1. Paradoxical increase in ambulatory SBP in coarctation of aorta a compared to essential hypertension
- Author
-
Likhita Shaik, Heidi M. Connolly, William R. Miranda, Renuka Reddy Katta, Ahmed Goda Sakr, Janaki Devara, and Alexander C. Egbe
- Subjects
Advanced and Specialized Nursing ,medicine.medical_specialty ,education.field_of_study ,Ambulatory blood pressure ,business.industry ,Population ,General Medicine ,Stroke volume ,Assessment and Diagnosis ,Essential hypertension ,medicine.disease ,Masked Hypertension ,Blood pressure ,Afterload ,Internal medicine ,Ambulatory ,Internal Medicine ,medicine ,Cardiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,education ,business - Abstract
BACKGROUND The relationship between office vs. ambulatory blood pressure (BP) indices are well-studied in patients with essential hypertension and based on these data, it is known that the average 24-h ambulatory BP is typically lower than office BP. However, emerging data show that office SBP underestimates arterial afterload in patients with coarctation of aorta (COA), and a minimal increase in stroke volume during low-intensity exercise results in an exaggerated rise in SBP as compared to those with essential hypertension. We hypothesized that COA patients will have higher ambulatory SBP and a higher prevalence of masked hypertension compared to patients with essential hypertension. METHODS Case-control study of 118 COA patients and 118 patients with essential hypertension matched by age, sex, BMI and office SBP. RESULTS Although both groups had similar office SBP (132 ± 17 mmHg) by design, the COA group had paradoxical increases in 24-h ambulatory SBP (135 ± 14 vs. 126 ± 13; P
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF