Search

Previous studies have reported that primary cutaneous lymphomas profoundly influence patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, assessment of this psycho-social concept is not common in routine patient care unless required within clinical trials. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of HRQoL measures and outcomes in cutaneous lym­phomas in order to inform clinicians. Advanced-stage cutaneous lymphomas were found to be associated with worse HRQoL than early-stage disease. Specifically, progression of the disease, age, sex, psychosocial issues, educational level and therapy were related to the extent of impairment of HRQoL. Treatment response was linked to improved HRQoL, but notably ameliorated HRQoL scores were also reported despite objective disease response. However, the variety of instruments applied to measure HRQoL in cutaneous lymphomas makes it difficult to compare data directly. In conclusion, speciality-specific HRQoL instruments were superior to generic ones, which probably failed to recognize small, but relevant, changes, demonstrating the need for a disease-specific tool.

During severe inflammatory coronavirus infectious disease (CoVID‐19) pandemic and based on evidence on COVID‐19 epidemiology, patients with primary cutaneous lymphomas (PCLs) have risk for developing complicated COVID‐19 infections in consideration of their older age (majority above 60) and their potential underlying predisposing conditions (e.g. hypertension, diabetes).1,2,3 Moreover, PCL patients with aggressive biologic behavior should be carefully monitored according to guidelines for patients with neoplastic disease.

Primary cutaneous lymphomas (pCL) are the second most common type of extra-nodal non-Hodgkin′s1. In U.S, the incidence rate (IR) of pCL is 10/ 1,000,000 person-years, but data from Spain are very limited. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

International audience; Therapeutic progress in primary cutaneous lymphomas continues to be largely dominated by the T-cell lymphomas, towards which the great majority of recent therapeutic innovations have been directed. The latter include local treatments consisting either of relatively classical but "revamped" approaches involving different pharmaceutical forms (example: chlormethine gel) or else lower but seemingly equally effective dosages (electron therapy), or of more innovative approaches (example: UVA-1, dynamic phototherapy, imiquimod, resimiquimod). However, significant progress has been made chiefly in terms of systemic treatments with the emergence of "targeted" drugs that directly and specifically target tumour cells (monoclonal antibodies directed against CD30, CCR4 or CD158k) and the further development of "small" molecules such as histone deacetylase inhibitors and new cytostatics. Immunotherapies, which have proven so effective in other areas of oncodermatology, are also of great interest, while allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation has clearly shown its superiority over autologous transplantation and now constitutes a significant component of the therapeutic arsenal in advanced disease. While the innovations in terms of B-cell lymphomas are certainly less significant, mention must also be made of the value of rituximab combined with polychemotherapy (CHOP) and of lenalidomide (as second-line therapy) in primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type, along with the development of localized (very) low-dose radiotherapy in unilesional or paucilesional indolent forms.

Time to next treatment (TTNT) is an emerging endpoint in clinical studies of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL), with utility as a surrogate marker for the “duration of clinical benefit”. TTNT provides a highly clinically meaningful endpoint that uniquely reflects not only the duration of treatment efficacy on disease and symptom control, but also incorporates the patient experience by accounting for patient compliance and tolerance to the studied therapy(s). Given the distinct challenges of pin-pointing the exact date of progression in patients with multi-compartmental CTCL, TTNT overcomes many of the shortcomings of conventional, disease-focused, clinical endpoints in primary CTCL research. Although widely accepted in clinical research for numerous other incurable malignancies, TTNT currently lacks a standardised definition. In this paper, we describe the value of TTNT as a clinical endpoint, review the applications of TTNT in primary CTCL research, and propose a standardised definition of TTNT to be applied in future clinical research of primary CTCL therapies.

Primary cutaneous lymphomas are currently classified by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) classification or the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, but both systems have shortcomings. In particular, differences in the classification of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas other than mycosis fungoides, Sezary syndrome, and the group of primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders and the classification and terminology of different types of cutaneous B-cell lymphomas have resulted in considerable debate and confusion. During recent consensus meetings representatives of both systems reached agreement on a new classification, which is now called the WHO-EORTC classification. In this paper we describe the characteristic features of the different primary cutaneous lymphomas and other hematologic neoplasms frequently presenting in the skin, and discuss differences with the previous classification schemes. In addition, the relative frequency and survival data of 1905 patients with primary cutaneous lymphomas derived from Dutch and Austrian registries for primary cutaneous lymphomas are presented to illustrate the clinical significance of this new classification.

We report a case of a woman with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Primary cutaneous lymphomas (PCLs) represent distinct clinical and histopathologic subtypes of extranodal T- and B-cell lymphomas. Cutaneous B-cell lymphomas comprise 20–25% of all primary cutaneous lymphomas. The patient presented an erythematous tumour mass of the left nasolabial fold, nose and left cheek as well as disseminated infiltrative plagues on the trunk, arms and left lower leg. Skin biopsy revealed a diffuse infiltrate of lymphocytes around hair follicles and blood vessels within dermis and subcutaneous tissue. An immunohistochemistry showed a diffuse infiltrate of large non-cleaved B-cells, with a high proportion of centroblast-like cells within dermis. Tumor cells expressed CD20, bcl-2 protein and did not express CD10. The patient was misdiagnosed as the erysipelas of the face and unsuccessfully treated with long-term antibiotic therapy by a laryngologist and a dermatologist. The correct diagnosis was delayed and established after 6 months’ history of DLBCL lesions. Therefore, we would like to strongly stress the importance of considering diagnosis of cutaneous lymphomas in chronic skin lesions non-responsive to adequate therapies.

Background: Nonmycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome (non-MF/SS) primary cutaneous lymphomas (PCL) are currently categorized under the 2005-World Health Organization/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (WHO-EORTC) classification for PCL. These differ in behavior from secondary cutaneous lymphomas (SCL) and to lymphomas limited to the oral cavity (primary oral lymphomas [POL]) both categorized under the 2016-WHO classification for lymphoid neoplasms. Aims: This study aims to report the first series of non-MF/SS PCL, SCL, and POL in a Mexican cohort, examine the applicability of current classification systems and compare our findings with those from foreign cohorts. Materials and Methods: Eighteen non-MF/SS PCL, four SCL, and two POL with available tissue for morphology and immunophenotypic assessment were reclassified according to the 2005-WHO/EORTC and 2016-WHO classifications. Results: Non-MF/SS PCLs were primarily of T-cell origin (61%) where CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders predominated, followed by Epstein–Barr virus-induced lymphomas, and peripheral T-cell lymphomas, not otherwise specified. Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (BCL) were primarily of follicle center cell origin followed by postgerminal lymphomas of the diffuse large BCL variety. Conclusions: Most non-MF/SS PCL, SCL, and POL can be adequately categorized according to the 2005-WHO/EORTC and 2016-WHO classification systems, even when dealing with clinically atypical cases. The relative frequencies in our cohort hold closer similarities to Asian registries than from those of Europe/USA, supporting the concept of individual and/or racial susceptibility, and the notion of geographical variances in the rate of lymphomas. In particular, such disparity may arise from viral-induced lymphomas which might show partial geographical restriction.