Search

Chiglitazar (Carfloglitazar) is a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) pan-agonist that has shown promising effects on glycemic control and lipid regulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. In this randomized phase 3 trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of chiglitazar with sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes who had insufficient glycemic control despite a strict diet and exercise regimen. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive chiglitazar 32 mg (n = 245), chiglitazar 48 mg (n = 246), or sitagliptin 100 mg (n = 248) once daily for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in glycosylated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) from baseline at week 24 with the non-inferiority of chiglitazar over sitagliptin. Both chiglitazar and sitagliptin significantly reduced HbA1c at week 24 with values of −1.40%, −1.47%, and −1.39% for chiglitazar 32 mg, chiglitazar 48 mg, and sitagliptin 100 mg, respectively. Chiglitazar 32 and 48 mg were both non-inferior to sitagliptin 100 mg, with mean differences of −0.04% (95% confidential interval (CI) −0.22 to 0.15) and −0.08% (95% CI −0.27 to 0.10), respectively. Compared with sitagliptin, greater reduction in fasting and 2-h postprandial plasma glucose and fasting insulin was observed with chiglitazar. Overall adverse event rates were similar between the groups. A small increase in mild edema in the chiglitazar 48 mg group and slight weight gain in both chiglitazar groups were reported. The overall results demonstrated that chiglitazar possesses good efficacy and safety profile in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with lifestyle interventions, thereby providing adequate supporting evidence for using this PPAR pan-agonist as a treatment option for type 2 diabetes.

Chiglitazar (Carfloglitazar) is a novel non-thiazolidinedione (TZD) structured peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) pan-agonist that has shown promising effects on glycemic control and lipid regulation in patients with type 2 diabetes in previous clinical studies. This randomized phase 3 trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of chiglitazar with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes with insufficient glycemic control by strict diet and exercise alone. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive chiglitazar 32 mg (n = 167), chiglitazar 48 mg (n = 166), or placebo (n = 202) once daily. The primary endpoint was the change in glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at week 24 with superiority of chiglitazar over placebo. The results showed that both chiglitazar 32 and 48 mg resulted in significant and clinically meaningful reductions in HbA1c, and placebo-adjusted estimated treatment differences at week 24 for chiglitazar 32 and 48 mg were −0.87% (95% confidential interval (CI): −1.10 to −0.65; P

A new optimization algorithm is proposed, since a huge problem that many algorithms faced was not being able to effectively balance the global and local search ability. Matter exists in three states: solid, liquid, and gas, which presents different motion characteristics. Inspired by multi- states of matter, individuals of optimization algorithm have different motion characteristics of matter, which could present different search ability. The Finite Element Analysis (FEA) approach can simulate multi- states of matter, which can be adopted to effectively balance the global search ability and local search ability in new optimization algorithm. The new algorithm is creative application of Finite Element Analysis at optimization algorithm field. Artificial Physics Optimization (APO) and Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) belongs to the algorithm types defined by force and mass. According to FEA approach, node displacement caused by force and stiffness could be equivalent to motion caused by force and mass of APO and GSA. In the new algorithm framework, stiffness replaces mass of APO and GSA algorithm. This paper performs research on two different algorithms based on APO and GSA respectively. The individuals of new optimization algorithm are divided into solid state, liquid state, and gas state. The effects of main parameters on the performance were studied through experiments of 6 static test functions. The performance is compared with PSO, basic APO, or GSA for four complex models which made up of solid individual, liquid individual, and gas individual in iterative process. The reasonable complex model can be confirmed experimentally. Based on the reasonable complex model, the article conducted complete experiments against Enhancing artificial bee colony algorithm with multi-elite guidance (MGABC), Artificial bee colony algorithm with an adaptive greedy position update strategy (AABC), Multi-strategy ensemble artificial bee colony (MEABC), Self-adaptive heterogeneous PSO (fk-PSO), and APO with 28 CEC2013 test problem. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves a good performance in comparison to its counterparts as a consequence of its better exploration– exploitation balance. The algorithm supplies a new method to improve physics optimization algorithm.

Objective Chidamide is an oral histone deacetylase subtype-selective inhibitor approved for relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). This phase 1b study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of chidamide in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) for treatment-naive PTCL patients. Methods This study was an open-label, multicenter trial composed of dose escalation and dose expansion. Patients received CHOP for six 21-d cycles and chidamide on d 1, 4, 8 and 11 in each cycle. Four dose levels of chidamide (20, 25, 30 and 35 mg) were evaluated. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combination regimen. Results A total of 30 patients were evaluated in this study: 15 in the dose-escalation part and 15 in the dose-expansion part. In the dose-escalation study, three patients were enrolled in the 35 mg chidamide cohort. One had dose-limiting toxicity with grade 3 vascular access complications, and one had grade 2 neutropenia with a sustained temperature >38 °C. Dose escalation was stopped at this chidamide dose level. The most common (≥10%) grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) were leukopenia (90.0%), neutropenia (83.3%), vomiting (13.3%), thrombocytopenia (10.0%) and febrile neutropenia (10.0%). No significant changes in chidamide pharmacokinetic properties were observed before and after combination treatment. The objective response rate for the 28 patients evaluable for preliminary efficacy was 89.3% (25/28), with 16 (57.1%) achieving complete response or unconfirmed complete response. The estimated median progression-free survival was 14.0 months. In summary, we chose chidamide 30 mg as the recommended dose for phase 2. Conclusions The addition of chidamide to standard CHOP chemotherapy was tolerable with promising preliminary efficacy in previously untreated PTCL patients, which supports further clinical studies with this combination regimen for the frontline treatment of PTCL.

Aiming at the problem that many algorithms could not effectively balance the global search ability and local search ability, a new optimization algorithm is proposed. Inspired by Finite Element Analysis (FEA) approach, a relationship of mapping between Finite Element Analysis approach and a population-based optimization algorithm is constructed through comparing the similarities and differences of FEA node and ideal particle. In algorithm framework, the stiffness coefficient corresponds to a user-defined function of the value of an objective function to be optimized, and the node forces among individuals are defined and an attraction-repulsion rule is established among them. The FEA approach that can simulate multi- states of matter is adopted to balance the global search ability and local search ability in the novel optimization algorithm. A theoretical analysis is made for algorithm parallelism. The conditions for convergence are deduced through analyzing the algorithm based on discrete-time linear system theory. In addition, the performance of the algorithm is compared with PSO for five states which include free state, diffusion state, solid state, entirely solid state, synthesis state. The simulation results of six benchmark functions show that the algorithm is effective. The algorithm supplies a new method to solve optimization problem.

Objective The recurrence or progression under endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) remained a critical clinical challenge. Chidamide is an oral subtype-selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with multiple functions in tumor growth inhibition and microenvironment modulation via epigenetic reprogramming. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary efficacy of chidamide in combination with exemestane in HR+ ABC patients. Methods Eligible patients were postmenopausal women with HR+ ABC recurrent or progressed to at least one endocrine therapy. Blood samples were obtained in the run-in period and the first day of combination treatment for PK analysis. In combination treatment, patients were given exemestane 25 mg daily and chidamide 30 mg twice a week (BIW) until progression of disease or intolerable toxicities. A treatment cycle was defined as 4 weeks. Safety, PK parameters, and preliminary efficacy were evaluated. Results A total of 20 patients were enrolled between July and December, 2015. The median number of treatments cycle was 5.2 (20.8 weeks) with 2 patients still on treatment at the data cut-off date of October, 2017. The treatment-related adverse events (AE) ≥ grade 3 in more than 2 patients were neutropenia (35%), thrombocytopenia (30%), and leucopenia (20%). The plasma exposure of exemestane was consistent in the presence or absence of chidamide. A slight increase in chidamide exposure was noted in the presence of exemestane, probably due to the inter- and intra-patient variations. The best response in 16 evaluable patients was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), including 4 patients with partial response, 10 patients with stable disease. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.6 months. Conclusions The combination of chidamide with exemestane was generally well tolerated with promising preliminary efficacy in HR+ ABC patients. The overall results from this study encourage further pivotal trial in this patient population.

Chiglitazar, a novel PPARα/γ/δ pan-agonist, showed favorable effects on glycemic control and lipid modulation with well tolerated safety profile in phase 2 trials. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of chiglitazar with DPP-4 inhibitor sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with diet and exercise (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02173457). Patients were randomly assigned to receive chiglitazar 32 mg or 48 mg, or sitagliptin 100 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline at week 24, with a non-inferiority of each chiglitazar dose versus sitagliptin. Analysis was done in all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (n=739). Chiglitazar showed comparable HbA1c lowering effect compared with sitagliptin at 24 weeks (LS mean difference -0.04% [95% CI -0.22 to 0.15] and -0.08% [95% CI -0.27 to 0.10] for 32 mg and 48 mg, respectively), along with different trends in secondary endpoints. Overall adverse events were comparable across study groups. The incidences of weight gain and edema were generally low but relatively higher in chiglitazar 48 mg. In conclusion, chiglitazar showed non-inferior effect compared with sitagliptin on HbA1c reduction with well tolerated safety profile. Disclosure W. Jia: None. J. Ma: None. H. Miao: None. C. Wang: None. X. Wang: None. Q. Li: None. W. Lu: None. J. Yang: None. L. Zhang: None. J. Yang: None. G. Wang: None. X. Zhang: None. M. Zhang: None. L. Sun: None. X. Yu: None. J. Du: None. B. Shi: None. C. Xiao: None. D. Zhu: None. H. Liu: None. L. Zhong: None. C. Xu: None. Q. Xu: None. G. Liang: None. Y. Zhang: None. G. Li: None. M. Gu: None. J. Liu: None. Z. Ning: None. L. Ji: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca. Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck KGaA, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk A/S, Roche Pharma, Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis AG, Roche Pharma, Sanofi. Funding Ministry of Science and Technology of the People´s Republic of China (2013ZX09401301)

Chiglitazar showed favorable effect on glycemic control and lipid modulation with well tolerated safety profile in phase 2 trials. This trial aimed to further compare the efficacy and safety of chiglitazar with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with lifestyle interventions (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02121717). Patients were randomly assigned to receive chiglitazar 32 mg or 48 mg, or placebo once daily. After 24-week treatment, patients in placebo group were randomly assigned to receive chiglitazar 32 mg or 48 mg, while others remained on the planned treatment till to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c at week 24 with superiority of each chiglitazar dose versus placebo. Analysis was done in all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (n= 535). Chiglitazar was superior to placebo in HbA1c reduction at 24 weeks (LS mean difference -0.87% [95% CI -1.10 to -0.65] and -1.05% [95% CI -1.29 to -0.81] for 32 mg and 48 mg, respectively) and achieved sustainable effect till to 52 weeks. Overall adverse events were comparable across groups. The incidences of weight gain, edema, and hypoglycemia were relatively higher in chiglitazar groups. Chiglitazar showed superior and sustainable HbA1c lowering effect with well tolerated safety profile in patients with type 2 diabetes. Disclosure L. Ji: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca. Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck KGaA, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk A/S, Roche Pharma, Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis AG, Roche Pharma, Sanofi. W. Song: None. H. Fang: None. W. Li: None. J. Geng: None. Y. Xu: None. Y. Wang: None. L. Guo: None. H. Cai: None. T. Yang: None. H. Li: None. G. Yang: None. Q. Li: None. K. Liu: None. S. Li: None. Y. Liu: None. F. Shi: None. X. Li: None. X. Gao: None. Q. Ji: None. H. Tian: None. Q. Su: None. Z. Zhou: None. W. Wang: None. Z. Zhou: None. X. Li: None. Y. Xu: None. Z. Ning: None. X. Lu: None. W. Jia: None. Funding Ministry of Science and Technology of the People´s Republic of China (2013ZX09401301)

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a representative autoimmune disease characterized by chronic inflammation and joint destruction. Although biological inhibitors such as TNF-α and IL-6 antibodies have achieved success in clinical therapy, small molecule inhibitors against the Janus kinases (JAKs) involved in the signaling pathways of various cytokine receptors have gained more attraction as safe and efficacious options. In this study, we identified CS12192 as a novel selective JAK3/JAK1/TBK1 inhibitor and investigated its pharmacological effects on the experimental arthritis models in rat and mouse. We found that CS12192 showed a more selective inhibitory activity on JAK3, and to a less extent on JAK1 and TBK1, that were verified by decreased activation of p-STATs and p-IRF3 as well as down-regulation of IFN gene expression in the cultured cells with relevant stimuli. Furthermore, oral treatment with CS12192 dose-dependently ameliorated the disease severity, hind paw swelling, body weight loss, and bone destruction in rat models of adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) and collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). In a mouse CIA model, CS12192 also attenuated the disease severity, which was correlated with the suppressed CD4+ T cell activation and Th17 function, as well as the reduced cytokine levels in sera and pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine gene expression in joint tissue. Corroboratively, RANKL-induced osteoclast formation was inhibited by CS12192. Thus, these results suggest that CS12192 as a novel selective JAK inhibitor has therapeutic potential for the treatment of RA and may provide a new strategy for the control of autoimmune diseases.

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are functional components of the human genome. Recent studies have demonstrated that lncRNAs play essential roles in tumorigenesis, and are involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion in several types of tumor, including lung cancer. However, the clinical relevance of lncRNA expression in lung cancer remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression pattern of RFPL3 antisense (RFPL3S) and its associations with clinicopathological characteristics in patients with lung cancer. Whether RFPL3S can act as a potential prognostic biomarker for lung cancer was also investigated. RFPL3S expression in tumor samples and cells was assessed using the Oncomine database and the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, respectively. Based on Kaplan-Meier Plotter analyses, the prognostic values of RFPL3S were further evaluated. It was revealed that RFPL3S was highly expressed in lung cancer tissues when compared with normal tissues and was significantly associated with pN factor, pTNM stage and Ki-67 labeling index. In the survival analyses, increased RFPL3S expression was associated with poor survival and was inversely associated with first progression in all patients. These results indicate that RFPL3S may be of clinical significance and may act as a prognostic biomarker in lung cancer.

Tucidinostat (formerly known as chidamide) is an oral subtype-selective histone deacetylase inhibitor. In an exploratory study, the combination of tucidinostat with exemestane showed preliminary signs of encouraging anti-tumour activity in patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. To build on these findings, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of this combination in a randomised trial in a larger population of postmenopausal patients with advanced, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.We did the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 ACE trial at 22 specialist cancer centres in China. Eligible patients were postmenopausal women (aged ≥60 years or aged60 years if their serum follicle-stimulating hormone and oestradiol concentrations were within postmenopausal ranges) with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, whose disease had relapsed or progressed after at least one endocrine therapy (either in advanced or metastatic or adjuvant setting), and who had at least one measurable lesion, adequate organ function, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, and adequate haematological and biochemical parameters. Endocrine therapy did not have to be the most recent therapy before randomisation, but recurrence or progression after the most recent therapy was a prerequisite. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) by a dynamic randomisation scheme via an interactive web-response system to receive 30 mg oral tucidinostat or placebo twice weekly. All patients in both groups also received 25 mg oral exemestane daily. Randomisation was stratified according to the presence of visceral metastases (yes vs no). Patients, investigators, study site staff, and the sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Efficacy analyses were done in the full analysis set population, comprising all patients who received at least one dose of any study treatment, and safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of any study treatment and for whom at least one safety case report form was available. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02482753. The study has reached the required number of events for final analysis of the primary endpoint. The trial is no longer enrolling patients, but follow-up for investigation of overall survival is ongoing.Between July 20, 2015, and June 26, 2017, 365 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, 244 to the tucidinostat group and 121 to the placebo group. The median duration of follow-up was 13·9 months (IQR 9·8-17·5). Investigator-assessed median progression-free survival was 7·4 months (95% CI 5·5-9·2) in the tucidinostat group and 3·8 months (3·7-5·5) in the placebo group (HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·58-0·98]; p=0·033). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events in either group were neutropenia (124 [51%] of 244 patients in the tucidinostat group vs three [2%] of 121 patients in the placebo group), thrombocytopenia (67 [27%] vs three [2%]), and leucopenia (46 [19%] vs three [2%]). Serious adverse events of any cause occurred in 51 (21%) of 244 patients in the tucidinostat group and seven (6%) of 121 patients in the placebo group. No treatment-related deaths were reported.Tucidinostat plus exemestane improved progression-free survival compared with placebo plus exemestane in patients with advanced, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer that progressed after previous endocrine therapy. Grade 3-4 haematological adverse events were more common in the tucidinostat plus exemestane group than in the placebo plus exemestane group. Tucidinostat plus exemestane could represent a new treatment option for these patients.Chipscreen Biosciences.

Background Chiauranib is a novel orally active multi-target inhibitor that simultaneously inhibits the angiogenesis-related kinases (VEGFR2, VEGFR1, VEGFR3, PDGFRα, and c-Kit), mitosis-related kinase Aurora B, and chronic inflammation-related kinase CSF-1R. This phase I dose-escalation study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of chiauranib in patients with refractory advanced solid tumor and lymphoma. Methods Eighteen patients were treated with continuous dosing of chiauranib from 10 to 65 mg once daily in a dose-escalation 3 + 3 design and evaluated in 28-day cycles. Pharmacokinetic profile of plasma chiauranib was analyzed in both single and multiple dose studies. Results Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) as of grade 3 hypertension occurred in two patients at 65 mg/day, and one dose level below as MTD was 50 mg/day. The most common treatment-related adverse events included fatigue (61.1%), proteinuria (44.4%), hematuria (38.9%), hypothyroidism (38.9%), hypertriglyceridemia (33.3%), and hypertension (33.3%). A linear and dose-dependent pharmacokinetic profile of chiauranib was characterized with rapid absorption and slow elimination feature in both single and multiple dose studies. The accumulative exposure of chiauranib reached the steady state within 8 days and was approximately increased by twofold as those in the single dose study. No complete or partial response was observed, and 12 patients (66.7%) achieved stable disease (SD). Conclusions Chiauranib demonstrated an acceptable safety and favorable pharmacokinetic profile with potential antitumor activity. Several phase Ib/II clinical studies are currently under further investigation. Trial registration NCT, NCT02122809. Registered 25 April 2014

Background: Chidamide is an oral subtype-selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that demonstrated encouraging anti-tumour activity when combined with exemestane in hormone-receptor (HR)-positive advanced breast cancer patients. The current study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of chidamide plus exemestane in postmenopausal patients with advanced, HR-positive breast cancer. Methods: In this phase 3 trial, we compared chidamide and exemestane versus placebo and exemestane in 365 postmenopausal patients (randomised as a 2:1 ratio) with HR-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer who had relapsed or progressed after previous endocrine therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival, as assessed by the investigators. Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response, clinical benefit rate, and safety. Findings: The median progression-free survival on the basis of investigator assessment was 7·4 months (95% CI 5·5-9·2) in the chidamide group versus 3·8 months (95% CI 3·7-5·5) in the placebo group (HR 0·75, 95% CI 0·58-0·98; p=0.034). The median progression-free survival was 9.2 months and 3.8 months, respectively, according to central assessment (HR 0·71, 95% CI 0·53-0·96; p=0.024). Objective response rates were 18% and 9% (p=0·026), and clinical benefit rates were 47% and 36% (p=0·034) in the chidamide group and placebo group, respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the chidamide group were neutropenia (51% vs. 3% in the placebo group), thrombocytopenia (27% vs. 3%), and leucopenia (19% vs. 3%). Serious adverse events occurred in 51 (21%) patients in the chidamide group and 7 (6%) patients in the placebo group. No treatment related death was reported. Interpretation: This is the first phase 3 trial to demonstrate that a selective HDAC inhibitor plus endocrine blockade improves progression-free survival in patients with HR-positive advanced breast cancer progressing after prior endocrine therapy. Trial Registration Number: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02482753. Funding: Chipscreen Biosciences Declaration of Interest: ZN and XP are employees of Chipscreen Biosciences Ltd. The other authors declare no competing interests. Ethical Approval: The Ethics Committee at each participating centre approved the study which was conducted in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice, the Declaration of Helsinki and the regulations of China.

Background: Chiglitazar is a novel PPARα/γ/δ pan-agonist with moderate transcriptional activities. Phase 2 studies demonstrated that chiglitazar had significant effects on glycemic control and lipid modulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. The current CMAP study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of chiglitazar compared with placebo in type 2 diabetes patients who had not previously received anti-diabetic treatment. Methods: This study was a double-blind and placebo-controlled phase 3 trial conducted at 26 centres in China. Eligible patients were 18-70 years old, type 2 diabetes with HbA1c ≥7*5% and ≤10*0% and without previous anti-diabetic treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to receive chiglitazar 32 mg or 48 mg, or placebo once daily. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c at week 24 with superiority of chiglitazar to placebo. Findings: Between June 17, 2014, and Oct 13, 2016, 535 patients were randomly assigned to receive chiglitazar 32 mg (n=167), 48 mg (n=166), or placebo (n=202). In the primary LOCF analysis in the full-analysispopulation, both chiglitazar doses were superior to placebo for HbA1c reduction at week 24, with the mean differences between chiglitazar 32 mg or 48 mg versus placebo were -0*87% [95% CI -1*10 to -0*65] or -1*05% [- 1*29 to -0*81], respectively. Overall frequency of adverse events and study discontinuation attributable to adverse events were similar among groups. Serious adverse events were reported for seven (3%) in the placebo group, four (2%) in the chiglitazar 32 mg group, and eight (5%) in the chiglitazar 48 mg group. A small increased mild edema events and body weight gain was reported in the chiglitazar dose groups. Interpretation: The PPAR pan-agonist chiglitazar had significant and clinically relevant improvements in glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, with no unexpected safety findings. Trial Registration: This study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov number NCT02121717. Funding Statement: Chipscreen Biosciences. This study was partly supported by grants from Chinese National and Provincial Major Project for New Drug Innovation (National: 2008ZX09101-002, 2013ZX09401301; Provincial: 2011A080501010) and Shenzhen Municipal Major Project (2010-1746). Declaration of Interests: ZN, HC, DP, HY and XL are employees of Chipscreen Biosciences Ltd. The other authors declare no competing interests. Ethics Approval Statement: The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and was approved by institutional review boards and independent ethics committees for participating centers. All participants provided written informed consent.

// Zhi-Qiang Ning 1, * , Hai-lin Lu 1, * , Chao Chen 1, * , Lin Wang 2, * , Wei Cai 1 , Yan Li 1 , Ting-hua Cao 1 , Jing Zhu 1 , Yong-Qian Shu 3, 4 , Hua Shen 3, 4 1 Department of Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Wujiang District, Suzhou, 215200, China 2 Institute of Medcine, University of Zhengzhou, Henan Province, 450000, China 3 Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029, China 4 Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu Province, China * These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Hua Shen, email: medshenhua@126.com Yong-Qian Shu, email: shuyongqian1999@126.com Keywords: miRNA-30e, chemosensitivity, gefitinib, HOXA1, lung cancer Received: May 28, 2016 Accepted: December 06, 2016 Published: December 15, 2016 ABSTRACT MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play critical roles in variousbiological processes,including malignancy. Here, we demonstrated that miR-30e levels were markedly reduced in human lung carcinoma specimens in comparisonwith adjacent normal tissues.In addition, miR-30eamounts were starkly lower in the resistant PC9/gefitinib (PC9G) cancer cells compared with PC9 cells. Meanwhile, miR-30eoverexpression inPC9G cells resulted in reduced cell proliferation and migration,reversing drug resistance to gefitinib.Conversely,miR-30e silencing in PC9 cells increased proliferation as well as migration, and conferred resistance to gefitinib.Moreover, HOXA1, which was identified asa new miR-30etarget, plays important roles in regulating cell fate, early developmental patterns and organogenesis.Importantly, miR-30ealso inhibited PC9G growth in vivo . Taken together, these findings demonstrated that miR-30eshould be considered a tumor suppressor miRNA, which could be used in treatinghuman lung cancer.

Solid rationales are still present for the identification of synthetic ligands to simultaneously target multiple PPAR subtypes for the treatment of T2DM. The purpose of this study was to characterize thein vitroandin vivodifferential effects of chiglitazar, a non-TZD type of PPAR pan-agonist currently in phase III clinic development in China, from PPARγ-selective agonist like rosiglitazone. Chiglitazar showed transactivating activity in each PPARα,γ, andδsubtype and upregulated the expression of PPARαand/or PPARδdownstream genes involved in the key processes of lipid metabolism and thermogenesis. Comparable blood glucose lowering effect was observed between chiglitazar and rosiglitazone, but chiglitazar did not significantly increase the body weight in KKAy and fat pad weight indb/dbmice. Chiglitazar had high distribution in liver, pancreas, and skeleton muscles but was less present in kidney, heart, and adipose in rats. Heart weight increase was not observed in rats treated with chiglitazar for 6 months at a dose as high as 45 mg kg−1. Thein vitroandin vivodifferential features of chiglitazar are informative and encouraging for the further development of this synthetic ligand for the potential use in T2DM.

e12543 Background: Chidamide (CHI) is a novel benzamide type of subtype-selective histone deacetylase inhibitor approved in China for refractory and relapsed peripheral T-cell lymphoma with a dosage of 30 mg PO twice a week. A randomized, double blind and placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial of CHI plus exemestane (EXE) is currently ongoing in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer (ABC). This abstract reports the results from the pilot study preceded the phase 3 trial. Methods: Eligible pts were postmenopausal women recurrent or progressed to at least one endocrine therapy. In the run-in period for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis, pts received EXE 25 mg on day (D) 1 and CHI 30 mg on D 2. From D 5 pts started combination treatment having EXE 25 mg daily and CHI 30 mg twice a week until progression of disease (PD) or intolerable toxicities. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 days. Safety, PK parameters and preliminary efficacy were assessed. Results: 20 pts with HR+ and HER-2 negative were enrolled between Jul and Dec, 2015. Median duration of treatment was 5 cycles (range 0-16), with 4 pts still on treatment. 3 pts discontinued due to adverse events (AE). Drug-related AEs ≥ grade 3 in 2 or more pts were neutropenia (35%), thrombocytopenia (30%), and leucopenia (20%). Similar plasma exposure of EXE was observed in the absence and presence of CHI ( 73 ± 27 vs. 80 ± 29 ng·hr/mL). A potential increased plasma exposure of CHI was noted in the presence of EXE compared with CHI alone ( 2232 ± 973 vs 1787 ± 946 ng·hr/mL), apparently related to the inter-patient variations in CHI plasma concentrations. Best response in 18 pts was assessed by RECIST, including 3 pts with partial response, 12 pts with stable disease and 3 pts with PD. Median progression free survival was 7.6 months. Conclusions: The combination of CHI and EXE was generally well tolerated. Most AEs were related to the CHI single-agent treatment that are generally manageable. Encouraging antitumor activity was observed. The overall results from this pilot trial enabled the next-stage clinical development of this combination regimen in HR+ ABC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02482753.