Search

У статті обговорюється проблема хвороби Паркінсона (ХП), яка є другим за важливістю нейродегенеративним захворюванням у розвинутому суспільстві після хвороби Альцгеймера. В Україні поширеність ХП становить 140 випадків на 100 000 населення. Основними факторами, що підвищують рівень смертності при ХП, є деменція, наявність галюцинацій, дисфагії, переважання акінетико-ригідної форми з раннім порушенням рівноваги й ходи. Відсутність класичного тремору спокою, симетричність симптоматики асоційовані зі зниженням виживаності, на той час як наявність тремору спокою — зі збільшенням. Основна проблема в лікуванні ХП полягає в тому, що, незважаючи на досягнуте значне покращання якості життя хворих і виражений симптоматичний ефект, у цілому сучасні терапевтичні можливості поки не дозволяють запобігати подальшій дегенерації дофамінергічних нейронів і прогресуванню хвороби, тому клінічна практика вимагає впровадження терапевтичних стратегій, що впливають на патогенетичні основи хвороби. Це особливо актуально, коли пацієнти на ранніх стадіях ХП мають найбільш високий нейропластичний резерв, а стратегія їх безперервного лікування повинна бути орієнтована на десятиріччя вперед. Розробка нових терапевтичних засобів, включно з селективними інгібіторами моноаміноксидази (MAO), змінила обличчя лікування ХП. Пацієнтам віком 50–70 років із малою й помірною вираженістю рухового дефіциту й за відсутності виражених когнітивних розладів призначають лікування інгібітором МАО-В або агоністами дофамінових рецепторів; при тяжких рухових порушеннях — препаратами леводопи, а тоді, коли невеликі її дози (300–400 мг/добу) не забезпечують достатнього клінічного ефекту, додатково призначають інгібітор МАО-В, агоністи дофамінових рецепторів або амантадин з метою уникнення подальшого підвищення дози леводопи. Додавання інгібітору МАО-В і/або агоністів дофамінових рецепторів до леводопи дає змогу знизити її дозу на 15–30 % без втрати ефективності й сприяє відстроченню розвитку моторних флуктуацій.

Parkinson’s disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, affecting 1 to 2 % of people older than 60 years. Rasagiline is a potent and irreversible monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) inhibitor which has been approved for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Rasagiline inhibits MAO-B more potently than selegiline and has the advantage of once-daily dosing. In several large, randomized, placebo-controlled trials, rasagiline has demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy in early Parkinson’s disease and as adjunctive therapy in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Rasagiline has been shown to have disease-modifying, neuroprotective and anti-apoptotic effects. The data on its effectiveness in motor disorders in Parkinson’s disease and the rate of development of the effect against the background of its administration are presented. At the same time, taking rasagiline is not accompanied by serious adverse events, both with monotherapy and in combination with levodopa and dopamine agonists., Болезнь Паркинсона (БП) — второе по распространенности нейродегенеративное заболевание, затрагивающее от 1 до 2 % людей старше 60 лет. Разагилин — мощный и необратимый ингибитор моноаминоксидазы типа В (MAO-В), который был одобрен для лечения БП. Разагилин ингибирует MAO-В более эффективно, чем селегилин, и имеет преимущество — прием один раз в день. В нескольких крупных рандомизированных плацебо-контролируемых исследованиях разагилин показал свою эффективность в качестве монотерапии при ранней БП и в качестве дополнительной терапии при поздней стадии БП. Было показано, что разагилин оказывает болезнь-модифицирующее, нейропротекторное и антиапоптотическое действие. Представлены данные о его эффективности при моторных нарушениях при болезни Паркинсона и скорости развития эффекта на фоне его назначения. При этом прием разагилина не сопровождается серьезными нежелательными явлениями как при монотерапии, так и в сочетании с леводопой и агонистами дофамина., Хвороба Паркінсона (ХП) — друге за поширеністю нейродегенеративне захворювання, що торкається від 1 до 2 % осіб віком понад 60 років. Разагілін — потужний і необоротний інгібітор моноаміноксидази типу В (MAO-В), який був схвалений для лікування ХП. Разагілін пригнічує MAO-В більш ефективно, ніж селегілін, і має перевагу у вигляді прийому один раз на день. У кількох великих рандомізованих плацебо-конт-рольованих дослідженнях разагілін показав свою ефективність як у монотерапії при ранній ХП, так і в додатковій терапії при пізній стадії ХП. Було показано, що разагілін чинить хвороба-модифікуючу, нейропротекторну й антиапоптотичну дію. Наведені дані про його ефективність при моторних порушеннях при хворобі Паркінсона і швидкість настання ефекту на тлі його призначення. При цьому прийом разагіліну не супроводжується серйозними небажаними явищами як при монотерапії, так і в поєднанні з леводопою й агоністами дофаміну.

Background: One of the most prevalent neurodegenerative diseases with increasing age is Parkinson’s disease (PD). Its pathogenesis is unclear and mainly confined to glutamate toxicity and oxidative stress. The dyskinesia and motor fluctuations and neuroprotective potential are the major concerns which are still unmet in PD therapy. Objective: This article is a capsulization of the role of MAO-B in the treatment of PD, pharmacological properties, safety and efficiency, clinical evidence through random trials, future therapies and challenges. Conclusion: : MAO-B inhibitors are well tolerated for the treatment of PD because of their pharmacokinetic properties and neuroprotective action. Rasagiline and selegiline were recommended molecules for early PD and proven safe and provide a modest to significant rise in motor function, delay the use of levodopa and used in early PD. Moreover, safinamide is antiglutamatergic in action. When added to Levodopa, these molecules significantly reduce the offtime with a considerable improvement of non-motor symptoms. This review also discusses the new approaches in therapy like the use of biomarkers, neurorestorative growth factors, gene therapy, neuroimaging, neural transplantation, and nanotechnology. Clinical evidence illustrated that MAOB inhibitors are recommended as monotherapy and added on therapy to levodopa. A large study and further evidence are required in the field of future therapies to unwind the complexity of the disease.

Serotonin syndrome is due to excess serotonin in the nervous system. We document a case of an elderly Parkinson disease patient who has been neurologically stable on rasagiline and escitalopram for 1 year but developed serotonin syndrome after intake of an ethanol-containing homeopathic medication. The patient presented with seizures, autonomic dysfunction and neuromuscular hyperexcitability. Maintenance medications were discontinued, hydration, sedation and respiratory support were provided with resolution of the symptoms. The combination of escitalopram and ethanol, both metabolized by the cytochrome P450 enzyme system can lead to serotonin syndrome. Our case highlights the importance of drug interactions in patients taking several medications. Additionally, the intake of medicines, may it be conventional or homeopathic medicine, without the guidance of a trained and competent physician, may lead to serious consequences for the patient.

Background The current lack of effective treatments for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and the rapidly increasing burden of the disease highlight the urgent need to find new treatments. Despite accumulating evidence of the beneficial effects of rasagiline in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, the effects of rasagiline on the brains of patients with AD have not been elucidated. Purpose To examine the effects of rasagiline on regional cerebral flow (rCBF) in patients with AD using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Material and Methods Among 22 patients with AD, 11 patients received adjunctive rasagiline at 1 mg/day in conjunction with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEI); 11 patients were only treated with AChEI for about 1.6 years. All patients underwent brain technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime SPECT scans and clinical assessments at baseline and follow-up visits. Annual percent changes in rCBF were compared between the groups in a voxel-wise manner. Results SPECT analysis revealed that the rasagiline-treated group showed more increased rCBF in the cingulate gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, putamen, and thalamus compared to the comparison group ( P Conclusion We demonstrated that adjunctive rasagiline treatment may have beneficial effects on brain perfusion in patients with AD, suggesting potential neuroprotective effects.

Purpose To investigate the comparative effectiveness of dopamine agonists and monoamine oxidase type-B (MAO-B) inhibitors available for treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Methods We performed a systematic literature search identifying randomized controlled trials investigating 4 dopamine agonists (cabergoline, pramipexole, ropinirole, rotigotine) and 3 MAO-B inhibitors (selegiline, rasagiline, safinamide) for Parkinson’s disease. We extracted and pooled data from included clinical trials in a joint model allowing both direct and indirect comparison of the seven drugs. We considered dopamine agonists and MAO-B inhibitors given as monotherapy or in combination with levodopa. Selected endpoints were change in the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score, serious adverse events and withdrawals. We estimated the relative effectiveness of each dopamine agonist and MAO-B inhibitor versus comparator drug. Results Altogether, 79 publications were included in the analysis. We found all the investigated drugs to be effective compared with placebo when given as monotherapy except safinamide. When considering combination treatment, the estimated relative effects of selegiline, pramipexole, ropinirole, rotigotine, cabergoline, rasagiline and safinamide were 2.316 (1.819, 2.951), 2.091 (1.889, 2.317), 2.037 (1.804, 2.294), 1.912 (1.716, 2.129), 1.664 (1.113, 2.418), 1.584 (1.379, 1.820) and 1.179 (1.031, 1.352), respectively, compared with joint placebo and levodopa treatment. Conclusions Dopamine agonists were found to be effective as treatment for Parkinson’s disease, both when given as monotherapy and in combination with levodopa. Selegiline and rasagiline were also found to be effective for treating Parkinson’s disease, and selegiline was the best option in combination with levodopa among all the drugs investigated.

Parkinson's disease is a neurodegenerative disorder that manifests as motor deficits, tremors, rigidity, and postural instability. The most prominent pathological feature of this disease is reduced striatal dopamine concentration due to the loss of nigrodopaminergic neurons. Symptomatic dopamine replacement therapy is the standard management approach for Parkinson's disease. Treatment with monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors also improves Parkinson's disease symptoms by inhibiting the striatal dopamine metabolism and increasing the intracerebral dopamine concentration. Rasagiline is a potent and specific MAO-B inhibitor and is currently approved as an antiparkinsonian drug in more than 50 countries, including the United States and European countries. Clinical trials conducted in Japan to evaluate the efficacy of rasagiline monotherapy in patients with early-stage Parkinson's disease using the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II (patient motor experience of daily living) and Part III (clinician motor examination) have demonstrated the antiparkinsonian action of rasagiline. Furthermore, in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease receiving levodopa, concomitant rasagiline administration reduced the duration of "wearing-off". Based on these favorable results, rasagiline mesilate (Azilect® tablets) was approved for manufacture and sales in Japan in March 2018. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the pharmacological properties and clinical effects of rasagiline based on the results of domestic trials, with the aim of increasing the understanding of rasagiline use in Japan.

Background: Despite increasing worldwide incidence of Parkinson’s disease, the therapy is still suboptimal due to the diversified clinical manifestations, lack of sufficient treatment, the poor adherence in advanced patients, and varied response. Proper intake of medications regarding food and managing drug-food interactions may optimize Parkinson’s disease treatment. Objectives: We investigated potential effects that food, beverages, and dietary supplements may have on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs used by parkinsonian patients; identified the most probable interactions; and shaped recommendations for the optimal intake of drugs regarding food. Methods: We performed a systematic review in adherence to PRISMA guidelines, and included a total of 81 studies in the qualitative synthesis. Results and Conclusions: We found evidence for levodopa positive interaction with coffee, fiber and vitamin C, as well as for the potential beneficial impact of low-fat and protein redistribution diet. Contrastingly, high-protein diet and ferrous sulfate supplements can negatively affect levodopa pharmacokinetics and effectiveness. For other drugs, the data of food impact are scarce. Based on the available limited evidence, all dopamine agonists (bromocriptine, cabergoline, ropinirole), tolcapone, rasagiline, selegiline in tablets, safinamide, amantadine and pimavanserin can be taken with or without a meal. Opicapone and orally disintegrating selegiline tablets should be administered on an empty stomach. Of monoamine oxidase B inhibitors, safinamide is the least susceptible for interaction with the tyramine-rich food, whereas selegiline and rasagiline may lose selectivity to monoamine oxidase B when administered in supratherapeutic doses. The level of presented evidence is low due to the poor studies design, their insufficient actuality, and missing data.

Background Rasagiline has received attention as a potential disease-modifying therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). Whether rasagiline is disease modifying remains in question. Objective The main objective of this study was to determine whether rasagiline has disease-modifying effects in PD over 1 year. Secondarily we evaluated two diffusion magnetic resonance imaging pulse sequences to determine the best sequence to measure disease progression. Methods This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed the effects of rasagiline administered at 1 mg/day over 12 months in early-stage PD. The primary outcome was 1-year change in free-water accumulation in posterior substantia nigra (pSN) measured using two diffusion magnetic resonance imaging pulse sequences, one with a repetition time (TR) of 2500 ms (short TR; n = 90) and one with a TR of 6400 ms (long TR; n = 75). Secondary clinical outcomes also were assessed. Results Absolute change in pSN free-water accumulation was not significantly different between groups (short TR: P = 0.346; long TR: P = 0.228). No significant differences were found in any secondary clinical outcomes between groups. Long TR, but not short TR, data show pSN free-water increased significantly over 1 year (P = 0.025). Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale testing of motor function, Part III increased significantly over 1 year (P = 0.009), and baseline free-water in the pSN correlated with the 1-year change in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale testing of motor function, Part III (P = 0.004) and 1-year change in bradykinesia score (P = 0.044). Conclusions We found no evidence that 1 mg/day rasagiline has a disease-modifying effect in PD over 1 year. We found pSN free-water increased over 1 year, and baseline free-water relates to clinical motor progression, demonstrating the importance of diffusion imaging parameters for detecting and predicting PD progression. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Aim:We aimed to investigate the effects of rasagiline, which has a strong antioxidant, anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory effect, on acute lung injury that develops in the sepsis model induced with the CLP in rats. Main Methods:The rats were separated into the following six groups, Group 1: Sham, Group 2: Sham + Rasegiline 4 mg/kg, Group 3: Sepsis, Group 4: Sepsis + Rasegiline 1 mg/kg, Group 5: Sepsis + Rasegiline 2 mg/kg, Group 6: Sepsis + Rasegiline 4 mg/kg. A total of 4 holes were opened with a 16-gauge needle through the cecum distal to the point of ligation. Key Findings:GSH levels appear to improve due to increased doses of rasagiline, while SOD activity appears to improve only at the high dose of rasagiline. There was a statistically significant improvement in the doses of R2 and R4. This improvement in Tnf-α, IL1β, IL6, NF-κβand HMGB1 expression increased dose-dependent at R2 and R4 doses. In increased doses, rasagiline appears to prevent the development of edema, the formation of inflammation, and hemorrhagic areas are almost similar to healthy tissue. Significance: Rasagiline exerts both antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects on CLP induced acute lung injury in rats.

Besides the inhibition of monoamine-oxidase-B, high-dose safinamide (100 mg) also blocks voltage-gated Na+ and Ca++ channels and inhibits glutamate release at overactive synapses. This latter mechanism may provide further benefit to fluctuating Parkinson's disease (PD) patients compared to rasagiline. Here, we retrospectively investigated the consequences of shifting from rasagiline to high-dose safinamide in PD patients reporting symptoms of wearing-off, defined by the Wearing-Off-Questionnaire-19 (WOQ-19) score ≥3 at baseline. Seventeen PD patients were switched from rasagiline 1 mg to safinamide 100 mg because of the report of symptoms of fluctuations while under therapy with either levodopa+rasagiline or levodopa+rasagiline+dopamine agonists, or re-occurrence of fluctuations previously corrected by add-on with rasagiline. Patients were re-evaluated 4-6 months after switch. Switch to safinamide 100 mg produced benefit in 9/17 (52.9%) subjects, together with significant reduction of subjective symptoms of wearing-off. There was no report of adverse events. Findings from this retrospective, exploratory study suggest that safinamide 100 mg may produce more powerful benefit that rasagiline 1 mg as add-on to levodopa in fluctuating PD patients, possibly because of the bimodal mechanism of action of the former drug.

Background and purpose Despite accumulating evidence for the clinical efficacy and neuroprotective properties of rasagiline in Parkinson's disease (PD), effects of rasagiline on brain perfusion in PD patients have not been elucidated. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of rasagiline on regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in patients with PD using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Methods A total of 44 PD patients were recruited and treated with dopamine agonist, either alone or in combination with levodopa. Twenty-two of these patients (referred to as the rasagiline group) additionally received rasagiline (1 mg/day). All patients underwent brain SPECT scans and clinical assessments at baseline and follow-up visits. The mean follow-up period was 2.2 years. Changes in rCBF were compared between the rasagiline group and the comparison group in a voxel-wise manner. Results Annual change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score was lower in the rasagiline group compared to the comparison group (P = .01). A significant group-by-time interaction effect on rCBF was found in the right precuneus (P = .001), where rCBF was decreased in the comparison group and remained stable in the rasagiline group. Conclusions Our results show that adjunctive rasagiline treatment had beneficial effects on perfusion in the precuneus of PD patients, suggesting potential neuroprotective effects.

To evaluated and compare the intrinsic antioxidant ability of amantadine and rasagiline drugs using in-vitro diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl assay method. Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl assay method was used to compare the antioxidant activity of rasagiline and amantadine. At lower concentrations (200 - 400 µg/ml), there was a definite difference between amantadine and rasagiline with amantadine showing better antioxidant activity over rasagiline. But at higher doses (600 - 1000 µg/ml) both their antioxidant free radical scavenging activity were comparable. This study proved the intrinsic activity of rasagiline and amantadine which may be beneficial in attenuating the oxidative stress pathways, which were considered responsible for many degenerative diseases.

Objectives To evaluate whether the prescription of monoamine oxidase B inhibitors (MAOB-I), rasagiline and safinamide, contributes to the reduction of levodopa and/or dopamine agonists (DA) dose in order to minimize adverse effects. Materials and methods A total of 724 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have been prospectively included in our database since the year 2000, representing a total of 5124 visits. For each patient and visit, antiparkinsonian treatment was recorded. In the presence of rasagiline and safinamide, we analysed the evolution of levodopa equivalent dose (LED) and LED for DA (LED-DA). Results The data obtained from the 1664 visits between 2006 and 2010 (321 patients) and the 1709 visits between 2014 and 2018 (403 patients) were analysed in order to assess the impact of the introduction of rasagiline and safinamide, respectively. The annual mean LED remained stable without statistically significant differences. In the first period (impact of rasagiline), the annual mean LED-DA in 2010 was significantly higher than in 2006 (P = 0.001). In the second period (impact of safinamide), the annual mean LED-DA in 2018 was significantly lower than in 2014 (P = 0.002). A repeated-measure analyses of LED-DA including only patients who had taken safinamide showed a statistically significant decrease in LED-DA (P = 0.027). Conclusions The introduction of MAOB-I in the overall treatment of PD as part of routine clinical practice has not helped to reduce annual mean LED. However, safinamide reduces annual mean LED-DA and may be linked to a reduction in dose-dependent adverse effects in the long term.

Background: Rasagiline is a monoamine oxidase type-B inhibitor in development in Japan for Parkinson's disease (PD). The objective of this Phase 3, randomized, double-blind study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rasagiline in Japanese patients with early PD (NCT02337725). Methods: Patients were 30–79 years old with a diagnosis of PD within 5 years. Following a two-week placebo run-in period, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive rasagiline (1 mg/day) or placebo for up to 26 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the MDS-UPDRS Part II + III total score (TS). Secondary endpoints included the MDS-UPDRS Parts II + III, III, II, and I TS and safety. Results: In total, 118 patients were randomized to rasagiline and 126 to placebo. Patient characteristics at baseline were similar in both groups. The change from baseline in the MDS-UPDRS Part II + III TS was significantly greater in the rasagiline vs. placebo group (rasagiline-placebo: −6.39, 95% CI: −8.530, −4.250; P < 0.0001). The mean changes from baseline in the MDS-UPDRS Part II + III, Part III and Part II TS were lower at treatment visits between weeks 6 and 26 in the rasagiline vs. placebo groups. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 62.4% and 52.4% in the rasagiline and placebo groups, respectively; most frequent TEAE was nasopharyngitis (15.4% and 15.1%). Conclusion: Treatment with oral rasagiline 1 mg/day was effective and well-tolerated in Japanese patients with early PD, with a significantly greater improvement in the MDS-UPDRS Part II + III TS vs. placebo, and a similar safety profile.

Visual hallucinations are significant nonmotor symptoms in the course of treatment of Parkinson's disease. Previous studies have shown that the interindividual variability and pharmacogenetic profile of Parkinson's disease patients seem to influence the occurrence of visual hallucinations. In our study, we investigated a possible relationship of sequence variants in DRD1, DRD2, DRD3, DAT1, and COMT genes with the presence of visual hallucinations in Parkinson's disease patients. A total of 224 Brazilian patients from the Pro-Parkinson service at the Clinical Hospital of the University of Pernambuco, diagnosed with sporadic Parkinson's disease, were enrolled. Parkinson's disease patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of visual hallucinations. The sequence variants for DRD1, DRD2, DRD3, DAT1, and COMT were determined through the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism technique. Multiple Poisson regression analyses showed that individuals carrying the DRD3 Ser/Ser and Ser/Gly genotypes presented increased prevalence ratios of visual hallucinations (9.7-fold and 4.4-fold, respectively; P < .001). Regarding DAT1 rs28363170, there was a 9.82-fold increase in the prevalence ratio in patients with the 10/11 genotype, 8.78-fold for the 10/8 genotype, and 2.44-fold for the 9/8 genotypes (P < .001, for all). In addition, visual hallucinations were also associated with use of transdermal patches with rotigotine (PR, 3.7; 95%CI, 1.2-10.9; P = .017) and rasagiline (PR, 2.8; 95%CI, 1.3-6.0; P = .006). Our results suggest that the genetic variants DRD3 and DAT1, along with other therapeutic confounders, may influence the prevalence ratio of visual hallucinations.

Rasagiline is a monoamine oxidase B inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). We recently conducted the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of rasagiline in Japanese patients with early PD and now report the results of its open-label extension (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02337751). In the double-blind trial, patients aged 30–79 years with PD diagnosis within 5 years and Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part II + Part III total score ≥ 14 were randomized to placebo or rasagiline 1 mg/day for 26 weeks. Of 210 patients who completed the randomized trial, 198 (95 placebo, 103 rasagiline) entered the extension and received rasagiline 1 mg/day for 26 weeks. Analyses included patients who received rasagiline anytime during double-blind and/or extension periods; mean (standard deviation) treatment duration was 169.6 (39.57) and 316.5 (88.89) days in placebo–rasagiline (n = 95) and rasagiline–rasagiline (n = 117) groups, respectively. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; primary outcome) was 53.7% and 77.8% in the placebo–rasagiline and rasagiline–rasagiline groups, respectively. Drug-related TEAEs occurred in 24.2% and 49.6% of patients and serious TEAEs occurred in four (two drug related) and six (one drug related) patients in the placebo–rasagiline and rasagiline–rasagiline groups, respectively. The mean change in MDS-UPDRS Part II + III total score from baseline (before rasagiline) was − 2.8 points in both the placebo–rasagiline (mean [95% confidence interval] − 2.8 [− 4.05, − 1.59]) and rasagiline–rasagiline (− 2.8 [− 4.57, − 1.01]) groups. In conclusion, up to 52 weeks, rasagiline was well tolerated with sustained motor symptom improvement, supporting its use in Japanese patients with early PD.

Background The rate of clinical progression in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) varies between individuals and predictors for disease progression remain undefined. While the MSA-rasagiline study found no difference in the rates of clinical progression for patients treated with rasagiline versus placebo, it included a large, prospective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) substudy that can provide new information on the underlying disease progression in patients with early MSA. Methods This post-hoc analysis compared the rate of clinical progression in patients with MSA-specific structural changes at baseline (MRI-positive group) versus the rate of progression in patients without evidence of such changes at baseline (MRI-negative group) using a repeated measures ANCOVA. Clinical progression was assessed using the Unified MSA Rating Scale (UMSARS) and Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I). Results Twenty-eight patients with early MSA of the parkinsonian subtype (MRI-positive n = 13; MRI-negative n = 15) who had complete baseline and follow-up UMSARS data were included in this analysis. Patients in the MRI-positive group had faster clinical progression from baseline to the end of the 48-week study compared with those in the MR-negative group as assessed by the UMSARS total (p = 0.028) and UMSARS motor (p = 0.008) scales. At week 48, MRI-positive patients also had a significantly worse health status vs. MRI-negative patients (p = 0.015). Conclusions This is the first study to demonstrate that MSA-specific abnormalities on structural MRI might represent a variant of MSA-P that is associated with more rapid progression and an overall worse prognosis.

Background: Antiparkinsonian pharmacotherapy represents one of the most important expenses related to Parkinson’s disease. The application of generic drugs may help to reduce the economic burden of the disease; however, efficacy and safety of these products have been less studied. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of generic rasagiline (Ralago®) from a clinical perspective. Methods: The Clinical Global Impression of Severity scale was used to rate the most important motor and non-motor symptoms at baseline and 12 weeks after the initiation of Ralago®. Patients also identified symptoms which were the main sources of their disability and distress in everyday life. Results: A total of 499 patients were enrolled (231 females, mean age: 73.2 ± 9.1 years, mean duration of disease: 3.6 ± 3.7 years). Of them, 486 patients completed the study protocol. Both motor and non-motor symptoms showed improvement during 12-week Ralago® treatment. Adverse events were rare, and the majority of them were not considered as serious. Conclusions: The generic rasagiline (Ralago®) is an effective and safe generic product.

Author(s): Matthews, Dawn C; Ritter, Aaron; Thomas, Ronald G; Andrews, Randolph D; Lukic, Ana S; Revta, Carolyn; Kinney, Jefferson W; Tousi, Babak; Leverenz, James B; Fillit, Howard; Zhong, Kate; Feldman, Howard H; Cummings, Jeffrey | Abstract: BackgroundA Phase II proof of concept (POC) randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of rasagiline, a monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitor approved for Parkinson disease, in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). The primary objective was to determine if 1nmg of rasagiline daily for 24nweeks is associated with improved regional brain metabolism (fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography [FDG-PET]) compared to placebo. Secondary objectives included measurement of effects on tau PET and evaluation of directional consistency of clinical end points.MethodsThis was a double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, community-based, three-site trial of 50 participants randomized 1:1 to receive oral rasagiline or placebo (NCT02359552). FDG-PET was analyzed for the presence of an AD-like pattern as an inclusion criterion and as a longitudinal outcome using prespecified regions of interest and voxel-based analyses. Tau PET was evaluated at baseline and longitudinally. Clinical outcomes were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) model.ResultsFifty patients were randomized and 43 completed treatment. The study met its primary end point, demonstrating favorable change in FDG-PET differences in rasagiline versus placebo in middle frontal (Pnln0.025), anterior cingulate (Pnln0.041), and striatal (Pnln0.023) regions. Clinical measures showed benefit in quality of life (Pnln0.04). Digit Span, verbal fluency, and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) showed non-significant directional favoring of rasagiline; no effects were observed in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) or activities of daily living. Rasagiline was generally well tolerated with low rates of adverse events and notably fewer neuropsychiatric symptoms in the active treatment group.DiscussionThese outcomes illustrate the potential benefits of rasagiline on clinical and neuroimaging measures in patients with mild to moderate AD. Rasagiline appears to affect neuronal activity in frontostriatal pathways, with associated clinical benefit potential warranting a more fully powered trial. This study illustrated the potential benefit of therapeutic repurposing and an experimental medicine proof-of-concept design with biomarkers to characterize patient and detect treatment response.

Inhibition of mTOR is the standard of care for lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM). However, this therapy has variable tolerability and some patients show progressive decline of lung function despite treatment. LAM diagnosis and monitoring can also be challenging due to the heterogeneity of symptoms and insufficiency of non-invasive tests. Here, we propose monoamine-derived biomarkers that provide preclinical evidence for novel therapeutic approaches. The major histamine-derived metabolite methylimidazoleacetic acid (MIAA) is relatively more abundant in LAM plasma, and MIAA values are independent of VEGF-D. Higher levels of histamine are associated with poorer lung function and greater disease burden. Molecular and cellular analyses, and metabolic profiling confirmed active histamine signaling and metabolism. LAM tumorigenesis is reduced using approved drugs targeting monoamine oxidases A/B (clorgyline and rasagiline) or histamine H1 receptor (loratadine), and loratadine synergizes with rapamycin. Depletion of Maoa or Hrh1 expression, and administration of an L-histidine analog, or a low L-histidine diet, also reduce LAM tumorigenesis. These findings extend our knowledge of LAM biology and suggest possible ways of improving disease management., This research was supported by AELAM, The LAM Foundation (Seed Grant 2019), Instituto de Salud Carlos III grants PI15/00854, PI18/01029, and ICI19/00047 (co-funded by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), a way to build Europe), Generalitat de Catalunya SGR grants 2014-364 and 2017-449, the CERCA Program, and ZonMW-TopZorg grant 842002003. C.L.M. acknowledges the financial support (PRA-2017-51 project) of the University of Pisa. A.U.K. is supported by Nottingham Trent University’s Independent Fellowship Scheme.

Background. The pharmacological treatment options of Parkinson’s disease (PD) have considerably evolved during the last decades. However, therapeutic regimes are complicated due to individual differences in disease progression as well as the occurrence of complex nonmotor impairments such as mood and anxiety disorders. Antidepressants in particular are commonly prescribed for the treatment of depressive symptoms and anxiety in PD. Case Presentation. In this case report, we describe a case of a 62-year-old female patient with PD and history of depressive symptoms for which she had been treated with moclobemide concurrent with anti-Parkinson medications pramipexole, rasagiline, and L-DOPA+benserazide retard. An increase in the dosage of moclobemide 12 months prior to admission progressively led to serotonergic overstimulation and psychovegetative exacerbations mimicking the clinical picture of an anxiety spectrum disorder. After moclobemide and rasagiline were discontinued based on the hypothesis of serotonergic overstimulation, the patient’s psychovegetative symptoms subsided. Conclusions. The specific pharmacological regime in this case probably caused drug-drug interactions resulting in a plethora of psychovegetative symptoms. Likely due to the delayed onset of adverse effects, physicians had difficulties in determining the pharmacologically induced serotonin toxicity. This case report emphasizes the complexity of pharmacological treatments and the importance of drug-drug interaction awareness in the treatment of PD patients with complicating nonmotor dysfunctions such as depression.

Objective: This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and bioequivalence (BE) of two formulations of rasagiline tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions.Methods: An open, randomized, single-dose, double-cycle, two-sequence, self-crossover pharmacokinetic study in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and high-fat postprandial conditions was performed. A total of 108 healthy subjects (36 in the fasting group and 72 in the postprandial group) were recruited. In each cycle of the study under both conditions, subjects received a single oral dose of 1 mg of a test or reference preparation of rasagiline tablets (1 mg each). A washout period of 3 days was observed. Blood samples were obtained up to 10 h post-intake. Primary endpoints were the BE of major pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC0–t and AUC0–∞) and the maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax). Secondary endpoints were safety parameters.Results: The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the test drug vs. the reference drug for rasagiline was 94.16–105.35% for the AUC0–t under fasting conditions and 99.88–107.07% under postprandial conditions. The 90% CIs for the AUC0–∞ were 93.55–105.01% and 99.59–107.05% under fasting and postprandial conditions, respectively. The 90% CIs for the Cmax were 88.26–108.46% and 89.54–118.23% under fasting and postprandial conditions, respectively. The 90% CIs for the test/reference AUC ratio and Cmax ratio were within the acceptable range (0.80–1.25) for BE. In this BE study, there were no serious adverse events (AEs).Conclusion: BE between the test and the reference products was established in both fasting and postprandial conditions. The two formulations of rasagiline showed good tolerability and a similar safety profile.Clinical Trial Registration:chinaDrugtrials.org.cn, identifier CTR20181466.

Real-world healthcare data hold the potential to identify therapeutic solutions for progressive diseases by efficiently pinpointing safe and efficacious repurposing drug candidates. This approach circumvents key early clinical development challenges, particularly relevant for neurological diseases, concordant with the vision of the 21st Century Cures Act. However, to-date, these data have been utilized mainly for confirmatory purposes rather than as drug discovery engines. Here, we demonstrate the usefulness of real-world data in identifying drug repurposing candidates for disease- modifying effects, specifically candidate marketed drugs that exhibit beneficial effects on Parkinson’s disease (PD) progression. We performed an observational study in cohorts of ascertained PD patients extracted from two large medical databases, Explorys SuperMart (N=88,867) and IBM MarketScan Research Databases (N=106,395); and applied two conceptually different, well-established causal inference methods to estimate the effect of hundreds of drugs on delaying dementia onset as a proxy for slowing PD progression. Using this approach, we identified two drugs that manifested significant beneficial effects on PD progression in both datasets: rasagiline, narrowly indicated for PD motor symptoms; and zolpidem, a psycholeptic. Each confers its effects through distinct mechanisms, which we explored via a comparison of estimated effects within the drug classification ontology. We conclude that analysis of observational healthcare data, emulating otherwise costly, large, and lengthy clinical trials, can highlight promising repurposing candidates, to be validated in prospective registration trials, for common, late-onset progressive diseases for which disease-modifying therapeutic solutions are scarce.

BackgroundA Phase II proof of concept (POC) randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of rasagiline, a MAO-B inhibitor, in mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The primary objective was to determine if 1 mg of rasagiline daily for 24 weeks is associated with improved regional brain metabolism (fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET)) compared to placebo. Secondary objectives included use of flortaucipir PET to assess effects on tau pathology and determination of directional consistency of clinical endpoints.MethodsThis was a double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, community-based, three-site trial of 50 participants randomized 1:1 to receive oral rasagiline or placebo (NCT02359552). FDG PET was analyzed at screening for the presence of an AD-like pattern as an inclusion criterion and as an outcome using prespecified regions of interest and image classification for longitudinal data. Participants who completed baseline and 24-week FDG PET scans and passed quality control were included in the primary analysis; secondary clinical outcomes were analyzed using an Intention-to-Treat (ITT) model.FindingsBetween May 19, 2015 and January 26, 2018, 96 participants were screened, 50 randomized, and 43 completed treatment. The study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating favorable change in FDG PET differences in rasagiline vs. placebo in middle frontal (2.5%,95%CI 0.3–4.7%,p

The last couple of months have witnessed the world in a state of virtual standstill. The SARS-CoV-2 virus has overtaken the globe to economic and social lockdown. Many patients with COVID-19 have compromised immunity, especially in an aged population suffering from Parkinson's disease (PD). : Alteration in dopaminergic neurons and deficiency of dopamine in PD patients are the most common symptoms affecting 1% population above the age of 60 years. The compromised immune system and inflammatory manifestation in PD patients make them an easy target. The most common drugs under trial for COVID-19 are remdesivir, favipiravir, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin along with adjunct drugs like amantadine with some monoclonal antibodies. : Presently, clinically US FDA approved drugs in PD include Levodopa, catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors, (Entacapone and Tolcapone), dopamine agonists (Bromocriptine, Ropinirole, Pramipexole, and Rotigotine), monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors (Selegiline and Rasagiline), amantadine and antimuscarinic drugs. The drugs have established mechanisms of action on PD patients with known pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic properties along with dose and adverse effects. : Conclusion and relevance of this review focus on the drugs that can be tried on PD patients with SAR CoV-2 infection, in particular, amantadine that has been approved by all the developed countries as a common drug possessing both antiviral properties by downregulation of CTSL, lysosomal pathway disturbance and change in pH necessary to uncoat the viral proteins and anti- Parkinson properties. To deal with the significant prognostic adverse effect of SARS-CoV-2 on PD, the present-day treatment options, clinical presentation and various mechanisms are the need of the hour.

Parkinson’s disease is characterized by dopaminergic neurodegeneration in the substantia nigra. Although dopaminergic drugs are the mainstay of Parkinson’s treatment, their putative disease-modifying properties remain controversial. We explored whether prescription of dopaminergic stimulants for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) might affect Parkinson’s incidence. We performed Cox survival analyses for outpatient Parkinson’s diagnosis among ADHD-diagnosed seniors in the Optum Clinformatics™ Data Mart de-identified administrative claims database, correcting for diverse demographic and socio-economic status covariates. We compared 5,683 sustained users (≥ 90 days) of dopaminergic stimulants to 252 sustained users of atomoxetine, a noradrenergic first-line ADHD medication. Parkinson’s incidence was reduced among sustained dopaminergic stimulant users compared to atomoxetine users (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.56, p = 0.005). Effect sizes were comparable between derivatives of amphetamine (adjusted HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.48, p = 0.003) and methylphenidate (adjusted HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.04-1.76, p = 0.2). In sensitivity analyses, similar trends were observed when other psychotropics (SSRIs, gabapentin) were used as comparators instead of atomoxetine, or when the threshold for sustained use was defined as 45, 180 or 360 days instead of 90. Thus, sustained dopaminergic stimulant use was associated with lower Parkinson’s incidence among seniors with ADHD. Our results are consistent with a protective effect of dopaminergic stimulants on the development of Parkinson’s, and support a re-examination of certain dopaminergics, particularly rasagiline and other selective monoamine oxidase B inhibitors, as potential disease-modifying agents.

Background Advances in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) and changes in general life expectancy may have improved survival in patients with PD. Objective The objective of this study was to investigate recent trends in PD mortality. Methods In total, 1521 patients with PD in local and national registries were followed for 11 years (2006-2016) from diagnosis until exit date or death, and the causes of death were recorded. Results The survival of men with PD improved during the follow-up period, but no change was observed in women (2-year postdiagnosis survival in men, 79.0%-86.3%, P = 0.03; 2-year postdiagnosis survival in women, 82.8%-87.5%, P = 0.42). Pneumonia was the most common immediate cause of death. Discussion The survival of men with PD has improved in Finland without a similar change in women. Because changes in treatment likely affect both sexes similarly, the results may reflect the decreasing sex gap in life expectancy. This phenomenon will likely increase the already high male-to-female prevalence ratio of PD.

Background and purpose When switching between monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) inhibitors, a 15-day suspension period is a precautionary measure to avoid a serotonin syndrome and hypertensive crisis. However, this indication results in a major inconvenience for parkinsonian patients because of the worsening of their clinical condition. In routine clinical practice, neurologists often perform a substitution of these two drugs without solution of continuity (i.e. overnight), to avoid worsening of fluctuations and prolonged OFF periods. Therefore, a safety open label study was performed to investigate the possible risks of switching overnight from rasagiline to safinamide. Methods The study population included 20 advanced patients with Parkinson's disease on stable treatment with rasagiline and levodopa (alone or in combination with other anti-parkinsonian medication). The possible occurrence of serotonin syndrome and hypertension was monitored through a strict clinical observation and a 24-h Holter recording (ABPM) performed twice, whilst subjects were on rasagiline and immediately after switching to safinamide. Results No cases of serotonin syndrome or hypertensive crisis occurred during the study. Changes that were not significant occurred in the primary end-point: 24-h mean blood pressure (BP) had a mild +4.4% increase in the ABPM2 versus ABPM1 (P = 0.17), 24-h systolic and diastolic BP values were slightly higher at ABPM2 compared to ABPM1 (respectively +3.3%, P = 0.13; and 5.4%, P = 0.08) and 24-h systolic BP variability was unchanged between the two ABPM evaluations (from 8.6 ± 2.9 to 8.9 ± 1.8; P = 0.27). Conclusion The results of the present study confirm that the overnight switch from rasagiline to safinamide is safe and well tolerated by patients.

We aimed to evaluate the neuroprotective efficacy of rasagiline in pseudophakic patients who had surgery for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). This was a 6-month, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Patients presenting with acute macula-off RRD were recruited and randomized 1:1 to receive rasagiline 1 mg/day or placebo for 7 days. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography were acquired 1 day before as well as 2 days, 3 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery. We screened 26 patients with RRD whereof 23 were eventually included and randomized. The primary outcome was final BCVA. Secondary outcomes included central retinal thickness (CRT) and adverse events (AE). We evaluated photoreceptor cells (prc) recovery through morphological measurements. The baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. BCVA significantly improved in both groups (letters gained: rasagiline 61.5 ± 18.1 vs placebo 55.3 ± 29.2, p = 0.56), but no significant inter-group difference was found at any visit. CRT was stable 3 weeks after surgery onwards, with no inter-group difference. No treatment-emergent AE occurred. Significant prc restoration was observed from 3 weeks to 6 months after surgery, without inter-group difference at either visit. Ellipsoid zone integrity (β = 0.517, p = 0.008) and foveal bulge (β = 0.387, p = 0.038) were significant predictors of good final BCVA. In conclusion, perioperative oral treatment with rasagiline 1 mg/day for 7 days did not show significant benefits on visual or anatomical outcomes in macula-off RRD patients.

Background: A Phase II proof of concept (POC) randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of rasagiline, a MAO-B inhibitor, in mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. The primary objective was to determine if 1 mg of rasagiline daily for 24 weeks is associated with improved regional brain metabolism (FDG PET) compared to placebo. Secondary objectives included use of flortaucipir PET to assess effects on tau pathology and determination of directional consistency of clinical endpoints with FDG PET. Methods: This was a double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, community-based, three-site trial of 50 participants randomized 1:1 to receive oral rasagiline or placebo (NCT02359552). FDG PET was analyzed at screening for the presence of an AD-like pattern as an inclusion criterion and longitudinally using prespecified regions of interest and image classification. Participants who completed baseline and 24-week FDG PET scans and passed quality control were included in the primary analysis; secondary clinical outcomes were analyzed using an ITT model. Findings: Between May 19, 2015 and January 26, 2018, 96 participants were screened, 50 randomized, and 43 completed treatment. The study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating favorable change in FDG PET differences in rasagiline vs. placebo in middle frontal (2·5%,95%CI 0·3–4·7%,p

Introduction Rasagiline is a monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitor with possible neuroprotective effects in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Methods We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 80 ALS participants with enrichment of the placebo group with historical controls (n = 177) at 10 centers in the United States. Participants were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to 2 mg/day rasagiline or placebo. The primary outcome was average slope of decline on the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R). Secondary measures included slow vital capacity, survival, mitochondrial and molecular biomarkers, and adverse-event reporting. Results There was no difference in the average 12-month ALSFRS-R slope between rasagiline and the mixed placebo and historical control cohorts. Rasagiline did not show signs of drug-target engagement in urine and blood biomarkers. Rasagiline was well tolerated with no serious adverse events. Discussion Rasagiline did not alter disease progression compared with controls over 12 months of treatment. Muscle Nerve 59:201-207, 2019.

Te lecture presents modern concept of the symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), which accounts for about 10% of cases of dementia. Te nosological status of DLB and the problem of ratio of DLB and Parkinson’s disease which, apparently, represent two phenotypic variants of one neurodegenerative process («diseases with Lewy bodies») are considered in historical aspect. Approaches to the diagnosis and coding of DLB in accordance with ICD-10 are proposed. Te role of cholinesterase inhibitors, antipsychotics, levodopa, rasagiline and other drugs in the treatment of patients with DLB is аnalyzed.

Parkinson’s disease has been considered as a motor neuron disease with dopamine (DA) deficit caused by neuronal loss in the substantia nigra, but now proposed as a multi-system disorder associated with α-synuclein accumulation in neuronal and non-neuronal systems. Neuroprotection in Parkinson’s disease has intended to halt or reverse cell death of nigro-striatal DA neurons and prevent the disease progression, but clinical studies have not presented enough beneficial results, except the trial of rasagiline by delayed start design at low dose of 1 mg/day only. Now strategy of disease-modifying therapy should be reconsidered taking consideration of accumulation and toxicity of α-synuclein preceding the manifest of motor symptoms. Hitherto neuroprotective therapy has been aimed to mitigate non-specific risk factors; oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis, deficits of neurotrophic factors (NTFs), inflammation and accumulation of pathogenic protein. Future disease-modify therapy should target more specified pathogenic factors, including deregulated mitochondrial homeostasis, deficit of NTFs and α-synuclein toxicity. Selegiline and rasagiline, inhibitors of type B monoamine oxidase, have been proved to exhibit potent neuroprotective function: regulation of mitochondrial apoptosis system, maintenance of mitochondrial function, increased expression of genes coding antioxidant enzymes, anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 and pro-survival NTFs, and suppression of oligomerization and aggregation of α-synuclein and the toxicity in cellular and animal experiments. However, the present available pharmacological therapy starts too late to reverse disease progression, and future disease-modifying therapy should include also non-pharmacological complementary therapy during the prodromal stage.

International audience; Background: Rasagiline, a monoamine oxidase B inhibitor with neuroprotective potential in Parkinson's disease, has shown a disease-modifying effect in the SOD1-Gly93Ala low-expressing mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, both alone and in combination with riluzole. We sought to test whether or not rasagiline 1 mg/day can prolong survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis also receiving riluzole.Methods: Patients with possible, probable, or definite amyotrophic lateral sclerosis were enrolled to our randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, double-blind, phase 2 trial from 15 German network for motor neuron diseases (MND-NET) centres (university hospitals or clinics). Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years, had onset of progressive weakness within the 36 months before the study, had disease duration of more than 6 months and less than 3 years, and had a best-sitting slow vital capacity of at least 50%. After a 4-week screening period, eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either rasagiline (1 mg/day) or placebo in addition to riluzole (100 mg/day), after stratification for site of onset (bulbar or spinal) and study centre. Patients and all personnel assessing outcome parameters were masked to treatment allocation. Patients were followed up 2, 6, 12, and 18 months after randomisation. The primary endpoint was survival time, defined as the time to death or time to study cutoff date (ie, the last patient's last visit plus 14 days). Analyses of primary outcome and safety measures were done in all patients who received at least one dose of trial treatment (intention-to-treat population). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01879241.Findings: Between July 2, 2013, and Nov 11, 2014, 273 patients were screened for eligibility, and 252 patients were randomly assigned to receive rasagiline (n=127) or placebo (n=125). 126 patients taking rasagiline and 125 taking placebo were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. For the primary outcome, the survival probability at the end of the study was 0·43 (95% CI 0·25-0·59) in the rasagiline group (n=126) and 0·53 (0·43-0·62) in the placebo group (n=125). The estimated effect size (hazard ratio) was 0·91 (one-sided 97·5% CI -infinity to 1·34; p=0·31). Rasagiline was well tolerated, and most adverse events were due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease progression rather than treatment; the most frequent of these were dysphagia (32 [25%] taking rasagiline vs 24 [19%] taking placebo) and respiratory failure (25 [20%] vs 31 [25%]). Frequency of adverse events were comparable between both groups.Interpretation: Rasagiline was safe in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. There was no difference between groups in the primary outcome of survival, although post-hoc analysis suggested that rasagiline might modify disease progression in patients with an initial slope of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised greater than 0·5 points per month at baseline. This should be confirmed in another clinical trial.Funding: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries.

Aims To the best of our knowledge, there are no systematic reviews or meta-analyses that compare rasagiline, selegiline and safinamide. Therefore, we aimed to perform a drug class review comparing all available monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) inhibitors in a multiple treatment comparison. Methods We performed a systematic literature search to identify randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of MAO-B inhibitors in patients with Parkinson's disease. MAO-B inhibitors were evaluated either as monotherapy or in combination with levodopa or dopamine agonists. Endpoints of interest were change in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score and serious adverse events. We estimated the relative effect of each MAO-B inhibitor versus the comparator drug by creating three networks of direct and indirect comparisons. For each of the networks, we considered a joint model. Results The systematic literature search and study selection process identified 27 publications eligible for our three network analyses. We found the relative effects of rasagiline, safinamide and selegiline treatment given alone and compared to placebo in a model without explanatory variables to be 1.560 (1.409, 1.734), 1.449 (0.873, 2.413) and 1.532 (1.337, 1.757) respectively. We also found all MAO-B inhibitors to be efficient when given together with levodopa. When ranking the MAO-B inhibitors given in combination with levodopa, selegiline was the most effective and rasagiline was the second best. Conclusions All of the included MAO-B inhibitors were effective compared to placebo when given as monotherapy. Combination therapy with MAO-B inhibitors and levodopa showed that all three MAO-B inhibitors were effective compared to placebo, but selegiline was the most effective drug.