1. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT to evaluate tumor, nodal disease, and gross tumor volume of oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer: comparison with MR imaging and validation with surgical specimen
- Author
-
Markus Middendorp, Oliver Seitz, Rober Sader, Nicole Chambron-Pinho, Martin G. Mack, Thomas J. Vogl, and Sotirios Bisdas
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Aged ,Neoplasm Staging ,Retrospective Studies ,Neuroradiology ,Aged, 80 and over ,Mouth neoplasm ,PET-CT ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Cancer ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Oropharyngeal Neoplasms ,Positron emission tomography ,Lymphatic Metastasis ,Positron-Emission Tomography ,Female ,Mouth Neoplasms ,Histopathology ,Lymph Nodes ,Neurology (clinical) ,Tomography ,Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Nuclear medicine - Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the impact of adding combined 18F-PET/CT to MRI for T and N staging of the oral and oropharyngeal cancer and calculation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) having histopathology as reference standard.PET/CT and MRI were performed in 66 patients with suspected oral and oropharyngeal cancer (41 primary tumors/25 recurrent tumors) and nodal disease (114 nodes). Statistical analysis included the McNemar test, sensitivity, specificity for the diagnostic modalities as well as regression analysis, and Bland-Altman graphs for calculated tumor volumes.There was no statistically significant difference between the two modalities compared to pathological findings regarding detection of disease (Por =0.72). The sensitivity/specificity for tumor detection were 100/80% and 96.72/60% for MRI and PET/CT, respectively. The sensitivity/specificity for nodal metastases were 88.46/75% and 83.81/73.91% for MRI and PET/CT, respectively. In 18% of cases, the MRI-based T staging resulted in an overestimation of the pathologic tumor stage. The corresponding rate for PET/CT was 22%. Regarding the treated necks, both modalities showed 100% sensitivity for detection of the recurrent lesions. In necks with histologically N0 staging, MRI and PET/CT gave 22% and 26% false positive findings, respectively. The mean tumor volume in the pathologic specimen was 16.6 +/- 18.6 ml, the mean volume derived by the MR imaging was 17.6 +/- 19.1 ml while the estimated by PET/CT volume was 18.8 +/- 18.1 ml (Por =0.007 between the three methods). The Bland-Altman analysis showed a better agreement between PET/CT and MRI.The diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT in the local staging of oral cancer is not superior to MRI.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF