1. Contralateral training effects of low-intensity blood-flow restricted and high-intensity unilateral resistance training
- Author
-
Goncalo V. Mendonca, Sandro R. Freitas, André D. Gonçalves, Pedro Pezarat-Correia, Carolina Vila-Chã, Pedro Mil-Homens, and Carolina Teodósio
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Sports medicine ,Physiology ,Cross education ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Voluntary contraction ,Physiology (medical) ,Humans ,Medicine ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Muscle Strength ,Muscle, Skeletal ,Ultrasonography ,Electromyography ,business.industry ,High intensity ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Resistance training ,Resistance Training ,030229 sport sciences ,General Medicine ,Blood flow ,Constriction ,Healthy Volunteers ,Intensity (physics) ,Torque ,Anesthesia ,Female ,H-reflex ,business ,Biomarkers ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Muscle Contraction - Abstract
Determine whether unilateral low-intensity blood-flow restricted (LIBFR) exercise is as effective as high-intensity (HI) resistance training for improving contralateral muscle strength. Thirty healthy adults (20–30 years) were randomly allocated to the following dynamic plantar-flexion training interventions: HI [75% of one-repetition maximum (1RM), 4 sets, 10 reps] and LIBFR [20% of 1RM, 4 sets, 30 + 15 + 15 + 15 reps]. Evoked V-wave and H-reflex recruitment curves, as well as maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and panoramic ultrasound assessments of the trained and untrained soleus muscles were obtained pre-training, post-4 weeks of training and post-4 weeks of detraining. Both interventions failed to increase contralateral MVC and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA). Yet, contralateral rate of torque development (RTD) was enhanced by both regimens (12–26%) and this was accompanied by heightened soleus EMG within the first milliseconds of the rising torque-time curve (14–22%; p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF