Search

PURPOSE CNS relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is associated with poor prognosis with a median survival of about 2.5 months. Data demonstrating best prophylactic strategy remain controversial and need further definition. PATIENTS AND METHODS We present data of 110 patients with DLBCL treated with standard systemic therapy divided into four groups based on primary CNS prophylaxis strategy and CNS International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk categories. We compared their 3-year CNS relapse rate and overall survival in each group. RESULTS The CNS prophylaxis strategy consisted of intrathecal (IT) methotrexate (MTX) in group 1, high-dose (HD) MTX in group 2, combination IT and HD MTX in group 3, and IT and/or HD MTX with intensive chemotherapy in group 4. At 3 years, CNS relapse rate was 8.6% (4/46), 8.3% (1/12), 4.8% (2/42), and 18% (2/11) in groups 1-4 ( P = .64), respectively. According to CNS IPI, the CNS relapse rate was 16.6%, 10.1%, and 0% in high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rate was 69%, 75%, 80%, and 45% in groups 1-4 ( P = .71), respectively. CONCLUSION Our study while did not find statistical significance did indicate a lower incidence of CNS relapse with the addition of systemic HD MTX to IT MTX in the high-risk DLBCL population.

Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a monoclonal disorder characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of mature B lymphocytes. CD26 is a multi-functional type II cell surface glycoprotein, which is expressed mainly by T lymphocyte and it has a regulatory role in progression and also in migration and metastasis of tumour. Objective: The aim of the work was to assess the regulatory role and expression of CD26 in patients with B-CLL and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) and the relation to disease staging and progression. Methods: This study was conducted on 6 patients with B-CLL and 5 patients with NHL who were attending at National Cancer Institute. We detected functional role and specificity of CD26 by flow cytometry during the period from December 2019 to March 2020. The ages of patients ranged from 42 to 79 years old. Besides, 5 healthy individuals worked as control group. Results: A significant difference was found as regards expression of CD26 in CLL cases in comparison to control cases (p.0001). Also there was a significant difference between the NHL group and control group in expression of CD26 (p.0001). But no significant difference was detected between the NHL groups and CLL groups in expression of CD26 (p.052). Conclusion: This study confirmed that CD26 expression in CLL and NHL is variable and didn’t correlate with other prognostic factors. In addition, there was no significant difference between the NHL groups and CLL groups in expression of CD26

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is a disease spectrum of multiple subtypes with many potential targets. Given the heterogeneity and evolving landscape for targeted therapy, incorporation of therapeutics in th...

Cavernous sinus (CS) lymphoma without paranasal sinuses involvement is extremely rare in pediatric population and remains a diagnostic challenge due to its similarity to other tumors located in this area. An 8-year-old boy presented with a 6-day history of gradually developing ptosis in the right eyelid. After admission, his symptoms progressed within 24 h to include right-sided ophthalmoplegia consisting of oculomotor and abducens nerve palsies. Endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) was performed urgently to decompress the CS and to obtain a diagnosis. The postoperative course was uneventful, and there was no complication related to the surgical approach. No immunodeficiency was identified. The histopathological diagnosis was an Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive high-grade mature B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. He was initiated chemotherapy according to COG ANHL01P1 protocol. Two months after surgery, the third and sixth nerve palsies had resolved completely. Currently, he is well and has no clinical or radiological recurrence. This is the first pediatric case with EBV-positive CS lymphoma that underwent EEA for the diagnosis and decompression. In the pediatric population, EEA enables minimally invasive access to the CS and can play an alternative role in the management of CS lesions, either through biopsy or debulking.

The prognosis for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) remains poor, with a need for alternatives to current salvage therapies. Loncastuximab tesirine (ADCT-402) is an antibody-drug conjugate comprising a humanized anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody conjugated to a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer toxin. Presented here are final results of a phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study in patients with R/R B-NHL. Objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose(s) for expansion and evaluate safety, clinical activity, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of loncastuximab tesirine. Overall, 183 patients received loncastuximab tesirine, with 3 + 3 dose escalation at 15 to 200 µg/kg and dose expansion at 120 and 150 µg/kg. Dose-limiting toxicities (all hematologic) were reported in 4 patients. The MTD was not reached, although cumulative toxicity was higher at 200 µg/kg. Hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events were most common, followed by fatigue, nausea, edema, and liver enzyme abnormalities. Overall response rate (ORR) in evaluable patients was 45.6%, including 26.7% complete responses (CRs). ORRs in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma were 42.3%, 46.7%, and 78.6%, respectively. Median duration of response in all patients was 5.4 months and not reached in patients with DLBCL (doses ≥120 µg/kg) who achieved a CR. Loncastuximab tesirine had good stability in serum, notable antitumor activity, and an acceptable safety profile, warranting continued study in B-NHL. The recommended dose for phase 2 was determined as 150 µg/kg every 3 weeks for 2 doses followed by 75 µg/kg every 3 weeks. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02669017.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) have recently emerged as an active therapy for patients with relapse or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) [1]. Clinical trials using ant...

Aim: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Materials & methods: A meta-analysis was conducted using eligible clinical trials, which were obtained from electronic medical literature databases. Results: A total of 24 clinical trials with 590 patients were included. The best overall response rate was 66% and complete remission rate was 46%. The incidence rates of cytokine-release syndrome and neurotoxicity (grade ≥ 3) were 9 and 5%, respectively. The various clinical factors were analyzed. Autogenic CAR-T cell may lead to improved efficacy than allogeneic CAR-T cell. CD20 CAR-T cell may show increased efficacy than CD19 CAR-T cell. Conclusion: CAR-T immunotherapy has remarkable efficacy and low toxicity in relapsed/refractory B-NHL.

We developed an outpatient salvage chemotherapy regimen using bendamustine, ofatumumab, carboplatin and etoposide (BOCE) to treat relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (RR NHL) in a single-center phase I/II study. Primary objectives were safety, tolerability and overall response rate (ORR). Thirty-five RR NHL patients (57% de novo large cell [DLBCL] or grade 3B follicular [FL], 26% transformed DLBCL, 9% grade 3A FL, 3% mantle cell; median age = 62, median prior therapies = 1) were treated. Median follow-up was 24.1 months. ORR was 69% (CR = 49%, PR = 20% [ORR = 70%, CR = 50%, PR = 20% in the de novo DLBCL/grade 3B FL subgroup]). Median progression-free survival was 5.1 months and overall-survival 26.2 months. Twelve patients subsequently underwent stem cell transplantation. The most common non-hematologic grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenic fever and hypophosphatemia. There were no treatment-related deaths. In conclusion, BOCE is a safe and effective outpatient salvage regimen for patients with RR NHL and serves as an effective bridge to stem cell transplantation.

Background Interstitial pneumonia (IP) is a common and fatal adverse effect of rituximab-containing immunochemotherapy in lymphoma patients. Following prophylactic treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), the clinical features, treatment, and risk factors for IP development remain largely undefined. Methods From April 2015 and April 2018, 294 patients diagnosed with CD20+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) were included in this study. All patients received front-line RCHOP-like chemotherapy and prophylactic treatment of TMP-SMX once daily. We summarized the clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment outcomes of IP in these patients and explored the possible risk factors of IP. Results The overall incidence of IP was 8.16%. Typical clinical symptoms included fever for 1–3 days in 11 patients, dyspnea in 4 patients, expectoration in 5 patients, and dry cough in 7 patients. A total of 8 patients showed no apparent symptoms. Prior to IP, the median number of chemotherapy cycles was 4. The median time for IP initiation was 63 days, and the median duration of IP treatment was 11 days. All patients recovered from IP after treatment. A total of 6 patients continued to receive chemotherapy without rituximab, and 14 patients received rituximab combined with chemotherapy. No patients experienced IP recurrence. In univariate and multivariate analysis, male, diabetes, low lymphocyte counts (

B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHLs) are the most frequent hematologic malignant cancers. Molecular targeted therapy is an important aspect of B-NHL treatment alongside cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy.Molecular targeted therapies have changed the landscape of treatment strategies for B-NHLs since the approval of rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1997. Currently, several targeted therapies have been approved or are in the later-phase of clinical trials including naked antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and small molecules, such as Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3 K) inhibitors, enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) inhibitors, and B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) inhibitors. These drugs have various toxicities because of their unique mechanisms of action. In this review, the available toxicity data of the targeted therapies for B-NHLs have been summarized.Recent clinical developments of targeted therapies for B-NHLs have provided several useful effective therapeutic options for patients. However, there are unique toxicities that need to be resolved. It is necessary to find out the toxicity mechanism; optimal treatment strategy for these toxicities; and novel targeted therapies that might potentially overcome the toxicities of previously approved targeted therapies.

Purpose The CD79b-targeted antibody–drug conjugate polatuzumab vedotin (pola), alone and with chemoimmunotherapy, has clinical efficacy and a tolerable safety profile in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). We assessed (a) whether exposure from global studies of pola is comparable to Asian patients, and (b) if the recommended pola dose is appropriate in Asian patients based on exposure. Methods The pharmacokinetics (PK) of pola in Asian and global populations was characterized for three analytes (antibody-conjugated monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) [acMMAE], total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE) in five phase 1b/2 single-agent and combination studies in B-NHL patients (JO29138 [JAPICCTI‐142580], DCS4968g [NCT01290549], GO27834 [NCT01691898], GO29044 [NCT01992653], and GO29365 [NCT02257567]). PK data were compared between Japanese phase 1 JO29138 (JAPICCTI‐142580) and global phase 1 DCS4968g (NCT01290549) studies and between Asian and non-Asian patients in the randomized relapsed/refractory B-NHL cohorts of the phase 1b/2 study GO29365 (NCT02257567). A population PK (popPK) model was used to assess the effects of Asian race and region on acMMAE and unconjugated MMAE exposure. Results PK non-compartmental analysis (NCA) parameters for the key analyte acMMAE in the Japanese JO29138 (JAPICCTI‐142580) and global phase 1 DCS4968g (NCT01290549) studies were similar. In GO29365 (NCT02257567), the phase 1b/2 combination study, mean exposure to the analytes was generally lower in Asian patients (by ~ 9.9 to 17.5%), but not to a clinically meaningful extent. Overall, the popPK model further suggested comparable PK in Asian patients with B-NHL (race or region) versus non-Asian patients. Conclusion Race has no clinically meaningful effect on pola PK. These results (and observations from efficacy/safety exposure–response analyses) support no pola dose adjustments are warranted for Asian patients with DLBCL.

Burkitt lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma are the most common aggressive pediatric mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHLs). Despite excellent survival with current chemotherapy regimens, therapy for Burkitt lymphoma and DLBCL has a high incidence of short- and long-term toxicities. Patients who experience relapse generally have a very poor prognosis. Therefore, novel approaches using targeted therapies to reduce toxicities and improve outcomes in the relapse setting are needed. The addition of rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against CD20, to upfront therapy has improved survival outcomes for high-risk patients and may allow decreased total chemotherapy in those with low-risk disease. Antibody–drug conjugates have been combined with chemotherapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) NHL, and multiple antibody–drug conjugates are in development. Additionally, bispecific T-cell–engaging antibody constructs and autologous CAR T-cells have been successful in the treatment of R/R acute leukemias and are now being applied to R/R B-NHL with some successes. PD-L1 and PD-L2 on tumor cells can be targeted with checkpoint inhibitors, which restore T-cell–mediated immunity and antitumor responses and can be added to conventional chemotherapy and immune-directed therapies to augment responses. Lastly, trials of small molecule inhibitors targeting cell signaling pathways in NHL subtypes are underway. This article reviews many of the targeted therapies under development that could be considered for future trials in R/R pediatric mature B-NHL.

Cadmium and lead are persistent environmental toxins that are known or probable carcinogens, based on evidence for causality for nonhematologic cancers. Associations of these metals with risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM) are unknown but biologically plausible. To examine the associations of circulating levels of lead and cadmium exposure with risk of B-cell NHL (B-NHL) and multiple myeloma, we conducted a nested case-control study among 299 incident B-cell NHLs and 76 MM cases within the Cancer Prevention Study-II Nutrition Cohort (CPS-II NC). Each case was incidence-density matched to two eligible controls on age, race, sex and blood draw date. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for lymphoid malignancies overall and stratified by subtype. We observed a significant positive association between high erythrocyte lead concentration and risk of lymphoid malignancies overall (RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02-1.33 per 17.6 μg/L (1 standard deviation [SD])) and follicular lymphoma in particular (RR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.15-2.80 per SD). In contrast, there was no association between erythrocyte cadmium and risk of B-NHL (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.75-1.06 per 0.37 μg/L [1 SD]), or any B-NHL subtypes; but a strong inverse association with MM risk (RR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.38-0.89, per SD). Results from our study suggest a positive association between erythrocyte lead level and risk of lymphoid malignancies and a possible inverse association between cadmium and myeloma. Additional research is needed to confirm and further explore these findings.

Angiogenesis is critical for the initiation and progression of solid tumors, as well as hematological malignancies. While angiogenesis in solid tumors has been well characterized, a large body of investigation is devoted to clarify the impact of angiogenesis on lymphoma development. B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) is the most common lymphoid malignancy with a highly heterogeneity. The malignancy remains incurable despite that the addition of rituximab to conventional chemotherapies provides substantial improvements. Several angiogenesis-related parameters, such as proangiogenic factors, circulating endothelial cells, microvessel density, and tumor microenvironment, have been identified as prognostic indicators in different types of B-NHL. A better understanding of how these factors work together to facilitate lymphoma-specific angiogenesis will help to design better antiangiogenic strategies. So far, VEGF-A monoclonal antibodies, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting VEGF receptors, and immunomodulatory drugs with antiangiogenic activities are being tested in preclinical and clinical studies. This review summarizes recent advances in the understanding of the role of angiogenesis in B-NHL, and discusses the applications of antiangiogenic therapies.

Purpose The epidemiology of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (BNHL) in Asia is not well described, and rates of second primary malignancies (SPM) in these patients are not known. We aimed to describe temporal changes in BNHL epidemiology and SPM incidence in Korea. Materials and methods A retrospective cohort study used claims data from the National Health Insurance Service that provides universal healthcare coverage in Korea. Newly diagnosed patients aged at least 19 years with a confirmed diagnosis of one of six BNHL subtypes (diffuse large cell B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], small lymphocytic and chronic lymphocytic [CLL/SLL], follicular lymphoma [FL], mantle cell lymphoma [MCL], marginal zone lymphoma [MZL], and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia [WM]) during the period 2006-2015 were enrolled and followed up until death, dis-enrolment, or study end, whichever occurred first. Patients with pre-existing primary cancers prior to the diagnosis of BNHL were excluded. Results A total of 19,500 patients with newly diagnosed BNHL were identified out of 27,866 with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). DLBCL was the most frequently diagnosed subtype (41.9%-48.4% of NHL patients annually, 2011-2015). Standardized incidence of the six subtypes studied per 100,000 population increased from 5.74 in 2011 to 6.96 in 2015, with most increases in DLBCL, FL, and MZL. The incidence (95% confidence interval) of SPM per 100 person-years was 2.74 (2.26-3.29) for CLL/SLL, 2.43 (1.57-3.58) for MCL, 2.41 (2.10-2.76) for MZL, 2.23 (2.07-2.40) for DLBCL, 1.97 (1.61-2.38) for FL, and 1.41 (0.69-2.59) for WM. Conclusion BNHL has been increasingly diagnosed in Korea. High rates of SPM highlight the need for continued close monitoring to ensure early diagnosis and treatment.

Primary pulmonary non-Hodgkin lymphoma is a rare entity, accounting for 3-4% of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Indolent primary pulmonary non-Hodgkin lymphomas are the most frequent types, with the MALT subtype representing majority of cases. Other indolent subtypes of B-cell primary pulmonary lymphomas are rare. We present the case of a 56-year-old patient, non-smoker, who presents for pain in the right hemithorax, worsened by deep inhales. Pulmonary X-ray showed a right paramediastinal superior and medial lobe homogenous opacity with faded contour. Thoracic computed tomography scan described a dense right superior mediastino-pulmonary tumoral mass, the absence of hilar or mediastinal adenopathies. In this context, an ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration was performed. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry confirmed the diagnosis of primary pulmonary small B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. After 6 chemotherapy cycles, from a clinical and imagistic (thoracic CT scan) point of view, the response was favourable. Positron emission tomography (PET/CT) aspect indicated a complete metabolic response to treatment.

Primary B-Cell Non Hodgkin Lymphoma of Breast is a rare presentation of breast malignancy and it is necessary to differentiate it from secondary breast lymphoma as prognosis and treatment varies based on the diagnosis. We present a case of 47-year-old female with bilateral PBNHL of Breast which is rare due to younger age of presentation than earlier reported cases of this malignancy, lump with “peau de orange” appearance seen in both the breasts which is usually seen with high grade lymphoma and complete recovery of the patient while bilateral PBL outlines poor prognosis. Mammosonography findings included dilated ducts with hypoechoiec areas. MRI showed altered signal intensity. Findings of the imaging studies are non-specific and vary widely from case to case which is why biopsy which is gold standard was done to confirm the diagnosis.

To the editor:Progress continues to be made regarding the treatment of children and adolescents with aggressive B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL). Recent data demonstrated patients with mature B-ce...

Growing evidence now suggests that circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has great potential as a non-invasive biomarker for disease monitoring, since ctDNA carries tumour-specific modifications. In particular, monitoring ctDNA has important implications for identifying patients with haematological malignancies at clinical risk of disease progression. We hereby describe three patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and investigate the clinical value of sequential ctDNA profiling for the early detection of tumour relapse. Somatic mutations in diagnostic tumour biopsy samples of these three patients were identified by applying high-throughput next-generation sequencing. Droplet digital PCR probes and primers were designed and tested for each hotspot mutation. Serial ctDNA analysis was subsequently conducted among these three patients. We found that the longitudinal monitoring of plasma ctDNA could predict for at least one month in advance compared with flow cytometry, cytology and conventional imaging modalities. Therefore, our results support liquid biopsy based on ctDNA as a non-invasive complementary modality to other detection methods for detecting early relapse and contribute to more precise management for non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients.

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a common aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). While combined chemotherapy has improved the outcomes of DLBCL, it remains a highly detrimental disease. Pyroptosis, an inflammatory programmed cell death, is considered to have both tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressing effects. The role of pyroptosis in DLBCL has been gradually appreciated, but its value needs further investigation.Methods: We analyzed mutations and copy number variation (CNV) alterations of pyroptosis-related genes (PRGs) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort and evaluated the differences in expression in normal B cells and DLBCL patients in two Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets (GSE12195 and GSE56315). Based on the expression of 52 PRGs, we divided 421 DLBCL patients from the GSE31312 dataset into distinct clusters using consensus clustering. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to prognosis among the three clusters, and GSVA was used to explore differences in the biological functions. ESTIMATE and single-sample gene-set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) were used to analyze the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) in different clusters. A risk score signature was developed using a univariate survival analysis and multivariate regression analysis, and the reliability and validity of the signature were verified. By combining the signature with clinical factors, a nomogram was established to predict the prognosis of DLBCL patients. The alluvial diagram and correlation matrix were used to explore the relationship between pyroptosis risk score, clinical features and TME.Results: A large proportion of PRGs are dysregulated in DLBCL and associated with the prognosis. We found three distinct pyroptosis-related clusters (cluster A, B, and C) that differed significantly with regard to the prognosis, biological process, clinical characteristics, chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity, and TME. Furthermore, we developed a risk score signature that effectively differentiates high and low-risk patients. The nomogram combining this signature with several clinical indicators showed an excellent ability to predict the prognosis of DCBCL patients.Conclusions: This work demonstrates that pyroptosis plays an important role in the diversity and complexity of the TME in DLBCL. The risk signature of pyroptosis is a promising predictive tool. A correct and comprehensive assessment of the mode of action of pyroptosis in individuals will help guide more effective treatment.

Background: Low-grade B cell Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) are a group of lymphomas that are predominantly indolent and make up approximately 50% of all malignant lymphomas. Initial therapy for low-grade B cell LNH has an overall response rate of between 85-94% and a refractory rate of 6-10%. Few reports have been published regarding the clinicopathological characteristics of non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases, especially low-grade B cell types. This research aims to determine the clinicopathological profile of low-grade B cell type non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases. Method: This research is a descriptive study using cross-sectional methods. The sample consisted of 40 low-grade B cell type NHL cases from January 2015 to June 2020 at Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung. Clinicopathological data, including age, sex, location of the tumor (nodal or extranodal), stage, B symptoms, and response to therapy, were taken from the patients’ medical records. Data were categorized into 2 groups based on response to initial therapy. Results and Discussion: Of the 40 cases diagnosed with low-grade B cell type NHL, 55% responded to initial therapy. From the non-response group, 61.1% were stage II and 72.2% exhibited B symptoms. There were no significant differences in age, sex, tumor location (nodal or extranodal), stage, or B symptoms in the response and non-response groups. Conclusion: In this study, 45% of patients with low-grade B cell type NHL did not respond to initial therapy. There was no statistically significant difference in the clinicopathological profiles of the response and non-response groups to initial therapy in cases of low-grade B cell type NHL. Keywords: Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, low-grade B cell lymphoma, therapy response, clinicopathological

Aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) accounts for ≈60% of NHL in children/adolescents. In newly diagnosed Burkitt lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, short intensive multiagent chemotherapy is associated with a five-year event-free survival of around 90%. Very few children/adolescents with aggressive B-NHL show a relapsed/refractory (r/r) disease. The outcome is poor, with cure rates

International audience; The association between B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) is well demonstrated by epidemiological studies. Most studies concerning this association have been conducted in endemic areas. Thus, little is known concerning the clinical characteristics of HBV-related lymphomas in non-endemic areas. Here, we report the characteristics and outcomes of 39 patients with active HBV infection and B-cell NHL collected retrospectively in France and Italy. We also compared their characteristics with those of HCV-positive patients with NHL. The gender ratio (M/F) was 3.3 and the median age at NHL diagnosis, 59 years. The pathological distribution was 24 (62%) diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) and 15 (38%) other lymphomas subtypes: marginal zone lymphoma (n = 6), follicular lymphoma (n = 3), mantle cell lymphoma (n = 2), Burkitt's lymphoma (n = 1), and not otherwise specified low-grade B-NHL (n = 3). Treatment included antiviral therapy for 35 patients (90%). Twenty-two (92%) DLBCL patients received an R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimen, leading to complete remission for 18 (75%).At one year, 21 DLBCL patients (88%) were alive, and 13 other B-cell lymphoma patients (87%) were alive. This European study underscores the predominance of DLBCL among patients with active HBV infection and their similar outcomes to non-HBV infected patients with DLBCL when treated with R-CHOP and antivirals.

Lymphomas are the third-most common cancer of the oral cavity after squamous cell carcinomas and salivary gland tumors. It is characterized by proliferation of lymphoid cells and their precursor. Diffuse B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma is the most common histological type of lymphoma in the head-and-neck region and most commonly affects older men in their seventh decade of life.

CAR T-cells are autologous T-cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor which targets the modified T-cell against a specified cancer antigen. Anti-CD19 CAR T-cells currently represent transformational therapy for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas where durable remissions can be induced in patients with previously incurable chemotherapy-refractory disease. Three anti-CD19 CAR T-cells are currently Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approved or in advanced-stage development: axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel. Although all targeting CD19 on the surface of malignant (and healthy) B-cells, these products differ from one another in multiple ways including construct, manufacturing, dose, design of pivotal clinical trials, and toxicity profile. Efficacy and safety data for anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in aggressive B-cell lymphomas will be reviewed, as well as novel CAR T-cell designs and strategies for overcoming treatment resistance.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (YESCARTA; Kite Pharma, a Gilead Company, Los Angeles CA) and tisagenlecleucel (KYMRIAH; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., Basel, Switzerland) are two CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell products currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration; the European Medicines Agency; Health Canada; Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (Japan); and Therapeutic Goods Administration (Australia) for treatment of specific subtypes of relapsed/refractory aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Although this approval has been transformative in the use of cellular immunotherapy in lymphoma, there are concerns regarding appropriate use of this novel therapy and of short- and long-term toxicities. To address these issues, representatives of the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy convened to recognize and address key issues surrounding the clinical application of CD19 CAR T cell therapy in B cell lymphomas, in collaboration with worldwide experts. The aim of this article is to provide consensus opinion from experts in the fields of hematopoietic cell transplantation, cellular immunotherapy, and lymphoma regarding key clinical questions pertinent to the use of CD19 CAR T cell products for the treatment of NHL. As the clinical practice using CAR T cells grows worldwide, we anticipate that this guidance will be relevant for hematology/oncology physicians who care for patients with lymphomas.

Targeting both CD20 and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), a protein that is critically involved in B-cell maturation, could be an efficacious strategy for treating B-cell malignancies. The safety of the next-generation compounds umbralisib, a PI3K-δ inhibitor, plus ublituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (combination referred to as U2), was evaluated in patients with chronic lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in this phase 1/1b study. Phase 1 dose escalation was performed with a 3 + 3 design to establish the maximum tolerated dose. In this portion, ublituximab was given intravenously (NHL, 900 mg; CLL, 600 or 900 mg) for 12 cycles. Umbralisib was given orally once daily at 800 or 1200 mg (initial formulation) or 400 to 1200 mg (micronized formulation) in the phase 1 dose escalation portion, and at 800 to 1200 mg in the phase 1b portion until progression, toxicity, or study removal. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached in either the CLL or NHL cohort, and only 1 dose-limiting toxicity was observed. U2 had low instances of grade 3 or higher diarrhea (8%), pneumonia (8%), or hepatic toxicity (4%). Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 13% of patients, and umbralisib dose reductions occurred in 15% of patients. The overall response rate for all patients was 46% with 17% complete responses. The median duration of response was 20 months (95% confidence interval, 11.3-not reached). U2 was well tolerated, and no new safety signals were observed over single-agent umbralisib. Preliminary efficacy with this combination is promising and warrants further investigation. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02006485.

Blinatumomab, the first-in-class CD3/CD19 bispecific T-cell engager antibody construct, has recently been approved for treating patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, the clinical proof of concept of blinatumomab efficacy was initially demonstrated in patients with R/R B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) in the MT103-104 phase 1 dose-escalation and expansion trial (NCT00274742), which defined 60 µg/m2 per day as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The clinically most relevant adverse effects were neurologic symptoms and cytokine release syndrome. Currently, there are no data on long-term outcomes and toxicity for B-NHL patients receiving blinatumomab treatment, so we performed a single-center, long-term follow-up analysis of 38 patients who participated in the MT103-104 phase 1 trial. We found no evidence for long-term toxicities, especially no blinatumomab-induced neurocognitive impairments. For the entire study population, the median overall survival (OS) was 4.6 years. Remarkably, patients who had received ≥60 µg/m2 per day and responded to blinatumomab achieved a median OS of 7.7 years. Of note, 6 of the surviving patients treated at the MTD have been treatment-free for more than 7 years. In contrast, patients who were treated at dose levels below the MTD had a median OS of only 1.1 years. These results indicate that 60 µg/m2 per day seems to represent the targeted dose level of blinatumomab required for durable remission in R/R B-NHL. Here, we provide the first clinical evidence that blinatumomab lacks long-term toxicity and has the potential to induce sustained remissions in patients with R/R B-NHL.

Introduction: Traditionally, outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma have been poor. There has been a clear need for effective therapeutic options that could produce durable remissions with a reasonable safety profile. The approval of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies has been revolutionary in the field because CAR T-cells meet this need for a substantial number of patients. With multiple approved CAR T-cell products and more expected soon, it can be difficult to distinguish between the various products and decide which to use. Effective CAR T-cell therapeutic choice is enhanced by an understanding of the biology of CAR T-cell, as well as the mechanisms associated with both efficacy and toxicity. Areas Covered: Biology of CAR T-cells, as well as a discussion of their efficacy and toxicity. Mechanisms of resistance, current unanswered questions in the field, issues associated with choosing a CAR T-cell product, and future directions for the advancement of CAR T-cell therapy. Expert Opinion: Due to differences in study populations and manufacturing times, it is too early to know if there is a 'best' choice for CAR T-cell therapy. Decisions must be individualized taking into account patient factors and expected toxicity.

Purpose of Review Rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy has resulted in a marked improvement in the survival of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We reflect upon the history front-line (1L) therapy and highlight advances in management. Recent Findings Since the introduction of R-CHOP, the majority of randomized studies in the front-line treatment of DLBCL have failed to show a benefit. Such studies have involved treatment intensification, adding novel agents to the R-CHOP backbone and targeting such novel agents to biologically defined subgroups. R-CHOP therefore remains standard-of-care for most but new insights into the molecular biology of these diseases, and the development of active targeted molecules offers promise for the future. Accumulating evidence in the very elderly suggests dose attenuation does not compromise survival. Intensification in primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma may avoid the need for radiotherapy, but must be balanced against the risks. PET-CT- and ctDNA-based response assessment may now enable response adapted therapy and early prognostication, improving patient selection and potentially outcomes. Summary Novel technologies and therapies in combination with novel molecular diagnostics will likely become the standard-of-care approach for the personalized therapy of DLBCL but need to be proven in well-designed and conducted randomized trials.

This multicenter phase II study (UMIN000008145) aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of six cycles of combination therapy (RBD) comprising rituximab, bendamustine, and dexamethasone (DEX) for relapsed or refractory (RR) indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Although the initial study protocol comprised 20 mg/body DEX on days 1 and 2, and 10 mg/body on days 3-5 [high-dose (HD-) DEX group], the dose of DEX was later decreased to 8 mg/body on days 1 and 2 [low-dose (LD-) DEX group] due to frequent cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia and recurrent retinitis. We enrolled 33 patients, and LD-DEX and HD-DEX were administered in 15 and 18 patients, respectively. The overall response and the 3-year progression-free survival rates were 88% and 75.5%, respectively. The leading adverse event was myelosuppression. Incidence of grade 3-4 leukocytopenia, neutropenia, and lymphocytopenia was 55%, 67%, and 91%, respectively. The most frequent nonhematological adverse events were CMV antigenemia and rash (33% and 30%, respectively). Incidence of CMV antigenemia over 10/100,000 white blood cells was significantly lower with LD-DEX than that with HD-DEX (P = 0.0127). In conclusion, RBD showed significant effectiveness for RR indolent B-NHL and MCL.

Background Previous studies examining the relationship between hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) show inconsistent results in different endemic areas. Furthermore, studies evaluating the association between stratified HBV status and NHL with a well-matched case-control design are rare. Methods We conducted a 1:2 case-control study enrolling 3502 NHL cases and 7004 controls, and performed an updated meta-analysis evaluating the association between HBV and NHL subtypes. Results The HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive/anti-HBs-positive population, implying naturally acquired immunity after infection, had increased B-NHL risk (Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) (95% confidence interval (95% CI)): 2.25 (1.96–2.57)). The HBsAg-positive/HBeAg-positive population, indicating current HBV infection, had high risk of B-NHL (AOR (95% CI): 6.23 (3.95–9.82)). Specifically, for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), there was no significant difference in HBsAg status between the germinal centre B (GCB) and non-GCB subtypes. Additionally, our meta-analysis showed in a random effects model, HBV-infected individuals had a pooled OR of 2.09 (95% CI 1.76–2.50; P

Since 2000, an adapted LMB 96 protocol was implemented at the Children-Welfare-Teaching-Hospital in Baghdad for the treatment of childhood B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The first experience (2000-2005) demonstrated efficacy and feasibility of this protocol in Iraq. In 2006, further adjustments were made in an attempt to reduce therapy-related toxicities. The outcome of the second cohort of 190 children (2006-2010) and the comparison with the previous study are hereby reported. Out of the 180 treated patients, 120 achieved a complete response; during treatment 51 died and 9 abandoned. The 60-month overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 64.7 and 56.3%, respectively. No differences were observed in the 24-month OS and EFS between the 2000-2005 and 2006-2010 cohorts (66.3% vs. 65.1%; p = .89 and 53.3% vs. 57.3%; p = .28, respectively). Therapeutic group-B in the second cohort showed better outcome, although not significant, compared to the first one (EFS 62.9% vs. 53.8%; p = .088). Therapy-related mortality remained high.

Background Rituximab is widely used as a key component of immunochemotherapy to treat B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). However, infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during drug administration are occasionally severe or even life-threatening and thus remain problematic for patients and healthcare providers. Aim To minimize IRRs to rituximab in patients with various types of B-NHL. Method: We stratified patients into low- (n = 39), moderate- (n = 35), and high-risk (n = 7) groups according to the number of risk factors, specifically, an indolent histology and the presence of bulky tumors (> 10 cm). For the first rituximab cycle, the low- and moderate-risk groups underwent conventional infusion #1 (~ 4.3 h), and the high-risk group underwent long infusion (6.8 h). Patients in the low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups without IRRs in the first cycle underwent short infusion (2.3 h), conventional infusion #2 (3.5 h), and conventional infusion #1, respectively. Patients with IRRs in the first cycle received a second rituximab cycle with the same schedule as that in the first cycle. The procedure for the third cycle was at the attending physician’s discretion. Results Among 81 B-NHL patients, the incidences of IRRs in the low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups were 31%, 20%, and 57%, respectively, without any grade ≥ 3 IRRs. The overall conversion rate to short infusion in the third cycle was 54%, without any IRRs. Conclusion Our step-by-step protocol provided safe and comfortable rituximab administration for both patients and practitioners (UMIN-CTR; UMIN000032309, registered on 19th April 2018).

In the original article [...]

Simple Summary CAR T-cell therapies have undoubtedly revolutionized the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. These therapies represent a valuable new treatment option, yielding impressive complete remission rates and improving survival. The aim of this article is to give an overview of emerging real-world evidence since data from every-day clinical practice are still scarce. We report effectiveness and safety data on 30 patients treated at our Institution. Treatment in this setting with CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapies for relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma showed a manageable safety profile and high objective response rate, confirming the encouraging results of the pivotal clinical trials. Abstract Large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL) are the most common types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Although outcomes have improved thanks to the introduction of rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy, certain LBCL still represents a challenge because of initial resistance to therapy or recurrent relapses. Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are second-generation autologous CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies approved for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) LBCL, based on the results of phase II pivotal single-arm trials ZUMA-1 (for axi-cel) and JULIET (for tisa-cel). Here, we report patients outcomes with axi-cel and tisa-cel in the standard of care (SoC) setting for R/R LBCL, treated at our Institution. Data were collected from patients who underwent leukapheresis between August 2019 and February 2021. Toxicities were graded and managed according to the institution’s guidelines. Responses were assessed as per Lugano 2014 classification. Of the 30 patients who underwent leukapheresis, 18 (60%) received axi-cel, while 12 (40%) tisa-cel. Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 10% and 16% patients, respectively. Best objective and complete response rates were 73.3% and 40%, respectively. Treatment in SoC setting with CD19 CAR T-cell therapies for R/R LBCL showed a manageable safety profile and high objective response rate.

Survival disparities by locus of care (LOC; paediatric versus adult) among adolescents and young adults (AYA) with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) are well documented. Whether similar disparities exist among AYA with aggressive mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) is unknown. We identified all Ontario, Canada AYA aged 15-21 years at diagnosis of B-NHL between 1992 and 2012. Demographic, disease, treatment and outcome data were chart abstracted. The impact of LOC on event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined, adjusted for patient and disease covariates. Among 176 AYA with B-NHL, 62 (35·2%) received therapy at paediatric centres. The 5-year EFS and OS [± standard error (SE)] for the overall cohort were 72·2 [3·4]% and 76·1 [3·2]% respectively. Both EFS and OS were superior among paediatric centre AYA [EFS (± SE) 82·2 (4·9)% vs. 66·7 (4·4)%, P = 0·02; OS 85·5 (4·5)% vs. 71·1 (4·3)%, P = 0·03]. Adjusted for histology, stage and time period, adult centre AYA had inferior EFS [hazard ratio (HR) 2·4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·1-4·9, P = 0·02] and OS (HR 2·5, 95% CI 1·1-5·7, P = 0·03). Sensitivity analyses restricted to the latest time period, when most adult centre AYA received rituximab, demonstrated similar disparities. Similar to AYA with ALL, AYA with B-NHL may benefit from being treated with paediatric protocols. Studies prospectively validating these results are warranted.

B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) is a group of heterogeneous disease which remains incurable despite developments of standard chemotherapy regimens and new therapeutic agents in decades. Some individuals could have promising response to standard therapy while others are unresponsive to standard chemotherapy or relapse after autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (ASCT), which indicates the necessity to develop novel therapies for refractory or relapsed B-NHLs. In recent years, a novel cell therapy, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T), was invented to overcome the limitation of traditional treatments. Patients with aggressive B-NHL are considered for CAR-T cell therapy when they have progressive lymphoma after second-line chemotherapy, relapse after ASCT, or require a third-line therapy. Clinical trials of anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy have manifested encouraging efficacy in refractory or relapsed B-NHL. However, adverse effects of this cellular therapy including cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, tumor lysis syndrome and on-target, off-tumor toxicities should attract our enough attention despite the great anti-tumor effects of CAR-T cell therapy. Although CAR-T cell therapy has shown remarkable results in patients with B-NHL, the outcomes of patients with B-NHL were inferior to patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The inferior response rate may be associated with physical barrier of lymphoma, tumor microenvironment and low quality of CAR-T cells manufactured from B-NHL patients. Besides, some patients relapsed after anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy, which possibly were due to limited CAR-T cells persistence, CD19 antigen escape or antigen down-regulation. Quite a few new antigen-targeted CAR-T products and new-generation CAR-T, for example, CD20-targeted CAR-T, CD79b-targeted CAR-T, CD37-targeted CAR-T, multi-antigen-targeted CAR-T, armored CAR-T and four-generation CAR-T are developing rapidly to figure out these deficiencies.

Background Patients (pts) with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) progressing after anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy have poor prognosis and may benefit from new therapy options through clinical trials. However, in a single center report, only 12% of such pts were treated in trials (Chow et al. Am J Hematol, 2019). Identifying the reasons for this low enrollment is needed to design future studies for this population. Here, we evaluated the eligibility criteria for recent landmark trials for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell NHL to learn what eligibility barriers are present. Methods Pts with aggressive B-cell NHL who received FDA-approved CART cell therapy at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Arizona, Florida) since 2018 and progressed after CART cell therapy were identified. The potential eligibility for the following key trials was evaluated: a) polatuzumab + bendamustine + rituximab, b) tafasitamab + lenalidomide, c) selinexor and d) loncastuximab. The eligibility for each trial was retrospectively assessed at the time of disease progression after CART cell therapy based on hemoglobin (Hb), absolute neutrophils count (ANC), platelet count (Plt), renal and liver function tests, ECOG performance status (PS), and central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Results Seventy-five pts had disease progression to axicabtagene ciloleucel (N=73, 97%) or tisagenlecleucel (N=2, 3%) and are included in this analysis. Median time to progression after CART was 2.1 months (IQR: 1.0 - 3.1). Thirteen (17%) pts were treated in clinical trials after progression following CART cell therapy, while 46 (61%) were treated off trials, and 16 (22%) pts never received any treatment after progression. At a median follow-up of 13.6 months (IQR: 9.1 - 26.7) from CART progression, the median overall survival (mOS) from CART progression was 5.8 months (95% CI 3.5 - 10.1) and 53 (71%) pts died. Thirty-eight pts (51%) did not meet eligibility criteria for any of the 4 recent landmark trials. Hematologic impairment was the most common barrier to inclusion of these patients in clinical trials: Hb < 9 g/dL n=23 (31%) or Hb < 10 g/dL n=36 (48%), ANC < 1.0 x 10 9/L n=19 (25%) or ANC < 1.5 x 10 9/L n=32 (43%), and Plt < 75 x 10 9/L n=30 (40%) or Plt < 90 x 10 9/L n=34 (45%). Renal (n=11, 15%) or liver dysfunction (n=5, 7%), CNS involvement (n=8, 11%) and ECOG PS > 2 (n=3, 4%) were less common reasons leading to exclusion from trials. Post CART trial ineligible pts had significantly shorter time to progression (median 1.7 months, IQR: 1.0 - 2.6 vs. 3.0 months IQR: 1.9 - 3.4, p < 0.01) and inferior overall response to CART (45% vs 67%, p = 0.06) compared to pts who met trial eligibility post CART. Baseline Hb (median Hb 9.5 g/dL, IQR: 8.5 - 10.5 vs. 10.9 g/dL, IQR: 9.7 - 12.2, p < 0.01) and Plt (median Plt 106 x 10 9/L IQR: 54 - 165 vs. 201 x 10 9/L IQR: 141 - 243, p < 0.01) were also significantly lower in pts ineligible for trials post CART. There were no significant differences between pts eligible or ineligible for trials with regards to age (median 59 vs. 60 years), number of prior therapies (median 3 vs. 3), prior autologous stem cell transplant (41% vs. 37%), bridging therapy (65% vs. 63%), baseline ANC (median 4,1 vs. 3,0 x10 9/L), or high-grade (grade ≥ 2) cytokine release syndrome (19% vs. 21%) or neurotoxicity (32%, vs. 42%), respectively. Survival after CART progression was significantly shorter (mOS 2.5 months, 95% CI: 1.6 - 5.1) for the 38 pts ineligible for trials compared to pts eligible for trials (mOS 10.6 months, 95% CI: 8.9 - NA), (p < 0.01). In the 59 pts who received therapy post CART progression, the mOS of pts treated on (n = 13) or off (n = 46) trials was 13.8 months (95% CI: 9.2 - NA) vs. 6.6 months (4.9 - 10.7), respectively (p = 0.047). Conclusion Approximately half of the pts (51%) with aggressive B-cell NHL progressing after CART cell therapy would have be excluded from landmark clinical trials. The current hematologic exclusion criteria are a major barrier to enrollment in clinical trials, which would exclude many pts who have disease progression within 3 months of CART cell therapy (ie, primary refractory disease), in whom cytopenia as a toxicity from therapy is prevalent. Given the known delayed hematologic recovery after CART cell therapy and the unmet need of pts progressing to CART cell therapy, the hematologic exclusion criteria should be adjusted to increase trial participation of this population, especially of those with primary refractory disease. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Munoz: Gilead/Kite Pharma, Kyowa, Bayer, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, Seattle Genetics, Acrotech/Aurobindo, Beigene, Verastem, AstraZeneca, Celgene/BMS, Genentech/Roche.: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Abbvie, Bayer, Gilead/Kite Pharma, Pfizer, Janssen, Juno/Celgene, BMS, Kyowa, Alexion, Beigene, Fosunkite, Innovent, Seattle Genetics, Debiopharm, Karyopharm, Genmab, ADC Therapeutics, Epizyme, Beigene, Servier: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Physicians' Education Resource: Honoraria; Targeted Oncology: Honoraria; OncView: Honoraria; Kyowa: Honoraria. Murthy: CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding. Maurer: Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Nanostring: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bennani: Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory Board; Daichii Sankyo Inc: Other: Advisory Board; Kyowa Kirin: Other: Advisory Board; Vividion: Other: Advisory Board; Kymera: Other: Advisory Board; Verastem: Other: Advisory Board. Paludo: Karyopharm: Research Funding. Wang: Genentech: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eli Lilly: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LOXO Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; InnoCare: Research Funding. Ansell: Bristol Myers Squibb, ADC Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Regeneron, Affimed, AI Therapeutics, Pfizer, Trillium and Takeda: Research Funding. Witzig: Karyopharm Therapeutics, Celgene/BMS, Incyte, Epizyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS, Acerta Pharma, Kura Oncology, Acrotech Biopharma, Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding. Nowakowski: Celgene, NanoString Technologies, MorphoSys: Research Funding; Celgene, MorphoSys, Genentech, Selvita, Debiopharm Group, Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lin: Vineti: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Sorrento: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding.

F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is now an integral part of lymphoma staging and management. Because of its greater accuracy compared with CT alone, PET/CT is currently routinely performed for staging and for response assessment at the end of treatment in the vast majority of FDG-avid lymphomas and is the cornerstone of response classification for these lymphomas according to the Lugano classification. Interim PET/CT, typically performed after 2 to 4 of 6 to 8 chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy cycles with or without radiation, is commonly performed for prognostication and potential treatment escalation or de-escalation early in the course of therapy, a concept known as response-adapted or risk-adapted treatment. Quantitative PET is an area of growing interest. Metrics, such as the standardized uptake value, changes (Delta) in the standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis, are being investigated as more reproducible and potentially more accurate predictors of response and prognosis. Despite the progress made in standardizing the use of PET/CT in lymphoma, challenges remain, particularly with respect to its limited positive predictive value, emphasizing the need for more specific molecular probes. This review highlights the most relevant applications of PET/CT in Hodgkin and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, its strengths and limitations, as well as recent efforts at implementing PET/CT-based metrics as promising tools for precision medicine.

7518 Background: Epcoritamab is a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody that induces T-cell–mediated killing of CD20–positive malignant B-cells. We present updated data, including progression-free survival (PFS) from the dose escalation part of the first-in-human phase 1/2 study of epcoritamab in pts with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL; NCT03625037). Methods: Adults with R/R CD20+ B-NHL received flat-dose 1 mL SC epcoritamab (step-up dosing approach) in 28-day cycles (q1w: cycles 1–2; q2w: cycles 3–6; q4w thereafter) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Step-up dosing and standard prophylaxis were used to mitigate severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Results: At data cut off (1/31/2021), 68 pts with B-NHL were enrolled across histologies including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n = 46 [67.6%]; de novo and transformed), follicular lymphoma (FL; 12 [17.6%]), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; 4 [5.9%]), and others (6 [8.8%]). Majority were heavily pretreated (median [range] prior lines: DLBCL, 3 [1–6]; FL, 4.5 [1–18]); including prior CAR-T (n = 6) and prior ASCT (n = 10). At median follow-up of 14.1 mo (DLBCL, 10.2 mo; FL, 15.2 mo), treatment was ongoing in 15 (22%) pts. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were pyrexia (69%), CRS (59%), and injection site reaction (47%). CRS events were all grade 1 or 2 and most occurred in cycle 1; neurotoxicity was limited (6%; grade 1: 3%; grade 3: 3%; all transient). One case of tumor lysis syndrome was observed (1.5%; grade 3); there were no cases of febrile neutropenia or treatment-related death. Overall response is shown for DLBCL ≥12 mg and ≥48 mg and FL ≥12 mg, corresponding to the minimal efficacy threshold (Table). Responses deepened over time (PR converted to CR: DLBCL, 6 pts; FL, 3 pts). Median time to response was 1.4 mo (DLBCL) and 1.9 mo (FL). Among DLBCL pts achieving CR with ≥6 mg (n = 11), none relapsed while on treatment. The median PFS for pts with DLBCL ≥12 mg (n = 22) was 9.1 mo (95% CI: 1.6, NE; median follow-up 9.3 mo) and for pts with DLBCL ≥48 mg (n = 11) median PFS was not reached (median follow-up 8.8 mo). Updated analyses will be presented. Conclusions: With longer follow-up, SC epcoritamab demonstrated substantial single-agent activity, inducing deep and durable clinically meaningful responses, with a consistent safety profile. Notably no severe (grade ≥3) CRS events, no febrile neutropenia, and limited neurotoxicity was observed. Clinical trial information: NCT03625037. [Table: see text]

In recent years, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has shown great promise in treating hematological malignancies. However, CAR T cell therapy currently has several limitations. Here we successfully developed a two-in-one approach to generate non-viral genome specific targeted CAR T cells through CRISPR/Cas9. Based on the optimized protocol, the feasibility was preliminarily demonstrated by a preclinical study inserting an anti-CD19 CAR cassette into the AAVS1 safe harbor locus. We found that non-viral AAVS1-knockin CAR T cells behave comparably to those conventionally produced by lentivirus. Furthermore, an innovative type of anti-CD19 CAR T cells with PD1-integration was constructed and shows a superior ability to eradicate tumor cells with high PD-L1 expression. In adoptive therapy for relapsed/refractory (r/r) aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), we observed a high rate (87.5%) of complete remission (CR) and durable responses without serious adverse events in eight patients after treatment. Notably, these enhanced CAR T cells were effective even at a low infusion dose and with a low CAR percentage, which indicated that they have higher potency. No off-target events were found in the infusion product. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis further validated the advantage of PD1 interference that results in fewer dysfunctional CAR T cells through this treatment. Collectively, our results demonstrate the outstanding safety and efficacy of non-viral genome specific integrated CAR T cells, thus providing a revolutionary technology for CAR T cell therapy.

Simple Summary Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells have become clinical practice for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess infection complications after lymphodepletion and CAR-T cell therapy. Infections were commonly detected, but manageable in most cases. Fast and appropriate identification as well as treatment were critical, especially in this very vulnerable patient group. Effective strategies to prevent infections as well as adequate medical management also include standardized prophylaxis and additional supportive therapy. Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has proven to be very effective in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). However, infections—related either due to lymphodepletion or the CAR-T cell therapy itself—can result in severe and potentially life-threatening complications, while side effects such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) might complicate differential diagnosis. Sixty-seven dosings of CAR-T cells in sixty adult patients with NHL (85%) and ALL (15%) receiving CAR-T cell therapy were assessed for infectious complications. Almost two-thirds of patients (61%) developed fever following lymphodepletion and CAR-T cell dosing. Microbiological or radiological findings were observed in 25% of all cases (bacterial 12%, viral 5%, fungal 8%). Inpatient infections were associated with more lines of therapy and more severe CRS. However, overall serious complications were rare after CAR-T therapy, with one patient dying of infection. Pathogen detection after inpatient stay was infrequent and mostly occurred in the first 90 days after dosing. Infections in CAR-T cell treated patents are common. Fast and suitable identification and treatment are crucial in these heavily pretreated and immunocompromised patients. In most cases infectious complications are manageable. Nonetheless, standardized anti-infective prophylaxis and supportive therapy are mandatory to reduce morbidity and mortality in CAR-T cell therapy.