1. How can we make self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infections and bloodborne viruses more inclusive? A qualitative study with people with mild learning disabilities and low health literacy
- Author
-
Paul Flowers, Melvina Woode Owusu, Alan Middleton, Maria Pothoulaki, Gabriele Vojt, Rebecca Laidlaw, Claudia Estcourt, and Fiona Mapp
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,sexual health ,Sexually Transmitted Diseases ,BF ,Health literacy ,Dermatology ,Specimen Handling ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Disabled Persons ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Qualitative Research ,Reproductive health ,Medical education ,Blood-Borne Infections ,030505 public health ,business.industry ,Learning Disabilities ,delivery of health care ,Health services research ,Middle Aged ,Partner notification ,Focus group ,Health Literacy ,Self Care ,Infectious Diseases ,Scotland ,Learning disability ,Female ,Health Services Research ,Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ,medicine.symptom ,patient participation ,0305 other medical science ,business ,Inclusion (education) ,Blood sampling - Abstract
Objectives1.5 million people in the UK have mild to moderate learning disabilities. STIs and bloodborne viruses (BBVs) are over-represented in people experiencing broader health inequalities, which include those with mild learning disabilities. Self-managed care, including self-sampling for STIs/BBVs, is increasingly commonplace, requiring agency and health literacy. To inform the development of a partner notification trial, we explored barriers and facilitators to correct use of an STI/BBV self-sampling pack among people with mild learning disabilities.MethodsUsing purposive and convenience sampling we conducted four interviews and five gender-specific focus groups with 25 people (13 women, 12 men) with mild learning disabilities (July–August 2018) in Scotland. We balanced deductive and inductive thematic analyses of audio transcripts to explore issues associated with barriers and facilitators to correct use of the pack.ResultsAll participants found at least one element of the pack challenging or impossible, but welcomed the opportunity to undertake sexual health screening without attending a clinic and welcomed the inclusion of condoms. Reported barriers to correct use included perceived overly complex STI/BBV information and instructions, feeling overwhelmed and the manual dexterity required for blood sampling. Many women struggled interpreting anatomical diagrams depicting vulvovaginal self-swabbing. Facilitators included pre-existing STI/BBV knowledge, familiarity with self-management, good social support and knowing that the service afforded privacy.ConclusionIn the first study to explore the usability of self-sampling packs for STI/BBV in people with learning disabilities, participants found it challenging to use the pack. Limiting information to the minimum required to inform decision-making, ‘easy read’ formats, simple language, large font sizes and simpler diagrams could improve acceptability. However, some people will remain unable to engage with self-sampling at all. To avoid widening health inequalities, face-to-face options should continue to be provided for those unable or unwilling to engage with self-managed care.
- Published
- 2021