1. Brief collaborative care intervention to reduce perceived unmet needs in highly distressed breast cancer patients: randomized controlled trial
- Author
-
Nobuyasu Yoshimoto, Kanae Momino, Fujika Katsuki, Tatsuya Toyama, Hiroshi Sugiura, Hiroko Yamashita, Tatsuo Akechi, and Yumi Wanifuchi-Endo
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,Coping (psychology) ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Collaborative Care ,Breast Neoplasms ,law.invention ,Unmet needs ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Breast cancer ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Outcome Assessment, Health Care ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Cooperative Behavior ,business.industry ,Psychological distress ,General Medicine ,Fear ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Clinical trial ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Physical therapy ,Quality of Life ,Hormonal therapy ,Female ,Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ,business ,Stress, Psychological - Abstract
Objectives Our newly developed brief collaborative care intervention program has been suggested to be effective in reducing breast cancer patients’ unmet needs and psychological distress; however, there has been no controlled trial to investigate its effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the program in relation to patients’ perceived needs and other relevant outcomes for patients including quality of life, psychological distress and fear of recurrence (Clinical trial register; UMIN-CTR, Clinical registration number; R5172). Methods Fifty-nine highly distressed breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy were randomly assigned either to a treatment as usual group or to a collaborative care intervention, consisting of four sessions that mainly included assessment of the patients’ perceived needs, learning skills of problem-solving treatment for coping with unmet needs and psycho-education provided by trained nurses supervised by a psycho-oncologist. Results Although >80% of the eligible patients agreed to participate, and >90% of participants completed the intervention, there were no significant differences with regard to patients’ needs, quality of life, psychological distress and fear of recurrence, both at 1 and 3 months after intervention. Conclusion Newly developed brief collaborative care intervention program was found to be feasible and acceptable. The trial, however, failed to show the effectiveness of the program on patients’ relevant subjective outcomes. Further intervention program having both brevity and sufficient intensity should be developed in future studies.
- Published
- 2020