1. When misinterpreting the Bible becomes a habit
- Author
-
Peet J. Van Dyk
- Subjects
Hermeneutics ,lcsh:BS1-2970 ,media_common.quotation_subject ,0603 philosophy, ethics and religion ,lcsh:The Bible ,Cosmology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Cognitive Frameworks ,media_common ,Literature ,060303 religions & theology ,business.industry ,Philosophy ,Religious studies ,030229 sport sciences ,06 humanities and the arts ,Mythology ,Magic (paranormal) ,lcsh:BV1-5099 ,lcsh:Practical Theology ,Gadamer ,business ,Magic - Abstract
Ancient Near Eastern (ANE) texts should be interpreted against the background of the magico-mythical cosmology of their time, and the Bible is no exception. Earlier scholars were, however, hesitant to recognise this reality as a result of disagreement over how to define myths and because of the problematic idealistic framework that they followed. This framework viewed biblical religion as superior to other ANE religions and thus devoid of myths and the belief in magic. It is, however, argued that the Bible contains both myths and a belief in magic and shares the overarching ANE cosmology. The incompatibility of the scientific cosmology and the magico-mythical cosmology of the ANE causes special problems for modern readers. To prevent modern readers from habitually falling back on their scientific cosmology, and thereby misinterpreting the Bible, it is suggested that a cosmological approach should form the basic framework for all biblical hermeneutics.
- Published
- 2021