Search

Biallelic mutations in POLR3A have been associated with childhood-onset hypomyelinating leukodystrophies and adolescent-to-adult-onset spastic ataxia, the latter of which has been linked to the intronic variant c.1909 + 22G>A. We report a case of adult-onset spastic ataxia in a 75-year-old man, being a compound heterozygous carrier of this variant, whose brain and spinal cord were for the first time investigated by neuropathological examination. We describe prominent degeneration of the posterior columns, spinocerebellar tracts, and anterior corticospinal tracts of the spinal cord in a pattern resembling Friedreich's ataxia, with a notable lack of significant white matter pathology throughout the brain, in marked contrast with childhood-onset cases. Immunohistochemical examination for the POLR3A protein demonstrated no apparent differences in localization or staining intensity between the proband and an age-matched control subject. We demonstrate the clinicopathologic description of POLR3A-related neurodegenerative disease and also mention the differential diagnosis of the childhood-onset hypomyelinating leukodystrophy and late-onset spastic ataxia phenotypes.

Genetic testing has become routine for many inherited conditions; however, little is known about the unique issues that arise when offering genetic testing for inherited forms of dementia. To better understand the patient perspective, we surveyed study participants about their experiences as they underwent genetic counseling and genetic testing for dementia. We recruited 50 pairs of subjects. Each pair was comprised of one person with cognitive impairment and a cognitively intact co-participant. Study participants received pre- and post-test genetic counseling and comprehensive genetic testing for dementia. During the study, participant pairs completed four surveys which asked about their experience. Testing began with a 38 gene dementia panel. Participants with negative panel results or variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were reflexed to exome sequencing (ES). Twenty-nine participants (58%) reported that their primary motivation to join the study was for the benefit to their families. Fifty-two percent of participants initially planned to use their test results to make health and wellness changes, but, six months after disclosure, only 31% had done so. Six months after result disclosure, approximately 90% of participant pairs accurately recalled their genetic test results. Overall satisfaction with testing was high, and decision regret was negligible. This observational study describes the experiences of study participants undergoing genetic counseling and genetic testing for dementia and found that most participant pairs accurately recalled their results up to six months following disclosure while also maintaining high levels of satisfaction without decision regret. These findings suggest that, in the context of genetic counseling, genetic testing can be effectively used in this population.

Background Metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is an inherently diverse disease and while molecular classification of mTNBC has assisted in treatment decisions, if based on only an initial biopsy, it does not take into account the evolution of metastatic cancer. Characterization of emerging metastases is needed to reveal both new resistance or sensitivity to available therapeutics. The goal of “Intensive Trial of OMics in Cancer (ITOMIC) - Intensive Longitudinal Monitoring in Subjects With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer” (NCT01957514) - was to determine the feasibility of longitudinal collection of patient biopsies that would be subjected to molecular analysis to provide actionable, relevant and timely information to guide treatment decisions.Methods Multiple biopsies were collected longitudinally, including pre- and post-treatment, from 29 mTNBC patients enrolled in the ITOMIC study and subjected to multi-dimensional molecular profiling including WES, WGS, cancer gene panel sequencing, RNA-seq, and proteomics and/or IHC for tumor biomarkers. This information was used to guide iterative, patient- and tumor- individualized treatment recommendations made by a multi-institutional ITOMIC Tumor Board (ITB) and conveyed to each subject’s oncologist.Results Longitudinal biopsy collection was found to be safe. Molecular profiling revealed that 2 of an original 31 enrolled subjects likely had lung cancer rather than mTNBC, supporting the merit of repeated tissue analysis. While the other 29 subjects had all been given a diagnosis of mTNBC before entering the trial, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and/or HER2 were found to be over-expressed in at least one sample for 12 subjects; appearance of receptor positivity suggests targeted therapy may be effective. Tumor evolution in response to the first on-study treatment for most subjects (cisplatin) was revealed by copy number alterations, changes in single nucleotide variants, and insertions/deletions in pre-/post-treatment biopsies. Over the course of the study, the ITB convened 54 times and 39 of 182 recommended treatments were evaluated and accessed through either an existing clinical trial, a single patient IND, approved off label or label indication. While not all ITB treatment recommendations were followed, 24 subjects did receive at least one ITB-recommended drug, frequently as part of a clinical trial. Currently, for 27 subjects (2 withdrew) median survival is ~31 months. There are 4 surviving patients in treatment with a remarkable median survival of >51 months.Conclusion Collection and molecular analysis of multiple biopsies during the course of patient’s disease, shown here to be safe and feasible, provides information vital to appropriate treatment choice and reveals new targets for and resistance to therapy in metastatic TNBC. Citation Format: Kimberly A Burton, Eric Q Konnick, Sibel Blau, Michael O Dorschner, Julie Gralow, Rahul Parulkar, Elisabeth Mahen, Patricia Spilman, Stephanie Parker, Francis M Senecal, Colin Pritchard, Christopher Szeto, Jing Zhu, Vijayakrishna K Gadi, Stephen C Benz, Shahrooz Rabizadeh, Patrick Soon-Shiong, Carl Anthony Blau. Multidimensional molecular profiling of repeated metastatic TNBC biopsies in the intensive trial of omics safely guides treatment decisions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS11-13.

As clinical testing for Mendelian causes of colorectal cancer (CRC) is largely driven by recognition of family history and early age of onset, the rates of such findings among individuals with prevalent CRC not recognized to have these features is largely unknown. We evaluated actionable genomic findings in community-based participants ascertained by three phenotypes: (1) CRC, (2) one or more adenomatous colon polyps, and (3) control participants over age 59 years without CRC or colon polyps. These participants underwent sequencing for a panel of genes that included colorectal cancer/polyp (CRC/P)-associated and actionable incidental findings genes. Those with CRC had a 3.8% rate of positive results (pathogenic or likely pathogenic) for a CRC-associated gene variant, despite generally being older at CRC onset (mean 72 years). Those ascertained for polyps had a 0.8% positive rate and those with no CRC/P had a positive rate of 0.2%. Though incidental finding rates unrelated to colon cancer were similar for all groups, our positive rate for cardiovascular findings exceeds disease prevalence, suggesting that variant interpretation challenges or low penetrance in these genes. The rate of HFE c.845G>A (p.Cys282Tyr) homozygotes in the CRC group reinforces a previously reported, but relatively unexplored, association between hemochromatosis and CRC. These results in a general clinical population suggest that current testing strategies could be improved in order to better detect Mendelian CRC-associated conditions. These data also underscore the need for additional functional and familial evidence to clarify the pathogenicity and penetrance of variants deemed pathogenic or likely pathogenic, particularly among the actionable genes associated with cardiovascular disease.

Objective Autosomal‐dominant familial Alzheimer disease (AD) is caused by by variants in presenilin 1 (PSEN1), presenilin 2 (PSEN2), and amyloid precursor protein (APP). Previously, we reported a rare PSEN2 frameshift variant in an early‐onset AD case (PSEN2 p.K115Efs*11). In this study, we characterize a second family with the same variant and analyze cellular transcripts from both patient fibroblasts and brain lysates. Methods We combined genomic, neuropathological, clinical, and molecular techniques to characterize the PSEN2 K115Efs*11 variant in two families. Results Neuropathological and clinical evaluation confirmed the AD diagnosis in two individuals carrying the PSEN2 K115Efs*11 variant. A truncated transcript from the variant allele is detectable in patient fibroblasts while levels of wild‐type PSEN2 transcript and protein are reduced compared to controls. Functional studies to assess biological consequences of the variant demonstrated that PSEN2 K115Efs*11 fibroblasts secrete less Aβ 1–40 compared to controls, indicating abnormal γ‐secretase activity. Analysis of PSEN2 transcript levels in brain tissue revealed alternatively spliced PSEN2 products in patient brain as well as in sporadic AD and age‐matched control brain. Interpretation These data suggest that PSEN2 K115Efs*11 is a likely pathogenic variant associated with AD. We uncovered novel PSEN2 alternative transcripts in addition to previously reported PSEN2 splice isoforms associated with sporadic AD. In the context of a frameshift, these alternative transcripts return to the canonical reading frame with potential to generate deleterious protein products. Our findings suggest novel potential mechanisms by which PSEN variants may influence AD pathogenesis, highlighting the complexity underlying genetic contribution to disease risk.

We describe two novel missense variants in CACNA1A segregating in a family with variable severity of ataxia/oculomotor dysfunction, neurobehavioral impairments, and epilepsy. The most severe outcome occurred in a compound heterozygous proband, which could represent variable expression of the paternal allele or biallelic modulation of calcium channel function. Acetazolamide and lamotrigine were effective for seizure control.

Background: The hypothesis of the Dilated Cardiomyopathy Precision Medicine Study is that most dilated cardiomyopathy has a genetic basis. The study returns results to probands and, when indicated, to relatives. While both the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology and ClinGen’s MYH7 -cardiomyopathy specifications provide relevant guidance for variant interpretation, further gene- and disease-specific considerations were required for dilated cardiomyopathy. To this end, we tailored the ClinGen MYH7 -cardiomyopathy variant interpretation framework; the specifications implemented for the study are presented here. Methods: Modifications were created and approved by an external Variant Adjudication Oversight Committee. After a pilot using 81 probands, further adjustments were made, resulting in 27 criteria (9 modifications of the ClinGen MYH7 framework and reintroduction of 2 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association of Molecular Pathology criteria that were deemed not applicable by the ClinGen MYH7 working group). Results: These criteria were applied to 2059 variants in a test set of 97 probands. Variants were classified as benign (n=1702), likely benign (n=33), uncertain significance (n=71), likely pathogenic (likely pathogenic; n=12), and pathogenic (P; n=3). Only 2/15 likely pathogenic/P variants were identified in Non-Hispanic African ancestry probands. Conclusions: We tailored the ClinGen MYH7 criteria for our study. Our preliminary data show that 15/97 (15.5%) probands have likely pathogenic/P variants, most of which were identified in probands of Non-Hispanic European ancestry. We anticipate continued evolution of our approach, one that will be informed by new insights on variant interpretation and a greater understanding of the genetic architecture of dilated cardiomyopathy. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03037632

Variants in the LMX1B gene cause nail-patella syndrome, a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by dysplasia of nails, patella and elbow abnormalities, iliac "horns," and glaucoma. We describe an adult man with nephrotic syndrome and no systemic manifestations of nail-patella syndrome at the time of his initial kidney biopsy. His kidney biopsy was initially interpreted as a form of segmental sclerosis with unusual fibrillar deposits. At the time of consideration for kidney transplantation, a family history was notable for end-stage renal disease in 3 generations. Subsequent reanalysis of the initial biopsy showed infiltration of the lamina densa by type III collagen fibrils, and molecular studies identified a pathogenic variant in one allele of LMX1B (a guanine to adenine substitution at nucleoide 737 of the coding sequence [c.737G>A], predicted to result in an arginine to glutamine substitution at amino acid 246 [p.Arg246Gln]). This variant has been described previously in multiple unrelated families who presented with autosomal dominant nephropathy without nail and patellar abnormalities.

Advances in the application of genomic technologies in clinical care have the potential to increase existing healthcare disparities. Studies have consistently shown that only a fraction of eligible patients with a family history of cancer receive recommended cancer genetic counseling and subsequent genetic testing. Care delivery models using pre-test and post-test counseling are not scalable, which contributes to barriers in accessing genetics services. These barriers are even more pronounced for patients in historically underserved populations. We have designed a multimodal intervention to improve subsequent cancer surveillance, by improving the identification of patients at risk for familial cancer syndromes, reducing barriers to genetic counseling/testing, and increasing patient understanding of complex genetic results. We are evaluating this intervention in two large, integrated healthcare systems that serve diverse patient populations (NCT03426878). The primary outcome is the number of diagnostic (hereditary cancer syndrome) findings. We are examining the clinical and personal utility of streamlined pathways to genetic testing using electronic medical record data, surveys, and qualitative interviews. We will assess downstream care utilization of individuals receiving usual clinical care vs. genetic testing through the study. We will evaluate the impacts of a literacy-focused genetic counseling approach versus usual care genetic counseling on care utilization and participant understanding, satisfaction, and family communication. By recruiting participants belonging to historically underserved populations, this study is uniquely positioned to evaluate the potential of a novel genetics care delivery program to reduce care disparities.

Background Genetic testing has multigenerational and familial repercussions. However, the “trickle-down effect” of providing genetic counseling and testing to family members at risk after an initial identification of a pathogenic variant in a medically actionable gene has been poorly understood. Methods Three probands were identified during the pharmacogenetics research phase of eMERGEII (electronic MEdical Record and Genomics, phase II) to have variants in genes associated with autosomal dominant adult-onset disorders determined to be actionable by the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG). Two of the three probands had variants that were classified as pathogenic and the third proband had a variant ultimately classified of uncertain significance, but of concern due to the proband's own phenotype. All probands had additional family members at risk for inheriting the variant. Two of the three probands had family members who received their medical care from the same health care system, Group Health Cooperative (GHC). It was recommended that the proband contact their family members at risk to be referred to genetic counseling for consideration of genetic testing. Results The two probands with pathogenic variants contacted some of their family members at risk. Individuals contacted included children and adult grandchildren, particularly if they received their medical care at GHC. To the best of our knowledge, siblings and more distant relatives at risk were not informed by the proband of their genetic risk. Conclusions Establishing a family network is essential to disseminate knowledge of genetic risk. These three initial cases describe our experience of contacting eMERGE participants with identified variants, providing the probands with appropriate genetic counseling and care coordination, and recommendations for contacting family members at risk. Greater challenges were observed for coordinating genetics care for family members and extending the family network to include other relatives at risk.

Population-based carrier screening is limited to well-studied or high-impact genetic conditions for which the benefits may outweigh the associated harms and costs. As the cost of genome sequencing declines and availability increases, the balance of risks and benefits may change for a much larger number of genetic conditions, including medically actionable additional findings. We designed an RCT to evaluate genomic clinical sequencing for women and partners considering a pregnancy. All results are placed into the medical record for use by healthcare providers. Through quantitative and qualitative measures, including baseline and post result disclosure surveys, post result disclosure interviews, 1–2 year follow-up interviews, and team journaling, we are obtaining data about the clinical and personal utility of genomic carrier screening in this population. Key outcomes include the number of reportable carrier and additional findings, and the comparative cost, utilization, and psychosocial impacts of usual care vs. genomic carrier screening. As the study progresses, we will compare the costs of genome sequencing and usual care as well as the cost of screening, pattern of use of genetic or mental health counseling services, number of outpatient visits, and total healthcare costs. This project includes novel investigation into human reactions and responses from would-be parents who are learning information that could both affect a future pregnancy and their own health.

In this work, we explore the results of germline cancer genetic tests in individuals whose insurance would not cover this testing. We enrolled 31 patients with a personal history of cancer whose health insurer denied coverage for a clinical germline cancer panel genetic test recommended by a medical genetics provider into a study providing exome sequencing and return of cancer-related results. Five participants (16%) had a pathogenic variant identified related to increased cancer risk. Three participants (10%) had a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in a gene related to their cancer history. These rates are not significantly different than the 12% rate of pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants and VUS in 1,462 patients approved by insurance to have a similar clinical germline cancer test (p = .59 for P/LP variants; p = .87 for VUS; Shirts et al., Genet Med, 18:974, 2016). Health insurance guidelines may not meaningfully differentiate between patients with cancer who are likely to benefit from germline cancer genetic testing and those who will not. Failure to identify pathogenic variants in this research cohort would have led to suboptimal care. Strategic evaluation of current germline cancer genetic testing coverage policies is needed to appropriately deliver precision medicine.

Background Clinical exome sequencing (CES) provides the advantage of assessing genetic variation across the human exome compared to a traditional stepwise diagnostic approach or multi-gene panels. Comparative effectiveness research methods offer an approach to better understand the patient-centered and economic outcomes of CES. Purpose To evaluate CES compared to usual care (UC) in the diagnostic work-up of inherited colorectal cancer/polyposis (CRCP) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Methods The primary outcome was clinical sensitivity for the diagnosis of inherited CRCP; secondary outcomes included psychosocial outcomes, family communication, and healthcare resource utilization. Participants were surveyed 2 and 4 weeks after results return and at 3-month intervals up to 1 year. Results Evolving outcome measures and standard of care presented critical challenges. The majority of participants in the UC arm received multi-gene panels [94.73%]. Rates of genetic findings supporting the diagnosis of hereditary CRCP were 7.5% [7/93] vs. 5.4% [5/93] in the CES and UC arms, respectively (P = 0.28). Differences in privacy concerns after receiving CRCP results were identified (0.88 in UC vs 0.38 in CES, P = 0.05); however, healthcare resource utilization, family communication and psychosocial outcomes were similar between the two arms. More participants with positive results (17.7%) intended to change their life insurance 1 month after the first return visit compared to participants returned a variant of uncertain significance (9.1%) or negative result (4.8%) (P = 0.09). Conclusion Our results suggest that CES provides similar clinical benefits to multi-gene panels in the diagnosis of hereditary CRCP.

Advances in sequencing technologies permit the analysis of a larger selection of genes for preconception carrier screening. The study was designed as a sequential carrier screen using genome sequencing to analyze 728 gene-disorder pairs for carrier and medically actionable conditions in 131 women and their partners (n = 71) who were planning a pregnancy. We report here on the clinical laboratory results from this expanded carrier screening program. Variants were filtered and classified using the latest American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guideline; only pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were confirmed by orthologous methods before being reported. Novel missense variants were classified as variants of uncertain significance. We reported 304 variants in 202 participants. Twelve carrier couples (12/71 couples tested) were identified for common conditions; eight were carriers for hereditary hemochromatosis. Although both known and novel variants were reported, 48% of all reported variants were missense. For novel splice-site variants, RNA-splicing assays were performed to aid in classification. We reported ten copy-number variants and five variants in non-coding regions. One novel variant was reported in F8, associated with hemophilia A; prenatal testing showed that the male fetus harbored this variant and the neonate suffered a life-threatening hemorrhage which was anticipated and appropriately managed. Moreover, 3% of participants had variants that were medically actionable. Compared with targeted mutation screening, genome sequencing improves the sensitivity of detecting clinically significant variants. While certain novel variant interpretation remains challenging, the ACMG guidelines are useful to classify variants in a healthy population.

Background— The cause of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is unknown by definition, but its familial subtype is considered to have a genetic component. We hypothesize that most idiopathic DCM, whether familial or nonfamilial, has a genetic basis, in which case a genetics-driven approach to identifying at-risk family members for clinical screening and early intervention could reduce morbidity and mortality. Methods— On the basis of this hypothesis, we have launched the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute- and National Human Genome Research Institute-funded DCM Precision Medicine Study, which aims to enroll 1300 individuals (600 non-Hispanic African ancestry, 600 non-Hispanic European ancestry, and 100 Hispanic) who meet rigorous clinical criteria for idiopathic DCM along with 2600 of their relatives. Enrolled relatives will undergo clinical cardiovascular screening to identify asymptomatic disease, and all individuals with idiopathic DCM will undergo exome sequencing to identify relevant variants in genes previously implicated in DCM. Results will be returned by genetic counselors 12 to 14 months after enrollment. The data obtained will be used to describe the prevalence of familial DCM among idiopathic DCM cases and the genetic architecture of idiopathic DCM in multiple ethnicity–ancestry groups. We will also conduct a randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of Family Heart Talk , an intervention to aid family communication, for improving uptake of preventive screening and surveillance in at-risk first-degree relatives. Conclusions— We anticipate that this study will demonstrate that idiopathic DCM has a genetic basis and guide best practices for a genetics-driven approach to early intervention in at-risk relatives. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03037632.

We hypothesize that new insights into how cancers progress and respond to treatment will come from clinical trials that i) extensively characterize the molecular features of a patient’s cancer; ii) use results to predict drug susceptibilities; iii) treat in accordance with these predictions; and iv) learn from individual patient outcomes to iterate and improve over time. To investigate the feasibility of this type of clinical study, we launched the "Intensive Trial of OMics in Cancer" (ITOMIC) for patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT01957514). Eligible patients have metastatic TNBC, are platinum-naive, and are scheduled to receive Cisplatin. Biopsies are performed under carefully controlled conditions prior to Cisplatin – starting all subjects on a common treatment path, and uncoupling the time needed for specimen analysis from immediate therapy. Biopsies are repeated upon completion of Cisplatin and following subsequent therapies. A subset of specimens is chosen for whole Exome Sequencing, deep sequencing of a panel of cancer associated genes, and RNA-sequencing. De-identified results are placed on a web-based server for analysis and discussed at a meeting of the ITOMIC tumor board. A report describing results and potential therapies is provided to the subject’s oncologist. Treatment decisions are left to the discretion of the oncologist. If a decision is taken to pursue treatments identified in our report we offer assistance in accessing those treatments. Ten patients have been screened and seven have enrolled. Subjects range in age from 40 to 77 years and all but one has received extensive prior treatment for metastatic TNBC. All seven underwent an initial set of biopsies, targeting between two and five metastatic sites. For most metastatic sites, multiple core needle passes are performed. All subjects tolerated the biopsies well without significant adverse events, and all started treatment with Cisplatin. Three subjects completed Cisplatin and underwent a second round of biopsies. Potential targets for therapy were identified in 5 of the first 6 subjects, and three subjects have received four predicted therapies: 1) a patient with somatic loss of BRCA1 and two linked FGFR2 activating mutations, who was treated first with Veliparib through a single-patient IND and then switched to Ponatinib which produced a partial response; 2) a patient with a novel missense ROS1 mutation treated with crizotinib; and 3) a patient with CYP3A4 copy gain treated with cyclophosphamide. Conclusion: Our early experience indicates that this approach is feasible and may increase the efficiency of learning from patients with advanced cancer. Citation Format: C Anthony Blau, Colin Pritchard, Michael O Dorschner, Sibel Blau, Brigham Mecham, Elisabeth Mahen, VK Gadi, Wayne Monsky, Kimberly Burton, Arturo Ramirez, Jackie Stilwell, Eric Kladjian, Carol Collins, Jeannine S McCune, William S Noble, Julie Gralow, Frank Senecal, Linda Dhaene, Nicole Kuderer, Jennifer Specht, Chaozhong Song, Carla Grandori, Nathan Price, Mary Goldman, Aime Radenbaugh, David Haussler, Jingchun Zhu. Assessing the safety and feasibility of efficient hypothesis testing in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-08-01.

By 6 October 2014, many laboratories in the United States must begin honoring new individual data access rights created by recent changes to federal privacy and laboratory regulations. These access rights are more expansive than has been widely understood and pose complex challenges for genomic testing laboratories. This article analyzes regulatory texts and guidances to explore which laboratories are affected. It offers the first published analysis of which parts of the vast trove of data generated during next-generation sequencing will be accessible to patients and research subjects. Persons tested at affected laboratories seemingly will have access, upon request, to uninterpreted gene variant information contained in their stored variant call format, binary alignment/map, and FASTQ files. A defect in the regulations will subject some non-CLIA-regulated research laboratories to these new access requirements unless the Department of Health and Human Services takes swift action to avert this apparently unintended consequence. More broadly, all affected laboratories face a long list of daunting operational, business, compliance, and bioethical issues as they adapt to this change and to the Food and Drug Administration’s recently announced plan to publish draft guidance outlining a new oversight framework for lab-developed tests. Genet Med 16 11, 799–803.

To effectively articulate the results of exome and genome sequencing we refined the structure and content of molecular test reports. To communicate results of a randomized control trial aimed at the evaluation of exome sequencing for clinical medicine, we developed a structured narrative report. With feedback from genetics and non-genetics professionals, we developed separate indication-specific and incidental findings reports. Standard test report elements were supplemented with research study-specific language, which highlighted the limitations of exome sequencing and provided detailed, structured results, and interpretations. The report format we developed to communicate research results can easily be transformed for clinical use by removal of research-specific statements and disclaimers. The development of clinical reports for exome sequencing has shown that accurate and open communication between the clinician and laboratory is ideally an ongoing process to address the increasing complexity of molecular genetic testing.

Despite rapid technical progress and demonstrable effectiveness for some types of diagnosis and therapy, much remains to be learned about clinical genome and exome sequencing (CGES) and its role within the practice of medicine. The Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) consortium includes 18 extramural research projects, one National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) intramural project, and a coordinating center funded by the NHGRI and National Cancer Institute. The consortium is exploring analytic and clinical validity and utility, as well as the ethical, legal, and social implications of sequencing via multidisciplinary approaches; it has thus far recruited 5,577 participants across a spectrum of symptomatic and healthy children and adults by utilizing both germline and cancer sequencing. The CSER consortium is analyzing data and creating publically available procedures and tools related to participant preferences and consent, variant classification, disclosure and management of primary and secondary findings, health outcomes, and integration with electronic health records. Future research directions will refine measures of clinical utility of CGES in both germline and somatic testing, evaluate the use of CGES for screening in healthy individuals, explore the penetrance of pathogenic variants through extensive phenotyping, reduce discordances in public databases of genes and variants, examine social and ethnic disparities in the provision of genomics services, explore regulatory issues, and estimate the value and downstream costs of sequencing. The CSER consortium has established a shared community of research sites by using diverse approaches to pursue the evidence-based development of best practices in genomic medicine.

Evaluating the pathogenicity of a variant is challenging given the plethora of types of genetic evidence that laboratories consider. Deciding how to weigh each type of evidence is difficult, and standards have been needed. In 2015, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) published guidelines for the assessment of variants in genes associated with Mendelian diseases. Nine molecular diagnostic laboratories involved in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) consortium piloted these guidelines on 99 variants spanning all categories (pathogenic, likely pathogenic, uncertain significance, likely benign, and benign). Nine variants were distributed to all laboratories, and the remaining 90 were evaluated by three laboratories. The laboratories classified each variant by using both the laboratory's own method and the ACMG-AMP criteria. The agreement between the two methods used within laboratories was high (K-alpha = 0.91) with 79% concordance. However, there was only 34% concordance for either classification system across laboratories. After consensus discussions and detailed review of the ACMG-AMP criteria, concordance increased to 71%. Causes of initial discordance in ACMG-AMP classifications were identified, and recommendations on clarification and increased specification of the ACMG-AMP criteria were made. In summary, although an initial pilot of the ACMG-AMP guidelines did not lead to increased concordance in variant interpretation, comparing variant interpretations to identify differences and having a common framework to facilitate resolution of those differences were beneficial for improving agreement, allowing iterative movement toward increased reporting consistency for variants in genes associated with monogenic disease.

Mutations in the LRRK2 gene result in autosomal dominant, late onset Parkinson's disease (PD). Three such mutations (p.R1441C, p.R1441G, and p.R1441H) are known to occur within codon 1441, and haplotype analyses indicate that each one has arisen independently on multiple occasions. We sequenced the entire coding region of 18 casual genes for PD or other parkinsonian neurodegenerative disorders in the proband of a family with autosomal dominant PD. We discovered a new missense mutation in the LRRK2 gene, c.4321C>A (p.R1441S). The mutation was predicted to be highly deleterious in silico (Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion score of 25.5) and segregated with disease in the pedigree. The clinical characteristics of affected family members were similar to those described in PD families with other mutations in LRRK2 codon 1441 and included resting tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, unilateral onset, and a good response to levodopa. Age at onset ranged from 41 to 76. Two of the affected members of the pedigree underwent detailed, longitudinal neuropsychological testing, and both displayed evidence of mild cognitive deficits at or slightly preceding the onset of motor symptoms. LRRK2 p.R1441S represents the fourth pathogenic mutation observed within codon 1441 and its discovery adds to the remarkable complexity of a mutational hotspot within the ROC domain of the LRRK2 protein. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Accelerating cancer research is expected to require new types of clinical trials. This report describes the Intensive Trial of OMics in Cancer (ITOMIC) and a participant with triple-negative breast cancer metastatic to bone, who had markedly elevated circulating tumor cells (CTCs) that were monitored 48 times over 9 months. A total of 32 researchers from 14 institutions were engaged in the patient's evaluation; 20 researchers had no prior involvement in patient care and 18 were recruited specifically for this patient. Whole-exome sequencing of 3 bone marrow samples demonstrated a novel ROS1 variant that was estimated to be present in most or all tumor cells. After an initial response to cisplatin, a hypothesis of crizotinib sensitivity was disproven. Leukapheresis followed by partial CTC enrichment allowed for the development of a differential high-throughput drug screen and demonstrated sensitivity to investigational BH3-mimetic inhibitors of BCL-2 that could not be tested in the patient because requests to the pharmaceutical sponsors were denied. The number and size of CTC clusters correlated with clinical status and eventually death. Focusing the expertise of a distributed network of investigators on an intensively monitored patient with cancer can generate high-resolution views of the natural history of cancer and suggest new opportunities for therapy. Optimization requires access to investigational drugs.

Dobyns, William/0000-0002-7681-2844; VERLOES, Alain/0000-0003-4819-0264 WOS: 000273581000002 PubMed: 19574260 Objective To identify genetic causes of COACH syndrome Background COACH syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterised by Cerebellar vermis hypoplasia, Oligophrenia (developmental delay/mental retardation), Ataxia, Coloboma, and Hepatic fibrosis. The vermis hypoplasia falls in a spectrum of mid-hindbrain malformation called the molar tooth sign (MTS), making COACH a Joubert syndrome related disorder (JSRD). Methods In a cohort of 251 families with JSRD, 26 subjects in 23 families met criteria for COACH syndrome, defined as JSRD plus clinically apparent liver disease. Diagnostic criteria for JSRD were clinical findings (intellectual impairment, hypotonia, ataxia) plus supportive brain imaging findings (MTS or cerebellar vermis hypoplasia). MKS3/TMEM67 was sequenced in all subjects for whom DNA was available. In COACH subjects without MKS3 mutations, CC2D2A, RPGRIP1L and CEP290 were also sequenced. Results 19/23 families (83%) with COACH syndrome carried MKS3 mutations, compared to 2/209 (1%) with JSRD but no liver disease. Two other families with COACH carried CC2D2A mutations, one family carried RPGRIP1L mutations, and one lacked mutations in MKS3, CC2D2A, RPGRIP1L and CEP290. Liver biopsies from three subjects, each with mutations in one of the three genes, revealed changes within the congenital hepatic fibrosis/ductal plate malformation spectrum. In JSRD with and without liver disease, MKS3 mutations account for 21/232 families (9%). Conclusions Mutations in MKS3 are responsible for the majority of COACH syndrome, with minor contributions from CC2D2A and RPGRIP1L; therefore, MKS3 should be the first gene tested in patients with JSRD plus liver disease and/or coloboma, followed by CC2D2A and RPGRIP1L. US National Institutes of HealthUnited States Department of Health & Human ServicesNational Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA [K23NS45832, K24HD46712, NCRR 5KL2RR025015, R01NS050375]; March of Dimes Endowment for Healthier BabiesMarch of Dimes; Ames Endowment Fund; Allan and Phyllis Treuer Endowed Chair This work was supported by the US National Institutes of Health (grants K23NS45832 to MAP, K24HD46712 to IAG, NCRR 5KL2RR025015 to DD, R01NS050375 to WBD), the March of Dimes Endowment for Healthier Babies (DD, MAP, and IAG), the Ames Endowment Fund at Seattle Children's Hospital (IAG), and the Allan and Phyllis Treuer Endowed Chair (PFC) at Seattle Children's Hospital.

Electronic health records (EHRs) and their associated decision support tools are potentially important means of disseminating a patient’s pharmacogenomic profile to his or her health-care providers. We sought to create a proof-of-concept decision support alert system generated from pharmacogenomic incidental findings from exome sequencing. A pipeline for alerts from exome sequencing tests was created for patients in the New EXome Technology in (NEXT) Medicine study at the University of Washington. Decision support rules using discrete, machine-readable incidental finding results were programmed into a commercial EHR rules engine. An evaluation plan to monitor the alerts in real medical interactions was established. Alerts were created for 48 actionable pharmacogenomic variants in 11 genes and were launched on 24 September 2014 for University of Washington inpatient care. Of the 94 participants enrolled in the NEXT Medicine study, 49 had one or more pharmacogenomic variants identified for return. Reflections on the process reveal that while incidental findings can be used to generate decision support alerts, substantial resources are required to ensure that each alert is consistent with rapidly evolving pharmacogenomic literature and is customized to fit in the clinical workflow unique to each incidental finding. Genet Med 17 11, 939–942.

The ability to characterize molecular features of cancer from liquid biopsies is resulting in the development of innovative health care for patients. Longitudinal changes in the mutational profiles of DNA isolated from liquid biopsies are being used to better understand and monitor the development, progression, and evolution of therapy resistance in cancer patients. To define changes in the mutational landscape and predict drug susceptibilities in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) patients, we used whole exome analysis to profile circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from eight selected time points of a patient enrolled in the Intensive Trial of OMics in Cancer clinical Trial (ITOMIC-001). The patient initially received weekly cisplatin infusions followed by additional targeted therapy. Peripheral blood samples were collected at specific time points over a period of 272 days following enrollment in the clinical trial. Our data indicates that the identified mutations in genomic DNA isolated from CTCs and ctDNA can be used to understand and mitigate the impact of tumor heterogeneity in addition to identifying clinically relevant mutations at these selected time points. To further increase the resolution of our analysis, we profiled ctDNA from these samples to a higher depth targeting only clinically relevant genes. These analyses increased the sensitivity of detection and identified additional targets that could have been used for therapeutic intervention. In addition to sequence variants, copy number variations (CNVs) have also been significantly associated with the development of metastasis and changes in CNVs have been used to monitor disease progression. We performed a bioinformatics analysis of genomic instability and CNVs across 32 different time points from ctDNA from the same patient throughout the treatment period. The genomic instability number (GIN) calculated for each of the 32 time points seems to mirror the overall CTC burden in the patient at each time point tested. CNV analysis is ongoing and these data sets are being further analyzed in combination with TCGA data to define possible cancer driver genes for the functional prediction of significant TNBC candidate alterations and the results of these analyses will be presented. Citation Format: Kellie Howard, Kimberly Kruse, Brianna Greenwood, Elliott Swanson, Mathias Ehrich, Christopher K. Ellison, Taylor Jensen, Sharon Austin, Arturo Ramirez, Debbie Boles, John Pruitt, Elisabeth Mahen, Jackie L. Stilwell, Eric P. Kaldjian, Michael Dorschner, Sibel Blau, Marcia Eisenberg, Steve Anderson, Anup Madan. Using liquid biopsies and NGS as tools to analyze mutation burden and copy number variation in the blood of a patient with triple negative breast cancer to better inform therapeutic targets [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2757. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2757

Background Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are malignant cells that have migrated from solid cancers into the blood, where they are typically present in rare numbers. There is great interest in using CTCs to monitor response to therapies, to identify clinically actionable biomarkers, and to provide a non-invasive window on the molecular state of a tumor. Here we characterize the performance of the AccuCyte® – CyteFinder® system, a comprehensive, reproducible and highly sensitive platform for collecting, identifying and retrieving individual CTCs from microscopic slides for molecular analysis after automated immunofluorescence staining for epithelial markers. Methods All experiments employed a density-based cell separation apparatus (AccuCyte) to separate nucleated cells from the blood and transfer them to microscopic slides. After staining, the slides were imaged using a digital scanning microscope (CyteFinder). Precisely counted model CTCs (mCTCs) from four cancer cell lines were spiked into whole blood to determine recovery rates. Individual mCTCs were removed from slides using a single-cell retrieval device (CytePicker™) for whole genome amplification and subsequent analysis by PCR and Sanger sequencing, whole exome sequencing, or array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Clinical CTCs were evaluated in blood samples from patients with different cancers in comparison with the CellSearch® system. Results AccuCyte – CyteFinder presented high-resolution images that allowed identification of mCTCs by morphologic and phenotypic features. Spike-in mCTC recoveries were between 90 and 91%. More than 80% of single-digit spike-in mCTCs were identified and even a single cell in 7.5 mL could be found. Analysis of single SKBR3 mCTCs identified presence of a known TP53 mutation by both PCR and whole exome sequencing, and confirmed the reported karyotype of this cell line. Patient sample CTC counts matched or exceeded CellSearch CTC counts in a small feasibility cohort. Conclusion The AccuCyte – CyteFinder system is a comprehensive and sensitive platform for identification and characterization of CTCs that has been applied to the assessment of CTCs in cancer patient samples as well as the isolation of single cells for genomic analysis. It thus enables accurate non-invasive monitoring of CTCs and evolving cancer biology for personalized, molecularly-guided cancer treatment. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1383-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Whole exome and whole genome sequencing are applications of next generation sequencing transforming clinical care, but there is little evidence whether these tests improve patient outcomes or if they are cost effective compared to current standard of care. These gaps in knowledge can be addressed by comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. We designed a randomized controlled trial that incorporates these research methods to evaluate whole exome sequencing compared to usual care in patients being evaluated for hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis syndromes. Approximately 220 patients will be randomized and followed for 12 months after return of genomic findings. Patients will receive findings associated with colorectal cancer in a first return of results visit, and findings not associated with colorectal cancer (incidental findings) during a second return of results visit. The primary outcome is efficacy to detect mutations associated with these syndromes; secondary outcomes include psychosocial impact, cost-effectiveness and comparative costs. The secondary outcomes will be obtained via surveys before and after each return visit. The expected challenges in conducting this randomized controlled trial include the relatively low prevalence of genetic disease, difficult interpretation of some genetic variants, and uncertainty about which incidental findings should be returned to patients. The approaches utilized in this study may help guide other investigators in clinical genomics to identify useful outcome measures and strategies to address comparative effectiveness questions about the clinical implementation of genomic sequencing in clinical care.

Background: The use of next-generation sequencing has significantly advanced personalized medicine for patients (pts) with breast cancer. Despite this technological advancement, there remains the challenge of understanding how and if tumor heterogeneity can confound molecular analysis and treatment decisions. It has been shown that the expression of ER, PR, and HER2 can vary widely within different areas of the same tumor and between matched primary and metastatic lesions. The "Intensive Trial of OMics in Cancer"-001 (ITOMIC-001; NCT01957514) enrolls pts with metastatic TNBC who are platinum-naive and scheduled to receive cisplatin. Multiple biopsies of up to 7 metastatic sites are performed prior to cisplatin and repeated upon completion of cisplatin and following subsequent therapies. A subset of specimens is chosen for DNA sequencing, RNA sequencing, and quantitative proteomics. We explored the discordance of genomic and proteomic alterations for intrapatient and temporal heterogeneity in pts with TNBC, and the potential benefit of panomic analysis to better inform treatment decisions. Methods: Between 7 and 107 tumor samples/biopsy specimens were obtained from each pt from 1-23 different time points. Blood samples were collected for matched tumor-normal genomic analysis. DNA sequencing data were processed using Contraster; RNASeq data confirmed the presence of gene mutations and was used to identify mutational and transcript abundance. PARADIGM was used to determine associations between gene mutations and signaling pathways. Selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry (SRM-MS) was used for proteomics analysis. Results: Almost all pts had loss of TP53 (common in TNBC), and 5 pts had germline BRCA1/2 events, some exhibiting a signature of mutations corresponding to a mismatch repair defect in ≥1 pt. FGFR1/2/3 mutations/amplifications occurred in 5 pts. Three of 12 pts (25%) achieved partial responses after receiving treatments (post cisplatin) based on the molecular profile of their tumor: 1 pt with two FGFR2 activating mutations treated with ponatinib, 1 with a germline BRCA2 mutation treated with veliparib, and 1 with highly expressed Gpnmb treated with an antibody drug conjugate against Gpnmb. Tumor samples showed increased mutational and rearrangement burdens over time but shared mutational characteristics that were unique to each pt. Through the shared alterations across time points for 3 pts, it was possible to reconstruct the clonal history and heterogeneity of the tumors as various therapeutic approaches were attempted. Conclusions: Here we show in TNBC, intrapatient and temporal heterogeneity that may lead to a lack of response to identified targeted therapies. Tumor samples taken over time from the same pt become enriched for more complex genomic structures post therapy but share mutational characteristics, indicating the presence of recurrent tumor populations. This study enabled us to reconstruct the clonal history and heterogeneity of tumors across space (metastatic vs primary at t=0) and time, illustrating the need for comprehensive molecular analysis and combination/multi-targeted therapeutics for optimal treatment in TNBC. Citation Format: Soon-Shiong P, Rabizadeh S, Benz S, Cecchi F, Hembrough T, Mahen E, Burton K, Song C, Senecal F, Schmechel S, Pritchard C, Dorschner M, Blau S, Blau A. Integrating whole exome sequencing data with RNAseq and quantitative proteomics to better inform clinical treatment decisions in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-05-08.

As the practice of genetically profiling patient tumors is considered for making clinical treatment decisions, recent methodologies for screening of genomic aberrations in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free plasma DNA (cfDNA) may provide non-invasive tools for such applications. Genomic analysis of DNA from CTCs and plasma can also provide useful insight into tumor heterogeneity and thus disease progression by revealing sub-populations of tumor cells that evolve during treatment, have novel drug-resistant genotypes, or carry alternate cancer driver mutations not identified by the sequencing of primary tumors. Comprehensive evaluation of DNA isolated from CTCs and cfDNA from a breast cancer patient by whole exome sequencing was performed to better understand the role of liquid biopsies in investigating the etiology of tumor progression. The patient was diagnosed with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) six years after remission from estrogen receptor (ER-3+), progesterone receptor (PR-1+), human epidermal receptor growth factor 2 negative (Her2-), grade 3 intra-ductal carcinoma of the right breast. Metastatic lesions were found in the spine, pelvis and sacrum and bone-marrow. The patient was enrolled in the Intensive Trial of OMics in Cancer clinical Trial (ITOMIC-001; ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01957514) and initially received weekly cisplatin infusions followed by additional targeted therapy. Peripheral blood was obtained during regular clinic visits over the 272 days the patient was enrolled in the clinical trial. CTCs were identified and enumerated from each blood draw using the AccuCyte® -CyteFinder® (AC/CF) system (RareCyte, Seattle WA). Multiple CTCs along with white blood cells (WBCs) were picked from various time points throughout the treatment regimen. The selected CTCs and WBCs were whole genome amplified and whole exome sequencing was performed to identify tumor specific variants. A comparative analysis with variants present in genomic DNA isolated from the bone-marrow metastasis tissue biopsy samples and cfDNA revealed the evolution of tumor-specific variants during therapy. Each CTC had somatic alterations in genes associated with therapies in current use or those in the clinical trials setting. Sequencing analysis of cfDNA provided similar information on potential therapeutic approaches. The monitoring of disease over time through genomic analysis of CTCs and cfDNA can identify novel sub-populations related to disease progression for the tailoring of cancer treatment regimens. Further analysis is being performed to better understand the evolution of the genomic heterogeneity among CTCs at the same time point and across different time points and therefore better understand the etiology of progression of metastatic breast cancer in this patient. Citation Format: Howard K, Austin S, Ramirez AB, Ritter L, Boles D, Pruitt J, Collins H, Mahen E, Leonti A, Maassel L, Subia C, Tuuli S, Heying N, Deutsch K, Cox J, Lo FY, Stilwell JL, Kaldjian EP, Dorschner M, Blau S, Blau A, Eisenberg M, Anderson S, Madan A. Longitudinal analysis of circulating tumor cells and cell free tumor DNA by next generation sequencing in triple negative breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-02-21.