Search

Background Previous studies comparing inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) features between migrant and native patients have shown clinical phenotype differences. To date, no study has focused on IBD immigrants(MP) in Spain. The aim of this study was to explore the features of MP in Spain and to compare age of disease onset, IBD phenotype and therapeutic requirements with native-born IBD patients(NP). Methods This was an observational, multicentric and case-control study of the nationwide ENEIDA registry. We selected all IBD patients who were born outside of Spain and compared with a control cohort of NP. All included patients were diagnosed with IBD before 2015. Results A total of 13,524 patients were included(1864 MP and 11660 NP).The most prevalent ethnic migrant group was Caucasian(771, 41%), followed by Latin American(572, 31%) and Arabian(341,18%), whereas Asian represented only 6%. Table 1 summarizes the demographic and phenotypic features. 71% of MP were diagnosed with IBD in Spain. There was not a gender predisposition to IBD in the overall migrant group, however more female UC MP were detected compared to UC NP(52 % vs 45%, p Conclusion In the largest cohort of migrant IBD patients in Spain, immigrants were younger, had a shorter disease duration and required a higher use of biologics than natives, pointing phenotypic differences in this population and a universal access to the healthcare system all over the country.

Background It has been suggested that biologic therapy may increase the risk of postoperative complications in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but the evidence is scarce. Our aim was to evaluate whether the treatment with anti-TNF agents, ustekinumab or vedolizumab increase the risk of complications after surgery. Methods IBD patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery between 1st January 2009 and 31st December of 2019 were retrospectively selected. Data collection included clinical characteristic of IBD, biochemical parameters and surgical aspects. Postoperative complications (PC) were defined as those occurring within 30 days after surgery. Exposed cohort (EC): Patients who received the last dose of the biologic within 3 months before surgery. Non-exposed cohort (NEC): Patients who did not receive biologic treatment within 3 moths prior to surgery. Predictive factors for PC and for infections were identified by logistic regression analyses. A genetic matching score was performed to balance the clinical characteristics of both groups. Results A total of 1,535 surgeries performed in 37 centres were included: 81% in Crohn’s disease, 18% in ulcerative colitis and 1% in unclassified-IBD patients. A total of 711 surgeries (46.3%) had been exposed to biologics (583 under anti-TNF therapy, 58 under vedolizumab and 69 under ustekinumab) and 824 surgeries (53.7%) the NEC. PC were reported in 38% (n=267) of patients in the exposed cohort and in 34% (n=280) of patients in the non-exposed one (p=0.15), including dehiscence, infection, obstruction, ileus, bleeding, thrombosis, fistula and evisceration. The most frequent complications were infections (48% of all the cases). A 30-day hospital readmission was needed in 7% (n=110) of the patients, and 2% (n=29) required a new surgery with no differences (p>0.05). Multivariate analysis for PC and infections is presented in table 1. The frequencies of PC for each biologic in the univariate analysis are represented in figure 1. No specific treatment was associated to PC or infections in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Preoperative administration of biological therapy does not seem to be a risk factor for overall PC, although it may be for postoperative infections.

Background Patients with colon Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) have a higher risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) than general population. Current guidelines establish endoscopic surveillance recommendations; however, epidemiological studies show poor compliance. The main aim of our study was to analyse adherence to endoscopic surveillance guidelines. Secondary aim was to evaluate the prevalence and time-to advanced lesions or CRC. Methods Retrospective multicentre study of patients with IBD followed-up in the participating centres between 2005 and 2020, who were diagnosed of IBD between 2005 and 2008, with criteria for CRC surveillance. Patients with CRC before IBD diagnosis were excluded. The ECCO 2013–2017 guidelines were used to evaluate adherence. Adenomatous lesions with >25% of villous component, >1cm or with high-grade dysplasia or serrated lesions >1cm or with any degree of dysplasia were considered advanced lesions. Software used for all analysis was R in its 3.6.1 version. Normality was checked with the Shapiro-Wilks test. Mean comparison was carried out using t-Student test while normality assumptions held true, otherwise, Mann-Whitney test. Time-to advanced lesions or CRC event between patients that had adherence to ECCO guidelines versus those who did not was performed through Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank test. P-values below 0.05 were considered significant. Results A total of 1004 (713 Ulcerative Colitis, 252 Crohn’s disease and 39 Indeterminate Colitis; 52% male) patients from 25 centres were recruited with a median age of 36 (26–47) years. 87% of all patients were included in the endoscopic surveillance programme. The main reasons for non-inclusion were the absence of indication by the physician (38%) and the presence of inflammatory activity (37%). Adherence to the first or subsequent surveillance colonoscopies was 45% and 61%, respectively, with a total adherence rate of 32%. Prevalence of advanced lesions or CRC was 4% and 7 cases of CRC were detected. Time-to-detection of these lesions since IBD diagnosis was significantly longer in non-adherent patients (13.4 + 1.3 vs13.04 + 1.7; p Conclusion Adherence to ECCO guidelines for endoscopic surveillance is low in this Southern European population. A higher and earlier detection of advanced lesions or CRC was identified in the adherent group. The results of this study highlight the need to improve compliance with the recommendations to obtain better outcomes.

Background Three anti-TNFs (one intravenous and two subcutaneous) are licensed for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it is not known if the efficacy of a second anti-TNF changes on whether it is intravenous or subcutaneous; this could justify the indication of biological agents with a different mechanism of action in second line. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in UC. Methods Patients from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry treated with consecutively intravenous and subcutaneous anti-TNF, who were naïve to biological agents, were identified. Patients were classified according to the administration route of the first anti-TNF in: IVi (intravenous initially) or SCi (subcutaneous initially). Patients treated for extraintestinal manifestations or pouchitis were excluded. Clinical activity and effectiveness were defined based on Partial Mayo Score (PMS) at baseline, 14 and 52 weeks. Loss of response, dose-escalation and treatment discontinuation were also assessed. Results 372 UC patients were included (270 IVi and 102 SCi). Both cohorts were similar in clinical-epidemiological characteristics, except for a higher proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe clinical activity at the beginning of the first anti-TNF in the IVi group (82% vs. 71%; p = 0.017) and at the beginning of the second anti-TNF (62% vs. 74%; p = 0.04). Clinical response and remission rates at week 14 for the second anti-TNF were 41% and 29% in IVi vs. 47% and 25% in SCi, respectively (p = ns). At week 52, clinical response/remission rates of the second anti-TNF were 37%/32% in IVi vs. 40%/29% in SCi (p = ns). A higher response rate at 14 weeks with the second anti-TNF was detected in the SCi group (40% vs. 68%; p = 0.012) when the reason for withdrawal of the first anti-TNF was secondary loss of response. The cumulative persistence of the second anti-TNF treatment in IVi and SCi were 55% and 54% after 1 year, and 41% and 40% after 2 years, respectively (p = ns). The SCi group had lower rates of dose-escalation with the second anti-TNF than IVi (34% and 29% in SCi vs. 57% and 49% in EVi, at 12 and 24 months, respectively -p = 0.004-). Dose-escalation of the first anti-TNF and moderate-to-severe clinical activity at the beginning of the second anti-TNF were associated with a lower probability of remission with the second anti-TNF in the short- and long-term. Conclusion The efficacy of infliximab after failure/intolerance of a subcutaneous anti-TNF is similar to that of subcutaneous anti-TNFs after infliximab failure/intolerance.