Search

Background The purpose is to compare the efficacy and safety of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (standard-PCNL) in patients with renal stones >2cm. Materials and Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant studies before March 8, 2021. Stone-free rate (SFR), operation time, fever rate, hemoglobin drop, blood transfusion rate, and hospitalization time were used as outcomes to compare mini-PCNL and standard-PCNL. The meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager version 5.4. Results Seven randomized controlled trials were included in our meta-analysis, involving 1407 mini-PCNL cases and 1436 standard-PCNL cases. Our results reveal that, for renal stones >2cm, mini-PCNL has a similar SFR (risk ratio (RR)=1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98 to 1.04, p=0.57) and fever rate (RR=1.22, 95% CI: 0.97-1.51, p=0.08). Standard-PCNL was associated with a significantly shorter operating time (weighted mean difference (WMD)=8.23, 95% CI: 3.44 to 13.01, p 2cm renal stones, mini-PCNL should be considered an effective and reliable alternative to standard-PCNL (30F). It achieves a comparable SFR to standard-PCNL, but with less blood loss, lower transfusion rate, and shorter hospitalization. However, the mini-PCNL does not show a significant advantage over the 24F standard-PCNL. On the contrary, this procedure takes a longer operation time. Trial registration This meta-analysis was reported consistent with the PRISMA statement and was registered on PROSPERO, with registration number 2021CRD42021234893.

Background Demographic changes are leading to an increase in geriatric urolithiasis patients aged ≥70 yr. Published data regarding their management remain sparse. In particular, for the subgroup of patients aged ≥80 yr there is a lack of evidence supporting the hypothesis that stone-removing treatment is effective, safe, and beneficial. Objective To examine the efficiency and safety of stone-removing treatment in geriatric urolithiasis patients aged ≥80 yr compared to their younger geriatric counterparts aged 70–79 yr against the background of their respective life expectancy. Design, setting, and participants Data for the study cohort were extracted from an institutional review board–approved retrospective database with 325 patients aged ≥70 yr (70–79 yr: n = 241; ≥80 yr: n = 84) consecutively admitted to hospital because of symptomatic urolithiasis from 2013 to 2018. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Baseline characteristics, outcome and follow-up data, and survival were compared using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U tests, χ2 tests, Kaplan-Meier estimation, log-rank tests, and Cox regression. Results and limitations At baseline, the incidence of infected hydronephrosis was greater among patients aged ≥80 yr (p 0.05). Survival analysis for the two groups demonstrated a 2-yr overall survival (OS) rate of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75–1) for patients aged ≥80 yr and 0.97 (95% CI 0.88–1), for those aged 70–79 yr (p Conclusions Stone-removing treatment for patients aged ≥80 yr proved to be as effective and safe as for patients in their seventies. Although characterized by shorter remaining life expectancy, excellent 2-yr OS for patients aged ≥80 yr supports the hypothesis of equal benefit from stone-removing treatment when compared to septuagenarians. Patient summary There is a lack of evidence supporting the benefit of urinary stone-removing treatment for patients older than 80 yr. Our study included geriatric patients older than 70 yr with symptomatic urinary stone disease for which urinary drainage or stone removal is indicated. We compared treatment outcomes and survival between two age groups: patients aged 70–79 yr and those aged 80 yr or older. We found equivalent outcomes for the two groups and excellent 2-yr overall survival of 91% for those older than 80 yr. The study strengthens the evidence that active stone-removing therapy is safe and beneficial for these patients.

Background: Successful percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) relies on a technically challenging, precise needle puncture of the renal collecting system. We aimed to compare, in an ex vivo model, the use of a real time image guidance system (the SabreSource™) and a mechanical stabilising device with conventional manual techniques for the accuracy of needle placement. Methods: The SabreSource™ system (Minrad International Inc.; New York, USA) is a real time image guidance system. The system platform is mounted on a C-arm fluoroscope. It employs targeting cross hairs on the fluoroscopic image that can be easily positioned to target the desired renal calyx. The system directs a visible laser beam onto the patient which is precisely aligned with the cross hairs on the fluoroscopic image. This provides the correct “bull’s-eye” angle of approach to the calyx, even after the x-ray source is turned off. The locator then stabilises the needle in the “bull’s-eye” position so that only screening for depth is required. Objective assessment using a simulated PCNL puncture was performed by 7 urologic trainees on a kidney phantom with and without using the SabreSource™. Fluoroscopy screening time (FST) and amount of radiation (mGy) used to achieve successful puncture were compared. Results: Simulated PCNL puncture was quicker and resulted in reduced radiation exposure when the apparatus was used. The mean FST for traditional “bull’s-eye” vs SabreSource™ puncture was 17 vs 5 seconds (p = 0.01), and the mean radiation exposure to puncture was 0.7 vs 0.2 mGy (p = 0.03), respectively. Conclusion: The SabreSource™ is a novel assistant to achieving successful PCNL puncture. In combination with “the locator” the preliminary in vitro testing suggests that the device reduces fluoroscopy exposure and is quicker. The device warrants further evaluation in the clinical setting.&nbsp

OBJECTIVE Using anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs in patients with cardiovascular and medical comorbidities is prevalent. Because of hyper vascular nature of kidney, physicians tend to stop using aspirin before percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We have shown the effects of remaining on low dose aspirin in complete supine PCNL (csPCNL). MATERIAL AND METHODS The records of 643 patients who underwent csPCNL between 2012 and 2018 were analyzed. Surgical outcomes and complications of patients who were on aspirin therapy and continued it daily (group A) were compared with those not taking aspirin (group B). RESULTS Of the 643 csPCNLs, 40 (6%) were performed in patients of group A and the rest of 603 (94%) cases were in group B. The differences between the mean age of groups were statistically significant (60.08±9.45, group A and 48.66±12.32, group B) (P

Context Paediatric stone disease is an important clinically entity and management is often challenging. Although it is known that the condition is endemic in some geographic regions of the world, the global incidence is also increasing. Patient age and sex; the number, size, location, and composition of the stone; and the anatomy of the urinary tract are factors that need to be taken into consideration when choosing a treatment modality. Objective To provide a general insight into the evaluation and management of urolithiasis in the paediatric population in the era of minimally invasive surgery. Evidence acquisition A nonsystematic review of the literature on management of paediatric urolithiasis was conducted with the aim of presenting the most suitable treatment modality for different scenarios. Evidence synthesis Because of high recurrence rates, open surgical intervention is not the first option for paediatric stone disease, except for very young patients with very large stones in association with congenital abnormalities. Minimally invasive surgeries have become the first option with the availability of appropriately sized instruments and accumulating experience. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is noninvasive and can be carried out as an outpatient procedure under sedation, and is the initial choice for management of smaller stones. However, for larger stones, SWL has lower stone-free rates and higher retreatment rates, so minimally invasive endourology procedures such as percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery are preferred treatment options. Conclusions Contemporary surgical treatment for paediatric urolithiasis typically uses minimally invasive modalities. Open surgery is very rarely indicated. Patient summary Cases of urinary stones in children are increasing. Minimally invasive surgery can achieve high stone-free rates with low complication rates. After stone removal, metabolic evaluation is strongly recommended so that medical treatment for any underlying metabolic abnormality can be given. Regular follow-up with imaging such as ultrasound is required because of the high recurrence rates.

Background: Renal stone disease is a common disorder in urology practice. Kidney stone has various treatment methods such as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, an...

INTRODUCTION The burden of kidney stone disease (KSD) has risen, and several treatment options now exist. We wanted to evaluate the preference and treatment choices based on the information provided for management of hypothetical 8mm and 15mm renal stone, and factors that influenced their decision. METHODS An online questionnaire to investigate trends in decision-making for two hypothesized scenarios of asymptomatic kidney stones (8mm and 15mm) was formatted online in Microsoft Forms and posted on social media (Facebook) in Europe. The ethical approval was obtained from the university ethics committee and data was collected from general public between Sept-Nov 2020. RESULTS A total of 476 participants of different age and background answered the survey with a male:female ratio of 1:2.7. The age groups were categorised as 18-25 years (n=149), 26-49 years (n=192) and 50+ years (n=135). In the 8mm scenario, 107 of the 476 participants (22.5%) chose observation (OBS), 249 (52.3%) chose shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and 120 (25.2%) opted for ureteroscopy (URS). In the 15mm scenario, 194 participants chose SWL treatment (40.8%), 216 (45.4%) URS, and 66 (13.9%) preferred percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The influencing factors were success rate, complication risk and invasiveness of the procedure. On comparison to 8mm stone, while stent avoidance and activity limitation were considered less important with 15mm stone (p

PURPOSE High-quality evidence comparing supine to prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of complex stones is lacking. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of supine position (SUP) and prone position (PRO) PCNL. MATERIALS AND METHODS A noninferior randomized controlled trial was performed according to the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials) criteria. The inclusion criteria were patients over 18 years of age with complex stones. SUP was performed in the Barts flank-free modified position. Except for positioning, all the surgical parameters were identical. The primary outcome was the difference in the success rate on the first postoperative day (POD1) between groups. The secondary outcome was the difference in the stone-free rate (SFR) on the 90th postoperative day (final SFR). A noninferiority margin of 15% was used. Demographic, operative, and safety variables were compared between the groups. Statistical significance was set at p

OBJECTIVES Compare color Doppler (Color) ultrasound-guided puncture to common type-B (Type-B) ultrasound-guided puncture in reducing the incidence of hemorrhagic complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 348 patients who received PCNL from September 2017 to December 2018 were divided into Color (231 cases) and Type-B groups (117 cases). The avascular area of the target fornix was pinpointed in the Color group while the middle of the target fornix was the default puncture point in the Type-B group. Tract bleeding, nephrostomy tract creation time, operation time, postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) values and serum creatinine (Scr) concentrations, and stone-free rates were analyzed. RESULTS Color Doppler imaging revealed that 35.1% of the cases in the Color group (81/231) had variable artery positioning in the target fornix. Tract bleeding and postoperative Hb reduction in the Color group were significantly lower than the Type-B group (10.8% vs 24.8%, P=0.0007, and 4.87±8.58 vs 7.70±8.90 g/L, P=0.0044, respectively). The postoperative hospitalization of the Color group was also shortened (8.3±5.9 vs 9.7±3.0 d, P

Context Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been performed for decades and has gone through many refinements, there are still concerns regarding its more widespread utilization because of the long learning curve and the potential risk of severe complications. Many technical details are not included in the guidelines because of their nature and research protocol. Objective To achieve an expert consensus viewpoint on PCNL indications, preoperative patient preparation, surgical strategy, management and prevention of severe complications, postoperative management, and follow-up. Evidence acquisition An international panel of experts from the Urolithiasis Section of the European Association of Urology, International Alliance of Urolithiasis, and other urology associations was enrolled, and a prospectively conducted study, incorporating literature review, discussion on research gaps (RGs), and questionnaires and following data analysis, was performed to reach a consensus on PCNL. Evidence synthesis The expert panel consisted of 36 specialists in PCNL from 20 countries all around the world. A consensus on PCNL was developed. The expert panel was not as large as expected, and the discussion on RGs did not bring in more supportive evidence in the present consensus. Conclusions Adequate preoperative preparation, especially elimination of urinary tract infection prior to PCNL, accurate puncture with guidance of fluoroscopy and/or ultrasonography or a combination, keeping a low intrarenal pressure, and shortening of operation time during PCNL are important technical requirements to ensure safety and efficiency in PCNL. Patient summary Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been a well-established procedure for the management of upper urinary tract stones. However, according to an expert panel consensus, core technical aspects, as well as the urologist’s experience, are critical to the safety and effectiveness of PCNL.

Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is less morbid than open surgery, it still carries risks of significant complications as well as injury to the renal parenchyma. Flexible ureteroscopic stone removal, although causes no appreciable damage to the renal parenchyma, has limitations, most notably, a lower stone-free rate than PCNL. Advances in our knowledge regarding ureteral physiology combined with technical developments applied to ureteral access sheath deployment and size may well propel retrograde intrarenal surgery to the forefront of kidney stone removal, regardless of stone size or location.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the treatment of choice for large and complex renal stones. The technological advances over the past several decades gave birth to different varieties of minimally invasive PCNLs, including the mini-PCNL, ultra-mini PCNL, super mini-PCNL, and micro-PCNL, with indications being extended to stones even larger than 20 mm. This article provides an update of all these available techniques of miniaturized PCNL along with its anatomic and physiologic impact. This should assist urologists in providing a personalized approach to the patient based on various patient- and stone-related factors to provide the best of all available technology for treatment.

Background Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is a dangerous complication after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). We aimed to review the diag...

Context Although miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both options for treating >1 cm kidney stones, controversies exist on whether one is more effective and safer than the other. Objective To systematically appraise randomized trials comparing the effectiveness and safety of mPCNL and RIRS for treating >1 cm kidney stones. Evidence acquisition A systematic search on PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted in August 2020 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). Randomized trials comparing mPCNL and RIRS for >1 cm kidney stones, and reporting stone-free rate (SFR), hemoglobin drop, transfusion rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), and/or complications, were included. Evidence synthesis Eight studies compared mPCNL and RIRS, but one was not included due to its high risk of bias. SFR was higher for mPCNL (RR: 1.06 [95% coefficient interval {CI}, 1.01–1.10], p = 0.008). Hemoglobin drop was higher for mPCNL (mean difference [MD]: 0.35 [95% CI, 0.05–0.65] g/dl, p = 0.02); however, transfusion rates were similar (p = 0.44). Complication rate was similar between mPCNL and RIRS (p = 0.39), and the LOS was higher for mPCNL (MD: 1.11 [95% CI, 0.06–2.16] d, p = 0.04). A subgroup analysis of lower pole stones showed that SFR was higher for mPCNL (RR: 1.09 [95% CI, 1.00–1.19], p = 0.05). Conclusions Both approaches are effective and safe. Among these approaches, mPCNL has a higher SFR than RIRS for overall >1 cm renal and lower pole stones, but longer LOS, and a higher hemoglobin drop that does not translate into higher transfusion rates. Complications are comparable. Patient summary Randomized trials have evaluated whether miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery is more effective and safer for treating >1 cm stones. After comparing the stone-free rate, hemoglobin drop, transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, and complications between both the approaches, mPCNL was found to be slightly more effective, but both were equally safe.

Objective To evaluate whether there would be a difference in outcome when the smaller ultra mini 12 Fr sheath was used instead of the mini 16 Fr sheath for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in paediatric patients for stones less than 25 mm. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of patients who underwent PCNL in our hospital in a 2 year period from 2016 to 2018 by a single surgeon. PCNL was performed in a prone position and tract was dilated to the respective size using single step dilatation. Laser was used to fragment the stone. Stone-free outcome was defined as absence of stone fragment at 3 months on kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) X-ray. Results There were 40 patients in each group. Mean stone size was comparable between the two groups, (14.5 mm vs. 15.0 mm). The procedure was completed faster in the 16 Fr group compared to 12 Fr group, (24.5 min vs. 34.6 min). Stone clearance was highly successful in both groups (97.5% vs. 95%). There was no difference in complications between the two groups. The decrease in hemoglobin was minimal in both groups (0.2 g/dL vs. 0.3 g/dL). Conclusions We found that the success rates were similar in both mini PCNL and the smaller ultra-mini PCNL groups. No significant difference in bleeding was noted in our pilot study, however, operative time was longer in the ultra-mini group as compared to the mini sheath group.

Patients with chronic spinal cord injury suffer from a number of pathophysiological alterations that can lead to im-portant morbidity and mortality in the perioperative period. The diaphragmatic pacemaker is a device that enables pulmonary ventilation in patients with high cervical cord injuries and provides them with a better quality of life when compared to mechanical ventilation. We present here the clinical case of a patient with chronic spinal cord injury who used a diaphragmatic pacemaker, and who was scheduled for percutaneous nephrolithotomy and double-J stent implantation. The anesthesiologist should know the pathophysiological situation of these patients in order to provide a safe perioperatory care.

Introduction: Urinary tract infection (UTI) should be treated before percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). However, the most appropriate treatment strategy in patients with negative urine culture bu...

Purpose: Bleeding is the most dreadful and distressing complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, which can cause significant morbidity. Intravenous use of tranexamic acid to reduce bleeding complication is widely established. Our aim is to compare the result between the two groups using tranexamic acid intravenous and in irrigation solution. Materials and methods: A total of 160 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. Group 1 received 0.1% tranexamic acid solution (1000 mg in 1 L of irrigation solution (normal saline)). Group 2 received 1 g tranexamic acid intravenously in intraoperative period. Results: The mean estimated fall in haematocrit, mean estimated total blood loss and mean operative time in tranexamic acid irrigation group is significantly less compared to intravenous tranexamic acid group. No significant difference was found with regards to stone clearance. Conclusion: We found that tranexamic acid irrigation was safe and associated with reduced blood loss as compared to intravenous tranexamic acid.

Purpose: The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a previous standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Materials and Methods: Outcomes of RIRS performed from January 2017 to January 2020 in adult patients with residual stone fragments ≤20mm after a standard PCNL (Post-PCNL) and symptomatic adult patients with kidney stones ≤20mm (Control) were prospectively studied. Stone-free rate (SFR) was evaluated on a postoperative day 90 non-contrast computed tomography. Surgical complications based on Clavien-Dindo classification during the 90 days of follow-up were recorded. Results: Outcomes of 55 patients and 57 renal units of the post-PCNL group were compared to 92 patients and 115 renal units of the control group. SFR was lower in post-PCNL group than in control (28/57, 49.1% vs. 86/115, 74.8%, p

This study aimed at investigating the efficacy and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in treatment of renal pelvic stone larger than 2 cm against the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Between March 2018 and December 2020, 121 patients were randomized to undergo PCNL (60 patients), or RIRS (61 patients). Both groups were compared in terms of operative time, intraoperative complications. Postoperative complications were assessed based on Clavien-Dindo grading system. Stone-free rates were evaluated by CT scan 6 weeks after surgery. No significant difference were observed between both groups in perioperative criteria. The main operative time was slightly longer in PCNL group (105 vs 95 min, p = 0.49). Stone clearance was higher in PCNL, yet the difference was not significant. (53 patients in PCNL group had either complete clearance or residual fragments

AIM To determine the possibility of performing minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under ultrasound guidance with the use of X-ray during the access tract formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS The results of 102 mini-PNL procedures, performed by a single surgeon during the period 2018-2019, were analyzed retrospectively. In the beginning, ureteral catheter Ch5 was put into an ipsilateral ureter. Further, a puncture of the collecting system was performed with an advancement of the guidewire. At the next stage, a dilation of tract was done using X-ray guidance for the safe formation of the working channel, followed by holmium lithotripsy. At the end a nephrostomy or JJ-stent was left. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 53.13+/-12.9, while average BMI was 29.3+/-6.5. In total, there were 44.1% of women. The average stone size was 20.7+/-10.9 mm; 45.1% of stones were left-sided. Staghorn stones accounted for 15.7% of cases and hydronephrosis was found in 18.6% of patients. The time for creating renal access, dilation of the nephrostomy tract, total operative time and fluoroscopy time were: 19.6+/-13.1, 7.7+/-4.2, 107.7+/-49.9, 57.1+/-41.2 minutes, respectively. In the Group I there were 32 (31.4%) patients undergoing to PCNL under X-ray guidance, while in Group II (n=70, 68.6%) combined US+/-X-ray control was used. The patients age (52.2+/-12.6 vs 53.6+/-13.2, p

In the past two decades, endourological procedures such as ureteroscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) have become the mainstay of managing kidney stone disease (KSD), with URS also used for investigating upper urinary tract lesions. Post-endourological infections affect between 1% and 6% of cases. Numerous risk factors have been identified, including longer operative times and indwelling ureteric stents, but the literature is largely heterogeneous. Identification of risk factors preoperatively include the use of pre-operative urine culture, minimizing stent dwell time and targeted antibiotic use. Intraoperatively, efforts need to be made in minimizing operative times and intra-renal pressures. Although rare, urinary tract infections following endourological procedures remain a risk, with a smaller minority developing potentially deadly urosepsis. Clinical decisions on prevention and treatment of severe sepsis have to be individualized based on the risk factors. Machine learning techniques are currently being utilized to build these tools and might provide an answer in the future.

Objective: To compare grade I complication as per Clavien-Dindo classification in patients undergoing standard (with tube) verses tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Study design: Hospital based randomized control study. Place and Duration of Study: Urology Clinic, Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation Karachi from 3rd June 2016 to 2nd December 2016. Methodology: Seventy four patients (37patients) in each group were enrolled. In group 1 patients, a 20 F nephrostomy tube were placed in the kidney over the guide wire, which was removed later. Group II patients had antegrade placement of a Double-J stent without nephrostomy and the wound compressed for 5min. The demographic like age, gender and complications grade I complications according to Clavian-Dindo classification were noted. Results: The mean age was 49.42±7.06 years. There were 46 (62.16%) males and 28 (37.84%) females. There was no significant difference in stone clearance rate between the groups; 91.9% in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomyg roup and 94.6% in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy group. Need for analgesics for pain control was high in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy group 86.5% versus 64.9% in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy group (p=0.03). Frequency of urine leakage was 18.9% in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy group and only 2.7% in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy group (p=0.02). Conclusion: Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedure has fewer complications as per Clavien-Dindo classification regarding need for analgesics and urine leakage. In suitable cases, the tubeless procedure can be safely used as the standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Keywords: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), Clavien-Dindo classification, Complication

Objective: The prone position for percutaneous nephrolithomy (PCNL) has been widely practiced. There has been a shift from prone position to supine position which showed numerous benefits. The aim of our study is to describe the 5 year experience from the perspective of a tertiary care center using a modified Galdakao supine Valdivia position for total tubeless ultra mini supine PCNL, total tubeless supine PCNL, tubeless supine PCNL, and standard supine PCNL. Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 90 patients who underwent supine PCNL at the tertiary care center during the period of 5 years from January 2017 to January 2021. The data collection was done from patients’ medical records. Pre operatively, complete examination of the patients with laboratory investigations were done. The modified Clavien classification system was used to classify the perioperative complications of PCNL. Results: Operative time was lowest for ultra mini supine PCNL (50 ± 10.4 min) compared to standard supine PCNL (58 ± 11.2 min). Stones were single in 54 patients and multiple in 40 patients with 4 patients with staghorn stones. The size of the stones in the largest dimension ranged from 1.2 to 5.5 cm.Complete clearance was achieved in 84 (89.7%) patients. Seven patients (7.2%) developed mild fever and four patients (4.5%) required blood transfusion. Conclusion: We found supine PCNL to be an immensely convenient, time-saving practice, and with higher stone free rate compared to prone PCNL. The different techniques of supine PCNL were also useful in patients with horseshoe kidney and calyceal diverticulum which resulted in good outcomes in these patients.

Purpose: To investigate the influence of bimanual compression of abdomen-flank to control bleeding after completion of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) including tubeless PCNL. Materials and methods: This study is a parallel-group randomized clinical trial with 1:1:1 randomization. Ninety patients who were candidates for PCNL during July to October 2019 were enrolled. After completion of PCNL operation, patients were randomized into three groups to receive bimanual abdomen-flank compression for 0, 3, and 7 min by the operating surgeon with the opening of sealed envelopes (groups 0, 3, and 7 min afterwards). Preoperative, 24, and 48 h postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) and electrolytes were collected. The primary endpoint of interest was the comparison of 48-h blood loss across study groups. Secondary endpoints included the percent drop in 24- and 48-h Hb, transfusion rates, and operation complications. This trial is registered at www.irct.ir with the following number: IRCT20190618043925N1 on 18 July 2019. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in study groups regarding stone mass, stone location, access location, and patients’ age (all p > 0.05). The medians (IQR) of 48-h blood loss were 490 mL (105–916), 338 mL (160–933), and 413 mL (71–650) in groups of 0, 3, and 7 min. The percent drop in 24-h postoperative Hb relative to preoperative Hb were 11.5 ± 8.6% versus 9.2 ± 7.3% versus 9.3 ± 6.8% ( p = 0.44) and relative values for the percent drop in 48-h Hb relative to preoperative Hb were 8.6 ± 8.7% versus 9.5 ± 9.9% versus 7.2 ± 9.6% ( p = 0.63) in groups of 0, 3, and 7 min respectively. Transfusion was needed in four patients in group 0 min, five patients in group 3 min, and three patients in group 7 min. Conclusions: The results of this study reveal that postoperative bimanual compression of abdomen-flank has no statistically significant influence on the control of bleeding after PCNL operations.

Objective. To investigate the efficacy and safety of the oblique supine lithotomy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) to treat upper urinary calculi. Methods. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed for 371 patients with upper urinary calculi who underwent PCNL at The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine from January 2017 to October 2020. Based on different positions, patients were divided into the observation group (oblique supine lithotomy position, 155 cases, Group 1) or control group (prone position, 216 cases, Group 2). Groups were compared for effectiveness, complications, bleeding, surgical time, clinical indicators, and hospitalization time. Results. There were no significant differences in the clinical baseline data between the two groups ( p > .05). However, the stone-free rate for patients was significantly higher in the observation than in the control group ( p < .05). Both operation time and hospital stay time were significantly lower in the observation versus the control groups ( p < .05). No significant differences were observed for complications or amount of blood loss ( p > .05). Conclusion. In patients with upper urinary calculi, percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the oblique supine lithotomy position has a higher stone-free rate than the prone position. This approach can shorten the operation and provide better comfort and quicker recovery to the patients. A further advantage is that there is no difference in safety and blood loss between the prone position and the oblique lithotomy position.

Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare the success and complication rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in obese patients with staghorn renal stones. Material and Methods: Between January 2012 and December 2017, 183 patients who had single access PCNL for staghorn renal calculi were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups according to body mass index (BMI). The patients with BMI < 30 kg/mm2 and >30 kg/mm2 were defined group-1 and group-2, respectively. Among the groups, we compared demographic characteristics, perioperative and postoperative datas. Postoperatively, >4 mm stone was identified as residual fragment. Complications were classified according to the Clavien scoring system. Results: In our study, there were 127 and 56 patients with staghorn renal calculi in the Group-1 and Group-2, respectively. The mean BMI were 24.5±2.7 kg/mm2 and 32.3±2.2 kg/ mm2 in the Group-1 and Group-2, respectively ( p=0.001). The number of patients with metabolic syndrome was also statistically significant higher in group-2 ( p=0.001). The mean stone size were 848±302 mm2 and 1020±197 mm2 in the Group-1 and Group-2, respectively ( p=0.535). Operation, nephroscopy and fluoroscopy times were similar between the groups (p=0.800, p=0.123, p=0.107 respectively). When we evaluated the postoperative results, stone-free rates were 55.6% and 62.5% in group-1 and group-2, respectively (p=0.381). Total complication rates were 38.9% and 33.9% in group-1 and group-2, respectively (p = 0.523). Investigating the subgroups of complications according to the Clavien scoring system, the rate of minor complications were 27.6% and 25.0% in the group-1 and group-2, respectively and this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.697). Major complication rates were 11.0% and 8.9% in the group-1 and group-2, respectively (p=0.657). Conclusion: PCNL is an effective and safe treatment method for staghorn stones in obese patients. Keywords: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Staghorn renal calculi, Clavien scoring system, obesity, body mass index.

Hounsfield units (HU) are a measure of radiodensity, related to the density of a tissue and the composition of kidney stones. Hounsfield density is what is related to the composition of kidney stones. In the standard acquisition method, these measures are arbitrary and dependent on the operator. This study describes the implementation of a technique based on the HU and Hounsfield density to predict the stone compositions of patients with nephrolithiasis. By conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy, thirty kidney stone samples corresponding to the cortex, middle, and nucleus were obtained. The HU were obtained by CT scanning with a systematic grid. Hounsfield density was calculated as the HU value divided by the stone’s greatest diameter (HU/mm). With that method and after analyzing the samples by IR-spectroscopy, anhydrous uric acid and ammonium magnesium phosphate were identified as the compounds of kidney stones. Additionally, anhydrous uric acid, magnesium ammonium phosphate, and calcium oxalate monohydrate were identified via Hounsfield density calculation. The study identified HU ranges for stone compounds using a systematic technique that avoids bias in its analysis. In addition, this work could contribute to the timely diagnosis and development of personalized therapies for patients with this pathology.

Introduction: Pain is important morbidity following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Various adjunctive procedures such as intercostals nerve block (ICNB) have been described to reduce post-operative pain. The aim of this review was to determine the analgesic efficacy of ICNB in PNL patients. Materials and Methods: Systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant publications. We followed preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines while conducting this review. Results: In this review, five randomized studies with 319 patients were included. The analgesic requirement was statistically similar in ICNB and control group (Standard mean difference (SMD) -0.48 confidence interval (CI)[-1.4, 0.44] p=0.31) whereas analgesic requirement was lower for peritubal infiltration group (PTI) as compared to ICNB (SMD 0.85 CI[0.25,1.44] p=0.005). Also, time to first analgesic requirement was similar between ICNB and PTI (SMD 0.86 CI[-9.3,11.0]), p=0.87). Pain according to VAS (visual analog scale) and Dynamic VAS (DVAS) at 24 hours was lower in ICNB group as compared to the control group; however, only DVAS at 24 hours was statistically significant. DVAS and VAS at 24 hours were similar for both ICNB and PTI. Conclusions: Intercostal nerve block in terms of analgesic requirement appears to be inferior to peritubal block and no better than control group. Also, mean pain scores for ICNB were similar to control group and peritubal block. Keywords: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Intercostal nerve block, Peritubal block, PNL, PCNL.

The presence of lower pole stones poses a unique challenge due to the anatomical considerations involved in their management and treatment. Considerable research has been performed to determine the optimal strategy when faced with this highly relevant clinical scenario. Standard options for management include observation, shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, or percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Indeed, each approach confers a distinct set of risks and benefits, which must be placed into the context of patient preference and expected outcomes. The current state of practice reflects a combination of lessons learned from managing calculi not only in the lower pole, but also from other locations within the kidney as well.

Background Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a complex surgery and has a flat learning curve. Due to this and the ethical issues, trainees do not get enough hands on exposure. Virtual simulator is very expensive and bulky. Animal model requires legal clearance. This inexpensive portable homemade PERC Mentor (IPHOM) teaches all the major aspects of PCNL surgery. This article has shown the way to make this model and its validation study. Methods IPHOM can be made at home with carton box, ball bearings, LED torch and some hospital wastes. After a short demonstration of IPHOM, 14 residents and 4 urologists were given 8 tasks to perform on it followed by 15-min supervised practice exercise on day 0 and day 1. Their performance was reassessed on day 2 and 3. Response to 17 feedback points was recorded on a seven-point Likert scale. Results There was significant difference between the performance of expert and novice on day 0. Expert completed all the tasks in less time and no. of attempts. The time for tract dilatation and duration of radiation exposure were significantly less in the expert group. The performance of both expert and novice improved on day 2 and 3, but the improvement was significantly more in novice. Response to the feedback points showed no difference between expert and novice (p > .05). Conclusions We have found that training on IPHOM has improved the concept and skills of PCNL in residents. The simplicity and low cost of the model make it constructible at home.

Purpose: To compare preoperative midstream urine cultures (PMUC) and renal pelvic urine culture (RPUC) or stone culture (SC) in predicting systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and uroseps...

Background and Aims: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the procedure of choice for managing large renal calculi. Although minimally invasive, it is associated with pain due to dilatation of renal capsule, parenchymal tract, and nephrostomy tube placement. Gender differences in pain perception and analgesic requirement have not been studied in PCNL surgeries. This study was done to evaluate the influence of gender on pain. Material and Methods: It was a prospective observational study including 60 ASA physical status I and II patients. The number of males and females were 29 and 31, respectively. Analgesic requirement and postoperative pain score were assessed by visual and dynamic visual analog scales (VAS, DVAS) score fourth hourly for first 24 h. Rescue analgesia was IV paracetamol 1 g when pain score exceeded four. VAS scores were assessed using Mann–Whitney test. Rescue analgesia was calculated as frequency and proportions. A P value of

Review based on the analysis of more than 40 scientific papers published in the Pubmed and Medline databases from 1984 to 2019, dedicated to intraoperative hemostasis of the percutaneous tract and its tightness during nephrostomyfree percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The article aimed to summarize scientific data on this issue. We presented information about the history and development of percutaneous surgery in the treatment of urolithiasis. In our review, we have been demonstrated various methods of surgical and intraoperative hemostasis during nephrostomy-free PCNL.

Objective In second-stage percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), because the hydronephrosis has been decompressed, the dilated renal pelvis has resolved and the space is small. Consequently, introduction of the tip of the Amplatz dilator can cause injury to the opposite side of the renal-pelvic mucosa. In this study, we report the experimental and initial clinical performance of a spherical-headed fascial dilator developed specifically for second-stage PCNL. Methods The novel spherical-headed dilator was compared with existing tapered-headed dilators in configuration and in puncture resistance utilizing a static puncture test. Subsequently, a pilot clinical study was conducted during which patients scheduled to undergo second-stage PCNL from June 2019 to October 2019 in our center were enrolled. A typical ultrasound guided PCNL procedure was performed with the exception that the new spherical-headed fascial dilator was substituted for a tapered-headed one. Results Experimentally, stab resistance against polyethylene film was significantly increased using the novel spherical-headed dilator compared to the traditional tapered-headed dilators (p

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is a widely used surgical method for renal stone management. However, it can be associated with several complications. Case: We report an acute hemothorax during PNL in 57-year-old male patient with a stone. After observing air bubbles at the diaphragm on the laparoscopic screen, we considered pulmonary complications. A chest radiograph demonstrated a shade that measured 130 mm wide and 70 mm long and fluid retention on the right side of the chest. During drainage of 200 ml of blood through a chest tube, the patient’s vital signs became unstable. After the patient received hydration and intravenous injection of vasopressor, his vital signs stabilized. Conclusions: Pulmonary complications due to pleural injury during PNL can result in death, but the complications can be managed by early diagnosis and treatment. Close cooperation between surgeon and anesthesiologist and routine chest radiographs after PNL can reduce the pulmonary complications.

Рurpose. To increase the treatment eff ectiveness of patients with various forms of nephrolithiasis based on the development and integration of interdisciplinary approaches to the choice of surgical access. Materials and methods. The study was based on clinical and laboratory data and the results of surgical treatment of 133 patients with various forms of urolithiasis. Results. The analysis of complications of percutaneous surgery is shown by the example of 133 patients with various forms of nephrolithiasis, who underwent PCNL (percutaneous nephrolithotomy). The inclusion of highly informative methods of visualization of urinary stones, multispiral computed tomography with 3D-visualization and densitometry namely in the algorithm of examination of patients with nephrolithiasis is justifi ed. The possibilities of interventional radiology in the elimination of hemorrhagic complications of percutaneous surgery of urolithiasis, including staghorn nephrolithiasis, are presented. Conclusion. The eff ectiveness of the creation of multidisciplinary surgical teams, including specialists in the fi eld of interventional radiology, for the interpretation of diagnostic results, as well as the prevention and elimination of intra- and postoperative hemorrhagic complications, is proven.

Renal stones are the third most common problem affecting about 10% of global population. The management of nephrolithiasis has undergone a complete transformation since the 1980s. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has established itself an effective and safe technique that delivers high stone-free rate as well as overall shorter treatment time. We aim to compare the outcome of mini-PCNL with standard-PCNL in patients presenting with renal stones. In all, 90 patients fulfilled the selection criteria and randomized into two groups. Group A underwent mini-PCNL whereas Group B underwent standard-PCNL. Pre-operative hemoglobin level was recorded. Duration of procedure as well as drop in hemoglobin level was also recorded. A kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) X-ray was performed to confirm the presence of of stone and stone-free status. The mean age of patients in mini-PCNL group was 43.11 years and in standard-PCNL group, it was 36.91 years. The mean stone size in patients of mini-PCNL group was 29.53 mm and 31.58 mm in standard-PCNL group. The mean duration of renal stone in mini-PCNL group was 1.91 years and that in standard-PCNL group 1.80 years. The mean operative time in mini-PCNL group was 59.56 min and 61.22 min in standard-PCNL group. The mean fall in hemoglobin in mini-PCNL group was 0.38 g/dL and that in standard-PCNL group 0.51 g/dL. In mini-PCNL group, stone clearance was observed in 42 (93.3%) patients, while in standard-PCNL group, it was observed in 45 (100%) patients. This difference was insignificant (P > 0.05). Mini-PCNL and standard-PCNL have no significant differences in terms of outcome, operative time, and stone clearance, although fall in hemoglobin level was less in mini-PCNL group, which showed less blood loss in this group, thereby making it a more appropriate method for renal stone removal.

AIM to assess the possibility of using neural network algorithms in choosing a method for surgical treatment of urolithiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS treatment results of 625 patients with kidney stones were analyzed in the study. Information about each patient was presented in the form of a multidimensional vector characterized by following preoperative investigations: questionnaires, clinical examination, instrumental and laboratory studies. A register was created where information on more than 50 parameters for each patient was added. Each example has an output parameter representing a predefined treatment strategy (extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy [ESWL] - 1, percutaneous nephrolithotomy [PCNL] - 2, pyelolithotomy or nephrolithotomy - 3). The initial database served as the basis for training the neural network estimation technique. RESULTS A prospective trial was conducted to assess the clinical efficiency of the recommendations of neural network. A cohort of 150 patients admitted to the urology department was divided into two groups of 75 people. In the group 1, patients received treatment according to the standard recommendations. In group 2, treatment strategy was chosen based on the results of neural network analysis. In the group 1, ESWL was performed in 40 (53.3%) patients. The average number of sessions was 1.8. At the discharge, residual fragments were diagnosed in 12 (30%) cases. In 4 patients, acute pyelonephritis developed, which required performing ureteral catheterization and subsequent treatment. In group 1, the efficiency of ESWL was 75%. In the group 2, where the neural network assessment technique was used, the average number of sessions was 1.4. At the discharge, 7 (15.6%) patients had residual fragments: 4 in the kidney, in 3 in the lower ureter ("steinstrasse"). In 4 cases, a conversion for PCNL was performed. ESWL efficiency was 91.1%. Stone-free rate for ESWL in the second group was significantly higher due to the greater number of stone fragmentation. In addition, number of shock waves was lower (the average number of sessions was 0.4 less). Improvement of treatment tactics through the use of neural network algorithms led to a decrease in hospitalization times, as well as to an improvement in the quality of treatment. The low efficiency of ESWL, as the first-line method, led to a change in treatment tactics in 25% of patients in group 1 and only in 8.9% of patients in group 2. Using these algorithms, it was possible to reduce hospitalization time, need for changing treatment strategy, number of auxiliary procedures, readmission rates, the incidence of inflammatory complications, and the number of residual fragments after ESWL. CONCLUSIONS The possibility of using the neural network prediction technique at the preoperative stage in patients with kidney stones has been shown. This technique allows practicing urologist to make a decision on the choice of the optimal treatment method on an individual basis, thereby minimizing the risk of early postoperative complications.

Urosepsis usually develops from a community or nosocomial acquired urinary tract infection (UTI) or during the procedure of various urinary disease such ureterorenoscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Urosepsis is associated with bacteriuria, Urosepsis due to manipulation during or after percuteneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or ureterorenoscopy (URS) or push bang stenting can be catastrophic despite prophylactie antibiotic coverage. This cross sectional study was carried out in Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh during the period of July 2011 to June 2013. Sampling technique was purposive and sample size was 70. Among them 23 patients for PCNL and 47 patients for URS were selected by selection criteria. Data were collected by interview of the patients, clinical examinations and laboratory investigations using the research instrument. Data were processed and analyzed using software SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 11.5. Incidence of bacteriuria and urosepsis were measured according to urine and blood culture report. Sensitivity pattern was also observed. According to this study, the incidence of bacteriuria and urosepsis were 17.1% and 5.7% respectively, Of the 70 patients, 12(17.1%) exhibited bacterial growth on urine culture, These 12 patients were then subjected to blood culture and 4(33.3%) of them were found positive. Most (83.4%) of the urine and blood infections (75%) were caused by E. coli. Some widely used antibiotics like moxicillin, Cephalexin and Ciprofloxacin were found 100% resistant in urine culture. Few sensitive antibiotics were Tobramycin (100 %), Amikacin and Ceftazidime (75%). Almost same sensitivity pattern was found in blood culture. In urosepsis, as in other types of sepsis. Urosepsis after PCNL and URS is an important and potentially catastrophic complication. Percuteneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), Ureterorenoscopy (URS) occurs frequently in this institution. Although the incidence of urosepsis and bacteriuria with resistant organism is low, but it is a burning issue in management in urology practice. The apparent increase in ciprofloxacin resistant organisms appears to be associated with the increased rate of ciprofloxacin resistant organisms are observed in the general population.

Objective To assess the effect of lower and middle calyceal accesses on the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in staghorn stones. Study design Observational study. Place and duration of study Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Turkey, from April 2012 to January 2019. Methodology Patients who underwent PCNL for staghorn stones were retrospectively analysed. The patients were grouped as Group-1 (middle calyceal access) and Group-2 (lower calyceal access). Demographic and stone characteristics (size, density), perioperative and postoperative data, and stone-free rates were compared between these two groups. Postoperative detection of > 4 mm stones was defined as residual stones. Results There were 249 patients in the study; 108 in middle calyceal access group and 141 in lower calyceal access group. The mean stone burden was 765 (524-1322) and 777 (490-1445) mm2 in group-1 and group-2, respectively (p=0.876). The number of stone-free patients was 50 (46.3%) in middle calyceal access group and 93 (66.0%) in lower calyceal access group. The rate of stone-free status was significantly higher in lower calyceal access group (p=0.002). The overall complication rate was similar between the groups (p=0.132). The binary analysis showed that stone burden, and calyx of entry were predictive factors for success. Conclusion Although the choice of the calyx to be entered does not affect the complication rate in staghorn stones, the stone-free rate is significantly higher in lower calyceal access. Key Words: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Staghorn stones, Clavien scoring system, Calyx, Access.

While percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the treatment modality of choice for kidney stones larger than 2 cm, infectious complications are most common, ranging from 5% to 32%. We present h...

BACKGROUND: Some types of complex kidney stones cannot be broken down and removed through single-channel percutaneous nephroscope or retrograde flexible ureteroscope. In order to be removed, these types of stones require multiple combined methods to be performed. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical effect of single-channel minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) combined with retrograde flexible ureteroscopy using the completely lateral decubitus and semi-lithotomy positions for treating complex renal calculi. METHODS: We selected 117 patients with complex renal calculi who were admitted to Peking University Shougang Hospital and Weifang People’s Hospital from January 1, 2017, to January 31, 2021. All patients were treated with single-channel mPCNL combined with retrograde flexible ureteroscopy in the completely lateral decubitus and semi-lithotomy positions. During the operation, the patients were placed in a completely lateral decubitus position, or their lower limbs were placed in a semi-lithotomy position for a single attempt only. RESULTS: An 18-Fr percutaneous channel was successfully established in all patients. The mean operation time was 112±37 minutes, and the average blood loss was 71±31 mL. A 14-Fr renal fistula was maintained for 7 days, a urethral catheter for 2–3 days, and a ureteral stent tube for 2 weeks after each surgery. According to the results of computed tomography (CT) scans performed 3–5 days after the operation, the total lithotripsy success rate reached 100%, with a first-stage lithotripsy rate of 98.29%. Two patients were found to each have 1 residual stone, with a diameter of 4 mm, left in kidney by CT, which then was to be removed under local anesthesia. The average postoperative hospitalized time was 7±2 days, and no severe complications occurred perioperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Single-channel mPCNL combined with retrograde flexible ureteroscopy in the completely lateral decubitus and semi-lithotomy positions is a safe, feasible, and highly effective method of treating complex renal calculi, which is of benefit to save operation time and facilitate operation process, because patient’s position could not need to be changed repeatedly during the surgery.

Introduction: Currently, there are multiple intracorporeal lithotripters available for use in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of two novel lithotripters: Trilogy and ShockPulse-SE. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective multi-institutional randomized trial comparing outcomes of PCNL using two novel lithotripters between February 2019 and June 2020. The study assessed objective measures of stone clearance time, stone clearance rate, device malfunction, stone-free rates, and complications. Device assessment was provided through immediate postoperative survey by primary surgeons. Results: There were 100 standard PCNLs completed using either a Trilogy or ShockPulse-SE lithotrite. Using quantitative Stone Analysis Software to estimate stone volume, the mean stone volume was calculated at 4.18 ± 4.79 and 3.86 ± 3.43 cm3 for the Trilogy and ShockPulse-SE groups, respectively. Stone clearance rates were found to be 1.22 ± 1.67 and 0.77 ± 0.68 cm3/min for Trilogy vs ShockPulse-SE (p = 0.0542). When comparing Trilogy to ShockPulse-SE in a multivariate analysis, total operative room time (104.4 ± 48.2 minutes vs 121.1 ± 59.2 minutes p = 0.126), rates of secondary procedures (17.65% vs 40.81%, p = 0.005), and device malfunctions (1.96% vs 34.69%, p

Background With the heterogeneous distribution of novel surgical technologies and variable physician training, there is a need to re-evaluate contemporary outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for complex staghorn stones. Objective To evaluate contemporary outcomes of guideline-supported treatment for patients with staghorn kidney stones using single-access PCNL in multiple North American centers. Design, setting and participants We performed a multi-institutional retrospective review of staghorn stones managed from January 1, 2017 to January 1, 2019, inclusive. We excluded patients with more than a single percutaneous access per renal unit and those who underwent a concomitant contralateral procedure. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Safety (Clavien-Dindo complications) and efficacy in terms of a strictly defined stone-free rate were examined for single-access PCNL performed on staghorn stones with a Guy’s stone score of 3–4. Results and limitations We evaluated 301 patients meeting the inclusion criteria with an average age of 57 yr (range 18–87). All stones had a Guy’s stone score of 3 (36.2%) or 4 (63.8%). The mean (± standard deviation) stone burden was 191.4 ± 49.8 mm2. Of the 297 patients (98.6%) who underwent computed tomography on postoperative day 1, 132 (44.4%) showed no residual stone, 111 (37.3%) had a largest fragment Conclusions Single-access PCNL for complex staghorn stones is safe and effective. High stone-free rates with minimal morbidity are achievable with current techniques. Patient summary This study confirms that single-access percutaneous nephrolithotomy provides excellent outcomes in the treatment of complex kidney stones. This surgical technique has both safe and effective outcomes that are reproducible across multiple centers in North America.