1. Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation
- Author
-
Andreas Zuckermann, Andreas A. Kammerlander, Christian Loewe, Dietrich Beitzke, Marie-Elisabeth Stelzmüller, Martin Krššák, and Constantin Gatterer
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Pacemaker, Artificial ,medicine.medical_specialty ,lcsh:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,Time Factors ,Image quality ,medicine.medical_treatment ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Risk Assessment ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Electrocardiography ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Risk Factors ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,In patient ,Prospective Studies ,cardiovascular diseases ,Adverse effect ,Prospective cohort study ,Contraindication ,Aged ,Angiology ,Heart transplantation ,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Research ,Cardiac Pacing, Artificial ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Middle Aged ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,MR safety ,Treatment Outcome ,lcsh:RC666-701 ,Cardiology ,cardiovascular system ,Heart Transplantation ,Cardiac transplantation ,Female ,Cardiovascular magnetic resonance ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Background Temporary epicardial pacing wires, implemented in patients during heart transplantation, are routinely removed before discharge. However, in some cases, these wires may remain in situ and are often considered as a contraindication for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in the future. Therefore, we aimed to provide data about safety and image quality of CMR in these patients. Methods This is a report on a subpopulation out of 88 patients after heart transplantation that were included in a prospective cohort study and underwent multiple CMR in their post-transplant course. During CMR, patients were monitored by electrocardiogram and all examinations were observed by a physician to document potential adverse events. Additionally, image quality was assessed by an imaging specialist. Results Nineteen of 88 patients included had temporary pacing wires in situ. These patients underwent a total of 51 CMR studies. No major adverse event and only one single, mild sensory event could be documented. All CMR studies showed preserved diagnostic image quality. Temporary pacing wires were visible in 100% of HASTE and cine sequences. In less than 50% of the examinations, temporary pacing wires were also visible in T1 and T2 mapping, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences, without any impairment of image quality. Conclusions With a low event rate of only one mild adverse event during 51 CMR examinations (2%), CMR appears to be safe in patients with retained temporary epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation. Moreover, image quality was not impaired by the presence of pacing wires.
- Published
- 2021