Search

CONTEXT: Pain can be a debilitating side effect of radiation therapy (RT). Data from the general population has shown that sleep disturbance can influence pain incidence and severity; however, less is known about this relationship in breast cancer patients receiving RT. OBJECTIVES: This secondary analysis examined the association of pre-treatment moderate/severe levels of sleep disturbance with subsequent RT-induced pain after adjusting for pre-RT pain. METHODS: We report on 573 female breast cancer patients undergoing RT from a previously completed phase II clinical trial for radiation dermatitis. Sleep disturbance, total pain, and pain subdomains – sensory pain, affective pain, and perceived pain intensity were assessed at pre- and post-RT. At pre-RT, patients were dichotomized into 2 groups: those with moderate/severe sleep disturbance (N=85) vs. those with no/mild sleep disturbance (control; N=488). RESULTS: At pre-RT, women with moderate/severe sleep disturbance were younger, less likely to be married, more likely to have had mastectomy and chemotherapy, and more likely to have depression/anxiety disorder and fatigue than the control group (all p’s

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures play an important role in clinical care. Currently, a broad-spectrum, validated PRO measure suitable for all dermatology patients, as part of clinical care, does not exist. Patient-reported Outcome Measures Information System (PROMIS) measures track specific domain outcomes across all diseases. To assess the relevance and utility of a computer-adaptive health assessment consisting of three PROMIS domains in routine dermatologic care. This retrospective study evaluated a PROMIS health assessment, consisting of three computer-adaptive test domains (pain interference, anxiety, and depression), administered as part of routine clinical care in three dermatology clinics at an academic medical center. The primary objective was to identify clinically significant associations between high PROMIS domain scores (i.e., t score > 55) and dermatologic disease, as well as change in PROMIS domain scores in response to treatment. The majority of patients who initiated the assessment completed all domains (88.7%). In patients with atopic dermatitis, acne, hidradenitis suppurativa, and psoriasis, high PROMIS scores correlated with clinically relevant outcomes, such as severe disease, unsuccessful treatment, uncontrolled disease, and the presence of a mental health condition. PROMIS Pain Interference, anxiety and depression identified patients with severe disease, unsuccessful treatment regimens, poorly-controlled disease, and/or mental health comorbidities for multiple skin conditions. Further utilization of PROMIS domains in routine clinical care will promote patient-centered care and improve quality of care.

PURPOSE: Despite advances in medical technology, radiation dermatitis occurs in 95% of patients receiving radiation therapy (RT) for cancer. Currently, there is no standard and effective treatment for the prevention or control of radiation dermatitis. The goal of the study was to determine the efficacy of oral curcumin, one of the biologically active components in turmeric, at reducing radiation dermatitis severity (RDS) at the end of RT, using the RDS scale, compared to placebo. METHODS: This was a multisite, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of 686 breast cancer patients. Patients took four 500 mg capsules of placebo or curcumin three times daily throughout their prescribed course of RT until one week post-RT. RESULTS: A total of 686 patients were included in the final analyses (87.5% white females, mean age = 58). Linear mixed model analyses demonstrated that curcumin did not reduce radiation dermatitis severity at the end of RT compared to placebo (B (95% CI) =0.044 (−0.101, 0.188), p=0.552). Fewer curcumin patients with RDS > 3.0 suggested a trend toward reduced severity (7.4% vs. 12.9%, p=0.082). Patient-reported changes in pain, symptoms, and quality of life were not statistically significant between arms. CONCLUSIONS: Oral curcumin did not significantly reduce radiation dermatitis severity compared to placebo. The skin rating variation and broad eligibility criteria could not account for the undetectable therapeutic effect. An objective measure for radiation dermatitis severity and further exploration for an effective treatment for radiation dermatitis is warranted.

PURPOSE: Although topical agents are often provided during radiation therapy, there is limited consensus and evidence for their use prophylactically to prevent or reduce radiation dermatitis. METHODS: This was a multi-site, randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded study of 191 breast cancer patients to compare the prophylactic effectiveness of three topical agents (Curcumin, HPR Plus™, and Placebo) for reducing radiation dermatitis and associated pain. Patients applied the topical agent to their skin in the radiation area site three times daily starting the first day of radiation therapy (RT) until 1 week after RT completion. RESULTS: Of the 191 randomized patients, 171 patients were included in the final analyses (87.5% white females, mean age = 58 (range = 36–88)). Mean radiation dermatitis severity (RDS) scores did not significantly differ between study arms (Curcumin = 2.68 [2.49, 2.86]; HPR Plus™ = 2.64 [2.45, 2.82]; Placebo = 2.63 [2.44, 2.83];p = 0.929). Logistic regression analyses showed that increased breast field separation positively correlated with increased radiation dermatitis severity (p = 0.018). In patients with high breast field separation (≥ 25 cm), RDS scores (Curcumin = 2.70 [2.21, 3.19]; HPR Plus™ = 3.57 [3.16, 4.00]; Placebo = 2.95 [2.60, 3.30];p = 0.024) and pain scores (Curcumin = 0.52 [− 0.28, 1.33]; HPR Plus™ = 0.55 [− 0.19, 1.30]; Placebo = 1.73 [0.97, 2.50]; p = 0.046) significantly differed at the end of RT. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no significant effects of the treatment groups on the overall population, our exploratory subgroup analysis suggests that prophylactic treatment with topical curcumin may be effective for minimizing skin reactions and pain for patients with high breast separation (≥ 25 cm) who may have the worst skin reactions.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The purpose of the present secondary data analysis was to examine the effect of moderate-severe disturbed sleep before the start of radiation therapy (RT) on subsequent RT-induced pain. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Analyses were performed on 676 RT-naïve breast cancer patients (mean age 58, 100% female) scheduled to receive RT from a previously completed nationwide, multicenter, phase II randomized controlled trial examining the efficacy of oral curcumin on radiation dermatitis severity. The trial was conducted at 21 community oncology practices throughout the US affiliated with the University of Rochester Cancer Center NCI’s Community Oncology Research Program (URCC NCORP) Research Base. Sleep disturbance was assessed using a single item question from the modified MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (SI) on a 0–10 scale, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. Total subjective pain as well as the subdomains of pain (sensory, affective, and perceived) were assessed by the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain at treatment site (pain-Tx) was also assessed using a single item question from the SI. These assessments were included for pre-RT (baseline) and post-RT. For the present analyses, patients were dichotomized into 2 groups: those who had moderate-severe disturbed sleep at baseline (score≥4 on the SI; n=101) Versus those who had mild or no disturbed sleep (control group; score=0–3 on the SI; n=575). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Prior to the start of RT, breast cancer patients with moderate-severe disturbed sleep at baseline were younger, less likely to have had lumpectomy or partial mastectomy while more likely to have had total mastectomy and chemotherapy, more likely to be on sleep, anti-anxiety/depression, and prescription pain medications, and more likely to suffer from depression or anxiety disorder than the control group (all p’s≤0.02). Spearman rank correlations showed that changes in sleep disturbance from baseline to post-RT were significantly correlated with concurrent changes in total pain (r=0.38; pr=0.35; pr=0.21; pr=0.37; pr=0.35; pp=0.006). Generalized linear estimating equations, after controlling for baseline pain and other covariates (baseline fatigue and distress, age, sleep medications, anti-anxiety/depression medications, prescription pain medications, and depression or anxiety disorder), showed that patients with moderate-severe disturbed sleep at baseline had significantly higher mean values of post-RT total pain (by 39%; p=0.033), post-RT sensory pain (by 41%; p=0.046), and post-RT affective pain (by 55%; p=0.035) than the control group. Perceived pain intensity (p=0.066) and pain-Tx (p=0.086) at post-RT were not significantly different between the 2 groups. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: These findings suggest that moderate-severe disturbed sleep prior to RT is an important predictor for worsening of pain at post-RT in breast cancer patients. There could be several plausible reasons for this. Sleep disturbance, such as sleep loss and sleep continuity disturbance, could result in impaired sleep related recovery and repair of tissue damage associated with cancer and its treatment; thus, resulting in the amplification of pain. Sleep disturbance may also reduce pain tolerance threshold through increased sensitization of the central nervous system. In addition, pain and sleep disturbance may share common neuroimmunological pathways. Sleep disturbance may modulate inflammation, which in turn may contribute to increased pain. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and whether interventions targeting sleep disturbance in early phase could be potential alternate approaches to reduce pain after RT.

3581 Background: Pain is a prevalent, debilitating symptom in more than half of cancer patients. Accumulating evidence suggests a bi-directional relationship between gut microbiota and pain, potentially via inflammation and oxidative stress. Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), a pro-inflammatory anaerobic bacterium, is frequently detected in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. To date, no study has identified a relationship between Fn and cancer pain in CRC patients. We investigated the associations between pre-treatment Fn and cancer pain at 6 months post-surgery in CRC patients. Methods: We utilized pre-surgery stool samples collected from 80 prospectively followed, newly diagnosed CRC patients recruited from the German site of the international ColoCare Study. Eligible patients were neo-adjuvant treatment naïve and did not use antibiotics for at least 1 month before stool collection. Fn DNA was assessed via quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Patients were median split into Fn-high (>17.27; n=40) or Fn-low (≤17.27; n=40). Cancer pain was assessed using the 2 pain symptom items from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core-30 (lower score=lower pain) at pre- and 6 months post-surgery. Results: Before surgery, 48% of all patients reported any pain. At 6 months post-surgery, we observed a decrease in cancer pain by 33% for Fn-low, while there was an increase in cancer pain by 41% for Fn-high. After controlling for pre-surgery cancer pain in ANCOVA model, we observed significantly higher mean cancer pain at 6 months post-surgery in the Fn-high group vs. the Fn-low group (24.07 vs. 13.44; effect size, ES=0.45; p=0.04). These results were maintained even after controlling for age, sex, tumor stage and site, adjuvant chemotherapy, BMI, physical activity, and any pain medications (29.11 vs. 16.55; ES=0.53; p=0.03). Conclusions: These findings suggest that high Fn is an independent predictor of cancer pain at 6 months post-surgery in colorectal cancer patients. Further research is needed to confirm and understand the mechanisms of these results. Funding: NCI U01 CA206110.

Importance: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic skin disease with significant comorbidities and a dramatic impact on quality of life. Despite this, there is little published information about healthcare utilization patterns for adults and children with AD. Objective: To examine healthcare utilization for patients with AD who are cared for in a regional academic medical center. Design: Retrospective cohort analysis. Setting: A mixed urban, suburban and rural catchment in the Western NY region. Participants: All patients seeking medical care for their AD from March of 2011 to September 2015. Exposure(s) for observational studies: Active AD. Main Measure(s): Age, sex, race, ethnicity, (demographics) and medical specialty (healthcare utilization). Patients were stratified and analyzed by age group. Results: Adult AD patients (n=767) accounted for 38.2% of the AD population seeking healthcare in our system with a mean age of 42.7 ± 18.7 years. Among adults, females were seen more commonly than males (65.3% vs. 34.7%). In contrast, both genders were equally represented in the pediatric population ( 18 years; 35.2%). Dermatologists cared for the majority of patients (35.2%), followed by pediatricians (25.7%) and family medicine physicians (10.1%). African-Americans were nearly 3 times more likely than Caucasians to visit primary care physicians for their initial AD management (p

10100Background: Pain is a debilitating side effect that remains poorly controlled in ~50% of cancer patients. Data from the general population has shown a strong bi-directional relationship betwee...

INCOSE has become one of the professional societies overseeing ABET accreditation for systems engineering. This session present an overview of INCOSE's accreditation strategy, perspectives from recent evaluators of an undergraduate and a graduate program, an international perspective, a summary of why one major school has decided not to accredit its program, and a summary of why another did attempt accreditation. A floor discussion will follow.

Can children's responses to tests be used to provide useful diagnostic information for classroom teachers? This article describes an analysis of children's performance in the 1997 UK mathematics tests by 7 and 14 year-olds. The children's responses and errors were scaled against their ability using Rasch methodology. These were then interpreted in terms of the literature on the psychology of mathematics education, especially that related to misconceptions, and an attempt was made to describe children's progression in thinking as it relates to their test performance. This work has been reported to all primary and secondary schools in England and Wales, and is intended to provide a description of what the children believe and know. As such it provides a resource to help raise teachers' awareness of their children's thinking and present openings for diagnostic assessment and teaching. Opportunities for and obstacles to developing this approach in future are discussed.