1. The nutriRECIPE-Index – development and validation of a nutrient-weighted index for the evaluation of recipes
- Author
-
Frank Forner, Olaf Christen, Ina Volkhardt, Gabriele I. Stangl, and Toni Meier
- Subjects
Medicine (General) ,Index (economics) ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,Target population ,Food processing and manufacture ,Public catering ,Nutrient ,R5-920 ,Statistics ,Medicine ,TX341-641 ,Meal ,Public health nutrition ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,business.industry ,Nutrition. Foods and food supply ,Significant difference ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,TP368-456 ,Weighting ,Diet quality ,Healthy meal index ,Stock price index ,Nutri-score ,business ,Research Article - Abstract
Background Our objective was to develop a nutrient-based index for evaluating and improving menus in public catering. The nutriRECIPE-Index comprises 24 nutrients and nutrient groups. In developing the index, the following steps were included: setting the goals of the index, nutrient selection, target metrics and scaling, weighting, proof of concept and validation of the index. Furthermore, a unique database was created to integrate bioactive plant compounds in the assessment. An assessment of standard recipes and supposedly healthy recipes should show a significant difference in the results of the nutriRECIPE-Index. Finally, the nutriRECIPE-Index should generate similar or more specific results than existing indices such as the Nutri-Score and the Healthy Meal Index. Methods A whole meal cycle (comprising 6 weeks, 106 recipes and including different menu lines, partially with different side dishes) at a university canteen was analysed with the Federal Food Code (BLS) and the nutriRECIPE-Index. The Healthy Meal Index (comprising 3 nutritionally relevant items) and the Nutri-Score algorithm (comprising 7 items) were used to validate the nutrient composition and the results of the nutriRECIPE-Index. Results The resulting scores of the recipes and menu lines showed substantial differences, wherein the meals of a health-promoting menu line usually received higher scores than the standard recipes. A correlation between the nutriRECIPE-Index and the Healthy Meal Index (0.604) and the Nutri-Score (0.591) was observed. The nutriRECIPE-Index was better at identifying the worst menus and could better separate mediocre menus from good menus. Conclusion The nutriRECIPE-Index is a useful and comprehensive tool for evaluating the nutritional value of recipes and is the first to consider bioactive plant compounds. Further adjustments to different target populations, settings, and cultural backgrounds are possible.
- Published
- 2021