1. The Effectiveness of Enhanced Primary Healthcare (EnPHC) Interventions on Type 2 Diabetes Management in Malaysia: Difference-in-differences (DID) Analysis
- Author
-
Sheamini Sivasampu, Rifat Atun, Swee Hung Ang, Nazrila Hairizan Nasir, Chee Lee Chan, Dian Kusuma, Ming Tsuey Lim, Yvonne Mei Fong Lim, Nor Idawaty Ibrahim, Noraziani Khamis, Masliyana Husin, Faeiz Syezri Adzmin Jaafar, Sunita Shanmugam, Xin Rou Teh, Su Miin Ong, Dennis Ross-Degnan, and Anita K. Wagner
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,business.industry ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Psychological intervention ,Primary health care ,Type 2 diabetes ,medicine.disease ,Difference in differences ,Text mining ,Family medicine ,Internal Medicine ,Medicine ,Family Practice ,business - Abstract
Background To evaluate the effectiveness of the Enhanced Primary Healthcare (EnPHC) interventions on process of care and intermediate clinical outcomes among type 2 diabetes patients. Research Design and Methods This was a quasi-experimental controlled study of multi-pronged interventions conducted in 20 intervention and 20 control public primary care clinics in Malaysia from November 2016 to June 2019. Malaysian patients aged 30 years and above with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes were selected via systematic random sampling. We conducted difference-in-differences analyses of data on process of care and intermediate clinical outcomes extracted from medical records. Results We reviewed 12,017 medical records of patients with type 2 diabetes. Process of care measures improved: HbA1c tests performed within the past three months (odds ratio (OR) 3.31, 95% CI 2.13, 5.13); lipid test (OR 4.59, 95% CI 2.64, 7.97), LDL (OR 4.33, 95% CI 2.16, 8.70), and urine albumin (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.12, 3.55) tests within the past year; BMI measured within the past six months (OR 15.80, 95% CI 4.78, 52.24); cardiovascular risk assessment (OR 174.65, 95% CI 16.84, 1810.80); and exercise counselling (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04, 1.33). We found no statistically significant changes in intermediate clinical outcomes. Conclusions EnPHC interventions were effective in improving process of care but not intermediate clinical outcomes for type 2 diabetes patients. The intervention package was successful in enhancing the quality of care in diabetes from the health provider perspective. Patient engagement and self-management support may be needed to bring forth changes in patient outcomes.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF