1. A Collaborative Intervention Between Emergency Medicine and Infectious Diseases to Increase Syphilis and HIV Screening in the Emergency Department
- Author
-
Jose A. Bazan, Susan L. Koletar, Mohammad Mahdee Sobhanie, Michael Dick, Brandon Pollak, Sommer Lindsey, Kushal Nandam, Mark E. Lustberg, Carlos Malvestutto, and Ashley A Lipps
- Subjects
Microbiology (medical) ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Gonorrhea ,Sexually Transmitted Diseases ,HIV Infections ,Dermatology ,Hiv testing ,Original Studies ,HIV Testing ,Intervention (counseling) ,medicine ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,Syphilis ,Infectious disease (athletes) ,Chlamydia ,business.industry ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,virus diseases ,HIV screening ,Emergency department ,Chlamydia Infections ,medicine.disease ,humanities ,Infectious Diseases ,Emergency medicine ,Emergency Medicine ,Emergency Service, Hospital ,business - Abstract
This study reports that focused collaboration between infectious diseases and emergency medicine providers results in increased identification of patients with syphilis and HIV in the emergency department., Background Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a common reason for evaluation in the emergency department (ED). Given the overlapping risk factors for STIs, patients screened for gonorrhea and chlamydia should be tested for syphilis and HIV. Syphilis and HIV testing rates in the ED have been reported to be low. The study objective was to examine whether collaboration between emergency medicine (EM) and infectious disease (ID) providers improved syphilis and HIV testing in the ED. Methods A multidisciplinary team of EM and ID providers was formed to identify and address barriers to syphilis and HIV testing in the ED. Syphilis, HIV, chlamydia, and gonorrhea testing and infection rates were calculated and compared during 2 time periods: preintervention (January 1, 2012–December 30, 2017) and postintervention (November 1, 2018–November 30, 2019). We also extracted clinical and laboratory data from patients with positive syphilis and HIV results during the study period. Results The most commonly cited barrier to syphilis and HIV testing was concern about follow-up of positive results. Compared with the preintervention period, syphilis and HIV testing rates increased significantly in the postintervention period (incidence rate ratios, 30.70 [P < 0.0001] and 28.99 [P < 0.0001] for syphilis and HIV, respectively). The postintervention period was also associated with a significant increase in the identification of patients with positive syphilis and HIV results (incidence rate ratios, 7.02 [P < 0.0001] and 2.34 [P = 0.03], respectively). Conclusions Collaboration between EM and ID providers resulted in a significant increase in syphilis and HIV testing and diagnosis in the ED.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF