectin-9 (Gal-9). Expression was correlated with patient demographics (age, karyotype, FLT3 mutation status) and clinical survival data by multivariate cox regression. The majority of patients showed mRNA expression of PVR (94%), PVRL2 (95%) and Gal-9 (92%). In a multivariate stepwise cox regression for overall survival, an unfavorable karyotype, high PVR and high Gal-9 expression were identified as independent prognostic markers (p In a second, independent patient cohort containing microarray-based gene expression and clinical data of 291 AML patients (Verhaak et.al., Haematologica 2009;94) a high PVR and PVRL2 expression in contrast to expression of CD80, CD86 or PD-L1 was associated with poor overall survival (log-rank test p=0.003 and p=0.032, respectively). In in vitro killing assays the therapeutic effect of PVR and PVRL2 blockade was studied by FACS using 7-AAD staining. AML cell lines MV4-11, Kasumi-1 and Molm-13 were preincubated with blocking antibodies against PVR, PVRL2 or both and co-cultured for 24h with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of healthy donors in the presence or absence of AMG 330. In the absence of AMG 330, the cell kill of MV4-11 increased from 12.6±4.7% (control) to 33.0±8.8% (PVR), to 40.4±10.4% (PVRL2) and to 56.0±12.0% (both PVR + PVRL2). In the presence of suboptimal concentration of AMG 330 (0.1 ng/ml) MV4-11 cell lysis was 29.4±9.0% (AMG 330 alone), 49.7±12.6% (AMG 330 + PVR), 57.9±11.3% (AMG 330 + PVRL2) and 70.0±9.8% (AMG 330 + PVR + PVRL2; n=4, p Conclusion: The expression of immune checkpoint ligands PVR and PVRL2 confers a negative prognosis to AML patients possibly due to immune evasion. We could further show that the killing of AML cells by PBMCs could be augmented by blockade of these novel checkpoint inhibitors. Furthermore, addition of PVR and/or PVRL2 blocking antibodies to AMG 330 could enhance cytotoxicity. Therefore, blockade of PVR and PVRL2 represents a promising target for the treatment of AML. Disclosures Kischel: Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment. Stienen:Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment. Friedrich:Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment. Lutteropp:Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment. Nagorsen:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: Inventor on blinatumomab-related patent.

Purpose Blinatumomab, a bispecific single-chain antibody targeting the CD19 antigen, is a member of a novel class of antibodies that redirect T cells for selective lysis of tumor cells. In acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), persistence or relapse of minimal residual disease (MRD) after chemotherapy indicates resistance to chemotherapy and results in hematologic relapse. A phase II clinical study was conducted to determine the efficacy of blinatumomab in MRD-positive B-lineage ALL. Patients and Methods Patients with MRD persistence or relapse after induction and consolidation therapy were included. MRD was assessed by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for either rearrangements of immunoglobulin or T-cell receptor genes, or specific genetic aberrations. Blinatumomab was administered as a 4-week continuous intravenous infusion at a dose of 15 μg/m2/24 hours. Results Twenty-one patients were treated, of whom 16 patients became MRD negative. One patient was not evaluable due to a grade 3 adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation. Among the 16 responders, 12 patients had been molecularly refractory to previous chemotherapy. Probability for relapse-free survival is 78% at a median follow-up of 405 days. The most frequent grade 3 and 4 adverse event was lymphopenia, which was completely reversible like most other adverse events. Conclusion Blinatumomab is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment in patients with MRD-positive B-lineage ALL after intensive chemotherapy. T cells engaged by blinatumomab seem capable of eradicating chemotherapy-resistant tumor cells that otherwise cause clinical relapse.

Diastolic heart failure is a rising problem with a high incidence and similar mortality and morbidity compared to patients with systolic heart failure. Nevertheless, the underlying pathophysiology is still debated.We investigated the effect of pharmacological enhancement of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) on experimental diastolic heart failure (DHF).DHF was induced in 60 DAHL salt-sensitive rats by salt diet in 8-week-old animals. 30 were treated with the eNOS enhancer AVE3085 (DHFeNOS) and 30 with placebo (DHF). Rats with normal salt intake served as controls.Diastolic dysfunction with increased diastolic stiffness constant and increased left ventricular (LV) pressure was analyzed by invasive pressure-volume loop measurements in the DHF group compared to controls. Cardiac hypertrophy as indicated by LV mass measurements by echocardiography, and increased cardiac collagen content as measured by immunohistochemistry were associated with an increased activation state of calcineurin, AKT, ERK(1/2), but not JNK and p38 kinases. Titin isoforms were not altered in this model of DHF. Treatment with AVE3085 significantly increased eNOS mRNA and protein levels in the cardiac tissue and decreases NAD(P)H oxidase subunits p22phox and gp91phox. Diastolic dysfunction was attenuated and cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis were improved in comparison with untreated DHF animals. This was associated with a normalized activation state of calcineurin, AKT and ERK(1/2). Therefore, we suggest that targeting the NO system might yield a future therapeutic aim for the treatment of DHF.

7057 Background: Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody construct, showed efficacy in r/r ALL in a large phase 2 study (Topp et al. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:57). We evaluated associa...

Metastatic uveal melanoma has a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Proteoglycans are involved in tumor cell invasion and metastatic behavior. The mAbB5 stains a chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan (CSPG) on cutaneous melanoma cells. Here, we compare the B5-staining of CSPG in primaries and metastases of uveal melanoma.Immunohistopathological staining was performed in 15 cutaneous and 39 uveal melanoma samples. A score for intracellular and surface staining was established. B5 staining was compared in primaries and metastases of uveal melanoma using Student's t-test.Eight of 11 (73%) uveal melanoma metastases were positive for B5-staining whereas only 5 of 28 (18%) primary uveal melanoma samples were B5-positive (P0.001). Nine of 15 cutaneous melanoma samples (60%) were B5-positive without significant difference between primary and metastatic lesions. Surface staining was found both on uveal melanoma metastases and cutaneous melanomas.CSPG was expressed significantly more often in metastases than in primaries of uveal melanoma. It potentially may be one factor associated with metastatic spread. Further studies are needed to determine its use as prognostic factor. The mAbB5 may also be a promising tool for immunotherapy due to its strong staining of CSPG on the surface of cutaneous and metastatic uveal melanoma cells.

Introduction: Improvements in the therapeutic options available for adult relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-precursor ALL are required. Blinatumomab is an investigational bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct that redirects cytotoxic T cells to lyse CD19-positive B cells. Based on encouraging clinical data from a small phase 2 study (Topp MS et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(15s): abstract 7005), we conducted a large confirmatory open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase 2 study of blinatumomab in patients with r/r B-precursor ALL. The aim of the present analysis from this phase 2 study was to characterize those patients who proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after achieving complete remission (CR)/complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CRh*) with blinatumomab treatment. Methods: Eligible patients (≥18 years) had Philadelphia chromosome-negative r/r B-precursor ALL with one of the following negative prognostic factors: primary refractory, 1st relapse within 12 months of 1st remission, relapse within 12 months of HSCT, or ≥2nd salvage. Blinatumomab was given by continuous IV infusion (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) for up to 5 cycles. The primary endpoint was CR/CRh* within the first 2 cycles. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), HSCT realization rate, 100-day mortality following HSCT, and adverse events. Results: 189 patients with a median age (range) of 39 (18‒79) years were enrolled and received blinatumomab for a median (range) of 2 (1‒5) cycles. At enrollment, 74 (39%) patients had received ≥2 prior salvage therapies, 64 (34%) had received prior HSCT, and 105 (56%) had ≥75% bone marrow blasts. 43% (81/189) of patients achieved CR/CRh* within 2 cycles, with similar rates of remission observed in both the HSCT-naïve (42%; 52/125) and prior HSCT (45%; 29/64) groups. In total, 32/81 responders (CR, n=28 and CRh*, n=4) underwent HSCT during blinatumomab-induced remission, yielding a transplantation realization rate for blinatumomab responders of 40% (Table 1). 52% (27/52) of the HSCT-naïve patients and 17% (5/29) of patients who had received prior HSCT proceeded to on-study HSCT during blinatumomab-induced remission. These 32 transplants occurred after a median of 2 (1-5) cycles of therapy, with 11 (34%) patients receiving myeloablative conditioning pre-HSCT, 12 (38%) reduced intensity conditioning, and 9 (28%) unknown regimens. Twenty-two (69%) patients used unrelated donors (stem cells derived from blood, n=11; bone marrow, n=6; cord blood, n=5), 7 (22%) used related donors including 6 siblings (blood, n=5; bone marrow, n=1) and 1 haploidentical mother (blood), with 3 (9%) donor types and stem cell sources unknown. Six patients achieving CR/CRh* after 2 cycles of blinatumomab underwent HSCT but were not included in the transplantation realization rate of 40% due to receiving subsequent antineoplastic therapy before HSCT conditioning (Table 1). Among the 43 patients who achieved CR/CRh* within 2 cycles of blinatumomab treatment but never reached HSCT, 20 (47%) had undergone prior HSCT, 7 (16%) were ≥65 years, and 2 (5%) were ≥65 years and had received prior HSCT (Table 1). Figure 1 Figure 1. At the time of the primary analysis (data cut-off in October 2013), with median follow-up of 9.8 months, median (95% CI) OS for the 189 blinatumomab-treated patients was 6.1 (4.2‒7.5) months. When censoring for HSCT, median OS was 5.1 (4.1‒7.1) months; although the medians are slightly different, the curves with and without HSCT censoring largely overlap. Median RFS was 5.9 months with and without censoring for HSCT. Nine patients died at any time after HSCT, with 5 deaths due to infection, 3 due to disease progression, and 1 due to graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Three of these deaths (2 infections and 1 GvHD) were within 100 days of HSCT. The 100-day post-HSCT mortality rate was 11%. Summary: This large phase 2 study demonstrated antileukemia activity of single-agent blinatumomab in heavily pretreated or aggressive r/r ALL, irrespective of prior HSCT. The data suggest that blinatumomab enables patients to reach HSCT, with 11% 100-day mortality post-HSCT. Two-thirds of patients who did not reach HSCT after responding to blinatumomab were either ≥65 years old or had received prior HSCT. Longer follow-up is required to assess the role of HSCT in patients achieving CR/CRh* after treatment with blinatumomab. Disclosures Stein: Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: This presentation will discuss the off-label use of blinatumomab, as this agent is not approved for use by the FDA, EMA or any other regulatory authorities.. Topp:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Goekbuget:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Bargou:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dombret:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Larson:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rambaldi:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy. Zugmaier:Amgen Reseach (Munich) GmbH: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Jia:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Maniar:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huber:Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Nagorsen:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Related to blinatumomab Patents & Royalties. Kantarjian:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Background: Blinatumomab is an investigational bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct designed to direct cytotoxic T cells to CD19-expressing B cells. In a study in minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive ALL, 80% of pts achieved MRD-negative status after receiving one treatment cycle of blinatumomab (Topp MS, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2493-8). For pts with newly diagnosed ALL, persistence of MRD after first-line treatment predicts disease recurrence. However, only limited data are available about the relationship between MRD and outcome in adult pts with r/r ALL. Therefore, the aim of this secondary analysis was to evaluate MRD responses and their relationships to other efficacy indices in adult pts with r/r ALL receiving blinatumomab in this phase 2 study. Methods: Eligibility criteria included adult pts ≥18 years, with Philadelphia chromosome negative B-cell r/r ALL who were primary refractory or refractory to first salvage, had their first relapse within 12 months of first remission or allogeneic hematologic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), or received second or later salvage. Blinatumomab was dosed via continuous IV infusion at 28 μg/d (cycle 1 only: 9 μg/d on days 1-7, 28 μg/d on days 8-28) for up to five cycles (one cycle: 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off). The primary endpoint was complete remission (CR: ≤5% blasts with platelets >100,000/µL, absolute neutrophil count >1000/µL) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh*: platelets >50,000/µL, absolute neutrophil count >500/µL) within the first two treatment cycles. MRD in bone marrow was assessed at a central laboratory using allele-specific real-time quantitative PCR. Two MRD-based exploratory endpoints were analyzed: MRD response (no PCR amplification at a minimum sensitivity of 10-4 or Results: Of 189 treated pts (median [range] age = 39 [18–79] years), 81 (43%) pts had a CR (n = 63, 33%) or a CRh* (n = 18, 10%) during the first two treatment cycles. In the subgroup of pts with a CR/CRh* and evaluable MRD data (n = 73), 60 (82%) pts had an MRD response. Of those, 51 (70%) pts had a complete MRD response. The majority of those who achieved a CR/CRh* also achieved a complete MRD response regardless of the number of prior lines of salvage therapy (Table 1). Of all treated pts, 64 (34%) pts had prior HSCT. In pts who achieved CR/CRh*, the rate of MRD response was 81% in pts without and 85% in pts with prior HSCT. In pts who achieved CR/CRh*, the median (95% CI) duration of overall survival was 11.4 (8.5, not estimable) months for those with a MRD response and 6.7 (2.0, not estimable) months for those with no MRD response. The median (95% CI) duration of relapse-free survival was 6.9 (5.5, 10.1) months in patients with a MRD response and 2.3 (1.2, not estimable) months in patients with no MRD response. The HSCT realization rate did not differ significantly between pts with CR/CRh* and a MRD response and those with CR/CRh* and no MRD response (31% and 43%, respectively). Seventeen pts classified as nonresponders per protocol had ≤5% blasts and no evidence of disease, but recovery of peripheral counts did not meet criteria for CRh*. Ten of these 17 pts had evaluable MRD assessments; 50% (5/10) had MRD response and 20% (2/10) had complete MRD response. The clinical significance of this finding remains open. Grade ≥3 adverse events regardless of causality and occurring in >10% of all treated pts during treatment until 30 days after treatment were febrile neutropenia (25%), neutropenia (16%), and anemia (14%). Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was reported in three (1.6%) patients. Three (1.6%) patients had grade 4 neurologic events, all resolved. Twenty-one (11%) patients had grade 3 neurologic events, 17 were resolved, with 4 events unresolved at death or unknown. Conclusion: In this largest study to date of adult pts with r/r ALL with PCR-based central assessment of MRD, pts who achieved CR/CRh* during single-agent treatment with blinatumomab had high MRD response rates. The exploratory analyses suggested that within pts with a CR/CRh*, those who did not achieve MRD responses tended to have shorter durations of overall and relapse-free survival. These results are consistent with prior reports highlighting the importance of achieving an MRD response in first-line therapy. Disclosures Goekbuget: Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: This presentation will discuss the off-label use of blinatumomab, as this agent is not approved for use by the FDA, EMA or any other regulatory authorities. Kantarjian:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Brüggemann:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stein:Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bargou:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dombret:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Heffner:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Research Funding; Dana Farber CI: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Idera: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Talon Therapeutics: Research Funding. Rigal-Huguet:Amgen, Inc.: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Litzow:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Zugmaier:Amgen Reseach (Munich) GmbH: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Jia:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Maniar:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huber:Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Nagorsen:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Related to blinatumomab Patents & Royalties. Topp:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Introduction: Treatment of relapsed or refractory DLBCL can be challenging and little progress has been made in recent years. Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct, engages CD3+ cytotoxic T cells, resulting in T-cell expansion and lysis of CD19+ B cells. In a prior phase 1 study, blinatumomab treatment resulted in an overall response rate (ORR) of 55% in a subset of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In the present phase 2 study, we compared stepwise versus flat dosing of blinatumomab, and evaluated its efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) DLBCL. Methods: Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2 and had DLBCL; patients were refractory to treatment, had relapsed following autologous HSCT, or had relapsed and were ineligible for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Blinatumomab was administered over 8 weeks by continuous intravenous infusion. In stage 1, stepwise dosing (cohort I: 9, 28, and 112 μg/day after weeks 1, 2, respectively) was compared to constant dosing of 112 μg/day (cohort II). Based on the benefit/risk assessment from stage 1, stepwise dosing (9, 28, and 112 μg/day) was chosen for cohort III in stage 2. Patients achieving response after 8 weeks of treatment could receive a 4-week consolidation cycle after a 4-week treatment-free period. All patients received prophylactic dexamethasone (2 × 20 mg before infusion start and at infusion start; 3 × 8 mg/day for the first 2 days after infusion start and at dose step). The primary endpoint was ORR by Cheson revised response criteria for malignant lymphomas. Response was evaluated by independent radiologic assessment. Results: As of the primary analysis, 25 patients have been enrolled and treated: 9, 2, and 14 in cohorts I, II, and III, respectively. Fifty-six percent of patients were men, and the median age was 66 years (range, 34–85). Seven (28%) patients had received prior autologous HSCT. Blinatumomab was received as a fourth-line systemic therapy following a median (range) of 3 (1-7) prior treatments. Median (interquartile range) duration of exposure for stepwise dosing (cohorts I and III) was 46.8 (22.1−76.9) days. Twenty-one patients were evaluable for response (cohort I, n=7; cohort II, n=1; cohort III, n=13). Four patients were not evaluable for ORR per protocol definition due to early treatment discontinuation (1 patient were disorientation, encephalopathy, aphasia, and epilepsy [n=2 each]). There were no grade 4 or 5 neurologic events. Conclusions: In this phase 2 study, a stepwise dosing regimen (9, 28, and 112 μg/day) was established as the preferred dosing for blinatumomab in DLBCL. Treatment with blinatumomab showed an acceptable safety profile and resulted in objective and durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with r/r DLBCL. Disclosures Viardot: Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel support Other; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel support, Travel support Other; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Travel support Other. Off Label Use: This presentation will discuss the off-label use of blinatumomab, as this agent is not approved for use by the FDA, EMA or any other regulatory authorities.. Libicher:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy. Degenhard:Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership; Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment. Stieglmaier:Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership; Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment. Zhang:Amgen Inc.: Employment. Nagorsen:Amgen Inc.: Blinatumomab-related Patents & Royalties, Employment, Equity Ownership. Bargou:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Introduction: In ALL, minimal residual disease (MRD) is defined as the detection of leukemic cells in bone marrow by PCR or flow cytometry in the presence of hematological complete remission (CR). Patients with persistent/recurrent MRD after induction therapy have a higher risk of relapse than those with no detectable MRD. Effective treatment of patients with MRD aims to avoid hematologic relapse, reduce MRD load, and provide a bridge to subsequent HSCT. Blinatumomab, an investigational BiTE® antibody construct, redirects CD3+ T cells to CD19+ target cells, resulting in serial lysis of CD19+ B cells. In a phase 2 study of blinatumomab in 21 patients with MRD+ ALL in first-line treatment, 80% of evaluable patients achieved a complete MRD response. BLAST, a confirmatory single-arm, phase 2 study evaluated efficacy, safety, and tolerability of blinatumomab in patients with MRD+ ALL in a larger population. Methods: Adults (≥18 years) with B-precursor ALL in hematologic CR ( Results: 116 patients enrolled and received blinatumomab. Median (range) age was 45 (18–76) years; 15 (13%) patients were ≥65 years of age. 35% of the patients were treated in second or later remission (Table). As of February 2014, 106 patients had ended treatment: 74 had completed treatment (4 cycles or 1 cycle followed by HSCT) and 32 had discontinued treatment due to AEs, disease relapse, or investigators' decision; 79 patients were still alive and being followed. Three patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis: one had no central lab assay and two had assays with a sensitivity of 5×10-4. Eighty-eight patients (78% [95% CI, 69%–85%]) had a complete MRD response after 1 cycle of treatment. The lower CI bound exceeded 44% (the null hypothesis response rate), confirming that the study met its primary objective. Two additional patients had a complete MRD response after >1 cycle of blinatumomab; across all cycles the complete MRD response rate was 80%. The rate of complete MRD response did not differ significantly across baseline age, sex, line of treatment, and MRD burden categories (Table). All patients experienced ≥1 AE. AEs occurring in ≥20% of patients included pyrexia (88%), headache (38%), tremor (29%), chills (25%), fatigue (24%), nausea (22%) and vomiting (22%). Serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 60% of patients; 59% and 27% of patients had grade ≥3 and grade ≥4 AEs, respectively. SAEs occurring in ≥5% of patients were pyrexia (15%), tremor (7%), aphasia (5%), encephalopathy (5%) and overdose (5%). Two fatal AEs occurred on treatment: subdural hemorrhage and atypical pneumonia (the latter was deemed treatment-related). Conclusion: This is the largest prospective trial with an experimental compound in MRD+ ALL.Blinatumomab treatment resulted in complete MRD response across multiple patient demographics including patients in second-line treatment and those with high MRD burden. With a complete MRD response rate of 78%, the study met its primary objective. Among patients with a complete MRD response, 98% had a response within the first treatment cycle. In patients with MRD+ ALL following intensive therapy, rapid MRD response induced by blinatumomab has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Goekbuget: Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: This presentation will discuss the off-label use of blinatumomab, as this agent is not approved for use by the FDA, EMA or any other regulatory authorities.. Dombret:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bonifacio:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy. Graux:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Buss:Amgen Inc.: Reimbursement for participation in clinical studies, Reimbursement for participation in clinical studies Other; BMS: Travel support, Travel support Other; Novartis: Travel support Other; Pfizer: Reimbursements for participation in clinical studies, Reimbursements for participation in clinical studies Other. Bruggemann:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stieglmaier:Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership; Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment. Wessels:Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership; Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment. Haddad:Amgen Ltd.: Employment. Zugmaier:Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Nagorsen:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Related to blinatumomab Patents & Royalties. Bargou:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Background Interferon (IFN)-α is considered a key modulator of immunopathological processes through a signature-specific activation of mononuclear phagocytes (MPs). This study utilized global transcript analysis to characterize the effects of the entire type I IFN family in comparison to a broad panel of other cytokines on MP previously exposed to Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation in vitro. Results Immature peripheral blood CD14+ MPs were stimulated with LPS and 1 hour later with 42 separate soluble factors including cytokines, chemokines, interleukins, growth factors and IFNs. Gene expression profiling of MPs was analyzed 4 and 9 hours after cytokine stimulation. Four hours after stimulation, the transcriptional analysis of MPs revealed two main classes of cytokines: one associated with the alternative and the other with the classical pathway of MP activation without a clear polarization of type I IFNs effects. In contrast, after 9 hours of stimulation most type I IFN isoforms induced a characteristic and unique transcriptional pattern separate from other cytokines. These "signature" IFNs included; IFN-β, IFN-α2b/α2, IFN-αI, IFN-α2, IFN-αC, IFN-αJ1, IFN-αH2, and INF-α4B and induced the over-expression of 44 genes, all of which had known functional relationships with IFN such as myxovirus resistance (Mx)-1, Mx-2, and interferon-induced hepatitis C-associated microtubular aggregation protein. A second group of type I IFNs segregated separately and in closer association with the type II IFN-γ. The phylogenetic relationship of amino acid sequences among type I IFNs did not explain their sub-classification, although differences at positions 94 through 109 and 175 through 189 were present between the signature and other IFNs. Conclusion Seven IFN-α isoforms and IFN-β participate in the late phase polarization of MPs conditioned by LPS. This information broadens the previous view of the central role played by IFN-α in autoimmunity and tumor rejection by including and/or excluding an array of related factors likely to be heterogeneously expressed by distinct sub-populations of individuals in sickness or in response to biological therapy.

This pilot study was carried out to gain a first insight into the effects of peptide vaccination in melanoma patients in the high-risk adjuvant disease setting. From the adjuvant peptide vaccination studies carried out in our institution since 1998, we identified all melanoma patients with a history of at least 3 completely resected metastases during the year preceding enrollment into the trial and describe the clinical and immunologic observations. Out of a total of 44 patients with resected cutaneous melanoma entered into adjuvant peptide vaccination trials, 9 patients were identified with more than 3 metastases in the year before vaccination. After initiation of vaccination, 2 patients remained relapse-free for 27 and 42+ months, 2 patients experienced single or several initial relapses and subsequent relapse-free intervals of 18 and 65+ months, whereas 5 patients progressed. In both patients with relapse after prolonged relapse-free intervals, the relapses were initially confined to the small intestine and could be resected. Induction or boosting of functional tyrosinase peptide-specific T cells was noted in 6 of 8 patients, including all 4 patients with prolonged relapse-free intervals. In conclusion, adjuvant peptide vaccination was associated with cessation of recurrences in 4 of 9 patients, of whom all 4 had an immunologic response to the vaccine.

Tumor immunology embraces an extensive array of biological phenomena that include interactions between neoplastic cells and the innate and adaptive immune response. Among immune cells, T cells have taken the center stage because they can be easily demonstrated to specifically recognize autologous cancer cells. However, their role is limited and other components of the immune response are likely necessary for the completion of cancer rejection. Metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are malignancies strongly predisposed to regress in response to the systemic administration of high-dose interleukin (IL)-2. Several clinical Studies in extensive cohorts of patients have shown that this treatment can induce complete or partial clinical regressions of metastatic disease in 15 to 20% of patients who receive this treatment. Although IL-2 has direct pluri-potent effects on cells with immune and inflammatory function, it remains unexplained which cell subset is implicated in mediating tumor regression. In a quest to characterize the mechanism of action of IL-2 during the course of immunotherapy, we have investigated the early changes in transcriptional profiles of circulating mononuclear cells and microenvironment of melanoma metastases following high dose IL-2 administration (720,000 IU/kg) by serial sampling of blood cells and tumors in the form of fine needle aspirate (FNA). Furthermore, studies are currently ongoing to characterize the proteomic profiling of RCC patients undergoing the same treatment using protein arrays (manuscript in preparation). The predominant activation of genes related to inflammation and activation of mononuclear phagocytes lead us to further characterize this cell subset in the context of stimulation with a panel of soluble factors potentially present in the circulation and tumor microenvironment.

Among human cancers, melanoma is characterized by an almost unique predisposition to regress in response to immune therapy. Recent clinical studies suggest that the frequency of this favorable event is enhanced by combining T-cell-directed active specific immunization with the systemic administration of interleukin (IL)-2. While waiting for additional clinical experience to confirm this observation, we embraced the working hypothesis that this combination provides superior response rates than either treatment alone. In particular, we have focused our interest on the paradoxical observation that active specific immunization consistently induces circulating CD8+ T cells capable of recognizing in ex vivo assays tumor cells, but cannot induce tumor regression alone. In these settings, it appears that combining the systemic administration of IL-2 is almost an absolute requirement for the induction of clinical responses. Here, we will expand on previous speculations on the postulated mechanism(s) of action of systemic IL-2 administration and, based on original data recently derived through high-throughput transcriptional and post-translational analysis, we will suggest an explanation for the eclectic effects of IL-2 administration in the context of active specific immunization.

Immunologic adjuvants are used to augment the immunogenicity of MHC class I-restricted peptide vaccines, but this effect has rarely been systematically evaluated in a clinical trial. We have investigated, in a phase I study, whether addition of the 2 adjuvants GM-CSF and KLH can enhance the T-cell response to MHC class I peptide vaccines. Forty-three high-risk melanoma patients who were clinically free of disease received 6 vaccinations with MHC class I-restricted tyrosinase peptides alone, with either GM-CSF or KLH or with a combination of both adjuvants. The primary end point was induction of tyrosinase-specific T cells, and serial T-cell monitoring was performed in unstimulated peripheral blood samples before and after the second, fourth and sixth vaccinations by ELISPOT assay. Tyrosinase-specific IFN-gamma-producing T cells were detected as early as 2 weeks after the second vaccination in 5 of 9 patients vaccinated with tyrosinase peptides in combination with GM-CSF and KLH but not in any patient vaccinated with tyrosinase peptides without adjuvants or in combination with either adjuvant alone. After 6 vaccinations, tyrosinase-specific T cells were found in patients immunized with peptides either without adjuvants (3 of 9 patients) or in combination with the single adjuvant GM-CSF (4 of 9 patients) but not with KLH (0 of 10 patients). Our results suggest that addition of either GM-CSF or KLH as a single adjuvant has little impact on the immunogenicity of tyrosinase peptides. The combined application of GM-CSF and KLH was associated with early induction of T-cell responses.

We report here on 2 patients who received adjuvant vaccination with an HLA-A2- or HLA-A24-restricted tyrosinase peptide, respectively, and GM-CSF for frequently relapsing stage IV melanoma. Following resection of metastases and irradiation of brain metastases in 1 patient, both patients were without evidence of disease when receiving the first vaccination. While the patients had had 9 and 12, respectively, mostly s.c., relapses during the 3 years before vaccination, they experienced freedom from relapse for more than 2 years after vaccination. We found a T-cell response to the vaccine peptide in both patients in the peripheral blood by ex vivo IFN-gamma ELISPOT assay. The T-cell population could be further characterized by 4-color flow cytometry in 1 patient, showing that the majority of the peptide-specific CD3(+)CD8(+)IFN-gamma(+) T cells were granzyme B-positive and CCR-7-negative, characterizing them as effector T cells with the ability to mediate cytotoxicity and migrate to inflamed tissues. In this patient also, augmentation of the T-cell response to autologous tumor cells by vaccination could be detected. A single-site postvaccination relapse occurred in both patients, showing downregulation of tyrosinase expression in 1 patient, while normal expression levels for tyrosinase, MHC class I antigens and components of the antigen-processing machinery were found in the other patient. These results suggest that peptide vaccination resulted in a prolonged relapse-free interval in these high-risk patients.

In previous studies CD8+ T cells specific for melanocyte antigens have been frequently found in melanoma patients responding to interleukin-2 (IL-2)-based therapies. In our study we analyzed the suitability of using circulating T cells from melanoma patients with clinical response after IL-2-based therapy to identify novel T-cell epitopes from defined tumor antigens. Using unstimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells and the interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) ELISPOT assay, we studied CD8(+) T-cell responses against 5 peptides from the tumor antigen tyrosinase (Tyr) selected by epitope prediction using an HLA-A1-binding computer algorithm. T cells specifically secreting IFN-gamma in response to 3 of these 5 peptides, namely, Tyr (454-463), Tyr (146-156) and Tyr (243-251), could be detected in 4 of 4 HLA-A1-positive patients with clinical response. In contrast, no T-cell responses against these peptides were seen in 6 HLA-A1-positive melanoma patients with progressive disease and in 8 healthy subjects. We could generate specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) against Tyr (454-463) using peptide-pulsed autologous dendritic cells as antigen-presenting cells. The induced CTLs efficiently killed melanoma cells that express HLA-A1 and tyrosinase. The peptides Tyr (146-156) and Tyr (243-251) had recently been identified as CTL epitopes by other groups. Further ex vivo characterization of the T cells reactive against the novel epitope Tyr (454-463) in 1 patient by multicolor flow cytometry showed specific CD3+/CD8+/IFN-gamma+ T cells with frequencies of up to 0.41% of the CD3+/CD8+ T-cell population. Most of this T-cell population also expressed granzyme B. Our data confirm that in patients with tumor regressions induced by immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy circulating T cells reactive with tyrosinase epitopes can frequently be detected. Peripheral blood T cells from such patients are a valuable source for screening peptides selected by epitope prediction This strategy facilitates the rapid identification of immunogenic T-cell epitopes that are probable targets of immune-mediated tumor rejection.

7005^ Background: Blinatumomab, an investigational bispecific T-cell engaging (BiTE) antibody that directs cytotoxic T-cells to CD19-expressing target cells, has shown antileukemia activity in an e...

Meeting abstracts BiTE® antibodies are novel recombinant single chain Ig domain constructs that leverage the endogenous cytotoxic potential of polyclonal T cells to target malignant cells by utilizing the specific binding properties of variable domains from two different antibodies. Antibody-based

To determine whether circulating tumor-reactive T cells are present in melanoma patients, unstimulated T cells from peripheral blood were tested for recognition of HLA-A2- or HLA-A1-matched melanoma cell lines using the ELISPOT assay. Eleven out of 19 patients with metastatic melanoma had a T-cell response with up to 0.81%, 0.78%, 0.53%, 0.12%, 0.10%, 0.09%, 0.07%, 0.06%, 0.06%, 0.04%, and 0.04% of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) secreting IFNγ upon exposure to various HLA-A2- or HLA-A1-matched melanoma cell lines. These T-cell responses were mediated by CD8+ T cells and could specifically be blocked by an anti-HLA-A2 antibody in HLA-A2-positive patients. Separation experiments performed in one melanoma patient showed tumor-reactive T cells in both the CD8+ effector T cell (CD45RA+/IFNγ+) as well as the CD8+ memory T-cell compartment (CD45RO+/IFNγ+). In 3 out of 5 patients, in whom autologous cell lines were available, similar frequencies of T cells in response to HLA-A1- or HLA-A2-matched allogeneic and autologous tumor cells were observed, while 2 patients had a T-cell response restricted to either the autologous or the allogeneic cell lines. These results give evidence for the presence of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells in more than half of melanoma patients tested. Although some of these patients have clinical evidence for an immunological-mediated tumor control, several patients have growing tumors suggesting presence of escape mechanisms. Int. J. Cancer 87:659–664, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Introduction Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) that redirects cytotoxic T cells to CD19+ B-lineage cells, has shown anticancer activity and acceptable toxicity in a phase 1 study in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Using a stepwise dose escalation treatment, the overall response rate (ORR) in patients with DLBCL was 55% (Goebeler et al. Hematol Oncol 2013;31[suppl 1]:197). This open-label phase 2 study has been initiated to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of blinatumomab in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, comparing stepwise dose escalation with constant target dosing. Methods In this ongoing study, eligible patients must be ≥18 years of age, must have relapsed/refractory DLBCL and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2. Blinatumomab is administered by continuous intravenous infusion over 8 weeks. In part 1 of the study, two cohorts were evaluated using a double-step or flat dose escalation regimen, respectively, in order to achieve the target dose of 112 μg/d. Part 2 will investigate the selected treatment schedule from part 1. Data from part 1 (cohorts I and II) are presented herein. Patients in cohort I received stepwise blinatumomab dosing of 9, 28, and 112 μg/d during weeks 1, 2, and thereafter, respectively; patients in cohort II received blinatumomab at 112 μg/d throughout. After a 4-week treatment-free period, patients achieving an objective response were permitted to receive a 4-week consolidation cycle. All patients received prophylactic dexamethasone. The primary endpoint is ORR by Cheson (2007) revised response criteria for malignant lymphomas. Results To date, 11 patients have been enrolled and treated in part 1 of the study: nine in cohort I and two in cohort II. The median age was 73 years (range, 55–85); 64% of patients were women. Six (55%) patients had received ≥3 lines of previous systemic antitumor therapy; study treatment was given as fourth-line (median) systemic treatment. Three patients had received autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. At the time of this analysis, seven patients were evaluable for response (cohort I, n=6; cohort II, n=1). The ORR based on independent radiological assessment was 57% (cohort I: complete response, n=1; partial response, n=2; cohort II: partial response, n=1). Three patients had progressive disease (all in cohort I). Four patients were not evaluable for ORR per protocol definition: early treatment discontinuation after Conclusions In this ongoing phase 2 study, blinatumomab was tolerable and showed antitumor activity in adult, heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. Part 1 of the study established a recommended blinatumomab dose for this patient population. The study continues to enroll patients in part 2 (cohort III). Disclosures: Libicher: Amgen Inc.: Consultancy. Degenhard:Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Stieglmaier:Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Zhang:Amgen Inc.: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Nagorsen:Amgen Inc.: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Bargou:University of Würzburg: Consultancy; University of Würzburg: Honoraria; Amgen Inc.: patent, patent Other.

3051 Background: Blinatumomab (AMG 103) is an investigational, bispecific, T cell engaging (BiTE) antibody targeting CD19-expressing B cells. We describe the exposure-pharmacodynamic (PD) response of blinatumomab in patients with NHL, using a quantitative pharmacology approach. Methods: In a phase 1 study, 76 patients with NHL received blinatumomab by continuous intravenous infusion (cIV) at doses of 0.5 to 90 μg/m2/d in 4- or 8-week cycles. Pharmacokinetics (PK) was determined. PD responses evaluated included lymphocytes and cytokines measured during treatment, and sum of the products of the greatest diameters of tumor size in lymph nodes (SPD) at the end of treatment. Blinatumomab concentration at steady state (Css) and the cumulative area under the concentration (AUCcum)–time curve over the period before the evaluation of SPD were used to evaluate the exposure-SPD relationship. Results: Blinatumomab showed linear PK. Early PD responses were characterized by B cell depletion, T cell redistribution, and transient cytokine release. Following cIV at doses from 0.5 to 90 μg/m2/d, B cells declined at a first-order rate with a dose-dependent rate constant, ranging from 0.16 to 1.0 h-1. Complete B cell depletion was achieved within 48 hours at doses ≥5 μg/m2/d. A dose-independent decrease in T cell counts was observed within 24 hours after dosing, and T cells returned to baseline within 2 weeks of treatment. Cytokine elevation occurred in some patients and was dose-dependent. Blinatumomab exposure-SPD relationship was best described by an inhibitory Emax model (E = E0-(Imax*C)/(IC50+C)). According to the model estimation, a 50% reduction in SPD would be achieved when Css is 2141 pg/mL and AUCcum is 1381 h*μg/L, equivalent to a blinatumomab dose of 54 µg/m2/d given over 27 days. Conclusions: B lymphocytes were completely depleted from the circulation at blinatumomab doses ≥5 μg/m2/d. Depletion was faster at higher doses. Higher blinatumomab Css and AUCcum were associated with better tumor reduction. Tissue accessibility may explain the higher dose requirement for SPD reduction versus peripheral B cell depletion. The PK/PD model has utility for the design of future studies of blinatumomab in NHL. Clinical trial information: NCT00274742.

Abstract 1637 Blinatumomab (MT103) is a single-chain bispecific antibody construct with specificity for CD19 and CD3 belonging to the class of bispecific T cell engager (BiTE®). A phase I trial with indolent and mantle cell lymphoma patients established a maximal tolerable dose (MTD) at 60 μg/m2/d. The trial was subsequently amended to evaluate blinatumomab in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients were treated by 4–8-week continuous i.v. administration with the following dosing regimen: first week at 5 μg/m2/d, second week at 15 μg/m2/d and for the remaining treatment period at 60 μg/m2/d. Two cohorts each with 6 DLBCL patients were enrolled. The two cohorts solely differed by the dose and schedule of corticosteroid medication administered at the beginning of blinatumomab infusion for mitigation of adverse events. In the first cohort 100 mg prednisolone was applied 1 hour prior to start; and in the second cohort patients received dexamethasone on days 1, 2, and 3. Three sequential patients received dexamethasone also 6–12 hours prior to start of infusion. Out of the twelve patients, 5 were male and 7 female. The median age was 57 years (range from 26 to 78 years). Patients had received a median of 4 prior regimens (range from 2–6). All patients had been exposed to rituximab. Eight of the 12 patients had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). International prognostic index (IPI) at screening ranged from 1 to 3 with a median of 2. The most common clinical adverse events (AEs) regardless of causality (>30%) were pyrexia (81.8%), fatigue (54.5%), constipation (36.4%), headache (36.4%), tremor (36.4%) and weight increase (36.4%). The most frequent laboratory AEs regardless of causality (>30%) were hyperglycemia (63.6%), lymphopenia (54.5%), C-reactive protein increase (45.5%), gamma-glutamyltransferase increase (45.5%) and thrombocytopenia (36.4%). Most AEs occurred early and were reversible. Four of 12 patients discontinued infusion due to fully reversible CNS events, 2 of which qualified as dose limiting toxicities (DLTs). Although just one DLT (reversible CNS event grade 3) occurred in the prednisolone cohort, a further cohort applying prophylactic dexamethasone was opened to optimize management of CNS events. A further refinement of the dexamethasone schedule, starting longer time prior to start of blinatumomab, was introduced after one early patient in the cohort receiving dexamethasone had experienced a reversible CNS event leading to discontinuation. All three patients treated in this manner completed the first blinatumomab cycle without discontinuations. Only one showed a grade 1 tremor, and no other CNS AEs were reported in these three patients. Two of 12 patients were not exposed to 60 μg/m2/d due to early discontinuations and 1 patient is too early in treatment for response evaluation. Five out of the remaining 9 evaluable patients (56%) showed objective clinical responses (4 CR/CRu; 1 PR). Three out of the 5 patients with CR/CRu or PR had prior ASCT. Two patients achieved objective responses (1 CR, 1 PR) despite of discontinuation at 60 μg/m2/d. The median response duration is +182 days (longest current duration +428 days), with 4 out of 5 responses still ongoing. Further evaluation of the last cohort will refine the recommended phase II dose, and the intensity and timing of dexamethasone comedication. The observation of lasting CRs after blinatumomab monotherapy in DLBCL patients is promising and warrants further exploration in a phase II study. Disclosures: Krause: Micromet: Research Funding. Mackensen:Micromet Inc.: Research Funding. Topp:Micromet: Consultancy, Honoraria. Scheele:Micromet Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Nagorsen:Micromet Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Zugmaier:Micromet: Employment. Degenhard:Micromet Inc: Employment. Schmidt:Micromet AG: Employment. Kufer:Micromet Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Libicher:Micromet Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bargou:Micromet: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Abstract 2880 Blinatumomab (MT103) is a single-chain bispecific antibody construct with specificity for CD19 and CD3 belonging to the class of bispecific T cell engager (BiTE®). We have previously reported that blinatumomab delivered as single agent to patients with relapsed NHL and B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia by continuous intravenous (CIV) infusion over 4–8 weeks depleted peripheral B cells, expanded T effector cells, and resulted in clinical responses. In this phase I study 52 patients (41 males, 11 females) have been treated, 21 with FL, 21 with MCL and 10 with other subtypes of lymphoma (MZL, SLL, LPL, CLL). Patients have received a median of 3 prior regimens (range 1 to 12). Ninety percent of the patients had prior exposure to rituximab and 45% to fludarabine. Patients were treated at a dose range from 0.5 to 90 μg/m2/d. The most common adverse events (AEs) occurred early, were transient, reversible and did not require discontinuation of treatment. The most common clinical AEs regardless of causality were pyrexia (75%), headache (45%) and fatigue (37%). The most common laboratory abnormality AEs regardless of causality were lymphopenia (75%), leukopenia (57%), thrombocytopenia (39%), C-reactive protein increase (53%) and fibrin D dimer increase (37%). The medically most important AEs that resulted in permanent discontinuation were CNS events. Signs and symptoms observed included kinetic tremor, speech impairment, disorientation, apraxia and seizure. All CNS events were fully reversible without sequelae and no pathological findings by MRI imaging were reported. Out of the 52 patients treated, 9 had to discontinue treatment permanently in the first cycle due to these CNS events. At a dose of 90 μg/m2/d two DLTs were observed which were CNS events during the DLT period of the first 2 weeks of treatment. Therefore 60μg/m2/d is the currently recommended dose. A low B to T cell ratio ( Overall 18 patients with FL or MCL were treated with constant or step dosing regimens at or reaching 60 μg/m2/d dose level. Eight out of the 9 patients with constant dosing showed an objective response by Cheson criteria. All responders had a high B:T cell ratio. One patient with a low B:T cell ratio was discontinued due to a CNS AE. Six out of 9 patients with low B:T cell ratio enrolled for step dosing showed an objective response. One patient (single step dosing) discontinued treatment because of a CNS AE and 2 patients discontinued because of tumor progression. As of June 15th 2010, response duration ranged from 1 to 30+ months. Median for response duration was 26 months with 5 out of 14 responses ongoing. Table 1: Response evaluation in patients enrolled in 60 μg/m2/d cohorts. Dose Level Cohort Patients Complete Response Partial Response Overall Response FL MCL Total FL MCL Total FL MCL Total FL MCL Total 60 μg/m2/d Constant 6 3 9 2 1 3 4 1 5 6 2 8 5 or 15 then 60 μg/m2/d Single step 3 3 6 2 0 2 1 1 2 3 1 4 5/15/60 μg/m2/d Double Step 2 1 3 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Total 11 7 18 4 1 5 7 2 9 11 3 14 These data confirm high single-agent activity of blinatumomab with long lasting remissions. Initial data with double step dosing demonstrate that this approach maintains clinical activity without discontinuations due to CNS AEs. Evaluation of safety and clinical efficacy of this uniform double step schedule including other subtypes of NHL is ongoing. Disclosure: Scheele: Micromet Inc.: Employment. Zugmaier:Micromet Inc.: Employment. Nagorsen:Micromet Inc.: Employment. Klinger:Micromet Inc.: Employment. Schmidt:Micromet Inc.: Employment. Klappers:Micromet. Inc: Employment. Kufer:Micromet Inc.: Employment. Bargou:Micromet Inc.: Consultancy.