Search

Objectives Interleukin (IL)-1β blocking is effective for the treatment of gout flares and is recommended in patients with contraindications to the standard of care, such as stage 4–5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. However, efficacy and safety data regarding these agents are lacking in this population. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of anakinra for the treatment of gout flares in patients with stage 4–5 CKD or renal transplantation. Methods This retrospective study encompassing 3 academic centres included consecutive patients with stage 4–5 CKD or kidney transplantation who received anakinra for the treatment of acute gouty arthritis and completed at least one follow-up visit. Efficacy, occurrence of infection, and renal function variations were recorded. Results Of the 31 included patients (24 men, mean age 72 ± 11 years), 25 were non-transplant subjects with stage 4–5 CKD (mean estimated glomerular filtration rate, MDRD formula (eGFR) 22.7 ± 6.5 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), and six had undergone kidney transplantation (mean eGFR 41.5 ± 22.8 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). Median gout duration was 3.5 years, and the mean serum urate (SUA) level was 8.7 mg/dL. Twenty-one (68%) patients had tophi, and 21 had gout arthropathy. Anakinra was efficacious in all patients (final VAS 10 and CRP level 10 mg/L). Ten patients (32%) were anakinra dependent (i.e., required prolonged treatment with anakinra). A serious infection was recorded in only one patient, occurring 3 months after starting anakinra. No significant variation in renal function was observed. Conclusion Anakinra may be a safe therapeutic option for gout patients with advanced CKD. Further randomized controlled studies are required to confirm our results.

Objectives Systemic-onset JIA (SJIA) and adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) are the same sporadic systemic auto-inflammatory disease. SpA is a group of inflammatory non-autoimmune disorders. We report the observations of eight patients with SJIA/AOSD who also presented features of SpA during their disease evolution and estimate the prevalence of SpA in SJIA/AOSD. Methods This was a retrospective national survey of departments of paediatric and adult rheumatology and internal medicine. To be included, SJIA patients had to fulfil the ILAR criteria, AOSD patients the Yamaguchi or Fautrel criteria, and all patients the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axial or peripheral SpA, ESSG criteria for SpA or Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria for PsA. The data were collected with a standardized form. Results Eight patients (five adults) were identified in one paediatric and two adult departments. In all but one patient, SpA manifestations occurred several years after SJIA/AOSD onset [mean (s.d.) delay 6.2 (3.8) years]. Two patients had peripheral and three axial SpA, and four later exhibited PsA and one SAPHO syndrome. The prevalence of SpA in an adult cohort of 76 patients with AOSD was 6.58% (95% CI 2.17, 14.69), greater than the prevalence of SpA in the French general population (0.3%; 95% CI 0.17, 0.46). The prevalence of SpA in an SJIA cohort of 30 patients was 10% (95% CI 2.11, 26.53), more than that reported in the general population of industrialized countries, estimated at 0.016–0.15%. Conclusion While the temporal disassociation between SpA and AOSD in most cases might suggest a coincidental finding, our work raises the possibility of an SpA/AOSD spectrum overlap that needs further study.