Search

Introduction Capmatinib is approved for MET exon 14–altered NSCLC on the basis of activity in targeted therapy–naive patients. We conducted a phase 2 study to assess the efficacy of capmatinib in patients previously treated with a MET inhibitor. Methods Patients with advanced NSCLC harboring MET amplification or MET exon 14 skipping alterations received capmatinib 400 mg twice daily. The primary end point was the objective response rate. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, disease control rate (DCR), intracranial response rate, and overall survival. Circulating tumor DNA was analyzed to identify capmatinib resistance mechanisms. Results A total of 20 patients were enrolled between May 2016 and November 2019, including 15 patients with MET skipping alterations and five patients with MET amplification. All patients had received crizotinib; three had also received other MET-directed therapies. The median interval between crizotinib and capmatinib was 22 days (range: 4–374). Two patients (10%) achieved an objective response to capmatinib and 14 had stable disease, yielding a DCR of 80%. Among five patients who discontinued crizotinib for intolerance, the DCR was 83%, including two patients with the best tumor shrinkage of −25% and −28%. Intracranial DCR among four patients with measurable brain metastases was 100%, with no observed intracranial objective responses. Overall, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.5 (95% confidence interval: 1.3–11.0) and 11.3 (95% confidence interval: 5.5–not reached) months, respectively. MET D1228 and Y1230 mutations and MAPK alterations were recurrently detected in postcrizotinib, precapmatinib plasma. New and persistent MET mutations and MAPK pathway alterations were detected in plasma at progression on capmatinib. Conclusions Capmatinib has modest activity in crizotinib-pretreated MET-altered NSCLC, potentially owing to overlapping resistance mechanisms.

Purpose: Current standard initial therapy for advanced, ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase fusion (ROS1)-positive (ROS1+) non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crizotinib or entrectinib. Lorlatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase/ROS1 inhibitor, recently demonstrated efficacy in ROS1+ NSCLC, including in crizotinib-pretreated patients. However, mechanisms of lorlatinib resistance in ROS1+ disease remain poorly understood. Here, we assessed mechanisms of resistance to crizotinib and lorlatinib. Experimental Design: Biopsies from patients with ROS1+ NSCLC progressing on crizotinib or lorlatinib were profiled by genetic sequencing. Results: From 55 patients, 47 post-crizotinib and 32 post-lorlatinib biopsies were assessed. Among 42 post-crizotinib and 28 post-lorlatinib biopsies analyzed at distinct timepoints, ROS1 mutations were identified in 38% and 46%, respectively. ROS1 G2032R was the most commonly occurring mutation in approximately one third of cases. Additional ROS1 mutations included D2033N (2.4%) and S1986F (2.4%) post-crizotinib and L2086F (3.6%), G2032R/L2086F (3.6%), G2032R/S1986F/L2086F (3.6%), and S1986F/L2000V (3.6%) post-lorlatinib. Structural modeling predicted ROS1L2086F causes steric interference to lorlatinib, crizotinib, and entrectinib, while it may accommodate cabozantinib. In Ba/F3 models, ROS1L2086F, ROS1G2032R/L2086F, and ROS1S1986F/G2032R/L2086F were refractory to lorlatinib but sensitive to cabozantinib. A patient with disease progression on crizotinib and lorlatinib and ROS1 L2086F received cabozantinib for nearly 11 months with disease control. Among lorlatinib-resistant biopsies, we also identified MET amplification (4%), KRAS G12C (4%), KRAS amplification (4%), NRAS mutation (4%), and MAP2K1 mutation (4%). Conclusions: ROS1 mutations mediate resistance to crizotinib and lorlatinib in more than one third of cases, underscoring the importance of developing next-generation ROS1 inhibitors with potency against these mutations, including G2032R and L2086F. Continued efforts are needed to elucidate ROS1-independent resistance mechanisms.

Purpose: Most ALK-positive lung cancers will develop ALK-independent resistance after treatment with next-generation ALK inhibitors. MET amplification has been described in patients progressing on ALK inhibitors, but frequency of this event has not been comprehensively assessed. Experimental Design: We performed FISH and/or next-generation sequencing on 207 posttreatment tissue (n = 101) or plasma (n = 106) specimens from patients with ALK-positive lung cancer to detect MET genetic alterations. We evaluated ALK inhibitor sensitivity in cell lines with MET alterations and assessed antitumor activity of ALK/MET blockade in ALK-positive cell lines and 2 patients with MET-driven resistance. Results: MET amplification was detected in 15% of tumor biopsies from patients relapsing on next-generation ALK inhibitors, including 12% and 22% of biopsies from patients progressing on second-generation inhibitors or lorlatinib, respectively. Patients treated with a second-generation ALK inhibitor in the first-line setting were more likely to develop MET amplification than those who had received next-generation ALK inhibitors after crizotinib (P = 0.019). Two tumor specimens harbored an identical ST7-MET rearrangement, one of which had concurrent MET amplification. Expressing ST7-MET in the sensitive H3122 ALK-positive cell line induced resistance to ALK inhibitors that was reversed with dual ALK/MET inhibition. MET inhibition resensitized a patient-derived cell line harboring both ST7-MET and MET amplification to ALK inhibitors. Two patients with ALK-positive lung cancer and acquired MET alterations achieved rapid responses to ALK/MET combination therapy. Conclusions: Treatment with next-generation ALK inhibitors, particularly in the first-line setting, may lead to MET-driven resistance. Patients with acquired MET alterations may derive clinical benefit from therapies that target both ALK and MET.

Purpose: Acquired resistance to next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is often driven by secondary ALK mutations. Here, we investigated utility of plasma genotyping for identifying ALK resistance mutations at relapse on next-generation ALK TKIs. Experimental Design: We analyzed 106 plasma specimens from 84 patients with advanced ALK-positive lung cancer treated with second- and third-generation ALK TKIs using a commercially available next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform (Guardant360). Tumor biopsies from TKI-resistant lesions underwent targeted NGS to identify ALK mutations. Results: By genotyping plasma, we detected an ALK mutation in 46 (66%) of 70 patients relapsing on a second-generation ALK TKI. When post-alectinib plasma and tumor specimens were compared, there was no difference in frequency of ALK mutations (67% vs. 63%), but plasma specimens were more likely to harbor ≥2 ALK mutations (24% vs. 2%, P = 0.004). Among 29 patients relapsing on lorlatinib, plasma genotyping detected an ALK mutation in 22 (76%), including 14 (48%) with ≥2 ALK mutations. The most frequent combinations of ALK mutations were G1202R/L1196M and D1203N/1171N. Detection of ≥2 ALK mutations was significantly more common in patients relapsing on lorlatinib compared with second-generation ALK TKIs (48% vs. 23%, P = 0.017). Among 15 patients who received lorlatinib after a second-generation TKI, serial plasma analysis demonstrated that eight (53%) acquired ≥1 new ALK mutations on lorlatinib. Conclusions: ALK resistance mutations increase with each successive generation of ALK TKI and may be underestimated by tumor genotyping. Sequential treatment with increasingly potent ALK TKIs may promote acquisition of ALK resistance mutations leading to treatment-refractory compound ALK mutations.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy in which inhibitors of PARP have modest single-agent activity. We performed a phase I/II trial of combination olaparib tablets and temozolomide (OT) in patients with previously treated SCLC. We established a recommended phase II dose of olaparib 200 mg orally twice daily with temozolomide 75 mg/m2 daily, both on days 1 to 7 of a 21-day cycle, and expanded to a total of 50 patients. The confirmed overall response rate was 41.7% (20/48 evaluable); median progression-free survival was 4.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8–5.7]; and median overall survival was 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.1–11.3). Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) from trial patients recapitulated clinical OT responses, enabling a 32-PDX coclinical trial. This revealed a correlation between low basal expression of inflammatory-response genes and cross-resistance to both OT and standard first-line chemotherapy (etoposide/platinum). These results demonstrate a promising new therapeutic strategy in SCLC and uncover a molecular signature of those tumors most likely to respond. Significance: We demonstrate substantial clinical activity of combination olaparib/temozolomide in relapsed SCLC, revealing a promising new therapeutic strategy for this highly recalcitrant malignancy. Through an integrated coclinical trial in PDXs, we then identify a molecular signature predictive of response to OT, and describe the common molecular features of cross-resistant SCLC. See related commentary by Pacheco and Byers, p. 1340. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1325

Despite the clinical success of the third-generation EGFR inhibitor osimertinib as a first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), resistance arises due to the acquisition of EGFR second-site mutations and other mechanisms, which necessitates alternative therapies. Dacomitinib, a pan-HER inhibitor, is approved for first-line treatment and results in different acquired EGFR mutations than osimertinib that mediate on-target resistance. A combination of osimertinib and dacomitinib could therefore induce more durable responses by preventing the emergence of resistance. Here we present an integrated computational modeling and experimental approach to identify an optimal dosing schedule for osimertinib and dacomitinib combination therapy. We developed a predictive model that encompasses tumor heterogeneity and inter-subject pharmacokinetic variability to predict tumor evolution under different dosing schedules, parameterized using in vitro dose-response data. This model was validated using cell line data and used to identify an optimal combination dosing schedule. Our schedule was subsequently confirmed tolerable in an ongoing dose-escalation phase I clinical trial (NCT03810807), with some dose modifications, demonstrating that our rational modeling approach can be used to identify appropriate dosing for combination therapy in the clinical setting., Osimertinib and dacomitinib are approved as first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC but resistance can arise. Here, the authors use a computational model to identify an optimal dosing schedule for osimertinib and dacomitinib combination therapy that was confirmed tolerable and effective in an ongoing phase I clinical trial.

Comprehensive genetic profiling using next-generation sequencing technologies has become an integral part of precision oncology. Variant annotation requires translating the DNA findings into protein level predictions. In this article we highlight inconsistencies in variant annotation for the MET D1228N exon 19 resistance mutations. MET D1228N and D1246N represent the same resistance mutation in MET exon 14 skipping alterations annotated on different transcripts. Additional examples of relevant variants annotated on different transcripts emphasize the importance of avoiding erroneous interpretation when realizing precision oncology.

Simple Summary Acquired resistance to molecularly targeted therapies remains a major challenge in the treatment of cancer. It has been hypothesized that drug-tolerant (or “persister”) cells without bona fide resistance mechanisms may survive initial drug treatment and undergo further evolution over time to acquire resistance mechanisms leading to cancer relapse. In this review, we will discuss insights into mechanisms and vulnerabilities of these cells revealed by recent in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies. Abstract Drug resistance is perhaps the greatest challenge in improving outcomes for cancer patients undergoing treatment with targeted therapies. It is becoming clear that “persisters,” a subpopulation of drug-tolerant cells found in cancer populations, play a critical role in the development of drug resistance. Persisters are able to maintain viability under therapy but are typically slow cycling or dormant. These cells do not harbor classic drug resistance driver alterations, and their partial resistance phenotype is transient and reversible upon removal of the drug. In the clinic, the persister state most closely corresponds to minimal residual disease from which relapse can occur if treatment is discontinued or if acquired drug resistance develops in response to continuous therapy. Thus, eliminating persister cells will be crucial to improve outcomes for cancer patients. Using lung cancer targeted therapies as a primary paradigm, this review will give an overview of the characteristics of drug-tolerant persister cells, mechanisms associated with drug tolerance, and potential therapeutic opportunities to target this persister cell population in tumors.

Acquired drug resistance to even the most effective anti-cancer targeted therapies remains an unsolved clinical problem. Although many drivers of acquired drug resistance have been identified1‒6, the underlying molecular mechanisms shaping tumor evolution during treatment are incompletely understood. The extent to which therapy actively drives tumor evolution by promoting mutagenic processes7 or simply provides the selective pressure necessary for the outgrowth of drug-resistant clones8 remains an open question. Here, we report that lung cancer targeted therapies commonly used in the clinic induce the expression of cytidine deaminase APOBEC3A (A3A), leading to sustained mutagenesis in drug-tolerant cancer cells persisting during therapy. Induction of A3A facilitated the formation of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) in cycling drug-treated cells, and fully resistant clones that evolved from drug-tolerant intermediates exhibited an elevated burden of chromosomal aberrations such as copy number alterations and structural variations. Preventing therapy-induced A3A mutagenesis either by gene deletion or RNAi-mediated suppression delayed the emergence of drug resistance. Finally, we observed accumulation of A3A mutations in lung cancer patients who developed drug resistance after treatment with sequential targeted therapies. These data suggest that induction of A3A mutagenesis in response to targeted therapy treatment may facilitate the development of acquired resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer. Thus, suppressing expression or enzymatic activity of A3A may represent a potential therapeutic strategy to prevent or delay acquired resistance to lung cancer targeted therapy.

The development of molecular targeted drugs with radiation and chemotherapy is critically important for improving the outcomes of patients with hard-to-treat, potentially curable cancers. However, too many preclinical studies have not translated into successful radiation oncology trials. Major contributing factors to this insufficiency include poor reproducibility of preclinical data, inadequate preclinical modeling of intertumoral genomic heterogeneity that influences treatment sensitivity in the clinic, and a reliance on tumor growth delay instead of local control (TCD50) endpoints. There exists an urgent need to overcome these barriers to facilitate successful clinical translation of targeted radiosensitizers. To this end, we have used 3-dimensional (3D) cell culture assays to better model tumor behavior in vivo. Examples of successful prediction of in vivo effects with these 3D assays include radiosensitization of head and neck cancers by inhibiting epidermal growth factor receptor or focal adhesion kinase signaling, and radioresistance associated with oncogenic mutation of KRAS. To address the issue of tumor heterogeneity, we leveraged institutional resources that allow high-throughput 3D screening of radiation combinations with small-molecule inhibitors across genomically characterized cell lines from lung, head and neck, and pancreatic cancers. This high-throughput screen is expected to uncover genomic biomarkers that will inform the successful clinical translation of targeted agents from the National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program portfolio and other sources. Screening "hits" need to be subjected to refinement studies that include clonogenic assays, addition of disease-specific chemotherapeutics, target/biomarker validation, and integration of patient-derived tumor models. The chemoradiosensitizing activities of the most promising drugs should be confirmed in TCD50 assays in xenograft models with or without relevant biomarker and using clinically relevant radiation fractionation. We predict that appropriately validated and biomarker-directed targeted therapies will have a higher likelihood than past efforts of being successfully incorporated into the standard management of hard-to-treat tumors.

BACKGROUND: Rearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusions are a validated target in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RET-selective inhibitors selpercatinib (LOXO-292) and pralsetinib (BLU-667) recently demonstrated favorable antitumor activity and safety profiles in advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC, and both have received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration for this indication. Insights into mechanisms of resistance to selective RET inhibitors remain limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was performed at five institutions. Tissue and/or cell-free DNA was obtained from patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC after treatment with selpercatinib or pralsetinib and assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) or MET fluorescence in situ hybridization. RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 23 post-treatment tissue and/or plasma biopsies from 18 RET fusion-positive patients who received a RET-selective inhibitor (selpercatinib, n=10; pralsetinib, n=7; pralsetinib followed by selpercatinib, n=1 with biopsy after each inhibitor). Three cases had paired tissue and plasma samples, of which one also had two serial resistant tissue specimens. The median progression-free survival on RET inhibitors was 6.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.6–10.8 months]. Acquired RET mutations were identified in two cases (10%), both affecting the RET G810 residue in the kinase solvent front. Three resistant cases (15%) harbored acquired MET amplification without concurrent RET resistance mutations, and one specimen had acquired KRAS amplification. No other canonical driver alterations were identified by NGS. Among 16 resistant tumor specimens, none had evidence of squamous or small cell histologic transformation. CONCLUSIONS: RET solvent front mutations are a recurrent mechanism of RET inhibitor resistance, although they occurred at a relatively low frequency. The majority of resistance to selective RET inhibition may be driven by RET-independent resistance such as acquired MET or KRAS amplification. Next-generation RET inhibitors with potency against RET resistance mutations and combination strategies are needed to effectively overcome resistance in these patients.

While significant advancements have been made in the available therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), acquired resistance remains a major barrier to treatment. We have not yet achieved the ability to cure advanced NSCLC with systemic therapy, despite our growing understanding of many of the oncogenic drivers of this disease. Rather, the emergence of drug-tolerant and drug-resistant cells remains the rule, even in the face of increasingly potent targeted therapies. In this review, we provide a broad overview of the mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapy that have been demonstrated across molecular subtypes of NSCLC, highlighting the dynamic interplay between driver oncogene, bypass signaling pathways, shifting cellular phenotypes, and surrounding tumor microenvironment.

PURPOSE: Patterns of resistance to first-line osimertinib are not well-established and have primarily been evaluated using plasma assays which cannot detect histologic transformation and have differential sensitivity for copy number changes and chromosomal rearrangements. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To characterize mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib, patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung cancers who received osimertinib at Memorial Sloan Kettering and had next-generation sequencing performed on tumor tissue before osimertinib initiation and after progression were identified. RESULTS: Among 62 patients who met eligibility critieria, histologic transformation, primarily squamous transformation, was identified in 15% of first-line osimertinib cases and 14% of later-line cases. Nineteen percent (5/27) of patients treated with first-line osimertinib had off-target genetic resistance (2 MET amplification, 1 KRAS mutation, 1 RET fusion, and 1 BRAF fusion) whereas 4% (1/27) had an acquired EGFR mutation (EGFR G724S). Patients with squamous transformation exhibited considerable genomic complexity; acquired PIK3CA mutation, chromosome 3q amplification and FGF amplification were all seen. Patients with transformation had shorter time on osimertinib and shorter survival compared to patients with on-target resistance. Initial EGFR sensitizing mutation, time on osimertinib treatment and line of therapy also influenced resistance mechanism that emerged. The compound mutation EGFR S768 + V769L and the mutation MET H1094Y were identified and validated as resistance mechanisms with potential treatment options. CONCLUSION: Histologic transformation and other off-target molecular alterations are frequent early emerging resistance mechanisms to osimertinib and are associated with poor clinical outcomes.

Summary: Hallin and colleagues demonstrate the preclinical activity of the KRASG12C-specific inhibitor MRTX849 in a series of in vitro and in vivo studies with supporting pilot clinical efficacy. Variable responsiveness despite effective KRASG12C inhibition highlights both the promise and potential need for combinatorial strategies to optimally target KRASG12C-driven cancers. See related article by Hallin et al., p. 54.

We present a cohort of 41 patients with osimertinib resistance biopsies, including 2 with an acquired CCDC6–RET fusion. Although RET fusions have been identified in resistant EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), their role in acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors is not well described. To assess the biological implications of RET fusions in an EGFR-mutant cancer, we expressed CCDC6–RET in PC9 (EGFR del19) and MGH134 (EGFR L858R/T790M) cells and found that CCDC6–RET was sufficient to confer resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). The selective RET inhibitors BLU-667 and cabozantinib resensitized CCDC6–RET-expressing cells to EGFR inhibition. Finally, we treated 2 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and RET-mediated resistance with osimertinib and BLU-667. The combination was well tolerated and led to rapid radiographic response in both patients. This study provides proof of concept that RET fusions can mediate acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs and that combined EGFR and RET inhibition with osimertinib/BLU-667 may be a well-tolerated and effective treatment strategy for such patients. Significance: The role of RET fusions in resistant EGFR-mutant cancers is unknown. We report that RET fusions mediate resistance to EGFR inhibitors and demonstrate that this bypass track can be effectively targeted with a selective RET inhibitor (BLU-667) in the clinic. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1494

Purpose: EGFR inhibitors (EGFRi) are effective against EGFR-mutant lung cancers. The efficacy of these drugs, however, is mitigated by the outgrowth of resistant cells, most often driven by a secondary acquired mutation in EGFR, T790M. We recently demonstrated that T790M can arise de novo during treatment; it follows that one potential therapeutic strategy to thwart resistance would be identifying and eliminating these cells [referred to as drug-tolerant cells (DTC)] prior to acquiring secondary mutations like T790M. Experimental Design: We have developed DTCs to EGFRi in EGFR-mutant lung cancer cell lines. Subsequent analyses of DTCs included RNA-seq, high-content microscopy, and protein translational assays. Based on these results, we tested the ability of MCL-1 BH3 mimetics to combine with EGFR inhibitors to eliminate DTCs and shrink EGFR-mutant lung cancer tumors in vivo. Results: We demonstrate surviving EGFR-mutant lung cancer cells upregulate the antiapoptotic protein MCL-1 in response to short-term EGFRi treatment. Mechanistically, DTCs undergo a protein biosynthesis enrichment resulting in increased mTORC1-mediated mRNA translation of MCL-1, revealing a novel mechanism in which lung cancer cells adapt to short-term pressures of apoptosis-inducing kinase inhibitors. Moreover, MCL-1 is a key molecule governing the emergence of early EGFR-mutant DTCs to EGFRi, and we demonstrate it can be effectively cotargeted with clinically emerging MCL-1 inhibitors both in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions: Altogether, these data reveal that this novel therapeutic combination may delay the acquisition of secondary mutations, therefore prolonging therapy efficacy. Clin Cancer Res; 24(22); 5658–72. ©2018 AACR.

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are highly heterogeneous. With the lack of a comprehensive understanding of CAFs' functional distinctions, it remains unclear how cancer treatments could be personalized based on CAFs in a patient's tumor. We have established a living biobank of CAFs derived from biopsies of patients' non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) that encompasses a broad molecular spectrum of CAFs in clinical NSCLC. By functionally interrogating CAF heterogeneity using the same therapeutics received by patients, we identify three functional subtypes: (1) robustly protective of cancers and highly expressing HGF and FGF7; (2) moderately protective of cancers and highly expressing FGF7; and (3) those providing minimal protection. These functional differences among CAFs are governed by their intrinsic TGF-β signaling, which suppresses HGF and FGF7 expression. This CAF functional classification correlates with patients' clinical response to targeted therapies and also associates with the tumor immune microenvironment, therefore providing an avenue to guide personalized treatment.

Purpose The ROS1 tyrosine kinase is activated through ROS1 gene rearrangements in 1% to 2% of non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), which confer sensitivity to treatment with the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)/ROS1/mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor inhibitor crizotinib. Currently, insights into patterns of metastatic spread and mechanisms of crizotinib resistance among patients with ROS1-positive disease are limited. Patients and Methods We reviewed clinical and radiographic imaging data of patients with ROS1- and ALK-positive NSCLC to compare patterns of metastatic spread at initial metastatic diagnosis. To determine molecular mechanisms of crizotinib resistance, we analyzed repeat biopsy specimens from a cohort of patients with ROS1-positive disease who progressed on crizotinib. Results We identified 39 and 196 patients with advanced ROS1- and ALK-positive NSCLC, respectively. Patients with ROS1-positive disease had significantly lower rates of extrathoracic metastases ( ROS1, 59.0%; ALK, 83.2%; P = .002), including lower rates of brain metastases ( ROS1, 19.4%; ALK, 39.1%; P = .033), at initial metastatic diagnosis. Despite similar overall survival between patients with ALK- and ROS1-positive NSCLC treated with crizotinib (median, 3.0 v 2.5 years, respectively; P = .786), patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC also had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of brain metastases (34% v 73% at 5 years; P < .001). In addition, we identified 16 patients who underwent a total of 17 repeat biopsies after progression on crizotinib. ROS1 resistance mutations were identified in 53% of specimens, including nine (64%) of 14 non–brain metastasis specimens. ROS1 mutations included G2032R (41%), D2033N (6%), and S1986F (6%). Conclusion Compared with ALK rearrangements, ROS1 rearrangements are associated with lower rates of extrathoracic metastases, including fewer brain metastases, at initial metastatic diagnosis. ROS1 resistance mutations, particularly G2032R, appear to be the predominant mechanism of resistance to crizotinib, which underscores the need to develop novel ROS1 inhibitors with activity against these resistant mutants.

Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) may serve as a predictive biomarker for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies; however, little is known about intertumoral heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression determined by IHC in lung adenocarcinomas (ADCs), and there have been conflicting results on the prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in ADCs.PD-L1 expression was evaluated in resected stage II and III ADCs by using various cutoffs and correlated with clinicopathologic parameters and survival. PD-L1 expression was also compared between the primary tumor and lymph node metastases.There were 109 study cases. PD-L1 expression was seen in 56 (51%), 43 (39%), and 19 (17%) when cutoffs of at least 1%, at least 5%, and at least 50%, respectively, were used. Abundant intratumoral CD8-positive T cells were a significant predictor of the expression in the primary tumor, with cutoffs of 1% and 5% (p0.001 for both) by multivariate analysis, whereas they were a nonsignificant predictor of the expression with a 50% cutoff (p = 0.076). PD-L1 expression was concordant between the primary tumor and nodal metastasis in most of the cases, but it was discrepant in up to 38%. The discrepancy was attributed in part to different predominant histologic patterns between the primary and metastatic tumors. In the entire cohort, PD-L1 expression with all cutoffs had no bearing on 5-year recurrence-free survival.PD-L1 expression is associated with abundant intratumoral CD8-positive T cells in resected ADCs, suggesting a predictive role of PD-L1 expression in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies; however, the possible intertumoral heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression raises a concern about selecting the most appropriate sample for PD-L1 IHC.

Optimal integration of molecularly targeted therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation (CRT) to improve outcomes in genotype-defined cancers remains a current challenge in clinical settings. Important questions regarding optimal scheduling and length of induction period for neoadjuvant use of targeted agents remain unsolved and vary among clinical trial protocols. Here, we develop and validate a biomathematical framework encompassing drug resistance and radiobiology to simulate patterns of local versus distant recurrences in a non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) population with mutated EGFR receiving TKIs and CRT. Our model predicted that targeted induction before CRT, an approach currently being tested in clinical trials, may render adjuvant targeted therapy less effective due to proliferation of drug-resistant cancer cells when using very long induction periods. Furthermore, simulations not only demonstrated the competing effects of drug-resistant cell expansion versus overall tumor regression as a function of induction length, but also directly estimated the probability of observing an improvement in progression-free survival at a given cohort size. We thus demonstrate that such stochastic biological simulations have the potential to quantitatively inform the design of multimodality clinical trials in genotype-defined cancers. Significance: A biomathematical framework based on fundamental principles of evolution and radiobiology for in silico clinical trial design allows clinicians to optimize administration of TKIs before chemoradiotherapy in oncogene-driven NSCLC.

ROS1 gene rearrangement was observed in around 1–2 % of NSCLC patients and in several other cancers such as cholangiocarcinoma, glioblastoma, or colorectal cancer. Crizotinib, an ALK/ROS1/MET inhibitor, is highly effective against ROS1-rearranged lung cancer and is used in clinic. However, crizotinib resistance is an emerging issue, and several resistance mechanisms, such as secondary kinase-domain mutations (e.g., ROS1-G2032R) have been identified in crizotinib-refractory patients. Here we characterize a new selective ROS1/NTRK inhibitor, DS-6051b, in preclinical models of ROS1- or NTRK-rearranged cancers. DS-6051b induces dramatic growth inhibition of both wild type and G2032R mutant ROS1–rearranged cancers or NTRK-rearranged cancers in vitro and in vivo. Here we report that DS-6051b is effective in treating ROS1- or NTRK-rearranged cancer in preclinical models, including crizotinib-resistant ROS1 positive cancer with secondary kinase domain mutations especially G2032R mutation which is highly resistant to crizotinib as well as lorlatinib and entrectinib, next generation ROS1 inhibitors., The treatment of ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer with the TKI crizotinib is limited due to the emergence of resistance. Here, the authors develop a new ROS1/NTRK inhibitor, DS-6051b, which overcomes crizotinib resistance in preclinical models.

Several cancer immunotherapy approaches, such as immune checkpoint blockade and adoptive T-cell therapy, boost T-cell activity against the tumor, but these strategies are not effective in the absence of T cells specific for displayed tumor antigens. Here we outline an immunotherapy in which endogenous T cells specific for a noncancer antigen are retargeted to attack tumors. The approach relies on the use of antibody-peptide epitope conjugates (APECs) to deliver suitable antigens to the tumor surface for presention by HLA-I. To retarget cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD8+ T cells against tumors, we used APECs containing CMV-derived epitopes conjugated to tumor-targeting antibodies via metalloprotease-sensitive linkers. These APECs redirect pre-existing CMV immunity against tumor cells in vitro and in mouse cancer models. In vitro, APECs activated specifically CMV-reactive effector T cells whereas a bispecific T-cell engager activated both effector and regulatory T cells. Our approach may provide an effective alternative in cancers that are not amenable to checkpoint inhibitors or other immunotherapies.

Acquired drug resistance to even the most effective anti cancer targeted therapies remains an unsolved clinical problem. Although many drivers of acquired drug resistance have been identified, the underlying molecular mechanisms shaping tumor evolution during treatment are incompletely understood. The extent to which therapy actively drives tumor evolution by promoting mutagenic processes or simply provides the selective pressure necessary for the outgrowth of drug resistant clones remains an open question. Here, we report that lung cancer targeted therapies commonly used in the clinic induce the expression of cytidine deaminase APOBEC3A (A3A), leading to sustained mutagenesis in drug tolerant cancer cells persisting during therapy. Induction of A3A facilitated the formation of double strand DNA breaks (DSBs) in cycling drug-treated cells, and fully resistant clones that evolved from drug tolerant intermediates exhibited an elevated burden of chromosomal aberrations such as copy number alterations and structural variations. Preventing therapy induced A3A mutagenesis either by gene deletion or RNAi mediated suppression delayed the emergence of drug resistance. Finally, we observed accumulation of A3A mutations in lung cancer patients who developed drug resistance after treatment with sequential targeted therapies. These data suggest that induction of A3A mutagenesis in response to targeted therapy treatment may facilitate the development of acquired resistance in non small cell lung cancer. Thus, suppressing expression or enzymatic activity of A3A may represent a potential therapeutic strategy to prevent or delay acquired resistance to lung cancer targeted therapy. Citation Format: Hideko Isozaki, Ammal Abbasi, Naveed Nikpour, Adam Langenbucher, Wenjia Su, Marcello Stanzione, Lecia V. Sequist, Rémi Buisson, Michael S. Lawrence, Aaron N. Hata. APOBEC3A drives acquired resistance to targeted therapies in non small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 39.

Background: There are currently no approved targeted therapies for KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), which represent 25-30% of lung adenocarcinomas. The development of mutant-specific covalent inhibitors of KRAS G12C has invigorated hope that clinically effective KRAS-targeted therapies are within reach. While these agents have shown activity in early phase clinical trials, identification of specific vulnerabilities conferred by common co-occurring mutations in KRAS-mutant NSCLC may enable development of combination therapies with enhanced activity in distinct subsets of patients. Results: We screened a panel of KRAS-mutant NSCLC cell lines and observed that loss of the tumor suppressor STK11/LKB1 is associated with increased MCL-1 dependence and sensitivity to combined MAPK (either MEK inhibitor or KRAS G12C inhibitor AMG 510) and MCL-1 inhibition (AMG 176). Restoration of LKB1 expression in LKB1-deficient cell lines and mouse xenograft tumors blunted the apoptotic response to MAPK + MCL-1 inhibition; conversely, deletion of LKB1 in LKB1 wild-type models restored the sensitivity. Mechanistically, LKB1 deficiency is associated with an altered phosphoproteome and increased MCL-1-dependent apoptotic priming. LKB1 loss increased cellular stress leading to hyperactivation of JNK1, phosphorylation and stabilization of MCL-1 protein, and increased BIM sequestration by MCL-1. Upon suppression of MAPK signaling, LKB1-deficient cells exhibited greater levels of BIM bound to MCL-1 that could be liberated by AMG 176 to induce apoptosis. Consistent with these results, ex vivo treatment of tumor tissue from a KRAS-LKB1 mutant NSCLC patient with MEK inhibitor or AMG 510 increased MCL-1 dependent priming. Conclusion: These results uncover a novel link between LKB1, cellular stress, and the regulation of MCL-1. LKB1 loss confers a dependency on MCL-1 that can be exploited therapeutically. Moreover, our study provides preclinical rationale for the exploration of combined KRAS G12C + MCL-1 inhibitors, particularly for KRAS-LKB1 mutant patients who respond poorly to standard-of-care checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Citation Format: Chendi Li, Yi Shen, Mohammed Usman Syed, Audris Oh, Cameron Fraser, Johannes Kreuzer, Kaitlyn Webster, Robert Morris, Sean Caenepeel, Anne Y. Saiki, Karen Rex, James Lipford, Wilhelm Hass, Kristopher Sarosiek, Paul E. Hughes, Aaron N. Hata. LKB1 loss rewires stress signaling-induced apoptotic protein dynamics and sensitizes KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancers to combined MAPK + MCL-1 blockade [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 982.

Targeted therapies have revolutionized treatment of several different types of cancers. However, in almost an invariable fashion, cancers eventually regrow in the presence of the targeted therapy, a phenomenon referred to as acquired resistance. In this issue of Cancer Research, Finn and colleagues demonstrate that modeling acquired resistance to MET tyrosine kinase inhibition in a MET-amplified gastric cancer cell line by a single, high exposure of the targeted therapy reveals clinically relevant acquired resistant mechanisms, which may be more faithful and comprehensive than the ones revealed through traditional ramp-up approaches. See related article by Finn et al., p. 79

The importance of preexisting versus acquired drug resistance in patients with cancer treated with small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) remains controversial. The goal of this study is to provide a general estimate of the size and dynamics of a preexisting, drug-resistant tumor cell population versus a slow-growing persister population that is the precursor of acquired TKI resistance. We describe a general model of resistance development, including persister evolution and preexisting resistance, solely based on the macroscopic trajectory of tumor burden during treatment. We applied the model to 20 tumor volume trajectories of EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients treated with the TKI erlotinib. Under the assumption of only preexisting resistant cells or only persister evolution, it is not possible to explain the observed tumor trajectories with realistic parameter values. Assuming only persister evolution would require very high mutation induction rates, while only preexisting resistance would lead to very large preexisting populations of resistant cells at the initiation of treatment. However, combining preexisting resistance with persister populations can explain the observed tumor volume trajectories and yields an estimated preexisting resistant fraction varying from 10−4 to 10−1 at the time of treatment initiation for this study cohort. Our results also demonstrate that the growth rate of the resistant population is highly correlated to the time to tumor progression. These estimates of the size of the resistant and persistent tumor cell population during TKI treatment can inform combination treatment strategies such as multi-agent schedules or a combination of targeted agents and radiotherapy. Significance: These findings quantify pre-existing resistance and persister cell populations, which are essential for the integration of targeted agents into the management of locally advanced disease and the timing of radiotherapy in metastatic patients.

Targeted therapies have changed the landscape of treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Specific targeted therapies have been approved for NSCLC patients harboring genetic alterations in four oncogenes, and agents targeting additional oncogenic drivers are under investigation. Standard first-line chemotherapy has been supplanted by these targeted therapies due to superior efficacy and lower toxicity. Despite excellent response rates and durable responses in some cases, most patients experience relapse within a few years due to the development of acquired drug resistance. Next generation targeted therapies are being developed to overcome drug resistance and extend the duration of therapy. In this review, we summarize the current treatment strategies for the major targetable oncogenic mutations/alterations in NSCLC and discuss the mechanisms leading to acquired drug resistance.

Purpose Advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK) fusion-positive non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) are effectively treated with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, clinical outcomes in these patients vary, and the benefit of TKIs is limited as a result of acquired resistance. Emerging data suggest that the ALK fusion variant may affect clinical outcome, but the molecular basis for this association is unknown. Patients and Methods We identified 129 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC with known ALK variants. ALK resistance mutations and clinical outcomes on ALK TKIs were retrospectively evaluated according to ALK variant. A Foundation Medicine data set of 577 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC was also examined. Results The most frequent ALK variants were EML4-ALK variant 1 in 55 patients (43%) and variant 3 in 51 patients (40%). We analyzed 77 tumor biopsy specimens from patients with variants 1 and 3 who had progressed on an ALK TKI. ALK resistance mutations were significantly more common in variant 3 than in variant 1 (57% v 30%; P = .023). In particular, ALK G1202R was more common in variant 3 than in variant 1 (32% v 0%; P < .001). Analysis of the Foundation Medicine database revealed similar associations of variant 3 with ALK resistance mutation and with G1202R ( P = .010 and .015, respectively). Among patients treated with the third-generation ALK TKI lorlatinib, variant 3 was associated with a significantly longer progression-free survival than variant 1 (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.79; P = .011). Conclusion Specific ALK variants may be associated with the development of ALK resistance mutations, particularly G1202R, and provide a molecular link between variant and clinical outcome. ALK variant thus represents a potentially important factor in the selection of next-generation ALK inhibitors.

Background: SCLC is an aggressive high-grade neuroendocrine malignancy. While SCLC is often highly sensitive to first line etoposide/platinum (EP), response rates to second line cytotoxic chemotherapy range ~10-30%. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) by olaparib (O) has shown activity in SCLC in preclinical studies, and may synergize with the alkylating agent temozolomide (T). We previously reported a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 34.5% among an initial 30-patient SCLC cohort treated with combination OT in a Phase I/II trial (Farago et al., ASCO 2018). Here we provide analysis after further expansion to a total of 50 patients (pts). Methods: Eligibility criteria included histologically/cytologically confirmed incurable SCLC which had progressed following ≥ 1 platinum-based chemotherapy. O (tablet formulation) and T were administered orally on days 1-7 of 21-day cycles, with a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of O 200 mg BID and T 75 mg/m2 QD. Response assessments were performed every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). PDXs were generated from a subset of patients prior to OT and at progression, and OT and EP activity were assessed in vivo in a panel of 32 PDXs in a co-clinical trial. Whole transcriptome expression analysis using RNA sequencing was performed in 31 models to identify candidate biomarkers of sensitivity and resistance, and lead candidates were further interrogated using immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry. Results: Among 50 enrolled pts, the median (m) age was 63 (range 39-85), m number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-7), 40% were male, and 72% were platinum sensitive. The confirmed ORR was 41.7%. After a m follow up of 7.1 months (mo) among 22 surviving patients, the m progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.2 mo, m overall survival (OS) was 8.5 mo, and m duration of response (DoR) was 4.3 mo. The ORR among platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant pts was 47.1% and 28.6%, respectively, with no significant differences in mPFS, mOS or mDOR. The most common grade 3/4 treatment related adverse events were neutropenia (38%), anemia (28%) and thrombocytopenia (26%). Among 41 pts treated at the RP2D, dose reductions occurred in 44% overall and 64% of those who received at least 3 cycles. OT activity was further assessed in SCLC PDXs. The efficacy of OT in PDXs derived from 4 patients on the trial mirrored that seen in the patients. Across a panel of 32 PDXs, sensitivity to OT only modestly correlated with sensitivity to EP (Pearson r=0.50 for best response and r=0.48 for time to progression). Candidate biomarkers for sensitivity and resistance to OT were identified in PDX models and validated in patient samples, and will be presented. Conclusions: OT is shows promising clinical activity in relapsed SCLC. A co-clinical trial in PDXs provides a powerful platform for assessment of cross-resistance to other therapies and identification of clinically relevant biomarkers. Clinical trials identifier NCT02446704. Citation Format: Anna F. Farago, Beow Yeap, Yin P. Hung, Marcello Stanzione, Jun Zhong, Sarah Phat, David T. Myers, Robert Morris, Marina Kem, Deepa Rangachari, David Barbie, Subba R. Digumarthy, Lecia V. Sequist, Aaron N. Hata, Mari Mino-Kenudson, Alice T. Shaw, Nicholas Dyson, Benjamin J. Drapkin. Expansion of Phase I/II study of olaparib and temozolomide in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and co-clinical trial in patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) for biomarker discovery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT198.

EGFR inhibitors (EGFRi) are effective at inducing transient tumor shrinkage in EGFR-mutant lung cancers. The efficacy of these drugs however is mitigated by the outgrowth of resistant cells: this is most often manifested by a secondary mutation in EGFR, T790M, which leads to reactivation of key intracellular signaling despite continued drug treatment. We recently demonstrated that T790M can occur both at low frequencies prior to initiation of EGFR inhibitor therapy, or alternatively arise de novo during treatment (Hata et al., Nat Med 2016). Since some cancers form T790M mutations de novo, one potential therapeutic strategy to thwart resistance is to identify the cells surviving initial therapy (referred to as persister cells or drug-tolerant cells [DTCs]) that eventually acquire the T790M mutation, and eliminate them prior to T790M acquisition. To this end, we hypothesized that some cells were refractory to EGFR inhibitor-induced apoptosis, surviving initial therapy and forming a reservoir of cells that could then eventually acquire T790M. We demonstrate that Western blots of lysates from EGFR-mutant lung cancers surviving initial therapy to the EGFR inhibitor gefitinib detect quick ( Citation Format: Kyung-A Song, Timothy L. Lochmann, Neha U. Patel, Jungoh Ham, Brad E. Windle, Hisashi Harada, Joel D. Leverson, Andrew J. Souers, Aaron N. Hata, Hiromichi Ebi, Anthony C. Faber. A protein synthesis switch underlies initial survival of EGFR-mutant lung cancer to EGFR inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fifth AACR-IASLC International Joint Conference: Lung Cancer Translational Science from the Bench to the Clinic; Jan 8-11, 2018; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2018;24(17_Suppl):Abstract nr B31.

Introduction: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a common and rapidly fatal malignancy for which no biomarker-targeted therapies have been developed. Despite a critical need, progress suffers from (1) scarcity of cutting-edge laboratory models and (2) absence of promising targets. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) may faithfully model the clinical disease, but because SCLC is rarely biopsied or resected, specimens for PDX generation are scarce. PARP inhibition has recently emerged as a compelling strategy for SCLC, and an ongoing phase 1/2 trial of combination olaparib tablets and temozolomide (O/T) has shown promising activity in patients. However, biomarkers for patient selection remain elusive. Methods: We generated SCLC PDX models from circulating tumor cells (CTCs), biopsies and malignant effusions. CTCs were enriched with an automated microfluidic device, the CTC-iChip. To assess the genomic fidelity of the models, we performed comparative whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA-seq on 6 sets of corresponding patient biopsies, founder (P0) PDX tumors, and early-passage PDXs. We then assessed the activity of combination O/T in a panel of PDX models, and compared PDX responses with molecular profiles to identify candidate biomarkers. Results: 44 PDXs were generated from 32 patients, including 6 sets of serial models and 4 synchronous CTC- and biopsy-derived models. PDXs were derived with high efficiency from both CTCs (35% per blood draw) and biopsies/effusions (82% per implant). WES demonstrated that somatic alterations in tumor biopsies were stably maintained in both CTC and biopsy-derived models, without significant accumulation of new mutations, and transcriptional profiles remained consistent through early passages. Six models were derived from O/T trial patients, including two sets of serial models before and after durable responses. The serial models faithfully recapitulated patient responses to O/T: pre-trial models were highly sensitive and post-relapse were highly resistant. The co-clinical trial was expanded to 30 models, using the models derived from trial patients to delineate the margins of clinical sensitivity (6 models), intermediate sensitivity (6 models) and resistance (18 models). Among the molecular features evaluated, basal protein PARylation best distinguished the O/T-sensitive category from both intermediate (p < 0.001) and resistant models (p < 0.0001). In addition, PARylation decreased after relapse in serial models from O/T trial patients. Conclusions: Both biopsy- and CTC-derived SCLC PDX models faithfully recapitulate the genomic and functional features of the donor patient tumor. O/T sensitivity in this panel correlated with basal PARylation. The value of the co-clinical trial is the potential to refine the clinical application of O/T in real time, to optimize follow-on clinical trials and to develop biomarker-directed therapy for SCLC. Citation Format: Benjamin J. Drapkin, Julie George, Marcello Stanzione, Beow Y. Yeap, Mari Mino-Kenudson, Camilla L. Christensen, Ruben Dries, Sarah Phat, Jun Zhong, David T. Myers, Joseph A. Licausi, Tilak Sundaresan, Marina Kem, Nima Abedpour, Leica V. Sequist, Alice T. Shaw, Aaron N. Hata, Mehmet Toner, Shyamala Maheswaran, Daniel A. Haber, Martin Peifer, Roman K. Thomas, Anna F. Farago, Nicholas J. Dyson. Co-clinical trial of olaparib and temozolomide in SCLC PDX models uncovers new biomarkers of sensitivity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2972.

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have yielded promising responses in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations and ALK translocations. However, these and other targeted therapies are limited by intrinsic and acquired drug resistance. The previous study from our group investigated tumor autonomous resistance mechanisms by developing patient-derived cancer models (PDCs). In this study, we aimed to decipher the non-autonomous resistance mechanisms via tumor microenvironment by developing patient-derived fibroblast (PDF) models. Method: Cancer-associated fibroblast cell lines are established directly from individual EGFR mutant NSCLC biopsies. These cell lines, as representative of each patient's tumor microenvironment, are further subjected to functional analysis. An imaging-based high-throughput platform is developed to screen for non-autonomous resistance by co-culturing PDC and PDF models in vitro. In the parallel, two independent approaches are performed to further identify mechanisms underlying the non-autonomous resistance. These include a drug screen to determine the pathway maintaining the cancer cells' survival, and a secretomic analysis on the PDFs to identify the plausible cytokine(s) responsible for the resistance. Result: By co-culturing screening, non-autonomous resistance can be found in a wide spectrum of models. The subsequent drug screen reveals both a canonical HGF dependent and novel HGF independent mechanisms contributing to EGFR TKI resistance. Both of these can be explained by the PDF's variable cytokine secretion and can be overcome by specific therapeutic combinations. Moreover, the microenvironment-driven EGFR TKI resistance has also been validated in vivo. And the prevalence of the identified cytokine is further tested in clinical specimens. Conclusion: PDFs provide a new avenue to explore non-autonomous resistance for targeted therapy. Applying this approach, we identified both the canonical HGF dependent and novel HGF independent mechanisms that putatively conferring EGFR TKI resistance. Taking EGFR TKI therapy as a paradigm, these findings will be valuable to optimize targeted therapy and to inform the design of personalized pharmaceutical interventions. Citation Format: Haichuan Hu, Lecia Sequist, Zosia Piotrowska, David Kodack, Aaron Hata, Matt Niederst, Cyril Benes, Jeffrey Engelman. Decoding tumor microenvironment to enhance NSCLC targeted therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4954.

e21231Background: Osimertinib (osi) is a potent, CNS-penetrant 3rd-generation EGFR TKI. Though older TKIs did not add benefit to chemo (IMPRESS, Soria et al 2015), combining osi with chemo to prolo...

8571Background: SCLC is a high-grade neuroendocrine malignancy with overall response rates (ORR) to second-line chemotherapy generally ranging from 10-30%. The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in...

Purpose: PD-1 inhibitors are established agents in the management of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, only a subset of patients derives clinical benefit. To determine the activity of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors within clinically relevant molecular subgroups, we retrospectively evaluated response patterns among EGFR-mutant, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive, and EGFR wild-type/ALK-negative patients. Experimental Design: We identified 58 patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Objective response rates (ORR) were assessed using RECIST v1.1. PD-L1 expression and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were evaluated by IHC. Results: Objective responses were observed in 1 of 28 (3.6%) EGFR-mutant or ALK-positive patients versus 7 of 30 (23.3%) EGFR wild-type and ALK-negative/unknown patients (P = 0.053). The ORR among never- or light- (≤10 pack years) smokers was 4.2% versus 20.6% among heavy smokers (P = 0.123). In an independent cohort of advanced EGFR-mutant (N = 68) and ALK-positive (N = 27) patients, PD-L1 expression was observed in 24%/16%/11% and 63%/47%/26% of pre–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) biopsies using cutoffs of ≥1%, ≥5%, and ≥50% tumor cell staining, respectively. Among EGFR-mutant patients with paired, pre- and post-TKI–resistant biopsies (N = 57), PD-L1 expression levels changed after resistance in 16 (28%) patients. Concurrent PD-L1 expression (≥5%) and high levels of CD8+ TILs (grade ≥2) were observed in only 1 pretreatment (2.1%) and 5 resistant (11.6%) EGFR-mutant specimens and was not observed in any ALK-positive, pre- or post-TKI specimens. Conclusions: NSCLCs harboring EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements are associated with low ORRs to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Low rates of concurrent PD-L1 expression and CD8+ TILs within the tumor microenvironment may underlie these clinical observations. Clin Cancer Res; 22(18); 4585–93. ©2016 AACR. See related commentary by Gettinger and Politi, p. 4539

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been identified as a mechanism of both adaptive and acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in in vitro models and clinical samples of EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a therapeutic strategy for targeting this mechanism remains unknown. In the setting of adaptive resistance early in the course of EGFR treatment, we observed that FGFR3 upregulation coincided with increased expression of mesenchymal genes, and a pooled shRNA dropout screen identified FGFR3 as a top sensitizer to EGFR inhibitor treatment. Dual FGFR (BGJ398) and EGFR (gefitinib) inhibition suppressed the outgrowth of drug-tolerant persister clones compared to EGFR TKI alone in vitro. Finally, we observed that the combination of BGJ398 and gefitinib prevented the development of in vivo resistance in PC9 xenograft mouse models. These results suggest that dual FGFR-EGFR blockade may be an effective strategy for preventing resistance associated with EMT in EGFR mutant NSCLC. Citation Format: Sana Raoof, David Ruddy, Daria Timonia, Leah Damon, Jeff Engelman, Aaron Hata. Targeting FGFR to overcome EMT-related resistance in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A142.

There are currently no effective targeted therapeutic strategies for KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Single agent MEK inhibitors have demonstrated showed disappointing clinical activity, partly due to inability to induce a robust apoptotic response. Combining MEK inhibitors with BCL-XL/BCL-2 inhibitors may be effective for a subset of KRAS mutant cancers that are dependent on BCL-XL for survival, however this combination is unlikely to be an effective strategy for cancers dependent on MCL-1. We investigated the effect of combining the MEK inhibitor trametinib with a novel MCL-1 inhibitor (compound A), which possesses potent and selective anti-MCL-1 activity in vitro and in vivo, on KRAS mutant cancers. In contrast to colorectal cancer models, which are largely sensitive to combined MEK + BCL-XL inhibition, a subset of cell line and patient-derived mouse xenograft (PDX) KRAS mutant NSCLC models were significantly more sensitive to MEK + MCL-1 inhibition compared to MEK + BCL-XL. To model potential clinical strategies, we tested intermittent dosing regimens and unexpectedly discovered a method strategy for dramatically sensitizing KRAS mutant NSCLC cells to the MEK + MCL-1 combination. These studies provide rationale for the clinical evaluation of combined MEK + MCL-1 inhibitors for KRAS mutant NSCLC. Citation Format: Aaron N. Hata, Faria M. Siddiqui, Maria Gomez-Caraballo, Samantha J. Bilton, Daria Timonina, Varuna Nangia, Angela Coxon, Sean Caenepeel, Paul Hughes. Combined targeting of MEK and MCL-1 induces apoptosis and tumor regression of KRAS mutant NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2163. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2163

Background: SCLC is an aggressive high-grade neuroendocrine malignancy. While SCLC is often highly sensitive to first line platinum based chemotherapy, response rates to second line cytotoxic chemotherapy range from approximately 10-30%. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) by the PARP inhibitor olaparib (O) has shown activity in SCLC in preclinical studies, though it does not confer PFS or OS benefit in the maintenance setting as monotherapy (Ahmed et al., 2016). Temozolomide (T) is an alkylating agent with modest single agent activity (ORR 22% in the second line setting; Pietanza et al., 2012), and may synergize with PARP inhibitors. Methods: This ongoing phase 1/2 trial of combination O/T in adults with SCLC (NCT02446704) enrolled patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed incurable SCLC which had progressed following at least one prior platinum-based chemotherapy. O (tablet formulation) and T were administered orally on days 1-7 of 21-day cycles at escalating doses using a standard 3+3 design in the phase 1 portion, with a primary objective of determining the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Response assessments were performed every 6 weeks. In parallel, patient derived xenografts (PDXs) were generated from biopsies and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from a subset of patients both prior to O/T and at the time of acquired resistance. O/T activity was assessed in vivo in PDXs and in short term cultures. Results: In the phase 1 portion, 13 patients were enrolled to four escalating dose levels. No dose limiting toxicities or grade 4-5 toxicities were observed. The most common grade 3 related toxicities were neutropenia (38%), anemia (15%) and thrombocytopenia (15%). O 200 mg BID and T 75 mg/m2 QD was selected as the RP2D. There were 6 confirmed partial responses (ORR 46%) and responses were seen at all dose levels. The median progression free survival was 5.6 months and median duration of response was 3.4 months. In PDXs, the depth and duration of responses of models derived pre-O/T mirrored those of the corresponding patients. Most pre-treatment models were more sensitive to combination O/T than to either O or T alone. Models derived post-progression were highly resistant to O/T. Further testing to identify biomarkers of response and resistance is ongoing. Conclusions: O/T is well tolerated in patients with SCLC and shows promising clinical activity in a phase 1 study. PDXs derived from CTCs provide a powerful platform for performing co-clinical trials and modeling acquired resistance. Additional correlative studies will be presented. Citation Format: Anna F. Farago, Benjamin J. Drapkin, Allison Charles, Beow Yeap, Rebecca S. Heist, Christopher G. Azzoli, David M. Jackman, David A. Barbie, Edwin Choy, Lecia V. Sequist, Shyamala Maheswaran, Daniel A. Haber, Aaron N. Hata, Nicholas Dyson, Alice T. Shaw. Phase 1/2 study of olaparib tablets and temozolomide in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) following failure of prior chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT048. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT048

9020 Background: Osimertinib (osi) is an EGFR T790M inhibitor. Mechanisms (mech) of acquired resistance (AR) are under study. We report a cohort of osi-AR pts with extensive pre/post-osi tissue and plasma. Methods: We analyzed 23 pts with AR to osi. Tumor biopsies (bx) underwent NGS (SNaPshot, MGH) and FISH for EGFR, MET amp (target:CEP7 > 2.2.) Plasma underwent ctDNA NGS (Guardant360). Results: Of the 23 osi-treated EGFR-mutants (13 with EGFR del19, 10 L858R), 2 had de novo T790M, 21 acquired T790M. 13 had prior 3rd gen EGFR TKIs before osi - rociletinib(11), ASP8273(1), EGF816(1). Median time on osi was 12 mo (range 2-25), med total time on 3rd-gen EGFR TKIs was 18 mo. Bx types were tissue (16), plasma (18), and both (11, med interval 31d). All pts retained their founder EGFR mutation, but 15/23 (65%) “lost” T790M post-osi, suggesting AR arose from a T790wt subclone (Table). Common AR mech were MET amp (7/23; 30%) and EGFR C797S (5/23; 22%). 1 pt each had SCLC transformation, PIK3CA E545K/PIK3CA amp and FGFR1 D60N/FGFR1 amp. 2 pts had 2 distinct post-osi tissue bx showing heterogeneity. Pt 8 had plasma and a lung nodule with C797S/T790M while a mediastinal LN was wt at both loci. Pt 22 had MET-amp in pleural fluid but no MET amp on lung bx. Plasma identified AR mech not seen in tissue in 2/11 pts with both bx types. Among 7 pts with MET amp, 3 received combo EGFR/ MET TKI; all 3 had a RECIST PR. Conclusions: In this osi-resistant cohort, we commonly saw MET amp (30%) and C797S (22%). MET amp seems more common post-osi than after 1st-line TKIs, and 3/3 pts responded to EGFR+MET TKIs. AR heterogeneity was seen in 2 pts with matched tissue/plasma and 2 with >1 tissue bx, underscoring the complementary roles of plasma and tissue. [Table: see text]