Search

OBJECTIVE: To compare the responsiveness of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 index (BILAG-2004) and the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) disease activity indices and to determine whether there was any added value in combining BILAG-2004, BILAG-2004 system tally (BST), or simplified BST (sBST) with SLEDAI-2K. METHODS: This was a multicenter longitudinal study of SLE patients. Data were collected on BILAG-2004, SLEDAI-2K, and therapy on consecutive assessments in routine practice. The external responsiveness of the indices was assessed by determining the relationship between change in disease activity and change in therapy between 2 consecutive visits. Comparison of indices and their derivatives was performed by assessing the main effects of the indices using logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic curves analysis was used to describe the performance of these indices individually and in various combinations, and comparisons of area under the curve were performed. RESULTS: There were 1,414 observations from 347 patients. Both BILAG-2004 and SLEDAI-2K maintained an independent relationship with change in therapy when compared. There was some improvement in responsiveness when continuous SLEDAI-2K variables (change in score and score of previous visit) were combined with BILAG-2004 system scores. Dichotomization of BILAG-2004 or SLEDAI-2K resulted in poorer performance. BST and sBST had similar responsiveness as the combination of SLEDAI-2K variables and BILAG-2004 system scores. There was little benefit in combining SLEDAI-2K with BST or sBST. CONCLUSION: The BILAG-2004 index had comparable responsiveness to SLEDAI-2K. There was some benefit in combining both indices. Dichotomization of BILAG-2004 and SLEDAI-2K leads to suboptimal performance. BST and sBST performed well on their own; sBST is recommended for its simplicity and clinical meaningfulness.

Objectives The aim of this study was to explore the use of Bayesian networks (BNs) to understand the relationships between musculoskeletal symptoms and the development of PsA in people with psoriasis. Methods Incident cases of psoriasis were identified for 1998 to 2015 from the UK Clinical Research Practice Datalink. Musculoskeletal symptoms (identified by Medcodes) were concatenated into primary groups, each made up of several subgroups. Baseline demographics for gender, age, BMI, psoriasis severity, alcohol use and smoking status were also extracted. Several BN structures were composed using a combination of expert knowledge and data-oriented modelling based on: (i) primary musculoskeletal symptom groups; (ii) musculoskeletal symptom subgroups and (iii) demographic variables. Predictive ability of the networks using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated. Results Over one million musculoskeletal symptoms were extracted for the 90 189 incident cases of psoriasis identified, of which 1409 developed PsA. The BN analysis yielded direct relationships between gender, BMI, arthralgia, finger pain, fatigue, hand pain, hip pain, knee pain, swelling, back pain, myalgia and PsA. The best BN, achieved by using the more site-specific musculoskeletal symptom subgroups, was 76% accurate in predicting the development of PsA in a test set and had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.75). Conclusion The presented BN model may be a useful method to identify clusters of symptoms that predict the development of PsA with reasonable accuracy. Using a BN approach, we have shown that there are several symptoms which are predecessors of PsA, including fatigue, specific types of pain and swelling.

Objective.To determine the risk of a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) compared to patients with psoriasis and a general population cohort.Methods.Incident PsA patients aged 18–89 years at diagnosis were identified from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1998 and 2014. All patients with PsA were matched to 2 cohorts of patients, both at a 1:4 ratio. The first cohort included patients with psoriasis (and no PsA) and the second was a general population cohort (with no psoriasis or PsA). The baseline prevalence of OA was calculated for each study cohort. The incidence of OA was calculated, and adjusted relative risks (RRadj) were calculated using conditional Poisson regression.Results.We identified 6783 incident PsA patients. The baseline prevalence of OA ranged from 22.1% (95% CI 21.1–23.1) in the PsA cohort to 12.6% (95% CI 12.2–13.0) and 11.0% (95% CI 10.6–11.3) in the psoriasis and general population cohorts, respectively. The incidence of OA was significantly higher in the PsA cohort compared to the psoriasis and general population cohorts after adjusting for BMI (RRadj 1.68, 95% CI 1.46–1.93, and RRadj 1.86, 95% CI 1.62–2.14, respectively).Conclusion.An increased risk of OA was observed in patients with PsA compared to patients with psoriasis alone and those in the general population. Further work is needed to determine whether this reflects a true increase in OA risk or misdiagnosed PsA, and the extent to which it can be explained by differences in the opportunity for OA diagnosis between cohorts.

Objectives Uncertainty around clinical heterogeneity and outcomes for patients with JDM represents a major burden of disease and a challenge for clinical management. We sought to identify novel classes of patients having similar temporal patterns in disease activity and relate them to baseline clinical features. Methods Data were obtained for n = 519 patients, including baseline demographic and clinical features, baseline and follow-up records of physician’s global assessment of disease (PGA), and skin disease activity (modified DAS). Growth mixture models (GMMs) were fitted to identify classes of patients with similar trajectories of these variables. Baseline predictors of class membership were identified using Lasso regression. Results GMM analysis of PGA identified two classes of patients. Patients in class 1 (89%) tended to improve, while patients in class 2 (11%) had more persistent disease. Lasso regression identified abnormal respiration, lipodystrophy and time since diagnosis as baseline predictors of class 2 membership, with estimated odds ratios, controlling for the other two variables, of 1.91 for presence of abnormal respiration, 1.92 for lipodystrophy and 1.32 for time since diagnosis. GMM analysis of modified DAS identified three classes of patients. Patients in classes 1 (16%) and 2 (12%) had higher levels of modified DAS at diagnosis that improved or remained high, respectively. Patients in class 3 (72%) began with lower DAS levels that improved more quickly. Higher proportions of patients in PGA class 2 were in DAS class 2 (19%, compared with 16 and 10%). Conclusion GMM analysis identified novel JDM phenotypes based on longitudinal PGA and modified DAS.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an overview of recent discoveries related to myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and assays used for their measurement.RECENT FINDINGS: New autoantibody specificities have been reported including a MSA directed against eukaryotic initiation factor 3 and a myositis-associated autoantibody directed against heat shock factor 1. The association of anti-TIF1γ with cancer-associated dermatomyositis dependent on age has been confirmed in several large cohorts. Despite MSAs being almost entirely mutually exclusive, several myositis autoantigens are overexpressed in regenerating muscle and do not correlate with the corresponding MSA in any one patient. Further mechanisms may determine the final MSA specificity and are likely to include the need for autoantigen processing and presentation with adaptive T-cell help. The presence of CD4-positive T cells specific for histidyl tRNA synthetase protein in bronchial lavage fluid from antisynthetase patients lends support to this view. Finally, it is widely held that MSA do play an important role in clinical practice among some evidence and concern about commercial assay reliability.SUMMARY: MSAs continue to provide important tools for clinical diagnosis and management as well as insights into disease mechanisms. Further improvement in the standardization and reliability of routine detection of MSAs is a high priority.

Objective. Improving the assessment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a key purpose of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and PsA (GRAPPA). Herein, we report the proceedings of the GRAPPA composites workshop at the 2019 GRAPPA annual meeting and the membership’s recommended next steps. Methods. A review of continuous composite measures was conducted in an introductory workshop, followed by 10 breakout group sessions and a final plenary session for feedback and voting. Results. Participants included 154 members: 87 rheumatologists, 18 dermatologists, 2 rheumatologist/dermatologists, 12 patient research partners, 14 academics, 1 methodologist, and 20 industry members. Of voting members, 88.8% agreed a need exists for a continuous composite measure for routine practice, but only 62% were currently using a composite measure. Of these, 27% were using the 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS), which is not a PsA-specific measure; 20% were using a PsA-specific measure such as PsA DAS (PASDAS), Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (CPDAI), or Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA). Members agreed that the existing measures were not feasible in their current forms (CPDAI 83%, PASDAS 82%, and DAPSA 47%) and that modification should be tested. The majority (76%) agreed that disease effect should be measured separately from disease activity. Conclusion. The GRAPPA membership supports the need for a continuous composite measure of disease activity for use in routine clinical care, the separate measurement of disease effect and activity, and the testing of modifications to candidate instruments rather than the development of new measures.

Financially vulnerable, low-income individuals are more likely to experience financial exclusion as they are unable to access financial services that meet their needs. How do they cope with economic instability, and what is the role of social networks in their coping strategies? Using financial diaries, we explore the day-to-day monetary transactions (n = 16,889) of forty-five low-to-moderate income individuals with restricted access to mainstream lending in Glasgow, UK, over a six-month period. Our sample includes users of microcredit and financial advice, as well as nonusers of these services. Findings reveal that informal lending to avoid the pernicious effects of short-term illiquidity was pervasive among these individuals. However, taking informal loans often strains valuable social capital and keeps people from building up a formal credit footprint. Our findings suggest that financially vulnerable populations would benefit from policies that focus on alternative financial mechanisms to help stabilize income-insecure individuals in the short-term.

Objective.To investigate whether tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) combination therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) is more effective for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and/or improves TNFi drug survival compared to TNFi monotherapy.Methods.Five PsA biologics cohorts were investigated between 2000 and 2015: the ATTRA registry (Czech Republic); the Swiss Clinical Quality Management PsA registry; the Hellenic Registry of Biologics Therapies (Greece); the University of Bari PsA biologics database (Italy); and the Bath PsA cohort (UK). Drug persistence was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and equality of survival using log-rank tests. Comparative effectiveness was investigated using logistic regression with propensity scores. Separate analyses were performed on (1) the combined Italian/Swiss cohorts for change in rate of Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28); and (2) the combined Italian, Swiss, and Bath cohorts for change in rate of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ).Results.In total, 2294 patients were eligible for the drug survival analysis. In the Swiss (P = 0.002), Greek (P = 0.021), and Bath (P = 0.014) databases, patients starting TNFi in combination with methotrexate had longer drug survival compared to monotherapy, while in Italy the monotherapy group persisted longer (P = 0.030). In eligible patients from the combined Italian/Swiss dataset (n = 1056), there was no significant difference between treatment arms in rate of change of DAS28. Similarly, when also including the Bath cohort (n = 1205), there was no significant difference in rate of change of HAQ.Conclusion.Combination therapy of a TNFi with a csDMARD does not appear to affect improvement of disease activity or HAQ versus TNFi monotherapy, but it may improve TNFi drug survival.

Objectives In order to address the reliability of commercial assays to identify myositis-specific and -associated autoantibodies, we aimed to compare the results of two commercial immunoassays with the results obtained by protein immunoprecipitation. Methods Autoantibody status was determined using radio-labelled protein immunoprecipitation for patients referred to our laboratory for myositis autoantibody characterization. For each autoantibody of interest, the sera from 25 different patients were analysed by line blot (Euroline Myositis Antigen Profile 4, EuroImmun, Lübeck, Germany) and dot blot (D-Tek BlueDiver, Diagnostic Technology, Belrose, NSW, Australia). Sera from 134 adult healthy controls were analysed. Results Overall commercial assays performed reasonably well, with high agreement (Cohen’s κ >0.8). Notable exceptions were the detection of rarer anti-synthetases with κ Conclusion The assays analysed do not perform well for all myositis-specific and -associated autoantibodies and overall false positives are relatively common. It is crucial that clinicians are aware of the limitations of the methods used by their local laboratory. Results must be interpreted within the clinical context and immunoprecipitation should still be considered in selected cases, such as apparently autoantibody-negative patients where anti-synthetase syndrome is suspected.

ObjectiveEvaluation of a psoriatic arthritis (PsA), multidimensional, patient-completed disease flare questionnaire (FLARE).MethodsThe FLARE questionnaire was administered to 139 patients in a prospective observational study. The “gold standard” of flare was based on patient opinion. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Disease activity was measured by the Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS), Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and PsA (GRAPPA) Composite Exercise (GRACE), Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (CPDAI), and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA).ResultsThe most common symptoms of a PsA flare were musculoskeletal, followed by fatigue, frustration, loss of function, and an increase in cutaneous symptoms. The test-retest ICC for the FLARE questionnaire was 0.87 (95% CI 0.72–0.94). The optimum cut-off to identify a flare of disease was 4/10 (sensitivity 0.82, specificity 0.76; area under the curve 0.85). For those patients scoring ≥ 4, the mean score for the composite measures was as follows (score for those not reporting a flare in parentheses): PASDAS 5.3 ± 1.3 (3.1 ± 1.6); GRACE 4.5 ± 1.2 (2.2 ± 1.4); CPDAI 8.9 ± 2.5 (4.7 ± 3.1); and DAPSA 38.2 ± 20.3 (16.8 ± 14.9). In a new flare, the increase in composite measure score was calculated as follows: 1 for PASDAS and GRACE, 2 for CPDAI, and 7 for DAPSA. Agreement between the definition of flare using the cut-off of 4 from the questionnaire, and that indicated by the subject in a separate, standalone question was 0.57 (Cohen κ).ConclusionA PsA flare displays escalation of symptoms and signs across multiple domains. The FLARE questionnaire has external validity in terms of both composite disease activity and overall patient opinion about the state of their condition.

Background: Psoriatic nail dystrophy is infrequently assessed in routine care and observational cohorts due to the lack of a feasible validated outcome measure. Objective: To assess the measurement properties of the “Severity of NAil Psoriasis Score” (SNAPS) in PsA. Methods: Nail photography was performed on prospectively recruited patients at baseline and 6 months. The modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) and Physician Nail Visual Acuity Scale (PhNVAS) were comparator instruments for construct validity. Reliability and feasibility were assessed using intra-class correlations (ICCs) and timed scoring. Responsiveness was assessed by correlating the changes in SNAPS, mNAPSI and PhNVAS. Retrospective data from the Bath PsA database was further utilized to assess responsiveness. Results: 21 patients participated in the prospective validation at baseline. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of SNAPS were 0.94 and 0.93-0.96 (p ≤ 0.005). Mean times required to score SNAPS and mNAPSI were 59 and 136 seconds. There were strong correlations between SNAPS and mNAPSI (r = 0.95, p < 0.001) and PhNVAS (r = 0.77, p < 0.001) at baseline. There was a significant reduction in the mNAPSI and SNAPS (p < 0.005) at 6 months and a strong correlation between the change in SNAPS and mNAPSI (rho = 0.838, p < 0.001). Historical data from 57 patients commenced on Etanercept were evaluated. Mean SNAPS reduced from 3.6 to 2.0 at 3 months and 1.2 at 6 months (p < 0.05). Change in SNAPS correlated with changes in Psoriasis Area Severity Index and Dermatology Quality of Life at 3 and 6 months (r≥0.510; p ≤ 0.003). Conclusion: SNAPS is a feasible, reliable and responsive outcome instrument for psoriatic nail dystrophy.

Objective The current classification criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) retain PM as a major disease subgroup. However, evolution in the understanding of IIM has suggested that many of these patients could be better described as having an alternative diagnosis. In the present study, we apply the latest understanding of IIM subtyping to retrospectively review PM diagnoses in a large cohort of IIM patients. Methods Within a previously reported cohort of 255 patients from a UK tertiary myositis clinic, 37 patients classified as PM according to both the EULAR/ACR IIM criteria and expert opinion were identified. Clinical data and complementary tests were reviewed, and consensus decisions regarding final classification were reached in each case. Results Nine (9/37, 24.3%) patients remained classified as PM, 3.5% (9/255) of the original cohort; these PM patients were seronegative for myositis antibodies, responsive to immunosuppression, and in 4/7 (57.1%) patients where muscle biopsy was performed had HLA-1 upregulation and endomysial inflammatory infiltrates. Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (5/37, 13.5%) and connective tissue disease overlap myositis (7/37, 19%) were the main alternative diagnoses. The remaining patients were diagnosed as: unspecified myopathy (6/37, 16%), dermatomyositis (2/37, 5%), cancer-associated myopathy (3/37, 8.1%), and non-inflammatory myopathy (1/37, 3%, myofibrillar myopathy). Four patients (4/37, 10%) had insufficient data available to confidently reclassify. Conclusion Our study confirms that PM can now be considered a rare IIM subgroup. A thorough examination, complete myositis autoantibody panel, and careful interpretation of the biopsy results is recommended to confirm the correct IIM sub-type.

Objective To test the addition of pain and fatigue to the Composite Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity (CPDAI) and the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and PsA (GRAPPA) Composite Exercise (GRACE) composite measures of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods Clinical and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed in patients with PsA at 3 consecutive follow-up visits over 6 months in a UK multicenter observational study. A pain visual analog scale and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue scale were added as modifications to the CPDAI and GRACE composite measures. Original and modified versions were tested against the PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) and the Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA). Discrimination between disease states and responsiveness were tested with t-scores, standardized response means (SRMs), and effect sizes. Data were presented to members at the 2020 annual meeting who then voted on the GRAPPArecommended composite and treatment targets for clinical trials. Results One hundred forty-one patients were recruited with a mean PsA disease duration of 6.1 years (range 0–41 yrs). The SRMs for the GRACE and modified GRACE (mGRACE) were 0.67 and 0.64, respectively, and 0.54 and 0.46, respectively, for the CPDAI and modified CPDAI (mCPDAI). The t-scores for the GRACE and mGRACE were unchanged at 7.8 for both, and 6.8 and 7.0 for the CPDAI and mCPDAI, respectively. The PASDAS demonstrated the best responsiveness (SRM 0.84) and discrimination (t-scores 8.3). Most members (82%) agreed the composites should not be modified and 77% voted for the PASDAS as the GRAPPA-recommended composite for clinical trials, with 90% minimal disease activity (MDA) as the target. Conclusion Modifying the CPDAI and GRACE with the addition of pain and fatigue does not enhance responsiveness nor the measures’ ability to detect disease status in terms of requiring treatment escalation. GRAPPA members voted for the PASDAS as the composite measure in clinical trials and MDA as the target.

Objectives To describe the prevalence and clinical associations of autoantibodies to a novel autoantigen, eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3), detected in idiopathic inflammatory myositis. Methods Sera or plasma from 678 PM patients were analysed for autoantigen specificity by radio-labelled protein immunoprecipitation (IPP). Samples immunoprecipitating the same novel autoantigens were further analysed by indirect immunofluorescence and IPP using pre-depleted cell extracts. The autoantigen was identified through a combination of IPP and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, and confirmed using commercial antibodies and IPP-western blots. Additional samples from patients with DM (668), DM-overlap (80), PM-overlap (191), systemic sclerosis (150), systemic lupus erythematosus (200), Sjogren’s syndrome (40), rheumatoid arthritis (50) and healthy controls (150) were serotyped by IPP as disease or healthy controls. Results IPP revealed a novel pattern in three PM patients (0.44%) that was not found in disease-specific or healthy control sera. Indirect immunofluorescence demonstrated a fine cytoplasmic speckled pattern for all positive patients. Mass spectrometry analysis of the protein complex identified the target autoantigen as eIF3, a cytoplasmic complex with a role in the initiation of translation. Findings were confirmed by IPP-Western blotting. The three anti-eIF3-positive patients had no history of malignancy or interstitial lung disease, and had a favourable response to treatment. Conclusion We report a novel autoantibody in 0.44% of PM patients directed against a cytoplasmic complex of proteins identified as eIF3. Although our findings need further confirmation, anti-eIF3 appears to correlate with a good prognosis and a favourable response to treatment.

Social Impact Bonds (SIBs) are a novel financing mechanism for public services delivery. This special issue about SIBs in the UK argues that they necessitate closer examination to understand the implications for all stakeholders. This introductory paper critically explores and challenges dominant practitioner narratives of SIBs as “win-win” solutions for governments and service providers. While SIBs may foster innovation it is unclear if they deliver better value given the complexity of public services. SIBs are a strategically ambiguous policy tool and policymakers should be cautious about SIBs due to contractual complexity and issues with ethics, governance, accountability and transparency.

Background Health inequalities in the UK have proved to be stubborn, and health gaps between best and worst-off are widening. While there is growing understanding of how the main causes of poor health are perceived among different stakeholders, similar insight is lacking regarding what solutions should be prioritised. Furthermore, we do not know the relationship between perceived causes and solutions to health inequalities, whether there is agreement between professional stakeholders and people living in low-income communities or agreement within these groups. Methods Q methodology was used to identify and describe the shared perspectives (‘subjectivities’) that exist on i) why health is worse in low-income communities (‘Causes’) and ii) the ways that health could be improved in these same communities (‘Solutions’). Purposively selected individuals (n = 53) from low-income communities (n = 25) and professional stakeholder groups (n = 28) ranked ordered sets of statements – 34 ‘Causes’ and 39 ‘Solutions’ – onto quasi-normal shaped grids according to their point of view. Factor analysis was used to identify shared points of view. ‘Causes’ and ‘Solutions’ were analysed independently, before examining correlations between perspectives on causes and perspectives on solutions. Results Analysis produced three factor solutions for both the ‘Causes’ and ‘Solutions’. Broadly summarised these accounts for ‘Causes’ are: i) ‘Unfair Society’, ii) ‘Dependent, workless and lazy’, iii) ‘Intergenerational hardships’ and for ‘Solutions’: i) ‘Empower communities’, ii) ‘Paternalism’, iii) ‘Redistribution’. No professionals defined (i.e. had a significant association with one factor only) the ‘Causes’ factor ‘Dependent, workless and lazy’ and the ‘Solutions’ factor ‘Paternalism’. No community participants defined the ‘Solutions’ factor ‘Redistribution’. The direction of correlations between the two sets of factor solutions – ‘Causes’ and ‘Solutions’ – appear to be intuitive, given the accounts identified. Conclusions Despite the plurality of views there was broad agreement across accounts about issues relating to money. This is important as it points a way forward for tackling health inequalities, highlighting areas for policy and future research to focus on. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-3884-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background/Aims SLE is heterogeneous in clinical presentation, underlying immunology, and response to therapy. Patients with severe or resistant disease receive cyclophosphamide or rituximab. Although effective, late use of these therapies entails cumulative damage. Emerging predictors of response to rituximab include demographics, IFN-Scores and autoantibodies. For such predictors to change treatment strategy we need to understand their association with the effectiveness of other therapeutic options at earlier decision points. Prospective studies of treatment pathways are difficult to perform, requiring large populations followed for many years. We therefore investigated this question by analysing retrospective treatment pathways since diagnosis in patients whose biomarker status is subsequently known. Methods In patients with established SLE, attending Leeds SLE clinic, we collected demographics, clinical characteristics and blood at a single timepoint. Two previously validated IFN-Scores (IFN-Score A and IFN-Score B) were measured using Taqman. Autoantibodies were measured using immunoprecipitation. Treatment history covering all antimalarials, oral and intravenous immunosuppressants (agent, start and stop dates and reasons) since diagnosis was collected. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to test variables as predictors of the primary endpoint: time to cyclophosphamide/rituximab. Results 124 patients were included. Follow up since diagnosis was Median (IQR) 37.5 (27.4-52.3) years, total therapies per patient was 3 (1-4), therapies per year was 0.2 (0.1-0.3). 54/124 (44%) patients required cyclophosphamide/rituximab. Results of Cox regression are shown in the table. There was a significant association between high expression of IFN-Score B and requirement for cyclophosphamide/rituximab as well as trends for age in the first quartile ( Conclusion Patients developing SLE before age 28 with raised interferon scores may be forecast to develop severe disease, fail oral therapies, and require rituximab. While this retrospective analysis may be confounded by a survivorship bias, our findings are consistent with other literature on these variables as predictors of severe disease. Future work will analyse more biomarkers in a larger and more varied patient population. P163 Table 1:CharacteristicCYC/RTX=Yes n(%)CYC/RTX =No n(%)Univariable Hazard ratio (95% CI)Univariable p valueMultivariable Hazard Ratio (95% CI)Multivariable p valueAgeQ1: under 2822 (71%)9 (29%)2.25 (0.99,5.12)0.0541.74 (0.95,3.18)0.074Q2: 28-3812 (39%)19 (61%)1.03 (0.41,2.56)0.949Not includedNot includedQ3: 38-5212 (39%)19 (61%)1.52 (0.62,3.72)0.360Not includedNot includedQ4: over 528 (26%)23 (74%)referencereferenceNot includedNot includedEthnicityCaucasian42 (48%)46 (52%)1.17 (0.58,2.35)0.660Not includedNot includedAfroCaribbean, South Asian, East Asian, Other10 (36%)18 (64%)referencereferenceNot includedNot includedIFN Score A, mean (SD)–2.59 (–2.67)–3.84 (–2.71)1.10 (0.98,1.24)0.113Not includedNot includedIFN Score B, mean (SD)–2.61 (–1.16)–3.53 (–1.76)1.31 (1.05,1.64)0.0171.23 (0.98,1.55)0.079Anti-Sm/U1RNP Ab positive17 (61%)11 (39%)1.50 (0.84,2.67)0.171Not includedNot includedAnti-Ro(60) Ab positive14 (45%)17 (55%)0.88 (0.47,1.65)0.686Not includedNot included Disclosure S. Hassan: Grants/research support; S.U.H. is funded as NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre Research Fellow. K. Mahmoud: None. L. Carter: None. K. Dutton: None. D. Li: None. I.N. Bruce: None. N. McHugh: None. T. Consortium: None. Z. Wigston: None. P. Emery: Consultancies; P.E. has received consultant fees from BMS, Abbott, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Roche and UCB. Grants/research support; P.E. has received research grants paid to his employer from Abbott, BMS, Pfizer, MSD and Roche. A. Psarras: None. M. Md Yusof: Grants/research support; M.Y.M.Y. is funded as a Wellcome fellow. E. Vital: Honoraria; E.M.V. has homoraria from Roche, GSK and AstraZenica. Grants/research support; E.M.V. has research grant support from Roche, GSK and AstraZenica.

Background Rural health outcomes are often worse than their urban counterparts. While rural health theory recognizes the importance of the social determinants of health, there is a lack of insight into public perspectives for improving rural health beyond the provision of health‐care services. Gaining insight into perceived solutions, that include and go beyond health‐ care, can help to inform resource allocation decisions to improve rural health. Objective To identify and describe shared perspectives within a remote‐rural community on how to improve rural health. Method Using Q methodology, a set of 40 statements were developed representing different perceptions of how to improve rural health. Residents of one remote‐rural island community ranked this statement set according to their level of agreement. Card‐sorts were analysed using factor analysis to identify shared points of view and interpreted alongside post‐sort qualitative interviews. Results Sixty‐two respondents participated in the study. Four shared perspectives were identified, labelled: Local economic activity; Protect and care for the community; Redistribution of resources; and Investing in people. Factors converged on the need to relieve poverty and ensure access to amenities and services. Discussion and conclusions Factors represent different elements of a multifaceted theory of rural health, indicating that ‘lay’ respondents are capable of comprehending various approaches to health improvement and perspectives are not homogenous within rural communities. Respondents diverged on the role of individuals, the public sector and ‘empowered’ community‐based organizations in delivering these solutions, with implications for policy and practice. Public Contribution Members of the public were involved in the development and piloting of the statement set.

Context ‘What does ‘The Public’ think?’ is a question often posed by researchers and policy makers, and public values are regularly invoked to justify policy decisions. Over time there has been a participatory turn in the social and health sciences, including health technology assessment and priority setting in health, towards citizen participation such that public policies reflect public values. It is one thing to agree that public values are important, however, and another to agree on how public values should be elicited, deliberated upon and integrated into decision-making. Surveys of public values rarely deliver unanimity, and preference heterogeneity, or plurality, is to be expected. Methods This paper examines the role of public values in health policy and how to elicit, analyse, and present values, in the face of plurality. We delineate the strengths and weaknesses of aggregative and deliberative methods before setting out a new empirical framework, drawing on Sunstein's Incompletely Theorised Agreements, based on three levels: principles, policies and patients. The framework is illustrated using a recognised policy dilemma – the provision of high cost, limited-effect medicines intended to extend life for people with terminal illnesses. Findings Application of the multi-level framework to public values permits transparent consideration of plurality, including analysis of coherence and consensus, in a way that offers routes to policy recommendations that are based on public values and justified in those terms. Conclusions Using the new framework and eliciting quantitative and qualitative data across levels of abstraction has the potential to inform policy recommendations grounded in public values, where values are plural. This is not to suggest that one solution will magically emerge, but rather that choices between policies can be explicitly justified in relation to the properties of public values, and a much clearer understanding of (in)consistencies and areas of consensus., Highlights • Public values are important for priority setting in health. • Public values are plural but we do not know how to account for plurality in policy. • Counting, coherence and consensus are relevant to resolving value plurality. • This paper presents a new empirical framework for analysis of public values. • The framework has potential to account for value plurality in health policy making.

The widening health gap between the best and worst-off in the UK requires innovative solutions that act upon the social, economic and environmental causes of ill-health. Initiatives such as microcredit have been conceptualised as having the potential to act on the social determinants of health. However, pathways that lead to this impact have yet to be empirically explored. People living on low incomes, who are financially-excluded, require access to credit to cope with everyday financial needs. While research shows the connections between debt and health, this link is often focused on over-indebtedness and negative health outcomes. In this paper, we investigate the impact of responsibly-delivered credit on the health and wellbeing of borrowers. In 2016-17, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with fourteen borrowers from two microcredit providers offering personal and business microloans, operating in Glasgow, United Kingdom. Findings are presented, using social determinants of health as an analytic lens, and illustrated in a conceptual model explaining the loan mechanisms and pathways connecting microcredit to health and wellbeing. Microcredit, and the mechanisms through which it is delivered, were perceived by participants as positively impacting on their health and wellbeing. Access to flexible, responsibly-delivered, microloans enabled participants to plan and feel secure when faced with (un)expected financial events, reducing the associated stress, sustaining social relationships and empowering borrowers to take greater control over their lives. For some, receiving microcredit was stressful, as it is still a debt that needs to be repaid. Such stress can also be exacerbated by particular aspects of the lending model; for example, group lending. Our results contribute to growing evidence on the impact of financial inclusion approaches on health and wellbeing, highlighting the potential role of microcredit as a public health initiative and the need to support ‘alternative’ economic spaces in the UK to serve the financially-excluded.

Objectives To identify clinical factors associated with cancer risk in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) and to systematically review the existing evidence related to cancer screening. Methods A systematic literature search was carried out on Medline, Embase and Scopus. Cancer risk within the IIM population (i.e. not compared with the general population) was expressed as risk ratios (RR) for binary variables and weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous variables. Evidence relating to cancer screening practices in the IIMs were synthesized via narrative review. Results Sixty-nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. DM subtype (RR 2.21), older age (WMD 11.19), male sex (RR 1.53), dysphagia (RR 2.09), cutaneous ulceration (RR 2.73) and anti-transcriptional intermediary factor-1 gamma positivity (RR 4.66) were identified as being associated with significantly increased risk of cancer. PM (RR 0.49) and clinically amyopathic DM (RR 0.44) subtypes, Raynaud’s phenomenon (RR 0.61), interstitial lung disease (RR 0.49), very high serum creatine kinase (WMD −1189.96) or lactate dehydrogenase (WMD −336.52) levels, and anti-Jo1 (RR 0.45) or anti-EJ (RR 0.17) positivity were identified as being associated with significantly reduced risk of cancer. Nine studies relating to IIM-specific cancer screening were included. CT scanning of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis appeared to be effective in identifying underlying asymptomatic cancers. Conclusion Cancer risk factors should be evaluated in patients with IIM for risk stratification. Screening evidence is limited but CT scanning could be useful. Prospective studies and consensus guidelines are needed to establish cancer screening strategies in IIM patients.

Background Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin affecting 2–3% of UK population. 30% of people affected by psoriasis will develop a distinct form of arthritis within 10 years of the skin condition onset. Although the pathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis is still unknown, there is a genetic predisposition triggered by environmental factors. Limited but convincing evidence link the gut microbiome to psoriatic arthritis. The Microbiome in Psoriatic ARThritis (Mi-PART) study propose is to characterise the microbiome-metabolic interface in patients affected by psoriatic arthritis to deepen our understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease. Methods This is a multicentre, prospective, observational study. Psoriatic arthritis (n = 65) and ankylosing spondylitis (n = 30) patients will be recruited in addition to a control group of healthy volunteers (n = 30). Patients eligibility will be evaluated against the Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Activity Index (BASDAI) and the healthy volunteers who fulfil study inclusion and exclusion criteria. Information regarding their medical and medication history, demographics, diet and lifestyle will be collected. All the participants in the study will be asked to complete a 7-day food diary, to provide stool samples and to complete quality of life questionnaires. Routine clinical laboratory tests will be performed on blood and urine samples. Patients and healthy volunteers with gastrointestinal symptoms, previous history of cancer, gastrointestinal surgery in the previous 6 months or alcohol abuse will be excluded from the study. Discussion The aim of this trial is to characterise the microbiome of psoriatic arthritis patients and to compare it with microbiome of healthy volunteers and of patient with ankylosing spondylitis in order to define if different rheumatologic conditions are associated with characteristic microbiome profiles. Investigating the role of the microbiome in the development of psoriatic arthritis could deepen our understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease and potentially open the way to new therapies.

The aim of this guideline is to provide an update on evidence-based recommendations for treatment of adult patients with PsA. The previous BSR guidelines for PsA were published in 2012 and since that time, there have been many new advanced therapies licensed for PsA. This update will provide practical guidance for clinicians on the optimal selection of advanced therapies taking into account different domains of PsA (arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, axial disease and psoriasis) and key associated comorbidities. It will also update guidance on treatment strategy including the use of a treat-to-target approach. The guideline will be developed using the methods and processes outlined in Creating Clinical Guidelines: Our Protocol. (1) This development process to produce guidance, advice and recommendations for practice has National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) accreditation.

Objectives It has been over 10 years since the first report of autoantibodies directed against phenylalanyl tRNA synthetase (anti-Zo) in a patient with features of the anti-synthetase syndrome. In that time no further cases have been published. Here we aim to characterize more fully the clinical phenotype of anti-Zo–associated myositis by describing the clinical features of nine patients. Methods Anti-Zo was identified by protein-immunoprecipitation in patients referred for extended spectrum myositis autoantibody testing at our laboratory. Results were confirmed by immunodepletion using a reference serum. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to provide detailed information of the associated clinical phenotype for all identified patients. Where possible, HLA genotype was imputed using Illumina protocols. Results Nine patients with anti-Zo were identified. The median age at disease onset was 51 years, and six patients were female. Seven patients had evidence of inflammatory muscle disease, seven of interstitial lung disease and six of arthritis. The reported pattern of interstitial lung disease varied with usual interstitial pneumonia, non-specific interstitial pneumonia and organizing pneumonia all described. Other features of the anti-synthetase syndrome such as RP and mechanics hands were common. HLA data was available for three patients, all of whom had at least one copy of the HLA 8.1 ancestral haplotype. Conclusion Patients with anti-Zo presenting with features of the anti-synthetase syndrome and interstitial lung disease is a common finding. Like other myositis autoantibodies, there is likely to be a genetic association with the HLA 8.1 ancestral haplotype.

Background Psoriatic nail disease is one of the six disease manifestations of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in addition to peripheral arthritis, psoriasis, enthesitis, dactylitis and axial disease. Nail pitting is associated with an increased risk of developing PsA and onycholysis is associated with radiographic damage at the distal interphalangeal joints. Quantitative assessment of psoriatic nail disease is rarely performed in clinical practice therefore little is known about the burden of nail disease and effect of treatment in observational cohorts. We set out to quantify the burden of nail disease and response to b/tsDMARD treatment in a secondary care cohort. Methods Data were taken from the Bath PsA cohort. Patients fulfil CASPAR criteria and have clinical and patient reported outcomes at routine clinic follow-up visits. Patients commencing a b/tsDMARD with at least one follow up visit were included for analysis. Nail involvement was assessed using the Bath Nail score; pitting (0-10), onycholysis (0-10), hyperkeratosis (0-10) and severe deformity (0-10). Results 157 of 485 (32%) of the cohort commencing b/tsDMARDS had nail disease at baseline and were included in the analysis. At baseline nail pitting (65%) and onycholysis (57%) were the most frequent nail manifestations followed by hyperkeratosis (14%) and severe nail deformity (7%) (Table 1). At the first follow-up visit (mean duration 20 weeks), 39% of patients achieved clear nails. At the final follow-up visit (mean duration 59 weeks) 56% had clear nails and 44% of patients had residual nail disease with a median (IQR) nail score of 0 (0.0-2.0). Earliest improvements were seen in nail bed manifestations (onycholysis/ hyperkeratosis) whilst improvement in nail matrix features (pitting) occurred later (Table 1) (p < 0.001). Conclusion Psoriatic nail disease affects one third of those commencing b/tsDMARDs in this cohort. Earliest treatment responses are seen in features of psoriatic nail dystrophy that affect the nail distally. At 20 weeks 39% of those with nail disease at baseline achieve clear nails. At one year, 44% of patients have ongoing nail manifestations, but few patients have persistently high nail scores. Disclosures P. Nair None. A. Anthony None. C. Lovell None. E. Korendowych None. C. Cavill None. N. McHugh None. W. Tillett None.

Background Understanding the impact of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) on an individual and how the disease evolves over time is important when determining a therapeutic strategy. However, little is known about the natural course of arthritis, psoriasis, and enthesitis, their relative impact on quality of life and how disease burden in real world cohorts compares to clinical trial populations. We set out to describe the burden of disease and impact on quality of life in an observational UK secondary care cohort. Methods Cross sectional cohorts were selected from the Bath PsA cohort, group one with early disease (within 24 months of diagnosis), groups two and three with established disease (commencing therapy with first or second line biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug- bDMARD therapy respectively; assessments both at initiation and 3 months after initiation). Results Analyses were undertaken where sufficient data was available on 154 patients eligible for entry into the early PsA cohort (group 1), 240 patients eligible for the biologic initiator cohort (group 2) and 103 for the second line biologics initiator cohort. Cohort characteristics are reported in Table 1. The burden of joint disease was high in all cohorts and approximately comparable to clinical trial populations in group 2 commencing bDMARD (mean tender joints count 22 (SD 14), swollen 7 (SD 5) cDAPSA mean 36 (SD 15)). Mean Body Mass Index (BMI) rose from overweight in early disease to obese in established disease (table 1). There was little enthesitis in any group (LEI mean Conclusion We report high levels of residual joint disease, fatigue, obesity and work disability in both early and established PsA cohorts. Despite low absolute levels of residual skin and nail disease both become more strongly associated with worse quality of life in more established disease. Disclosures W. Tillett: Honoraria; Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Grants/research support; Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Celgene. A. Rambojun: Grants/research support; EPSRC. A. Bradley: Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company Limited. Other; Employee of Eli Lilly and Company Limited. J. Mount: Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company Limited. Other; Employee of Eli Lilly and Company Limited. C. Cavill: Grants/research support; Eli Lilly and Company Limited. E. Korendowych: Honoraria; Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis. Grants/research support; Eli Lilly and Company Limited. N. McHugh: Consultancies; Abbvie. Grants/research support; Eli Lilly and Company Limited.

Background: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a progressive and often destructive joint disease affecting approximately 20% of people with psoriasis. Objectives: To investigate associations between obesity, changes in body mass index (BMI), alcohol intake and smoking status and the development of PsA in people with psoriasis. Methods: We undertook a cohort study involving incident cases of psoriasis identified from the U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1998 and 2014. The associations between smoking, alcohol and BMI and development of PsA were assessed using generalized additive models. Additionally, the risks associated with a change in BMI during follow-up were investigated using distributed lag nonlinear models. Results: We identified 90 189 incident cases of psoriasis (42% male, mean age 51 years), of whom 1409 had a subsequent record of PsA diagnosis. BMIs of 25·0–29·9, 30·0–34·9 and ≥ 35·0 kg m −2 were significantly associated with an increased risk of developing PsA compared with BMIs < 25·0 kg m −2: adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) 1·79 (1·46–2·19), 2·10 (1·67–2·63) and 2·68 (2·09–3·43), respectively. Reducing BMI over a 10-year period (linearly) was associated with a reduction in the risk of developing PsA compared with BMI remaining constant over the same period. Increased risks of developing PsA were associated with moderate drinking but not with former or heavy drinking or with current or past smoking status. Conclusions: In this incident psoriasis cohort, increased BMI and moderate drinking, but not heavy drinking or smoking status, were associated with an increased risk of PsA in people with psoriasis. Importantly, we have shown that reducing weight may result in a reduction in the risk of developing PsA. What's already known about this topic?. There is some evidence that increased body mass index is associated with an increased risk of developing psoriatic arthritis. There are conflicting results surrounding the relationship between smoking and the development of psoriatic arthritis among patients with psoriasis. What does this study add?. Using a nonlinear and lagged effect of body mass index measured over time we have shown that reducing body mass index may be associated with a reduction in the risk of developing psoriatic arthritis. We have found no evidence that smoking alters the risk of developing psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis.

Objective:To evaluate and update the evidence for the measurement properties of the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID12) questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).Methods:The PsAID12 psychometric evidence was gathered in a systematic literature review in PsA (registration number: CRD42016032546). The study quality was appraised using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments–Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (COSMIN-OMERACT) good methods check-list. Content validity, test–retest reliability, construct validity, longitudinal construct validity, discrimination, and thresholds of meaning were appraised. Additional analyses for construct validity, responsiveness, and sensitivity to change were conducted in available observational data sets after prespecified hypotheses were formulated.Results:Eight publications (129-474 patients) were analyzed. The PsAID12 fulfilled OMERACT criteria for content validity (patients and physicians endorsed content match with PsA HRQoL domain), feasibility (endorsed by patients and physicians), and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.91-0.95). A priori construct validity hypotheses were mostly met: Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease had high correlation with generic ( r = 0.76-0.87) and PsA-specific HRQol measures (0.8), and with measures of physical function (0.66-0.72), work productivity (0.69-0.75), pain (0.83), and fatigue (0.84). Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease had moderate-high correlation with measures of patient global (0.49-0.84) and dermatologic HRQoL (0.36-0.53). Correlations were higher with generic HRQoL measured by short form-36 physical component score (0.47-0.73) versus short form-36 mental component score (0.22-0.60). Three studies confirmed known group validity of PsAID12 according to PsA disease activity. Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease discriminated between change groups in 2 longitudinal studies (standardized response mean: 0.74-0.91, 53 and 105 patients). The minimal clinically important improvement was 3 and 1.4 points.Conclusion:Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease had evidence for good content and construct validity, reliability, and longitudinal construct validity and is ready to evaluate in clinical trials.

Myositis autoantibodies can help subset patients into more homologous groups, aiding in diagnosis and helping to predict potential disease complications. In recent years, a number of novel myositis autoantibodies including anti-HMGCR, anti-SAE, anti-CN1A and anti-PUF60 have been identified and characterised, with the majority of myositis patients now having a detectable autoantibody. Preliminary studies have also led to the discovery of a number of emerging myositis autoantibodies including anti-SMN, anti-cortactin, anti-NPC and anti-FHL1, which when fully characterised may provide additional insight into disease pathogenesis as well as providing additional subsets in the serological classification of myositis. This chapter describes the prevalence and clinical associations of these new and emerging biomarkers.

The discovery of an increased repertoire of autoantibodies associated with idiopathic inflammatory myositis has important implications for enabling earlier diagnosis. Either a myositis-specific or a myositis-associated autoantibody is present in about 70% of adult and juvenile cases and in many cases identify specific patterns of disease and co-morbidities. In the future, it is likely that knowledge of a myositis autoantibody profile will be more fully incorporated into diagnostic and classification criteria and lessen the need for more invasive investigative procedures. In the meantime, there is a need for standardisation of commercial assays that are becoming more available, awareness of the reliability of initial autoantibody screening procedures, and guidance on how to interpret myositis autoantibody results in a given clinical context.

OBJECTIVES: Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is the commonest manifestation of systemic sclerosis (SSc). RP is an episodic phenomenon, not easily assessed in the clinic, leading to reliance on self-report. A thorough understanding of the patient experience of SSc-RP is essential to ensuring patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments capture domains important to the target patient population. We report the findings of an international qualitative research study investigating the patient experience of SSc-RP.METHODS: Focus groups (FGs) of SSc patients were conducted across 3 scleroderma centers in the US and UK, using a topic guide and a priori purposive sampling framework devised by qualitative researchers, SSc patients and SSc experts. FGs were audio recorded, transcribed, anonymised and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. FGs were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved.RESULTS: Forty SSc patients participated in 6 focus groups conducted in Bath (UK), New Orleans (US) and Pittsburgh (US). Seven major themes were identified that encapsulate the patient experience of SSc-RP: physical symptoms, emotional impact, triggers & exacerbating factors, constant vigilance & self-management, impact on daily life, uncertainty and adaptation. The inter-relationship of the 7 constituent themes can be arranged within a conceptual map of SSc-RP.CONCLUSION: We have explored the patient experience of SSc-RP in a diverse and representative SSc cohort and identified a complex interplay of experiences that result in significant impact. Work to develop a novel PRO instrument for assessing the severity and impact of SSc-RP, comprising domains/items grounded in the patient experiences of SSc-RP identified in this study is underway. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Background The close temporal association between onset of some connective tissue diseases and cancer suggests a paraneoplastic association. Adult patients with scleroderma with anti-RNA polymerase III autoantibodies and adult patients with dermatomyositis with anti-transcriptional intermediary factor 1 (anti-TIF1) or anti-nuclear matrix protein 2 (anti-NXP2) autoantibodies have a significantly increased risk of developing cancer. Autoantibodies may serve as biomarkers for early detection of cancer and also could be relevant for prediction of responses to immune therapies. We aimed to test whether myositis and scleroderma specific or associated autoantibodies are detectable in individuals with lung cancer. Methods Serum from 60 Caucasian patients with lung cancer (30 with small cell lung cancer, 30 with non-small cell lung cancer) was screened for myositis and scleroderma specific and associated autoantibodies by radiolabelled immunoprecipitation. Results Anti-TIF1, anti-NXP2 or anti-RNA polymerase III autoantibodies were not detected in any of the 60 patients with lung cancer. Anti-glycyl-transfer RNA (tRNA) synthetase (anti-EJ) autoantibodies were detected in one patient with non-small cell lung cancer. No other known myositis or scleroderma autoantibodies were identified. Conclusions Myositis and scleroderma specific autoantibodies, including anti-TIF1, anti-NXP2 and anti-RNA polymerase III, are rare in patients with lung cancer without an autoimmune disease. We report here the first case of anti-EJ autoantibodies being detected in a patient with lung cancer without clinical or radiographic evidence of the anti-synthetase syndrome. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-018-1678-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

In this small case series, all eight patients were women in their fifth and sixth decades. This is similar to the female predominance in morphoea and less in keeping with eosinophilic fasciitis (EF). All cases had diffuse induration of their limbs with both proximal and distal patterns of distribution, and five of the patients exhibited peau d'orange skin. All patients had diffuse induration of the lower limbs and half had restricted ankle movements. Six patients had concomitant superficial morphoea. This group of patients demonstrated a unique subtype of the morphoea spectrum with some features overlapping with EF. However, there appear to be points of distinction, and we propose that some previously reported cases labelled as EF would be better described as having morphoea profunda (MP). Methotrexate may be a useful treatment for MP, hence it is important to distinguish this from EF, as management may differ.

Objectives: Autoantibodies targeting ubiquitously expressed nuclear antigens can be identified in most patients with SSc. Cytoplasmic autoantibodies (in otherwise ANA-negative sera) targeting eukaryotic initiation factor-2B (anti-eIF2B) have recently been identified in SSc with clinical associations to dcSSc disease and interstitial lung disease (ILD), although the majority of samples originated from a tertiary SSc-ILD centre. We investigated the prevalence and clinical associations of recently described SSc-specific (including anti-eIF2B) and other cytoplasmic autoantibodies in ANA-negative sera obtained from a large representative SSc cohort.Methods: ANA-negative sera from the Scleroderma Family Registry and DNA Repository underwent indirect immunofluorescence, radiolabelled protein immunoprecipitation (± immunodepletion) to identify anti-eIF2B and other CTD-related autoantibodies. The clinical phenotype of positive samples was evaluated.Results: Immunoprecipitation was performed on 128 ANA-negative samples (obtained from 3249 SSc patients). Anti-eIF2B antibodies were present in nine patients (7%), the majority of whom had dcSSc (8/9). SSc-ILD was present in all anti-eIF2B patients for whom chest imaging was available (7/9). Anti-synthetase autoantibodies (targeting PL12, PL7, OJ and Zo) were identified in seven patients (5.5%), all of whom fulfilled the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc and had evidence of SSc-ILD where relevant outcomes were available for evaluation. Anti-RuvBL1/2 antibodies were identified in two patients with SSc-overlap syndromes.Conclusion: Anti-eIF2B antibodies are cytoplasmic SSc-specific autoantibodies with strong clinical associations with dcSSc and SSc-ILD found in ANA-negative sera. Anti-synthetase autoantibodies, and other recently discovered SSc-specific antibodies such as anti-RuvBL1/2, can also be identified in ANA-negative SSc.

BACKGROUND: A recent systematic review identified four candidate serum-soluble bone-turnover biomarkers (dickkopf-1, Dkk-1; macrophage-colony stimulating factor, M-CSF; matrix metalloproteinase-3, MMP-3; osteoprotegerin, OPG) showing possible association with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We aimed to: (i) confirm and determine if these four biomarkers are associated with PsA; (ii) differentiate psoriasis cases with and without arthritis; and (iii) differentiate PsA cases with and without axial arthritis.METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional comparative two-centre study recruited 200 patients with psoriasis without arthritis (PsC), 127 with PsA without axial arthritis (pPsA), 117 with PsA with axial arthritis (psoriatic spondyloarthritis, PsSpA), 157 with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) without psoriasis, and 50 matched healthy controls (HC). Serum biomarker concentrations were measured using ELISA. Multivariable regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed.RESULTS: MMP-3 concentrations were significantly higher and M-CSF significantly lower in each arthritis disease group compared with HC (p ≤ 0.02). MMP-3 concentrations were significantly higher (adjusted odds ratio, ORadj 1.02 per ng/ml increase in concentration; p = 0.0004) and M-CSF significantly lower (ORadj 0.44 per ng/ml increase; p = 0.01) in PsA (pPsA and PsSpA combined) compared with PsC. Dkk-1 concentrations were significantly higher (ORadj 1.22 per ng/mL increase; p = 0.01), and OPG concentrations significantly lower (ORadj 0.20 per ng/mL increase; p = 0.02) in patients with axial arthritis (PsSpA and AS combined) than in those without (pPsA). Furthermore, Dkk-1 concentrations were significantly higher along a spectrum of increasing axial arthritis; Dkk-1 concentrations were higher in AS compared with PsSpA (ORadj 1.18 per ng/mL increase; p = 0.02). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed MMP-3 to be the best single biomarker for differentiating PsA from PsC (AUC 0.70 for a cut-off of 14.51 ng/mL; sensitivity 0.76, specificity 0.60).CONCLUSIONS: MMP-3 and M-CSF are biomarkers for the presence of arthritis in psoriatic disease, and could therefore be used to screen for PsA in psoriasis cohorts. Dkk-1 and OPG are biomarkers of axial arthritis; they could therefore be used to screen for the presence of axial disease in PsA cases, and help differentiate PsSpA from AS. High concentrations of Dkk-1 in AS and PsSpA compared with HC, support previous reports that Dkk-1 is dysfunctional in the spondyloarthritides.

Objective Microparticles (MPs) are membrane-bound vesicles derived from vascular and intravascular cells such as endothelial cells (EMPs) and platelets (PMPs). We investigated EMP and PMP numbers across a spectrum of autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) with the aim of comparing the levels of, and relationship between, EMPs and PMPs. Methods Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) (n = 24), Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) (n = 24), Primary Raynauds Phenomenon (RP) (n = 17) and “other CTD” (n = 15) (Primary Sjogrens Syndrome, UCTD or MCTD) as well as 15 healthy controls were recruited. EMPs and PMPs were quantified using flow cytometry. Associations between MP levels and objective functional vascular assessments were evaluated. Results SLE patients had significantly higher EMPs compared with healthy controls and SSc patients. Higher PMP levels were noted in SSc and primary RP when compared to healthy controls and ‘other CTD’ patients. A modest correlation was noted between EMP and PMP levels in healthy controls (Spearman r = 0.6, p = 0.017). This relationship appeared stronger in SLE (r = 0.72, p, Highlights • Levels of circulating EMPs and PMPs differ between SSc/primary RP compared with other CTDs including SLE. • Circulating MP levels are associated with objective assessments of macro- and microvascular dysfunction. • MPs may have a useful role as novel circulating biomarkers of vascular disease within the CTDs.

Objectives. Anti-tumour necrosis factor antibody (anti-TNF) has revolutionised the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and remission is now a realistic possibility for patients. Despite widespread use of anti-TNFs, predicting which patients are most likely to attain a sustained good response to these treatments remains challenging. Our objective was to undertake a systematic review of the literature to evaluate existing evidence for demographic and clinical factors associated with the achievement of sustained remission in individuals with RA treated with anti-TNF. Methods. EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched along with studies identified from reference lists. Quality of studies was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa criteria. Meta-analysis was undertaken where unadjusted odds ratios were available for the same demographic or clinical factors from at least three studies. Results. Six studies were identified. Concomitant methotrexate use was associated with an increased likelihood of achieving sustained remission. Greater baseline disease activity, tender joint count, age, disease duration, baseline functional impairment and female gender were associated with reduced likelihood of achieving sustained remission. Conclusions. Factors predicting sustained remission are seldom reported. Evidence identified in this review supports current recommendations for methotrexate co-prescription and highlights the negative impact of particular clinical and demographic features on the likelihood of achieving optimal response to anti-TNF treatment. Sustained remission is clinically more relevant than point remission in RA. More widespread reporting of sustained remission will help clinicians set realistic expectations on likely long-term treatment efficacy and could be an important tool for identifying patients suitable for dose optimisation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Innovative interventions that address the social determinants of health are required to help reduce persistent health inequalities. We argue that microcredit can act in this way and develop a conceptual framework from which to examine this. In seeking to evaluate microcredit this way we then examine how randomized controlled trials, currently considered as the ‘gold standard’ in impact evaluations of microcredit, compare with developments in thinking about study design in public health. This leads us to challenge the notion of trials as the apparent gold standard for microcredit evaluations and contend that the pursuit of trial-based evidence alone may be hampering the production of relevant evidence on microcredit’s public health (and other wider) impacts. In doing so, we introduce new insights into the global debate on microfinance impact evaluation, related to ethical issues in staging randomized controlled trials, and propose innovations on complementary methods for use in the evaluation of complex interventions.

Background:Since first described, our understanding of polymyositis (PM) has evolved substantially. Patients previously diagnosed with PM may now be better described as having an alternative diagnosis, including immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), connective tissue disease overlap myositis (CTD-OM), anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS) or inclusion body myositis (IBM).Objectives:To apply the current understanding of IIM subtypes to retrospectively review the diagnosis of patients classified as PM at our centre.Methods:We reviewed a cohort of 255 patients from a UK tertiary myositis clinic, with 37 patients classified as PM according to the EULAR/ACR IIM criteria and expert opinion (1). Consensus decisions made as to whether reclassification as an alternative IIM subtype would be appropriate in each case.Results:Thirty-seven patients with PM diagnosis according to EULAR/ACR IIM criteria and expert opinion were included in the analysis. Twenty-six patients (26/37, 68.4%) were female. The mean age at diagnosis was 57 years (SD 16.25) and mean follow up was 5.2 years (SD 4.8).After consensus discussions, ten patients (27%) retained classification as PM, representing 3.9% (10/255) of the original cohort of 255 patients. The remaining 27 were reclassified as follows: 7 CTD-OM (18.9%), 6 IMNM (16.2%), 6 unspecified myopathy (16.2%), 2 DM (5.4%), 1 IBM (2.7%), and 1 non-inflammatory myopathy (2.7%, myofibrillar myopathy). Four patients (10%) had insufficient data available to allow for a defined diagnosis.Of the 10 patients retaining classification as PM, 7 (70%) were female and mean age at diagnosis was 58.9 years. Clinical characteristics are represented in table 1. Mean CK at diagnosis was 2321 IU/L. Four patients (40%) were ANA positive, 8 patients (80%) were tested for the complete myositis antibody panel and 8 (80%) were specifically tested for the presence of HMGCR antibodies (figure 1). EMG revealed a myopathic pattern in 6/7 patients tested, while MRI demonstrated muscle oedema compatible with myositis in 3/5 of the patients that were tested. A complete muscle biopsy report was available in 8/10 PM-classified patients (80%), diffuse HLA-1 upregulation was present in 5 patients (50%), endomysial inflammatory infiltrates in 5 (50%) and perimysial infiltrates (in conjunction with endomysial infiltrates) in 3 (30%). No other specific features were found.Table 1.Clinical features.PM (n=10)CTD-OM (n=7)IMNM (n=6)All (n=37)Pyrexia0001 (2.7 %)Weight loss2 (20%)2 (28.6%)2 (33.3%)6 (16.2 %)Cutaneous rash01 (14.3%)02 (5.4 %)Mechanic’s hands1 (10%)2 (28.6%)04 (10.8 %)Sclerodactyly01 (14.3%)01 (2.7 %)Periungual erythema01 (14.3%)02 (5.3 %)Raynaud’s05 (71.4%)08 (21.6 %)Arthralgia05 (71.4%)08 (21.6 %)Arthritis02 (28.6%)05 (13.5 %)Muscle weakness10 (100%)7 (100%)6 (100%)36 (97.2%)Myalgia3 (30%)5 (71.4%)3 (50%)20 (54 %)Dysphagia3 (30%)5 (71.4%)1 (16.7%)13 (35.1 %)Interstitial lung disease (ILD)03 (42.9%)04 (10.5 %)Malignancy1 (9.1%)02 (33.3%)3 (8.1%)Conclusion:This study confirms that PM can now be considered a rare IIM subtype. A thorough examination, complete myositis antibody panel including HMGCR testing and careful interpretation of the biopsy results is recommended to accurately classify these patients.References:[1]Parker MJS, Oldroyd A, Roberts ME, Lilleker JB, Betteridge ZE, McHugh NJ, et al. The performance of the European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology idiopathic inflammatory myopathies classification criteria in an expert-defined 10 year incident cohort. Rheumatol (United Kingdom). 2019 Mar 1;58(3):468–75Disclosure of Interests:None declared

ObjectivesTo compare the prevalence, clinical and radiographic characteristics of psoriatic spondyloarthritis (PsSpA) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).MethodsA prospective single-centre cross-sectional observational study recruited consecutive PsA and AS cases. Participants completed outcome measures, and underwent clinical examination, axial radiographic scoring and HLA-sequencing. Multivariable analyses are presented.ResultsThe 402 enrolled cases (201 PsA, 201 AS; fulfilling classification criteria for respective conditions) were reclassified based upon radiographic axial disease and psoriasis, as: 118 PsSpA, 127 peripheral-only PsA (pPsA), and 157 AS without psoriasis (AS) cases. A significant proportion of patients with radiographic axial disease had PsSpA (118/275; 42.91%), and often had symptomatically silent axial disease (30/118; 25.42%). Modified New York criteria for AS were fulfilled by 48/201 (23.88%) PsA cases, and Classification of Psoriatic Arthritis criteria by 49/201 (24.38%) AS cases. pPsA compared with PsSpA cases had a lower frequency of HLA-B*27 (OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.25). Disease activity, metrology and disability were comparable in PsSpA and AS. A significant proportion of PsSpA cases had spondylitis without sacroiliitis (39/118; 33.05%); they less frequently carried HLA-B*27 (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.33). Sacroiliac joint complete ankylosis (adjusted OR, ORadj 2.96; 95% CI 1.42 to 6.15) and bridging syndesmophytes (ORadj 2.78; 95% CI 1.49 to 5.18) were more likely in AS than PsSpA. Radiographic axial disease was more severe in AS than PsSpA (Psoriatic Arthritis Spondylitis Radiology Index Score: adjusted incidence risk ratio 1.13; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.19).ConclusionsIn a combined cohort of patients with either PsA or AS from a single centre, 24% fulfilled classification criteria for both conditions. The pattern of axial disease was influenced significantly by the presence of skin psoriasis and HLA-B*27.

Objective To identify different trajectories of disease activity in patients with RA following initiation of a first anti-TNF. Methods Patients with RA starting their first anti-TNF between 2001 and 2013 were selected from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for RA. Six-monthly DAS28-ESR scores were used to identify trajectories of disease activity using latent class modelling. Data were included for six follow-ups after registration (approximately 3 years). Subgroup analysis examined changes in disease activity profiles over time. Results A total of 14 436 patients with RA starting their first anti-TNF were enrolled between 2001 and 2013 (13 115 between 2001 and 2008, 1321 between 2010 and 2013). The mean number of DAS28-ESR scores was 3.5/patient (s.d. 2.1), with a mean of 184.9 days (s.d. 69.9) between scores. The DAS28-ESR nadir was achieved within 250 days of commencing anti-TNF, although apparent trajectory divergence emerged by first 6-monthly follow-up at 180 days. Four distinct response trajectories comprised the most stable model. Most patients fitted into ‘modest’ (7986 patients; 55.3%) or ‘substantial’ (4676 patients; 32.4%) response trajectories. Of the remainder, 1254 (8.7%) and 520 (3.6%) fitted ‘maximal’ and ‘minimal’ response trajectories, respectively. There was a significant (P < 0.01) increase in proportion achieving ‘maximal’ response between 2001–2008 and 2010–2013. Conclusion This is the largest study to identify long-term response trajectories with anti-TNF. By 6 months, longer-term trajectory profiles of DAS28 could already be identified, with many patients identified earlier. The majority of patients had persistent moderate response, equivalent to maintained DAS28-ESR moderate disease activity. The maximal response trajectory (equivalent to sustained DAS2-ESR remission) was only achieved by approximately one-third of patients.

Objective.To assess whether the association between psoriatic nail dystrophy and radiographic damage in the hands of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is specific to the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints.Methods.A convenience sample of patients was collated from the Bath longitudinal PsA cohort. All patients had PsA according to the ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis criteria (CASPAR) criteria, scored radiographs of their hands, and documented nail scores as measured by the Psoriatic Nail Severity Score. Chi-square tests were performed to examine for association between features of nail dystrophy and radiographic damage in the DIP joints, and proximal interphalangeal or metacarpophalangeal (non-DIP) joints of the corresponding digits.Results.There were 134 patients included, with a median age of 53 years (interquartile range; IQR 44–61) and disease duration of 7 years (IQR 3–17). The presence of any form of psoriatic nail dystrophy was associated with erosion at the DIP joints of the corresponding digit (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.23–2.83; p < 0.004) and this association was primarily driven by the presence of nail onycholysis (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.12–2.62; p = 0.02). Nail subungual hyperkeratosis was more strongly associated with joint space narrowing, erosions, and osteoproliferation at the corresponding DIP joint compared to non-DIP joints (p < 0.001). Nail pitting was not associated with erosions or osteoproliferation.Conclusion.The presence of psoriatic nail dystrophy, particularly onycholysis, is associated with erosive disease at the DIP joints. Subungual hyperkeratosis is more strongly associated with erosive damage at the DIP than non-DIP joints. These findings support the anatomical and pathological link between nail and DIP joint disease.

Objective.This analysis aimed to evaluate the economic burden of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) on the UK healthcare system and estimate the relationship between functional status and direct healthcare costs.Methods.Functional status [measured using the Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI)], demographics, disease history, and healthcare resource use data were extracted from a cohort of patients at the Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, UK. Each resource use item per patient was then allocated a unit cost. Linear regression models were used to predict costs as a function of HAQ-DI. Medication costs were not included in the primary analysis, which was carried out from the UK National Health Service perspective.Results.Data were available for 101 patients. Mean HAQ-DI score was 0.84 (SD 0.75) and mean age at HAQ-DI measurement was 57.8 (SD 10.7). Total annual healthcare costs per patient, excluding medication costs, ranged between £174 and £8854, with a mean of £1586 (SD £1639). A 1-point increase in HAQ-DI score was associated with an increase in total costs of £547.49 (standard error £224), with secondary care consultations appearing to be the primary factor. Subgroup analyses suggested higher cost increases in patients with HAQ-DI scores of 2–3 and with a disease duration > 10 years.Conclusion.Patients with PsA place a significant economic burden on the healthcare system. Functional status is highly correlated with costs and appears to be driven mainly by the cost of secondary care consultations. Results were similar to previous studies in rheumatoid arthritis populations.

Objectives To characterise the 10 year relationship between anti-transcriptional intermediary factor 1 antibody (anti-TIF1-Ab) positivity and cancer onset in a large UK-based adult dermatomyositis (DM) cohort. Methods Data from anti-TIF1-Ab positive/negative adults with verified diagnoses of DM from UKMYONET were analysed. Each patient was followed up until they developed cancer. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox-proportional hazard modelling were employed to estimate cumulative cancer incidence. Results Data from 263 DM cases were analysed, with a total of 3,252 person-years and a median 11 years follow-up; 55 (21%) of DM cases were anti-TIF1-Ab positive. After 10 years of follow up, a higher proportion of anti-TIF1-Ab positive cases developed cancer, compared with anti-TIF1-Ab negative cases: 38% vs 15% (hazard ratio 3.4 [95% CI 2.2, 5.4]). All the detected malignancy cases in the anti-TIF1-Ab positive cohort occurred between 3 years prior to and 2.5 years after DM onset. No cancer cases were detected within the following 7.5 years in this group, whereas cancers were detected during this period in the anti-TIF1-Ab negative cases. Ovarian cancer was more common in the anti-TIF1-Ab positive vs negative cohort – 19% versus 2% respectively (p-value

Aims To evaluate the relationship between expression of myxovirus-resistance protein A (MxA) protein on muscle biopsies by immunohistochemistry and disease activity in juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) patients. Also, another aim was to investigate whether the expression of MxA is related with myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) status in JDM patients. Methods 103 patients (median aged 6.3, interquartile range 0.5-15.9) enrolled in the Juvenile Dermatomyositis Cohort and Biomarker Study (JDCBS). Muscle biopsies were stained with MxA and scored. Clinical data at initial presentation were collected and autoantibodies were analysed. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to estimate the association between MxA expression on muscle fibres and muscle disease activity, and MSA status. Results Expression of MxA protein on JDM samples was identified in 61.2%. There was a significant association between MxA scores and Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS) (P = 0.002), and Manual Muscle Testing of Eight Muscles (MMT8) (P = 0.026). CMAS and MMT8 scores were significantly lower in the group of patients with strong MxA expression. MxA scores differed according to MSA subgroups (P = 0.002). Patients with positive nuclear matrix protein 2 autoantibodies had strong MxA expression, whereas anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 positive patients had no or weak MxA expression. Conclusions This study reveals the significant association between level of MxA expression on muscle fibres and clinical measures of muscular disease activity in JDM patients and MSA status. This confirms type I interferonopathies in muscle fibres of JDM patients which could help with improving treatment outcome in JDM patients and underscoring the distinct pathophysiological pathways in different MSA status.

Background: SLE may be stratified according to a range of different immune assessments but the relationships between these are less well defined. MASTERPLANS is an MRC-funded consortium that seeks to identify immunophenotypic subgroups of patients that predict response to therapy. Objectives: Our objective here was to analyse a clinically well-phenotyped patients using a suite of immune assessments and identify inter-relationships between these features as well as subgroups of patients who may differ in response to therapy. Methods: 143 SLE patients were evaluated for clinical phenotype using BILAG-2004, autoantibodies using radioimmunoprecipitation (IP, University of Bath), two interferon scores (IFN-Score-A and IFN-Score-B), flow cytometry for major circulating immune cell subsets, as well as the surface protein expression of tetherin on each subset, a cell-specific assay for IFN response. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was used to define autoantibody subgroups. IFN scores (reflected dCT) were compared between the groups using multivariate models. Other variables were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test with pairwise comparisons. Results: Using IP, 141 patients could be divided into five subgroups: U1RNP/Sm+ only (n=23), Ro60+ only (n=8), U1RNP/Sm+Ro60+ (n=6), Ro60+Ro52+La+ (n=11), Ro52+ (n=16) and other ANA (n=77). Antibody subgroups was strongly associated with IFN-Score-A (F=4.39, p=0.001). Expression was lowest for “other ANA”, intermediate for single antibody groups, and highest with multiple positive antibodies. Multivariate linear regression, including interaction terms between antibody types, revealed that Ro60 and U1RNP/Sm were the independent predictors of IFN-Score-A level (p=0.051 and 0.009 respectively). There was no association between autoantibody status and IFN-Score-B (F=0.973, p=0.438). In flow cytometry, the U1RNP/Sm group was notable for significantly lower numbers of CD4-T-cells and memory-B-cells. Memory -B-cells were also lower in antibody-positive groups compared to “other ANA”. Tetherin expression was increased in antibody positive groups, but to a similar extent on most cell subsets. Memory B cell tetherin was significantly higher in the groups with multiple positive antibodies. U1RNP/Sm+ was associated with renal involvement (p=0.004). Mucocutaneous involvement was greater in the Ro60+Ro52+La+ group (p=0.037). Conclusion: This cohort revealed relationships between immune features. U1RNP/Sm antibody was notable for defining a group of patients with a cluster of immune abnormalities, including the greatest elevation of IFN activity, greater abnormalities on flow cytometry and clinical renal involvement. This was independent to the IFN-Score-B high status that predicts better clinical response to rituximab (presented elsewhere at this conference). Future work in MASTERPLANS will investigate the significance of these subgroups for response to therapy. Disclosure of Interests: Marta Aguilar-Zamora: None declared, Hui Lu: None declared, Zoe Betteridge: None declared, Katie Dutton: None declared, Md Yuzaiful Md Yusof: None declared, Antonios Psarras: None declared, The MASTERPLANS Consortium. : None declared, Neil McHugh: None declared, Edward Vital Grant/research support from: He has received honoraria and research grant support from Roche, GSK and AstraZeneca.

Objectives PsA is an inflammatory condition that can cause pain, fatigue, swelling and joint stiffness. The consequences include impaired physical function, a high psychosocial burden, reduced quality of life and work disability. The presenting symptoms can be non-specific and varied, leading to delays in diagnosis or referral to specialist teams. The aim of this study was to explore patients' experiences of being diagnosed and the initial management of PsA. Methods The study used a qualitative design, with data collected in one-to-one, face-to-face semi-structured interviews. Results Fifteen newly diagnosed patients ( Conclusion Participants were already dealing with functional limitations and were highly distressed and anxious by the time they received their diagnosis. Physical and mental outcomes could be improved by the implementation of existing psoriasis management guidelines and strategies for earlier referral from primary care to rheumatology and by the development of guidelines on educational, self-management and psychological support provision soon after diagnosis.