1. A Novel Approach for Automated Eyelid Measurements in Blepharoptosis Using Digital Image Analysis
- Author
-
Yan Zhu, Lixia Lou, Lingling Sun, Shaoze Wang, Xin Ye, Juan Ye, Longzhao Yang, and Dahong Qian
- Subjects
Adult ,Blepharoplasty ,Male ,Adolescent ,Intraclass correlation ,Margin reflex distance ,Positive correlation ,Objective assessment ,03 medical and health sciences ,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience ,0302 clinical medicine ,Ptosis ,Photography ,medicine ,Blepharoptosis ,Humans ,Child ,Blinking ,business.industry ,Eyelids ,Infant ,Sensory Systems ,Confidence interval ,Ophthalmology ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Child, Preschool ,Digital image analysis ,030221 ophthalmology & optometry ,Female ,Eyelid ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Nuclear medicine ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Purpose: To propose a novel approach for automated measurements of margin reflex distance (MRD) using digital image analysis and to evaluate the agreement between automated and manual measurements of MRD. Materials and Methods: This observational study included 132 eyes of 66 volunteers referred to an oculoplastic clinic for blepharoptosis. Preoperative facial photographs of participants were taken. MRD1 and MRD2 were measured manually by a senior surgeon and automatically by our image-based algorithm. Correlation analyses and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to evaluate the agreement between the two measurements. Results: A strong positive correlation was observed between automated and manual MRD1 measurements, with Spearman's r = 0.968 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.949-0.976; P < .001) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.966 (95% CI = 0.953-0.976; P < .001). The bias between automated and manual MRD1 measurements was 0.02 mm (95% CI = -0.06-0.10 mm), with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) = -0.88 to 0.92 mm. Agreement also existed in MRD2 measurements, with Spearman's r = 0.803 (95% CI = 0.716-0.865; P < .001), ICC = 0.833 (95% CI = 0.772-0.879; P < .001), and bias = 0.34 mm (95% CI = 0.26-0.42 mm), 95% LoA = -0.54 to 1.22 mm. Conclusions: Automated eyelid measurements in blepharoptosis using the image-based approach compare favorably with clinical manual measurements. This novel approach allows an objective assessment of ptosis with high accuracy.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF