Search

Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease is a major cause of infant morbidity and mortality. This Phase I, randomized, observer-blind, placebo- and active-controlled study evaluated an investigational vaccine against RSV (ChAd155-RSV) using the viral vector chimpanzee-adenovirus-155, encoding RSV fusion (F), nucleocapsid, and transcription antitermination proteins. Methods Healthy 18–45-year-old adults received ChAd155-RSV, a placebo, or an active control (Bexsero) at Days (D) 0 and 30. An escalation from a low dose (5 × 109 viral particles) to a high dose (5 × 1010 viral particles) occurred after the first 16 participants. Endpoints were solicited/unsolicited and serious adverse events (SAEs), biochemical/hematological parameters, cell-mediated immunogenicity by enzyme-linked immunospot, functional neutralizing antibodies, anti RSV-F immunoglobin (Ig) G, and ChAd155 neutralizing antibodies. Results There were 7 participants who received the ChAd155-RSV low dose, 31 who received the ChAd155-RSV high dose, 19 who received the placebo, and 15 who received the active control. No dose-related toxicity or attributable SAEs at the 1-year follow-up were observed. The RSV-A neutralizing antibodies geometric mean titer ratios (post/pre-immunization) following a high dose were 2.6 (D30) and 2.3 (D60). The ratio of the fold-rise (D0 to D30) in anti-F IgG over the fold-rise in RSV-A–neutralizing antibodies was 1.01. At D7 after the high dose of the study vaccine, the median frequencies of circulating B-cells secreting anti-F antibodies were 133.3/106 (IgG) and 16.7/106 (IgA) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The median frequency of RSV-F–specific interferon γ–secreting T-cells after a ChAd155-RSV high dose was 108.3/106 PBMCs at D30, with no increase after the second dose. Conclusions In adults previously naturally exposed to RSV, ChAd155-RSV generated increases in specific humoral and cellular immune responses without raising significant safety concerns. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02491463., We investigated the safety and immunogenicity of a novel chimpanzee-adenovirus-155 vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV; ChAd155-RSV). In healthy adults with previous natural RSV exposure, ChAd155-RSV generated antigen-specific humoral and cellular immune responses without raising significant safety concerns.

A single dose of either 30 µg or 60 µg of nonadjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein antigen boosts humoral immune responses in women of childbearing age. The investigational vaccine was well tolerated and had a safety profile similar to that of the widely used combined Tdap vaccine., Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes bronchiolitis and pneumonia in neonates and infants. RSV vaccination during pregnancy could boost preexisting neutralizing antibody titers, providing passive protection to newborns. Methods Two observer-blinded, controlled studies (RSV F-020 [clinical trials registration NCT02360475] and RSV F-024 [NCT02753413]) evaluated immunogenicity and safety of an investigational RSV vaccine in healthy, nonpregnant 18–45-year-old women. Both studies used a licensed adult formulation of combined tetanus toxoid-diphtheria toxoid-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine as a control. RSV F-020 evaluated immunogenicity and safety: participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive 1 dose of RSV–prefusion F protein (PreF) vaccine containing 30 µg or 60 µg of nonadjuvanted RSV-PreF, 60 µg of aluminum-adjuvanted RSV-PreF, or Tdap. RSV F-024 evaluated safety: participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 1 dose of 60 µg of nonadjuvanted RSV-PreF or Tdap. Results Both studies showed similar reactogenicity profiles for RSV-PreF and Tdap. No serious adverse events were considered vaccine related. In RSV F-020, geometric mean ratios of RSV-A neutralizing antibody levels at day 30 versus prevaccination were 3.1–3.9 in RSV-PreF recipients and 0.9 in controls. Palivizumab-competing antibody concentrations increased >14-fold in RSV-PreF recipients on day 30. RSV antibody titers waned after day 30 but remained well above baseline through day 90. Conclusions All formulations of RSV-PreF boosted preexisting immune responses in 18–45-year old women with comparable immunogenicity. The RSV-PreF safety profile was similar to that of Tdap vaccine.

Background RSV is a common cause of respiratory acute illness in older adults (OA). We evaluated safety and reactogenicity of RSVPreF3 candidate vaccine in young adults (YA) and OA. Methods In this phase I/II, placebo-controlled, multi-country trial (NCT03814590), YA aged 18–40 years were randomized 1:1:1:1 and received 2 doses of Low-, Medium- or High-dose of RSVPreF3 non-adjuvanted vaccine, or placebo, 2 months apart. Following favorable safety evaluation, a staggered enrolment with 2 steps followed in OA aged 60–80 years, who were randomized 1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1 to receive 1 of the 9 RSV vaccine formulations containing Low-, Medium- or High-dose of RSVPreF3 non-adjuvanted or adjuvanted with AS01E or AS01B, or placebo (same schedule). Safety/reactogenicity up to 1 month post-dose 1 are reported here. Results Exposed set was comprised of 48 YA and 1005 OA. Within 7 days post-dose 1, any solicited/unsolicited adverse event (AE) ranged from 58.3% to 83.3% across YA vaccinees (placebo YA: 58.3%) and from 29.9% to 84.2% across OA vaccinees (placebo OA: 33.7%) (Fig 1). Pain was the most common solicited local AE, being reported in ≤ 58.3% of YA (placebo YA: 0.0%) and at higher rates in the adjuvanted groups (≤ 75.7%) vs non-adjuvanted groups of OA (≤ 14.1%) and placebo OA (4.1%) (Fig 2A). Of solicited general AEs, fatigue (YA: ≤ 41.7% in vaccinees vs 50.0% in placebo; OA: ≤ 48.5% in vaccinees vs 16.3% in placebo) and headache (YA: ≤ 33.3% in vaccinees vs 16.7% in placebo; OA: ≤ 27.7% in vaccinees vs 8.2% in placebo) were most commonly reported (Fig 2B), while fever ≥ 38.0 °C was observed in ≤ 3.0% of OA vaccinees (placebo OA: 0.0%). Grade 3 solicited local and general AEs were observed in OA only, with erythema (≤ 4.9% in vaccinees vs 0.0% in placebo) and fatigue (≤ 2.0% in vaccinees vs 1.0% in placebo) being most common (Fig 2). No serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in YA. A number of 11 OA reported a SAE within 1 month post-dose 1, but none was fatal or assessed as vaccine-related. No clinically significant abnormalities occurred in hematological/biochemical parameters in any group. Figure 1. Percentage of participants presenting at least one type of solicited/unsolicited adverse event (AE) within 7 days post-dose 1 Figure 2. Percentage of participants with at least one type of solicited adverse event (AE) within 7 days post-dose 1 Conclusion First dose of RSVPreF3 candidate vaccine is well tolerated. AE rates tended to be higher after AS01B-adjuvanted formulations compared to other vaccine formulations. No safety concerns were raised. Funding GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA Disclosures Jelena Tica, PhD, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Javier Ruiz Guiñazú, MD MSc, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Charles P. Andrews, MD, GSK group of companies (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Charles Fogarty, MD, GSK group of companies (Grant/Research Support) Edward Kerwin, MD, Amphastar (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)AstraZeneca (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Boehringer Ingelheim (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Chiesi (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Cipla (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)GSK group of companies (Employee, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Mylan (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Novartis (Employee, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)other around 40 pharmaceutical companies (Other Financial or Material Support, conducted multicenter clinical research trials)Pearl (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Sunovion (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Theravance (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau) Isabel Leroux-Roels, MD PhD, GSK group of companies (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Corinne Vandermeulen, MD PhD, GSK group of companies (Other Financial or Material Support, My university only received Grant/Research Support) Marie-Pierre David, MSc, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Nancy Dezutter, PhD, PharmD, RPh, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Laurence Fissette, MSc, GSK group of companies (Employee) Juliane Koch, MD, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Narcisa Mesaros, MD, MSc, GSK group of companies (Employee)

Background. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of childhood bronchiolitis and pneumonia, particularly in early infancy. Immunization of pregnant women could boost preexisting immune responses, providing passive protection to newborns through placental transfer of anti-RSV antibody. Methods. In this first-in-humans clinical trial of a purified recombinant RSV protein F vaccine engineered to preferentially maintain prefusion conformation (RSV-PreF), 128 healthy men 18–44 years old were randomized to one dose of a RSV-PreF vaccine containing 10, 30, or 60 µg of RSV-PreF antigen, with or without alum adjuvant, or control, and followed for one year for safety and immunogenicity outcomes. Results. Injection site pain was the most common adverse event, reported by up to 81.3% of participants. The highest RSV neutralizing antibody responses were in the 30 µg RSV-PreF/alum, 60 µg RSV-PreF/alum, and 60 µg RSV-PreF/nonadjuvant groups. Responses were evident on day 7, and 30 days after vaccination these participants had RSV-A neutralizing antibody titers of ≥1:512, and >70% had titers of 1:1024, with titers increasing by 3.2–4.9 fold. Responses remained high on day 60 but waned on days 180 and 360. Conclusions. The RSV-PreF vaccine elicited rapid RSV neutralizing antibody responses in healthy young men, with an acceptable adverse event profile.

Immunogenicity and safety of different adjuvants combined with a model antigen (HBsAg) were compared. Healthy HBV-naïve adults were randomized to receive HBs adjuvanted with alum or Adjuvant Systems AS01B, AS01E, AS03A or AS04 at Days 0 and 30. Different frequencies of HBs-specific CD4. + T cells 14 days post dose 2 but similar polyfunctionality profiles were induced by the different adjuvants with frequencies significantly higher in the AS01B and AS01E groups than in the other groups. Antibody concentrations 30 days post-dose 2 were significantly higher in AS01B, AS01E and AS03A than in other groups. Limited correlations were observed between HBs-specific CD4. + T cell and antibody responses. Injection site pain was the most common solicited local symptom and was more frequent in AS groups than in alum group. Different adjuvants formulated with the same antigen induced different adaptive immune responses and reactogenicity patterns in healthy naïve adults. The results summary for this study (GSK study number 112115 - NCT, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Long-term immunity, evaluated by the persistence of antibody titers, is important to assess duration of protection induced by vaccination. This paper aims at drawing awareness on the risk of misinterpreting persistence results in absence of adjustment for missing or left-censored data. Using simulations, the paper shows that repeated measurement models are an appropriate alternative to control the bias associated to unadjusted persistence results.

This phase II study evaluated the effect of chloroquine on the specific CD8 + T-cell responses to and the safety of a booster dose of investigational human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) F4/AS01 B vaccine containing 10 μg of recombinant fusion protein (F4) adjuvanted with the AS01 B adjuvant system. Healthy adults aged 21 to 41 years, primed 3 years before with two F4/AS01 B doses containing 10 or 30 μg of F4 ( ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT00434512), were randomized (1:1) to receive the F4/AS01 B booster administered alone or 2 days after chloroquine (300 mg). F4-specific CD8 + /CD4 + T-cell responses were characterized by intracellular cytokine staining and lymphoproliferation assays and anti-F4 antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). No effect of chloroquine on CD4 + /CD8 + T-cell and antibody responses and no vaccine effect on CD8 + T-cell responses (cytokine secretion or proliferation) were detected following F4/AS01 B booster administration. In vitro , chloroquine had a direct inhibitory effect on AS01 B adjuvant properties; AS01-induced cytokine production decreased upon coincubation of cells with chloroquine. In the pooled group of participants primed with F4/AS01 B containing 10 μg of F4, CD4 + T-cell and antibody responses induced by primary vaccination persisted for at least 3 years. The F4/AS01 B booster induced strong F4-specific CD4 + T-cell responses, which persisted for at least 6 months with similar frequencies and polyfunctional phenotypes as following primary vaccination, and high anti-F4 antibody concentrations, reaching higher levels than those following primary vaccination. The F4/AS01 B booster had a clinically acceptable safety and reactogenicity profile. An F4/AS01 B booster dose, administered alone or after chloroquine, induced robust antibody and F4-specific CD4 + T-cell responses but no significant CD8 + T-cell responses (cytokine secretion or proliferation) in healthy adults. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT00972725).

This open, randomized clinical trial (NCT00758264) evaluated the coadministration of a booster dose of the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) and a single dose of the tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-TT) in Taiwanese and Mexican toddlers.Healthy toddlers aged 12-23 months (N = 363) were randomized (2:1:1) to receive either both vaccines at first visit, MenACWY-TT at first visit and 1 month later PHiD-CV, or PHiD-CV at first visit and 1 month later MenACWY-TT. Immune responses were measured 1 month after MenACWY-TT vaccination by meningococcal serum bactericidal activity (rSBA) assay and 1 month after PHiD-CV vaccination by pneumococcal 22F-inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and functional opsonophagocytic activity assay. Solicited and unsolicited symptoms were recorded for days 4 and 31 postvaccination, respectively. Serious adverse events were recorded throughout the study.The prespecified criteria for noninferiority of coadministration versus individual administrations were met for all meningococcal serogroups (in terms of percentages of toddlers with rSBA titer ≥8) and all vaccine pneumococcal serotypes (in terms of antibody geometric mean concentration ratios), except pneumococcal serotype 18C. For each meningococcal serogroup, ≥97.5% of toddlers across the 3 groups had rSBA titers ≥128 at 1 month after MenACWY-TT vaccination. For each pneumococcal serotype, at 1 month after PHiD-CV vaccination, ≥96.0% and ≥92.9% of toddlers across the 3 groups had antibody concentrations ≥0.2 µg/mL and opsonophagocytic activity titers ≥8, respectively. The safety profiles of both vaccines when coadministered were clinically acceptable.This study supports the coadministration of PHiD-CV and MenACWY-TT in toddlers.