Search

Background Upper gastrointestinal cancers are aggressive malignancies with poor prognosis, even following multimodality therapy. As such, they require timely and accurate diagnostic and surveillance strategies; however, such radiological workflows necessitate considerable expertise and resource to maintain. In order to lessen the workload upon already stretched health systems, there has been increasing focus on the development and use of artificial intelligence (AI)-centred diagnostic systems. This systematic review summarizes the clinical applicability and diagnostic performance of AI-centred systems in the diagnosis and surveillance of esophagogastric cancers. Methods A systematic review was performed using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Review, and Scopus databases. Articles on the use of AI and radiomics for the diagnosis and surveillance of patients with esophageal cancer were evaluated, and quality assessment of studies was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of sequencing methodologies. Results Thirty-six studies that described the use of AI were included in the qualitative synthesis and six studies involving 1352 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. Of these six studies, four studies assessed the utility of AI in gastric cancer diagnosis, one study assessed its utility for diagnosing esophageal cancer, and one study assessed its utility for surveillance. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 73.4% (64.6–80.7) and 89.7% (82.7–94.1), respectively. Conclusions AI systems have shown promise in diagnosing and monitoring esophageal and gastric cancer, particularly when combined with existing diagnostic methods. Further work is needed to further develop systems of greater accuracy and greater consideration of the clinical workflows that they aim to integrate within.

Background. Treatment of wounds and wound infection is an important issue for the military medicine system and the national health care system of Ukraine. This is due to the actualization of combat surgical trauma as a result of the armed confrontation in the East of the country. It is also associated with a significant frequency of purulent necrotic complications in the structure of surgical morbidity. The purpose of the study was analysis of modern approaches to purulent wounds treatment and the range of topical medicines for their implementation. Materials and methods. National and international scientific literature used in the work; methods of systematic analysis and biblio-semantic research applied in the work. Results. The analysis showed that the treatment of purulent wounds is a complex and multicomponent process. The main tasks of this process are determined by the need to influence the main factors of pathogenesis, such as: quick wound cleansing; suppression of wound microflora; reduction of inflammatory-infiltrative processes in the wound; acceleration of reparative processes. The evolution of ideas about wound healing has gone through three stages that complemented the previous ones: I – the theory of moist wound management, II – the approach to treatment according to the phase of the wound process, III – the theory «Wound bed preparation». At the present stage the main approaches in the purulent wounds treatment are the pathogenetic orientation in accordance with the phase of the wound process. It includes: debridement, additional treatment of the postoperative wound, early closure of the wound defect, wound drainage, antibacterial therapy, elimination of the factors that slow down healing. The leading role in providing multimodality influence on factors of the pathogenesis belongs to topical medicines – antiseptics, antibiotics, enzymes, sorbents, drugs which promote repair and epithelization. Conclusions. 1. Treatment of purulent wounds remains an unresolved problem of the health care system. 2. At the present stage the main approaches in the purulent wounds treatment are the pathogenetic orientation in accordance with the phase of the wound process and influence on the main factors of pathogenesis. 3. The leading role in providing multimodality influence on factors of the pathogenesis belongs to soft dosage forms – ointments, creams, gels, which provide high therapeutic efficacy antiseptic, antibiotics, anti-inflammatory and reparative drugs in the affected area with minimal side effects. 4. The available range of medicines for the treatment of purulent wounds needs to be expanded by developing modern soft dosage forms with combined action., Актуальность. Лечение ран и раневой инфекции является важной проблемой как военной, так и общегосударственной системы здравоохранения Украины. Это обусловлено актуализацией боевой хирургической травмы вследствие вооруженного противостояния на Востоке страны и значительной долей гнойно-некротических осложнений в структуре хирургической заболеваемости. Цель исследования: анализ современных подходов к лечению гнойных ран и ассортимента лекарственных средств для местного применения для их реализации. Материалы и методы: в работе использованы национальные и международные литературные источники; использованы методы системного анализа и библиосемантического исследования. Результаты. Проведенный анализ засвидетельствовал, что лечение гнойных ран является сложным и многокомпонентным процессом, основные задачи которого определяются необходимостью воздействия на основные факторы патогенеза: быстрая очистка раны; угнетение жизнедеятельности раневой микрофлоры; уменьшение в ране воспалительно-инфильтративных процессов; ускорение репаративных процессов. Эволюция представлений о лечении ран прошла 3 этапа, которые не отрицали, а дополняли предыдущие: І – теория влажного заживления ран, ІІ –дифференцированный подход к лечению в соответствии с фазой раневого процесса, ІІІ – теория обработки основания раны «Wound bed preparation». На современном этапе основоположным подходом к лечению гнойных ран является патогенетическая направленность в соответствии с фазой раневого процесса, включающим следующие этапы: активную хирургическую обработку; дополнительную обработку послеоперационной раны; раннее закрытие раневого дефекта; дренирование раны; антибактериальную терапию; ликвидацию факторов, замедляющих заживление. Важное влияние на ведущие факторы патогенеза имеют лекарственные средства для местного применения – антисептики и антибактериальные средства, ферментные препараты, сорбенты, средства, способствующие репарации и эпителизации. Выводы. 1. Лечение гнойных ран остается нерешенной проблемой здравоохранения. 2. Принципиальными подходами в лечении гнойных ран на современном этапе являются патогенетическая направленность в соответствии с фазой раневого процесса и воздействие на основные факторы патогенеза. 3. Основная роль в обеспечении комплексного действия на факторы патогенеза принадлежит мягким лекарственным средствам – мазям, кремам и гелям, позволяющим в очаге поражения создавать высокую терапевтическую эффективность лекарственных веществ, имеющих антисептическое, антибактериальное, противовоспалительное и репаративное действие, при минимальных проявлениях побочного действия. 4. Существующий ассортимент лекарственных средств для лечения гнойных ран требует расширения путем разработки современных мягких лекарственных средств комбинированного действия., Актуальність. Лікування ран та ранової інфекції є важливою проблемою як для військової, так і загальнодержавної системи охорони здоров’я України. Це обумовлюється актуалізацією бойової хірургічної травми внаслідок збройного протистояння на Сході країни та значною часткою гнійно-некротичних ускладнень у структурі хірургічної захворюваності. Мета дослідження: аналіз сучасних підходів до лікування гнійних ран та асортименту лікарських засобів для місцевого застосування для їх реалізації. Матеріали та методи. У роботі використані національні та міжнародні літературні джерела; застосовано методи системного аналізу і бібліосемантичного дослідження. Результати. Проведений аналіз засвідчив, що лікування гнійних ран є складним та багатокомпонентним процесом, основні задачі якого визначаються необхідністю впливу на провідні фактори патогенезу: швидке очищення рани; пригнічення життєдіяльності ранової мікрофлори; зменшення в рані запально-інфільтративних процесів; прискорення репаративних процесів. Еволюція уявлень про лікування ран пройшла 3 етапи, що не заперечували, а доповнювали попередні: І – теорія вологого загоєння ран; ІІ – диференційований підхід до лікування відповідно до фази ранового процесу; ІІІ – теорія обробки основи рани «Wound bed preparation». На сучасному етапі основоположним підходом до лікування гнійних ран є патогенетична спрямованість відповідно до фази ранового процесу, що включає наступні етапи: активну хірургічну обробку; додаткову обробку післяопераційної рани; раннє закриття ранового дефекту; дренування рани; антибактеріальну терапію; усунення факторів, що уповільнюють загоєння. Важливе значення для впливу на провідні фактори патогенезу мають лікарські засоби для місцевого застосування – антисептики і антибактеріальні засоби, ферментні препарати, сорбенти, засоби, що сприяють репарації та епітелізації. Висновки. 1. Лікування гнійних ран залишається невирішеною проблемою охорони здоров’я. 2. Принциповими підходами в лікуванні гнійних ран на сучасному етапі є патогенетична спрямованість відповідно до фази ранового процесу та комбінований вплив на основні фактори патогенезу. 3. Провідна роль у забезпеченні комплексного впливу на фактори патогенезу належить м’яким лікарським засобам – мазям, кремам та гелям, які забезпечують у ділянці ураження високу терапевтичну ефективність лікарських речовин з антисептичною, антибактеріальною, протизапальною та репаративною активністю при мінімальних проявах побічної дії. 4. Наявний асортимент лікарських засобів для лікування гнійних ран потребує розширення шляхом розробки сучасних м’яких лікарських засобів комбінованої дії.

Esophageal cancer remains one of the leading causes of death from cancer across the world despite advances in multimodality therapy. Although early-stage disease can often be treated surgically, the current state of the art for locally advanced disease is concurrent chemoradiation, followed by surgery whenever possible. The uniform midline tumor location puts a strong importance on the need for precise delivery of radiation that would minimize dose to the heart and lungs, and the biophysical properties of proton beam makes this modality potential ideal for esophageal cancer treatment. This review covers the current state of knowledge of proton therapy for esophageal cancer, focusing on published retrospective single- and multi-institutional clinical studies, and emerging data from prospective clinical trials, that support the benefit of protons vs photon-based radiation in reducing postoperative complications, cardiac toxicity, and severe radiation induced immune suppression, which may improve survival outcomes for patients. In addition, we discuss the incorporation of immunotherapy to the curative management of esophageal cancers in the not-too-distant future. However, there is still a lack of high-level evidence to support proton therapy in the treatment of esophageal cancer, and proton therapy has its limitations in clinical application. It is expected to see the results of future large-scale randomized clinical trials and the continuous improvement of proton radiotherapy technology.

Background. Primary squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) of the thyroid is a very aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. There is no consensus for the management of primary squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) of the thyroid, and this is based on rare cases in which the frequency of occurrence is less than 1% of thyroid malignancies. How squamous cell carcinoma originates in the thyroid gland is an interesting topic to discuss, because the thyroid gland does not have a squamous cell epithelium. Case Presentation. A 43-year-old man was admitted to the DR Kariadi Hospital with complaints of a lump on the right neck. In June 2020, the patient complained of a lump in the right neck area with a diameter of about 1x1x1 cm, no pain. Ultrasound of the colli at the regional hospital showed the impression of multiple lymphadenopathy of the right colli level 2-5, and there were cystic nodules with solid parts in the right and left lobes of the thyroid suspected of being benign. An adenectomy operation was performed at a regional hospital and the impression of metastatic squamous undifferentiated carcinoma was obtained. Conclusion. The management of thyroid PSCC is a multimodality therapy, namely surgery, chemotherapy and radiation.

BACKGROUND. Contralateral axillary nodal metastases (CAM) is classified as stage IV disease, although many centers treat CAM with curative intent. We hypothesized that patients with CAM, treated with multimodality therapy, would have improved overall survival (OS) versus patients with distant metastatic disease (M1) and similar OS to those with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). METHODS. Using the NCDB (2004–2016), we categorized adult patients with node-positive breast cancer into three study groups: LABC, CAM, and M1. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to visualize the unadjusted OS. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association of study group with OS. RESULTS. A total of 94,487 patients were identified: 122 with CAM, 12,325 with LABC, and 82,040 with M1 (median follow-up 63.6 months). LABC and CAM patients had similar histology and rates of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy receipt. However, the CAM group had significantly larger tumors, more estrogen-receptor expression, higher T-stage, and more mastectomies than the LABC group. Compared with M1 patients, CAM patients were more likely to have grade 3 and cT4 tumors. Patients with CAM and LABC had similar 5-year unadjusted OS and significantly improved OS vs M1 patients. After adjustment, LABC and CAM patients continued to have similar OS and better OS vs M1 patients. CONCLUSIONS. CAM patients who receive multi-modal therapy with curative intent may have OS more comparable to LABC patients than M1 patients. Out data support a reevaluation of whether CAM should remain classified as M1, as N3 may better reflect disease prognosis and treatment goals.

Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a major occupational and environmental neoplasm. The purpose of this study was to validate the clinical and epidemiological factors, diagnosis, and initial treatment among MPM patients.Methods: We surveyed retrospective data from 152,921 cancer patients in 22 principal hospitals.Results: A total of 166 MPM cases were newly diagnosed. These patients consisted of 136 men and 30 women, with a median age of 69 years old. We estimated the incidence rate for MPM to be 0.55 cases per 100,000 person-years in this study. The ratio per 100,000 population-years was 0.39 in Fukui, 0.60 in Ishikawa, 1.02 in Toyama and 0.35 in Nagano. Forty-five patients were discovered at follow-up of other diseases. Forty-six cases were diagnosed as localized disease, while 13 had accompanying regional lymph node metastasis. Furthermore, 44 cases showed infiltration into adjacent organs. A histo-cytological diagnosis was made in 164 cases (98.8%). A surgical approach, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were performed for 33, 88, and 6 patients, respectively, while 44 patients (26.5%) received best supportive care. Multimodality therapy was conducted in just 3.0% of the MPM patients.Conclusion: MPM has a tragically rapid progression if discovered during follow-up of other diseases. Workers in health-related fields should be on high alert for aggressive MPM. New therapeutic options for MPM are urgently required.

Background and objectives Combination treatment with debulking surgical procedures, vascular and ablative lasers, and topical and intralesional vascular therapies may improve outcomes in nodular hypertrophic and mixed complex vascular malformations; however, there is a paucity of data reporting specific combinations of these treatments. We report 15 cases of complex vascular malformations, which were successfully treated with novel combinations of these modalities. Study design/materials and methods We performed a review of 15 patients treated with combination vascular laser therapy, electrosurgery, ablative laser technologies, and topical and intralesional vascular therapies from May 2000 to October 2020. Photographs were taken at intervals with attempts made for consistent lighting and positioning. Results All 15 patients achieved an excellent clinical response to combination therapy with visible improvement of the hypertrophic, textural, and vascular components of their lesions. No major complications or adverse events were encountered during any of the treatments. Conclusion Combination multimodality therapy with surgical debulking, laser technologies, and topical and injection therapies can be highly effective and efficient in treating complex vascular malformations. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Consolidation therapy describes dose intensification strategies or additional treatment performed following completion of the primary regimen. In the case of esophageal cancer, this applies to cases of potentially persistent disease after definitive multi-modality therapy, including surgery. Consolidation should also be considered for patients initially planned to undergo surgery after neoadjuvant therapy, but for any reason elected a nonoperative strategy during treatment. With the advent of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, additional options may be available for consolidation in the future.

Esophageal cancer commonly presents in advanced stage, and many patients will require palliative intervention. Endoscopic stenting remains an excellent first-line therapy; however, this should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting, considering expectations for long-term survival.

Vestibular schwannomas are WHO grade I tumors of the eighth cranial nerve that lead to hearing loss, tinnitus, vestibular dysfunction, and facial nerve compromise. The management of vestibular schwannomas consists of observation, radiosurgery, or microsurgical resection. In this review, we discuss the various treatment modalities specifically targeting large vestibular schwannomas in addition to their treatment risk profiles. Although there has been a trend towards treatment with radiosurgery for smaller lesions, consensus reports still advocate for surgical debulking in patients with large vestibular schwannomas. There has been a shift in management philosophy towards functional preservation at the cost of more extensive resection, yet subtotal resection of vestibular schwannomas is associated with higher rates of recurrence on follow-up. Some groups have demonstrated new promise for the management of large vestibular schwannomas with stereotactic radiosurgery alone and multimodality therapy involving subtotal surgical resection with planned postoperative radiosurgery to residual tumor. Although most groups would still advocate for microsurgical debulking of large vestibular schwannomas with evidence of brainstem compression, hybrid treatment strategies have become preferable. More work is required to determine which patients are at risk of progression after a subtotal resection to stratify those who should or should not receive postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery.

Background Optimal curative therapy for locally advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer might not be offered to elderly patients due to patient and treating physician perception of the high risk of therapy. To understand the risk of multimodality curative therapy, including surgical resection in the elderly population, we studied our experience with curative therapy in this patient population and compared the risks and outcomes with those in a younger population. Study Design Between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2019, four hundred and five consecutive patients with esophageal or EGJ cancer underwent primary treatment at our institution, including esophagectomy. Data collected included demographic information, tumor stage, preoperative Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, treatment variables, and short- and long-term outcomes. Patients who were 70 years or older were classified as the “older” group and patients younger than 70 years were “younger.” Results One hundred and eighty-eight younger (mean age 59 years) and 94 older (mean age 74 years) patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection for stage II and higher cancer. Preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologist and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were significantly worse in the older group. Postoperative atrial fibrillation and urinary retention developed more often in the older group. Despite this, the rate of postoperative Clavien-Dindo complication severity scores of 3 or higher, perioperative mortality rates, and lengths of stay were similar. Long-term age-adjusted survival rate was 44.8% at 5 years for the group 70 years or older and 39% for the group younger than 70 years (NS). Conclusions Patients 70 years and older with locally advanced esophageal or EGJ cancer should be evaluated for optimal curative therapy including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection. Although preoperative risk scoring and postoperative atrial arrythmias are higher in the older group, short- and long-term outcomes are not inferior in these patients.

Background: Uterine carcinosarcomas are very aggressive tumors in the womb that are associated with poor prognosis. They represent only less than 5% of uterine tumors and the incidence rate is less than 2 per 100,000 women per year. Objective: We reviewed diagnosis and treatment of women with uterine carcinosarcoma. To determine if lymphadenectomy, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are associated with decreased recurrence and increased survival. To prove that multimodality therapy including surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are the ideal treatment for this malignancy. Patients and Methods: The rarity of the tumor made us depend on thirty cases done over 5 years mainly stage 1, 2 and 3 in University of Aswan between 2014 and 2018. We abstracted: histopathology results, survival outcomes from archived medical reports for the qualifying cases and patient demographics. Patient age at surgery and preoperative CA-125 for patient demographics. Histopathological results: cancer stage, depth of myometrial invasion, grade. Treatment data: Surgical details and use of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both. Results: Most uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) patients are candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy combination therapy, but in-depth testing has not been widely used. The high rate of recurrence and poor overall survival indicate an ongoing need for clinical trials specifically. Hazard of death and recurrence decreased with chemotherapy multiagent and vaginal brachytherapy with five years of higher survival and disease free survival. Also lymphadenectomy decreased recurrence and rate of death associated with. Conclusion: Adjuvant chemotherapy with vaginal brachytherapy with lymphadenectomy were associated with increased survival and decreased recurrence of women with UCS.

Purpose Angiosarcoma is a sub-type of soft tissue sarcoma, often presenting as a multifocal or diffuse disease process with poor prognosis. This study presents outcomes of a single institution cohort of patients with angiosarcoma of the scalp and face following treatment with multimodality therapy, including high-dose-rate surface applicator (HDR-SA) brachytherapy, and represents the largest cohort utilizing this therapeutic approach. Material and methods Twenty patients with primary or recurrent angiosarcoma of the face or scalp were treated with HDR-SA brachytherapy between 2003-2018, with clinical characteristics and outcomes collected from medical records and used to identify prognostic features. Results Median follow-up was 45 months. Patients treated with HDR-SA brachytherapy had a 4-year local control rate of 63%, a 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate of 20%, and a 4-year overall survival rate of 54%. Disease features associated with worse loco-regional control (LRC) included location on the scalp (vs. face, p = 0.04) and tumor size ≥ 5 cm (p = 0.0099). Outcomes after HDR-SA brachytherapy for salvage therapy vs. HDR-SA brachytherapy as a component of an initial treatment approach were also significantly different, with worse LRC (p = 0.0084) and worse overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0019) in a setting of salvage therapy. Conclusions Local control rates following HDR-SA brachytherapy for scalp or face angiosarcoma are moderate and similar to what is described in the literature using a variety of local control treatment modalities. Smaller tumors and those involving the face rather than scalp had better outcomes. PFS rates were poor and there is a pressing need for treatment intensification and novel therapeutic options.

Introduction: Gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma is a leading cause of cancer-related death globally. Surgery is the cornerstone modality for cure where feasible. Clinical studies over the past two decades have provided evidence for the use of perioperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy to improve patient outcomes. However, there remains no global consensus in the optimal use of these therapies.Areas covered: In this review, the authors summarize the latest evidence for perioperative multimodality therapy in resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma including the use of combination chemotherapy and targeted therapy containing regimens. In addition, the authors discuss some of the clinical and molecular biomarkers, such as PET imaging and microsatellite instability which can inform future practice and further clinical investigation.Expert opinion: A multimodal approach has been proven to improve survival outcomes over surgery alone. Whilst there is no global standard of care for multi-modality therapies in resectable OG cancer, clinical trials are refining the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Further investigation is on-going to further optimize therapy and the integration of molecular targeted agents.

Background Adequate lymphadenectomy (AL) during surgical resection and delivery of multimodality therapy (MMT) are considered important for optimizing oncologic outcomes in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Both neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches to MMT delivery are considered acceptable treatment strategies. Our goal was to evaluate the association between MMT treatment approach, hospital practice patterns, and survival and to explore whether AL and MMT might represent measures of quality for locally advanced gastric cancer. Methods A national cohort study of 5433 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (≥cT2 and/or cN+) treated at 987 hospitals within the National Cancer Database (2006-2015). Patients were categorized as receiving a neoadjuvant therapy (NT) or adjuvant therapy (AT) approach. Patients were also categorized based on receipt of AL (≥15 nodes) and MMT (surgery with any preoperative, perioperative, or postoperative AT). Hospitals were stratified based on the predominant treatment approach and the proportion of patients that achieved performance benchmarks (AL ≥ 80%; MMT ≥ 75%). Multivariable Cox shared frailty modeling was used to evaluate the association with the overall risk of death. Results Overall, 54.5% of patients were treated with an AT and 45.6% with an NT approach. Relative to surgery alone, receipt of MMT by either approach was associated with decreased risk of death (NT-hazard ratio [HR]: 0.75, 95% confidence interval: [0.65-0.86]; AT-HR: 0.80 [0.71-0.90]). Relative to care at mixed pattern hospitals, care at predominantly AT hospitals was associated with an increased risk of death (HR: 1.28 [1.12-1.47]). Relative to patients whose care achieved no quality measures, AL (HR: 0.75, [0.67-0.82]) and MMT (HR: 0.68 [0.60-0.76]) were each associated with a reduced risk of death. Receipt of both measures was associated with an even greater reduction (HR: 0.47 [0.40-0.56]). Hospital performance on AL, MMT, or both measures was not associated with the risk of death. Conclusion Because over half of patients are treated with surgery first (many having surgery alone) and care at hospitals favoring a surgery first approach is associated with worse outcomes, quality improvement (QI) efforts should focus on increasing the use of NT strategies. Furthermore, delivery of AL and MMT together may represent an actionable, generalizable target for gastric cancer QI efforts because it improves survival and is unrelated to the context in which care is provided.

Background:Modern breast cancer (BC) treatment involves the use of multimodality therapy. Treatment delays are common and can be multifactorial. There are few studies examining the association between the duration of the time from diagnosis to completion of all acute BC treatment modalities and survival. This study is designed to determine if there is an association between time to complete treatment and survival. Study Design:A retrospective analysis was performed using data from The National Cancer Database (NCDB) to determine whether an association exists between the duration of time from diagnosis to completing all acute BC treatment (surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy) and survival. A second analysis was performed to determine if the association between treatment duration and survival varies by receptor status. Results:The NCDB data from BC patients diagnosed in 2010 was analyzed. The inclusion criteria included less than 80 years of age with a single cancer diagnosis, Stage I through III invasive breast cancer who required treatment with surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy. A total of 28,284 patients were included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 5.8 years. The order of treatment included 20,772 patients had treatment in the order of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy and 7,512 patients had treatment order chemotherapy, surgery and radiation therapy. A Cox proportional hazards model was developed and identified a cut off showing the risk of delaying completion of all treatment beyond 38 weeks was associated with decrease in overall survival. This was statistically significant with an adjusted hazard Ratio of 1.21. This cut off of 38 weeks was found to be significant regardless of receptors type. The statistically significant Hazard ratios for receptor subtypes include: Triple negative (HR: 1.188, 95%CI: 1.06-1.34), ER+PR+Her2- (HR: 1.22, 95%CI: 1.09-1.36), ER-PR-Her2+ (HR: 1.29, 95%CI: 1.004-1.67) and ER+PR+Her2+ (HR: 1.32, 95%CI: 1.01-1.72). The patients with treatment duration greater than 38 weeks were comprised of 4768(63.47%) neo-adjuvant chemotherapy patients and 8191 (39.43%) of the surgery first group. Conclusion: Efforts to improve the efficiency of multimodality BC treatment and reduce treatment delays should be a priority to optimize BC patient outcomes. Citation Format: Debra Ann Pratt, Talia Burneikis, Chao Tu, Stephen R. Grobmyer. Time to completion of breast cancer treatment and survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS11-34.

AIMS: National studies have demonstrated disparities in the treatment and survival of pancreatic cancer patients based on socioeconomic status (SES). This study aimed to identify specific differences in perioperative management and outcomes based on patient SES and to study the role of a multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) in mitigating any variations. METHODS: The study analyzed patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a large hospital system. The patients were categorized into groups of high and low SES and whether they were managed by the authors’ pancreatic cancer MDC or not. The study compared differences in disease characteristics, receipt of multimodality therapy, perioperative outcomes, and recurrence-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Of the 162 low-SES patients and 119 high-SES patients, 54% were managed in the MDC. Outside the MDC, low-SES patients were less likely to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had less minimally invasive surgery, a longer OR time, less enhanced recovery participation, and more major complications (p

To date, all efforts to fight gastrointestinal cancer, regardless of its origin and entity, have resulted in complex therapeutic regimens involving a combination of systemic therapy, radiation therapy and surgery. It is generally accepted across all disciplines that not one, but the combination and the proper timing of all modalities result in the best oncologic outcome.Here, we provide insight into the current and future value of multimodal therapeutic approaches for upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer. Various aspects of treatment as well as open questions regarding indication and timing of multimodal strategies are addressed in this review.In order to further improve the survival and quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal tumors in the future, scientifically proven multimodal therapy concepts are needed first and foremost. In addition, markers are pivotal to assign individual patients to a specific concept and to monitor the success of therapy. The main question is in which situation a neoadjuvant, perioperative or adjuvant radio-, chemo- or immunotherapy is superior. In fact, almost every curatively intended concept still contains surgical resection. Thus, improvement in surgical technique is also critical for multimodality concepts.

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly evolved into a global pandemic. Recent findings indicate an increased risk for kidney involvement, including progressive acute kidney injury (AKI) during COVID-19 infection, specifically in critically ill patients, and associated with high mortality rates. As no specific treatment options exist for AKI secondary to COVID-19, intensive care is largely supportive with a frequent need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Convalescent plasma (CP) has been approved as an emergency investigational drug with clinical benefits in observational studies. We described a first case of a patient with severe COVID-19 and AKI who had remarkable improvement in his respiratory status and in kidney function following CP therapy. Our findings demonstrate important therapeutic implications of effective multimodality therapy including CP when treating patients with COVID-19 and AKI.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive gastrointestinal malignancies despite multimodality therapy. In the last several years, genomic studies have revealed that carcinogenesis is driven largely by key driver mutations that can be targeted for oncologic therapy. In addition, advances in cancer immunology have identified receptors and monoclonal antibodies that can be manipulated into harnessing the power of the host's immune system for antitumor treatment. These strategies have generated a paradigm shift in the management of several cancer types, including those in the gastrointestinal tract. However, there are several complicating factors when translating the results to pancreatic cancer, including the dense, fibrotic stroma unique to this disease that may shield the cancer cells from both cytotoxic and immunologic agents. Although the majority of trials have been performed in the metastatic setting, this review will focus on both the historic studies that have defined this field as well as the emerging data arising from ongoing efforts to exploit newly discovered mutations and their druggable targets.

OBJECTIVE Cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) are often treated with endovascular therapy, but occasionally a multimodality approach including surgery and/or radiosurgery is utilized. Recurrence after an initial angiographic cure has been reported, with estimated rates ranging from 2% to 14.3%, but few risk factors have been identified. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with recurrence of dAVF after putative cure. METHODS The Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research (CONDOR) data were retrospectively reviewed. All patients with angiographic cure after treatment and subsequent angiographic follow-up were included. The primary outcome was recurrence, with risk factor analysis. Secondary outcomes included clinical outcomes, morbidity, and mortality associated with recurrence. Risk factor analysis was performed comparing the group of patients who experienced recurrence with those with durable cure (regardless of multiple recurrences). Time-to-event analysis was performed using all collective recurrence events (multiple per patients in some cases). RESULTS Of the 1077 patients included in the primary CONDOR data set, 457 met inclusion criteria. A total of 32 patients (7%) experienced 34 events of recurrence at a mean of 368.7 days (median 192 days). The recurrence rate was 4.5% overall. Kaplan-Meier analysis predicted long-term recurrence rates approaching 11% at 3 years. Grade III dAVFs treated with endovascular therapy were statistically significantly more likely to experience recurrence than those treated surgically (13.3% vs 0%, p = 0.0001). Tentorial location, cortical venous drainage, and deep cerebral venous drainage were all risk factors for recurrence. Endovascular intervention and radiosurgery were associated with recurrence. Six recurrences were symptomatic, including 2 with hemorrhage, 3 with nonhemorrhagic neurological deficit, and 1 with progressive flow-related symptoms (decreased vision). CONCLUSIONS Recurrence of dAVFs after putative cure can occur after endovascular treatment. Risk factors include tentorial location, cortical venous drainage, and deep cerebral drainage. Multimodality therapy can be used to achieve cure after recurrence. A delayed long-term angiographic evaluation (at least 1 year from cure) may be warranted, especially in cases with risk factors for recurrence.

Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) is a rare malignancy that poses management challenges. Although surgery and chemoradiation therapy (CRT) remain therapeutic mainstays, induction chemotherapy (IC) has emerged as a useful adjunct with locally advanced disease. This study used the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to examine treatment outcomes for patients diagnosed with SNSCC.The NCDB (2004-2015) was queried for cases with SNSCC. Multivariate hazard regression modeling was used to identify significant predictors of 24-month and 60-month overall survival (OS) including treatment modality.A total of 3516 patients with SNSCC met inclusion criteria, including 1750 patients (49.8%) treated with surgery ± adjuvant therapy, 1352 (38.5%) treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT) or CRT, 300 (8.5%) who underwent IC followed by definitive CRT, and 114 (3.2%) who received IC followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy. Hazard modeling for confirmed treatment modality significantly associated (p0.001) with OS after adjustment. Patients who received surgical intervention ± adjuvant therapy had lower 24-month and 60-month mortality risk compared to definitive RT or CRT (hazard ratio [HR] ≥ 1.97; p0.001) or IC followed by definitive CRT (HR ≥ 1.73; p0.001). Compared to primary surgery ± adjuvant therapy, patients undergoing IC then surgery had similar 24-month and 60-month OS (p ≥ 0.672) after adjustment.Multimodality therapy, including surgical intervention, associates with improved OS after multifactorial adjustments. IC followed by surgery associated with improved OS compared to IC, followed by CRT and CRT alone. Study results highlight the utility of surgery toward optimizing OS in patients with SNSCC and demonstrates the potential utility of IC when primary surgical management is not preferred.

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly being used in the management of patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); however, there is a lack of evidence regarding the benefit among these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate overall survival (OS) in PDAC patients with resectable disease treated with NAT or upfront resection through instrumental variable (IV) analysis. A national cohort study of resectable PDAC patients in the National Cancer Data Base (2007–2015) treated with either upfront surgery or resection after NAT. Using multivariable modeling and IV methods, OS was compared between those treated with NAT and upfront resection. The IV was hospital-level NAT utilization in the most recent year prior to treatment. The cohort included 16,666 patients (14,012 upfront resection; 2654 NAT) treated at 779 hospitals. Among those treated with upfront resection, 59.9% received any adjuvant therapy. NAT patients had higher median (27.9 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 26.2–29.1) and 5-year OS (24.1%, 95% CI 21.9–26.3%) compared with those treated with upfront surgery (median 21.2 months, 95% CI 20.7–21.6; 5-year survival 20.9%, 95% CI 20.1–21.7%). After multivariable modeling, NAT was associated with an approximately 20% decrease in the risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.73–0.84), and this effect was magnified in the IV analysis (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.47–0.79). In patients with resectable PDAC, NAT is associated with improved survival relative to upfront resection. Given the benefits of multimodality therapy and the challenges in receiving adjuvant therapy, consideration should be given to treating all PDAC patients with NAT.

Background Level 1 evidence for multimodal treatment of resectable gastric adenocarcinoma from the Intergroup 0116 (2001) and MAGIC (2006) trials demonstrated survival benefit of adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) and perioperative chemotherapy, respectively. We evaluated the adoption of evidence-based treatment in the post-MAGIC era and its impact on survival. Methods A total of 7058 patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma undergoing definitive surgical resection between 2004 and 2015 were analyzed using the National Cancer Database. Results Over the study period, the proportion of patients receiving adjuvant CRT decreased from 19.1% to 9.1%, while perioperative chemotherapy increased from 1.9% to 28.6%. Utilization of perioperative chemotherapy surpassed adjuvant CRT in 2011. Evidence-based treatment (either perioperative chemotherapy or adjuvant CRT) had better overall survival (OS) than other treatments for clinical stage II–III patients (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis of the whole study period, evidence-based treatments were associated with better OS (HR 0.67 [0.60–0.74], p < 0.05). Only 360/1262 (28.5%) patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group completed postoperative therapy, which was associated with improved OS (p < 0.05). For clinical stage III patients (n = 2402), only 806 (33.6%) received evidence-based treatment, while 487 (22.2%) underwent surgery alone. On multivariate analysis of these patients between 2010 and 2015, both perioperative chemotherapy (HR 0.49 [0.35–0.68]) and adjuvant CRT (HR 0.31 [0.21–0.44]) were associated with better OS than surgery alone (p < 0.05). Conclusions Since the INT-0116 and MAGIC trials, utilization of evidence-based treatments for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma has increased, with perioperative chemotherapy surpassing adjuvant CRT as the preferred practice. However, overall utilization of these regimens remains quite low nationally despite association with improved OS.

Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) is the most extensive form of surgery for mesothelioma, involving en bloc resection of visceral and parietal pleura, lung, diaphragm and pericardium, with reconstruction of the pericardium and diaphragm. It can be performed safely in carefully selected patients. It should be performed in experienced centers as part of a multimodality treatment plan. The SMART approach, with a short course of induction hemithoracic radiation followed by EPP has demonstrated safety and value of hypofractionated hemithoracic radiation combined with complete macroscopic resection. We are conducting a clinical trial with oligofractionated hemithoracic radiation in early-stage mesothelioma.

Introduction Ewing sarcoma (ES) is more common in children and relatively rare in adults. Adult ES has poor prognosis than children. Treatment approaches for adults have been extrapolated from pediatric experience. Data on adult ES are very few because of its rarity in adults. The present study was done to analyze the clinical profile and outcome of adult ES. Aims The aim was to study the clinical and pathological treatment and outcomes in adult ES. Subjects and Methods Between 2010 and 2017, a total of 73 ES patients with age more than 18 years were retrospectively analyzed. Survival analysis was done by plotting Kaplan–Meier curves. Results A total of 73 patients were diagnosed with ES during 2010 to 2017. Among them, 43 (58.9%) had localized disease with a median age of 24.5 years. Males were 44 (60.3%) and females were 29 (39.7). Pain (75.3%) was the most common symptom at presentation. Nine patients had incomplete details and were excluded from the analysis. Among 21 (28.8%) patients, the lung (61.9%) was the most common site of metastasis followed by the bone, bone marrow, and brain. The median number of chemotherapy cycles in the localized disease was 14 (range 1–17), and in metastatic disease, it was 4 (range 1–7). Univariate analysis was done with respect to age (< 25 vs. ≥25), gender, elevated or normal serum lactate dehydrogenase level, tumor size (< 8 cm versus ≥8 cm), site (axial versus extremity), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) given or not. NACT had a significant impact on overall survival (OS) and the rest had no effect. At a median follow-up of 40 months, the 3-year OS in localized disease was 87.4%. In metastatic disease, the median OS was 13 months with 3-year OS of 26%. Conclusions Outcomes with multimodality therapy in adult ES patients with localized disease are comparable to that of a pediatric cohort. However, metastatic disease has poor survival.

Definitive standard chemoradiation for locoregionally advanced carcinomas of the uterine cervix includes multimodality therapy consisting of concurrent cisplatin based chemoradiation comprising of external-beam radiotherapy with systemic chemotherapy followed by intracavitary brachytherapy. New developments in radiotherapy, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, which aim to improve tumor control rates and reduce associated toxicity have reopened the discussion regarding the benefit of intensification of concomitant or sequential systemic therapy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Intensification of systemic chemotherapy used in standard chemoradiation for cervical cancer is an attractive approach to improve disease control, but given the concerns regarding toxicity deserves further evaluation to ensure their safe use in patients. This is a review of published and ongoing studies investigating intensification of systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.

Introduction Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare malignancy, and curative resection is considered the main therapy. Use of chemotherapy and/or radiation in addition to surgery (multimodality therapy) is controversial. Objective To determine treatment factors that influence overall survival in RPS. Methods This retrospective Institutional Review Board-approved study identified patients with RPS treated at a single institution between 2000 and 2017. Patient, tumor, and treatment modalities were collected. Prism (v.8.2.1) was used to calculate Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results There were 695 patients with sarcoma between 2000 and 2017, and 61 adults had RPS. The mean age was 59 (range 31-86) years, with 57.4% females (n = 35). Patients were 68.9% Caucasian (n = 42), 21.3% Hispanic (n = 13), 8.2% black (n = 5), and 1.6% Asian (n = 1). There were 4 patients who had neoadjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, n = 3; radiation, n = 2) and 17 who had adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, n = 6; radiation, n = 14). There was no significant difference in survival between the groups who received multimodality therapy compared to surgery alone. There was a significant improvement in the median overall survival for patients who underwent one or multiple surgeries ( P < .05). Conclusions These institutional data suggest that treatment factors associated with overall survival included multiple resections. Use of multimodality therapy was low and did not influence overall survival in patients with RPS compared to surgery alone.

Lymph node-positive biliary tract cancers have poor overall survival. Surgical resection followed by systemic chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment. We sought to assess the delivery of multimodality therapy in the United States.The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database was used to identify patients with node-positive biliary tract cancers without distant metastases from 2000 to 2014. Patients were stratified by disease subtype (gallbladder cancer, intrahepatic, extrahepatic, or hilar cholangiocarcinoma) and treatment received (surgery alone, chemotherapy alone, or surgery + chemotherapy). Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard modeling.A total of 3226 patients with node-positive biliary tract cancers were identified. Of 2837 patients who underwent surgical resection, 1386 (49%) received no systemic chemotherapy following surgery, while 1451 (51%) received surgery + chemotherapy. A total of 389 patients (12%) received chemotherapy alone. Median overall survival was longer for patients who underwent surgery + chemotherapy (19 months, p 0.0001). There was no difference in survival for those who received surgery alone versus chemotherapy alone (10 months for both, p = NS). Receipt of surgery + chemotherapy was independently associated with survival on Cox proportional hazard ratio modeling compared to surgery alone (HR for mortality 1.71, 95% CI 1.56-1.87, p 0.0001) or chemotherapy alone (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.46-1.92, p 0.0001). These trends were consistent across all disease subtypes.Optimal survival for node-positive biliary tract cancers depends on multimodality therapy. Following surgery, a substantial proportion of patients do not receive guideline recommended adjuvant therapy.

Children with relapsed neuroblastoma have a poor prognosis despite modern multimodality therapy. Novel and more effective therapeutic strategies are required for relapsed neuroblastoma. We retrospectively examined the utility of consolidation therapy with high-dose 131I-meta-iodo-benzyl-guanidine (131I-mIBG) in relapsed neuroblastoma or ganglioneuroblastoma patients with complete response (CR) to induction therapy as demonstrated by diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy. Between December 2009 and 2014, five patients with relapsed neuroblastoma and one with relapsed ganglioneuroblastoma received high-dose 131I-mIBG therapy. Overall and progression-free survival rates at five years after 131I-mIBG therapy were analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method. During follow-up, three children showed no signs of disease relapse, whereas three died. One child without a relapse died from post-transplant side effects, and two children with a relapse died owing to tumor progression. The 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates after 131I-mIBG therapy were 44% and 67%, respectively. Consolidation therapy with high-dose 131I-mIBG for patients with 2nd CR showed good overall and progression-free survival. While the risks of radiation exposure must be considered, high-dose 131I-mIBG therapy as consolidation therapy needs to be further investigated.

Administration of dexamethasone to mitigate postoperative nausea and vomiting has been suggested to improve short- and long-term outcomes after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resection. This study aimed primarily to evaluate these hypotheses in a contemporary patient cohort treated with multimodality therapy. The clinicopathologic and perioperative characteristics of consecutive resected PDAC patients (July 2011 to October 2018) were analyzed from a prospectively maintained database. Intraoperative administration of dexamethasone (4–10 mg) was retrospectively abstracted from the electronic medical record. The majority of 373 patients (59.8%) received intraoperative dexamethasone. Most of these patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy (75.3%), were potentially resectable at presentation (69.7%), and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (79.9%). Women were more likely to receive dexamethasone than men (69.9 vs 30.1%; p

The management of skull base malignancies continues to evolve with improvements in surgical technique, advances in radiation delivery and novel systemic agents. In this review, we aim to discuss in detail the management of common skull base pathologies which typically require multimodality therapy, focusing on the radiotherapeutic aspects of care. Technological advances in the administration of radiation therapy have led to a wide variety of different treatment strategies for the treatment of skull base malignances, with outcomes summarized herein. Radiation treatment plays a key and critical role in the management of patients with skull base tumors. Recent advancements continue to improve the risk/benefit ratio for radiotherapy in this setting.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify the survival of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and assess the effect of surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy on patient outcomes. BACKGROUND: An increasing number of LAPC patients who respond favorably to neoadjuvant therapy undergo surgical resection. The impact of surgery on patient survival is largely unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All LAPC patients who presented to the institutional pancreatic multidisciplinary clinic (PMDC) from January 2013 to September 2017 were included in the study. Demographics and clinical data on neoadjuvant treatment and surgical resection were documented. Primary tumor resection rates after neoadjuvant therapy and overall survival (OS) were the primary study endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 415 LAPC patients were included in the study. Stratification of neoadjuvant therapy in FOLFIRINOX-based, gemcitabine-based, and combination of the two, and subsequent outcome comparison did not demonstrate significant differences in OS of 331 non-resected LAPC patients (P = 0.134). Eighty-four patients underwent resection of the primary tumor (20%), after a median duration of 5 months of neoadjuvant therapy. FOLFIRINOX-based therapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy correlated with increased probability of resection (P = 0.006). Resected patients had better performance status, smaller median tumor size (P =0.029), and lower median CA19–9 values (P < 0.001) at PMDC. Patients who underwent surgical resection had significant higher median OS compared with those who did not (35.3 vs 16.3 mo, P < 0.001). The difference remained significant when non-resected patients were matched for time of neoadjuvant therapy (19.9 mo, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection of LAPC after neoadjuvant therapy is feasible in a highly selected cohort of patients (20%) and is associated with significantly longer median overall survival.

BACKGROUND. Surgery alone is standard-of-care for stage I gastric adenocarcinoma; however, clinicians can offer preoperative therapy for clinical stage I disease with signet ring cell histology, given its presumed aggressive biology. We aimed to assess the validity of this practice. METHODS. The National Cancer Database (2004–2015) was reviewed for patients with clinical stage I signet ring cell gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent treatment with surgery alone, perioperative chemotherapy, neoadjuvant therapy, or adjuvant therapy. Analysis was stratified by preoperative clinical/pathologic stage. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS. Of 1018 patients, median age was 60 years (±14); 53% received surgery alone (n = 542), 5% received perioperative chemotherapy (n = 47), 12% received neoadjuvant therapy (n = 125), and 30% received adjuvant therapy (n = 304). For clinical stage I disease, surgery alone was associated with an improved 5-year OS rate (71%) versus perioperative chemotherapy (58%), neoadjuvant therapy (38%), or adjuvant therapy (52%) [overall p

Background: Colorectal cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-associated death in the world. The 5-year local recurrence rates in patients undergoing multimodality therapy are approximately 5-10%. The standard approach to treat locally recurrent rectal is re-irradiation followed by surgical resection. Recent reports have suggested that the treatment outcomes with carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) in recurrent rectal cancer are promising and have superior results compared to photon therapy. Hence, we performed a systematic review to evaluate the patterns of care and treatment outcomes of recurrent rectal cancer patients treated with CIRT.Methodology: We performed a systematic search to identify the articles that reported on CIRT use in recurrent rectal cancer.Results: Systematic search of PubMed and Cochrane Central resulted in 98 abstracts. Eight studies fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria. Among eight studies, one study is a prospective phase I/II study done in Japan; three prospective studies are ongoing (PANDORA-01 trial, HIMAT1351trial, and a phase II study of reirradiation for prior CIRT), and five studies are institutional reports on role of CIRT. These studies were predominantly reported from Japan and Germany. All reports except one were performed in patients who have not received prior radiation. The most commonly utilized treatment prescription was 73.4 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions over 4 weeks in patients without any prior history of radiation and 36 Gy in 12 fractions over 3 weeks at 3 Gy per fraction in patients with prior photon radiation to the pelvis. There is one ongoing trial assessing the role of carbon ion re-irradiation in patients who had prior CIRT for rectal cancer.Conclusion: CIRT holds immense promise in improving outcomes in locally recurrent rectal cancer. There is a need for more multi-institutional prospective clinical trials to assess the role of CIRT.

Locally advanced, stage IIIA-N2 Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a heterogeneous patient population. Considerable controversy exists as to the optimal management of these patients. Local therapy alone with a single modality, namely surgery or radiation, is associated with high recurrence rates and low overall survival. Consequently, multimodality treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, with or without the utilization of surgery) has developed as a means of both local and systemic control for patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC, and has led to improved overall survival. While it is clear that multimodality therapy is beneficial, the ideal composition of the treatment regimen remains a work in progress. As a result, the optimal management of patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC is widely debated, as is the role for surgery in a multimodality treatment regimen. Herein, we review the current literature supporting multimodality therapy for stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC with an emphasis on the data supporting the role of surgery in resectable and potentially resectable patients.

Several authors have previously reported that patients with pulmonary combined large cell neuroendocrine cancer ( LCNEC) have a poor prognosis and there is no consensus on the treatment strategy for combined LCNEC as well as LCNEC. Here, we report the case of a long‐term survivor with pulmonary combined LCNEC. The patient was a 60‐year‐old man who underwent thoracoscopic right lower lobectomy. The final histopathology and staging of the tumor showed LCNEC combined with squamous cell carcinoma and T2aN0M0 stage IB. Multimodality treatments including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery for several recurrences were performed after the pulmonary surgery. After immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with nivolumab, all the metastatic lesions shrunk and a partial response was maintained at five years after the first surgery. In our case, ICI after multimodality therapy combining cytotoxic anticancer drugs and radiotherapy was effective in LCNEC with metachronous multiple metastases. Key points Significant findings of the study Immune checkpoint inhibitor after multimodality therapy combining cytotoxic anticancer drugs and radiotherapy was effective in LCNEC with metachronous multiple metastases. The patient survived over five‐years after the first surgery. What this study adds Immune checkpoint inhibitor may be effective in some LCNEC patients.

The 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID‐19) pandemic has created significant challenges to the delivery of care for patients with advanced head and neck cancer requiring multimodality therapy. Performing major head and neck ablative surgery and reconstruction is a particular concern given the extended duration and aerosolizing nature of these cases. In this manuscript, we describe our surgical approach to provide timely reconstructive care and minimize infectious risk to the providers, patients, and families.

Background I-meta-iodo-benzylguanidine (I-mIBG) therapy has been used in treatment of for advanced neuroblastoma for many years with promising results. There are several studies regarding predictors and outcomes of I-mIBG therapies in relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma patients. Objective To identify the predictors and outcomes of I-mIBG treatment in relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. Methods This study was a retrospective review of 22 patients with high risk stage IV relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma who received at least one cycle of I-mIBG therapy. Patient' characteristics, hematologic toxicity, scintigraphic semi-quantitative scoring, and overall survival were recorded. Factors predicting survival were analyzed. Results Twenty-two patients (50% male) with mean age of 3.7 years (4.8 months to 8.3 years) received I-mIBG therapies at an average of 3.8 and mean dose of 136 mCi (5032 MBq) per treatment. Most common acute hematologic toxicity was thrombocytopenia. Overall 5-year survival rate was 37% (95% confidence interval: 16.3-58.0) and median survival time was 2.8 year (95% confidence interval: 1.38-6.34). Patients with rising Curie score of ≥25% upon the second therapy were major determinants of overall survival with poorer response to treatment. At least three treatments of I-mIBG were needed to identify some degrees of survival prolongation (crude hazard ratio: P-value = 0.003). Age, sex, metastatic status, and baseline Curie scoring system were good predictors associated with survival. Seven patients (32%) demonstrated objective responses. Conclusion Despite multimodality therapy, high risk neuroblastoma had a propensity of treatment failure in terms of relapsed or refractory, with some objective responses after I-mIBG treatments. The declined or non-rising Curie score upon second post-treatment total body scan was an important predictor of survival and aided a decision whether or not to proceed with bone marrow transplantation.

Background The goal of surveillance testing is to enable curative salvage therapy through early disease detection, however supporting evidence in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is limited. We evaluated frequency of successful salvage therapy and outcomes in patients who underwent surveillance. Methods A single‐site, retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify all patients who received curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Surveillance testing were those investigations not triggered by abnormal symptoms, physical examination, or blood tests. Successful salvage therapy was any potentially curative therapy for disease recurrence which resulted in postrecurrence disease‐free survival ≥2 years. Time‐to‐event data were analyzed using the Kaplan‐Meier method and log rank tests. Results Between 2011 and 2016, 210 consecutive patients were reviewed. Esophageal (14%), gastroesophageal junction (40%), and gastric adenocarcinomas (45%) were treated with surgery alone (29%) or multimodality therapy (71%). Adjuvant therapy was administered in 35%. At median follow‐up of 38.3 months, 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate was 56%. Among 97 recurrences, 53% were surveillance‐detected, and 46% were symptomatic. None was detected by surveillance endoscopy. Median time‐to‐recurrence (TTR) was 14.8 months. Recurrences included locoregional only (4%), distant (86%), and both (10%). Salvage therapy was attempted in 15 patients, 4 were successful. Compared to symptomatic recurrences, patients with surveillance‐detected recurrences had longer median OS (36.2 vs 23.7 months, P = .004) and postrecurrence survival (PRS, 16.5 vs 4.6 months, P, For resected gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma treated at our institution, routine surveillance testing rarely enabled successful salvage therapy, did not detect recurrence earlier, and did not extend duration of palliative chemotherapy. Further prospected data is warranted to establish the role of surveillance testing in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Surgical resection of high-grade brainstem gliomas is challenging and treatment mostly involves radiation and chemotherapy. In this study, we utilized registry data to determine prognostic features and impact of chemotherapy and radiation on overall survival. The National Cancer Database was queried from 2006 to 2015 for adult cases with histologically confirmed high-grade brainstem glioma. Covariates including patient demographics, comorbidities, tumor characteristics and treatment parameters were captured. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to identify predictors of survival. A total of 422 patients were analyzed. Most patients (66.6%) underwent postoperative radiation with chemotherapy, 9.2% underwent radiation alone, while the remaining had no postoperative treatment (24.2%). Overall median survival was 9.8 months (95% CI 8.8–12). Survival was longer (p

Androgen deprivation therapy as single modality therapy was the standard management for oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa). Current paradigm shifts toward a multimodality therapy approach, targeting all sites of disease, including treatment of the primary in the form of radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. The objective of this article was to reveiw the literature regarding the role of surgery in oligometastatic PCa. PubMed and MEDLINE electronic databases were queried for English language articles from January 1, 1980 to March 31, 2019. Keywords use included oligometastatic PCa, metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa), radical prostatectomy, and cytoreductive prostatectomy. Preclinical, prospective, and retrospective studies were included. There is no published randomized controlled trials, evaluating the role of surgery in mPCa. Preclinical and retrospective data suggest benefit of primary tumor treatment in mPCa. Current literature supports the concept of cytoreductive surgery as it can prevent late symptomatic local progression, has acceptable complications, and may prolong survival in patients with mPCa. Surgery is a feasible procedure in mPCa which may improve outcome in mPCa. However, there is no Level 1 evidence, yet that support the role of surgery in mPCa. The results from well-organized prospective, randomized controlled trials are awaited before performing radical prostatectomy for mPCa in clinical practice. Keywords: Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy, Metastatic prostate cancer, Oligometastatic prostate cancer, Radical prostatectomy, Surgery in metastatic, Treatment of primary tumor

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence has shown the effectiveness of surgery for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Present study aims to summarize the experience of our institution in dealing with advanced NSCLC in the context of multimodality therapy including lung surgery. METHODS: Patients underwent surgical resection for stage IV NSCLC diagnosed before or during surgery from January 2014 to June 2017 at Tangdu Hospital were included in this study. RESULTS: There were 88 stage IV NSCLC patients enrolled in this study. Among them, 35 patients with pleural metastases, 18 with brain oligometastases, 25 with extra-brain oligometastases and 10 with multiple metastatic sites or organs. For primary lung tumor, almost all (86/88) were resected with R0. For metastatic lesions, 53 patients received curative local treatment and 9 patients with partial treatment. There were 62 patients received adjuvant treatment, 10 patients received no adjuvant treatment and 16 patients with missing data of adjuvant treatment. The median overall survival of patients was 31.72 months. The estimated 3-year OS was 42.2%. Patients with pleural metastases and brain oligometastases got better outcomes than the ones with extra-brain oligometastases and multiple metastases (P

Urinary diversion and reconstructive urologic procedures are most often performed by incorporating various intestinal segments into the urinary tract. Although the risk of malignancy, among other complications, is well recognized and occurs most frequently after ureterosigmoidostomies and cystoplasties, data on the histopathologic and immunohistochemical characteristics of these tumors are scant. This study aims to evaluate the clinicopathological features of secondary tumors arising after urologic reconstruction procedures. Eleven cases were identified among five collaborating academic institutions. The average age was 51.7 years, and the M:F ratio was 8:3. Surgical procedures included 7 ileal conduits, 2 gastrocystoplasties, 1 augmentation cystoplasty not otherwise specified (NOS), and 1 Indiana pouch. Median time from reconstruction to malignancy was 36 years. Malignancy included adenocarcinoma in 10 patients (intestinal type in 6, gastric in 2, signet-ring cell in 1, undetermined type after neoadjuvant treatment in 1) and squamous cell carcinoma in 1. By immunohistochemistry, the adenocarcinomas were CK7 (45%), CK20 (89%), CK903 (78%), CDX2 (89%), SATB2 (67%), and beta-catenin (100%) positive. GATA-3 was negative in all cases. Pathologic stage was T1 (30%), T2 (40%), T3 (20%), and T4 (10%). Regional lymph node and distant metastasis were present in 60% and 20%, respectively. Treatment included multimodality therapy in most patients. On follow-up (mean, 27.4 months), 2 patients were dead (1 of disease), 3 were alive with disease, 4 were alive without disease, and 2 were lost to follow-up. Secondary malignancy arising within urologic reconstruction is rare, most frequently has adenocarcinoma morphology, presents late, and behaves aggressively.

Gastric adenocarcinoma is one of the most common and lethal cancers worldwide and is associated with a high frequency of nodal metastasis. The value of multimodality therapy is well-established, but gastric resection and locoregional lymph node dissection are important mainstays in potentially curative therapy. However, there has been considerable regional variation in surgical approach and debate regarding the ideal extent of gastric resection, gastric reconstruction, and extent of lymphadenectomy. This chapter outlines the current evidence in the surgical management of gastric adenocarcinoma. The advent of minimally invasive approaches to gastric operations is also discussed.

The management of pleural mesothelioma has changed with the demonstration that first-line checkpoint blockade therapy improves survival. This review covers issues of relevance to the practicing medical oncologist, with an emphasis on the palliative setting and on new information. Until recently, standard systemic therapy for mesothelioma was combination chemotherapy with platinum and pemetrexed. In 2020, combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab was approved as first-line systemic therapy for mesothelioma following release of the results from the CheckMate 743 trial. This trial showed improved overall survival for patients receiving ipilimumab and nivolumab over those treated with platinum and pemetrexed chemotherapy. When the survival results were examined by histologic subtype, the survival benefit was most significant in those with nonepithelioid mesothelioma, a group for which combination immunotherapy is now standard of care. The most important outstanding issue from CheckMate-743 is a better understanding, through translational studies, of which patients with epithelioid mesothelioma may benefit from combination immunotherapy. The next generation of first-line clinical trials in mesothelioma will report the results of first-line combination chemoimmunotherapy. For those patients who receive first-line dual checkpoint blockade, there is no evidence as to the efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy. However, given the known first-line efficacy of cisplatin or carboplatin and pemetrexed, combination chemotherapy is an appropriate subsequent choice for those who progress on or after dual immunotherapy. For those who previously received chemotherapy without immunotherapy, single-agent nivolumab provides benefit over best supportive care. In summary, both chemotherapy and immunotherapy should be considered for all patients during their disease course. Another topical issue is the growing appreciation that some individuals have an inherited predisposition to mesothelioma; referral to a clinical geneticist should be considered under some circumstances. The role of surgery and multimodality therapy is controversial, with results awaited from the fully recruited MARS-2 clinical trial. Patient selection, staging, and multidisciplinary review are critical to identify those who might benefit from a multimodality approach. Finally, a proactive, multidisciplinary approach to symptom management and the principles of management of pleural effusions are critical to manage the symptom burden of mesothelioma and optimize patient well-being.

The article is dedicated to the advanced multimodality therapy of the patients with odontogenic osteomyelitis of the jaws and its complications with local application of platelet enriched with plasma in the patients with diabetes mellitus taking into account the nature of the course of the inflammatory process. Platelet auto plasma is a highly active biological stimulator of regeneration processes owing to various growth factors contained in alpha granules of platelets, acting on all structural units of the surrounding tissue and stimulating regeneration processes. The article defines the use of platelet autoplasma and their advantage in the treatment of abscesses and phlegmon of the maxillofacial area in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be avoided not only in patients with negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) but also in those with one or two positive SLNs receiving breast or axillary radiation. However, ALND has remained the standard treatment for patients with clinically positive nodes (cN+). Although axillary reverse mapping (ARM) was developed to map and preserve arm lymphatic drainage during ALND, it could not be indicated for cN + patients because metastatic rate of ARM nodes is high. However, a new type of conservative ALND with ARM attempts to preserve ARM lymphatics and nodes except SLNs and other suspicious palpable nodes, including suspicious ARM nodes. This procedure allowed reduction of the rate of arm lymphedema without increasing axillary recurrence, although patients received postoperative chemotherapy and high-risk patients underwent axillary radiation. Thus, a traditional full ALND may not be necessary for cN + patients in the era of effective multimodality therapy.