1. Validation of Maternal Report of Receipt of Iron–Folic Acid Supplementation during Antenatal Care in Rural Southern Nepal
- Author
-
Steve C LeClerq, Joanne Katz, Melinda K. Munos, Tsering P. Lama, Subarna K. Khatry, and Emily Bryce
- Subjects
Iron ,Population ,Iron+folic acid ,Maternal recall ,coverage ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,AcademicSubjects/MED00060 ,Folic Acid ,Nepal ,antenatal care ,Pregnancy ,Humans ,Medicine ,Longitudinal cohort ,education ,validation ,Receipt ,education.field_of_study ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,business.industry ,Gold standard ,iron–folic acid ,Direct observation ,Prenatal Care ,medicine.disease ,Community and International Nutrition ,Dietary Supplements ,AcademicSubjects/SCI00960 ,Female ,measurement ,business ,Demography - Abstract
Background Coverage of iron folic-acid (IFA) supplementation is a key indicator for tracking programmatic progress within and across countries. However, the validity of maternal report of this information during household surveys has yet to be determined. Objective This study aimed to examine the validity of maternal recall of receipt of IFA supplementation during antenatal care and factors associated with accuracy of maternal recall. Methods A longitudinal cohort design was employed. The direct observation of the IFA received during all antenatal care visits at the five study health posts served as the "gold standard" to the maternal report of IFA received during the postpartum interview. Individual-level validity was assessed by calculating indicator sensitivity, specificity and area under the operating curve (AUC). The inflation factor (IF) measured population-level bias. A multivariable log-binomial model was used to assess factors associated with accurate recall. Results The majority (95.8%) of women were observed receiving IFA during pregnancy. Women overreported the number IFA tablets received compared to what was observed during ANC visits (mean difference = 45 tablets). Maternal report of any IFA receipt was moderate (AUC = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.71) and population bias was low (IF = 1.01). However, the individual-level validity was poor across the seven IFA tablet count categories; the AUC for categories ranged from misleading to moderate. Driven by the trend of maternal overreport, the inflation factor indicated that maternal report drastically underestimated the coverage of lower tablet categories and overestimated the coverage of higher tablet counts. Accuracy of maternal report was not associated with months since last ANC observation nor any maternal characteristics. Conclusions Maternal report of the amount of IFA supplementation received during pregnancy produced extremely biased population coverage and performed poorly to moderately for individual level validity. It is imperative to improve this indicator, as it is used in global frameworks and national program planning.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF