Search

Worldwide there is growing understanding of the importance of interprofessional collaboration in providing well-functioning healthcare. However, little is known about how interprofessional collaboration can be measured between different health-care professionals. In this review, we aim to fill this gap, by identifying and analyzing the existing instruments measuring interprofessional collaboration in healthcare. A scoping review design was applied. A systematic literature search of two electronic databases, Medline (PubMed) and CINAHL, was conducted in 03/2018. The search yielded 1020 studies, of which 35 were selected for the review. The data were analyzed by content analysis. In total, 29 instruments measuring interprofessional collaboration were found. Interprofessional collaboration was measured predominantly between nurses and physicians with different instruments in various health-care settings. Psychometric testing was unsystematic, focusing predominantly on construct and content validity and internal consistency, thus further validation studies with comprehensive testing are suggested. The results of this review can be used to select instruments measuring interprofessional collaboration in practice or research. Future research is needed to strengthen the evidence of reliability and validity of these instruments.

Background There is a growing understanding that empowerment of interprofessional personnel is linked to job satisfaction levels and quality of care, but little is known about empowerment in the context of cancer care. This study describes how interprofessional cancer care personnel perceive their performance and factors that promote work empowerment. Methods This cross-sectional study enrolled 475 (45.2%) of the 1050 employees who work at a regional cancer centre. The participants used two self-administered questionnaires – the Performance of an Empowered Personnel (PEN) questionnaire and Work Empowerment Promoting Factors (WEP) questionnaire – to report perceptions of work empowerment. Both questionnaires’ categories comprise moral principles, personal integrity, expertise, future orientation, and sociality. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics, Versions 24 and 25. Results Overall, the performance of work empowerment was evaluated as being rather high (overall sum score mean: 4.05; range: 3.51–4.41; scale: 1–5). The category that rated highest was moral principles (4.41), and the one rated lowest was the social category (3.51). The factors that promoted work empowerment also ranked high (3.93; range: 3.55–4.08; scale: 1–5), with personal integrity (4.08) the highest and future orientation (3.55) the lowest. Performance and factors that promoted work empowerment correlated positively, moderately, and highly statistically significantly (r = 0.531; p Conclusion The personnel rated their performance and the factors perceived to promote work empowerment rather highly. Personal empowerment can be promoted through teamwork training and supportive management in interprofessional cancer care.

Objective The purpose of this study is to describe the pre-requisites and realisation of interprofessional collaboration as perceived by healthcare professionals working in the cancer care setting and to produce knowledge to support the development of collaborative practices. Methods This study employed a descriptive survey design. The data were collected in one Finnish cancer centre between May and October 2018 from nurses, physicians and other healthcare professionals using an electronic survey (n = 350). The survey focused on the pre-requisites of interprofessional collaboration (appreciation and competence) and its realisation in cancer care. The data were analysed using descriptive and interferential statistics. Results The pre-requisites of interprofessional collaboration were perceived as good and the collaboration was well realised in the cancer centre. The perceptions of pre-requisites and realisation were associated with each other. Male respondents, physicians and professionals belonging to interprofessional teams had more positive perceptions of the pre-requisites and realisation of interprofessional collaboration than others. Conclusion The findings indicate that the pre-requisites of interprofessional collaboration and its realisation seem to be well implemented in the cancer care setting. However, the ongoing evaluation of interprofessional collaboration requires further attention from healthcare administration and professionals to support the systematic development of collaborative practices.

The growing number of women with breast cancer and their unmet knowledge expectations of radiotherapy pose a challenge to develop effective electronic patient education. Development efforts should be focused on e-feedback on knowledge because of its positive effects. In this study, we evaluated how an e-feedback knowledge intervention (e-Re-Know) before first radiotherapy improves breast cancer patients' knowledge of radiotherapy and identified the associations with patients' characteristics. Women with breast cancer (n = 128) were randomized prior to the radiotherapy period either to the intervention group or control group. The outcome measured three months after the radiotherapy period was knowledge level of radiotherapy. The increase in knowledge level was higher in the intervention group after adjustment for baseline knowledge level, and a significantly higher increase in knowledge level was seen in one subdomain, side-effect self-care, compared to the control group. The results of this study indicate that the e-Re-Know can be used in patient education to support empowerment. Future research should target new applications of e-Re-Know available on the Internet for those interested in the subject.

Background The present and future health care is increasingly complex work environment. Cancer care setting has been identified as a challenging work environment in relation to occupational well-being and safety. Work empowerment is associated with job satisfaction, commitment and intention to stay at work. Another determinant is the multiprofessional collaboration in working contexts. It is important to enhance both empowerment of professionals and interprofessional collaboration. Aims of this study is to: recognize a need for work related empowerment (WEP) and interprofessional collaboration (IPC); understand WEP and IPC care; find ways to increase WEP and IPC. Methods Cross-sectional survey, in a network based cancer center in Western Finland. The number of inhabitants in the area is 870 765. The estimated number of health care professionals working with cancer patients in three hospitals is 1050. WEP was evaluated by a validated instrument (Kuokkanen 2003) and IPC with instrument (MONAMI) developed for the study. Sample consists of 350 professionals in cancer care (nurses 66%, physicians 11 %, allied health professionals 13%). Statistical methods were used in analysis. Results Work empowerment was evaluated positively; most critical the respondents were on their activeness on participating to positions of trust, and solving problems in their unit. From the impeding factors of WEP, respondents were most critical on the support by management. Empowerment was highest among physicians. Interprofessional collaboration was evaluated positively; most critical respondents were on the support by the management. Conclusions The results indicate a need for developing organizational and management support for WEP and IPC. On the contrary to other professionals, medical professionals evaluate having good possibilities to lead, manage and make decisions. To decrease the difference between professional groups, enhancement on IPC is needed, that should acknowledge all professionals and aim for shared decision-making in work processes especially in situations not focusing solely on medical issues. Legal entity responsible for the study Turku University of Applied Sciences. Funding The Finnish Work Environment Fund. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This study describes knowledge tests in patient education through a systematic review of the Medline, Cinahl, PsycINFO, and ERIC databases with the guidance of the PRISMA Statement. Forty-nine knowledge tests were identified. The contents were health-problem related, focusing on biophysiological and functional knowledge. The mean number of items was 20, with true-false or multiple-choice scales. Most of the tests were purposely designed for the studies included in the review. The most frequently reported quality assessments of knowledge tests were content validity and internal consistency. The outcome measurements for patient-education needs were comprehensive, validating knowledge tests that cover multidimensional aspects of knowledge. Besides the measurement of the outcomes of patient education, knowledge tests could be used for several purposes in patient education: to guide the content of education as checklists, to monitor the learning process, and as educational tools. There is a need for more efficient content and health problem-specific knowledge-test assessments.

Aims and objectives To evaluate the effect of the Breast Cancer Patient Pathway program on breast cancer patient's empowerment process. Background The results of earlier studies indicate that the use of tailored Internet-based patient education programs increased patient's knowledge level; however, other outcome measures differed. Design This randomised control trial studied the effect of the Internet-based patient educational program on breast cancer patients' empowerment. In this study, we measured the quality of life, anxiety and managing with treatment-related side effects as the outcomes of breast cancer patients' empowering process. Methods Breast cancer patients who were Internet users in one Finnish university hospital during 2008–2010 were randomised to the control group (n = 43) and the intervention group (n = 47). Baseline data were collected first in the hospital and the following data seven times during the treatment process, the last time one year after breast cancer diagnosis. Results There were no statistically significant differences in the quality of life, anxiety or side effects of treatment between the groups. The amount of treatment-related side effects was connected to both physical and psychological well-being. Conclusions In this study, the Breast Cancer Patient Pathway program did not decrease anxiety level or treatment-related side effects among breast cancer patients or improve subscales of quality of life when compared with controls. Relevance to clinical practice There is a need to relieve the side effects caused by patients' care with the help of patient education. Internet-based patient education programs need more focus when developing new patient education methods.

Objective The aim of this systematic review was to analyze what kind of Internet or interactive computer-based patient education programs have been developed and to analyze the effectiveness of these programs in the field of breast cancer patient education. Patient education for breast cancer patients is an important intervention to empower the patient. However, we know very little about the effects and potential of Internet-based patient education in the empowerment of breast cancer patients. Methods Complete databases were searched covering the period from the beginning of each database to November 2008. Studies were included if they concerned patient education for breast cancer patients with Internet or interactive computer programs and were based on randomized controlled, on clinical trials or quasi-experimental studies. Results We identified 14 articles involving 2374 participants. The design was randomized controlled trial in nine papers, in two papers clinical trial and in three quasi-experimental. Seven of the studies were randomized to experimental and control groups, in two papers participants were grouped by ethnic and racial differences and by mode of Internet use and three studies measured the same group pre- and post-tests after using a computer program. The interventions used were described as interactive computer or multimedia programs and use of the Internet. The methodological solutions of the studies varied. The effects of the studies were diverse except for knowledge-related issues. Internet or interactive computer-based patient education programs in the care of breast cancer patients may have positive effect increasing breast cancer knowledge. Conclusion The results suggest a positive relationship between the Internet or computer-based patient education program use and the knowledge level of patients with breast cancer but a diverse relationship between patient's participation and other outcome measures. Practice implications There is need to develop and research more Internet-based patient education.

The purpose of this study is to describe patients' experiences of the quality of care received at a radiotherapy centre. The data were collected using the Good Nursing Care Scale For Patients (GNCS/P), which was modified for this study. Structured questionnaires were handed out in March-May 2004 to 150 adult curative cancer patients attending outpatient radiotherapy at a university hospital in Finland. A total of 135 completed questionnaires were returned. The patients were generally satisfied with the quality of care they received. Among the four quality categories, the highest ratings were given to staff characteristics, and the lowest to the environment. Younger patients, employed patients and those with a higher level of education gave the lowest quality ratings. Improvements are needed primarily in the counselling and education of patients and their relatives. The results of this study provide valuable clues for improving the quality of care in radiotherapy based on patients' expectations.

Objective The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of Breast Cancer Patient Pathway program. Methods In one Finnish university hospital during 2008–10 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients were randomised to the intervention ( n = 50) and the control groups ( n = 48). The breast cancer patient's knowledge expectations and perception of received knowledge, knowledge, the source of information and satisfaction in received patient education were measured. Baseline and one year follow up data collection was conducted. Results No differences were found in knowledge expectations between the groups at baseline. Patients in the control group evaluated their perception of received knowledge to be higher and they were more satisfied with the patient education they received from the hospital staff. However, the Intervention group's knowledge level was higher. The most important source of information was the healthcare professionals in both groups. Conclusion The results of study indicate that when patient education increases, patients’ knowledge expectations increase as well, while their perceptions of received knowledge decrease. Future research is needed to examine the relationship between patients’ knowledge expectations and perception of received knowledge as patients’ knowledge level increases. Practice implications Patient education has to be individually adjusted, taking patients’ expectations into account.

The purpose of this study was to describe what kind of information radiotherapy patients expected to receive through Internet education. Questionnaire data for the longitudinal study were collected from patients at the beginning (stage 1), in the middle (stage 2), and at the end (stage 3) of their radiotherapy period. In stage 1, a total of 150 questionnaires were handed out, and 100 were returned, giving a response rate of 67%. Of the 100 patients, 75 and 73 completed the questionnaires in stages 2 and 3, respectively. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used in data analysis. Knowledge expectations could be classified into four: "I have no expectations," "I don't know what I want," "I want all possible available knowledge," and "I want specific knowledge from different issues." "I want specific knowledge from different issues" were biophysiological, functional, social, experiential, ethical, and financial areas. Patients' information expectations were highest in the biophysiological, functional, and social areas and lowest in the experiential, ethical, and financial areas. Expectations varied during radiotherapy. Characteristics' variables of patients associated with expectations. This study can contribute toward the development of an Internet site based on the knowledge expectations of radiotherapy patients. The results can also be used in individual patient education.