Search

Initial reports suggest an increased thrombotic risk in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We present a case of COVID-19 pneumonia that precipitated chest pain, an acute anterior wall ST-elevation myocardial infarction on the fifth day of hospitalization resulting in large left ventricular apical thrombus.

Opioid use and misuse in the United States has been at epidemic proportions and is predicted to increase further in the setting of the Coronavirus disease 19 pandemic. Acute kidney injury is a condition associated with significant morbidity and increased mortality. We review the literature on the effect of opioids on kidney function and critically examine the association between opioid use and acute kidney injury and identify at-risk populations in whom opioids should be used with caution. We also discuss the role of biomarkers in elucidating this condition and propose preventive measures, novel therapeutic options, and research directions.

Summary: Many US states published crisis standards of care (CSC) guidelines for allocating scarce critical care resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the performance of these guidelines in maximizing their population benefit has not been well tested. In 2,272 adults with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation drawn from the Study of the Treatment and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 (STOP-COVID) multicenter cohort, we test the following three approaches to CSC algorithms: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores grouped into ranges, SOFA score ranges plus comorbidities, and a hypothetical approach using raw SOFA scores not grouped into ranges. We find that area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves for all three algorithms demonstrate only modest discrimination for 28-day mortality. Adding comorbidity scoring modestly improves algorithm performance over SOFA scores alone. The algorithm incorporating comorbidities has modestly worse predictive performance for Black compared to white patients. CSC algorithms should be empirically examined to refine approaches to the allocation of scarce resources during pandemics and to avoid potential exacerbation of racial inequities.

Hypercoagulability may be a key mechanism of death in patients with COVID-19. This cohort study evaluated the incidence of venous thromboembolism and major bleeding in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and examined the observational effect of early therapeutic anticoagulation on survival., Visual Abstract. Early Anticoagulation in COVID-19 Hypercoagulability may be a key mechanism of death in patients with COVID-19. This cohort study evaluated the incidence of venous thromboembolism and major bleeding in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and examined the observational effect of early therapeutic anticoagulation on survival. Visual Abstract. Early Anticoagulation in COVID-19 Hypercoagulability may be a key mechanism of death in patients with COVID-19. This cohort study evaluated the incidence of venous thromboembolism and major bleeding in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and examined the observational effect of early therapeutic anticoagulation on survival., Background: Hypercoagulability may be a key mechanism of death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Objective: To evaluate the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and examine the observational effect of early therapeutic anticoagulation on survival. Design: In a multicenter cohort study of 3239 critically ill adults with COVID-19, the incidence of VTE and major bleeding within 14 days after intensive care unit (ICU) admission was evaluated. A target trial emulation in which patients were categorized according to receipt or no receipt of therapeutic anticoagulation in the first 2 days of ICU admission was done to examine the observational effect of early therapeutic anticoagulation on survival. A Cox model with inverse probability weighting to adjust for confounding was used. Setting: 67 hospitals in the United States. Participants: Adults with COVID-19 admitted to a participating ICU. Measurements: Time to death, censored at hospital discharge, or date of last follow-up. Results: Among the 3239 patients included, the median age was 61 years (interquartile range, 53 to 71 years), and 2088 (64.5%) were men. A total of 204 patients (6.3%) developed VTE, and 90 patients (2.8%) developed a major bleeding event. Independent predictors of VTE were male sex and higher D-dimer level on ICU admission. Among the 2809 patients included in the target trial emulation, 384 (11.9%) received early therapeutic anticoagulation. In the primary analysis, during a median follow-up of 27 days, patients who received early therapeutic anticoagulation had a similar risk for death as those who did not (hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.35]). Limitation: Observational design. Conclusion: Among critically ill adults with COVID-19, early therapeutic anticoagulation did not affect survival in the target trial emulation. Primary Funding Source: None.

Background AKI is a common sequela of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, few studies have focused on AKI treated with RRT (AKI-RRT). Methods We conducted a multicenter cohort study of 3099 critically ill adults with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at 67 hospitals across the United States. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify patient-and hospital-level risk factors for AKI-RRT and to examine risk factors for 28-day mortality among such patients. Results A total of 637 of 3099 patients (20.6%) developed AKI-RRT within 14 days of ICU admission, 350 of whom (54.9%) died within 28 days of ICU admission. Patient-level risk factors for AKI-RRT included CKD, men, non-White race, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, higher body mass index, higher d-dimer, and greater severity of hypoxemia on ICU admission. Predictors of 28-day mortality in patients with AKI-RRT were older age, severe oliguria, and admission to a hospital with fewer ICU beds or one with greater regional density of COVID-19. At the end of a median follow-up of 17 days (range, 1-123 days), 403 of the 637 patients (63.3%) with AKI-RRT had died, 216 (33.9%) were discharged, and 18 (2.8%) remained hospitalized. Of the 216 patients discharged, 73 (33.8%) remained RRT dependent at discharge, and 39 (18.1%) remained RRT dependent 60 days after ICU admission. Conclusions AKI-RRT is common among critically ill patients with COVID-19 and is associated with a hospital mortality rate of >60%. Among those who survive to discharge, one in three still depends on RRT at discharge, and one in six remains RRT dependent 60 days after ICU admission.

Acute kidney injury due to urinary tract obstruction invariably suggests lower urinary tract obstruction or bilateral ureteric obstruction since obstruction of a single kidney while the contralateral kidney is normal and not obstructed would not cause a perceptible rise in creatinine. Assuming a total body volume of 42 L, 70 kg male that generates approximately 1400 mg of creatinine daily (20 mg/kg/day) who has complete urinary tract obstruction would experience a 3.33 mg/dL per day increase in serum creatinine. Thus, for an individual who had prior normal renal function and who presents with a creatinine of 30 mg/dL, one could surmise that the obstructive pathology had lasted at least 10 days. However, the rise in serum creatinine is a poor marker of renal injury and subsequent prognosis. Urinary tract obstruction leading to AKI can be due to a variety of causes, and its management is tailored to the underlying etiology. This case series describes the varied clinical course of four patients at our center who experienced AKI from atypical causes of obstructive uropathy. Current and future diagnostic modalities and caveats in the treatment of this disease entity are also discussed.

Background: We hypothesized that in the very elderly dialysis patients in the United States, institutionalization in nursing homes would increase mortality in addition to age alone. Methods: Incident dialysis patients from 2001 to 2008 above the age of 70 were included. Patients above 70 were categorized into 4 groups according to age as 70-75, 76-80, 81-85, and >85 years and further divided into institutionalized and noninstitutionalized. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to assess patient survival. Results: A total of 349,440 patients were identified above the age of 70 at the time of initiation of dialysis. For institutionalized patients, the mean survival was significantly lower, 1.71 ± 0.03 years for those in the age range 70-75, 1.44 ± 0.02 years for those in the age range 76-80, 1.25 ± 0.02 years for those in the age range 81-85, and 1.04 ± 0.02 for those in the >85 years age group (p = 0.0001). The hazard ratio for mortality in institutionalized elderly patients on dialysis was 1.80 ([95% CI 1.77-1.83]; p = 0.0001). After adjustment for other variables (multivariate Cox regression), to be institutionalized was still an independent risk factor for mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.57 [95% CI 1.54-1.60]; p = 0.0001). Conclusion: There was increased mortality in institutionalized elderly patients as compared to noninstutionalized elderly patients in the same age group. In accordance with the increased frailty and decreased benefits of therapies in the very elderly, especially in those with additional co-morbidities besides age, palliative and end-of-life care should be considered.

Background There are no guidelines for transitioning patients from chronic kidney disease stage 5 to hemodialysis. We conducted this study to determine if there are uniform patterns in how nephrologists transition patients to dialysis. Methods We designed an electronic survey with 39 questions and sent it to a database of practicing nephrologists at the National Kidney Foundation. Factors that were important for transitioning a patient to hemodialysis were evaluated, including medication changes on dialysis initiation, dry weight and dialysis prescription. Results 160 US Nephrologists replied to the survey; 18% (29/160) of the responses were completed via social media sites. Prior to dialysis, 74% (118/160), prescribed furosemide and 67% (107/160) used furosemide with metolazone. Once dialysis started, only 46% (74/160) of the responders continued patients on diuretics daily. Hypertension medications prescribed in dialysis were calcium channel blockers 69% (112/160), beta blockers 36% (58/160), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor 32% (53/160), angiotensin receptor blocker 29% (46/160) and diuretics 25% (42/160). Once dialysis started, 68% (109/160) routinely changed medications. Most, 67% (107/160) ordered patients to avoid anti-hypertensive medications on dialysis days to allow for ultrafiltration. Dry weight was determined in the first week by 29% (46/160) and in the first month by 53% (85/160). Most, 59% (94/160) felt that multiple causes lead to hypertension. Most nephrologists would prescribe small dialyzers and a shorter period of time for the first dialysis session. Conclusion The transition period to chronic hemodialysis has variations in practice patterns and may benefit from further studies to optimize clinical practice. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-018-0943-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

It is important but difficult to distinguish convulsive syncope from epileptic seizure in many patients. We report a case of a man who presented to emergency department after several witnessed seizure-like episodes. He had a previous medical history of systolic heart failure and automated implantable converter defibrillator (AICD) in situ. The differential diagnoses raised were epileptic seizures and convulsive syncope secondary to cardiac arrhythmia. Subsequent AICD interrogation revealed ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation (v-tach/fib). Since convulsive syncope and epileptic seizure share many similar clinical features, early diagnosis is critical for choosing the appropriate management and preventing sudden cardiac death in patients with presumed epileptic seizure.

Universally, the volume of data has increased, with the collection rate doubling every 40 months, since the 1980s. “Big data” is a term that was introduced in the 1990s to include data sets too large to be used with common software. Medicine is a major field predicted to increase the use of big data in 2025. Big data in medicine may be used by commercial, academic, government, and public sectors. It includes biologic, biometric, and electronic health data. Examples of biologic data include biobanks; biometric data may have individual wellness data from devices; electronic health data include the medical record; and other data demographics and images. Big data has also contributed to the changes in the research methodology. Changes in the clinical research paradigm has been fueled by large-scale biological data harvesting (biobanks), which is developed, analyzed, and managed by cheaper computing technology (big data), supported by greater flexibility in study design (real-world data) and the relationships between industry, government regulators, and academics. Cultural changes along with easy access to information via the Internet facilitate ease of participation by more people. Current needs demand quick answers which may be supplied by big data, biobanks, and changes in flexibility in study design. Big data can reveal health patterns, and promises to provide solutions that have previously been out of society’s grasp; however, the murkiness of international laws, questions of data ownership, public ignorance, and privacy and security concerns are slowing down the progress that could otherwise be achieved by the use of big data. The goal of this descriptive review is to create awareness of the ramifications for big data and to encourage readers that this trend is positive and will likely lead to better clinical solutions, but, caution must be exercised to reduce harm.

Evidence suggests a link between opioid use and kidney disease. This review summarizes the known renal manifestations of opioid use including its role in acute and chronic kidney injury. Both the direct and indirect effects of the drug, and the context which leads to the development of renal failure, are explored. While commonly used safely for pain control and anesthesia in those with kidney disease, the concerns with respect to side effects and toxicity of opioids are addressed. This is especially relevant with the worldwide increase in the use of opioids for medical and recreational use.

Based on our review, it appears fair to infer that substantive differences in long-term outcome with PD compared with in-center HD have not been documented. PD may offer a slight advantage in younger, nondiabetic patients in the early phase of renal replacement therapy. Nevertheless, PD is not an advantageous option for that large cohort of the dialysis population in the United States comprised of elderly patients with diabetes.

Staphylococcus lugdunensis can cause virulent infections in immunosuppressed individuals. Here we describe a retrospective analysis of hemodialysis patients with Staphylococcus lugdunensis bacteremia admitted to a New York City hospital from January 2005 to December 2010. Six cases of S. lugdunensis bacteremia were identified. The majority had received antibiotic therapy for at least several weeks. None of them developed endocarditis or other serious complications. Four had their tunneled permanent dialysis catheters changed or removed. This pathogen is rare, but could often fail medical therapy alone and may require surgical intervention. This can be avoided with surveillance and early intervention in patients with high risk for infection. Key wordsStaphylococcus lugdunensis, Staphylococcus, bacteremia, infection, hemodialysis. International Journal of Microbiology Research ISSN: 0975-5276 & E-ISSN:0975-9174, Volume 4, Issue 2, 2012 Introduction S. lugdunensis is coagulase negative staphylococcus described by Fleurette et al in 1989 [1] but has been recently described as an emerging human pathogen [2]. While characterized as coagulase negative, because it does not produce coagulase, there is a membrane bound form of the enzyme in some isolates that can cause it to be misidentified as S. aureus [3]. Although it is considered a skin normal flora, it can cause virulent infections usually in immunosuppressed patients with implanted medical devices including bone replacements and cardiac valve replacements [4]. We report cases of S. lugdunensis bacteremia in hemodialysis patients with permanent tunneled cuffed catheters admitted to a New York City hospital. Methods At least one set of blood cultures were taken from each patient. Blood culture was collected in an adult Bac T/ALERT blood culture set, and upon receipt by the Microbiology laboratory, it was incubated in Bac T/ALERT instrument. Positive blood cultures were then Gram stained and sub cultured on TSA, MacConkey and Chocolate plated media. Next Day Positive cultures on the plate were identified using Walk Away MicroScan panels. Results Patients on hemodialysis who were infected with S. lugdunensis as a cause of bacteremia were identified. As shown in Table 1, all patients were African American and represented both genders equally. The average patient age was 53.8 years and the majority (83%) had hypertension among other co-morbidities. Half of the patients had their catheter placement at the NYC hospitals or its affiliates and 75% of patients had their hemodialysis treatment site elsewhere. The majority of patients were on dialysis for 2 years or less and none of the patients suffered any complications at time of discharge. Antibiotic sensitivities of S. lugdunensis cultured from infected patients are shown in Table 2. Isolates obtained from all patients were sensitive to ceftriaxone, clindamycin, oxacillin, rifampin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxisole and vancomycin and resistant to penicillin. Of those tested, one of six patients was separately resistant to gentamycin and tetracycline. A brief summary of each of the patients infected with S. lugdunensis follows: Citation: Mallappallil M.C., et al. (2012) Staphylococcus lugdunensis bacteremia in hemodialysis patients. International Journal of Microbiology Research, ISSN: 0975-5276 & E-ISSN:0975-9174, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp.-178-181. Copyright: Copyright©2012 Mallappallil M.C., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

The use of synthetic cannabinoids (SCBs) is associated with many severe adverse effects that are not observed with marijuana use. We report a unique case of a patient who developed rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring dialysis after use of SCBs combined with quetiapine. Causes for the different adverse effects profile between SCBs and marijuana are not defined yet. Cases reported in literature with SCBs use have been associated with reversible AKI characterized by acute tubular necrosis and interstitial nephritis. Recent studies have showed the involvement of cytochromes P450s (CYPs) in biotransformation of SCBs. The use of quetiapine which is a substrate of the CYP3A4 and is excreted (73%) as urine metabolites may worsen the side effect profiles of both quetiapine and K2. SCBs use should be included in the differential diagnosis of AKI and serum Creatinine Phosphokinase (CPK) level should be monitored. Further research is needed to identify the mechanism of SCBs nephrotoxicity.

Background: Despite advances in the approach to cure acute kidney injury (AKI), including definition, classification and treatment methods, there are no standard criteria to withdraw dialysis in the setting of improving AKI. We conducted this survey to elucidate parameters that United States (US) nephrologists used to determine when to stop dialysis with improving renal function in AKI. We hypothesized that there would be a difference in approach to weaning a patient off dialysis based on years in practice or the number of cases of AKI treated per year. Methods: This was an anonymous electronic survey of practicing nephrologists who treated AKI. Data was de-identified and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The commonest criteria used to stop dialysis when renal function improved was, in decreasing order of importance, resolution in oliguria (51%), resolution of volume overload (29%), improvement in serum creatinine (26.7%) and resolution of hyperkalemia (21%). The most common reasons for re-starting dialysis within 28 days did not show a specific trend but respondents (20%) reported re-starting if estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) declined. There was no significant pattern in approach to withdrawing dialysis or resuming dialysis based on the number of years in nephrology practice. However, responses of nephrologists who saw more than 20 AKI patients/year were significantly different in stopping dialysis with clinical stabilization of blood pressure (p < 0.001), improvement in respiratory parameters (p = 0.005), improvement in pre-dialysis blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels despite the same dose of dialysis (p = 0.05) and resolution of oliguria (p = 0.025) compared to those who saw fewer cases. Conclusion: Resolution of oliguria was the commonest factor used to help deciding to stop dialysis in improving AKI. However, considerable variation was noted among US nephrologists who participated in this survey, regarding what criteria they used to withdraw dialysis in the setting of improving AKI. These results call for more studies in withdrawing dialysis in the setting of AKI that could lead to guideline formulation.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a very common clinical problem in elderly patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. As life expectancy continues to improve worldwide, there is a rising prevalence of comorbidities and risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes predisposing to a high burden of CKD in this population. The body of knowledge on the approach to elderly patient with CKD is still evolving. Thus, this review seeks to explore the epidemiology and to discuss current understanding of challenges in the diagnosis and management of elderly patients CKD.

Background. Primary goal of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of Renadyl in end-stage renal disease patients was to assess the safety and efficacy of Renadyl measured through improvement in quality of life or reduction in levels of known uremic toxins. Secondary goal was to investigate the effects on several biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress.Methods. Two 2-month treatment periods separated by 2-month washout and crossover, with physical examinations, venous blood testing, and quality of life questionnaires completed at each visit. Data were analyzed with SAS V9.2.Results. 22 subjects (79%) completed the study. Observed trends were as follows (none reaching statistical significance): decline in WBC count(-0.51×109/L,P=0.057)and reductions in levels of C-reactive protein(-8.61 mg/L,P=0.071)and total indoxyl glucuronide(-0.11 mg%,P=0.058). No statistically significant changes were observed in other uremic toxin levels or measures of QOL.Conclusions. Renadyl appeared to be safe to administer to ESRD patients on hemodialysis. Stability in QOL assessment is an encouraging result for a patient cohort in such advanced stage of kidney disease. Efficacy could not be confirmed definitively, primarily due to small sample size and low statistical power—further studies are warranted.

Contemporary Therapy circa 2009: Peritoneal Dialysis (M C Mallappallil) Hemodialysis (Y Woredekal) Hemofiltration (H Ghali) Home Hemodialysis (B G Delano) Self Care Hemodialysis (S H Bray) Kidney Transplantation (F Tedla) Opting for Death (A Joseph) Projected Therapy circa 2012: Bowel as Kidney (E A Friedman) Xenografted Kidneys (M O Salifu) Wearable Artificial Kidney (WAC) (V Gura).