Search

INTRODUCTION We have previously described AUTO1, a CD19 CAR with a fast off-rate CD19 binding domain, designed to reduce CAR-T immune toxicity and improve engraftment. Its clinical activity has been tested in r/r paediatric and adult B-ALL. Cumulatively, this data confirms the intended function of the receptor, with low levels of CRS/ICANS and long-term engraftment of CAR T-cells observed in both patient groups. Recently, CAR-T therapy has been explored in indolent lymphomas such as follicular (FL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), but a high incidence of toxicity including Grade 3-4 ICANS has been reported. We have initiated testing of AUTO1 in the setting of indolent and high-grade B-NHL and CLL (NCT02935257). METHODS Manufacturing: CAR T-cell products were generated using a semi-automated closed process from non-mobilised leukapheresate. Study design: Subjects ≥ 16y underwent lymphodepletion with fludarabine (30mg/m 2 x3) and cyclophosphamide (60mg/kg x1) prior to AUTO1 infusion, with the exception of the DLBCL cohort who additionally received a single dose of pembrolizumab (200mg) on day -1 to potentiate CAR-T expansion. AUTO1 dose varies based on the indication. Split dosing of 230 x10^6 CD19 CAR T-cells at day 0 and day 9 is employed in the CLL cohort. A single dose of 200 x10^6 CD19 CAR T-cells is delivered to patients with B-NHL. Study endpoints include feasibility of manufacture, grade 3-5 toxicity and remission rates at 1 and 3 months. RESULTS As of 17th May 2021, we recruited 13 patients: 7 with FL, 4 with MCL, 1 DLBCL and 1 CLL. Apheresis and product manufacture was successful in all 13 patients and 9 patients were infused: 7 with FL and 2 with MCL. Three patients (1 DLBCL, 1 CLL and 1 MCL) were pending infusion at time of data cut-off and 1 patient (MCL) died due to Covid-19 prior to infusion. Patients treated with AUTO1 had a median age of 56 years (range 39-68y), had received a median of 3 prior lines of treatment (range 2-5) and all patients had stage IV disease at screening. Grade 1 CRS was reported in 4/9 and Grade 2 CRS in 1/9. 1/9 developed MAS which resolved with anakinra/dexamethasone. No ICANS was observed on study. Excellent CAR engraftment was observed and 9/9 patients were in CMR by 18FDG PET-CT post-treatment. At a median of 6.1 months (range 4.0-8.1m), 8/9 patients were disease free at last follow-up. One patient died in CMR at month 5.6 of COVID-19. CONCLUSION AUTO1 has a tolerable safety profile in adult patients with r/r B-NHL despite high disease burden. Early data shows 100% complete remission rates and excellent CAR engraftment/expansion. Additional MCL, CLL and DLBCL patients, updated data and longer follow up will be presented. Disclosures Roddie: Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Hartley: Astra Zeneca: Ended employment in the past 24 months; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Farzaneh: Autolus: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lowdell: Autolus: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Linch: Autolus: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Pule: Autolus: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Peggs: Autolus: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Background: It has been suggested that dietary freedom in functional insulin therapy may be detrimental to glycemic control in type 1 diabetes. This study evaluates the effect of carbohydrate intake on glycemic control and postprandial blood glucose concentrations. Methods: Insulin pump data from 148 adults with type 1 diabetes, trained in functional insulin therapy, using pumps for ≥6 months, with ≥2 weeks of consecutive downloaded data, ≥80% use of a bolus calculator, ≥3 capillary blood glucose tests/day, and a concurrent HbA1C, were analyzed. More detailed periprandial data (pre- and postmeal glucose, carbohydrate intake, insulin bolus) were collected from a subset of 105 downloads (3495 meals). Results: Mean (± SD) age of contributors was 43 ± 13 years, HbA1C 7.84% ± 0.93 (62.19 mmol/mol); daily carbohydrate intake 166 ± 71 g. HbA1C reduced with increased meals/day ( r = –.370, P < .0005) and increased with mean carbohydrate content/meal ( r = .198, P = .043). However, total daily carbohydrate intake had a weak but significant negative association with HbA1C ( r = –.181, P = .027). There was no association between standard deviation of carbohydrate intake and HbA1C ( r = .021, P = .802) or between meal carbohydrate content and postprandial change in blood glucose ( r = –.004, P = .939) for meals with early postprandial (1-3 hours; n = 390) readings. There was a weak positive correlation ( r = .184, P = .008) between meal carbohydrate content and late (4-7 hours; n = 390) postprandial readings. Discussion: With appropriate training, patients using insulin pumps can accommodate a flexible diet with variable carbohydrate intake, without detriment to glycemic control. However, large carbohydrate meals may contribute to poorer outcomes, through impact on late postprandial glycemia.

Background: Pregnant women with type 1 diabetes are a high-risk population who are recommended to strive for optimal glucose control, but neonatal outcomes attributed to maternal hyperglycaemia remain suboptimal. Our aim was to examine the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on maternal glucose control and obstetric and neonatal health outcomes. Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial, we recruited women aged 18-40 years with type 1 diabetes for a minimum of 12 months who were receiving intensive insulin therapy. Participants were pregnant (≤13 weeks and 6 days' gestation) or planning pregnancy from 31 hospitals in Canada, England, Scotland, Spain, Italy, Ireland, and the USA. We ran two trials in parallel for pregnant participants and for participants planning pregnancy. In both trials, participants were randomly assigned to either CGM in addition to capillary glucose monitoring or capillary glucose monitoring alone. Randomisation was stratified by insulin delivery (pump or injections) and baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from randomisation to 34 weeks' gestation in pregnant women and to 24 weeks or conception in women planning pregnancy, and was assessed in all randomised participants with baseline assessments. Secondary outcomes included obstetric and neonatal health outcomes, assessed with all available data without imputation. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01788527. Findings: Between March 25, 2013, and March 22, 2016, we randomly assigned 325 women (215 pregnant, 110 planning pregnancy) to capillary glucose monitoring with CGM (108 pregnant and 53 planning pregnancy) or without (107 pregnant and 57 planning pregnancy). We found a small difference in HbA1c in pregnant women using CGM (mean difference -0·19%; 95% CI -0·34 to -0·03; p=0·0207). Pregnant CGM users spent more time in target (68% vs 61%; p=0·0034) and less time hyperglycaemic (27% vs 32%; p=0·0279) than did pregnant control participants, with comparable severe hypoglycaemia episodes (18 CGM and 21 control) and time spent hypoglycaemic (3% vs 4%; p=0·10). Neonatal health outcomes were significantly improved, with lower incidence of large for gestational age (odds ratio 0·51, 95% CI 0·28 to 0·90; p=0·0210), fewer neonatal intensive care admissions lasting more than 24 h (0·48; 0·26 to 0·86; p=0·0157), fewer incidences of neonatal hypoglycaemia (0·45; 0·22 to 0·89; p=0·0250), and 1-day shorter length of hospital stay (p=0·0091). We found no apparent benefit of CGM in women planning pregnancy. Adverse events occurred in 51 (48%) of CGM participants and 43 (40%) of control participants in the pregnancy trial, and in 12 (27%) of CGM participants and 21 (37%) of control participants in the planning pregnancy trial. Serious adverse events occurred in 13 (6%) participants in the pregnancy trial (eight [7%] CGM, five [5%] control) and in three (3%) participants in the planning pregnancy trial (two [4%] CGM and one [2%] control). The most common adverse events were skin reactions occurring in 49 (48%) of 103 CGM participants and eight (8%) of 104 control participants during pregnancy and in 23 (44%) of 52 CGM participants and five (9%) of 57 control participants in the planning pregnancy trial. The most common serious adverse events were gastrointestinal (nausea and vomiting in four participants during pregnancy and three participants planning pregnancy). Interpretation: Use of CGM during pregnancy in patients with type 1 diabetes is associated with improved neonatal outcomes, which are likely to be attributed to reduced exposure to maternal hyperglycaemia. CGM should be offered to all pregnant women with type 1 diabetes using intensive insulin therapy. This study is the first to indicate potential for improvements in non-glycaemic health outcomes from CGM use. Funding: Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, Canadian Clinical Trials Network, and National Institute for Health Research.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on the frequency of severe hypoglycemia (SH) in patients with established hypoglycemia unawareness. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective audit of 35 patients with type 1 diabetes and problematic hypoglycemia unawareness, despite optimized medical therapy (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion/multiple daily insulin injections), who used CGM for >1 year. RESULTS Over a 1-year follow-up period, the median rates of SH were reduced from 4.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.75–7.25) episodes/patient-year to 0.0 (0.0–1.25) episodes/patient-year (P < 0.001), and the mean (±SD) rates were reduced from 8.1 ± 13 to 0.6 ± 1.2 episodes/year (P = 0.005). HbA1c was reduced from 8.1 ± 1.2% to 7.6 ± 1.0% over the year (P = 0.005). The mean Gold score, measured in 19 patients, did not change: 5.1 ± 1.5 vs. 5.2 ± 1.9 (P = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS In a specialist experienced insulin pump center, in carefully selected patients, CGM reduced SH while improving HbA1c but failed to restore hypoglycemia awareness.