Search

This research opinion paper advocates for a new system of treating viral infections and diseases, it lays more emphasis on the current virus called Covid -19 virus (Corona Virus), it is a new innovation different from the known methods of treating viral infections and diseases. Some of the known methods include use of vaccines, anti -viral medication, monoclonal, serology. Most recently, stem cells have proved to be very effective in solving complex medical diseases such as leukemia, cancer and a host of other medical diseases that pose difficult challenges to the medical field. This method could be used to cure covid-19 permanently and then simulated to solve and cure other viral infections such as HIV and AIDS, Ebola, Hanta Virus and a host of other diseases like Malaria, Chicken-Pox, Small Pox, Measles etc. It is worthy to note that viruses are always evolving by way of mutation and are developing intelligent and strategic ways to beat or avoid being detected by the immune system, this can be seen in HIV and AIDS virus which attacks CD4 cells and even goes as far as engaging and fighting to wear down the T-Cells. Also, Covid -19 tries to proofread the cells to counter anti-viral drugs such as Ribavirin. Although Remdesivir anti-viral medication which has proven to work on some covid-19 patients, cannot be proofread by the corona virus. More insight about this "Autologous stem cells trapping mechanism" is discussed under conceptual framework of this research paper and attention should also be given to the suggestions and recommendations as they hold potential methods to permanently stop the actions of viruses in invading the human cells.

Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) is an apheretic technique that selectively removes high molecular weight substances using a plasma component filter. DFPP has been used to treat positive-sense RNA virus infections, mainly chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, because of its ability to directly eliminate viral particles from blood plasma from 2008 to about 2015, before direct-acting antiviral agents was marketed. This effect has been termed virus removal and eradication by DFPP. HCV is a positive-sense RNA virus similar to West Nile virus, dengue virus and the SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronaviruses. SARS-CoV-2 is classified same viral species. These viruses are all classified in Family Flaviviridae which are family of single-stranded plus-stranded RNA viruses. Viral particles are 40–60 nm in diameter, enveloped and spherical in shape. We present a rare case of HCV removal where an RNA virus infection that copresented with virus-associated autoimmune hepatitis was eliminated using DFPP. Our results indicate that DFPP may facilitate prompt viraemia reduction and may have novel treatment applications for SARS-CoV-2, that is, use of therapeutic plasma exchange for fulminant COVID-19.

This review considers antiviral nucleoside analog drugs, including ribavirin, favipiravir, and molnupiravir, which induce genome error catastrophe in SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-2 via lethal mutagenesis as a mode of action. In vitro data indicate that molnupiravir may be 100 times more potent as an antiviral agent than ribavirin or favipiravir. Molnupiravir has recently demonstrated efficacy in a phase 3 clinical trial. Because of its anticipated global use, its relative potency, and the reported in vitro "host" cell mutagenicity of its active principle, β-d-N4-hydroxycytidine, we have reviewed the development of molnupiravir and its genotoxicity safety evaluation, as well as the genotoxicity profiles of three congeners, that is, ribavirin, favipiravir, and 5-(2-chloroethyl)-2'-deoxyuridine. We consider the potential genetic risks of molnupiravir on the basis of all available information and focus on the need for additional human genotoxicity data and follow-up in patients treated with molnupiravir and similar drugs. Such human data are especially relevant for antiviral NAs that have the potential of permanently modifying the genomes of treated patients and/or causing human teratogenicity or embryotoxicity. We conclude that the results of preclinical genotoxicity studies and phase 1 human clinical safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics are critical components of drug safety assessments and sentinels of unanticipated adverse health effects. We provide our rationale for performing more thorough genotoxicity testing prior to and within phase 1 clinical trials, including human PIG-A and error corrected next generation sequencing (duplex sequencing) studies in DNA and mitochondrial DNA of patients treated with antiviral NAs that induce genome error catastrophe via lethal mutagenesis.

Background and Aims: HEV infection is the most common cause of liver inflammation, but the pathogenic mechanisms remain largely unclear. We aim to explore whether HEV infection activates inflammasomes, crosstalk with antiviral interferon response, and the potential of therapeutic targeting. Approach and Results: We measured IL-1β secretion, the hallmark of inflammasome activation, in serum of HEV-infected patients and rabbits, and in cultured macrophage cell lines and primary monocyte-derived macrophages. We found that genotypes 3 and 4 HEV infection in rabbits elevated IL-1β production. A profound increase of IL-1β secretion was further observed in HEV-infected patients (1,733 ± 1,234 pg/mL; n = 70) compared to healthy persons (731 ± 701 pg/mL; n = 70). Given that macrophages are the drivers of inflammatory response, we found that inoculation with infectious HEV particles robustly triggered NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation in primary macrophages and macrophage cell lines. We further revealed that the ORF2 capsid protein and the formed integral viral particles are responsible for activating inflammasome response. We also identified NF-κB signaling activation as a key upstream event of HEV-induced NLRP3 inflammasome response. Interestingly, inflammasome activation antagonizes interferon response to facilitate viral replication in macrophages. Pharmacological inhibitors and clinically used steroids can effectively target inflammasome activation. Combining steroids with ribavirin simultaneously inhibits HEV and inflammasome response without cross-interference. Conclusions: HEV infection strongly activates NLRP3 inflammasome activation in macrophages, which regulates host innate defense and pathogenesis. Therapeutic targeting of NLRP3, in particular when combined with antiviral agents, represents a viable option for treating severe HEV infection.

Introduction: The sofosbuvir-velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) combination is a direct-acting antiviral therapy that is authorized and available in Mexico, making the performance of a real-world multicenter study that evaluates the sustained virologic response at 12 weeks post-treatment a relevant undertaking. Methods: A retrospective review of the case records of 241 patients seen at 20 hospitals in Mexico was conducted to assess hepatitis C treatment with the SOF/VEL combination (n = 231) and the sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/ribavirin (SOF/VEL/RBV) combination (n = 10). The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients that achieved SVR at 12 weeks after the end of treatment. Results: Overall SVR was 98.8% (95% CI 97.35–100%). Only three patients did not achieve SVR, two of whom had cirrhosis and a history of previous treatment with peg-IFN. Of the subgroups analyzed, all the patients with HIV coinfection, three patients with genotype 3, and the patients treated with the SOF/VEL/RBV combination achieved SVR. The subgroups with the lower success rates were patients that were treatment-experienced (96.8%) and patients with F1 fibrosis (95.5%). The most frequent adverse events were fatigue, headache, and insomnia. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Treatments with SOF/VEL and SOF/VEL/RBV were highly safe and effective, results coinciding with those of other international real-world studies. Resumen: Introducción: La combinación de sofosbuvir-velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) es una terapia antiviral de acción directa que está autorizada y disponible en México. Esto hace que la evaluación de la respuesta virológica sostenida (RVS) 12 semanas después del tratamiento, por medio de la realización de una revisión multicentro en el mundo real, sea una tarea relevante. Métodos: Se efectuó una revisión retrospectiva de los registros de 241 casos de pacientes atendidos en 20 hospitales en México para evaluar el tratamiento contra la hepatitis C con la combinación SOF/VEL (n = 231) y sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/ribavirin (SOF/VEL/RBV) (n = 10). El objetivo de eficacia primario fue el porcentaje de pacientes que lograron la RVS 12 semanas posterior a la finalización del tratamiento. Resultados: En general, la RVS fue de 98.8% (IC 95% 97.35 a 100%). Solo tres pacientes no lograron la RVS, de los cuales dos padecían cirrosis y una tenía historia previa de tratamiento con interferón pegilado (peg-IFN). De los subgrupos analizados, todos los casos con infección de virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH), tres con genotipo 3 y aquellos tratados con la combinación SOF/VEL/RBV, lograron RVS. Los subgrupos con tasas menores de éxito fueron los pacientes que tenían experiencia con tratamiento (96.8%) y pacientes con fibrosis F1 (95.5%). Los eventos adversos más frecuentes fueron fatiga, cefalea e insomnio. No se reportaron eventos adversos graves. Conclusión: Los tratamientos con SOF/VEL y SOF/VEL/RBV fueron altamente seguros y efectivos y los resultados coinciden con los de otros estudios internacionales realizados en el mundo real.

Background and study aims: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has always been identified as a major health threat and a potential cause of liver cirrhosis , portal hypertension , and other associated problems. The introduction of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) has represented a paradigm shift in HCV management. In this study, we aim to observe the rate of sustained virologic response (SVR12) in a large scale of patients at a single center as well as record the post-treatment changes in the hematologic, hepatic, and renal biochemical profiles. Patients and methods In total, 1933 chronic HCV genotype 4 mono-infected non-HCC patients who completed the treatment with six different DAA regimens in the Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University Research Institute (MASRI), were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The rate of sustained virologic response after 12 weeks off-therapy (SVR12) was assessed. The baseline characteristics to predict the SVR12 were then analyzed. The post-treatment changes in many profiles were recorded and analyzed. Results The overall SVR12 rate was 96.2% (after excluding 84 cases who were lost to follow-up). It was achieved in 346/375 patients (92.3%), 466/477 patients (97.7%), 60/62 patients (96.8%), 11/11 patients (100%), 532/545 patients (97.6%), and 445/463 patients (96.1%) who received sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (SOF/DCV), sofosbuvir/daclatasvir/ribavirin (SOF/DCV/RBV), sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV), sofosbuvir/ledipasvir/ribavirin (SOF/LDV/RBV), sofosbuvir/simeprevir (SOF/SMV), and ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir/ribavirin (OBV/PTV/r + RBV), respectively. In total, 73 patients (3.8%) failed to achieve SVR12. The baseline aspartate aminotransferase (AST), cirrhotic status, and treatment regimen were determined to have a significant impact on SVR12. In the overall treated population, the levels of serum AST, alanine aminotransferase , albumin , creatinine, bilirubin , and hemoglobin and platelet count improved significantly after treatment. Furthermore, sustained virologic response was strongly related to cirrhosis and its degree. Conclusion The interferon-free DAA regimens offered high SVR12 rates in Egyptian patients with chronic HCV infection. They were associated with a significant improvement in the hematologic, hepatic, and renal biochemical profiles. The baseline AST, liver cirrhosis, and treatment regimen might have an impact on achieving SVR.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, due to the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in December 2019 and has rapidly spread globally. As the confirmed number of cases has reached 83 million worldwide, the potential severity and the deadly complications of the disease requires urgent development of effective drugs for prevention and treatment. No proven effective treatment for this virus currently exists. Most of the antiviral discovery efforts are focused on the repurposing of approved or clinical stage drugs. This review highlights the small-molecule repurposed antiviral agents that are currently under investigation in clinical trials for COVID-19. These include viral polymerase and protease inhibitors remdesivir, galidesivir, favipiravir, ribavirin, sofosbuvir, tenofovir/emtricitabine, baloxavir marboxil, EIDD-2801, lopinavir/ritonavir; virus-/host-directed viral entry and fusion inhibitors arbidol chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, chlorpromazine, camostat mesylate, nafamostat mesylate, bromhexine and agents with diverse/unclear mechanism of actions as oseltamivir, triazavirin, ivermectin, nitazoxanide, niclosamide and BLD-2660. The published preclinical and clinical data to date on these drugs as well as the mechanisms of action are reviewed.

BACKGROUND Human metapneumovirus (HMPVi) and parainfluenza virus (PIVi) infections are common community-acquired infections in lung transplant recipients (LTRs), but data are extremely limited. METHODS A retrospective study including all LTRs at the Johns Hopkins Hospital during July 2010-June 2019 with positive HMPV and PIV polymerase chain reaction respiratory specimens was performed. RESULTS Thirty-one HMPV- and 53 PIV-infected LTRs were identified. LTRs with HMPVi and PIVi had similar baseline characteristics, infection parameters, treatment allocation, and allograft function outcomes. Among entire cohort, 31.6% had chronic allograft dysfunction (CLAD) stage progression within 1 y postinfections (29.2% versus 35.5% for PIVi versus HMPVi, respectively, P = 0.56). In forced expiratory volume in 1 s percent (FEV1%) trajectory analysis showed steadily decline of FEV1 across time among CLAD stage progressors from both viruses. FEV1% decline ≥10% at 90 d had adjusted hazard ratio for CLAD stage progression of 18.4 (4.98-67.76) and 4.6 (1.36-15.34) for PIVi and HMPVi, respectively. PIVi caused higher donor-specific antigen development (11.8% versus 3.2%, P = 0.18) and 1-y mortality (9.4% versus 0%, P = 0.11), compared with HMPVi, even though the results were not statistically significant. Ribavirin did not show protective effect, and mycophenolate discontinuation during infection did not increase risk of CLAD stage progression. CONCLUSIONS One-third of HMPV- and PIV-infected LTRs developed CLAD stage progression within 1 y. The lack of early lung function recovery may predict long-term CLAD progression.

Viral infections are particularly common among children. They often have a mild course, are self-limiting and do not need any specific treatment. However, in some cases, the disease can be severe and lead to permanent disabilities. A variety of antiviral drugs are available for the treatments of certain infectious agents: for instance, acyclovir is used to treat herpes simplex virus encephalitis. Recommendations for flu treatment may change according to the current epidemiological surveillance data, on the basis of which antiviral sensibility can be forecast: recommended drugs for the 2020-21 flu season are oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir and baloxavir. Some drugs are used to treat congenital infections, such as valganciclovir and ganciclovir in congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Antiretroviral prophylaxis in newborns from HIV-1 infected mothers must be initiated as soon as possible, with one or more drugs according to therapeutic regimens based on the baby's risk category. According to the most recent guidelines, antiretroviral therapy must be started at diagnosis. Several antiretroviral drugs are available today and approved for use in children, so several combinations can be made. However, out of the 29 antiretroviral drugs approved for adults, only 38% (11/29) are approved for children under the age of two and about 60% (18/29) for children under the age of twelve. Treatment with direct antiviral agents against hepatitis C virus is approved for children over the age of three; it consists in different therapeutic regimens chosen on the basis of the viral genotype (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for genotypes 1, 4, 5 and 6, sofosbuvir/ribavirin for genotypes 2 and 3, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for all genotypes) and it has dramatically changed the course of the illness. Many molecules have been studied in order to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection, but only remdesivir seems to play a role in shortening recovery time, although inclusion criteria are very specific and data on the use in children is limited.

Background & Aims Retreatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) resulted in a rate of sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12) of >90% in HCV genotype 1 (GT1) patients who previously failed a regimen of sofosbuvir plus an NS5A inhibitor (NS5Ai). This study investigated the prevalence and impact of baseline NS3 and NS5A resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) on the efficacy of G/P in prior GT1 sofosbuvir+NS5Ai failures and the persistence of treatment-emergent RASs. Methods Longitudinal samples from 177 patients enrolled in a phase IIIb, randomized pragmatic clinical trial were analyzed. Patients without cirrhosis were randomized to 12 or 16 weeks of G/P, and patients with compensated cirrhosis were randomized to G/P and ribavirin for 12 weeks or G/P for 16 weeks. Linkage of RAS was identified using Primer-ID next-generation sequencing at a 15% cut-off. Results Of 177 patients, 169 (95.5%) were PI-naive. All 33 GT1b-infected patients achieved SVR12. In GT1a-infected patients, baseline NS5A RASs were prevalent (74.5%, 105/141) but NS3 RASs were uncommon. Baseline NS3 RASs had no impact on G/P efficacy and patients with baseline NS5A RASs showed a numerically but not statistically significantly lower SVR12 rate compared to those without NS5A RASs (89% vs. 97%). SVR12 was achieved in 34 of 35 (97%) patients without NS5A baseline substitution, and 53 of 57 (93%), 35 of 40 (88%), 5 of 8 (63%) with single, double-linked, and triple-linked NS5A substitutions, respectively. Among 13 patients with virologic failure, 4 acquired treatment-emergent NS3 RASs and 10 acquired NS5A RASs. Conclusion Baseline NS5A RASs were highly prevalent. The presence of an increasing number of linked NS5A RASs in GT1a showed a trend in decreasing SVR12 rates, although no specific NS5A RASs or their linkage pattern were associated with lower SVR12 rates. Lay summary Direct-acting antivirals have revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection, but treatment failure occurs in some patients. Retreatment of patients who previously failed a regimen consisting of sofosbuvir and an NS5A inhibitor with a regimen of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (G/P) is >90% effective. Herein, we analyzed samples from these patients and showed that retreatment efficacy with G/P is lower in patients with double- or triple-linked NS5A resistance mutations than in patients with single or no NS5A resistance mutations. Clinical trial number NCT03092375 .

Background Impact of interleukin 28B (IL28B) rs12979860 polymorphism on response to direct-acting antivirals agents in HCV genotype 4-infected patients is under investigation. Zinc may have an advantage in improvement of liver damage and treatment outcome. We aimed to evaluate IL28B polymorphism and zinc administration impact on patient response to treatment and amelioration of liver fibrosis. Results Three hundred patients on anti-HCV treatments were equally categorized into patients treated with dual therapy (sofosbuvir/ribavirin) for 24 weeks, triple therapy (sofosbuvir/ribavirin+pegylated interferon-alpha) for 12 weeks, dual therapy plus oral zinc and with triple therapy plus oral zinc. All patients were genotyped for IL28B. Sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved in 100% of patients with CC genotypes while 15.5% of CT/TT carriers did not attain SVR. After treatment, patients with CC genotype showed improvement in liver-related parameters compared with CT/TT genotypes. Zinc supplementation was associated with improved SVR in CT/TT genotypes and liver parameters in both CC and CT/TT genotypes. Hepatic fibrosis was improved in higher percent of CC genotype (16.7%) compared with CT/TT genotypes (5.8%). Interestingly with zinc administration, improved fibrosis increased to 60.9% in CC genotype vs. 15.4% in CT/TT genotypes. Conclusion Absolute SVR rates in patients with IL28B CC genotype support their selection for shorter treatment duration and therefore associated with high economic value. IL28B polymorphism is associated with improvement of hepatic functions and fibrosis after antiviral treatments. Zinc is powerful supplement not only to increase SVR in non-responders but also to improve hepatic functions and fibrosis.

Background. Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is characterized by activation of natural killer (NK) cells. Here, we asked whether HCV elimination by sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and the addition of ribavirin (RBV) improve NK cell function in liver transplant (LTx) recipients. Methods. We analyzed NK cell degranulation and interferon (IFN)γ-response along with STAT1 and STAT4 phosphorylation in 29 HCV-infected LTx recipients and 17 HCV-infected patients during DAA treatment. Results. Compared with uninfected LTx recipients, NK cells from HCV-infected LTx recipients were polarized toward cytotoxicity with increased CD107a-degranulation (10.1% versus 14.6%; P = 0.0263) and reduced capacity to produce IFNγ (43.0% versus 26.7%; P = 0.0002). The altered phenotype of NK cells in HCV-infected LTx recipients was accompanied by increased STAT1 (44.6% versus 87.4%; P < 0.0001) and STAT1 phosphorylation (0.7% versus 8.9%; P = 0.0005) compared with pSTAT4 IFNα-induction (29.9% versus 17.6%; P = 0.0014). Successful DAA therapy did not affect CD107a-degranulation but decreased STAT1. RBV cotreatment with DAA therapy for HCV increased CD56Bright NK cell IFNγ-responses in LTx recipients (70.9% versus 89.2%; P = 0.002), and this correlated to an increase in the inducibility of pSTAT4 (MFI 157 versus 173; P = 0.0002). Conclusions. RBV cotreatment of HCV infection improved pSTAT4-dependent IFNγ-production in NK cells. This is relevant especially for immunocompromised patients such as LTx recipients or patients with end-stage liver disease.

Актуальність. Хронічний гепатит С (ХГС) залишається однією з найактуальніших проблем сучасної інфектології. Останніми роками суттєво змінилися принципи проведення противірусної терапії завдяки появі нових препаратів з прямим механізмом дії та розробці безінтерферонових режимів лікування. Для лікування хворих на ХГС, інфікованих 3-м генотипом вірусу гепатиту С, в Україні були доступними два режими з включенням інгібітору HCV NS5B полімерази. Мета: проаналізувати ефективність різних схем противірусного лікування у хворих на хронічний гепатит С, інфікованих 3-м генотипом вірусу. Матеріали та методи. В дослідження було включено 66 хворих на ХГС, інфікованих 3-м генотипом вірусу. Усім хворим проведено дослідження ступеня фіброзу печінки методом фібротесту, у динаміці досліджували вірусне навантаження, печінкові проби, показники загального аналізу крові, функціональні проби нирок. Противірусне лікування та аналіз його ефективності здійснювали згідно з уніфікованим протоколом МОЗ України. Результати. За результатами аналізу результатів лікування хворих на ХГС, інфікованих 3-м генотипом вірусу, показана висока ефективність обох схем противірусної терапії, застосованих у клінічній практиці. Швидка вірусологічна відповідь мала місце в 93,5 % хворих на ХГС, які лікувалися за схемою: пегільований інтеферон (peg-IFN) α2a + софосбувір (SOF) + рибавірин (RBV), та у 82,9 % пацієнтів, які отримали безінтерферонову терапію SOF + RBV. Безпосередня відповідь на лікування була досягнута в 90,3 та 94,3 % пацієнтів відповідно до схем терапії. Стійка вірусологічна відповідь на 24-му тижні після припинення противірусної терапії відзначена в 87,5 та 91,4 % пацієнтів відповідно. Частота формування вірусологічної відповіді на противірусне лікування у хворих на ХГС, інфікованих 3-м генотипом вірусу, не залежала від стадії фіброзу печінки як при застосуванні безінтерферонового лікування SOF + RBV, так і при лікуванні інтерферонвмісною схемою з включенням препарату з прямим механізмом дії: peg-IFN-α2a + SOF + RBV. Висновки. Противірусна терапія хворих на ХГС, інфікованих 3-м генотипом HCV, супроводжувалася формуванням стійкої вірусологічної відповіді у 87,5 % хворих після 12-тижневого курсу лікування за схемою peg-IFN-α2a + SOF + RBV та 91,4 % пацієнтів після 24-тижневого курсу терапії SOF + RBV. Ефективність лікування цих хворих не залежала від ступеня фіброзу печінки., Background. Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) remains one of the most urgent problems of modern infectology. In recent years, the principles of antiviral therapy have substantially changed due to the emergence of new drugs with a direct mechanism of action and the development of non-interferon treatment regimens. Two regimens included HCV NS5B polymerase inhibitors were available in Ukraine for treating CHC patients infected with genotype 3 virus. Objective: to analyze the effectiveness of different schemes of antiviral treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C infected with genotype 3 virus. Materials and methods. The study included 66 patients with CHC infected with genotype 3 virus. All patients underwent study of liver fibrosis degree by the method of fibrotest; in the dynamics, we have tested viral load, liver tests, indicators of complete blood count, functional kidney tests. Antiviral treatment and analysis of its effectiveness were carried out in accordance with the Unified Protocol of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. Results. According to the results of treating CHC patients infected with genotype 3 virus, high efficacy of both applied schemes of antiviral therapy in clinical practice is shown. A rapid virologic response occurred in 93.5 % of CHC patients treated with peginterferon (peg-IFN) α2a + sofosbuvir (SOF) + ribavirin (RBV) regimen, and in 82.9 % of patients receiving non-interferon therapy with SOF + RBV. The immediate response to treatment was achieved according to treatment regimens in 90.3 and 94.3 % of patients. Sustained virological response at week 24 after antiviral treatment was noted in 87.5 and 91.4 % of patients, respectively. The frequency of virological response to antiviral treatment in CHC patients infected with genotype 3 virus did not depend on the stage of liver fibrosis, either in the use of non-interferon treatment by SOF + RBV scheme, or in the treatment with interferon-containing scheme included the drug with peg-IFN-α2a + SOF + RBV direct mechanism of action. Conclusions. Antiviral therapy of CHC patients infected with genotype 3 virus was accompanied by the formation of sustained virological response in 87.5 % of patients after 12 weeks of treatment using peg-IFN-α2a + SOF + RBV, and in 91.4 % of patients after 24-week course of SOF + RBV therapy. The efficacy of treatment in these patients did not depend on the degree of liver fibrosis.

Sustained virological response (SVR) to the treatment of recurrent HCV in liver transplant recipients has excellent clinical outcomes; however, little is known about the effects on allograft histology. The study aimed to assess the histology of the allograft liver. In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, patients with recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) in allograft liver who were cured with antiviral therapy between 2010 and 2016 were identified. Biopsies were reviewed by two liver pathologists blinded to the treatment and SVR status. Paired analysis was performed to compare pre- and post-treatment histological features. Of the 62 patients analyzed, 22 patients received PEGylated interferon/ribavirin (IFN) therapy, while 40 patients received direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA). The mean age was 57 years, 24% were female, and 79% were Caucasian. RNA in situ hybridization testing for HCV and HEV was negative in all the tested patients. Significant reduction in the inflammatory grade of post-treatment biopsy specimens was noted in all subjects (n = 57; p

Background: Direct-acting antiviral agents therapy is considered a breakthrough in hepatology due to high rates of sustained virologic response in all patients including those with decompensated cirrhosis. However, impact of Direct-acting antiviral agents-induced sustained virologic response on hepatocellular carcinoma development remains conflicting. Aims: This study aimed at evaluating the change in circulating levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and transforming growth factor-β1, the main angiogenic factors involved in hepatocarcinogenesis process, in cirrhotic patients achieved sustained virologic response after Direct-acting antiviral agents therapy. Study Design: This was a prospective, single-center, cohort study. Place and Duration of Study: Patients were recruited from the outpatient clinic of National Liver Institute, which considered a tertiary referral center in Menoufia University, Egypt (September 2018 to February 2019). Methodology: Forty-five decompensated cirrhotic hepatitis C virus infected patients with no history of hepatocellular carcinoma participated in the study. All patients received 60mg oral daclatasvir and 400mg oral sofosbuvir once daily for 12 or 24 weeks with or without ribavirin. Serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and transforming growth factor-β1 were measured at baseline and 12 weeks after the end of therapy. Results: The median serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor showed a non-statistically significant increase (from 1123 ng/L to 1269 ng/L, P = 0.126). But, transforming growth factor-β1 median serum levels exhibited a non-statistically significant reduction (from 13.22 ng/ml to 12.44 ng/ml, P = 0.163) 12 weeks after treatment. Conclusion: Our findings show direct-acting antiviral agents therapy do not affect vascular endothelial growth factor and transforming growth factor-β1 serum levels. But, a larger scale prospective cohort study on an extended follow-up period is recommended.

Background Previous studies reported worsened lipid profiles in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) during direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) treatment. This study aimed to investigate the effect of sofosbuvir (SOF)-based DAAs on changes in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in HCV patients. Methods A systematic review of articles published before 31 May 2021 was conducted by searching MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and CINAHL Plus. Eligible studies were those comparing SOF-based DAAs and non-SOF DAAs for HCV patients and providing numerical data for changes in LDL. Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies- of Interventions was used for assessing risk of bias, and meta-analysis was performed for changes in LDL. Results Six studies comprising 1248 patients were included, 848 patients treated with SOF-based DAAs and 400 patients with non-SOF DAAs vs. SOF-based DAAs group had significantly greater increases in LDL from baseline to week 4 than non-SOF DAAs group (P = 0.001). However, changes in LDL from baseline to the end of treatment (P = 0.060), to post-treatment week 12 (P = 0.263), and to post-treatment week 24 (P = 0.319) did not significantly differ between the two groups. Further comparison of SOF/ledipasvir with asunaprevir/daclatasvir revealed a similar trend in changes in LDL. Conclusions For HCV patients, SOF-based DAA regimens were associated with rapid and significant increases in LDL during the initial 4 weeks of treatment, and the changes did not sustain after the end of treatment. Potential mechanism might be related to the phosphoramidate side chain of SOF.

Background: Exact information about the efficacy of various medications proposed by regulatory bodies in children with COVID-19 is limited due to the lack of controlled trials in the existing literature. Methods: Different electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, COCHRANE CENTRAL, LitCovid, medRxiv, and bioRxiv) were searched for articles describing the management of COVID-19 cases in children with 18 shortlisted medications. Prospective/retrospective studies/case series (with at least 20 cases) reporting COVID-19 in patients aged ≤14 years were searched to collect information regarding clinical details and severity of participants, medications used, and outcome. The pooled estimate of these parameters across studies was performed using a random-effect or fixed-effect meta-analysis depending on the degree of heterogeneity. Results: From a total of 5794 records, 97 studies/case series (8243 patients) fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review. A total of 21% children received at least one medication specifically used for COVID-19. While antivirals were used in 15.3% of children, remedesivir was the most commonly used antiviral drug in 6.2% of included children without many reports of serious adverse effects. There was a more prevalent use of anti-inflammatory medications including corticosteroids (27.8%, P = 0.01). Total 91% of severe cases described in literature in children received some anti-inflammatory medications. Among them, corticosteroids (17%) and Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) (17.5%) were the most predominant followed by interferon (4.2%), tocilizumab (1.5%), and anakinra (0.8%). The most predominant therapy among multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) cases were IVIG (81%), followed by aspirin (67%), corticosteroids (64%), inotropes (62%), and anticoagulation (56%, mostly low molecular weight heparin, LMWH). Overall mortality was only 1.3%, but when we analyzed separately including only cases with moderate and severe disease, the mortality rate was 4.6%. Conclusion: Among pharmacological modalities, anti-inflammatory agents like corticosteroids and antivirals like remdesivir have the most promising evidence for severe cases of pediatric COVID-19. Intravenous immunoglobulin and other anti-inflammatory/immunomodulatory agents like anakinra, aspirin, and anticoagulants have important therapeutic role in cases with MIS-C. Most of the mild cases recover with conservative treatment only.

Background: For Interleukin 28b Single nucleotide poly-morphism (SNP) rs8099917, the favourable T allele is asso-ciated with a higher SVR after PEG-IFN alpha/RBV therapy while the G allele is a risk factor for non-response. Aim of Study: To assess the value of Interleukin 28b (SNP) rs8099917 as a predictor of SVR. Patients and Methods: This study is a retrospective con-trolled study and was performed on a total number of 240 patients who were treated by PEG-IFN alpha/RBV for 48 weeks and (SNP) rs8099917 was done for the all patients. Results: TT genotype was more prevalent in SVR group than TG and GG genotypes. Conclusion: IL-28b single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs8099917 is a strong pretreatment predictor of response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy in egyptian patients chronically infected with HCV genotype 4.

Autochthonous hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is an increasingly recognized zoonosis in western countries. It is often asymptomatic but may cause severe illness, particularly in immunocompromised patients or those with underlying chronic liver diseases. Even less frequently, cases of acute failure have been reported. In this article, we describe a case of an immunocompetent patient who presented with symptomatic acute HEV hepatitis and progressed to acute liver failure. The patient was transferred to another hospital for further management and transplant consideration. Unfortunately, he developed multi-organ failure thereafter and died before the transplantation became feasible. Subsequently, HEV was confirmed in archived serum by detection of HEV RNA using commercial RT-PCR. The results of this study have confirmed that HEV testing should be included in the initial evaluation of every acute liver failure regardless of travel history, risk factors or underlying chronic liver diseases. This approach might support clinical decisions and enable to use of potential antiviral therapy.

At present, over 180 million people have been infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) worldwide and there have been more than 3.8 million deaths due to the virus. However, specific effective antiviral treatment for this infectious disease is absent. At the beginning of the epidemic, relevant cellular and animal experiments of antiviral treatment for SARS-CoV-2 were conducted based on the prior studies of SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Some antivirals were preliminarily validated to be potentially effective in the clinical settings. But as the epidemic continued and more studies were carried out, the efficacy of these antiviral drugs became controversial. This paper reviews the pharmacology and application of interferon, lopinavir/ritonavir, ribavirin, chloroquine, arbidol, favipiravir, remdesivir, and thymosin α1 in coronavirus disease 2019. The actual effect of these drugs remains controversial. Meanwhile, the efficacy and safety of these drugs for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 still need to be explored.

Chronic infections with the hepatitis B and C viruses have significant worldwide health and economic impacts. Previous treatments for hepatitis C such as interferon and ribavirin therapy were ineffective and poorly tolerated by patients. The introduction of directly acting curative antiviral therapy for hepatitis C and the wider use of nucleos(t)ide analogues for suppression of chronic Hepatitis B infection have resulted in many positive developments. Decreasing the prevalence of hepatitis B and C have concurrently reduced transmission rates and hence, the number of new infections. Antiviral treatments have decreased the rates of liver decompensation and as a result, lowered hospitalisation and mortality rates for both chronic hepatitis B and C infection. The quality of life of chronically infected patients has also been improved significantly by modern treatment. Antiviral therapy has stopped the progression of liver disease to cirrhosis in certain patient cohorts and prevented ongoing hepatocellular damage in patients with existing cirrhosis. Longer term benefits of antiviral therapy include a reduced risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma and decreased number of patients requiring liver transplantation. This review article assesses the literature and summarises the impact of modern antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B and C on clinical outcomes from liver disease.

This work explores the application of a physiologically structured population (PSP) framework in modeling hepatitis C virus (HCV) kinetics. To do so, a model was developed for the viral RNA load in plasma and liver as observed in 15 patients treated with a combination therapy of pegylated interferon, ribavirin, and telaprevir. By including both intracellular and extracellular processes of the HCV lifecycle, the model provided a description of the treatment effect on the intracellular HCV lifecycle. Combining PSP models with a nonlinear mixed effects approach in a single model permits a natural inclusion of the direct‐acting antiviral effect on intracellular processes, which can then be integrated with the viral kinetics within the host while accounting for the interindividual variability between patients. This should allow an exploration of the treatment effect within the entire chronic HCV‐infected population.

Ribavirin is an inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase inhibitor with demonstrated activity against coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2. Five hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (confirmed by positive tests for SARS-CoV-2) received treatment with ribavirin for inhalation solution (ribavirin aerosol) as part of a compassionate use program. Patients included four men and one woman, with an age range of 29–72years. Patients were managed according to international and Italian treatment guidelines for COVID-19. In addition, therapy with ribavirin aerosol 100mg/mL was administered for 30min twice daily for 6days (i.e., 12 doses) in all patients. In order to address concerns about a possible increase in viral dispersal with the use of a nebulizer, healthcare providers remained outside the patient room during ribavirin aerosol administration. Pretreatment chest computed tomography (CT) scans showed pseudonodular areas of parenchymal thickening in the upper right lobe with associated ground glass opacities, multiple areas of parenchymal consolidation in both lower lobes with associated ground glass opacities, bilateral parenchymal thickening and multiple associated ground glass areas, or focal ground glass areas in the upper lobes bilaterally, which were almost completely resolved (three patients) or moderately cleared (one patient) on imaging at the end of ribavirin treatment. For a fifth patient, CT scans showed a stable pulmonary picture at the end of ribavirin treatment. No adverse reactions to ribavirin treatment were observed in any of the five patients. All patients recovered fully, and nasopharyngeal swabs obtained after hospital discharge tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Ribavirin aerosol appears to be efficacious in the treatment of patients with COVID-19. A controlled trial of ribavirin aerosol is ongoing and will provide additional data across a broader patient population.

Background: Hepatitis C virus treatment has dramatically improved by direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of DAA in elderly Egyptian chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients. Methods: The study was carried out on 327 CHC elderly patients &gt, 60 years, patients were divided into 3 age subgroups (&lt, 65, 65–75 and &gt, 75 years) on DAA therapy for 12 weeks. Ninety-one patients (27.8%) were treated with dual therapy, 234 patients (71.6%) with triple therapy and 2 patients (0.6%) with quadrable therapy. Results: All patients achieved end-of-treatment virological response (100%). ALT levels normalized during therapy. The follow-up rate of sustained virological response at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) was 100%. One hundred and two patients had missed SVR12 data due to being lost tofollow-up. Two hundred twenty-two adverse events were reported (67.8%), including anemia in 30 patients (9.1%), leucopenia in 129 patients (39.4%) and thrombocytopenia in 63 patients (19.2%). No serious side effects led to discontinuation of therapy. No hepatic decompensation was observed, and no patients died. Conclusion: Age does not influence the success of DAA treatment and all DAA regimens are well tolerated, safe and highly efficacious, even in those aged 75 years or older.

Background Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection represents a major health-related burden in Egypt. HCV is considered as a major cardiovascular risk factor. BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide) has been determined as a credible diagnostic and prognostic cardiac biomarker. We aimed to assess plasma BNP in HCV-positive Egyptian patients prior and after HCV eradication by direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) therapy. Eighty-nine chronic HCV-positive patients were enrolled in our prospective research. They were provided with DAAs therapy in the form of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir without or with ribavirin for 12 weeks. History, clinical evaluation, and laboratory assessment: CBC, liver and kidney function tests, viral markers (HCVAb, HBVsAg, and HIVAb) by ELISA, HCV RNA by real-time PCR, and BNP by ELISA were assessed. FIB-4 and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) scores were ranked. Results Plasma BNP displayed a non-significant (p = 0.124) increase of its serum mean values in post eradication of HCV than its baseline values. Baseline BNP exhibited a significant positive correlation with FIB4 (r = 0.411, P < 0.001) and APRI score (r = 0.418, p < 0.001) with a considerably negative correlation with platelets (r = − 0.274, p = 0.009), in addition to higher pretreatment BNP values in cirrhotic than in non-cirrhotic patients (p < 0.001), while non-significant relations were found regarding sex, BMI, and drug regimen (with or without ribavirin) (p = 0.950, 0.845, and 0.738, respectively). Additionally, plasma BNP values considerably decreased post-treatment in patients presented with higher baseline BNP values and more advanced liver disease (higher FIB4, APRI, and the presence of liver cirrhosis). Conclusion Our findings propose on the one side, the necessity of cardiac monitoring during chronic HCV infection and, on the other, the valuable impacts of HCV eradication on HCV-associated cardiac morbidities.

Background and Objective: Ribavirin (RBV), due to its mutagenic property, exerts cytotoxic effects on the testicular seminiferous tubules and its interstitium in various experimental animals. However, no study was done on the morphology of testicular capsule. Therefore, the present experimental study is designed to observe the transient effects of RBV in different doses on the testicular capsule thickness in albino rats.Methods: A total of 72 sexually mature adult male albino rats were divided into four groups: A (control) and, B, C, D where RBV was administered intraperitoneally for 5 days in different doses (20, 100, and 200 mg/kg body weight, respectively). Group received distilled water intraperitoneally. Each group was further divided into three subgroups according to three sacrificial time points that were 20th, 40th, and 60th day from the last exposure to drug. Randomly selected rats from each group were sacrificed on every time point. Histological slides were prepared and changes were observed microscopically.Results: On 20th sacrificial day, the increase in the thickness of capsules was seen in all groups with subcapsular edema in comparison to control group (p < 0.001). After discontinuation of drug, histological evidence of recovery in the form of decrease in the thickness of capsule with decrease in subcapsular edema were observed in low dose groups on 40th and 60th sacrificial days as compared to high dose groups which showed late recovery on both time points (p < 0.001).Conclusion: The testicular capsular thickening induced by RBV is reversible after cessation of treatment. &nbsp

Introduction: In Pakistan, for the patients of Hepatitis C virus (HCV), Direct-Acting Antiviral (DAA) therapy for 12 weeks and 24 weeks had been reported to be highly efficacious for genotype 3. We currently carried out an observational study to predict the rate of efficacy of sofosbuvir and ribavirin in hepatitis C patients to establish concrete or authentic data on this combination of DAA for long-term treatment. Materials and Method: Among 2000 subjects who attended tertiary care unit in Lahore-Pakistan from November 2018 to February 2019, 1990 satisfied the criteria set for the present investigation i.e. SVR12 after being treated with sofosbuvir and ribavirin combination. Results: It was noted that genotype 3a were more common among all the subjects under observation with 50.65 % (1008/1990) in females and 49.35% (982/1990) in males. Overall efficacy analysis was found to be 95.4% (1900/1990) in patients while the moderate response was noted in elderly subjects including both genders (61-90 years). DAA responders (male: female percentages) shown the following stats; 66.63 (42/66):36.36 (24/66) in 11-20 years, 56.6(240/424):43.39 (184/424) in 21-30 years and 44.73(272/608):55.27(336/608) in 31-40 years. Conclusion: Collectively, this combinational drug therapy was observed to be successful among the Pakistani population. However, more comprehensive follow-up studies are needed on a larger pool of population nationwide to check only this combinational therapy (sofosbuvir and ribavirin) would be beneficial or not? Or next-generation DAA regimes would be the choice for the Pakistani population.

Due to complex interplay between host and viral factors, pathogenesis of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is considered a challenging issue. Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is not confined only to liver but can induce disturbances in many other organs and systems. Our primary aim for this study was to evaluate biological response rates and sustained virological response (SVR) in patients diagnosed with CHC, treated with Interferon-alpha (IFN-α), Pegylated (PEG)–IFN-α2a or -α2b plus Ribavirin. The second aim of the study was the identification of predictive factors for a favorable response to antiviral therapy in patients diagnosed with CHC. We enrolled in this study 210 patients diagnosed with CHC who have accomplished all inclusion and exclusion criteria, treated with PEG–IFN plus Ribavirin. Patients’ recovery progress has been evaluated by determining: age, gender; biochemical tests: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST); serological assays – detect anti-HCV antibody and molecular assays – detect, quantify and/or characterize hepatitis C viral load (ribonucleic acid) (HCV-RNA); liver histopathological (HP) examination. According to their response to treatment, they were classified into responders (n=145) and non-responders (n=65). Liver biopsies were histopathologically evaluated for necroinflammatory grade and fibrosis stage according to the modified Ishak and Metavir scoring systems for chronic hepatitis. Demographic, laboratory, and HP results were introduced in statistical analysis. These parameters were included in area under curve (AUC) analysis in order to estimate their degree of influence on getting early virological response (EVR) and SVR. Our study demonstrates that factors connected to treatment failure in CHC are linked to older age, high hepatitis C viral load, and impaired glucose tolerance at beginning of treatment [high fasting glucose and insulin, high homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index] and also to liver histology features (high fibrosis score, liver steatosis, iron infiltration, and more or less high necroinflammatory activity). Analyzing results of our study shows that HOMA-IR index, serum insulin levels, baseline HCV-RNA, baseline mean blood glucose and HP score like Ishak fibrosis score, steatosis score and liver iron score may have a predictive value for obtaining an EVR in patients diagnosed with CHC.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We compared risk of acute liver injury and mortality in patients with COVID-19 and current, past, and no HBV infection. APPROACH AND RESULTS: This was a territory-wide retrospective cohort study in Hong Kong. Patients with COVID-19 between January 23, 2020, and January 1, 2021, were identified. Patients with hepatitis C or no HBsAg results were excluded. The primary outcome was mortality. Acute liver injury was defined as alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase ≥2 × upper limit of normal (ULN; i.e., 80 U/L), with total bilirubin ≥2 × ULN (i.e., 2.2 mg/dL) and/or international normalized ratio ≥1.7. Of 5,639 patients included, 353 (6.3%) and 359 (6.4%) had current and past HBV infection, respectively. Compared to patients without known HBV exposure, current HBV-infected patients were older and more likely to have cirrhosis. Past HBV-infected patients were the oldest, and more had diabetes and cardiovascular disease. At a median follow-up of 14 (9-20) days, 138 (2.4%) patients died; acute liver injury occurred in 58 (1.2%), 8 (2.3%), and 11 (3.1%) patients with no, current, and past HBV infection, respectively. Acute liver injury (adjusted HR [aHR], 2.45; 95% CI, 1.52-3.96; P

Enteral tubes are necessary for certain patients; however, medication absorption can be affected by this route of administration potentially resulting in decreased efficacy. All first-line treatments for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection are only available as tablets and may have decreased absorption if administered via an enteral tube. This report describes the first case of a pegylated interferon and ribavirin treatment-experienced patient who successfully achieved HCV cure after 12 weeks of elbasvir/grazoprevir administered via percutaneous gastrostomy tube. We further review the available pharmacokinetic and clinical literature regarding administration via enteral feeding tubes for all first-line direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). The literature suggests that crushed administration can be considered for DAAs in patients with gastric access. However, caution should be exercised in patients with extragastric enteral tubes and in those with altered gastrointestinal tract anatomy.

Introduction Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) swept rapidly throughout the world. So far, no therapeutics have yet proven to be effective. Ribavirin was recommended for the treatment of COVID-19 in China because of its in vitro activity. However, evidence supporting its clinical use with good efficacy is still lacking. Methods A total of 208 confirmed severe COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized in Wuhan Union West Campus between 1 February 2020 and 10 March 2020 were enrolled in the retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the use of ribavirin. The primary endpoint was the time to clinical improvement. The secondary endpoints included mortality, survival time, time to throat swab SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid negative conversion, and the length of hospital stay. Results 68 patients were treated with ribavirin while 140 not. There were no significant between-group differences in demographic characteristics, baseline laboratory test results, treatment, and distribution of ordinal scale scores at enrollment, except for coexisting diseases especially cancer (ribavirin group vs no ribavirin group, P = 0.01). Treatment with ribavirin was not associated with a difference in the time to clinical improvement (P = 0.48, HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.63–1.25). There were also no significant differences between-group in SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid negative conversion, mortality, survival time, and the length of hospital stay. Conclusions In hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19, no significant benefit was observed with ribavirin treatment.

Background and study aims Occult hepatitis C viral infection (OCI) may have serious complications, such as relapse, ongoing histological impairment, hepatic decompensation , hepatocellular carcinoma, and the possible risk of transmission. This study was conducted to assess the occurrence and prevalence of secondary OCI in patients with chronic hepatitis C viral infection (HCV) who received a complete course of directly acting antivirals (DAAs). Patients and methods Antiviral therapy consisted of sofosbuvir + daclatasvir ± ribavirin for 12 weeks to 90 treatment-naive, compensated, chronic HCV patients. Plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were tested for HCV RNA viral load by quantitative, reverse transcription, real-time PCR at 8, 12 (Group I, n = 45), and 24 (Group II, n = 45) weeks after treatment initiation. Results By week 8, only 2 and 7 patients were positive for HCV RNA in plasma and PBMCs, respectively. No HCV RNA was detected by weeks 12 or 24 in the PBMCs of Groups I and II, respectively. Older age was significantly associated with HCV RNA positivity in plasma and PBMCs (n = 8) at week 8 compared with HCV RNA negativity (n = 82). No other significant differences were observed for any other variables. Conclusion The development of secondary OCI among easy-to-treat patients following a full course of DAA treatment doesn't exist, hence, we do not recommend testing the HCV RNA in the PBMCs after complete course of treatment in this patient category. The detection of HCV RNA in PBMCs is recommended as a confirmatory test of cure following a shortened DAA treatment regimen.

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir ± ribavirin in Malagasy patients with hepatitis C virus genotypes 1 and 2, in real conditions. Patients and methods This was a retrospective monocentric clinical study, carried out over a period of 3 years from March 1, 2017 to February 28, 2020, in a hospital hepato-gastroenterology department. Results In total, 26 patients (M/F: 11/15) with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (n = 13) or genotype 2 (n = 13), were treated with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir without (n = 21) or with (n = 5) ribavirin for 12 weeks. The mean age was 61.38 ± 7.09 years. Seventeen patients (65.4%) had cirrhosis. The overall sustained virological response was 96.2% (95% CI = 80.4–99.9%). There was no significant difference between the sustained virological responses of genotypes 1 and 2 (92.3% vs 100%; p = 0.31) or those of cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic patients (94.1% vs 100%; p = 0.46). A relapse was observed in one patient (5.9%) — cirrhotic and genotype 1b — under sofosbuvir/ledipasvir with ribavirin. Seven patients (26.9%) experienced mild adverse reactions, including asthenia (57.1%) and insomnia (42.9%). Conclusion Treatment with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir ± ribavirin for infection with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 has been shown to be safe and effective, even in the presence of cirrhosis. The sofosbuvir/ledipasvir combination is a good option for genotype 2 non-cirrhotic patients.

Objectives: The treatment of acute herpangina is inconsistent. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of interferon α-2b spray versus Ribavirin for this disease. Methods: A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in eight hospitals in China between 2016 and 2018. 668 patients (1–7 years old) were randomized into an experimental group (treated with Interferon α-2b spray) or control group (received Ribavirin Aerosol). Body temperature returning to normal within 72 h and remaining so for 24 h was the primary outcome; release of oral herpes and adverse events were the secondary outcomes. Results: (1) The average age of onset was 2.5 years old. (2) After 72 h treatment, body temperature of 98.5% patients in experimental group and 94.3% in control group returned to normal and remained so for 24 h (P = 0.004). The differences were greater at 48 h treatment (95.2% vs. 85.9%, P < 0.001) and at 24 h (77.5% vs. 66.5%, P = 0.001). (3) The rate of improved oral herpes in the experimental group was higher than that in control group (46.7% vs.37.1%, P = 0.011). No adverse reaction occurred. Conclusions: Local application of recombinant interferon α-2b spray showed better efficacy for acute herpangina in children. It was safe for use.

Background Due to the latent onset of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), it is important to identify patients with increased probabilities for disease progression early in order to implement timely medical strategies. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with increased COVID-19 severity and evaluate the current antiviral drugs, especially in severe patients. Methods This was a retrospective observational study performed at the No. 7 Hospital of Wuhan (Wuhan, China) with hospitalized patients confirmed with COVID-19 from January 11 to March 13, 2020. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify the associated factors of severe COVID. Treatments of antivirus drugs were collected and evaluated. Results Of the 550 patients, 292 (53.1%) were female and 277 (50.4%) were > 60 years old. The most common symptom was fever (n = 372, 67.7%), followed by dry cough (n = 257, 46.7%), and dyspnea (n = 237, 43.1%), and fatigue (n = 224, 40.7%). Among the severe patients, 20.2% required invasive ventilator support and 18.0% required non-invasive ventilator. The identified risk factors for severe cases were: age ≥ 60 years (odds ratio (OR) =3.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13–8.08, P = 0.028), D-dimer > 0.243 μg/ml (OR = 2.734, 95%CI: 1.012–7.387, P = 0.047), and low oxygenation index (OR = 0.984, 95%CI: 0.980–0.989, P P = 0.029). Conclusions Age > 60 years, D-dimer > 0.243 μg/ml, and lower oxygenation index were associated with severe COVID-19. Arbidol might provide more clinical benefits in treating patients with severe COVID-19 compared with ribavirin.

Summary Viral resistance is a major reason for virological failure in patients being treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for chronic HCV infection. However, the importance of viral resistance mainly depends on the DAA regimen and HCV genotype. For first-line therapy with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) or velpatasvir/sofosbuvir (VEL/SOF) no general baseline resistance analysis is required because of the high antiviral activity and high barrier to resistance. If available, resistance testing may help to optimise therapy in certain subgroups of patients with HCV genotype 3 and other rare HCV geno/subtypes. Voxilaprevir/velpatasvir/sofosbuvir (VOX/VEL/SOF) is the first choice for the second-line treatment of patients following a previous DAA failure, with rates of viral eradication above 90% irrespective of the presence of resistance-associated substitutions (RASs). However, in resource-limited settings, only first-generation DAAs may be available for second-line therapy. Here, RASs selected during initial antiviral therapy should be considered if testing is available and rescue treatment should include a switch to a regimen with a new DAA class to optimise treatment response. Patients with HCV genotype 3 are overrepresented in the group who experience DAA treatment failure. Limited data are available for third-line therapies, but promising results have been achieved with G/P plus SOF or VOX/VEL/SOF with or without ribavirin for 12 to 24 weeks; these regimens should be administered irrespective of a patient’s RAS profile.

Backgroundand study aims:Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the main leading cause of liver disease in ‎Egypt. A new era of HCV treatment has been started with the evolution ‎of direct acting antiviral agents. Sofosbuvir (SOF)-based therapy was ‎introduced by the Egyptian ministry of health in 2014 in an attempt to ‎decrease disease burden. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of ‎Sofosbuvir-based regimens in HCV Egyptian patients with compensated ‎liver disease‎. Patients and Method:‎This study was conducted in National Liver Institute, Menoufia‎University, Egypt. Seven hundred patients out of seven hundred fifty-‎eight chronic HCV patients with compensated liver disease who met the ‎inclusion criteria were included. According to treatment regimen patients ‎were divided to 4 groups; group 1 received Sofosbuvir (SOF), ‎Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV), group 2 received ‎SOF plus RBV, group 3 received SOF and Simeprevir± RBV, group 4 ‎received SOF and Daclatasvir ±RBV‎.‎ Results:The overall SVR was 90.9%, 81.5%, 95% and 98% in groups 1, 2, 3, ‎and 4 respectively. SVR in patients with liver cirrhosis was 90.56, ‎‎79.16, 95 and 96% in the 4 groups respectively. In treatment ‎experienced patients, SVR was 86.8% in group 1, 78.3% in group 2, ‎‎100% in group 3 and 86.7% in group 4‎‎‎‎. Conclusion: Sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir with or without ribavirin is the safest ‎andmost effective SOF-based regimen in treatment of HCV Egyptian ‎patients with compensated liver disease‎‎‎‎.

Background: A major impact of the IL28B gene polymor-phism on the response to antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C have been described recently by a lot of studies. This study aims to scrutinize the impact of IL28B genotypes of donors and recipients on the response to treatment with INF based therapy or DAA among patients that underwent liver trans-plantation. Aim of Study: This study aims to correlate IL28B genotype of donors and recipients for patients that had undergone liver transplantation with the response to INF based therapy, and the response to Direct Acting Antivirals (DAA). Patients and Methods: Donor and recipient IL28B geno-typing by PCR was done for 24 patients who experienced LT for HCV-induced end stage liver disease with established standard follow up evaluations post liver transplant for two years. Pegylated interferon-a (PEG-IFN-a) and ribavirin were received by 10 of the patients and direct acting antiviral (DAA) agents were offered to the remaining 14 patients. Results: We found that there was no impact of IL 28B polymorphism on the response to anti viral treatment (AVT) by (DAA) agents, as all different IL 28B genotypes and different recipient/donor patterns eventually achieved SVR even in cases with two unfavorable non-CC genotypes in both recipients and donors. We also found that the donor rs 12979860 CC genotype was strongly associated with the success of PEG-IFN-a and ribavirin treatment of recurrent hepatitis C. Conclusions: In the era of DAAs, it seems likely that it will be possible to overcome the effect of IL28B polymorphism with DAAs combinations.

Although Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is mild and self-limited in children, some patients may develop excessive bleeding, massive liver necrosis, and multiple organ failure associated with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) induced by cytokine storm. Treatment of CCHF is mainly symptomatic and supportive. The efficacy of ribavirin, which is the only antiviral drug in the treatment of CCHF, remains controversial. Although therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been shown to beneficial in small case series with primary and secondary HLH, there is no pediatric patient with HLH secondary to CCHF treated with TPE in the literature. In this report, we describe the first pediatric patient who was successfully recovered from HLH secondary to CCHF with ribavirin, intravenous immunoglobulin, and TPE.

Qiao Tang, Li Wei, Xiaoqing Liu, Peng Hu Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute for Viral Hepatitis, The Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Chinese Ministry of Education, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Peng HuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Institute for Viral Hepatitis, The Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Chinese Ministry of Education, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 74 Linjiang Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400000, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86 13608338064Email hp_cq@163.comBackground: Previous studies have shown that sofosbuvir-based regimens yield high sustained virological response rates in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection except for genotype 3b complicated with cirrhosis. This real-world study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based regimens in Chinese patients with genotypes 3 and 6 infections, especially the impact of ribavirin coadministration on sustained virological response in cirrhotic patients with genotype 3b infection.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study that included 101 patients initiated on sofosbuvir-based regimens. The main endpoint of treatment was sustained virological response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12).Results: Overall, the SVR12 rates were 95.0% (96/101); specifically, the rates were 100% in sofosbuvir, 88.2% in sofosbuvir+ribavirin, 100% in sofosbuvir+daclatasvir, 100% in sofosbuvir+daclatasvir+ribavirin, 95.0% in sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, and 97.1% in sofosbuvir/velpatasvir+ribavirin (p=0.534). The SVR12 rates were comparable in patients infected with genotypes 3 and 6 (93.2% versus 97.6%, p=0.339). The SVR12 rate was 93.9% in cirrhotic patients (31/33). Among those infected with genotype 3, the SVR12 rate was 91.7% (22/24); the rate was 95.0% in those with ribavirin coadministration regimens, which was numerically higher than the 75.0% in those without ribavirin. However, no statistical difference was found (p=0.312). In total, five patients failed to achieve SVR12, including 3 patients with genotype 3b infection treated with ribavirin coadministration regimens (one of them was cirrhotic), 1 cirrhotic patient with genotype 3k infection, and 1 noncirrhotic patient with genotype 6a infection. No severe adverse event occurred.Conclusion: Real-world data show that sofosbuvir-based regimens are highly effective and safe for patients with HCV genotypes 3 and 6 infections.Keywords: daclatasvir, hepatitis C virus, ribavirin, sofosbuvir, velpatasvir

The article presents data on the treatment of 90 patients with HIV/HCV (human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis С virus) co-infection who received antiviral treatment against chronic viral hepatitis C (HVHC). Treatment using peginterferon in combination with direct acting drugs such as sofosbuvir and ribavirin was administered to 53 (59 %) patients on the background of antiretroviral therapy (ART), and other patients received non-interferon therapy. As a result of therapy monitoring, it has been found that some interferon- or ribavirin-dependent side effects occurred that required multi-disciplinary approach to patients’ management for timely correction of adverse events associated with both treatment regimen in HVHC and drug interactions in ART. Sustained virologic response (SVR12) was obtained in 86 (96.6 %) patients.

Hepatitis C virus genotype 4 (HCV-GT4) is a risk factor for cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver failure. A combination of three new direct-acting antivirals ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir has been recommended for treatment of HCV-GT4 infection. The current study was aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of this combination plus ribavirin in non-cirrhotic, treatment-naive and -experienced Egyptians with HCV-GT4 infection in a real-world setting. A total of 255 Egyptians with HCV-GT4 infection were enrolled, including 82 treatment-experienced and 173 treatment-naive patients. All of them completed 12-week treatment protocol of ombitasvir, paritaprevir and ritonavir as an oral dose combination with ribavirin. Virological response (VR) was measured, as well as the biochemical parameters related to treatment efficacy and adverse events at baseline and after treatment, at 4 (VR4) and 12 (VR12) weeks post-treatment. The results showed that the VR4 rates were 98.8% in both groups, and VR12 rates were 97.7% and 96.3% in treatment-naive and -experienced patients, respectively, with no significant differences found between the groups concerning VR4 (P=0.9) and VR12 (P=0.3). The most common adverse events were headache and fatigue, which were significantly more common (P=0.001 and 0.003, respectively) in treatment-experienced than in treatment-naive group. The quadruple regimen was well-tolerated, and the reported adverse events were generally mild to moderate. This real-world setting study confirms that the combination of ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir, and ribavirin is highly effective in the treatment of HCV- GT4 infection with a good safety and tolerability profile.

Background: Accumulating data suggest infectious agents are involved in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The two primary aims of this trial were to assess safety and efficacy of an antiviral drug combination on AD progression. Objective: The trial evaluated whether Apovir, a combination of two antiviral agents, pleconaril (active on enteroviruses) and ribavirin (active on several viruses), could slow AD progression. Methods: Sixty-nine patients 60–85 years were treated with Apovir or placebo for 9 months and followed until 12 months after end of treatment. Cognitive tests, safety, biomarkers, drug plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations were assessed. Results: The tolerability of Apovir was compromised as demonstrated by the large drop-out rate and increased frequency and severity of adverse events. The primary endpoint, demonstrating a difference in change from baseline to 9 months between groups in ADAS-cog total score, was not met (p = 0.1809). However, there were observations indicating potential effects on both ADAS-cog and CDR-SB but these effects need to be verified. Also, there was a decrease in cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β in Apovir at 9 months (p = 0.0330) but no change in placebo. Conclusion: This was the first randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial exploring antiviral treatment on AD progression. The trial is considered inconclusive due to the large drop-out rate. New trials are needed to verify if the indications of effect observed can be confirmed and which component(s) in Apovir contributed to such effects. Pleconaril alone may be studied to improve the tolerability and to verify if enterovirus is involved in the disease process.