Search

Complex ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) aims to modify the arrhythmogenic substrates to become incapable to perpetuate the arrhythmia. Ablation-associated determinants of atrial tachycardia (AT) rather than AF recurrences are unknown. The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between the type of arrhythmia recurrence and electrophysiological findings during redo procedures. A total number of 384 consecutive patients with persistent AF underwent complex ablation consisting of PV isolation (PVI), biatrial electrogram-guided ablation, and linear ablation with the desired procedural endpoint of AF termination. Electrophysiological findings during redo procedures and its relation to AR type are the subject of this study. Overall, 177 (46%) patients underwent a second procedure. Patients with AT recurrences had significantly more often persistent PVI (47 vs. 25%; P = 0.002). Moreover, a higher number of recovered PVs were associated with AF recurrence (3 PVs recovered, AF = 16.1% vs. AT = 5.2%; P = 0.02; 4 PVs recovered, AF = 18.5% vs. AT = 6.3%; P = 0.01), regardless of the extent of substrate ablation during the first procedure. Durable PV isolation but not the extent of atrial substrate ablation determines the type of arrhythmia recurrence. Thus, the PVs may represent dominant perpetuators (and not only triggers) of persistent AF even in the presence of a significantly modified atrial substrate.

We report 3 cases (mean age 48.3 ± 11.6 years) of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF), in which a triggering premature ventricular complex leading to IVF could not be identified. All patients underwent posterior fascicle transection with empirical linear ablation of the mid-Purkinje potentials identified along the left ventricular interventricular inferior septum, and no ventricular fibrillation recurrence was documented in any of the patients. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.), Graphical abstract

INTRODUCTION The optimal ablation approach for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS Objective was to compare the long-term rates of freedom from AF/AT in patients that underwent STAR mapping guided ablation against outcomes of patients undergoing conventional ablation procedures. Patients undergoing ablation for persistent AF as part of the Stochastic Trajectory Analysis of Ranked signals (STAR) mapping study were included. Outcomes following 'pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus STAR mapping guided ablation (STAR mapping cohort) were compared to patients undergoing PVI alone ablation during the same time period and also a propensity-matched cohort undergoing PVI plus the addition of complex fractionated electrogram (CFAE) and/or linear ablation ("conventional ablation"). Rates of procedural AF termination and freedom from AF/AT during follow-up were compared. Sixty-five patients were included in both the STAR cohort and propensity matched conventional ablation cohort. AF termination rates were significantly higher in the STAR cohort (51/65, 78.5%) than conventional ablation cohort (10/65, 15.4%) and PVI alone ablation cohort (13/50, 26.0%; STAR cohort vs. other 2 cohorts both p

Background The ablation therapy for persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) is still a challenge due to the high recurrence rate. This study was aimed to investigate the value of extensive linear ablation with contact force sensing techniques for PerAF. Methods A total of 214 patients with PerAF were enrolled in five centers. The patients were randomly assigned to Group I (PVI + LA roof line+ LA anterior wall line) and Group II (PVI + LA roof line), mitral valve isthmus lines were added in both groups if the atrial fibrillation (AF) could not be terminated after all approaches above. Results Acute success rate of AF termination during the ablation procedure in Group I was significantly higher than Group II (P = 0.028). Two-years follow-up showed no significant difference in the sinus rhythm maintenance rate between the two groups (63.4% in group I vs. 57.2% in group II, P = 0.218). More patients in Group I recurred as organized atrial tachycardia (AT) and can be precisely mapped during repeat ablation procedures (15 vs. 2, P = 0.001). The Kaplan–Meier estimates of AF/AT-free survival after repeat ablation procedures were 76.2% in Group I and 47.1% in Group II (P = 0.039). Conclusions Extensive linear ablation with contact force monitoring did not improve the long-term outcomes for PerAF patients. Repeat ablation procedure showed a possible higher chance of sinus rhythm restoration during follow-up.

Catheter ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation is not yet clearly defined with respect to endpoints, and different ablative strategies are offered to patients. Presented here is an approach aiming at biatrial debulking in the form of extensive linear ablation, specifically targeting areas of low-voltage complex fractionated electrograms, in addition to pulmonary vein isolation. Its main advantage is that it is not dependent on operator/system variability, since the strategy of isolating the pulmonary veins, superior vena cava and left atrial posterior wall together with achievement of bidirectional block during linear ablation provides objective endpoints that can consistently be reproduced.

INTRODUCTION When performing linear ablation, creating contiguous and transmural lesions are technically challenging due to the difficulty in finding electrical conduction gaps. We hypothesized that high-density mapping could identify the gaps. METHODS AND RESULTS This study included consecutive patients who underwent conduction gap mapping of de novo lesions (41 patients, 55 lines) and previous lesions (25 patients, 34 lines). We analyzed the utility of bipolar and unipolar conduction gap mapping and retrospectively assessed the voltage and morphology of the bipolar electrograms at the gap sites. Bipolar and unipolar propagation maps were classified into three types: the propagation wavefront traveled through the linear ablation lesions (direct leak), the wavefront jumped to an opposite site across the line and returned to the line (jump and return leak), and others (indefinite leak). In the jump and return leak maps, the site where it returned suggested a conduction gap site. Bipolar propagation maps identified 30 (54.5%) conduction gaps and unipolar maps identified 40 (72.7%) gaps at de novo linear ablation lesions (P = .01), and 32 (94.1%) gaps and 33 (97.1%) gaps, respectively, at previous lesions (P = .56). Bipolar voltage mapping did not add any further efficacy in detecting conduction gaps, and the morphology of the electrograms recorded at the gap sites was not related to the types of propagation maps. CONCLUSION Conduction gaps of linear ablation lesions can be visualized by high-density mapping with a high probability. Unipolar propagation, when used with bipolar mapping, may help detect conduction gap sites.

BACKGROUND: Liver cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors with a high incidence and mortality. Hepatitis-liver cirrhosis-liver cancer is known as the trilogy of liver cancer. At present, due to significant development of imaging interventions, they occupy an irreplaceable position in the field of liver cancer treatment, especially ultrasound-guided ablation. Because patients with liver cancer often present with liver cirrhosis, which leads to morphological deformation of the liver, it is difficult to perform a linear ablation of liver cancer in the areas near the phrenic top and within large blood vessels, among others. The present study reports on two cases of liver cancer that have been subjected to curvilinear ablation. After 1 mo, magnetic resonance imaging showed complete ablation, demonstrating that ultrasound-guided curved ablation is feasible and effective in the treatment of liver cancer. CASE SUMMARY: Two patients were treated at the Liver Disease Department of the Xixi Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University of Chinese Medicine in 2019. Because the first liver cancer patient’s tumor was located close to the diaphragm, it was difficult to complete a straight needle ablation procedure in one session. In order to achieve accurate and minimally invasive treatment of this tumor, a curved needle ablation procedure was designed. The second patient presented with a hepatic cyst in front of the tumor. In order not to damage the hepatic cyst, a looper needle ablation technique was used. The procedure was successfully completed in both cases. CONCLUSION: Curved ablation is a new technique that can be used to treat tumors situated in a variety of locations, providing new ideas for interventional techniques. Its operation difficulty is higher and further animal experiments are necessary to improve the operation procedure.

Multi-electrode mapping (MEM) is increasingly applied in ablation of complex atrial arrhythmias. This study aimed to evaluate MEM for analysis and treatment of complex macroreentry atrial tachycardia (MAT).Patients with MAT related to scarring, history of heart surgery or atrial linear ablation were studied. Patients were mapped with conventional activation mapping (CAM) or MEM. After characterizing the mechanism of atrial tachycardia (AT), the ablation was performed.The study consisted of 114 eligible patients, 74 in the CAM and 40 in MEM. Compared with CAM, MEM had a shorter procedure duration (156.7 ± 59.1 ms vs. 127.3 ± 59.3 ms, P = 0.003) and mapping duration (62.6 ± 35.7 ms vs. 30.5 ± 15.3 ms, P 0.001) and more mapping points (1364.9 ± 828.7 points vs. 148.3 ± 79.6 points, P 0.001). There were no significant differences between CAM and MEM in acute ablation success rate, complication, postoperative AADs, and ablation duration. The mean disease-free survival time in CAM versus MEM was 20.8 (95% CI: 17.6-24.1) months versus 26.6 (95% CI: 22.7-30.4) months. The median disease-free survival time in the CAM versus MEM was 20.0 (95% CI: 13.9-26.1) months versus 30.0 (95% CI: 26.7-36.3) months. The AT recurrence risk of MEM was 0.522 times that of CAM (HR 95% CI: 0.282-0.968; P = 0.039).MEM is strongly recommended in ablation of complex MAT.

Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) linear ablation has been established as the treatment for typical atrial flutter. Recently, ablation index (AI) has emerged as a novel marker for estimating ablation lesions. We investigated the relationship between CTI depth and ablation parameters on the procedural results of typical atrial flutter ablation. A total of 107 patients who underwent CTI ablation were retrospectively enrolled in this study. All patients underwent computed tomography before catheter ablation. From the receiver-operating curve, the best cut-off value of CTI depth was p p 420 and > 386, respectively. Among patients with these cut-off values, the first-pass success rate was 89% in the SC and 50% in the DC (p

Aims To evaluate the clinical outcome in patients undergoing repeat procedures for recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation following an index cryoballoon (CB‐A) pulmonary vein isolation ablation on a mid‐term follow‐up of 12 months. Methods In this propensity score‐matched comparison, 50 patients undergoing left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI) with the CB‐A were matched to 50 patients treated with additional linear ablation using radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). Results Meantime to repeat the procedure was 9.74 ± 4.36 months. At 12 months follow‐up freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATas) was achieved in 82% of patients in the LAPWI group and in 62% of patients in the linear ablation group (P = .03). Regression analysis demonstrated that relapses during the blanking period and LA dimensions were independent predictors of ATas recurrences following the repeat procedure. Conclusion LAPWI using CB‐A is associated with a significantly higher freedom from atrial arrhythmias when compared with the RFCA mediated left atrial linear lesions on a mid‐term follow‐up of 12 months in patients with persAF undergoing a redo procedure., LAPWI using CB‐A is associated with a significantly higher freedom from atrial arrhythmias when compared with the RFCA mediated left atrial linear lesions on a mid‐term follow‐up of 12 months in patients with persAF undergoing a redo procedure.

A 51-year-old man, who had a history of open heart surgery for corrected transposition of great arteries, presented with palpitation due to atrial tachycardia. A propagation map using three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping (CARTO3) showed atrial flutter and underwent linear ablation successfully. This case highlights the difficulty of diagnosis before mapping following a complicated cardiac operation and the usefulness of three-dimensional mapping.

A 66-year-old female, whom received a pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVAI) with linear ablation of the carina lines between the superior and inferior PVs of both the right and left PVs for atrial fibrillation (AF), was admitted to receive a radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of symptomatic drug-refractory atrial tachycardia (AT). The EnSiteTM analysis by the AdvisorTM HD Grid catheter during the AT could easily detect that the carina between the right superior and inferior PVs exhibited a low voltage area (< 0.5 mV), in addition to the fact that the electrical activation turned around the right PVs in a figure 8, even though mapping was performed during AT. This AT was steadily terminated, after commencing the radiofrequency energy delivery to the carina of the right PVs.

Summary As the mechanisms underlying persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are still incompletely understood, a ‘gold standard’ strategy for ablation is lacking. The results of catheter ablation, independent of the ablation strategy applied, are disappointing. Hybrid ablation, combining a thoracoscopic epicardial and transvenous endocardial approach, has shown more favourable outcomes. To date, studies comparing both techniques are lacking. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of hybrid versus catheter ablation in patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF. A systematic literature search of studies reporting on catheter and hybrid ablation of persistent or longstanding persistent AF was performed in the PubMed database. All identified articles were screened and checked for eligibility. A meta-analysis was performed on inter-study heterogeneity and pooled correlation between baseline characteristics, primary and secondary outcomes of hybrid and catheter studies. From the 520 articles identified by the search, 34 articles could be included in the analysis. Hybrid ablation resulted in higher freedom of atrial arrhythmias in patients with persistent and longstanding-persistent AF than catheter ablation (70.7% vs 49.9%, P

Aims Mitral isthmus (MI) ablation is challenging. We hoped to close those conduction breakthrough sites (CBS) across the MI by elaborate mapping. Methods and results After the initial linear ablation, elaborately mapping large areas above and below the MI line and inside the coronary sinus (CS) was sequentially performed to identify the CBS. The shortest distance from the CBS to the MI line was measured. The distant CBS (D-CBS) was identified as those CBS >5.0 mm away from the MI line. We prospectively enrolled 177 consecutive patients. Bidirectional conduction blockage across MI was obtained in 50 (28.2%) patients after the initial linear ablation and was achieved in additional 115 (65.0%) patients following elaborate mapping and reinforcement ablation. After initial linear ablation, 272 CBS (2.14 ± 0.99 CBS/person) were identified, and 226 (83.1%) of them were characterized as D-CBS, including 98 sites (36.0%) >10.0 mm and 39 sites (14.3%) >15.0 mm away. Endocardial and epicardial (CS) reinforcement ablation eliminated 119/272 (43.8%) and 58/272 (21.3%) CBS, respectively. Among the 177 eliminated CBS, 138 D-CBS (78.0%, 11.2 ± 5.6 mm) were confirmed in 95 (74.8%) patients. Moreover, CBS along the course of ligament of Marshall was closed by endocardial ablation more frequently than that along the course of great cardiac vein (52.6%% vs. 35.1%, P = 0.004). Eventually, CS ablation was required only in 64 (38.8%) patients. Conclusion Distant CBS, accounted for the majorities of the residual conduction across the MI after initial ablation, could be effectively identified and accurately eliminated by elaborate mapping and ablation around the MI ablation line.

Background: It is established that ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) effectively creates a linear ablation lesion in the mitral isthmus (MI). However, data on the long-term success rates of MI ablation remains limited. Methods and Results: Our cohort consisted of 560 patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent an initial MI ablation. Ablations were performed by only radiofrequency (RF) in 384 patients (RF group) or by RF and EIVOM in 176 patients (EIVOM/RF group). Ethanol of 5 mL was used to perform EIVOM in advance of RF. Following EIVOM, RF pulses were delivered to the lateral MI line. Bidirectional MI block was fully achieved in 353 (first 318, re-do 35) patients of the RF group and 171 (first 128, re-do 43) patients of the EIVOM/RF group (p = 0.09 in the first, 0.10 in the re-do ablation cases). In cases with complete MI line block, recurrent AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) was observed in 130 (37%) patients of the RF group and in 64 (37%) patients of the EIVOM/RF group (log-rank p = 0.12 in the first, 0.30 in the re-do ablation cases). Of the total 194 patients, 112 with drug refractory AF or AT proceeded to the subsequent ablation process. Reconnection of MI block line was observed in 39 (49%) patients in the RF group and 25 (58%) patients in the EIVOM/RF group (p = 0.32). Conclusion: EIVOM effectively ensures MI line block; however, the reconnection rate was similar between the two groups.

BACKGROUND The STAR AF II (Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation 2) was a multicenter, randomized trial which randomized patients to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone, PVI plus complex fractionated electrograms (CFE), or PVI plus linear ablation (roof line and mitral line). The study failed to show any additional benefit of additional substrate ablation (CFE or lines) in addition to PVI. However, complete block of linear ablations or total elimination of CFE was not achieved in all patients in the adjuvant ablation arms and this could explain why these additive ablation strategies did not improve outcome. We sought to determine whether completeness of adjuvant linear or CFE ablation affected the outcome of these additive ablation strategies when combined with PVI. METHODS AND RESULTS In STAR AF II, 549 patients were randomized 1:4:4 to PVI alone, PVI plus lines, and PVI plus CFE. In this substudy, outcomes of patients with complete linear block and without complete linear block in the PVI + lines group and outcomes for patients with all CFE regions successfully ablated and without all of them ablated in the PVI + CFE are analysed. Of the 243 patients in the PVI plus lines group who received both mitral and roof lines, bidirectional block across both lines was achieved in 179 (74%) but was not achieved in 65 (26%). At 18 months follow-up, AF recurrence occurred in 107 of 179 patients (59.8%) with complete block conduction block across lines and in 40 of 64 patients (62.5%) without complete block (p=0.89) (Figure 1). Even after 2 procedures, AF recurred in 51.9% of patients with complete linear block and 46% of patients without complete block (p=0.09). Of the 207 patients in the PVI plus CFE group who actually underwent CFE ablation, 188 (91%) had elimination of all CFE sites while all CFE were not eliminated in 19 (9%). At 18 months follow-up, AF recurrence occurred in 117 of 188 patients (62.2%) with all the CFE ablated and in 11 of 19 patients (57.9%) without all CFE ablated (p=0.47) (Figure 1). After 2 procedures, AF recurrence occurred in 56.7% of patients with all CFE ablated and 68.0% of patients without all CFE ablated (p=0.29). CONCLUSION PVI combined with both linear and CFE ablation did not result in less AF recurrence compared to PVI alone even after more than one procedure regardless of how well empiric linear or CFE ablation is performed.

Objectives To evaluate the feasibility, procedural data, and lesion characteristics of the anterior line (AL) and roofline (RL) ablation by using ablation index (AI)-guided high power (50 W) among patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods Data from 35 consecutive patients with macro-reentrant left atrial tachycardia or substrate at the left atrium anterior wall or roof after previous PVI were collected. Ablation power was set to 50 W, targeting AI 500 for AL and 400 for RL. The first-pass conduction block (FPB) was evaluated. The AL was arbitrarily divided into three (caudal, middle, and cranial) segments to analyze the location of conduction gaps in non-FPB patients. Results A total of 32 AL and 17 RL were deployed and FPB was achieved in 24 (75%) and 14 (82%) of them, respectively. In the non-FPB group, the most frequent gap location along the AL was the middle third. The final block of AL was achieved in 97%, and the block of RL was achieved in 100%. The radiofrequency (RF) ablation time was short (2.9 ± 0.8 min for AL and 46.2 ± 15.6 s for RL). For AL, the female gender was significantly more frequent in FPB than in non-FPB patients (p = .028); patients with non-FPB were associated with significantly longer RF time as compared to patients with FPB (204 ± 47 s vs. 161 ± 41 s; p = .02). No procedural complications occurred. Conclusion AI-guided high-power (50 W) ablation appears to be a feasible, effective, and fast technique for AL and RL ablation.

Background: We aimed to evaluate the effect of Bachmann bundle (BB) impairment on electrical and mechanical function of the left atrium (LA), as well as the long-term clinical impact of such impairment. Design: We measured activation time in the five LA walls in 56 patients with atrial fibrillation. LA reservoir, conduit, and contractile function were also evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups based on ablation strategy: the circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) group and CPVI with anterior wall linear ablation (LAWA) group. Patients in the CPVI+LAWA group were divided into two sub-groups based on ECG differences following ablation: the BB impairment group and intact BB group. LA activation time and function were then compared between the ablation strategy groups and the CPVI+LAWA subgroups. Results: Patients in the CPVI+LAWA group exhibited longer activation times in the anterior and lateral walls of the LA, poorer LA synchrony, and reduced LA contractile and reservoir function when compared with those in the CPVI group. In the BB impairment subgroup, we observed a discrepancy between electrical/mechanical remodeling. Among five walls, activation time was longest in this region. BB impairment was also associated with reduced LA function. Conclusion: Significant changes in LA function and conductibility were observed in patients with anterior wall ablation, especially those with iatrogenic BB impairment.

Biatrial macro-reentrant tachycardia (Bi-MAT) is a relatively uncommon arrhythmia. Sometimes, it can be produced by the left atrial (LA) anterior or septal-anterior linear ablation. However, data concerning the proarrhythmic role of this ablation lesions are lacking. Here, we reported a case of a single-loop Bi-MAT developing after the LA anterior ablation line performed in one patient with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Purpose: We aimed to determine whether biatrial enlargement could predict reablation of atrial fibrillation after first ablation. Methods: 519 consecutive patients with drug resistant atrial fibrillation [paroxysmal AF (PAF) 361, non-PAF 158] who underwent catheter ablation in Capital Medical University Xuanwu hospital between 2009 and 2014 were enrolled. Biatrial enlargement (BAE) was diagnosed according to trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE). Ablation strategies included complete pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in all patients and additional linear ablation across mitral isthmus, left atrium roof, left atrium bottom and tricuspid isthmus, or electrical cardioversion on the cases that AF could not be terminated by PVI. Anti-arrhythmic drugs or cardioversion were used to control the recurred atrial arrhythmia in patients with recurrence of atrial fibrillation after ablation. Reablation was advised when the drugs were resistant or that patient could not tolerate. Risk factors for reablation were analyzed. Results: After 33.11±21.45months, 170 patients recurred atrial arrhythmia, and reablation were applied in 117 patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that that biatrial enlargement (BAE, HR 1.755, 95%CI 1.153-2.670, P=0.009) was an independent predictor for reablation and was associated with reablation (Log rank P=0.007). Conclusion: Biatrial enlargement is an independent risk predictor for the reablation in atrial fibrillation patients after first ablation.

Introduction The optimal ablation approach for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. Methods and Results Objective was to compare the long‐term rates of freedom from AF/AT in patients that underwent STAR mapping guided ablation against outcomes of patients undergoing conventional ablation procedures. Patients undergoing ablation for persistent AF as part of the Stochastic Trajectory Analysis of Ranked signals (STAR) mapping study were included. Outcomes following 'pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus STAR mapping guided ablation (STAR mapping cohort) were compared to patients undergoing PVI alone ablation during the same time period and also a propensity‐matched cohort undergoing PVI plus the addition of complex fractionated electrogram (CFAE) and/or linear ablation (“conventional ablation”). Rates of procedural AF termination and freedom from AF/AT during follow‐up were compared. Sixty‐five patients were included in both the STAR cohort and propensity matched conventional ablation cohort. AF termination rates were significantly higher in the STAR cohort (51/65, 78.5%) than conventional ablation cohort (10/65, 15.4%) and PVI alone ablation cohort (13/50, 26.0%; STAR cohort vs. other 2 cohorts both p

PubMed ID: 29208256 Background: To achieve sinus rhythm, ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) usually requires substrate modification in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). In the present article, we aimed to compare clinical and substrate modification effects of 2 distinct PVI strategies during stepwise ablation in patients with LSPAF: (1) Combined approach: cryoballoon (CB) for PVI and radiofrequency (RF) ablation for substrate modification and (2) RF-only approach: RF ablation for both PVI and substrate modification. Materials and Methods: A total of 34 patients were divided into 2 groups: 19 in the combined group and 15 in the RF group. Left atrial (LA) complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) maps were acquired before and after PVI and compared between groups. The groups were compared for acute atrial fibrillation termination (AFT) rates and long-term arrhythmia-free survival. Results: A significant reduction on total LA CFAE area was observed with PVI in both groups. In the CB group, when pulmonary veins were excluded, the reduction of LA CFAE area was the most significant on the posterior wall of left atrium and which was greater than in the RF group. Although the ratio of AFT was higher in the CB group (44% versus 33%, respectively), single-procedure arrhythmia-free survival at 1 year was comparable between groups (68% in the CB group versus 66% in the RF group). Times of total procedure, fluoroscopy and post-PVI RF were all shorter in the CB group. Conclusions: CB may cause greater substrate modification on the posterior wall and increase AFT rate during LSPAF ablation. © 2017 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation

A bipolar voltage reflects a thick musculature where formation of a transmural lesion may be hard to achieve. The purpose of this study was to explore the association between local bipolar voltage and conduction gap in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent atrial roof or septal linear ablation. This prospective observational study included 42 and 36 consecutive patients with persistent AF who underwent roof or septal linear ablations, respectively. After pulmonary vein isolation, left atrial linear ablations were performed, and conduction gap sites were identified and ablated after first-touch radiofrequency application. Conduction gap(s) after the first-touch roof and septal linear ablation were observed in 13 (32%) and 19 patients (53%), respectively. Roof and septal area voltages were higher in patients with conduction gap(s) than in those without (roof, 1.23 ± 0.77 vs 0.73 ± 0.42 mV, p = 0.010; septal, 0.96 ± 0.43 vs 0.54 ± 0.18 mV, p = 0.001). Trisected regional analyses revealed that the voltage was higher at the region with a conduction gap than at the region without. Complete conduction block across the roof and septal lines was not achieved in 3 (7%) and 6 patients (17%), respectively. Patients in whom a linear conduction block could not be achieved demonstrated higher ablation area voltage than those with a successful conduction block (roof, 1.91 ± 0.74 vs 0.81 ± 0.51 mV, p = 0.001; septal, 1.15 ± 0.56 vs 0.69 ± 0.31 mV, p = 0.006). In conclusion, a high regional bipolar voltage predicts failure to achieve conduction block after left atrial roof or septal linear ablation. In addition, the conduction gap was located at the preserved voltage area.

Aims The ESC EORP EHRA Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Ablation Long-Term registry was designed to assess management and outcomes of AF catheter ablation procedures in Europe. To investigate the current ablation approaches and their outcomes for patients with paroxymal AF (PAF) and non-PAF in Europe. Methods and results Data from index ablations were collected in 27 European countries at 104 centres in a prospective fashion. Pre-procedural, procedural, and 1-year follow-up data were captured on a web-based electronic case record form. Data on the ablation procedure were available for 3446 patients. Of these, 2513 patients and 933 patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or PVI plus (PVIplus) additional ablation, respectively. The ablation strategy was limited to PVI in 81% and 56% of patients in the PAF and non-PAF group, respectively (P Conclusion In patients with PAF and non-PAF, the ablation strategies of PVI and PVIplus led to similar arrhythmia-free survival rates after 1 year. A considerable hospital readmission rate was noted.

Arrhythmia after surgical MAZE procedures is often misinterpreted as recurrence of atrial fibrillation. This case demonstrates recurrent mitral annular flutter as a result of incomplete surgical mitral isthmus ablation. Examination of local electro grams provides an instructive diagnostic demonstration of linear ablation breakthrough.

Atypical atrial flutters with clockwise mitral activation usually originate in the left atrium (LA). However, in patients with prior linear ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), this can be misleading. A 62-year-old female who underwent 3 prior AF ablations, presents for ablation of recurrent

Background We previously reported the benefit of linear ablation from the superior vena cava to the right atrial septum ( SVC ‐L) within a year after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation ( CPVI ) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( AF ). We explored the long‐term effects of SVC ‐L and its potential related mechanisms. Methods and Results Among 2140 consecutive patients with AF ablation, we included 614 patients (73.3% male, aged 57.8±10.7 years, 13.7% with persistent AF ) who did not undergo an extra–pulmonary vein left atrial ablation after propensity score matching; of those, 307 had additional SVC ‐L and 307 had CPVI alone. We evaluated the heart rate variability and computational modeling study to explore mechanisms. Although the procedure time was longer in the SVC ‐L group than the CPVI group ( P P =0.560). During 40.5±24.4 months of follow‐up, the rhythm outcome was significantly better in the SVC ‐L group than the CPVI group (log rank, P P =0.018) and a lower ratio of low/high‐frequency components ( P =0.011) were found with SVC ‐L than CPVI alone. In realistic in silico biatrial modeling, which reflected the electroanatomies of 10 patients, SVC ‐L significantly reduced biatrial dominant frequency compared with CPVI alone ( P AF termination and defragmentation rates ( P =0.033). Conclusions SVC ‐L ablation in addition to CPVI significantly improved the long‐term rhythm outcome over 2 years after AF catheter ablation by mechanisms involving autonomic modulation and AF organization.

Introduction Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and linear ablation with a roof line and bottom line on the left atrial (LA) posterior wall (LAPW) can be achieved with a cryoballoon (CB). This study sought to investigate the long-term durability of these linear lesions. Methods and results Among 290 persistent patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who had undergone linear ablation with a CB on the roof and bottom line of the LAPW in addition to the PVI, we analyzed those patients who underwent a re-do AF ablation. Arrhythmia recurrence was confirmed in 70 (24%) out of 290 patients, and 47 (16%) patients underwent re-do sessions. At the beginning of the re-do ablation, we examined the reconnection sites of the linear lesions on the LAPW and PVI. Maintenance of the conduction block on the LAPW roof and bottom lines was observed in 35 out of 47 patients (74.5%), and 16 out of 35 patients (45.7%), respectively. The length of the roof line was significantly shorter in patients with preservation of the conduction block on the LAPW roof than in those without (36.2 ± 6.5 mm vs 41.6 ± 4.7 mm, P = .02). Conclusion Durable lesions could be obtained after linear ablation with the CB for the LAPW roof line, especially in those with a relatively short LAPW roof line. However, patients requiring touch-up ablation with radiofrequency were included, and that was associated with a potential financial implication.

Objective Creating transmural linear lesions on the beating heart is an important component of minimally invasive surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. Animal studies have shown poor efficacy for surface bipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Clinicians have developed strategies including multiple device applications and vena caval occlusion (VCO) to improve ablation efficacy. These techniques were evaluated in an acute porcine model. Methods In the first experiment, an RFA device was used to perform two 40-second epicardial ablations on the right atrium of six pigs. Ablations were performed with and without VCO. Ultrasonic flow probes were used to verify VCO. In the second experiment, an RFA device was used to perform two 40-second epicardial ablations at six locations on the left and right atria of six pigs. All animals were sacrificed. The hearts were removed and stained with 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride. Sections were examined using digital photography. Results With VCO, 42 (81%) of 52 sections were transmural; without VCO on the RA, only 12 (24%) of 50 sections were transmural (P < 0.01). In thick (>2 mm) tissue, 10 (59%) of 17 VCO sections were transmural compared with only two (8%) of 24 with normal caval blood flow. Compared with a single ablation, multiple device applications improved transmurality on the LA but not the RA (92% vs 71%, P < 0.05). Conclusions In an acute animal model, VCO improved the efficacy of beating-heart RFA on the RA. Multiple device applications improved the efficacy of RFA on the LA.

Background This study aimed to evaluate an approach for an endpoint of non-inducibility using a combined high-dominant frequency (DF) and continuous complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation following circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in a sequential fashion, including linear ablation as compared to PVI alone. Methods and results A total of 84 non-paroxysmal patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were investigated retrospectively. The AF patients were divided into two groups: patients with PVI following a combined high-DF and continuous CFAE ablation with linear ablation (substrate modification group, n = 59) and those with PVI alone (n = 25). DF sites of ≥8 Hz and then continuous CFAE sites defined by fractionation intervals of ≤50 ms were modified after PVI. The ablation endpoint was non-inducibility. Atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) could not be induced in 54 of 59 (92%) patients after a sequential ablation, and in 18 of 25 (64%) with PVI alone. The ATs freedom without antiarrhythmic drugs in the substrate modification group was significantly greater than that in those with PVI alone after 1 procedure during 12 months of follow-up (78.6% vs. 53.8%, log-rank test p = 0.039). Conclusion This sequential approach using a substrate based ablation was associated with a better clinical long-term outcome as compared to PVI alone.

This paper reviews the simulations of catheter ablation in computer models of the atria, from the first attempts to the most recent anatomical models. It describes how postulated substrates of atrial fibrillation can be incorporated into mathematical models, how modelling studies can be designed to test ablation strategies, what their current trade-offs and limitations are, and what clinically relevant lessons can be learnt from these simulations. Drawing a parallel between clinical and modelling studies, six ablation targets are considered: pulmonary vein isolation, linear ablation, ectopic foci, complex fractionated atrial electrogram, rotors and ganglionated plexi. The examples presented for each ablation target illustrate a major advantage of computer models, the ability to identify why a therapy is successful or not in a given atrial fibrillation substrate. The integration of pathophysiological data to create detailed models of arrhythmogenic substrates is expected to solidify the understanding of ablation mechanisms and to provide theoretical arguments supporting substrate-specific ablation strategies.

AimsConducting gaps in lesion sets are a major reason for failure of ablation procedures. Voltage mapping and pace-capture have been proposed for intra-procedural identification of gaps. We aimed to compare gap size measured acutely and chronically post-ablation to macroscopic gap size in a porcine model.Methods and resultsIntercaval linear ablation was performed in eight Göttingen minipigs with a deliberate gap of ∼5 mm left in the ablation line. Gap size was measured by interpolating ablation contact force values between ablation tags and thresholding at a low force cut-off of 5 g. Bipolar voltage mapping and pace-capture mapping along the length of the line were performed immediately, and at 2 months, post-ablation. Animals were euthanized and gap sizes were measured macroscopically. Voltage thresholds to define scar were determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis as P = 0.003, Tukey's multiple comparisons test). Chronically, voltage mapping and pace-capture mapping overestimated macroscopic gap size by 11.9 ± 3.7 and 9.8 ± 3.5 mm, respectively.ConclusionBipolar voltage and pace-capture mapping overestimate the size of chronic gap formation in linear ablation lesions. The most accurate estimation of chronic gap size was achieved by analysis of catheter-myocardium contact force during ablation.

Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) may additionally suffer from a concealed sinus node disease. We sought to determine the incidence, indications and predictors of acute pacemaker [PM] implantation within 1 week after the ablation of persistent AF. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients, who had had an ablation of persistent AF at our center. Between 01/2011 and 08/2016, 1234 patients (mean age 65 ± 10 years, 66.7% male) without prior PM implantation underwent an ablation of persistent AF. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in 1158 (93.8%), the additional ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) in 1109 (89.9%) and linear ablation in 524 (42.5%) patients. Temporary cardiac pacing was necessary in 27 (2.2%) patients. The temporary PM was removed in 15 patients (1.2%) because sinus node recovered after a median of 1.0 (minimum 0.1−maximum 2.0) day. The remaining 12 (1.0%) patients required the implantation of a permanent PM. Another 13 (1.1%) patients required permanent PM implantation without prior temporary pacing. In a multivariable regression model, age [OR 1.07 (1.02–1.12), p = 0.006], sinus pauses prior to ablation [OR 7.97 (2.36–26.88), p = 0.001] and atria with low voltage [OR 2.83 (1.31–6.11), p = 0.008] were identified as significant predictors for acute cardiac pacing. Acute cardiac pacing within 1 week after the ablation of persistent AF was necessary in 40 (3.2%) patients. Age, sinus pauses in history prior to ablation and the existence of low-voltage areas in the atria were identified as relevant risk factors.

Consequences of Left Atrial Anterior Wall Linear Ablation Objective As an alternative to the mitral isthmus line (MIL), the left atrial anterior wall line (LAAWL) is effective for the treatment of perimitral flutter. This study evaluated the electrophysiologic and clinical outcomes of LAAWL versus MIL in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods Two hundred patients with persistent AF were evenly randomized to the LAAWL and MIL groups. After confirming bidirectional block of the line, left atrial appendage (LAA) activation time and LA propagation pattern were assessed during sinus rhythm (SR). Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography (TTE and TEE) were performed at 12 months after ablation in patients who remained in stable SR. Results In the 74 patients with LAAWL conduction block relative to the 79 with MIL conduction block, LA propagation contour was markedly changed with delayed LAA potential (longer P-wave onset-to-LAA potential interval: 151.7 ± 19.5 vs. 67.8 ± 18.3 milliseconds, P < 0.001); TTE peak A velocity was lower and LAA emptying wave was delayed in the LAAWL group compared with the MIL group; spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) detected in the LAAWL group was significantly higher than that in the MIL group (15.8% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.0004). During a mean follow-up period of 31.8 ± 9.4 (22–57) months, there were 5 cases of stroke in the LAAWL group, which was significantly different from the MIL group (5% vs. 0%, P = 0.047). Conclusions Complete linear lesions transecting the anterior LA were associated with a significant change in the SR propagation pattern with late activation of LAA. This might result in an increased risk of long-term thrombo-embolism events.

BACKGROUND A new three-dimensional heart anatomical simulator (3D HAS) has been created combining a physical heart model with an electroanatomic mapping (EAM) system. The aim of this study is to describe the development and the validation process of this device. METHODS We developed the 3D HAS combining a physical heart model with an EAM system. This simulator was then validated by 10 electrophysiologists, subdivided in two groups based on their experience in electrophysiology procedures. The performance of the experts was compared to the one of the novices in achieving three different tasks: fluoroless reconstruction of the right atrium, coronary sinus cannulation, and deployment of a linear ablation lesion in the cavotricuspid isthmus. For each operator, a score was calculated based on objective parameter for each task and for the overall performance. RESULTS The 3D HAS was located in an environment that allowed use of the main features of the EAM system including contact force sensing. No technical issue was encountered during the validation process. The experts' performance was significantly better than the one of the novices both overall (P = 0.009) and in each task (right atrium reconstruction, P = 0.016; coronary sinus cannulation, P = 0.008; ablation lesion, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS The 3D HAS is reliable and allows use of the main features of an EAM system in the right atrium. The ability to discriminate different levels of experience suggests that this simulator is enough realistic and could be useful for electrophysiology training.

Objective: Radiofrequency catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) still has a substantial recurrence rate. This study aims to investigate whether an AF ablation lesion set chosen using in-silico ablation (V-ABL) is clinically feasible and more effective than an empirically chosen ablation lesion set (Em-ABL) in patients with PeAF.Methods: We prospectively included 108 patients with antiarrhythmic drug-resistant PeAF (77.8% men, age 60.8 ± 9.9 years), and randomly assigned them to the V-ABL (n = 53) and Em-ABL (n = 55) groups. Five different in-silico ablation lesion sets [1 pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), 3 linear ablations, and 1 electrogram-guided ablation] were compared using heart-CT integrated AF modeling. We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of V-ABL compared with that of Em-ABL.Results: The pre-procedural computing time for five different ablation strategies was 166 ± 11 min. In the Em-ABL group, the earliest terminating blinded in-silico lesion set matched with the Em-ABL lesion set in 21.8%. V-ABL was not inferior to Em-ABL in terms of procedure time (p = 0.403), ablation time (p = 0.510), and major complication rate (p = 0.900). During 12.6 ± 3.8 months of follow-up, the clinical recurrence rate was 14.0% in the V-ABL group and 18.9% in the Em-ABL group (p = 0.538). In Em-ABL group, clinical recurrence rate was significantly lower after PVI+posterior box+anterior linear ablation, which showed the most frequent termination during in-silico ablation (log-rank p = 0.027).Conclusions: V-ABL was feasible in clinical practice, not inferior to Em-ABL, and predicts the most effective ablation lesion set in patients who underwent PeAF ablation.

In the early 2000s, Haissaguerre developed the “stepwise ablation” for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). In this ablation strategy, three ablation techniques, pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, electrogram-based ablation, and linear ablation, are performed in a stepwise fashion, aiming for the termination of AF. After PV isolation, AF is commonly terminated by ablation of a discrete area displaying specific electrogram characteristics. This suggests that AF is maintained by rapid activity arising from a small area or site. In 80% of patients, atrial tachycardia (AT) subsequently occurs after termination of AF during the ablation procedure. Mapping and ablation of subsequent AT is another step of this ablation strategy. The mechanism of ATs occurring after termination of AF is macro-reentry or focal tachycardia. Patients with AF termination rarely have recurrence of AF, but have recurrence of AT. The clinical outcome of ablation of recurrent AT is better than that of AF. Thus, termination of AF during the index ablation procedure is associated with a higher arrhythmia-free rate after repeat ablation procedures. Recently, mapping techniques to identify areas or sites driving AF have been developed. Such new mapping techniques may reduce the procedural duration and amount of ablation lesions.

Background Although circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) catheter ablation may not be sufficient for long‐standing persistent atrial fibrillation (L‐PeAF), it is not clear which ablation strategy is beneficial in addition to CPVI. We sought to investigate whether additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)‐guided ablation improves clinical outcomes in L‐PeAF patients who exhibit continuous atrial fibrillation (AF) after CPVI and linear ablation (Line). Methods and Results This study enrolled 137 L‐PeAF patients (71.4% male, 61.6±10.9 years old) who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation. We conducted CPVI+Line based on the Dallas lesion set (posterior box+anterior line) after baseline CFAE mapping in all patients. If AF was defragmented (terminated or changed to atrial tachycardia), the procedure was stopped (AF‐Defrag group, n=29). If AF was maintained after CPVI+Line, we mapped the CFAE again and randomly assigned the patient to the CPVI+Line group (n=54) or the additional CFAE ablation group (CPVI+Line+CFAE group, n=54). L‐PeAF was defragmented during CPVI+Line in 21.2% of patients (29/137, AF‐Defrag group). The mean CFAE cycle length was prolonged ( P P P =0.023), but procedure‐related complication rates did not vary. During 22.3±13.2 months of follow‐up, the clinical recurrence rates were 17.2% in the AF‐Defrag group, 18.5% in the CPVI+Line group, and 32.1% in the CPVI+Line+CFAE group (log rank, P =0.166). Conclusions Although CPVI+Line reduces and localizes CFAE area, additional CFAE ablation after CPVI+Line does not improve the clinical outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with L‐PeAF.

Background Analysis of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator electrograms (IEGMs) with pacing along the scar edge is often used to approximate distinct exit sites of scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT). We evaluated the spatial resolution of IEGMs in identifying distinct exit sites of scar-related VT. Methods and Results Seventeen patients with scar-related VT were included. Threshold pacing (500-ms cycle length) was performed at sites spaced 10 mm apart along the scar border, as defined by high-density bipolar voltage mapping. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram and near-field and far-field IEGMs were recorded at each pacing site and assessed for morphology. The average scar size was 60 ± 30 cm2 and the scar border perimeter measured 28 ± 9 cm. A median of 18 pacing sites per patient were collected, spaced 14 ± 11 mm apart. The mean spatial resolution for the near-field, far-field, and combination of both was 82.7 ± 76 mm, 62.7 ± 53.6 mm, and 56.7 ± 50 mm (P for trend < 0.001). In all cases, IEGM analysis failed to identify distinct VT exit sites spaced

Long-Term Follow-Up of Linear Ablation for AF Background The long-term outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients remains controversial due to different procedural strategies. This study aimed to present the clinical outcome of a pure linear ablation approach without circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) over an extended (>5 years) follow-up period. Methods From January 2005 to December 2009, 120 consecutive patients (94 men; age, 53.6 ± 10.3 years) with drug-refractory persistent AF that underwent pure linear ablation using AF termination as the desired procedural endpoint were enrolled. Results In the primary procedure, sinus rhythm was restored by ablation in 75 (62.5%) patients, and the remaining 45 patients in whom AF could not be terminated by ablation received electrical cardioversion. During a median follow-up period of 5.1 (range 3.2–7.5) years, sinus rhythm was maintained in 48 (40.0%) patients without any antiarrhythmic drugs after a single procedure. There was a higher long-term success in the patients in whom AF was terminated by ablation than in those requiring cardioversion (49.3 vs. 24.4%; P = 0.007). Conclusion Linear catheter ablation without CPVI is effective for persistent AF. Patients with AF terminated by ablation were associated with a better long-term outcome than those requiring cardioversion

Background Although a large isolated surface area of the left atrium (LA) may improve the success rate of catheter ablation (CA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), little is known about the relation between clinical outcomes and the amount of atrial mass reduction (AMR: ratio of total isolated and ablated areas to LA surface area) in different ablation strategies for patients with long-standing persistent AF (L-PeAF). Methods We randomly assigned 119 consecutive L-PeAF patients to adjunctive linear ablation ( n =60) or complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)-guided ablation ( n =59) after circumferential antral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Linear lesions included roof and anterior lines with conduction block. LA defragmentation was performed with an automated CFAE-detection algorithm. Cavotricuspid isthmus block was performed in all patients. Creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) and troponin-T levels were measured 1day post-CA. Results CK-MB and troponin-T levels were higher, ablation time was longer, and AMR was greater in the CFAE-guided ablation group than in the linear ablation group. AF termination during CA was more frequently observed in the linear ablation group than in the CFAE-guided ablation group ( P =0.031). Twelve months after a single procedure, recurrence occurred in 16 (26.7%) patients with linear ablation and 27 (45.8%) patients with CFAE-guided ablation ( P =0.023). On multivariate analysis, LA volume and ablation method were the only independent risk factors for arrhythmia recurrence. Conclusion Conduction block through linear lines+PVI was an efficient ablation strategy for L-PeAF, whereas the AMR amount did not influence clinical outcomes.

Background It is not clear whether bidirectional block ( BDB ) of linear ablations reduces atrial fibrillation ( AF ) recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation. We hypothesized that BDB of linear ablation has prognostic significance after radiofrequency catheter ablation for persistent AF . Methods and Results Among 1793 consecutive patients in the Yonsei AF ablation cohort, this observational cohort study included 398 patients with persistent AF (75.6% male; age, 59.8±10.3 years) who underwent catheter ablation with a consistent ablation protocol of the Dallas lesion set: circumferential pulmonary vein isolation; cavotricuspid isthmus ablation ( CTI ); roof line ( RL ); posterior‐inferior line ( PIL ); and anterior line ( AL ). BDB rates of de novo ablation lines were 100% in circumferential pulmonary vein isolation, 100% in CTI , 84.7% in RL , 44.7% in PIL , and 63.6% in AL . During 29.0±18.4 months of follow‐up, 31.7% (126/398) of the patients showed clinical recurrence. Left atrial posterior wall ( LAPW ) isolation ( BDB s of RL and PIL ) was independently associated with lower clinical AF /atrial tachycardia recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47–0.98; P =0.041; log‐rank, P =0.017), whereas BDB s of RL or AL were not (log‐rank, P =0.178 for RL; P =0.764 for AL ). Among 52 patients who underwent repeat procedures (23.0±16.1 months after de novo procedure), the BDB maintenance rates for CTI , RL , PIL , and AL were 94.2% (49 of 52), 63.5% (33 of 47), 62.1% (18 of 29), and 61.8% (21 of 34), respectively. Conclusions Although PIL crosses the esophageal contact area, LAPW isolation is important for better clinical outcome in catheter ablation with a linear ablation strategy for patients with persistent AF.

Background Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is a potentially curative treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), however, whether or not additional left atrial (LA) linear ablation for recurrent AF adversely affects LA remodeling is unknown. Methods Thirty-eight patients experiencing AF recurrence after the 1st circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) underwent a repeat RFCA, including 20 and 18 patients receiving a repeat CPVI (group I) or CPVI plus LA linear ablation (group II), respectively. 2-D echocardiography was performed during sinus rhythm within 24h, at 1-m and 6-m after RFCA. Longitudinal strains and strain rate were measured with speckle-tracking echocardiography. The standard deviation of contraction duration was defined as LA mechanical dispersion. Results One and two patients experienced AF recurrence after the 2nd RFCA in group I and II, respectively (P=NS). The 1st CPVI with AF recurrence did not reduce LA size significantly in two groups. After a repeat CPVI, LA diameter but not LA maximal and minimal volume was significantly reduced in group I; additional LA linear ablation significantly decreased LA diameter, maximal and minimal volume in group II. However, there was no significant difference in LA emptying function, global and segmental LA strain and strain rate among the baseline, 1-m and 6-m follow-up in two groups. RFCA did not significantly increase LA mechanical dispersion regardless of the AF ablation strategies. Conclusions In patients with recurrent AF, a successful repeat CPVI with or without additional LA linear ablation reduced LA size without significant deleterious effects on LA function and mechanical dispersion.