1. Saliva sampling for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infections in symptomatic patients and asymptomatic carriers
- Author
-
Jacques Izopet, Pierre Delobel, Catherine Mengelle, Jean-Michel Mansuy, Marion Migueres, M. Alvarez, Alain Didier, Chloé Dimeglio, Laboratoire de Virologie [Toulouse], CHU Toulouse [Toulouse], Centre de Physiopathologie Toulouse Purpan (CPTP), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Service de pneumologie et allergologie pédiatrique [CHU Toulouse], Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales [Toulouse], Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-CHU Toulouse [Toulouse]-Hôpital Purpan [Toulouse], Laboratoire Virologie [CHU Toulouse], Institut Fédératif de Biologie (IFB), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse)-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse)-Pôle Biologie [CHU Toulouse], Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), Service Pneumologie et allergologie pédiatrique [CHU Toulouse], Pôle Enfants [CHU Toulouse], Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse)-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), Service Maladies infectieuses et tropicales [CHU Toulouse], Pôle Inflammation, infection, immunologie et loco-moteur [CHU Toulouse] (Pôle I3LM Toulouse), and PINIER, CHRISTINE
- Subjects
MESH: Coronavirus ,Saliva ,medicine.disease_cause ,0302 clinical medicine ,COVID-19 Testing ,[SDV.MHEP.MI]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Infectious diseases ,MESH: COVID-19 ,Medicine ,Sampling (medicine) ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Coronavirus ,0303 health sciences ,biology ,3. Good health ,Infectious Diseases ,[SDV.MHEP.MI] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Infectious diseases ,MESH: Betacoronavirus ,Coronavirus Infections ,MESH: Pneumonia, Viral / epidemiology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,2019-20 coronavirus outbreak ,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ,Pneumonia, Viral ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,Betacoronavirus ,MESH: Coronavirus Infections / diagnosis ,Virology ,Internal medicine ,Humans ,MESH: SARS-CoV-2 ,MESH: Saliva ,MESH: Coronavirus Infections / epidemiology ,Pandemics ,MESH: Clinical Laboratory Techniques ,MESH: Humans ,030306 microbiology ,business.industry ,Clinical Laboratory Techniques ,SARS-CoV-2 ,MESH: COVID-19 Testing ,COVID-19 ,medicine.disease ,biology.organism_classification ,Pneumonia ,MESH: Pandemics ,business ,Asymptomatic carrier - Abstract
International audience; In a recent review of laboratory tests for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection, Zheng et al. concluded that the detection rate of real-time quantitative PCR was lower than that of computed tomography [1]. But the authors did not discuss the possibility of using saliva sampling. Nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs are the preferred collection vehicles in France and many other countries and several studies have indicated that this method is more sensitive than sampling other sites [2–4]. Saliva sampling is less invasive for patients, less hazardous for health care workers, requires fewer experimented staff and is less expensive for mass testing. However, little is known about any differences in the sensitivities of saliva and NP sampling or how any differences vary with presence or absence of clinical symptoms
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF