Search

The first child carried by a surrogate after in vitro fertilization in the United States was born in 1985. Since then, the number of such births has steadily grown. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the number of gestational carrier cycles increased from 727 in 1999 to 3,432 in 2013, encompassing more than 18,000 children born over this period. Surrogacy offers an alternative to adoption. However, it also disrupts traditional notions of parentage and gestation and complicates the role of obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) in helping their patients navigate difficult ethical issues. Surrogacy legislation falls under the jurisdiction of each individual state, which results in a variety of approaches. In this article, we review the legal aspects of surrogacy important for specialist ob-gyns, including select landmark court cases, states' approaches to surrogacy legislation, and unique components of informed consent. We also provide clinical recommendations specific to the United States for working with gestational surrogates and intended parents, spanning preconception, prenatal care, and delivery.

Lesbians are pursuing parenthood in greater numbers than ever, but their family-building journey is significantly more challenging than it is for heterosexual couples. Extensive research has debunked the myth that children raised in lesbian families show higher rates of psychopathology or difficulty with adjustment. Despite this, lesbians pursuing parenthood still face overt and subtle discrimination in society generally and in healthcare specifically. They must engage in a multifaceted decision-making process, navigate a more complex logistical process, and cope with greater financial expense. The aim of this chapter is to outline the unique experiences and needs of lesbians becoming parents, identify barriers to care, and highlight strategies to address them.

The rise of the Internet Age has brought a host of sweeping changes to the landscape of third-party reproduction. What began as a dyadic relationship between doctor and patient has evolved into a more complex system in which patients are able to access information online from a variety of external sources. Patients often seek to play a more active role in their third-party reproductive care, and the Internet allows them to do so. Further, demand for both medical and psychosocial information about donors and donor-conceived siblings, available online through patient forums and genetic registries, has altered the perception of gamete donation from a one-time event to an ongoing relationship. The advantages and disadvantages for patients and providers of this freer flow of information between third-party participants are examined. Search motivations of recipients and offspring, as well as types of information sought, are detailed. Recommendations are made regarding strategies fertility programs can use to optimally support their patients and navigate this new landscape.