1. Lessons learned from value-based pediatric appendectomy care: A shared savings pilot model
- Author
-
Binita Patel, Jed G. Nuchtern, Hui Ren, Yangyang R. Yu, Charlene Barclay, Kathleen E. Carberry, Steven C. Mehl, and Monica E. Lopez
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Psychological intervention ,Pilot Projects ,Patient Readmission ,Patient satisfaction ,Case mix index ,Cost Savings ,Health care ,Appendectomy ,Humans ,Medicine ,Quality (business) ,Value-Based Health Insurance ,Child ,Baseline (configuration management) ,Diagnosis-Related Groups ,health care economics and organizations ,Reimbursement ,media_common ,business.industry ,Infant, Newborn ,Infant ,General Medicine ,Appendicitis ,Cost reduction ,Child, Preschool ,Emergency medicine ,Surgery ,business - Abstract
Purpose We aim to assess the healthcare value achieved from a shared savings program for pediatric appendectomy. Methods All appendectomy patients covered by our health plan were included. Quality targets were 15% reduction in time to surgery, length of stay, readmission rate, and patient satisfaction. Quality targets and costs for an appendectomy episode in two 6-month performance periods (PP1, PP2) were compared to baseline. Results 640 patients were included (baseline:317, PP1:167, PP2:156). No quality targets were met in PP1. Two quality targets were met during PP2: readmission rate (−57%) and patient satisfaction. No savings were realized because the cost reduction threshold (−9%) was not met during PP1 (+1.7%) or PP2 (−0.4%). Conclusions Payer-provider partnerships can be a platform for testing value-based reimbursement models. Setting achievable targets, identifying affectable quality metrics, considering case mix index, and allowing sufficient time for interventions to generate cost savings should be considered in future programs.
- Published
- 2022