Search

Your search keyword '"Valerio De Peppo"' showing total 5 results
Start Over Author "Valerio De Peppo" Topic business
5 results on '"Valerio De Peppo"'

1. Curative versus palliative treatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentric weighted comparison

Author

Simone Famularo, Matteo Donadon, Federica Cipriani, Davide P. Bernasconi, Giuliano LaBarba, Tommaso Dominioni, Maurizio Iaria, Sarah Molfino, Simone Conci, Cecilia Ferrari, Marco Garatti, Antonella Delvecchio, Albert Troci, Stefan Patauner, Silvia Frassani, Maurizio Cosimelli, Giacomo Zanus, Felice Giuliante, Elio Jovine, Maria G. Valsecchi, GianLuca Grazi, Adelmo Antonucci, Antonio Frena, Michele Crespi, Riccardo Memeo, Giuseppe Zimmitti, Guido Griseri, Andrea Ruzzenente, Gianluca Baiocchi, Raffaele DallaValle, Marcello Maestri, Giorgio Ercolani, Luca Aldrighetti, Guido Torzilli, Fabrizio Romano, Cristina Ciulli, Alessandro Giani, Francesca Carissimi, Guido Costa, Francesca Ratti, Alessandro Cucchetti, Francesco Calabrese, Elena Cremaschi, Giovanni Lazzari, Angelo Franceschi, Valentina Sega, Maria Conticchio, Luca Pennacchi, Michele Ciola, Ivano Sciannamea, Valerio De Peppo, Famularo S., Donadon M., Cipriani F., Bernasconi D.P., LaBarba G., Dominioni T., Iaria M., Molfino S., Conci S., Ferrari C., Garatti M., Delvecchio A., Troci A., Patauner S., Frassani S., Cosimelli M., Zanus G., Giuliante F., Jovine E., Valsecchi M.G., Grazi G., Antonucci A., Frena A., Crespi M., Memeo R., Zimmitti G., Griseri G., Ruzzenente A., Baiocchi G., DallaValle R., Maestri M., Ercolani G., Aldrighetti L., Torzilli G., Romano F., Ciulli C., Giani A., Carissimi F., Costa G., Ratti F., Cucchetti A., Calabrese F., Cremaschi E., Lazzari G., Franceschi A., Sega V., Conticchio M., Pennacchi L., Ciola M., Sciannamea I., De Peppo V., Famularo, Simone, Donadon, Matteo, Cipriani, Federica, Bernasconi, Davide P, Labarba, Giuliano, Dominioni, Tommaso, Iaria, Maurizio, Molfino, Sarah, Conci, Simone, Ferrari, Cecilia, Garatti, Marco, Delvecchio, Antonella, Troci, Albert, Patauner, Stefan, Frassani, Silvia, Cosimelli, Maurizio, Zanus, Giacomo, Giuliante, Felice, Jovine, Elio, Valsecchi, Maria G, Grazi, Gianluca, Antonucci, Adelmo, Frena, Antonio, Crespi, Michele, Memeo, Riccardo, Zimmitti, Giuseppe, Griseri, Guido, Ruzzenente, Andrea, Baiocchi, Gianluca, Dallavalle, Raffaele, Maestri, Marcello, Ercolani, Giorgio, Aldrighetti, Luca, Torzilli, Guido, and Romano, Fabrizio

Subjects
Sorafenib, medicine.medical_specialty, recurrence, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Tumor burden, 030230 surgery, liver, Gastroenterology, NO, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, hepatectomy, Retrospective Studie, Internal medicine, Humans, Medicine, Chemoembolization, Therapeutic, Liver surgery, Retrospective Studies, LS7_4, Hepatology, business.industry, Palliative Care, Liver Neoplasms, hepatocellular carcinoma, medicine.disease, Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma, multicentric, Treatment Outcome, Time to recurrence, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Liver function, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, business, medicine.drug, Human
Abstract

Background Management of recurrence after surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) is still a debate. The aim was to compare the Survival after Recurrence (SAR) of curative (surgery or thermoablation) versus palliative (TACE or Sorafenib) treatments for patients with rHCC. Methods This is a multicentric Italian study, which collected data between 2007 and 2018 from 16 centers. Selected patients were then divided according to treatment allocation in Curative (CUR) or Palliative (PAL) Group. Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) was used to weight the groups. Results 1,560 patients were evaluated, of which 421 experienced recurrence and were then eligible: 156 in CUR group and 256 in PAL group. Tumor burden and liver function were weighted by IPW, and two pseudo-population were obtained (CUR = 397.5 and PAL = 415.38). SAR rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were respectively 98.3%, 76.7%, 63.8% for CUR and 91.7%, 64.2% and 48.9% for PAL (p = 0.007). Median DFS was 43 months (95%CI = 32-74) for CUR group, while it was 23 months (95%CI = 18-27) for PAL (p = 0.017). Being treated by palliative approach (HR = 1.75; 95%CI = 1.14–2.67; p = 0.01) and having a median size of the recurrent nodule>5 cm (HR = 1.875; 95%CI = 1.22–2.86; p = 0.004) were the only predictors of mortality after recurrence, while time to recurrence was the only protective factor (HR = 0.616; 95%CI = 0.54–0.69; p Conclusion Curative approaches may guarantee long-term survival in case of recurrence.

Published
2021

2. Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: What Are the Advantages in Patients with Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Personal Experience

Author

Diego Coletta, Valerio De Peppo, Cristina De Padua, Claudia Frigieri, Andrea Oddi, Gian Luca Grazi, and Chiara Parrino

Subjects
Laparoscopic surgery, robotic, Liver Cirrhosis, medicine.medical_specialty, Cirrhosis, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, medicine.medical_treatment, Operative Time, Blood Loss, Surgical, NO, Hypertension, Portal, medicine, Hepatectomy, Humans, In patient, Blood Transfusion, laparoscopy, liver surgery, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatectomy, Laparoscopy, Aged, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Liver Neoplasms, laparoscopy, robotic, liver surgery, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatectomy, food and beverages, Ascites, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, digestive system diseases, Surgery, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Meta-analysis, Portal hypertension, business
Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic surgery is a choice of treatment for liver diseases; it can decrease postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay (LOS). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients w...

Published
2020

3. Performance of comprehensive complication index and clavien‐dindo complication scoring system in liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma

Author

Valentina Sega, Francesca Ratti, Daniele Nicolini, Giorgio Ercolani, Michele Crespi, Matteo Donadon, Valerio De Peppo, Nadia Russolillo, Antonio Floridi, Matteo Zanello, Luca Pennacchi, Marcello Maestri, Mauro Montuori, Ivano Sciannamea, Cristina Ciulli, Mario Giuffrida, Mauro Zago, A. Frena, Felice Giuliante, Albert Troci, Luca Fumagalli, Valentina Ferraro, Giovanni Lazzari, Marco Chiarelli, Sarah Molfino, Simone Famularo, Andrea Ruzzenente, Alessandro Cucchetti, Giuseppe Zimmitti, Raffaele Dalla Valle, Davide Paolo Bernasconi, Paola Tarchi, Maurizio Romano, Massimo Rossi, Alessandro Giani, Luca Gianotti, Luca Salvador, Enrico Pinotti, Davide Cosola, Fabrizio Romano, Marco Braga, Luca Aldrighetti, Giuliano La Barba, Federico Fazio, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Alessandro Ferrero, Elena Cremaschi, Francesco Razionale, Federica Cipriani, Guido Torzilli, A. Antonucci, Alberto Manzoni, Cecilia Ferrari, Pasquale Perri, Stefan Patauner, Laura Marinelli, Francesco Ardito, Gian Luca Grazi, Simone Conci, Paola Germani, Nicholas Pontarolo, Giacomo Zanus, Quirino Lai, Michele Ciola, Guido Costa, Marco Vivarelli, Zoe Larghi Laureiro, Elio Jovine, Francesco Calabrese, Andrea Percivale, Riccardo Memeo, Michele Tedeschi, Pietro Calcagno, Angelo Franceschi, Giani A., Cipriani F., Famularo S., Donadon M., Bernasconi D.P., Ardito F., Fazio F., Nicolini D., Perri P., Giuffrida M., Pontarolo N., Zanello M., Lai Q., Conci S., Molfino S., Germani P., Pinotti E., Romano M., La Barba G., Ferrari C., Patauner S., Manzoni A., Sciannamea I., Fumagalli L., Troci A., Ferraro V., Floridi A., Memeo R., Crespi M., Chiarelli M., Antonucci A., Zimmitti G., Frena A., Percivale A., Ercolani G., Zanus G., Zago M., Tarchi P., Baiocchi G.L., Ruzzenente A., Rossi M., Jovine E., Maestri M., Valle R.D., Grazi G.L., Vivarelli M., Ferrero A., Giuliante F., Torzilli G., Aldrighetti L., Gianotti L., Romano F., Ciulli C., Braga M., Ratti F., Costa G., Razionale F., Russolillo N., Marinelli L., De Peppo V., Cremaschi E., Calabrese F., Laureiro Z.L., Lazzari G., Cosola D., Montuori M., Salvador L., Cucchetti A., Franceschi A., Ciola M., Sega V., Calcagno P., Pennacchi L., Tedeschi M., Giani, A, Cipriani, F, Famularo, S, Donadon, M, Bernasconi, D, Ardito, F, Fazio, F, Nicolini, D, Perri, P, Giuffrida, M, Pontarolo, N, Zanello, M, Lai, Q, Conci, S, Molfino, S, Germani, P, Pinotti, E, Romano, M, La Barba, G, Ferrari, C, Patauner, S, Manzoni, A, Sciannamea, I, Fumagalli, L, Troci, A, Ferraro, V, Floridi, A, Memeo, R, Crespi, M, Chiarelli, M, Antonucci, A, Zimmitti, G, Frena, A, Percivale, A, Ercolani, G, Zanus, G, Zago, M, Tarchi, P, Baiocchi, G, Ruzzenente, A, Rossi, M, Jovine, E, Maestri, M, Valle, R, Grazi, G, Vivarelli, M, Ferrero, A, Giuliante, F, Torzilli, G, Aldrighetti, L, Gianotti, L, Romano, F, Ciulli, C, Braga, M, Ratti, F, Costa, G, Razionale, F, Russolillo, N, Marinelli, L, De Peppo, V, Cremaschi, E, Calabrese, F, Laureiro, Z, Lazzari, G, Cosola, D, Montuori, M, Salvador, L, Cucchetti, A, Franceschi, A, Ciola, M, Sega, V, Calcagno, P, Pennacchi, L, Tedeschi, M, Giani, A., Cipriani, F., Famularo, S., Donadon, M., Bernasconi, D. P., Ardito, F., Fazio, F., Nicolini, D., Perri, P., Giuffrida, M., Pontarolo, N., Zanello, M., Lai, Q., Conci, S., Molfino, S., Germani, P., Pinotti, E., Romano, M., La Barba, G., Ferrari, C., Patauner, S., Manzoni, A., Sciannamea, I., Fumagalli, L., Troci, A., Ferraro, V., Floridi, A., Memeo, R., Crespi, M., Chiarelli, M., Antonucci, A., Zimmitti, G., Frena, A., Percivale, A., Ercolani, G., Zanus, G., Zago, M., Tarchi, P., Baiocchi, G. L., Ruzzenente, A., Rossi, M., Jovine, E., Maestri, M., Valle, R. D., Grazi, G. L., Vivarelli, M., Ferrero, A., Giuliante, F., Torzilli, G., Aldrighetti, L., Gianotti, L., Romano, F., Ciulli, C., Braga, M., Ratti, F., Costa, G., Razionale, F., Russolillo, N., Marinelli, L., De Peppo, V., Cremaschi, E., Calabrese, F., Laureiro, Z. L., Lazzari, G., Cosola, D., Montuori, M., Salvador, L., Cucchetti, A., Franceschi, A., Ciola, M., Sega, V., Calcagno, P., Pennacchi, L., and Tedeschi, M.

Subjects
Liver surgery, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Percentile, Clavien-Dindo Classification, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Settore MED/18 - CHIRURGIA GENERALE, Performance, Logistic regression, lcsh:RC254-282, Article, NO, Clavien‐Dindo classification, Comprehensive complication index, Length of stay, Morbidity, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Clavien-Dindo classification, Medicine, Derivation, LS7_4, business.industry, Odds ratio, lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, medicine.disease, Surgery, Oncology, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology, business, Complication
Abstract

Background: We aimed to assess the ability of comprehensive complication index (CCI) and Clavien-Dindo complication (CDC) scale to predict excessive length of hospital stay (e-LOS) in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: Patients were identified from an Italian multi-institutional database and randomly selected to be included in either a derivation or validation set. Multivariate logistic regression models and ROC curve analysis including either CCI or CDC as predictors of e-LOS were fitted to compare predictive performance. E-LOS was defined as a LOS longer than the 75th percentile among patients with at least one complication. Results: A total of 2669 patients were analyzed (1345 for derivation and 1324 for validation). The odds ratio (OR) was 5.590 (95%CI 4.201, 7.438) for CCI and 5.507 (4.152, 7.304) for CDC. The AUC was 0.964 for CCI and 0.893 for CDC in the derivation set and 0.962 vs. 0.890 in the validation set, respectively. In patients with at least two complications, the OR was 2.793 (1.896, 4.115) for CCI and 2.439 (1.666, 3.570) for CDC with an AUC of 0.850 and 0.673, respectively in the derivation cohort. The AUC was 0.806 for CCI and 0.658 for CDC in the validation set. Conclusions: When reporting postoperative morbidity in liver surgery, CCI is a preferable scale.

Published
2020

4. Robotic Liver Resections: Application of Difficulty Score Systems to an Initial Experience. Is a Specific Robotic Difficulty Score Necessary?

Author

Paolo Ossola, Marco D'Annibale, Valerio De Peppo, Diego Coletta, Chiara Parrino, Pasquale Perri, Gian Luca Grazi, Andrea Oddi, Coletta, Diego, Ossola, Paolo, Parrino, Chiara, Oddi, Andrea, D'Annibale, Marco, Perri, Pasquale, De Peppo, Valerio, and Grazi, Gian Luca

Subjects
Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Liver resections, NO, Body Mass Index, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Robotic Surgical Procedures, robotic surgery, medicine, difficulty score, liver resection, minimally invasive surgery, Hepatectomy, Humans, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Robotic surgery, LS7_4, Aged, Surgical approach, PE7_10, business.industry, technology, industry, and agriculture, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Surgery, body regions, surgical procedures, operative, Liver, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Preoperative Period, 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology, Female, Laparoscopy, business, human activities
Abstract

Background: Recently, the minimally invasive surgical approach has been available for performing liver resections (LRs) with laparoscopic and robotic techniques. The robotic approach for LRs seems to overcome several laparoscopic limitations, which is a valid alternative when performed in high volume and specialized centers. Laparoscopic difficulty score systems (DSSs) should serve to guide the surgeon's choice in the best surgical approach to adopt for every single patient, giving the possibility to switch to the open approach when needed. To this day, no specific robotic difficulty scores exist. The aim of our study was to verify the feasibility of applying these scores and related updates on robotic LRs performed in our Institute.Materials and Methods: Out of a total of 683 LRs performed from June 2010 to July 2019, 60 were performed through using a mini invasive approach and of these 18 were performed robotically. The Ban DSS and subsequently the modified Iwate DSS were applied to our cases.Results: Based on our findings, applying the DSS we divided our series into two groups: a low difficulty level group (1-3) made up of 5 patients, and an intermediate difficulty level group (4-6) consisting of 13 patients. Average Ban DSS and subsequently updated score system results were 4.6 +/- 1.5 points (range 2-6) for both scores.Conclusions: Difficulties were encountered in applying the score when simultaneous multiple wedge resections were performed. The laparoscopic DSS is applicable to robotic LRs with some limitations due to the peculiarity of the two different minimally invasive approaches. A specific robotic difficulty rating score could be necessary to include these elements.

Published
2020

5. Organ-saving surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: Analysis of failures and long-term results

Author

Maurizio Cosimelli, Pietro Ursi, Valerio De Peppo, Andrea Balla, G. Pattaro, Raffaello Mancini, Chiara Parrino, Pasquale Perri, Gian Luca Grazi, Maria Grazia Diodoro, Cosimelli M., Ursi P., Mancini R., Pattaro G., Perri P., Parrino C., De Peppo V., Diodoro M.G., Balla A., and Grazi G.L.

Subjects
Local excision, medicine.medical_specialty, Colorectal cancer, medicine.medical_treatment, macromolecular substances, NO, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, medicine, Radical surgery, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, rectal cancer, Mesorectal, LS7_4, Chemotherapy, transanal local excision, business.industry, organ-saving surgery, General Medicine, Long term results, medicine.disease, Total mesorectal excision, Surgery, stomatognathic diseases, Oncology, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Adenocarcinoma, 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology, business
Abstract

Background: To analyze long-term results and risk of relapse in the clinical TNM stages II and III, mid-low rectal cancer patients (RC pts), treated with transanal local excision (LE) after major response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (n-CRT). Methods: Thirty-two out of 345 extraperitoneal cT3–4 or N+ RC pts (9.3%) underwent LE. Inclusion criteria: extraperitoneal RC, adenocarcinoma, ECOG Performance Status ≤2. Pts with distant metastases were excluded. Results: All pts showed histologically clear margins of resection and 81.2% were restaged ypT0/mic/1. Nine out of 32 (28.1%) pts relapsed: 7 (21.8%) showed a local recurrence, of which 5 (15.6%) at the endorectal suture, 1 (3.1%) pelvic and 1 (3.1%) mesorectal. Two pts (6.2%) relapsed distantly. Among the pT0/1, 11.5% relapsed vs 100% of the pT2 and pT4 ones. The six pts relapsing locally or in the mesorectal fat underwent a salvage total mesorectal excision surgery. The old patient with pelvic recurrence relapsed after 108 months and underwent a re-irradiation; the two pts with distant metastases were treated with chemotherapy followed by radical surgery. Conclusions: Presently combined approach seems a valid option in major responders, confirming its potential curative impact in the ypT0/mic/1 pts. A strict selection of pts is basic to obtain favourable results.

Published
2019

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results