Search

The aim of this study is to assess the Internet usage pattern amongst glioma patients and to characterize its impact in their decision-making and clinical interactions. Glioma patients attending a tertiary cancer center between June and December 2019 were invited to participate in this study. A 26-item survey consisting of closed and open-ended questions was distributed with a unique identifier. Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics using SPSS Statistical package, and qualitative data with grounded theory approach. Thirty-two patients completed the survey. Demographics varied in age, time since diagnosis, glioma type, and level of education. Eighty-one percent were identified as “Internet users” who sought online glioma information. Google was the most popular search engine (96%), with “glioma” being the most frequent search term. The selection of websites often relied on perceived credibility and top search hits. The most searched topic was prognosis (73%). The majority of patients found that online information was easy to understand, and this did not vary significantly amongst age groups. Website quality was always assessed by 60% of patients. Only 62% patients found the Internet a useful resource, and 70% patients found it facilitated their understanding. Most patients discussed their Internet findings with a physician, largely regarding concerns about reliability. There is variable glioma information available online. Patients with glioma use the Internet as a resource, with variable impact on their interactions and decision-making. This information can be used by physicians, educators, and website developers to support glioma patients’ needs.

Background: Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy, also known as Rosai–Dorfman disease, is a rare proliferation of non-Langerhans histiocytes. Cutaneous Rosai–Dorfman disease is a rare subtype of Rosai–Dorfman disease limited to the skin with variable clinical presentation. Case summary: A 59-year-old female with a history of osteoarthritis, hypothyroidism, and follicular B-cell lymphoma presented with pruritic, erythematous, dome-shaped papules that developed while on chemotherapy treatment. During cutaneous disease progression, the patient was further diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome. Histology review revealed patchy staining for S100 in the CD68+ histiocytes within the dermis with no enlarged histiocytes or emperipolesis. Given the absence of other findings, this was interpreted as cutaneous Rosai–Dorfman disease. Conclusion: There is still little known about the aetiology and pathogenesis of cutaneous Rosai–Dorfman disease. Non-specific immunohistochemistry in the midst of lymphoma, immunosuppressive treatments, and myelodysplastic syndrome produced a blurred diagnostic picture and delayed appropriate treatment, highlighting the diagnostic challenges of cutaneous Rosai–Dorfman disease.