Marko Kangasniemi, Pantelis Lioumis, Erika Kirveskari, Mari A. Kaunisto, Jyrki P. Mäkelä, Hanna Harno, Juhani Ojala, Jukka Putaala, Selja Vaalto, Jukka Vanhanen, Eija Kalso, University of Helsinki, Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Helsinki Institute for Life Sciences, Aalto-yliopisto, Aalto University, Anestesiologian yksikkö, HUS Diagnostic Center, HUS Perioperative, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, HUS Medical Imaging Center, BioMag Laboratory, Kliinisen neurofysiologian yksikkö, Clinicum, Department of Neurosciences, Neurologian yksikkö, HUS Neurocenter, Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Helsinki Institute of Life Science HiLIFE, Department of Diagnostics and Therapeutics, and Eija Kalso / Principal Investigator
Funding Information: Source(s) of financial support: The study was supported by State funding for University‐level health research (TYH 2013311, Y122417012, and Y102218018), the Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation, the Emil Aaltonen Foundation, and the Finnish Medical Foundation. Funding Information: Eija Kalso has received personal fees for participation in advisory board meetings of Pfizer and Orion Pharma, unrelated to this work. Dr. Juhani Ojala reports grants from Suomen Lääketieteen säätiö, outside the submitted work. Dr. Jukka Vanhanen reports grants from The Emil Aaltonen Foundation, grants from State funding for university‐level health research, during the conduct of the study. Part of Dr. Mari A. Kaunisto's salary is covered by a large Finnish biobank study FinnGen, funded by 12 international pharmaceutical companies (Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Celgene, Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, GSK, Janssen, Maze Therapeutics, Merck/MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi) and Business Finland. Pantelis Lioumis has been consulting Nexstim Ltd. for issues not related to this study, such as motor and speech functional mapping until 2016. Dr. Jukka Putaala reports personal fees from Boehringer‐Ingelheim, personal fees and other from Bayer, grants and personal fees from BMS‐Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Abbott/St. Jude Medical, other from Vital Signum, other from Nokia Technologies, other from Bittium, other from BcB Medical, personal fees from Portola, personal fees from Terve Media, grants from Business Finland, grants from Amgen, personal fees from Herantis Pharma, other from Medixine, outside the submitted work; and he has participated in the European Stroke Organisation's guideline working groups on 1) poststroke hyperglycemia and 2) secondary prevention in patients with AF. He also has participated in the Finnish Duodecim Society's guideline working group on Ischemic stroke and TIA. The remaining authors have no potential conflicts to disclose. Conflict of Interest: Publisher Copyright: ©2021 The Authors. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Neuromodulation Society. Objectives: Central poststroke pain (CPSP), a neuropathic pain condition, is difficult to treat. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeted to the primary motor cortex (M1) can alleviate the condition, but not all patients respond. We aimed to assess a promising alternative rTMS target, the secondary somatosensory cortex (S2), for CPSP treatment. Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, Sham-controlled three-arm crossover trial assessed navigated rTMS (nrTMS) targeted to M1 and S2 (10 sessions, 5050 pulses per session at 10 Hz). Participants were evaluated for pain, depression, anxiety, health-related quality of life, upper limb function, and three plasticity-related gene polymorphisms including Dopamine D2 Receptor (DRD2). We monitored pain intensity and interference before and during stimulations, and at one month. A conditioned pain modulation test was performed using the cold pressor test. This assessed the efficacy of the descending inhibitory system, which maytransmit TMS effects in pain control. Results: We prescreened 73 patients, screened 29, and included 21, of whom 17 completed the trial. NrTMS targeted to S2 resulted in long-term (from baseline to one-month follow-up) pain intensity reduction of ≥30% in 18% (3/17) of participants. All stimulations showed a short-term effect on pain (17–20% pain relief), with no difference between M1, S2, or Sham stimulations, indicating a strong placebo effect. Only nrTMS targeted to S2 resulted in a significant long-term pain intensity reduction (15% pain relief). The cold pressor test reduced CPSP pain intensity significantly (p = 0.001), indicating functioning descending inhibitory controls. The homozygous DRD2 T/T genotype is associated with the M1 stimulation response. Conclusions: S2 is a promising nrTMS target in the treatment of CPSP. The DRD2 T/T genotype might be a biomarker for M1 nrTMS response, but this needs confirmation from a larger study.