Search

Systematic performance trials have been conducted in several states for more than 20 yr to evaluate agronomic performance of annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.). Despite development and testing of many annual ryegrass cultivars, the first improved cultivar, Gulf, has remained one of 10 to 12 cultivars recommended for planting in the southeastern USA. Our objectives were to evaluate cultivar yield performance across 12 yr at five locations, to assess cultivar yield distribution within growing seasons, and to estimate cultivar yield stability (consistency of relative performance environments). Efficacy measures were early-season yield (total before 1 March), late-season yield (total after 1 March), and total annual yield. Overall means for all cultivars and individual cultivar performance (for common years) were compared with Gulf or Marshall. Neither location effects nor cultivar X location interactions were found. Cultivar and year effects, plus cultivar X year interactions were detected (P < 0.05) for all three yield responses. Mean early season yields ranged from 2.3 to 4.6 Mg [ha.sup.-1], with mean late-season yields ranging from 5.1 to 7.4 Mg [ha.sup.-1]. No trend existed for mean total yield relative to Gulf or Marshall to increase over time in association with availability of newer cultivars. Given large yearly fluctuation in yields, it is apparent that unpredictable environmental factors, including climate and perhaps pests, are the primary determinants of annual ryegrass performance rather than differences in yield potential among cultivars. Thus, yield stability may be an appropriate selection factor to include among the criteria for development of improved annual ryegrass cultivars., DURING THE PAST 50 YR, annual ryegrass has become an important cool-season forage plant in the southeastern USA. The development of the first improved cultivar for the region, Gulf annual [...]

Differences among annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) cultivars for weight gain of grazing steers have been reported, even though plot experiments suggest that forage dry matter yield among cultivars should not be a limiting factor. Likewise, forage nutritive value differences among cultivars have not been assessed. The objectives of this research were to evaluate differences in cumulative forage yield, yield distribution, and nutritive value among `Gulf', `Jackson', `Marshall', `Rio', `Rustmaster', and `Surrey' annual ryegrass. Plots were harvested six times beginning in December at approximate 30-d intervals during the 1997-1998 and 1998-1999 growing seasons. Nutritive value measurements included crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), in vitro true digestibility (IVTD), and digestible NDF (DNDF). There were no differences among cultivars for cumulative forage yield (P = 0.99). However, for the January harvest, Surrey and Gulf averaged 1030 (± 65) kg DM [ha.sup.-1], whereas Marshall yielded only 672 (± 79) kg DM [ha.sup.-1]. For the March harvest, yields of all varieties were similar and averaged 1350 (± 95) kg DM [ha.sup.-1]. At the May harvest, Marshall and Jackson yielded 1232 (± 123) kg DM [ha.sup.-1], whereas Gulf yielded only 929 (± 74) kg DM [ha.sup.-1]. Crude protein concentration differed significantly among harvests with a general decrease from 260 to 120 g CP [kg.sup.-1] as the growing mason progressed. Similar declines in nutritive value occurred for NDF, IVTD, and DNDF. Trends in yield distribution and forage quality may indicate a need for cultivar specific recommendations based on intended forage need and season of use., BEEF AND DAIRY CATTLE PRODUCERS require a consistent supply of high-quality forage to maintain economical levels of animal production. Beef and dairy cattle producers in the southeastern USA rely primarily [...]

Shading patterns when two forage species are intercropped may be different than in a monocrop environment. Our objectives were to quantify yield and forage quality response of forage soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] intercropped with forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] and compare to the measurements of monocrop soybean. Soybean plants were harvested from the middle portion of individual rows in plots containing only soybean and from plots having alternating soybean and sorghum rows spaced 76 cm apart. Morphological and forage quality measurements were determined on leaf and stem fractions. Morphological measurements included main stem length, node number, leaf area ratio (LAR), specific leaf weight (SLW), and stem diameter. Forage quality constituents included in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), hemicellulose, and cellulose, and crude protein (CP) concentrations. Intercropped soybean had 6 more plants [m.sup.-1] of row, less advanced morphological development, and 2.3 Mg [ha.sup.-1] less dry matter than monocrop soybean. Leaf IVDMD, NDF, hemicellulose, and cellulose did not differ between intercrop and monocrop soybean. However, stem IVDMD was 33 g [kg.sup.-1] greater for intercropped than monocrop soybean, reflecting the 36 g [kg.sup.-1] decrease in NDF concentration. Intercropped soybean was lodged both years more than monocrop soybean, which may have been due to the significant decrease in stem NDF. Leaf CP concentration was 25 g [kg.sup.-1] greater for monocrop soybean than intercropped soybean; however, stems from intercropped soybean had 12 g [kg.sup.-1] greater CP than monocrop soybean stems. Soybean exhibited a high degree of morphological plasticity, presumably in response to increased competition for solar radiation. Although forage quality of intercrop soybean was greater than monocrop soybean, intercropping forage-type soybean with another tall-growing forage does not appear to be practical because of the decrease in dry matter accumulation., Interplant competition is usually mediated through competition for soil water, available nutrients, and solar radiation, although other factors such as temperature fluctuation and pest infestations may be equally important (Buxton [...]

Forage quality as it relates to plant maturity is well established; however, strategies for improving fiber digestion in switchgrass populations have not been determined. The objectives of this study were to determine fiber digestion of sward components within switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) populations and which aspects of fiber digestion dynamics caused in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD) differences of six switchgrass populations. This study was conducted in 1993 near Ames, lA, and Mead, NE. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with a split-plot arrangement of treatments with four replicates at each location. Whole plots were populations and subplots were sward maturity. `Trailblazer', `Pathfinder', `Cave-in-Rock', and three experimental switchgrass populations were used in this study. Populations were harvested on 9 June, 19 July, and 27 August al Ames and on 10 June, 27 July, and 26 August at Mead. Fiber composition and digestibility were determined on leaf blade, leaf sheath, and stem fractions of the primary growth stages. Significant differences for theoretical true digestibility (TD) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) existed for morphological components at each sward maturity. However, digestion characteristics of the sward components were not stable across primary growth stages. Rate of fiber digestion was faster for most sward components at Ames than Mead, although stems of elongating tillers from elongating swards digested faster on plants grown at Mead than Ames. Rate of fiber digestion of stems was typically slower than either leaf blades or sheaths, but in several instances they were similar or stems had faster rates of fiber digestion. Although phenotypic selection can increase fiber digestibility, plant maturity remains an important factor, and selections may require evaluation at different stages of morphological development. Thus, improvements in forage digestion, at least in switchgrass, may only be manifested for the growth stage at which it was selected., Improved ruminant animal production can be achieved by selectively breeding forages for increased IVDMD. Vogel et al. (1981) showed that it was possible to select switchgrass for increased and decreased [...]