Search

Introduction Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent disorder associated with increased cardiovascular risks. We explored the predictive value of OSA screening instruments in cardiac disease patients awaiting cardiac surgery. Methods In this prospective cohort, 107 participants awaiting cardiac surgery from Cleveland Clinic and Johns Hopkins underwent polysomnography after completing Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Sleep Apnea/Sleep Disorder Questionnaire (SA/SDQ), STOP, STOPBAG2 and Berlin questionnaires. Score comparisons between groups based on apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15 were performed. Logistic regression with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to investigate optimal threshold. Results Prevalence of OSA (AHI ≥5) was 71.9% (77/107) and 51 (47.7%) had moderate-to-severe disease (AHI ≥15). Participants were primarily male (57%) and Caucasian (76.6%). Mean age was 67.3 ± 13.3 years and BMI was 26.5 ± 6.6. Of the five screening tools, STOPBAG2 with a cut-point of 0.381 provided 78% sensitivity and 38% specificity (AUC 0.66, 95%CI 0.55–0.77). SA/SDQ yielded a cut-point of 32 for all subjects (AUC: 0.62, 95%CI 0.51–0.73) with sensitivity and specificity of 60% and 62% respectively, while STOP score ≥2 provided sensitivity and specificity of 67% and 52% respectively (AUC: 0.61, 95%CI 0.51–0.72). Among STOP items, “observed apnea” had the strongest correlation with AHI ≥15 (OR 3.67, 95%CI 1.57–8.54, p = 0.003). The ESS and Berlin were not useful in identifying moderate-to-severe OSA. Conclusion Common screening tools had suboptimal performance in cardiac surgery patients. STOPBAG2 was better at predicting the probability of moderate-to-severe OSA in patients undergoing cardiac surgery compared to ESS, SA/SDQ, STOP and Berlin questionnaires.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We examined the performance of a simple algorithm to accurately distinguish cases of diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and noncases using the electronic health record (EHR) across six health systems in the United States. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of EHR data was performed. The algorithm defined cases as individuals with ≥ 2 instances of specific International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and/or ICD-10 diagnostic codes (327.20, 327.23, 327.29, 780.51, 780.53, 780.57, G4730, G4733 and G4739) related to sleep apnea on separate dates in their EHR. Noncases were defined by the absence of these codes. Using chart reviews on 120 cases and 100 noncases at each site (n = 1,320 total), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. RESULTS: The algorithm showed excellent performance across sites, with a PPV (95% confidence interval) of 97.1 (95.6, 98.2) and NPV of 95.5 (93.5, 97.0). Similar performance was seen at each site, with all NPV and PPV estimates ≥ 90% apart from a somewhat lower PPV of 87.5 (80.2, 92.8) at one site. A modified algorithm of ≥ 3 instances improved PPV to 94.9 (88.5, 98.3) at this site, but excluded an additional 18.3% of cases. Thus, performance may be further improved by requiring additional codes, but this reduces the number of determinate cases. CONCLUSIONS: A simple EHR-based case-identification algorithm for diagnosed OSA showed excellent predictive characteristics in a multisite sample from the United States. Future analyses should be performed to understand the effect of undiagnosed disease in EHR-defined noncases. This algorithm has wide-ranging applications for EHR-based OSA research. CITATION: Keenan BT, Kirchner HL, Veatch OJ, et al. Multisite validation of a simple electronic health record algorithm for identifying diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2020;16(2):175–183.

Background Confirmation of match between patient and blood product remains a manual process in most operating rooms (ORs), and documentation of dual-signature verification remains paper based in most medical institutions. A sentinel event at Johns Hopkins Hospital in which a seriously ill patient undergoing an emergent surgical procedure was transfused with a unit of incompatible red blood cells that had been intended for another patient in an adjacent OR led the hospital to conduct a quality improvement project to improve the safety of intraoperative blood component transfusions. Methods A multidisciplinary quality improvement project team led a four-phase implementation of bedside bar code transfusion verification (BBTV) for intraoperative blood product administration. Manual random sample audits of blood component transfusions were used to examine accuracy of documentation from July 2014 through June 2016. After the transition to the Epic anesthesia information management system (AIMS) in July 2016, automated Epic reports were generated to provide population-level audits. Results After initiation of BBTV and the addition of Epic AIMS, compliance with obtaining three metrics on documentation of patient identification (two electronic signatures, start and stop times of transfusion, and blood volume transfused) was improved during a one-year period to > 96%. Pre-Epic audits had shown a mean compliance of only 86%, mainly reflecting a lack of paper blood component requisitions. Conclusion By implementing BBTV and using a novel intraoperative documentation process within the Epic AIMS, a safer process of blood transfusion in the ORs was initiated and documentation improved.

Purpose:The American Society of Anesthesia practice guidelines recommend that pediatric and adult patients who undergo ambulatory surgery be screened for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). With this in...

Healthcare increasingly is moving from volume- to value-based care, with an emphasis on linking a larger percentage of payments to the quality of care provided. There is a renewed interest in designing a focused, strategic approach to quality and safety education and engagement of trainees in hospital-wide quality, safety, and patient experience initiatives. Hospitals, trainees, and patients benefit as a result of engaging frontline learners in these activities. Hospitals can leverage the intelligence from the front line to contribute to improved hospital safety, increased employee and patient engagement, and better identification of vulnerable areas of safety risks. Trainees benefit from increased engagement by acquiring fundamentals in quality and safety; are able to satisfy Clinical Learning Environment Review recommendations; have an opportunity to practice a number of skill sets (leadership, communication, collaboration); and complete quality and safety hands-on projects. Patients benefit from a more engaged work force, safer environment for their healthcare, and an improved overall experience. In this article, the current state of the Johns Hopkins Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine's efforts to engage its front line in quality, safety, and patient experience initiatives that are in evolutionary phases of implementation is presented. Evolutionary concepts relate to the Johns Hopkins Health System and the aim of its training program to continuously improve and innovate.

Upper airway patency, during periods of sleep and anesthesia, is an area of study gaining interest in many fields of medicine. Disturbances in ventilatory control thatoccurduringvariousstagesof sleepand anesthesia are well recognized. These alterations can involve the upper airway, leading to increases in upper airway collapsibility and airflow obstruction. Comorbid conditions including obesity, craniofacial disorders, and Down syndrome as well as the administration of respiratory depressants markedly increase the individual’s susceptibility to upper airway obstruction. These conditions are known risk factors for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), a chronic condition that is characterized by recurrent episodes of pharyngeal obstruction with ensuing oxyhemoglobin desaturations and arousals from sleep. Furthermore, anesthetic and sedative agents can precipitate upper airway obstruction acutely in the perioperative period, leading to potentially catastrophic respiratory complications, especially in patients undergoing upper airway surgery. Regardless of the clinical setting

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., The purpose of the Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine guideline on preoperative screening and assessment of adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is to present recommendations based on the available clinical evidence on the topic where possible. As very few well-performed randomized studies in this field of perioperative care are available, most of the recommendations were developed by experts in the field through consensus processes involving utilization of evidence grading to indicate the level of evidence upon which recommendations were based. This guideline may not be appropriate for all clinical situations and all patients. The decision whether to follow these recommendations must be made by a responsible physician on an individual basis. Protocols should be developed by individual institutions taking into account the patients’ conditions, extent of interventions and available resources. This practice guideline is not intended to define standards of care or represent absolute requirements for patient care. The adherence to these guidelines cannot in any way guarantee successful outcomes and is rather meant to help individuals and institutions formulate plans to better deal with the challenges posed by perioperative patients with OSA. These recommendations reflect the current state of knowledge and its interpretation by a group of experts in the field at the time of publication. While these guidelines will be periodically updated, new information that becomes available between updates should be taken into account. Deviations in practice from guidelines may be justifiable and such deviations should not be interpreted as a basis for claims of negligence.

Study Objectives:The aims of this study were to: (a) assess the prevalence of diagnosed OSA and symptoms of undiagnosed OSA in a cohort of ambulatory surgical patients, and (b) characterize the fre...

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is increasingly being used as a sedative for monitored anesthesia care (MAC) because of its analgesic properties, "cooperative sedation," and lack of respiratory depression. In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind, Phase III Food and Drug Administration study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of two doses of DEX for sedation of patients undergoing a broad range of surgical or diagnostic procedures requiring MAC.Three hundred twenty-six patients were randomized 2:2:1 to DEX 0.5 microg/kg, DEX 1 microg/kg, or saline placebo initial loading dose, followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.2-1.0 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) of DEX (or equivalent volume of saline) titrated to a targeted level of sedation (or = 4 on the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale [OAA/S]). Study drug was started at least 15 min before placement of regional or local anesthetic block. Midazolam was given for OAA/S4 and fentanyl for pain. The primary end-point was the percentage of patients not requiring rescue midazolam.Significantly fewer patients in the 0.5- and 1-microg/kg DEX groups required supplemental midazolam compared with placebo (59.7% [80/134], 45.7% [59/129] vs 96.8% [61/63], respectively; P0.001) and at lower doses to achieve an OAA/Sor = 4 before and during surgery compared with the saline group (1.4 and 0.9 mg vs 4.1 mg, respectively; P0.001, each group compared with placebo). Both DEX groups required significantly less fentanyl (84.8 and 83.6 microg vs 144.4 microg, respectively; P0.001, for both DEX groups versus placebo) for all surgical subtypes. Anesthesiologists indicated significantly increased ease of achieving and maintaining targeted sedation in both DEX groups compared with placebo with midazolam (P0.001). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher with DEX (Por = 0.009, both groups versus placebo). Common adverse events with DEX were protocol-defined bradycardia and hypotension that were predominately mild to moderate in severity. The incidence of clinically significant respiratory depression (defined as a respiratory rate of8 or an oxygen saturation of90%) was lower in DEX-treated patients (P = 0.018, for both groups versus placebo).DEX is an effective baseline sedative for patients undergoing MAC for a broad range of surgical procedures providing better patient satisfaction, less opioid requirements, and less respiratory depression than placebo rescued with midazolam and fentanyl.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent condition in the general population. However, a majority of individuals with moderate to severe OSA remain undiagnosed. The polysomnogram (PSG) remains the standard test used in the diagnosis of OSA. However, the time, labor, and costs associated with PSG preclude its widespread use as a routine preoperative screening tool. Increased awareness of signs and symptoms associated with OSA and more standardized methods for screening for the condition may help decrease the disparity between prevalence and diagnosis. The authors discuss polysomnography, breathing disorders associated with sleep, signs and symptoms associated with OSA, and associated co-morbidities.

Study Objectives:We examined the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among patients undergoing cardiac surgery and its impact on postoperative outcomes.Methods:Subjects were recruited from ...

To evaluate the effect of sedation depth on drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).Ninety patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and 18 snorers underwent polysomnography and DISE under bispectral index (BIS)-guided propofol infusion at two different sedation levels: BIS 65-75 (light sedation) and 50-60 (deep sedation).For the patients with OSA, the percentages of velopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx obstructions under light sedation were 77.8%, 63.3%, 30%, and 33.3%, respectively. Sedation depth was associated with the severity of velopharynx and oropharynx obstruction, oropharynx obstruction pattern, tongue base obstruction, epiglottis anteroposterior prolapse and folding, and arytenoid prolapse. In comparison, OSA severity was associated with the severity of velopharynx obstruction, severity of oropharynx obstruction, and arytenoid prolapse (odds ratio (95% confidence interval); 14.3 (4.7-43.4), 11.7 (4.2-32.9), and 13.2 (2.8-62.3), respectively). A good agreement was noted between similar DISE findings at different times and different observers (kappa value 0.6 to 1, respectively). A high percentage of arytenoid prolapse (46.7% among the patients with OSA under light sedation) was noted.Greater sedative depth increased upper airway collapsibility under DISE assessment. DISE under BIS-guided propofol infusion, and especially a level of 65-75, offers an objective and reproducible method to evaluate upper airway collapsibility. Some findings were induced by drug sedation and need careful interpretation. Specific arytenoid prolapse patterns were noted for which further investigations are warranted.http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT01100554.A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 965.

Data suggest that surgical patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may be difficult to ventilate and intubate, and may be prone to postoperative complications. This article addresses the identification of patients at risk for OSA, epidemiology of the disorder, and treatment options, as well as the perioperative management of this population.

This article reviews the terminology of obstructive sleep apnea and the associated diagnostic tests and provides an overview of the risk factors for this chronic condition. Sleep apnea affects 2% to 4% of middle-aged working adults in the general population, however, a considerable number of affected individuals remain undiagnosed. Patients with the disease may be at a higher risk for adverse perioperative outcomes. Knowledge of factors associated with an increased risk of obstructive sleep apnea is vital to the perioperative assessment and anesthetic plan.

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a disorder of airway obstruction with multisystem implications and associated complications. OSAS affects children from infancy to adulthood and is responsible for behavioral, cognitive, and growth impairment as well as cardiovascular and perioperative respiratory morbidity and mortality. OSAS is associated commonly with comorbid conditions, including obesity and asthma. Adenotonsillectomy is the most commonly used treatment option for OSAS in childhood, but efforts are underway to identify medical treatment options.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been historically underdiagnosed and may be associated with grave perioperative complications. The ASA and American Academy of Sleep Medicine recommend OSA screening prior to surgery; however, only a minority of patients are screened. The objective of this study was to determine the proficiency of anesthesiologists, otolaryngologists, and internists at predicting the presence of OSA by visual photographic analysis without the use of a computer program to assist, and determine if prediction accuracy varies by provider type.Prospective case seriesTertiary care hospital-based academic centerFifty-six consecutive patients presenting to the sleep laboratory undergoing polysomnography had frontal and lateral photographs of the face and torso taken.Not applicable.Polysomnography outcomes and physician ratings. An obstructive apnea hypopnea index (oAHI) ≥15 was considered "positive." Twenty anesthesiologists, 10 otolaryngologists, and 11 internists viewed patient photographs and scored them as OSA "positive" or "negative" before and after being informed of patient comorbidities.Nineteen patients had an oAHI15, 18 were ≥15 but30, and 19 were ≥30. The mean oAHI was 28.7 ± 26.7 events/h (range, 0-125.7), and the mean body mass index was 34.1 ± 9.7 kg/m(2) (range, 17.4-63.7). Overall, providers predicted the correct answer with 61.8% accuracy without knowledge of comorbidities and 62.6% with knowledge (P.0001). There was no difference between provider groups (P = .307). Prediction accuracy was unrelated to patient age (P = .067), gender (P = .306), or race (P = .087), but was related to body mass index (P = .0002).The ability to predict OSA based on visual inspection of frontal and lateral photographs is marginally superior to chance and did not differ by provider type. Knowledge of comorbidities did not improve prediction accuracy.

Program Description:OSA is common in surgical populations. Recent studies suggest higher risk of respiratory failure, reintubation, ICU transfer, and longer length of stay in OSA patients. This miniseminar will examine these risks from medical, surgical, and anesthesia perspectives, including an overview of the pathophysiology of this increased risk. Sleep-certified specialists will discuss anesthesia and patient factors contributing to perioperative risk, measures to reduce this risk, and considerations unique to the pediatric population. Finally, the miniseminar will provide practical information for developing a system-wide preoperative screening protocol and implementing clinical pathways to evaluate and manage OSA patients in the perioperative period.Educational Objectives:1) Explain the specific surgical and anesthesia risks in patients with OSA and the pathophysiology of the increased risk. 2) Review preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative strategies that can be employed to reduce complicat...

Objective To identify baseline patient characteristics associated with increased susceptibility to surgical site infection (SSI) after elective surgery. Background The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services considers SSI to be preventable through adherence to current infection control practices; however, the etiology of wound infection is incompletely understood. Methods Prospective cohort study involving patients undergoing cardiac, vascular, craniotomy, and spinal surgery at 2 academic medical centers in Baltimore, MD. A comprehensive medical history was obtained at baseline, and participants were followed for 6 months using active inpatient and outpatient surveillance for deep SSI and infectious death. Infection control best practices were monitored perioperatively. The relative risk of SSI/infectious death was determined comparing those with versus those without a past medical history of skin infection using Cox proportional hazards models. Results Of 613 patients (mean [SD] = 62.3 [11.5] years; 42.1% women), 22.0% reported a history of skin infection. The cumulative incidence of deep SSI/infectious death was 6.7% versus 3.1% for those with and without a history of skin infection, respectively (unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 2.25; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.98-5.14; P = 0.055). Risk estimates increased after adjustments for demographic and socioeconomic variables (HR = 2.82; 95% CI, 1.18-6.74; P = 0.019) and after propensity score adjustment for all potential confounders (HR = 3.41; 95% CI, 1.36-8.59; P = 0.009). Adjustments for intraoperative infection risk factors and adherence to infection control best practice metrics had no impact on risk estimates. Conclusions A history of skin infection identified a state of enhanced susceptibility to SSI at baseline that is independent of traditional SSI risk factors and adherence to current infection control practices.

To assess whether obesity is associated with mortality or other adverse intensive care unit (ICU) and post-ICU outcomes. A meta-analysis of studies from PubMed and EMBASE databases. Twenty-two studies (n = 88,051 patients) were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated no difference in ICU mortality, but lower hospital mortality for obese and morbidly obese subjects (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59, 0.92; RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.66, 1.04, respectively) versus normal weight subjects. There was no association between obesity and duration of mechanical ventilation or ICU stay. Morbidly obese versus normal weight patients had longer hospitalizations. No study reported physical function, mental health, or quality of life outcomes after discharge. Obesity is not associated with increased risk for ICU mortality, but may be associated with lower hospital mortality. There is a critical lack of research on how obesity may affect complications of critical illness and patient long-term outcomes.

Objective To evaluate the validity of preoperative cardiac stress testing using clinical predictors from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines on Perioperative Evaluation before Noncardiac Surgery in patients undergoing vascular surgery. Design Prospective, randomized pilot study. Setting Academic medical center. Participants Patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic, infrainguinal, and carotid vascular surgery. Interventions After stratification by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Guideline parameters, 99 patients were randomized to preoperative cardiac stress testing or to no stress testing and followed for up to 12 months postoperatively for adverse cardiac outcomes. Measurements and main results Before hospital discharge of 46 patients who underwent preoperative stress testing, 7 (15%) had inducible ischemia with no adverse postoperative cardiac outcomes, whereas only 1 (3%) of 39 patients (85%) with no ischemia had a nonfatal adverse cardiac outcome (p = not significant). Of 53 patients without preoperative stress testing, only 2 (4%) had a nonfatal adverse postoperative cardiac outcome. There were no cardiac deaths. At 12-month follow-up in 79 (80%) patients, there was 1 nonfatal adverse cardiac outcome (no stress test) and 1 cardiac death (abnormal stress test), reflecting a 1% 12-month cardiac morbidity and mortality. Conclusion In this small prospective, randomized study evaluating the validity of preoperative cardiac stress testing using ACC/AHA Guidelines before major vascular surgery, preoperative cardiac stress testing offered no incremental value for determining postoperative adverse cardiac outcomes. Larger randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

An increasing number of surgical procedures are now performed on an ambulatory basis. This article reviews these conditions and defines the appropriate preoperative evaluation and perioperative management. Our goal is to define those patients who would benefit in having care in an inpatient setting or those who require more intensive medical evaluation or preparation prior to outpatient surgery.