Search

BACKGROUND Two-stage exchange is a commonly used approach for treating chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). A pre-reimplantation threshold value of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) to determine infection eradication and the proper timing of reimplantation remains ill-defined. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 483 potential patients for eligibility. In total, 178 patients were excluded. In addition, 305 joints were eligible who underwent 2-stage revision for prosthetic hip or knee joint infection (PJI). Serum ESR and CRP were recorded at 8 weeks post resection prior to stage 2 reimplantation. ESR and CRP were analyzed with receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) for response failure. RESULTS In total, 252 patients had resections for chronic infections while 53 septic patients had resections for acute infections. Forty-one of 252 (16.3%) patients failed reimplantation. Median ESR at the time of reimplantation was 17 (normal less than 20 mm/h). Median CRP was 0.6 (normal less than 0.5 mg/dL). ROC plot for response failure in analyzing ESR found an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.47. ROC plot analyzing CRP found an AUC of 0.57. The ratio of ESR/CRP was also utilized and found an AUC of 0.60. All of the AUC data are in the "fail to discriminate category." CONCLUSION Although improvements in serology can be somewhat reassuring, there are no statistically significant values of ESR or CRP that would predict failure of reimplantation in the 2-stage treatment of PJI. Because we are flying blind consideration should be made for mandatory pre-reimplantation aspirates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, Retrospective Case Series.

Background Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee carries significant morbidity, mortality, and economic cost. We hypothesize that obese and poor medical hosts will have a significant and additive increase in failure rate undergoing 2-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for PJI. Methods All 2-stage revision total knee arthroplasty procedures for PJI performed at one institution were identified between 2005 and 2020. In total, 144 patients were included and defined as success or failure based on published criteria regarding infection eradication, further intervention, or mortality. The American Society of Anesthesiologists score and the Charlson Comorbidity Index were utilized to assess host grade. Patient, surgical, and microbiologic variables were investigated with univariable and multivariable analysis to explore association with risk of failure. Results In the cohort, 32.4% of patients failed with mean follow-up of 5.1 years. In multivariable analysis, the number of major operations requiring arthrotomy and implantation of new material between the primary and first stage, host grade, and elevated body mass index were the major contributors to failure. Combining these factors, with body mass index >30 and 2 or more major operations, the failure rate increased to 76.5% and 71.4% respectively for American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3 (P ≤ .001) and Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (P ≤ .001). Conclusion In this cohort, multiple major operations between the primary and first stage, host grade, and obesity were the major contributors to failure. When combining these factors, patients had an additive increase in failure rate. Treatments such as amputation or less invasive options and suppression should be discussed and considered in these patients.

Background The microbiological implications of septic failure after 1-stage exchange for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip remain unclear. Methods Information was gathered on comorbidities, previous procedures, preoperative and postoperative microbiology results, methods of detection, and antibiotic resistance patterns, for all patients, who developed septic failure after 1-stage exchange for PJI of the hip performed at our institution during 2001-2017. Results Seventy-seven patients were identified. Septic failure was diagnosed a mean of 1.7 (standard deviation 2.3, range 0-11.8) years later. Although the spectrum of microorganisms was similar to preoperative, in the majority of patients (55%), the initial microorganism(s) was (were) replaced by (a) totally different microorganism(s). Overall, there was a decrease in the number of polymicrobial PJIs. The number of patients with high virulent microorganisms decreased significantly from 52 to 36 (P = .034). The number of PJIs due to gram-negative pathogens remained similar (11 vs 14, P = .491). The number of rifampicin-resistant staphylococci, fluoroquinolone-resistant streptococci, enterococci, and fungi changed from 8 to 15, 0 to 2, 7 to 3, and 1 to 2, respectively, but these changes did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion The majority of reinfections is caused by different infecting bacteria, hence it is essential to perform a new diagnostic workup and not base treatment decisions (solely) on historical cultures. We were furthermore unable to irrefutably prove that, from a microbiological point of view, septic failure after 1-stage exchange comes with increased challenges. Given the time interval to failure, we propose that a longer follow-up of these patients is needed, than previously suggested.

Purpose The aim of this study was to compare 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC-SPECT/CT combined with 99mTc-nanocollloid SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-WBC-PET/CT combined with 99mTc-Nanocollloid SPECT/CT for the diagnosis and treatment evaluation of chronic prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Methods Patients with suspected chronic PJI were examined with 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT, 18F-FDG-WBC PET/CT, and 99mTc-nanocolloid SPECT/CT (to visualize bone marrow). The location and patterns of uptake were noted and compared between the two leukocyte examinations. Both leukocyte examinations were evaluated visually for infection. The PET examinations were also evaluated semiquantitatively. Chronic PJI was verified clinically by microbial culture and successfully treated PJI was confirmed by 12 months symptom-free follow-up after cessation of antibiotics. Results Nineteen patients were included with 10 hip prostheses and nine knee prostheses. Fourteen were diagnosed with chronic PJI and five with successfully treated PJI. The sensitivity of visual evaluation of 99mTc-WBC-HMPAO SPECT/CT for all joints was 0.31 and for 18F-FDG-WBC PET/CT 0.38. The specificity was 0.80 and 0.83, respectively. All patients with a true-positive SPECT examination had a false-negative PET examination and vice versa. Semiquantitative evaluation of the hips gave an area under the curve of 0.905 using the iliac crest as the background. Semiquantitative evaluation of the knees did not produce significant results. Conclusion This pilot study showed no difference in the sensitivity or specificity of 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-WBC PET/CT when combined with 99mTc-nanocollloid SPECT/CT in the diagnosis or treatment evaluation of suspected late chronic PJI.

As the numbers of arthroplasties performed worldwide increase, so do complications such as prosthetic joint infection. Cases that require a two-stage revision of a total femur replacement in the femur pose an ongoing challenge to the modern orthopedic surgeon. Unlike antibiotic spacers in hip and knee arthroplasty, there lacks a commercially available cement spacer for use in total femur replacements. We describe a novel technique for the intraoperative fabrication of a total femur spacer which uses modular components. As such, our technique is unique as it is modular and, therefore, highly customisable to each individual patient. Individual components can be made by different members of the team simultaneously and then assembled to make the final construct, thereby minimizing operative time. Furthermore, the inherent stability of the spacer allows immediate partial weightbearing and functional rehabilitation while patients are waiting for their second-stage procedure.

Pyoderma gangrenosum is a neutrophilic dermatosis, which mimics both infection and necrotizing fasciitis, that can present after surgical interventions. We present the case of a 62-year-old male who underwent one-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Nine days after the surgery, he presented with wound breakdown, high fever, and elevated white blood cell count. Repeated debridement was performed, and empiric antibiotics were given. All tissue cultures and aspirates remained negative throughout treatment course, and the patient remained unresponsive to therapy. The patient was eventually diagnosed with pyoderma gangrenosum after infectious etiologies were ruled out and after a skin biopsy and dermatologic consultation. His condition rapidly improved after treatment with corticosteroids, and soft-tissue defects were repaired with skin substitute and full-thickness skin grafting. In patients with aseptic wound breakdown after total knee arthroplasty, pyoderma gangrenosum is a rare but devastating complication and should be considered.

Background and purpose — Strenuous efforts to minimize postoperative infection rates have been made, including the Swedish nationwide initiative Prosthesis Related Infections Shall be Stopped (PRISS). This study calculated the incidence rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) before and after PRISS. Patients and methods — All 45,438 primary TKAs registered in the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR) during 2007–2008 and 2012–2013 were included. Matched data on antibiotic prescriptions were obtained from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register (SPDR). All patients with ≥ 28 days of continuous antibiotic treatment within 2 years of primary surgery had their medical charts reviewed to identify cases of PJI. The incidence rate was calculated by dividing the number of PJIs by the total time at risk during each time period and presented as percentages with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results — 644 PJIs were identified, equaling a 2-year incidence rate of 1.45% (CI 1.34–1.57). The incidence rate was 1.44% (CI 1.27–1.61) before PRISS and 1.46% (CI 1.31–1.61) after. Diagnosis was made within 30 days of primary TKA in 52%, and within 90 days in 73% of cases. 603 cases were reoperated on or revised. Median time from operation to diagnosis was 29 days (1–716), for both time periods. Debridement with exchange of the insert was performed in 32% and 63% of cases before and after PRISS, respectively. Interpretation — We found similar incidence rates before and after the PRISS initiative without any statistically significant difference. Time to diagnosis was similar during both time periods. The project may have contributed to increased compliance with treatment protocols.

Introduction Self-reported penicillin allergies in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty often results in the use of second-line prophylactic antibiotics. A higher risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is associated with suboptimal antibiotics vs first generation cephalosporins, which have historically been grouped with other beta-lactam antibiotics such as penicillin for potential allergic reactions. This study evaluates the economic burden of self-reported penicillin allergies in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Methods Data from studies reporting true incidence of IgE-mediated penicillin allergies, infection-free survivorship of TJA, and cost of PJI attributed to use of second-line antibiotics were obtained. Projected cost of preoperative penicillin allergy testing and potentially avoidable PJI associated with second-line antibiotic usage were calculated. This was compared with projected cost of PJI in the current state to estimate cost savings. Results Implementation of preoperative penicillin allergy testing leads to a potential savings of nearly $37 million to payors in the first year based on 1-year survivorship. This savings increases to $411.6 million over a 10-year span and $1.18 billion over a 20-year span. Conclusion Preoperative penicillin allergy testing or risk stratification via thorough history should be implemented as standard of care for patients with self-reported penicillin allergies before TJA and would result in decreased cost of PJI.

DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention), one-stage and two-stage revision surgery are the most common management strategies for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) management. Our knowledge concerning their efficacy is based on short to medium-term low-quality studies. Most studies report infection recurrence rates or infection-free time intervals. However, long-term survival rates of the infection-free joints, functional and quality of life outcome data are of paramount importance. DAIR, one-stage and two-stage revision strategies are not unique surgical techniques, presenting several variables. Infection control rates for the above strategies vary from 75% to 90%, but comparisons are difficult because different indications and patient selection criteria are used in each strategy. Recent outcome data show that DAIR and one-stage revision in selected patients (based on host, bacteriological, soft tissue and type of infection criteria) may present improved functional and quality of life outcomes and reduced costs for health systems as compared to those of two-stage revision. It is expected that health system administrators and providers will apply pressure on surgeons and departments towards the wider use of DAIR and one-stage revision strategies. It is the orthopaedic surgeon’s responsibility to conduct quality studies in order to fully clarify the indications and outcomes of the different revision strategies. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:727-734. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210008

The number of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) cases is increasing along with total joint arthroplasties. There is currently no diagnostic test available with 100 % sensitivity to identify PJI. The aim of the study was to assess and compare two different bacteriophage K-based methods with standard microbiological culturing methods to detect staphylococci. Samples were retrieved from 104 patients undergoing revision surgery due to suspected PJI. Implants were subjected to sonication and sonicate fluid (SF) was assessed with the methods of qPCR detection of bacteriophage K DNA and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) detection after bacteriophage K lysis. The results were compared with the results of standard microbiological culturing methods. PJI was confirmed in 33 cases according to the PJI definition. Using the methods of ATP and bacteriophage K DNA detection 100 % specificity and predictive value were achieved. The sensitivity of qPCR detection was higher (81.25 %) than the sensitivity of ATP detection (62.50 %) when analyzing SF directly. The sensitivity of the methods significantly improved (to 94.12 %) with SF pre-cultivation. Importantly, both methods provided results in 3-4 hours when analyzing SF directly, while results from pre-cultivated SF were obtained 19-20 hours after sample collection. Our results suggest that bacteriophage-based methods are specific and sensitive and importantly, faster than standard culturing methods. The addition of new bacteriophages to expand the bacterial detection spectrum, could lead to the development of a faster, more sensitive, specific, and also economical and handy method for PJI diagnosis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Aims Fungal periprosthetic joint infections (fPJIs) are rare complications, constituting only 1% of all PJIs. Neither a uniform definition for fPJI has been established, nor a standardized treatment regimen. Compared to bacterial PJI, there is little evidence for fPJI in the literature with divergent results. Hence, we implemented a novel treatment algorithm based on three-stage revision arthroplasty, with local and systemic antifungal therapy to optimize treatment for fPJI. Methods From 2015 to 2018, a total of 18 patients with fPJI were included in a prospective, single-centre study (DKRS-ID 00020409). The diagnosis of PJI is based on the European Bone and Joint Infection Society definition of periprosthetic joint infections. The baseline parameters (age, sex, and BMI) and additional data (previous surgeries, pathogen spectrum, and Charlson Comorbidity Index) were recorded. A therapy protocol with three-stage revision, including a scheduled spacer exchange, was implemented. Systemic antifungal medication was administered throughout the entire treatment period and continued for six months after reimplantation. A minimum follow-up of 24 months was defined. Results Eradication of infection was achieved in 16 out of 18 patients (88.8%), with a mean follow-up of 35 months (25 to 54). Mixed bacterial and fungal infections were present in seven cases (39%). The interval period, defined as the period of time from explantation to reimplantation, was 119 days (55 to 202). In five patients, a salvage procedure was performed (three cementless modular knee arthrodesis, and two Girdlestone procedures). Conclusion Therapy for fPJI is complex, with low cure rates according to the literature. No uniform treatment recommendations presently exist for fPJI. Three-stage revision arthroplasty with prolonged systemic antifungal therapy showed promising results. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):671–678.

Background Prior studies have demonstrated that depression is an independent risk factor for developing a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). To our knowledge, there is no literature examining whether PJI or aseptic failure increases the risk of developing a new mental health diagnosis. Methods PearlDiver Patient Database (Colorado Springs, CO) was used to identify 80,826 patients who underwent TJA without a pre-existing diagnosis of depression, anxiety, a stress and/or adjustment disorder, and/or current use of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor within the year prior to surgery. The odds of developing a new mental health issue or being prescribed a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor within 1 year of an uncomplicated TJA was compared to those who developed PJI or mechanical failure within 90 days after TJA as well as to those who subsequently underwent revision surgery within 30 days of either complication using Fisher’s exact test and Baptista-Pike. Results A total of 6474 (8%) patients were diagnosed with a new mental health issue after TJA. PJI or mechanical failure led to significantly higher odds of new diagnoses with an odds ratio of 1.67 (95% confidence interval = 1.26, 2.22) and 1.57 (1.24, 2.00), respectively. Undergoing revision surgery for PJI or mechanical failure increased the odds of developing a new mental health diagnosis to 2.10 (1.29, 3.42) and 2.24 (1.36, 3.72), respectively. There was no significant difference comparing those who developed PJI vs those who sustained mechanical complications. Conclusion Patients who sustain complications after TJA are at increased odds of receiving a new mental health diagnosis, an effect further amplified if revision surgery is required.

Background: As primary total hip arthroplasty volume continues to increase, so will the number of revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) procedures. These complex cases represent a significant clinical and financial burden to the health-care system. Methods: This was a retrospective review using the National Inpatient Sample. International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th revision codes were used to identify patients who underwent rTHA and create cohorts based on rTHA indications from 2012 to 2018. National and regional trends for length of stay (LOS), cost, and discharge location were evaluated. Results: A total of 292,250 rTHA procedures were identified. The annual number of rTHA procedures increased by 28.1% from 2012 to 2018 (37,325 to 47,810). The top 3 indications for rTHA were instability (20.4%), aseptic loosening (17.8%), and infection (11.1%). Over the study period, the proportion of patients discharged to skilled nursing facility decreased from 44.2% to 38% (P < .001). Hospital LOS decreased on average from 4.8 to 4.4 days (P < .001). Infections had the highest average LOS (7.3 days) followed by periprosthetic fractures (6.5 days). Hospital costs decreased over the study period, from $25,794 to $24,555 (P < .001). The proportion of rTHA cases performed at urban academic centers increased (58.0% to 75.3%, P < .001) while the proportion performed at urban nonacademic centers decreased (35.5% to 19.4%, P < .001). Conclusion: Instability was the most common indication for rTHA between 2012 and 2018. The proportion of rTHA performed in urban academic centers has increased substantially, away from urban nonacademic centers. While cost and LOS have decreased, significant geographic variability exists.

Vancomycin is one of the most commonly used antibiotics for intra-articular (IA) infusion in the treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study aimed to preliminarily investigate the serum and synovial vancomycin concentrations in patients with PJI after IA infusion. In total, 16 patients who developed PJI were enrolled in this study; 14 of the patients were treated with IA infusion of vancomycin postoperatively, while the other 2 patients received intravenous (IV) infusion of vancomycin alone. Chemiluminescent immunoassay assay (CLIA) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) were used to determine the serum and synovial vancomycin concentrations, respectively. Administration of vancomycin 0.5 g once daily (qd) IA maintained a high vancomycin trough concentration in synovial fluid before the next IA dose, regardless of whether it was given in combination with IV administration. The combination vancomycin 0.5 g qd IA + vancomycin 1 g every 12 h (q12h) IV yielded relatively good trough concentrations of vancomycin in both serum and synovial fluid. The mean trough serum vancomycin concentration of patients who used vancomycin 1 g q12h IV therapy was above 10 μg/mL; however, no vancomycin was detected in their synovial fluid. The rational use of IA vancomycin infusion may help to achieve effective therapeutic concentrations of vancomycin in the serum and synovial fluid of patients with PJI.

Introduction. Several factors have been associated with the prognosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) treated with surgical debridement, antibiotic therapy, and implant retention (DAIR). There is no evidence about the right empirical antibiotic treatment when the causal microorganism is not still identified. Material and methods. We conducted a retrospective observational study in patients with PJI treated with DAIR between 2009 and 2018 in our center. We analyze the risk factors related with their prognosis and the influence of active empirical antibiotic therapy against causative microorganisms in final outcomes. Results. A total of 80 PJI cases treated with DAIR, from 79 patients (58.7% women, mean age 76.3 years), were included in the study period. Among the cases in which empirical antibiotic therapy were active against the causative microorganisms, the success rate was 46/65 (69.2%) vs 1/15 when not (6.7%, OR 31.5, p = 0.001). Factors related to the success or failure of the DAIR were analyzed with multivariate analysis. We found that active empirical antibiotic treatment remained statistically significant as a good prognostic factor (OR 0.04, p

Background and purpose - Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) have previously been associated with an increased risk of infections such as community-acquired pneumonia, gastrointestinal infections and central nervous system infection. Therefore, we evaluated a possible association between proton-pump inhibitor use and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA), because they can be stopped perioperatively or switched to a less harmful alternative. Patients and methods - A cohort of 5,512 primary THAs provided the base for a case-cohort design; cases were identified as patients with early-onset PJI. A weighted Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for the study design and to adjust for potential confounders. Results - There were 75 patients diagnosed with PJI of whom 32 (43%) used PPIs perioperatively compared with 75 PPI users (25%) in the control group of 302 patients. The risk of PJI was 2.4 times higher (95% CI 1.4-4.0) for patients using PPI. This effect remained after correction for possible confounders. Interpretation - The use of PPIs was associated with an increased risk of developing PJI after THA. Hence, the use of a PPI appears to be a modifiable risk factor for PJI.

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) can be challenging to eradicate and have high morbidity and mortality. Current microbiology culture methods can be associated with a high false-negative rate of up to 50%. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment, and negative results have been linked to a greater rate of reoperation.There has been increasing investigation of the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology such as metagenomic shotgun sequencing to help identify causative organisms and decrease the uncertainty around culture-negative infections. The clinical importance of the organisms detected and their management, however, requires further study. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has shown promise, but in recent years multiple studies have reported similar or lower sensitivity for bacteria detection in PJIs when compared to traditional culture. Furthermore, issues such as high cost and complexity of sample preparation and data analysis are to be addressed before it can move further toward routine clinical practice.Metagenomic NGS has shown results that inspire cautious optimism - both in culture-positive and culture-negative cases of joint infection. Refinement of technique could revolutionize the way PJIs are diagnosed, managed, and drastically improve outcomes from this currently devastating complication.

Background A multidisciplinary team responsible for the management plan of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) was founded in January 2008. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a decrease in the number of surgeries and length of stay (LOS) was seen in the management of PJI with the aid of the multidisciplinary team. Methods This retrospective cohort study consisted of a total of 154 postoperative PJIs from three time periods: 21 PJIs from 2005 to 2007 (Group 1), 65 PJIs from 2011 to 2013 (Group 2), and 68 PJIs from 2015 to 2016 (Group 3). Successful outcome was classified as the retention of the original implant or revised implant and no infection-related death. Results The median number of operations decreased from 2.0 operations (Group 1) to 1.0 operation (Group 3) (p = .023), and the median LOS was shortened from 49.0 days (Group 1) to 17.0 days (Group 3) (p = .000). The number of PJIs treated with two-stage exchange decreased from 52.4% (11/21, Group 1) to 16.2% (11/68, Group 3) (p = .004). Simultaneously, debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) as primary surgical treatment increased from 42.9% (9/21, Group 1) to 89.7% (61/68, Group 3) (p = .000). The successful outcome of DAIR improved from 55.6% (5/9, Group 1) to 85.2% (52/61, Group 3) (p = .077). Conclusions Treatment of PJI in a specialized centre with the aid of a multidisciplinary team lead to fewer surgeries and reduced LOS. Successful outcome of DAIR improved over time.

Background Two-stage revision remains the standard of care for prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty. However, there are substantial complications associated with articulating antibiotic hip spacers. Handmade and molded spacers have been shown to have higher rates of spacer fracture than antibiotic-coated prostheses (ACPs). The aim of this study is to review outcomes with an implant that is often categorized as an ACP spacer, the Zimmer-Biomet StageOne Select Femoral Spacer (ZBSO). Methods A retrospective review was performed of 63 patients who underwent placement of a ZBSO. Patients were compared based on whether or not an extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) was performed using Fisher’s exact and t-tests. Results Five patients were excluded due to lack of follow-up or death shortly after stage 1 surgery, leaving 58 patients. Spacer fracture was noted in 5 of 58 patients (8.6%). Sixteen patients underwent ETO and 25.0% suffered a spacer fracture compared to 2.3% without ETO (odds ratio 13.7, P = .0248). There was no association between patient demographics or ETO length and spacer fracture. Two patients had periprosthetic fractures (3.4%) and 4 had dislocations (6.9%). Forty-nine patients (84.4%) went on to second-stage revision; of those 26.5% failed to clear the infection and required an average of 2.2 additional surgeries. Conclusion The ZBSO spacer has overall complication rates similar to previously reported spacer series. Although the ZBSO looks like an ACP spacer, in the setting of ETO, it behaves like a molded or handmade spacer with a high rate of spacer fracture (25%) due to the small diameter of the core. This implant should be used with caution in combination with an ETO.

Hui-Ming Peng,1 Zong-Ke Zhou,2 Fei Wang,3 Shi-Gui Yan,4 Peng Xu,5 Xi-Fu Shang,6 Jia Zheng,7 Qing-Sheng Zhu,8 Li Cao,9 Xi-Sheng Weng1 1Department of Orthopedics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, CAMS & PUMC, Beijing, 100730, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Adult Joint Reconstruction, Xi’ an Honghui Hospital, Xi’ An, 710054, Shaanxi Province, People’s Republic of China; 6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230001, Anhui Province, People’s Republic of China; 7Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450003, Henan Province, People’s Republic of China; 8Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi’ An, 710032, Shanxi Province, People’s Republic of China; 9Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, Xinjiang, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Xi-Sheng WengDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, CAMS & PUMC, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +86-10-69152710Email drweng_wxs1377@163.comBackground and Aim: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most devastating complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, the antibiotic resistance of infecting pathogens can significantly vary in different parts of the country. In the current study, we analyzed the demographic and microbiological profiles of knee and hip PJI over three years and compared the microbiological differences between them.Methods: A multicenter retrospective study of PJI patients in 34 referral medical centers in mainland China from January 2015 to November 2017 was performed.Results: A total of 925 PJI patients were recruited, 452 were identified as knee PJIs, and 473 were hip PJIs. The most common causative pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (26.5%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (14.3%). Methicillin-resistant staphylococci were involved in 25.6% (237/925) of all PJI cases. Mycobacterium and fungus only accounted for 6.5% (61) of all cases. Enteric gram-negative bacilli, anaerobes, and polymicrobial pathogens were more common in hip joint prostheses than in knee PJI (P = 0.014; P = 0.006; P = 0.002, respectively).Conclusion: While the majority of causative pathogens in PJI cases are staphylococcal species, the prevalence of atypical organisms and resistant pathogens should also be given attention and warrant the need for empiric antibiotic treatment.Keywords: arthroplasty, hips, knees, microorganism, prosthetic joint infection

Background Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality following knee replacement surgery. The diagnosis can be challenging and is based on a combination of clinical suspicion, radiographic findings and also biochemical/ microbiological investigations. Our Aim was to review the role of aspiration and biopsy in the diagnosis of PJI in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Method/results Aspirated synovial fluid should be analysed by direct culture, via blood culture bottles, EDTA bottles for cell count and ‘point of care’ testing such as leucocyte esterase or alpha defensin. Synovial WCC and PMN cell percentage are important steps in diagnosis of both acute and chronic PJI. A minimum of 5 deep samples using a 5 clean instrument technique should be obtained and sent for tissue culture done either blind or arthroscopic. Formal fluoroscopic guided interface biopsy has also been described with excellent results. In a recent series of 86 TKRs preoperative arthroscopic biopsy group had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 94.7%, positive predictive value of 87.4% and a negative predictive value of 100%. Conclusion In the presence of clinical suspicion with raised biomarkers, it is recommended that aspiration +/- biopsy with synovial fluid testing is performed. Direct culture and cell count are recommended. ‘Point of care tests’ such as Leucocyte Esterase testing should be considered. Duration of culture, including pathogen and host factors, should be discussed with a local microbiology/ID department in the context of a formal multi-disciplinary team.

Instability remains one of the most frequent complications requiring revision surgery after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Elevated liners are often utilized to reduce the risk of dislocation; however, the literature is inconclusive, with no systematic reviews summarizing the data. Thus, this systematic review aimed to establish a consensus for the efficacy of elevated liners in primary THA by determining rates of overall revision and revision specifically for recurrent dislocation. This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible randomized-controlled trials and observational studies reporting on the use of elevated liners in primary total hip arthroplasty were identified through May 2020. A random effects model meta-analysis was conducted, and the I2 statistic was used to assess for heterogeneity. Eight studies met inclusion criteria, and overall, 26,507 patients undergoing primary THA with use of an elevated liner were included. In aggregate, the most common cause of revision was recurrent hip dislocation (1.3%, N = 82/6,267) followed by joint infection (1.2%, N = 45/3,772) and acetabular loosening (0.3%, N = 10/3,772). Notably, elevated liners were associated with a lower risk of revision for recurrent dislocation compared to neutral liners (HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.55–1.00; p = 0.048). This review found that after primary THA with the use of elevated liners, hip dislocation and prosthetic joint infection continued to be the most frequent reasons for revision surgery. However, elevated liners had a lower risk of revision for recurrent dislocation compared to neutral liners.

Background: The 2010 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines report insufficient evidence to address the diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Questions/Purposes: The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of MRI with multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination (MAVRIC) metal artifact suppression techniques in diagnosing PJI in the setting of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: Multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination MRIs obtained of THAs between November 2012 and November 2016 were queried. Radiology reports were classified as positive (suspicious for infection), negative (no features of infection), or inconclusive (infection cannot be excluded or correlation with aspiration suggested if clinically concerned). Chart review identified cases of deep PJI according to the modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Results: Of 2156 MRIs of THAs included, MRI was concerning for infection in 1.8% (n = 39), inconclusive in 1.2% (n = 26), and negative in 97.0% (n = 2091). Deep PJI was identified in 53 (2.5%) patients, 30 of whom (56.6%) had conclusively positive finding on MRI (false-negative rate: 43.4%, sensitivity: 56.6%). Of 2103 aseptic THAs, only 9 (0.4%) MRIs were read as suspicious for infection (false-positive rate: 0.4%; specificity: 99.6%). Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging with MAVRIC is a highly specific test for PJI with a low false-positive rate. This indicates that when clinicians are provided with an MRI that unexpectedly suggests infection, a formal evaluation for infection is indicated. In patients with otherwise equivocal diagnostic findings, MRI may help confirm, but not refute, a diagnosis of PJI. Prospective study with more experienced image reviewers may further support the use of MRI in PJI.

Aims Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are among the most devastating complications after joint arthroplasty. There is limited evidence on the efficacy of different antiseptic solutions on reducing biofilm burden. The purpose of the present study was to test the efficacy of different antiseptic solutions against clinically relevant microorganisms in biofilm. Methods We conducted an in vitro study examining the efficacy of several antiseptic solutions against clinically relevant microorganisms. We tested antiseptic irrigants against nascent (four-hour) and mature (three-day) single-species biofilm created in vitro using a drip-flow reactor model. Results With regard to irrigant efficacy against biofilms, Povidone-iodine treatment resulted in greater reductions in nascent MRSA biofilms (logarithmic reduction (LR) = 3.12; p < 0.001) compared to other solutions. Bactisure treatment had the greatest reduction of mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms (LR = 1.94; p = 0.032) and a larger reduction than Vashe or Irrisept for mature Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms (LR = 2.12; p = 0.025). Pooled data for all biofilms tested resulted in Bactisure and Povidone-iodine with significantly greater reductions compared to Vashe, Prontosan, and Irrisept solutions (p < 0.001). Conclusion Treatment failure in PJI is often due to failure to clear the biofilm; antiseptics are often used as an adjunct to biofilm clearance. We tested irrigants against clinically relevant microorganisms in biofilm in vitro and showed significant differences in efficacy among the different solutions. Further clinical outcome data is necessary to determine whether these solutions can impact PJI outcome in vivo. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):908–915.

Background Extensor mechanism disruption (EMD) combined with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty are life-changing complications. The literature suggests many eventually receive above-knee amputation and lose ambulatory function. An alternative is modular knee fusion (KF), but little is known about its outcomes and biomechanical function. We report early term results on a case series of patients. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent 2-stage reconstruction with modular KF for combined EMD and PJI. Patient-reported outcomes at 1 year after arthrodesis and complications of surgery were recorded. Biomechanical analysis was conducted on 6 patients >1 year after surgery to measure gait speed and balance. Results Fifteen patients received a modular KF. At the most recent follow-up visit (average 25.7 months), 12 patients had their modular KFs in place and were ambulatory while 2 had died. Six patients used a walker; 4, a cane; and 2, unassisted. Gait analysis of 6 of these patients showed variation in patterns and speed. Balance was better than historical controls treated with above-knee amputation. Average Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Junior was 76 ± 11. Conclusion Modular KF for EMD and PJI can result in successful outcomes in terms of preventing additional operations and maintaining ambulation. While speed is variable, physical testing shows this method for limb salvage may allow patients to ambulate with a gait aid although further studies are needed to evaluate midterm and long-term results.

Fungal periprosthetic joint infections are an uncommon but potentially devastating complication of arthroplasty surgery. The concurrent presence of a coexistent bacterial pathogen—a so called “super-infection”—adds further complexity. With delays to definitive diagnosis and a large number of procedures before cure, the associated physical and psychological morbidity is considerable. Beyond this, the economic and resource burden can be substantial. This case report presents the successful rapid treatment of an atypical bacterial and fungal periprosthetic super-infection with two-stage revision surgery augmented with a commercially available dissolving calcium sulfate bead system permitting targeted local antifungal elution. While not the panacea for treatment, these beads provide another potentially useful tool in the atypical pathogen eradication armamentarium. Much research is still indicated to define the optimal care pathway for fungal periprosthetic super-infections.

It remains unclear whether rheumatoid arthritis might be a cause of false positive of the histology for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of the histology for the diagnosis of infection during hip and knee prosthesis revision in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. All patients with the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) undergoing hip or knee revision surgery (total or partial) were retrospectively reviewed. Positive histology was considered when ≥ 5 neutrophils per high-power field (400×) were found in at least five separate microscopic fields. Patients who presented ≥ 2 positive cultures for the same microorganism or the presence of fistula were considered as “true positives”. Thirty-two hip (n = 12) and knee (n = 20) revision procedures were performed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the histology were 50%, 78.6%, 25% and 91.7%, respectively. Six out of the eight patients presenting with positive histology had negative cultures (75.0% of false positives). Our results suggest that, in the context of RA, negative histological results have a very high negative predictive value. RA poses false positive histology results for the diagnosis of infection during hip and knee revision when conventional cultures are used for diagnosis of infection.

Background Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a morbid complication following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). PJI diagnosis and treatment has changed over time, and patient co-management with a high-volume musculoskeletal infectious disease (MSK ID) specialist has been implemented at our institution in the last decade. Methods We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive TJA patients treated for PJI between 1995 and 2018 by a single high-volume revision TJA surgeon. Microbial identities, antibiotic resistance, prior PJI, and MSK ID consultation were investigated. Results In total, 261 PJI patients (median age 66 years, interquartile range 57-75) were treated. One-year and 5-year reinfection rates were 15.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.6-20.7) and 22.1% (95% CI 17.0-27.7), respectively. Microbial identities and antibiotic resistances did not change significantly over time. Despite seeing more prior PJI patients (53.3% vs 37.6%, P = .012), MSK ID-managed patients had similar infection rates as non-MSK ID-managed patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.6-1.75, P = .93). Prior PJI was associated with higher reinfection risk (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.39-4.12, P = .002) overall and in patients without MSK ID consultation, specifically (HR 2.78, 95% CI 1.37-5.65, P = .005). This risk was somewhat lower and did not reach significance in prior PJI patients with MSK ID consultation (HR 1.97, 95% CI 0.87-4.48, P = .106). Conclusion We noted minimal differences in microbial/antibiotic resistances for PJI over 20 years in a single institution, suggesting current standards of PJI treatment remain encouragingly valid in most cases. MSK ID involvement was not associated with lower reinfection risk overall; however, in patients with prior PJI, the risk of reinfection appeared to be somewhat lower with MSK ID involvement. Level of Evidence Level IV–Case Series.

In view of the demographic changes and projected increase of arthroplasty procedures worldwide, the number of prosthetic joint infection cases will naturally grow. Therefore, in order to counteract this trend more rigid rules and a stricter implementation of effective preventive strategies is of highest importance. In the absence of a "miracle weapon" priorities should lie in evidence-based measures including preoperative optimization of patients at higher infection risks, the fulfilment of strict hygiene rules in the operating theatre and an effective antibiotic prophylaxis regimen. Instead of a "one size fits all" philosophy, it has been proposed to adjust the antibiotic prophylaxis protocol to major infection risks taking into account important patient- and procedure-related risk factors. A stronger focus on the local application mode via use of high dose dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement in such risk situations may have its advantages and is easy to apply in the theatre. The more potent antimicrobial growth inhibition in vitro and the strong reduction of the prosthetic joint infection rate in risk for infection patients with aid of dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement in clinical studies align with this hypothesis.

Background Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most frequent and devastating causes of short-term revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In vitro evidence suggests ceramic surfaces demonstrate resistance to biofilm, but the clinical effect of bearing surface modifications on the risk of PJI remains unclear. This premier registry-based study examines the influence of ceramic bearing surface coatings on the outcome in cemented primary TKA. Methods In total, 117,660 cemented primary TKAs in patients with primary osteoarthritis recorded in the German arthroplasty registry since 2012 were followed up for a maximum of 3 years. The primary endpoint was risk of revision for PJI on ceramic coated and uncoated cobalt-chromium-molybdenum femoral components. Propensity score matching for age, gender, obesity, diabetes mellitus, depression and Elixhauser comorbidity index, and substratification on common design twins with and without coating was performed. Results In total, 4637 TKAs (85.1% female) with a ceramic-coated femoral component were identified, 42 had been revised for PJI and 122 for other reasons at 3 years. No survival advantage due to the risk of revision for PJI could be determined for ceramic-coated components. Revision for all other reasons demonstrated a significant higher rate for TKAs with ceramic-coated components. However, the results of this were confounded by a strong prevalence (20.7% vs 0.3%) of metal sensitivity in the ceramic-coated group. Conclusion No evidence of reduced risk for PJI due to ceramic-coated implants in cemented primary TKA was found. Further analysis for revision reasons other than PJI is required.

Osteoarticular infection with Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) is a rare complication of bladder cancer treatment with intravesical Bacillus Calmette–Guèrin (BCG). We describe a case of disseminated Mycobacterium bovis BCG infection masquerading as a chronic prosthetic joint infection in a patient with several risk factors for progressive mycobacterial infection.

Background Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) of total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after dental procedures is uncommon, and antibiotic prophylaxis remains controversial. For high-risk patients, the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons recommends amoxicillin prophylaxis. However, no systematic review of the literature of PJIs associated with dental procedures explores if amoxicillin is suitable for the reported organisms. Methods A librarian-assisted search of the major databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus) identified 954 articles. Only case reports, case series, and reviews with patient level data were included. After exclusions, 79 articles were fully reviewed. Results Forty-four PJIs after dental procedures were identified, 22 in primary THA, 20 in primary TKA, one in revision THA, and one in a hip resurfacing procedure. Antibiotic prophylaxis was documented for 5 patients. The dental procedure was invasive in 35 (79.5%). Comorbidities were present in 17 patients (38.7%). The organisms reported were Streptococcus spp. in 44%, other aerobic gram-positives in 27%, anaerobic gram-positives in 18%, and gram-negative organisms in 11%. An estimated 46% of organisms may be resistant to amoxicillin. The outcomes of treatment were reported for 35 patients (79.5%). Twenty-seven patients (61.4%) had no clinical signs of PJI at the final follow-up visit. Conclusions Lower extremity PJI associated with dental procedures is often caused by organisms unlikely to be prevented with amoxicillin. Additional studies are warranted to determine the choice and efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent dental-associated PJI in the highest risk patients. Insufficient data exist to recommend the optimal treatment for patients with PJI in THA and TKA associated with dental procedures.

Despite different criteria to diagnose a prosthetic joint infection (PJI), aetiological diagnosis of the causing microorganism remains essential to guide treatment. Molecular-biology-based PJI diagnosis is progressing (faster, higher specificity) in different techniques, from the experimental laboratory into clinical use. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction techniques (custom-made or commercial) provide satisfactory results in clinical series of cases, with specificity close to 100% and sensitivity over 70–80%. Next-generation metagenomics may increase sensitivity while maintaining high specificity. Molecular biology techniques may represent, in the next five years, a significant transformation of the currently available microbiological diagnosis in PJI. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:93-100. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200118

Fungal prosthetic joint infection is rare, and two-stage revision is usually advocated. We present our experience with 2 cases of fungal prosthetic knee joint infection presenting 25 months and 3 years after index surgery. Both patients were managed with single-stage revision arthroplasty and fluconazole monotherapy. They remain asymptomatic with good knee society score after 2 years of follow-up. Preoperative workup of all aseptic loosening cases should include extended culture for fungal elements. Single-stage revision with antifungal therapy for 3 months gives good results in nonimmunocompromised patients with good soft-tissue envelope.

Poor oral health is common in the United States; however, it is much more common in African Americans, Hispanics, and other racial/ethnic minorities. Almost one in five low-income adults states that their mouth and teeth are in poor condition. Twenty-nine percent of Americans have no dental insurance. Patients who have active infections are at greater risk for prosthetic joint infection. Optimization in these vulnerable groups should focus on treating active infections, with a prioritization of free clinics, academic clinics, and websites, such as "The Neighborhood Navigator," and easily accessible surgical consults.

Aims The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be difficult. All current diagnostic tests have problems with accuracy and interpretation of results. Many new tests have been proposed, but there is no consensus on the place of many of these in the diagnostic pathway. Previous attempts to develop a definition of PJI have not been universally accepted and there remains no reference standard definition. Methods This paper reports the outcome of a project developed by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and supported by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Implant-Associated Infections (ESGIAI). It comprised a comprehensive review of the literature, open discussion with Society members and conference delegates, and an expert panel assessment of the results to produce the final guidance. Results This process evolved a three-level approach to the diagnostic continuum, resulting in a definition set and guidance, which has been fully endorsed by EBJIS, MSIS, and ESGIAI. Conclusion The definition presents a novel three-level approach to diagnosis, based on the most robust evidence, which will be useful to clinicians in daily practice. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):18–25.

Introduction: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare complication of total knee replacement (TKR), yet it is a serious and debilitating condition. Bacterial infection accounts for the majority of cases and fungal infection is estimated to cause 1% of all prosthesis infection. Case Report: This case presents a 60years female, who presented to our outpatient orthopedic clinic complaining of right knee pain, swelling, and hotness. The physical examination revealed redness, hotness, restricted range of movement, and tibial loosening, 9 months following TKR revision. Culture of the joint aspirate showed growth of “Candida parapsilosis” and second aspirate confirmed the diagnosis. The patient then underwent two stages revision surgery with placement of amphotericin B loaded cement, to maintain high local antifungal concentration in addition to decrease the side effects of amphotericinB infusion such as thrombophlebitis and the more serious systemic effect as nephrotoxicity. The post-operative course was uneventful, with gradual improvement and restoration of normal movement range. Conclusion: Fungal PJI is a rare complication of TKR, yet it results in severe debilitating symptoms and impairment of the patient functional capacity. Careful evaluation of the patient followed by a detailed workup is necessary for the identification of the underlying causative micro-organism. Two-stage revision surgery with antifungal loaded cement spacer and antifungal therapy currently is the standard of management. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first fungal PJI following total knee arthroplasty reported in Jordan. Keywords: Fungal prosthetic joint infection, fungal infection, total knee replacement, total knee replacement complication.

Aims This study aimed to compare the effect of antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) versus plain bone cement (PBC) on revision rates for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and all-cause revisions following primary elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for studies comparing ALBC versus PBC, reporting on revision rates for PJI or all-cause revision following primary elective THA or TKA. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. The study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO ID CRD42018107691). Results Nine studies and one registry report were identified, enabling the inclusion of 371,977 THA and 671,246 TKA. Pooled analysis for THA demonstrated ALBC was protective against revision for PJI compared with PBC (relative risk (RR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 0.77; p < 0.001), however, no differences were seen for all-cause revision rate (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.09; p = 0.100). For TKA, there were no significant differences in revision rates for PJI or all causes between ALBC and PBC (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.45; p = 0.730, and RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.02; p = 0.060, respectively). Conclusion ALBC demonstrated a protective effect against revision for PJI compared with PBC in THA with no difference in all-cause revisions. No differences in revision rates for PJI and all-cause revision between ALBC and PBC for TKA were observed. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):7–15.

Background The burden of knee replacement prosthetic joint infection (KR PJI) is increasing. KR PJI is difficult to treat, outcomes can be poor and it is financially expensive and limited evidence is available to guide treatment decisions. Aim To provide guidelines for surgeons and units treating KR PJI. Methods Guideline formation by consensus process undertaken by BASK's Revision Knee Working Group, supported by outputs from UK-PJI meetings. Results Improved outcomes should be achieved through provision of care by revision centres in a network model. Treatment of KR PJI should only be undertaken at specialist units with the required infrastructure and a regular infection MDT. This document outlines practice guidelines for units providing a KR PJI service and sets out: • The necessary infrastructure required to provide a high-quality KR PJI service • The MDT composition — who and when • The KR PJI care pathway • Medical and surgical treatment strategies • The indications for referral to tertiary units (Major Revision Centres) • Outcome metrics and auditable standards Conclusions KR PJI patients treated within the NHS should be provided the best care possible. This report sets out guidance and support for surgeons and units to achieve this.

We present the first reported case of prosthetic joint infection caused by Trueperella pyogenes. This animal pathogen rarely causes human infection. Our patient was successfully treated with single-stage exchange and 12 weeks of rifampicin and moxifloxacin.

We report a case series of 5 patients who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a polypropylene mesh for capsular reconstruction for chronic THA instability. The average follow-up is 16.6 months (range, 9-20 months). There were no postoperative dislocations in our series. Three patients had previous infections with two-stage revisions before final revision surgery and were infection free at their most recent follow-up. One patient developed a prosthetic joint infection 2 months postoperatively. The use of a polypropylene mesh appears to be another tool that surgeons can use when dealing with the difficult dilemma on how to treat the patient with chronic THA instability and severe abductor and capsular tissue loss.

The management of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) requires discussion between experts working towards the aims and expectations of the patient. Each discipline typically does not offer a single-minded approach, but instead collectively weighs up the strengths and weaknesses of different management options. At a basic level, the infection specialist provides antimicrobial solutions based on laboratory results. During multi-disciplinary team (MDT) discussions however, they can offer additional insights into how the microbiology could influence the surgical decisions, respond to the surgical debate by designing a rational approach to antimicrobials and contribute to an option-appraisal that can be presented to the patient. In this short opinion piece, we describe some of the thoughts we have during MDT discussions to ultimately recommend an optimised treatment plan for the individual patient: is there infection? what is the pathogen? where did it come from? (and where else has it gone), and what is the best treatment strategy?

Background Higher rates of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are related to patient risk factors and/or to special surgical procedures such as revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Among the measures discussed to better protect those patients from the higher infection risks use of dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement has emerged as a further prophylactic option. Methods This retrospective study included 246 patients undergoing strictly aseptic revision knee arthroplasty at our institution in the time period 2015-2018. Based on the type of bone cement used for the cementation of the revision prosthesis, 2 groups were defined. In total, 143 patients received the low-dose single antibiotic-loaded bone cement (SALBC) PALACOS R+G and 103 patients received the high-dose dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement (DALBC) COPAL G+C. The number of PJI cases in each group over a follow-up time of minimum 1 year was compared and the extra costs for the DALBC use calculated against the economic savings per each avoided PJI case on basis of 3 different assumptions (treatment costs and amount of cement use). Results Use of DALBC in aseptic rTKA was associated with a significant reduction in PJI cases (relative risk = 57%, PJI rate in the SALBC group 4.1% vs 0% in the DALBC group, P = 0.035). The calculated total savings per patient was $1367. Depending on the economic assumptions the range of savings was between $1413 (less favorable calculation model) and $3661 (most favorable calculation model). Conclusion The use of DALBC in rTKA has been found to be more effective in preventing PJI and proved cost-efficient in all our cost-calculation models.

Diagnostic thresholds used to standardize the definition for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) have largely focused on total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Established PJI thresholds exist for serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in TJA; however, they do not exist for revision hip hemiarthroplasty (rHHA). The purpose of this study was to establish thresholds for (1) ESR and (2) CRP to diagnose PJI in rHHA. Data were collected on a prospective cohort of 69 rHHA patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery between 1/2017 and 2/2019 in a single health care system. Procedures were categorized as septic or aseptic revisions using Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria (2013). There were 44 ESRs (n = 28 aseptic, n = 16 septic) and 46 CRPs (n = 29 aseptic, n = 17 septic) available for analysis. Two tailed t-tests were performed to compare the mean ESR and CRP in aseptic and septic cases. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to obtain diagnostic cutoff thresholds using the Youden's Index (J) for ESR and CRP. The mean ESR was 50.3 ± 30.6 mm/h versus 15.4 ± 17.7 mm/h (p

Explantation and placement of an antibiotic spacer is a well-recognized treatment for periprosthetic infection after total knee replacement. Although static spacers may be occasionally indicated, many patients benefit from an articulating spacer that preserves the function and range of motion. However, many articulating spacer techniques provide an imbalanced cement-on-cement articulating knee that cannot tolerate full weight-bearing or provide adequate stability for daily function. A more durable articulating spacer may be ideal by permitting unrestricted weight-bearing, a functional range of motion, and potentially delayed reimplantation for medically complex patients. We present our evolved and reproducible technique for gap-balanced articulating spacers using cement augments and dowel stems. The result is a stable construct that permits full weight-bearing and a functional range of motion.

KEY POINTS An 82-year-old woman was transferred to our hospital from another centre after sustaining a fall, which had been preceded by several days of right hip pain. She had undergone a right total hip arthroplasty (uncemented with femoral head of cobalt–chromium alloy) for osteoarthritis

Background High fever, knee swelling and pain after knee arthroplasty are often considered as symptoms of acute prosthetic joint infection. However, similar symptoms can also present as primary manifestations of adult-onset Still’s disease, which creates some interference in differential diagnosis. To our knowledge, this is the first published case of misdiagnosis of adult Still’s disease after total knee arthroplasty, who was initially misdiagnosed as an prosthetic joint infection due to the above-mentioned symptoms. The symptoms of the knee infection was not relieve after several revisions and continous antibiotic treatment. Finally, after several consultations and repeated evaluation it was diagnosed as adult-onset Still’s disease. Case presentation A 77-year-old female who underwent bilateral total knee arthroplasty 6 years ago was admitted to our hospital with high fever, right knee effusion and painful knee. Based on the results of joint fluid aspiration and culture, we treated the right knee as acute hematogenous prosthetic joint infection. After three debridement and revision surgeries, the patient’s symptoms continued to persist. Subsequent manifestations of other symptoms such as typical rash and sore throat and laboratory examination suggested the possibility of adult-onset Still’s disease. So she underwent diagnostic steroid hormone therapy at the recommendation of a rheumatologist, and a final revision was performed after symptom was controlled. At the one-year follow-up, the patient’s symptoms completely resolved and the knee revision was functioning well. Conclusions When joint swelling and pain occurs after knee arthroplasty, the possibility of joint infection should not only be considered, but rheumatic autoimmune diseases should also be differentiated. Because the manifestations of joint infection and rheumatic immune disease sometimes overlap highly, when reasonable treatment over a period of time fails to relieve symptoms and signs, we should notice subtle differences in symptoms and laborotary tests and look for other diagnostic possibilities in time.

Introduction: This study aims to investigate whether patients undergoing two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and one-stage revision THA for aseptic reasons have similar clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction during their post-operative follow-up. We hypothesise that the two-stage revision THA for PJI is associated with poorer outcomes as compared to aseptic revision THA. Materials and Methods: We reviewed prospectively collected data in our tertiary hospital arthroplasty registry and identified patients who underwent revision THA between 2001 and 2014, with a minimum of two years follow-up. The study group (two-stage revision THA for PJI) consists of 23 patients and the control group (one-stage revision THA for aseptic reasons) consists of 231 patients. Patient demographics, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores and patient reported satisfaction were evaluated. Student’s t-test was used to compare continuous variables between the two groups. Statistical significance was defined as p