Search

Purpose Unintentional weight loss (UWL) is a prevalent problem in people with cancer and is associated with poorer psychosocial outcomes. A gap exists in understanding whether and how perceived and/or weight status impacts experiences of UWL. Thus, we sought to examine subjective experiences of UWL in people with cancer, and whether perceived and/or actual weight status impacts these experiences. Methods Participants were recruited through Cancer Support Community’s Cancer Experience Registry® and related networks. Participants completed an online survey that included the FAACT Anorexia-Cachexia subscale, and 19 items that captured six themes related to “beliefs and concerns” (positive beliefs, psychosocial impact, physical impact, cancer outcomes, self-esteem, relationships with others). Perceived weight status (PWS) was assessed using a single item. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using self-reported weight and height measurements. Results Of 326 respondents, 114 reported experiencing UWL. Over one-third misperceived their weight, with 29% perceiving weight status as below their BMI status. UWL in those with perceived weight status of overweight/obese was associated with positive beliefs. However, being underweight by BMI or perceiving oneself as underweight were both associated with greater concerns about weight loss. Perceived weight status of underweight compared to normal or overweight/obese weight status was associated with poorer psychosocial well-being, personal control, self-esteem, and relationships with others. Conclusion In people with cancer, perceived weight status, rather than BMI, had greater impact on negative “beliefs and concerns” about UWL. Findings suggest assessment of both perceived and actual BMI to address the impact of UWL on psychosocial wellbeing.

Aims Self‐management programmes for type 1 diabetes, such as the UK’s Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE), improve short‐term clinical outcomes but difficulties maintaining behavioural changes attenuate long‐term impact. This study used the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) framework to revise the DAFNE intervention to support sustained behaviour change. Methods A four‐step method was based on the BCW intervention development approach: 1) Identifying self‐management behaviours and barriers/enablers to maintaining them via stakeholder consultation and evidence synthesis, and mapping barriers/enablers to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation‐Behaviour (COM‐B) model. 2) Specifying behaviour change techniques (BCTs) in the existing DAFNE intervention using the Behaviour Change Techniques Taxonomy (BCTTv1). 3) Identifying additional BCTs to target the barriers/enablers using the BCW and BCTTv1. 4) Parallel stakeholder consultation to generate recommendations for intervention revision. Revised materials were co‐designed by stakeholders (diabetologists, psychologists, specialist nurses and dietitians). Results Thirty‐four barriers and five enablers to sustaining self‐management post‐DAFNE, were identified. The existing DAFNE intervention contained 24 BCTs, which partially addressed the enablers. Twenty‐seven BCTs were added, including ‘Habit formation’, ‘Credible source’ and ‘Conserving mental resources’. Fifteen stakeholder‐agreed recommendations for content and delivery were incorporated into the final DAFNEplus intervention, comprising three co‐designed components: (1) face‐to‐face group learning course, (2) individual structured follow‐up sessions, (3) technological support, including blood glucose data management. Conclusions This method provided a systematic approach to specifying and revising a behaviour change intervention incorporating stakeholder input. The revised DAFNEplus intervention aims to support the maintenance of behavioural changes by targeting barriers and enablers to sustaining self‐management behaviours.

Aims\ud \ud Sustained engagement in type 1 diabetes self‐management behaviours is a critical element in achieving improvements in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and minimising risk of complications. Evaluations of self‐management programmes, such as Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE), typically find that initial improvements are rarely sustained beyond 12 months. This study identified behaviours involved in sustained type 1 diabetes self‐management, their influences and relationships to each other.\ud \ud \ud Methods\ud \ud A mixed‐methods study was conducted following the first two steps of the Behaviour Change Wheel framework. First, an expert stakeholder consultation identified behaviours involved in self‐management of type 1 diabetes. Second, three evidence sources (systematic review, healthcare provider‐generated ‘red flags’ and participant‐generated ‘frequently asked questions’) were analysed to identify and synthesise modifiable barriers and enablers to sustained self‐management. These were characterised according to the Capability‐Opportunity‐Motivation‐Behaviour (COM‐B) model.\ud \ud \ud Results\ud \ud 150 distinct behaviours were identified and organised into three self‐regulatory behavioural cycles, reflecting different temporal and situational aspects of diabetes self‐management: Routine (e.g. checking blood glucose), Reactive (e.g. treating hypoglycaemia) and Reflective (e.g. reviewing blood glucose data to identify patterns). Thirty‐four barriers and five enablers were identified: 10 relating to Capability, 20 to Opportunity and nine to Motivation.\ud \ud \ud Conclusions\ud \ud Multiple behaviours within three self‐management cycles are involved in sustained type 1 diabetes self‐management. There are a wide range of barriers and enablers that should be addressed to support self‐management behaviours and improve clinical outcomes. The present study provides an evidence base for refining and developing type 1 diabetes self‐management programmes.

BackgroundPrimary care guidelines for managing adult overweight/obesity recommend routine measurement of body mass index (BMI) and the offer of weight management interventions. Many studies state that this is rarely done, but the extent to which overweight/obesity is recognised, considered, and documented in routine care has not been determined.AimTo identify the epidemiology of adult overweight documentation and management by UK GPs.Design and settingA systematic review of studies since 2006 from eight electronic databases and grey literature.MethodIncluded studies measured the proportion of adult patients with documented BMI or weight loss intervention offers in routine primary care in the UK. A narrative synthesis reports the prevalence and pattern of the outcomes.ResultsIn total, 2845 articles were identified, and seven were included; four with UK-wide data and three with regional-level data. The proportion of patients with a documented BMI was 58–79% (28–37% within a year). For overweight/obese patients alone, 43–52% had a recent BMI record, and 15–42% had a documented intervention offer. BMI documentation was positively associated with older age, female sex, higher BMI, coexistent chronic disease, and higher deprivation.ConclusionBMI is under-recorded and weight loss interventions are under-referred for primary care adult patients in the UK despite the obesity register in the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). The review identified likely underserved groups such as younger males and otherwise healthy overweight/obese individuals to whom attention should now be directed. The proposed amendment to the obesity register QOF could prompt improvements but has not been adopted for 2017.

© 2018 International Union against Tubercul. and Lung Dis.. All rights reserved. SETTING: Tuberculosis (TB) is prevalent in the homeless population, and can create health inequalities and challenges for eradication. Evidence-based approaches to active case finding (ACF) are needed. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of ACF for TB control, and identify strategies to improve uptake of screening and the diagnostic pathway in homeless populations in low- and medium-burden settings. Secondary objectives were to assess the yield of screening and participant characteristics. DESIGN: A systematic search of electronic databases and grey literature sources identified ACF studies that reported population measures (prevalence or incidence) of TB control, and/or uptake and/or yield of screening for latent tuberculous infection (LTBI) or active TB affecting any site. Studies were described using narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were heterogeneous across multiple elements, including programme design, which likely contributed to variability in outcomes. ACF was associated with reductions in TB rates in three time-trend analyses. The strongest evidence for improving uptake of screening was for incentives, with mixed evidence for peer educators. At the observational level, professional support and mandatory screening may also improve uptake, and additional community support enhanced completion of the diagnostic pathway. Those most likely to be diagnosed with TB appeared less likely to accept screening. Yield of screening was 1.5-57% (41 684 participants) for LTBI, and 0-3.1% (91 771 participants) for active TB. CONCLUSIONS: Observational evidence suggests that ACF is effective. Strategies to improve screening uptake were identified. Variability in uptake and yield necessitates programmes tailored to local populations; areas for further research were identified.

BackgroundYoung people (aged 16–24 years) with long-term health conditions tend to disengage from health services, resulting in poor health outcomes. They are prolific users of digital communications. Innovative UK NHS clinicians use digital communication with these young people. The NHS plans to use digital communication with patients more widely.ObjectivesTo explore how health-care engagement can be improved using digital clinical communication (DCC); understand effects, impacts, costs and necessary safeguards; and provide critical analysis of its use, monitoring and evaluation.DesignObservational mixed-methods case studies; systematic scoping literature reviews; assessment of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); public and patient involvement; and consensus development through focus groups.SettingTwenty NHS specialist clinical teams from across England and Wales, providing care for 13 different long-term physical or mental health conditions.ParticipantsOne hundred and sixty-five young people aged 16–24 years living with a long-term health condition; 13 parents; 173 clinical team members; and 16 information governance specialists.InterventionsClinical teams and young people variously used mobile phone calls, text messages, e-mail and voice over internet protocol.Main outcome measuresEmpirical work – thematic and ethical analysis of qualitative data; annual direct costs; did not attend, accident and emergency attendance and hospital admission rates plus clinic-specific clinical outcomes. Scoping reviews–patient, health professional and service delivery outcomes and technical problems. PROMs: scale validity, relevance and credibility.Data sourcesObservation, interview, structured survey, routinely collected data, focus groups and peer-reviewed publications.ResultsDigital communication enables access for young people to the right clinician when it makes a difference for managing their health condition. This is valued as additional to traditional clinic appointments. This access challenges the nature and boundaries of therapeutic relationships, but can improve them, increase patient empowerment and enhance activation. Risks include increased dependence on clinicians, inadvertent disclosure of confidential information and communication failures, but clinicians and young people mitigate these risks. Workload increases and the main cost is staff time. Clinical teams had not evaluated the impact of their intervention and analysis of routinely collected data did not identify any impact. There are no currently used generic outcome measures, but the Patient Activation Measure and the Physicians’ Humanistic Behaviours Questionnaire are promising. Scoping reviews suggest DCC is acceptable to young people, but with no clear evidence of benefit except for mental health.LimitationsQualitative data were mostly from clinician enthusiasts. No interviews were achieved with young people who do not attend clinics. Clinicians struggled to estimate workload. Only eight full sets of routine data were available.ConclusionsTimely DCC is perceived as making a difference to health care and health outcomes for young people with long-term conditions, but this is not supported by evidence that measures health outcomes. Such communication is challenging and costly to provide, but valued by young people.Future workFuture development should distinguish digital communication replacing traditional clinic appointments and additional timely communication. Evaluation is needed that uses relevant generic outcomes.Study registrationTwo of the reviews in this study are registered as PROSPERO CRD42016035467 and CRD42016038792.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.

Background Identifying tuberculosis in homeless populations through active case finding (ACF) is recommended to address health inequalities and contribute to wider control strategies for tuberculosis. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of ACF. Methods This systematic review assessed studies on ACF done in countries with low or medium burden of tuberculosis across Europe, the USA, and Australia. We systematically searched EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, ASSIA, Pro-Quest, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library and grey literature for English language publications up to Jan 5, 2019 (no earlier date limit). We used concepts of “ACF”, “tuberculosis”, and “homeless person”. We identified studies that analysed ACF and reported on our outcome measures, in homeless populations, in low-burden and medium-burden countries. ACF screening included testing for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) or active tuberculosis affecting any site. Studies into outbreak control or other populations were excluded. Primary study outcomes were the effectiveness of ACF (using population measures of tuberculosis prevalence or incidence) and interventions to improve ACF uptake and completion of the diagnostic pathway. Secondary outcomes were yield of ACF, cost-effectiveness, and characteristics of participants. Findings 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. Study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Three time-trend analyses produced some evidence that ACF was effective, because it was associated with reductions in tuberculosis incidence, prevalence, or clustering. A modelling study also showed that ACF was more effective than passive case finding in reducing population tuberculosis burden. Material incentives have the strongest evidence for improving uptake of ACF, with mixed evidence for peer educators. Observational evidence shows professional support and mandatory screening might also enhance uptake, and additional community-based support improves completion of the diagnostic pathway. Across all studies, the yield of screening (defined as the proportion of screened individuals who test positive) ranged from 1·5% to 57% for LTBI (total 41 684 individuals screened), and 0–3·1% for active tuberculosis (total 91 771 individuals screened). ACF can be cost-effective; population prevalence and screening modalities are determinants of cost-effectiveness. Considering ACF participants, subgroups most likely to be diagnosed with tuberculosis appeared less likely to accept screening. Interpretation ACF should be considered in both tuberculosis and homelessness strategies, with evidence-based interventions to improve implementation. Outcomes varied widely, meaning programmes must be tailored to local populations. Strengths of our study include generalisable results to homeless populations from diverse settings. Limitations include restriction to the English language, the fairly low grade of the evidence identified, and the low number of studies screening for LTBI or using newer screening tests. Funding The South West Public Health Training Programme.

e22131Background: Many cancer patients have concerns about nutrition, weight, fatigue, or fitness, but may have difficulty discussing these topics with their health care team (HCT). We examined ass...

The college campus is a complex system which necessitates the use of a variety of methods of intervention within an integrated model of consultation.

Counseling centers, and other student services agencies, can best serve their constituents by acknowledging and emphasizing the vast potential of preventive interventions.