Search

Background Results from the J-ROCKET AF study revealed that rivaroxaban was non-inferior to warfarin with respect to the principal safety outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. This subgroup analysis evaluated whether non-major clinically relevant bleeding (NMCRB) could be a predictive factor for major bleeding (MB). Other predictive factors for MB were also obtained in both rivaroxaban and warfarin treatment groups. Methods The temporal incidence of MB was compared between the rivaroxaban and warfarin treatment groups. Assessment was made whether MB events were often preceded by NMCRB. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to identify any independent predictive factors for MB in both treatment groups. Results The incidences of MB and NMCRB were 18.04% (138/639 patients) in the rivaroxaban arm, and 16.42% in the warfarin arm (124/639 patients). NMCRB preceded MB in only four patients in each treatment group (rivaroxaban: 4/117 and warfarin: 4/98). Multivariate analysis identified predictive factors for bleeding events: anemia with warfarin treatment and concomitant use of antiplatelet agents with rivaroxaban treatment. Conclusions Results from this subgroup analysis, particularly the fact that there was no repeated or sequential pattern between NMCRB and MB occurrences in both treatment groups, suggests that NMCRB might not be a predictive factor for MB. On the contrary, anemia and concomitant use of antiplatelet therapy were likely predictive factors for bleeding with warfarin and rivaroxaban treatment, respectively.

High-dose calcium channel blocker (CCB) shows strong blood pressure (BP) lowering effect. Currently available of controlled-release (CR) nifedipine 80 mg per day clinical data are limited to monotherapy and short-term or long-term retrospective studies. We report the safety and efficacy results of a 52-week, prospective open-label study, in which Japanese patients with essential hypertension were treated with CR nifedipine [80 mg per day; 40 mg bis in die (BID; twice daily)] in combination with other antihypertensive drugs. The patients with inadequate BP control despite treatment with CR nifedipine (40 mg once daily) in combination with other antihypertensive drugs were enrolled. The primary objective of this study was to assess the long-term safety of CR nifedipine (80 mg per day). Efficacy variables included changes in the mean sitting BP, the target BP achievement rate and the BP response rate. CR nifedipine (80 mg per day) was generally well tolerated, with the most common drug-related treatment-emergent adverse event being tachycardia (6.9% of patients). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in three (4.2%) patients. By week 52, the mean reductions in sitting systolic and diastolic BP were 19.4 and 13.6 mm Hg, respectively. The target BP achievement and BP response rates after 52 weeks of treatment were 32.4 and 63.4%, respectively. Based on these findings, long-term treatment with CR nifedipine at 40 mg BID in combination with antihypertensive drugs was well tolerated and effective in Japanese patients with essential hypertension.

Background: The J-ROCKET AF study found that rivaroxaban was non-inferior to warfarin with respect to the principal safety outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this subgroup analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban and warfarin in relation to patient age. Methods and Results: A total of 39.0% were elderly (aged ≥75 years). In elderly patients, the principal safety outcome occurred at 25.05%/year with rivaroxaban vs. 16.95%/year on warfarin (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–2.16), whereas the primary efficacy endpoint occurred at 2.18%/year vs. 4.25%/year (HR, 0.51; 95% CI: 0.20–1.27), respectively. There were significant interactions in the principal safety outcomes of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin between the elderly and non-elderly groups, but not in the primary efficacy endpoints (P=0.04 and 0.82 for both interactions, respectively). Furthermore, in elderly patients, in the rivaroxaban group there was a trend to increase the principal safety outcome regardless of renal function. In elderly patients with preserved renal function, however, patients on rivaroxaban had a marginally favorable trend in the primary efficacy endpoint incidence rate compared with patients on warfarin. Conclusions: There is a need to carefully consider the risks and benefits of therapy with rivaroxaban in elderly patients with non-valvular AF. (Circ J 2014; 78: 1349–1356)

The global ROCKET AF phase III trial evaluated rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (o.d.) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Based on rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics in Japanese subjects and lower anticoagulation preferences in Japan, particularly in elderly patients, the optimal dose regimen for Japanese AF patients was considered. The aim of this analysis was dose selection for Japanese patients from a pharmacokinetic aspect by comparison of simulated exposure in Japanese patients with those in Caucasian patients. As a result of population pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics analyses, a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order absorption and direct link pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models optimally described the plasma concentration and pharmacodynamic models (Factor Xa activity, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and HepTest), which were also consistent with previous works. Steady-state simulations indicated 15 mg rivaroxaban o.d. doses in Japanese patients with AF would yield exposures comparable to the 20 mg o.d. dose in Caucasian patients with AF. In conclusion, in the context of the lower anticoagulation targets in Japanese practice, the population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling supports 15 mg o.d. as the principal rivaroxaban dose in J-ROCKET AF.

Background: In the Japanese Rivaroxaban Once-daily oral direct factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (J-ROCKET AF) study, rivaroxaban 15mg once daily was given to patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥50ml/min (preserved renal function), and was reduced to 10mg once daily in patients with CrCl 30–49ml/min (moderate renal impairment). The aim of this subanalysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of the adjusted dose of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in a cohort with moderate renal impairment. Methods and Results: Compared with patients with preserved renal function, those with moderate renal impairment (22.2% of all randomized patients) had higher rates of bleeding and stroke events irrespective of study treatment. Among those with moderate renal impairment, the principal safety endpoint occurred at 27.76%/year with rivaroxaban vs. 22.85%/year with warfarin (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78–1.91) and the rate of the primary efficacy endpoint was 2.77%/year vs. 3.34%/year (HR, 0.82; 95% CI: 0.25–2.69), respectively. There were no significant interactions between renal function and study treatment in the principal safety and the primary efficacy endpoints (P=0.628, 0.279 for both interactions, respectively). Conclusions: The safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin were consistent in patients with moderate renal impairment and preserved renal function. (Circ J 2013; 77: 632–638)

SummaryPlasma proteins mediate thrombogenesis, inflammation, endocardial injury and structural remodelling in atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesised that anti-coagulation with rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, would differentially modulate biologically-relevant plasma proteins, compared with warfarin, a multi-coagulation protein antagonist. We performed unbiased liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectroscopy and candidate multiplexed protein immunoassays among Japanese subjects with non-valvular chronic AF who were randomly assigned to treatment with 24 weeks of rivaroxaban (n=93) or warfarin (n=94). Nine metaproteins, including fibulin-1 (p=0.0033), vitronectin (p=0.0010), haemoglobin α(p=0.0012), apolipoproteins C-II (p=0.0017) and H (p=0.0023), complement C5 precursor (p=0.0026), coagulation factor XIIIA (p=0.0026) and XIIIB (p=0.0032) subunits, and 10 candidate proteins, including thrombomodulin (p=0.0004), intercellular adhesion molecule-3 (p=0.0064), interleukin-8 (p=0.0007) and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (p=0.0003), were differentially expressed among patients with and without known clinical risk factors for stroke and bleeding in AF. Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban treatment was associated with a greater increase in thrombomodulin (Δ0.1 vs. 0.3 pg/ml, p=0.0026) and a trend towards a reduction in matrix metalloproteinase-9 (Δ2.2 vs. –4.9 pg/ml, p=0.0757) over 24 weeks. Only modest correlations were observed between protein levels and prothrombin time, factor Xa activity and prothrombinase-induced clotting time. Plasma proteomics can identify distinct functional patterns of protein expression that report on known stroke and bleeding risk phenotypes in an ethnically-homogeneous AF population. The greater upregulation of thrombomodulin among patients randomised to rivaroxaban represents a proof-of-principle that pharmacoproteomics can be employed to discern novel effects of factor Xa inhibition beyond standard pharmacodynamic measures.

Background: In Japan, the standard of care for the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) and/or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) consists of intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) followed by warfarin, which was recently compared with rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, in randomized trials. Aim: To examine the length of hospital stay in patients with PE and/or DVT receiving rivaroxaban compared to Japanese standard therapy in the Japanese (J)-EINSTEIN PE and DVT program. Methods: Open-label, randomized clinical trials that compared 3, 6, or 12 months of rivaroxaban with UFH and warfarin in patients with acute, confirmed symptomatic proximal PE and/or DVT. Decisions regarding hospital admission and/or discharge were left to the clinical judgment of attending physicians. Analyses were conducted in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Results: In the ITT population (N= 97), overall patient characteristics were similar in both treatment arms. The median length of stay in rivaroxaban patients was 10.0 days (interquartile range [IQR] 6.0 to 15.0 days) while it was 15.0 days (IQR 9.0 to 22.0) for patients on standard therapy (p = 0.016). All of the four DVT patients who were not hospitalized for the index event were in the rivaroxaban arm. Conclusions: Our results suggest that treatment with rivaroxaban may significantly reduce the length of hospital stay in patients hospitalized for PE and/or DVT compared with the current standard of care in Japan, thereby reducing the burden on patients and the healthcare system. The limitations of our study include small sample size and the generalizability of the findings to the real-world setting. Further research is warranted to identify PE and/or DVT patients in Japanese clinical practice who may potentially be managed as outpatients.

Effects of voglibose (an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor) and pioglitazone (an insulin sensitizer) on glycemic control and on the function of pancreatic islets were evaluated using Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Five week administration (8-13 weeks of age in GK rats) of voglibose alone (added to the chow at a concentration of 10 ppm), pioglitazone alone (10 mg/kg daily p.o.), or both of the agents together significantly improved fasting plasma glucose levels and those at 120 min in oral glucose tolerance tests. Insulin secretory capacity in response to glucose of the isolated islets, assessed by batch incubation, was significantly improved in the voglibose and in the voglibose plus pioglitazone groups. Eight-week administration (5-13 weeks of age) of voglibose and voglibose plus pioglitazone successfully lowered the fasting levels of plasma glucose and triglyceride. The glucose-responsiveness in insulin release from the islets was also significantly recovered by the therapy. The treatment increased the insulin content of the islets to almost twice that in untreated controls. Thus, treatment by these drugs can not only effectively ameliorate the metabolic derangement of NIDDM in GK rats, but it can also restore the deteriorated islet function, possibly through protection from glucose toxicity.

As we had an opportunity to take blood samples from a totally thyroidectomized patient who had attempted suicide by taking 2,000 microg of Levothyroxine (L-T4), the serum levels of thyroid hormones were sequentially measured to investigate the metabolism of circulating thyroid hormones in an athyreotic human. The serum concentrations of most thyroid hormones reached a peak on the second day, but the serum T3 level showed a peak one day later. The maximum concentrations of T4 (315 microg/l), FT4 (48.8 ng/l) and rT3 (0.80 microg/l) were very high, while the peak T3 level (1.92 microg/l) did not exceed the upper limit of the normal range. The serum T4 and rT3 levels returned to their normal range 13-17 days after the suicide attempt. The TSH level was suppressed rapidly and reached its nadir (0.044 mU/l) on the 6th day. During this period, the T1/2 and MCR of serum T4 were 10.4 days and 0.64 l/day, respectively, which values were almost equivalent to those observed during 15 days after discontinuation of the maintenance L-T4 therapy. In summary, the oral intake of a large amount of L-T4 at one time does not induce a proportional increase in the T3 level in an athyreotic person. The MCR of serum T4 is decreased and the T1/2 of serum T4 is prolonged, probably due to the lack of intrathyroidal deiodination. These findings support the conclusion that the D1 activity in the thyroid is one of the major determinants in the metabolic clearance of serum T4.

The majority of the patients enrolled in the rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation (J-ROCKET AF) trial had hypertension. In this subgroup analysis, we investigated differences in the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban and warfarin in subjects with and without hypertension. The baseline blood pressure (BP) measurements of patients with hypertension in the rivaroxaban and warfarin groups were 130/77 mm Hg and 131/77 mm Hg, respectively, whereas those of patients without hypertension were 123/74 mm Hg and 124/73 mm Hg, respectively. The incidence rates of the principal safety outcomes in the rivaroxaban and warfarin groups were 18.39% per year and 16.81% per year, respectively, among patients with baseline hypertension (hazard ratio (HR): 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84–1.45) and 16.71% per year and 15.00% per year, respectively, among patients without hypertension at baseline (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.66–1.97), indicating no significant interaction (P=0.933). The incidence rates of the primary efficacy endpoints in the rivaroxaban group and the warfarin group were 0.54% per year and 2.24% per year, respectively, in patients without baseline hypertension (HR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.03–2.25), and 1.45% per year and 2.71% per year, respectively, in patients with baseline hypertension (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.25–1.16), indicating no significant interaction (P=0.509). In conclusion, the safety and efficacy profile of rivaroxaban was similar to that of warfarin, independent of baseline hypertensive status.

Background Results from a trial of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in 1280 Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation (J-ROCKET AF) revealed that rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin with respect to the principal safety outcome. In this subanalysis, we investigated the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban and warfarin in relation to patients' CHADS 2 scores. Results The mean CHADS 2 score was 3.25, and the most frequent scores were 3 and 4. No statistically significant interactions were observed between principal safety outcome event rates and CHADS 2 scores with respect to treatment groups ( P value for interaction = .700). Irrespective of stratification into moderate- and high-risk groups based on CHADS 2 scores of 2 and 3 or more, respectively, no differences in principal safety outcome event rates were observed between rivaroxaban- and warfarin-treated patients (moderate-risk group: hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], .58-1.95; high-risk group: HR, 1.11; 95% CI, .86-1.45; P value for interaction = .488). The primary efficacy end point rate in the rivaroxaban-treated group was numerically lower than in the warfarin-treated group, regardless of risk group stratification (moderate-risk group: HR, .46; 95% CI, .09-2.37; high-risk group: HR, .49; 95% CI, .22-1.11; P value for interaction = .935). Conclusion This subanalysis indicated that the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin were similar, regardless of CHADS 2 score.

This study was designed to confirm the appropriateness of the dose setting for a Japanese phase III study of rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), which had been based on model simulation employing phase II study data. The previously developed mixed-effects pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model, which consisted of an oral one-compartment model parameterized in terms of clearance, volume and a first-order absorption rate, was rebuilt and optimized using the data for 597 subjects from the Japanese phase III study, J-ROCKET AF. A mixed-effects modeling technique in NONMEM was used to quantify both unexplained inter-individual variability and inter-occasion variability, which are random effect parameters. The final PK and PK-PD models were evaluated to identify influential covariates. The empirical Bayes estimates of AUC and C(max) from the final PK model were consistent with the simulated results from the Japanese phase II study. There was no clear relationship between individual estimated exposures and safety-related events, and the estimated exposure levels were consistent with the global phase III data. Therefore, it was concluded that the dose selected for the phase III study with Japanese NVAF patients by means of model simulation employing phase II study data had been appropriate from the PK-PD perspective.

Background The overall analysis of the rivaroxaban versus warfarin in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation (J-ROCKET AF) trial revealed that rivaroxaban was not inferior to warfarin with respect to the primary safety outcome. In addition, there was a strong trend for a reduction in the rate of stroke/systemic embolism with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin. Methods In this subanalysis of the J-ROCKET AF trial, we investigated the consistency of safety and efficacy profile of rivaroxaban versus warfarin among the subgroups of patients with previous stroke, transient ischemic attack, or non–central nervous system systemic embolism (secondary prevention group) and those without (primary prevention group). Results Patients in the secondary prevention group were 63.6% of the overall population of J-ROCKET AF. In the secondary prevention group, the rate of the principal safety outcome (% per year) was 17.02 in rivaroxaban-treated patients and 18.26 in warfarin-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.29), while the rate of the primary efficacy endpoint was 1.66 in rivaroxaban-treated patients and 3.25 in warfarin-treated patients (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.23-1.14). There were no significant interactions in the principal safety and the primary efficacy endpoints of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin between the primary and secondary prevention groups ( P = .090 and .776 for both interactions, respectively). Conclusions The safety and efficacy profile of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was consistent among patients in the primary prevention group and those in the secondary prevention group.

Background: The global ROCKET AF study evaluated once-daily rivaroxaban vs. warfarin for stroke and systemic embolism prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A separate trial, J-ROCKET AF, compared the safety of a Japan-specific rivaroxaban dose with warfarin administered according to Japanese guidelines in Japanese patients with AF. Methods and Results: J-ROCKET AF was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. Patients (n=1,280) with non-valvular AF at increased risk for stroke were randomized to receive 15mg once-daily rivaroxaban or warfarin dose-adjusted according to Japanese guidelines. The primary objective was to determine non-inferiority of rivaroxaban against warfarin for the principal safety outcome of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding, in the on-treatment safety population. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of stroke and systemic embolism. Non-inferiority of rivaroxaban to warfarin was confirmed; the rate of the principal safety outcome was 18.04% per year in rivaroxaban-treated patients and 16.42% per year in warfarin-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.11; 95% confidence interval 0.87–1.42; P

In two patients with lymphocytic adenohypophysitis, images of the pituitary gland were serially observed by MRI. In both cases, the pituitary gland had swollen during the late stage of the first pregnancy. In case 1, MRI findings were representative of lymphocytic adenohypophysitis. After delivery, plasma levels of PRL, ACTH and cortisol decreased markedly. The height of the pituitary gland gradually decreased from 22 mm (14 days after delivery) to 13 mm (73 days) and became rapidly smaller (4.9 mm, 115 days) following administration of massive doses of hydrocortisone for the treatment of acute adrenal insufficiency induced by painless thyroiditis. Six years later, the height was 2.5 mm. Low plasma levels of PRL and cortisol persisted. Diabetes insipidus did not develop. In case 2, MRI revealed a pituitary mass accompanied by a cystic change. Lymphocytic adenohypophysitis was confirmed by histological examination. Because pituitary function tests indicated that ACTH, PRL, GH and TSH were of low levels, hydrocortisone and L-thyroxine were orally administered. No diabetes insipidus was demonstrated. MRI disclosed that the height of the pituitary gland was 23 mm (17 days after delivery) but decreased to 17 and 5.5 mm after 44 and 128 days, respectively. Four years later immediately after the second delivery, it was 1 mm, and the patient was diagnosed as having empty sella. Long-term observation of lymphocytic adenohypophysitis demonstrated that the pituitary gland was markedly atrophied, leading to empty sella. It is believed that some of the classic cases of Sheehan's syndrome associated with empty sella may include lymphocytic adenohypophysitis.