1. Can standardized measures provide helpful feedback about adult protective services substantiation? Pilot data from a short self-neglect assessment
- Author
-
Zachary Hass, Sara Stratton, Pi-Ju Liu, and Kendon J. Conrad
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Formative Feedback ,Health Services for the Aged ,Exploratory research ,Standardized test ,Elder Abuse ,Severity of Illness Index ,Consistency (negotiation) ,medicine ,Humans ,Self-Neglect ,Adult Protective Services ,Aged ,business.industry ,Communication ,ComputerSystemsOrganization_COMPUTER-COMMUNICATIONNETWORKS ,Reproducibility of Results ,Elder abuse ,medicine.disease ,Female ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,business ,Psychology ,Social Welfare ,Social Sciences (miscellaneous) ,Self-neglect ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
Can standardized assessment contribute to improving Adult Protective Services (APS) practice? In this exploratory study, San Francisco and Napa APS utilized a newly developed short self-neglect assessment to test how standardized measures provide information for substantiation decision making. Findings demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity for the short self-neglect assessment, and analyses revealed important issues that could improve practice. Review of outliers revealed: (1) problems using the assessment tool, (2) misunderstandings of APS procedures, and (3) struggles navigating the case management system. These revelations could all be easily addressed in training. Caseworker's clinical judgment and experience also continue to have a place in complementing the use of the standardized assessment.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF