1. Agreement Between Invasive Wire-Based and Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment on Intermediate Coronary Stenoses
- Author
-
Chun-Chin Chang, Yin-Hao Lee, Ming-Ju Chuang, Chien-Hung Hsueh, Ya-Wen Lu, Yi-Lin Tsai, Ruey-Hsing Chou, Cheng-Hsueh Wu, Tse-Min Lu, Po-Hsun Huang, Shing-Jong Lin, and Robert-Jan van Geuns
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,resting full-cycle ratio ,Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16] ,Fractional flow reserve ,Cardiovascular Medicine ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Coronary artery disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center ,Internal medicine ,Medicine ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,In patient ,030212 general & internal medicine ,fractional flow reserve ,Original Research ,vessel fractional flow reserve ,Receiver operating characteristic ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,percutaneous coronary intervention ,Percutaneous coronary intervention ,medicine.disease ,Ostium ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,RC666-701 ,Angiography ,Cardiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,coronary artery disease ,Artery - Abstract
Background: Angiography-based functional assessment of coronary stenoses emerges as a novel approach to assess coronary physiology. We sought to investigate the agreement between invasive coronary wire-based fractional flow reserve (FFR), resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), and angiography-based vessel FFR (vFFR) for the functional assessment of coronary stenoses in patients with coronary artery disease.Materials and Methods: Between Jan 01, 2018, and Dec 31, 2020, 298 patients with 385 intermediate lesions received invasive coronary wire-based functional assessment (FFR, RFR or both) at a single tertiary medical center. Coronary lesions involving ostium or left main artery were excluded. vFFR analysis was performed retrospectively based on aortic root pressure and two angiographic projections.Results: In total, 236 patients with 291 lesions were eligible for vFFR analysis. FFR and RFR were performed in 258 and 162 lesions, respectively. The mean FFR, RFR and vFFR value were 0.84 ± 0.08, 0.90 ± 0.09, and 0.83 ± 0.10. vFFR was significantly correlated with FFR (r = 0.708, P < 0.001) and RFR (r = 0.673, P < 0.001). The diagnostic performance of vFFR vs. FFR was accuracy 81.8%, sensitivity 77.4%, specificity 83.9%, positive predictive value 69.9%, and negative predictive value 88.5%. The discriminative power of vFFR for FFR ≤ 0.80 or RFR ≤ 0.89 was excellent. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.87 (95% CI:0.83–0.92) for FFR and 0.80 (95% CI:0.73–0.88) for RFR.Conclusion: Angiography-based vFFR has a substantial agreement with invasive wire-based FFR and RFR in patients with intermediate coronary stenoses. vFFR can be utilized to assess coronary physiology without a pressure wire in a post hoc manner.
- Published
- 2021