Search

Abstract Importance The most common screening tool for depression is the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Despite extensive research on the clinical and behavioral implications of the PHQ-9, data are limited on the relationship between PHQ-9 scores and social determinants of health and disease. Objective To assess the relationship between the PHQ-9 at intake and other measurements intended to assess social determinants of health. Design, Setting, and Participants Cross-sectional analyses of 2502 participants from the Baseline Health Study (BHS), a prospective cohort of adults selected to represent major demographic groups in the US; participants underwent deep phenotyping on demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, laboratory, functional, and imaging findings. Interventions None. Main Outcomes and Measures Cross-sectional measures of clinical and socioeconomic status (SES). Results In addition to a host of clinical and biological factors, higher PHQ-9 scores were associated with female sex, younger participants, people of color, and Hispanic ethnicity. Multiple measures of low SES, including less education, being unmarried, not currently working, and lack of insurance, were also associated with higher PHQ-9 scores across the entire spectrum of PHQ-9 scores. A summative score of SES, which was the 6th most predictive factor, was associated with higher PHQ-9 score after adjusting for 150 clinical, lab testing, and symptomatic characteristics. Conclusions and Relevance Our findings underscore that depression should be considered a comorbidity when social determinants of health are addressed, and both elements should be considered when designing appropriate interventions.

Newer data platforms offer increased opportunity to share multidimensional health data with research participants, but the preferences of participants for which data to receive and how is evolving. Our objective is to describe the preferences and expectations of participants for the return of individual research results within Project Baseline Health Study (PBHS). The PBHS is an ongoing, multicenter, longitudinal cohort study with data from four initial enrollment sites. PBHS participants are recruited from the general population along with groups enriched for heart disease and cancer disease risk. Cross-sectional data on return of results were collected in 2017–2018 from an (1) in-person enrollment survey (n = 1,890), (2) benchmark online survey (n = 1,059), and (3) participant interviews (n = 21). The main outcomes included (1) preferences for type of information to be added next to returned results, (2) participant plans for sharing returned results with a non-study clinician, and (3) choice to opt-out of receiving genetic results. Results were compared by sociodemographic characteristics. Enrollment and benchmark survey respondents were 57.1% and 53.5% female, and 60.0% and 66.2% white, respectively. Participants preferred the following data types be added to returned results in the future: genetics (29.9%), heart imaging, (16.4%), study watch (15.8%), and microbiome (13.3%). Older adults (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41–0.87) were less likely to want their genetic results returned next. Forty percent of participants reported that they would not share all returned results with their non–study clinicians. Black (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43–0.95) and Asian (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30–0.73) participants were less likely, and older participants more likely (OR 1.45–1.61), to plan to share all results with their clinician than their counterparts. At enrollment, 5.8% of participants opted out of receiving their genetics results. The study showed that substantial heterogeneity existed in participant’s preferences and expectations for return of results, and variations were related to sociodemographic characteristics.

Background Endothelial dysfunction in the nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway is a potential contributor to perioperative myocardial ischemia. The nitric oxide precursor, l-arginine, and the cyclic guanosine monophosphate degradation blocker, sildenafil, have vasodilatory effects under high dosage. Objective This study examined the hemodynamic safety and effect profiles of the combined administration of l-arginine and sildenafil using an in-vivo pig model. Methods Hemodynamic safety including mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, heart rate, coronary vascular resistance, and systemic vascular resistance, as well as effect profiles including cardiac output and left anterior descending blood flow were measured in ten female swine after administrations of l-arginine, sildenafil, as well as combined l-arginine and sildenafil. Measurements were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance and linear mixed models. Results The combination of l-arginine and sildenafil produced a significant dose-dependent increase in left anterior descending flow and cardiac output. In contrast, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure, coronary vascular resistance, and systemic vascular resistance did not show any significant changes. No significant change in serum osmolality was observed after administrations of l-arginine. Conclusions The combined intravenous administration of sildenafil and l-arginine in a porcine animal model was safe, well tolerated, and had at least additive effects on left anterior descending artery blood flow. Simultaneous application of both drugs might have dose-sparing effects leading to desired coronary effects at lower and safer sildenafil and l-arginine plasma concentrations. Hyperosmolality was only a minor factor in l-arginine hemodynamic effects.