Search

Objective We evaluated the modified diagnostic criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), which was published by the Japanese Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (JSTH), in 274 suspected DIC patients with hematopoietic injury. Materials and methods The diagnoses of the patients were as follows: DIC (n = 125); pre-DIC (n = 42) and non-DIC (n = 107). The efficacy of the diagnostic criteria for DIC was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results The area under the curve (ARC) and odd's ratio for the global coagulation test (GCT) scores in the diagnosis of “DIC” were high, while those for the diagnosis of “DIC and pre-DIC” were low, suggesting that the addition of antithrombin (AT) and soluble fibrin (SF)/thrombin antithrobin complex (TAT) was required to diagnose “DIC and pre-DIC”. Although the addition of the AT and SF/TAT values to the GCT did not increase its ability to predict a poor outcome, the JSTH's modified diagnostic criteria scores were correlated with the odds ratio for death. Discussion and conclusion The JSTH's modified diagnostic criteria for DIC, which included the GCT score, and the AT, and TAT/SF values, were useful for diagnosing DIC and pre-DIC, and predicting a poor outcome.

Efficacy of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM), which is frequently used to treat patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), was compared with that of gabexate mesilate (GM), which was previously used routinely in the treatment of DIC patients in Japan. Although there was no significant difference in the resolution rates of the patients who were treated with rhTM and GM, the results of our analysis revealed that the mortality rate was significantly higher among infectious disease patients treated with GM than in those treated with rhTM. Levels of fibrinogen and fibrin degradation products (FDP), antithrombin (AT) activity, and thrombin AT complex (TAT) were significantly lower in the DIC patients with infectious diseases, while fibrinogen levels were high. FDP level, D-dimer, platelet count, PT ratio, and DIC score all showed significant improvement following rhTM treatment. There were no significant difference between survivors and non-survivors in terms of DIC score, FDP level, platelet count, AT activity, or in TAT, SF and PPIC levels before rhTM treatment. However, fibrinogen levels were significantly lower in non-survivors than in survivors. These results indicate that rhTM may be superior to GM for the treatment of DIC.

Prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is important in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. Although the detection of an elevated D-dimer level is useful for predicting DVT, it is not efficacious in postoperative patients being treated with anti-Xa agents. The soluble platelet glycoprotein VI (sGPVI) level is a marker of activated platelets, but not bleeding. Therefore, sGPVI levels are usually examined as a predictor of DVT in such patients. In the present study, 83 orthopedic patients were treated with 30 mg of edoxaban for prophylaxis of DVT. Fourteen patients developed DVT and 17 patients discontinued the prophylaxis due to decreased hemoglobin levels. Plasma levels of sGPVI in the patients were significantly higher after surgery than before surgery. On day 1, the sGPVI levels increased, while the platelet counts decreased. There were no significant differences in D-dimer, soluble fibrin, or FDP levels in orthopedic patients with and without DVT before surgery and on days 1, 4, and 8. Plasma sGPVI levels were significantly higher in the patients with DVT than in those without DVT on days 1 and 4. Plasma levels of D-dimer were significantly higher in patients with withdrawal than in those without. However, there were no significant differences in sGPVI levels between those with and without withdrawal. As D-dimer levels are known to increase in patients with withdrawal, this parameter is not useful for evaluating the risk of DVT in these patients. In contrast, the sGPVI level is not increased in those with withdrawal and may therefore be useful for evaluating the risk of DVT in postoperative patients treated with an anticoagulant.

We evaluated the diagnostic criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), which was published by the Japanese Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (JSTH), in 232 patients with suspected DIC without hematopoietic injury or infection. The diagnoses of the patients were as follows: DIC (n = 116), pre-DIC (n = 54), and non-DIC (n = 63). The efficacy of the diagnostic criteria for DIC was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic analysis. The area under the curve and odds ratio for the global coagulation test (GCT) scores in the diagnosis of “DIC” were high, whereas those for the diagnosis of “DIC and pre-DIC” were low, suggesting that the addition of a reduced platelet count (RPC), antithrombin (AT), and soluble fibrin (SF)/thrombin AT (TAT) complex was required to diagnose DIC and pre-DIC. When the GCT score with the RPC, AT, and TAT/SF values was used, the cutoff DIC score for the diagnosis of DIC or DIC and pre-DIC was 6 points. For predicting the outcome, a scoring system that used the GCT result was useful, but the addition of RPC, AT, or SF/TAT was not. The modified diagnostic criteria of JSTH, which included the GCT score and the RPC, AT, and TAT/SF values, were useful for diagnosing both DIC and pre-DIC.

Objective: We evaluated the modified diagnostic criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), which was published by the Japanese Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (JSTH) in 108 patients with suspected infectious DIC. Material and methods: The diagnoses of the patients were as follows: DIC (n = 63), pre-DIC (n = 22), and non-DIC (n = 45). The efficacy of the diagnostic criteria for DIC was evaluated using a receiver–operating characteristic analysis. Results: Although the area under the curve for global coagulation test (GCT) scores in the diagnosis of “DIC” was high that for the diagnosis of “DIC and pre-DIC” was low, suggesting that the addition of antithrombin (AT), soluble fibrin (SF)/thrombin–AT complex (TAT), and reduced platelet count (PLT) values was required to diagnose “DIC and pre-DIC.” Using GCT score with the AT, SF/TAT, and reduced PLT values, the cutoff value of the DIC score for the diagnosis of “DIC and pre-DIC” was 5 points. Discussion and conclusion: The modified JSTH’s diagnostic criteria for DIC, which used the GCT score and the reduced PLT, AT, and TAT/SF values, were useful for diagnosing “DIC and pre-DIC.”