1. Two-stage strategy for neglected Monteggia fracture in children: A retrospective study of 51 patients
- Author
-
Pan Hong, Yuhong Ding, Saroj Rai, Qi Zhang, Ruikang Liu, Jin Li, Xiaolong Zhao, Xin Tang, and Renhao Ze
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,External Fixators ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Elbow ,Observational Study ,Ulna ,Monteggia fracture ,Osteotomy ,Time-to-Treatment ,Monteggia's Fracture ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Elbow Joint ,medicine ,Deformity ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Range of Motion, Articular ,radial head dislocation ,Child ,Retrospective Studies ,annular ligament reconstruction ,business.industry ,Retrospective cohort study ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Open Fracture Reduction ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Treatment Outcome ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Concomitant ,Child, Preschool ,Ligaments, Articular ,Ligament ,Feasibility Studies ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,Range of motion ,business ,Elbow Injuries ,ulnar osteotomy ,Research Article - Abstract
A neglected Monteggia fracture is defined as the fracture of the proximal ulna associated with radial head dislocation (RHD) without undergoing any treatment for 4 weeks or more after injury. One-stage operation of ulnar corrective osteotomy and open reduction of RHD might result in many complications. Therefore, a two-stage strategy, including ulnar osteotomy (UO) with or without annular ligament reconstruction (ALR), was adopted at our institute since 2010. We performed a retrospective review of 51 patients with neglected Monteggia fracture between January 2010 and January 2018. Patients with bilateral problems or concomitant injuries in the ipsilateral extremity were excluded. Radiological and clinical data were collected from Hospital Database and clinical visits. All patients were divided into 2 groups based on the status of the ALR: the UO alone (UO) group and the ALR group. There were 15 patients in the UO group and 36 patients in the ALR group. The age in the UO group (6.1 ± 2.3, year) was significantly younger than the ALR group (9.8 ± 2.8, year) (P
- Published
- 2020