1. ‘Facing conservation’ or ‘conservation with a human face’? People–park interactions in southern Ethiopia
- Author
-
Mulugeta Lemenih, Stefaan Dondeyne, Genaye Tsegaye, Jan Nyssen, Abraham Marye, Miet Maertens, and Jozef Deckers
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Cultural Studies ,History ,Economic growth ,Sociology and Political Science ,Population ,Wildlife ,010501 environmental sciences ,Fish stock ,Firewood ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Politics ,biology.animal ,education ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,education.field_of_study ,Hartebeest ,biology ,business.industry ,National park ,Environmental resource management ,Natural resource ,Geography ,Anthropology ,Political Science and International Relations ,business - Abstract
Whereas some conservationists argue that ‘people-oriented approaches’ failed to achieve conservation goals, Nechisar National Park presents a case where ‘strict conservation approaches’ have at best been only partly successful. Nechisar National Park, heralded as a success in the 1990s, today shows a collapsed population of the endemic Swayne’s hartebeest and severe degradation of the emblematic grasslands of the plains. The park is also heavily under pressure from firewood collectors and fish stocks have plummeted. Drawing on the concepts of ‘indirect’ and ‘direct’ costs/benefits of conservation areas – as proposed by Richard Bell – we wanted to get beyond the ‘strict’ versus ‘people-oriented’ conservation debate. Based on semi-structured interviews (12 women, 4 men) and oral testimonies (19 women, 17 men) we analyse how access to natural resources evolved under different political regimes and conservation strategies. The strict conservation approach resulted in strong opposition against the park...
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF